Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings (5)

Active
80
pinkerton (36) 03-09-08  03:53am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (25), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Plenty of sites to choose from and it's fairly cheap.
Lots of pretty girls though quite a few are regular stars on other network's porn sites.
No download limits.
Works well with my download manager.
Straightforward navigation and browsing.
Photo sets provided as zip files.
Cons: The only good sites are Cum Fiesta and Mike's Apartment, perhaps followed by 8th Street Latinas and Milf Hunter (if you like 'em more mature with bad boob jobs).
Overall video quality is reasonable at best - older clips are split into 3 or more files and aren't great at 350x240; newer clips are 480x360 split files and the very latest are 720x480 in one file.
Quite a few photo sets seem padded out with too many similar pics e.g. final 20-30 pics of the set are the girl's face just after the cum shot with little difference between each pic.
Very little 2-on-1.
Bottom Line: Not a bad network of sites but in comparison with the competition, they're about 3 years behind in terms of video quality.
I don't know why sites don't remaster/recode the older videos to bring their quality up to date with the latest updates but in this day of HDV sites, the older vids here are only really fit for viewing on mobile devices.
Some may argue that the less than great quality videos adds to their reality feel - a fair point, but one that's lost on me.
For me, the stand-outs here are Cum Fiesta and Mike's Apartment, the other sites didn't do that much for me.
It's 5 bucks cheaper that most sites but then I might be willing to pay the bit extra for better quality if that what it takes.
The actual quality shown in the previews of some porn sites actually matches their content, but that's not the case with the RK sites, so I probably won't be back anytime soon.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.


  Be the first to reply to pinkerton!

  Reply To Review


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.