Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Only Cuties

Only Cuties (0)

Davit (46) 03-07-08  03:45pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (29), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -Gorgeous young girls
-Lots of 2-girl and solo girl action
-B-G as well, for those that like that
-Nice big archive
-Very reasonable resolution movies (widescreen 852x480, smallscreen 640x480)
-Zipped picture sets
-Daily whole-movie or pic updates
-Excellent navigation - select all the genres you want from a list, then hit 'search'!
Cons: -Too many boring movies - acted out in a 'porn by numbers' way
-Pic sets uninspired - often just the same old standard poses with dildos
-Way too much use of dildos generally
Bottom Line: You know when you get a hot girl back to your place, and she has all the right ingredients - but then in the sack she's uninspiring, unadventurous, and makes you look forward to the post-coital cigarette?

Well, for me, that's how Only Cuties makes me feel. A site like this really should be awesome with what it has; nubile young firm-breasted cuties showing off their talents, with each other, alone, or with a guy.
Problem is, for many of them, their talents are not all that impressive. Don't get me wrong; it ticks most of the boxes - tongue kissing, oral, masturbation with dildos (too much dildo action for my tastes), fisting, anal - more anal would be nice - but in the main this site has the ingredients.

But it just doesn't always do this with enough *heat* or believable passion. It looks, for too many of the girls, like a job to do, rather than an experience to be savoured. Too many of the movies end with the girls lying side by side, not looking at each other, dildoing their respective pussies, as if alone.

There are exceptions, but those exceptions should be the rule.

As far as the all-girl and solo material here is concerned: if you've seen some of the best sites of these genres by now, you may find this site does it a little less well.

On the other hand, if you are quite new to internet porn, and want to experience a site to open the door to multiple hours of sexy naked girls spreading their legs for the camera, then there are worse places to start than here.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Drooler (220) Nice review, Davit. You make your points eloquently on the subject of "disinspiration," if I may coin a term. I agree with everything you said here. It's rare that a review so completely matches my own experiences and opinions of a site.
03-08-08  04:26am

Reply To Message


Davit (46) REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :

Well, Drooler old boy, you know what they say: 'Great minds' and all that!
03-08-08  02:52pm

Reply To Message


visor (7) Agree totally. They're pretty, but it ends up being sort of antiseptic. Could do with more variety (eg more m/f, some hairy pussies, some anal etc)
03-12-08  10:06am

Reply To Message


Davit (46) REPLY TO #3 - visor :

Agree with everything you said except more m/f, but that's personal taste for you! :)
03-12-08  05:16pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.