Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Rodney Moore

Rodney Moore (0)

Toadsith (48) 03-05-08  10:41pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (47), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Most Videos Have Screenshots
* Newest Video Res. 718x404 at 1621kbps
* Newest Video in WMV or MOV
* No DRM
* Download Manager Friendly
* Fast Downloads (1Mbps+)
* Some Matched Photos Sets (avg. 600x900)
* All Content Categorized and Labeled by Model
* Subcategorized Model Index
* Content from 1997 to Present
* Models of Every Type (Body Type and Experience)
* Softcore, Lesbian and Hardcore Content
Cons: * Older Video Res. 320x240 (Most Video)
* Avg. Video Length 3 ~ 5 min.
* All DVD Excerpts / No Full DVD Downloads
* No Full Length Video
* No Video Zip Files
* Watermark on Video & Photos
* Most Video in MOV
* No Search Engine
* Site Design stuck in the ‘90s
* Confusing, Inconsistent Site Navigation
Bottom Line: Rodney Moore is content in need of a website: a complete site redesign is in order. The vast majority of the content is in MOV with no easy way of being downloaded (they actually recommends you hunt through your temp. internet files). Newer content allows WMV or MPG downloads. Some sets do have screenshots and many sets have matching photos – but zip files are available only to the newest content.

Granted, there is a ton of content – some dating back to 1997 – over 1000 models. Everything is excerpts from DVDs Rodney Moore has produced. Problem is, often times much of the DVD isn’t available and a full, single file download is out of the question. Video quality & resolution is all over the place – some of the newest is HD – most is small; you usually get professional lighting mixed with amateur cameras with lens vignetting – it is almost bipolar.

A lot of time has been spent on categorizing, there is a good model index and if you just want highlights of a video – this site is for you. However there’s no search engine of any sort.

It pains me not to be able to rank this site high – the content is truly great: outstanding cumshots, a diverse group of models from pure amateurs to seasoned professionals and every body type, lesbian sex, boy/girl sex, et cetera. Production values aside – Rodney Moore has an eye for interesting porn and models. Simply though, the learning curve for the site navigation is so steep that I’d rather rent his DVDs than deal with this site.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


jd1961 (95) Thanks. At least he allows downloads now. Mov files can be downloaded if you are willing to purchase Quicktime Pro, but that would be an added expense on top of the monthly fee here.
03-06-08  02:35am

Reply To Message


Toadsith (48) REPLY TO #1 - jd1961 :

Indeed, and I hardly think a site can request that of its users. You can also just click "View Source" and that combined with the Page Properties will give you the URL your Download Manager needs. Still it is an awful pain-in-the-ass for a what should be a simple matter.

I would love for them to buy a ready-made site design that handles video & photo content, sit down and convert all the DVDs to high-resolution WMVs and be done with it. I would easily give this site a glowing 95 (about as high as I'm willing to go for any site) if they could just make the site user friendly. It is bloody rat maze in there! Plus, my luck as usual, most of the content I want is older content, meaning the video quality is near terrible and downloading is a hair-pulling experience.

Oh well - hopefully sometime in the foreseeable future they will be enlightened and invest the money in a proper website.


03-06-08  02:43am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.