Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Jerked Network

Jerked Network (0)

porngoblin (3) 02-16-08  03:35pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -high resolution videos, including a lot of HD.
-several resolution options: low, medium, high, super HD WMVs, some high MPGs, and both streaming and download options on everything.
-full-length and clips available for download.
-excellent site design and network navigation.
-good price ($17.95) through thebestporn.com.
-original content on four flagship sites.
Cons: -some bandwidth limiting on downloads.
-video quality is good, but file sizes are excessively huge.
-same models across many of the network sites
-sex is fairly vanilla
-many models are only "average", in both appearance and-or performance.
-pictures are uninteresting afterthoughts.
Bottom Line: It's a good network that includes a lot of true HD with full 1920 x 1080 WMVs, and even the medium (640 x 360) and high (1280 x 720) videos are huge. The low quality are dramatically poor (480 x 272), but then that's what low quality means. Everything is freely downloadable and all but the 1080p and MPGs can be streamed in Windows Media Player. The site layout is clean and smart, a good example of how sites *should* be laid out, and navigation from site to site is very easy with an everpresent dropdown list of the main network sites.

Despite the claim of 40+ sites, unless you are a fan of streaming-only, mediocre, poor quality (480x300) DVD material, only the first 14 sites of the network are of any note. Of the 14 noteworthy sites, only the first 4 are original content and the other 10 are DVDs. Not that there's anything wrong with that -- my favs in the network are not the original content sites -- but the front page is deliberately worded to allow the assumption they have 40+ (or at least 14) sites of exclusive content, which is not the case.

My main gripes are that the sex is surprisingly mundane, and that less than half of the performers are either known or talented. The taglines promise serious hardcore action, but none of the sites deliver anything extreme. and then bandwidth is throttled to around 250 KB/s, with a max of 3 connections allowed, so I can't use my full broadband, which is a megapain with HD file sizes up to 750Mb!

Reply To Review

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.

  Be the first to reply to porngoblin!

  Reply To Review

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.