Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Crush Photo

Crush Photo (0)

jd1961 (95) 02-09-08  12:39pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Attractive Site
- Hi-Res Photos
- Zip Files
- Good Selection Of Attractive Models
- A Forum
Cons: - Low-Res Videos
- Vids Only Available In Split MPEGS
- No Vids In Recent Updates
Bottom Line: Crush went offline a year or so ago, so it is nice to see it back in action. It does need some work though, particularly with its video section. The videos are behind current standards, they are mpegs split into 1 or 2 minute segments, which means 6 or 7 for each episode. They are low resolution (304x240). That's not going to cut it in today's HD world. Hopefully this will be addressed in the near future, because I like the concept of the Crush "Empire". The site has an aura of fantasy and color which I appreciate. My personal opinion is that porn should be divorced from reality as much as possible. That's just my opinion, for those who have a preference toward "reality" based porn, this site is surely not for you. Crush touches more upon the imagination rather than the groin! The girls are attractive, and well presented. They are placed on a pedestal as it were. They are presented as erotic symbols rather than objects. The photos are hi-res, about 2240px, and available in quick loading zip files. The site says it updates every few days, which seems to be about 4 times a week. However, I am not seeing any new videos lately. There is also a forum here where you can communicate with the webmaster. This site seems to still be getting off the ground, although the old archives are available. Better video quality would have raised my score 5 points. HD is a must for a site like this IMO. A very attractive and interesting site.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Drooler (220) Hey JD, I've been looking forward to this review. I do have a question or two.

Are all of the photos about 2240px, or just more recent ones?

How much in archives does the site have?

Your response and the trouble it will take is of course much appreciated.

02-09-08  02:10pm

Reply To Message


jd1961 (95) REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :

As far as I can tell, yes, they are all that large. They do come in 2 sizes also.
02-09-08  03:46pm

Reply To Message


jd1961 (95) REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :

There are about 40 models, and they have multiple sets, some of them dozens, so it's hard to say exactly how many.
02-09-08  03:50pm

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #3 - jd1961 :

Thanks, JD, for both.
02-09-08  03:55pm

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) Well, jd, I joined the empire. Gotta say there are some hot pics here. The ones of Twyla (aka Adel) are really hot, for instance. Also found some Carrie Starr (as Persephone) that ko'd my ass. I love that girl.

Just the same, this site has some problems and weirdness. For one thing, I can't find any galley thumbs save those little ones floating in a "galaxy" somewhere, so I just went for the zips. Download, open, and see.

And they have problems. Sometimes a subfile is missing from the "mass" zips on the left hand side. And sometimes the names don't even match: on the table of zips, the mass zip of Hisella "Illumine" (left side) is matched with smaller "Lipstick" zips on the right. (There are others, too.) And I got two of the same sets of pics from different zips of her. It's getting confusing.

For weirdness, using "flimstrip" mode in XP, a thumb at the bottom doesn't match the pic in the larger view. It happens a LOT. Means you have to use filmstrip to see what's actually there, which slows things down even more.

It's still a good deal for $20, but one thing leads to another and there are dues to pay for the enjoyment.

Whoops! This is a kind of ancillary review, but I think people should know. These guys need to sharpen up their archiving skills.

Or they could have just made it simpler to begin with. All of this complexity (and piecemealing!) is too hard for them to manage.

02-10-08  11:46am

Reply To Message


jd1961 (95) REPLY TO #5 - Drooler :

To tell the truth Drooler, I hadn't noticed the things you mention because I just have been downloading the zips and organizing them in my fashion. It is a bit if a different navigation going on there for sure. I just looked at the zip problem you mention. You shaould post in that forum and alert the webmaster about it. I know he just put those zips up the day I joined. As I say, the site still needs work.
02-10-08  08:33pm

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) I was just checking in at Crush (Twyla aka Adel Sharp has me entralled) and noticed that there are no new updates since March 11th. There's a note on the update page that says, "Upon securing of additional capital, Crush will resume regular update schedule."

Whew, my last day was March 10th, so I'm lucky with that at least! ;)

And as for that notice, I guess there's a first time for everything. I'd think that KEEPING the regular update schedule might actually be a little less discouraging for the old cash flow, but hey ... whatever!

03-28-08  10:24am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.