Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Helen\'s Planet

Helen's Planet (0)

Drooler (220) 01-26-08  11:19am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (83), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +large photos (2858x1900)
+most photosets have good lighting
+videos in 2 sizes (large is 1280x720, wmv)
+no DRM
+screen caps for videos are at 1200px
+seamless login -- just go to the site and you're in
Cons: -Photos are rather amateurishly done. Too much cropping out of top of head, arms, butt cheek, etc. Some are blurry. The occasional funny faces and awkward body angles detract from what could have been a more arousing experience.
-Only one size of photos
-Only 44 photo galleries to date since the launch date of Aug. 20, 2007. (Updates are SLOW.)
-No new photosets since Jan 9, 2008 -- to end of subscription in early Feb.
-Only 9 videos to date
-Pitches to "friends" sites are in the left column and in a section all their own. They aren't much of a nuisance to me. They might bother some people. For others, they could wind up being a financial "black hole."
Bottom Line: Helen, as she's called here, is a very naturally sexy girl! She's been making the rounds in the softcore universe, appearing at a constellation of sites such as FemJoy, JustTeenSite, MetArt, MetModels, Nubiles, Pretty4Ever, and her own planet's co-orbiting GlamDeluxe. (Fortunately, have not seen any duplications of material between the two.)

One video is of an "interview" with her in a moving car with two jovial, unseen guys. They all speak good English (slight Russian accents), but there's a lot of cutting as Helen, while friendly, doesn't give way to questions about her private sex life. In part of it, they turn on loud music (distracting).

Another is of her on a couch, stripping and showing her stuff. Music is the audio track. Sexy, with some full "mooning," but it has the "nebulous" feeling of something done with little forethought.

Same with the photos. There are better ones at most of the other sites mentioned. Though I wasn't terribly disappointed, a pretty, sexy girl, a good camera, and good lighting aren't enough to make great photosets. The understanding of having poses a certain way, composed in the frame a certain way, for the essential purpose of building the turn on in the subscriber needs more consideration here.

Overall, it's an OK site for guys like me who "have it" for sweet, lovely Helen, but it isn't good enough for the price they ask. We'd need better quality and more frequent updates for that.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (15)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


jd1961 (95) It's "Natasha"! If this were the only site to get her material, I'd join in a second, but she's at Met-Art, Femjoy, Met Models, Just Teensite, and now W4B. She is an excellent model, but this seems to be a case of over exposure. Still...it's seems exclusive. I had a lot of Evelyn Lory material, so I hesitated to join her site, but was pleased with the new material. I almost wish you didn't review this, because it's tempting and I'm in about 6 sites now, and way behind! BTW, who are her friends?
01-27-08  03:38am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #1 - jd1961 :

Know what you mean. It was a discussion I had with Denner about this girl and this site that got me itching until I finally scratched. It is all exclusive material.

And I have it even worse for Evelyn, far worse. Gotta hand it to her; she seems to be very selective these days and will only appear on quality sites, like MetArt. But if she returned even to KarupsPC again, I'd be tempted. Evelyn, "you don't love me but you make me so happy."

The "friends" at Helen's are GlamDeluxe and a few additional solo sites. There's one of this thin but shapely blond (with a NICE ass) that has me simmering. Sorry, can't remember the name.

You'll probably see them even as a visitor. These folks just love to sell porn subscriptions.

I file Helen under "Larissa," btw, her nom de moon at FemJoy. I've got so many Natasha's now that they're as plentiful as the Nikky's, Nikki's, Lucy's, Lucie's and the Kata/Katerina's.

01-27-08  05:24am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #1 - jd1961 :

Whoops, no, the "friends" DON'T appear on visitor's pages. GlamDeluxe doesn't show them, either. Here's what to look for:

paristale (with the fine ass. Looks like you could crack an egg on it. Squeezing the edge of my desk, trying hard to resist!)

Still more are for 8teenies, nubiles, and of course, glamdeluxe.

01-27-08  05:45am

Reply To Message


Denner (233) First:
Great review!
You joined after all, Drooler.
Too bad about the photo-quality - guess there was no way to know from the review.
And too bad about too few videos.

Still she's both sexy and sweet...Her videos at Nubiles are very fine.
And she's also at Amour Angels - I'm normally not much into outdoor scenes, but this is great.

01-27-08  11:08am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #4 - Denner :

I have the bad habit of telling myself that I won't do it again, but then I do after all: I join a site taking the risk that it won't be that great. It's why the "average score" of sites I've reviewed keeps sliding. And yes, I'm not easy to please, anyway. 78.6 as of now.

I now have just under a half gig of Helen/Larissa/Natasha. That's more than I have of Lucie Stratilova! Helen, I'm impressed!

From that interview video, I see that Helen really is more of a girl than a woman at this stage in her life. She's legal, but not as mature for her age as some 18-year-olds. I don't mean it as a put-down; she just needs to time to grow up a little, so she'll deal with the boys' questions with less giggling. At least she's started early! (heh-heh)

Hell, I'm old enough to be her dad. Scandalous!

01-27-08  12:49pm

Reply To Message


Denner (233) REPLY TO #5 - Drooler :

Be doing the same lately - in a matter of bad habits.
Last couple of days I joined some 4-5 sites and regretting it (taking to many chances)
Against my better judgement there is for one British Hot Girls (I have a thing at the moment about british girls and their accent) But this one sucks. Average photo-quality and mostly lousy video-ditto - and the girls average and less than that.

And he,he - it's extremely scandolous that we dig those teens......

01-27-08  02:00pm

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #6 - Denner :

I guess we're just young at heart -- despite what physicians might say to the contrary.

And yes, somehow the British sites are usually disappointing. I really hate having a bias against things from the "motherland" (being American and something of an Anglophile), but their chicks tend to be less hot. Adele Stephens was hot, but I think she's "done the lot" as they say.

I used to think that Viv Thomas was the grand exception until I found out he's from South Africa. And most of his girls are of course from Eastern Europe -- the gene pool of paradise!

01-27-08  02:26pm

Reply To Message


jd1961 (95) REPLY TO #2 - Drooler :

Don't look now, but she's also at Averotica as Nata.
01-29-08  01:28pm

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #8 - jd1961 :

JD, are you trying to get back at me for tempting you with Helen's site? No, seriously, thanks for the tip, as this kind of stuff is right up my alley. I wouldn't have looked otherwise as the name means "video site" to my mind; I'd have been wrong.

I might wait since it's a small collection.

Famous last words ...

01-29-08  02:01pm

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #6 - Denner :

Hey Denner,
I was at AvErotica and found a new site of our lovely Helen (Larissa, etc.). It's www.eronata.com

Could only see a limited update list on it (25 pic sets; 4 vids), but it looks similar in design to AvErotica. They say the vids are HD and the pics are 1000, 2500, and 4300 pix.

I've asked TBP to list it.

It's $24.95. Maybe I'll let it grow a while? ;)

07-26-08  12:29am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #6 - Denner :

OK, Denner. You'll probably laugh, but you'll be glad you read this.

I went ahead and joined eronata and guess what? It's a bunch of teaser stuff! There's hardly ANY full nudity at all. She might take her top off, and she showed her butt like in two galleries, but that's it! And there's only 36 galleries -- all of this really lite stuff.

And in the "About Me" part, it goes on about how she likes to pose nude! What a ripoff!! Grrrrrrr!

I think I might consider writing a review, though. Mmmmm. Yes, that might be a good idea.

Funny how when there isn't explict nudity, that's when I get offended. LOL.

07-26-08  01:02am

Reply To Message


Denner (233) REPLY TO #11 - Drooler :

Hey Drooler
Thanks for the updates on this...and for the warning!

What a bummer!
It's somewhat strange with that nude-posing "advertising" - and the reality looks more like a no-nude site. Strange because "our little friend" do a lot of full nudity at her own site, at Nubiles and even some masturbation-like at Solo Teen Girls....but bottom: Yes, ripoff.
BTW: Never joined Helen's Planet - and I'm glad - the lack of updates here is also like ripoff.

Man, that eronata-site deserves a Drooler-review!
Cheers, mate!

07-26-08  02:48am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #12 - Denner :

Yeah! She DOES do lots of nudity. I just simply expected that.

"Man, that eronata-site deserves a Drooler-review!"

Well, chances are GOOD it's gonna get one. I've already taken to calling it "Ero NADA!" HA-HA.

07-26-08  05:17am

Reply To Message


PU Staff
REPLY TO #10 - Drooler :

That site has now been added to PornUsers.

You may enter your remarks at:

07-26-08  08:02am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #14 - Khan :

Thanks, Khan! I just about to search for it but you saved me the trouble.
07-26-08  01:16pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.03 seconds.