Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Tushy Lickers

Tushy Lickers (0)

Davit (46) 01-20-08  10:09am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (29), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: -95% of videos are about girls licking each other's assholes. So it does what it says on the tin.
-Lots of content - I downloaded 140 movies in a month
-Movies are well produced, well shot, well filmed, well lit (in the main)
-Most of the girls are very hot and very sexy
Cons: -Movies are generally very short - around 8 minutes on average I would guess.
-Movie quality is very low by today's standards. They're still watchable - but are probably half the quality of, say, 21 Sextury movies (which are not very hi res in the first place).
-Generally, movies come in pairs; in the first movie girl 'A' will pleasure girl 'B', then in the next movie visa versa. It would be more natural to have a single longer movie for each coupling (or threeway) where they pleasure each other within the same movie.
-Navigation and design is very basic and uninspired
Bottom Line: Bottom line - now there's an apt phrase for a review of this site. I can honestly say for all it's faults, I have never regretted shelling out the month's fee to access this site's movie booty (oops, there goes another pun).

I'm a self-confessed lover of lesbian anilingus. I just adore it. So it was inevitable that I would find this site alluring. Yes, Tushy Lickers would be so much better if it had better movie quality, zipped pic sets, and classier navigation. It has none of these.

But what it does offer, is a single-minded dedication to the lesbian analingus niche that no other site yet does (as far as I'm aware). It does stray occasionally into B/G scenarios (maybe 5% of movies), which may please some viewers (although I honestly cannot understand how, unless the viewer is bisexual).

Underneath the lo-res presentation of the movies can still clearly be seen high quality original productions, that would be perfectly at home on any lesbian DVD. Yes, I emphasise, the production quality is let down only at the very last stage of file conversion. If these were to be remastered, they could be lesbian classics.

'Ifs' and 'butts'
If lesbianism - or analingus - is not your bag, then the 'cons' will make this site not worth your time or money. But if this kind of action is paradise to you, then this site will give you a small taste of heaven.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Robare (6) So, are you able to give us the resolution and bitrate figures? If they're MPG or WMV, then that information may be available in Windows Media Player.
Also, from looking at the site's promotional pages, there appear to be, at present, 172 video and photo sets available and they appear to have been updating once a week for at least a year. There are no sample videos or photos (beyond what "right-click, save image as" provides) available. And, I got the impression from reading your review that there were usually two files per update, one where model A is a recipient and one where model B is a recipient, and that each of these files is 6-7 minutes in duration. Can you confirm?
And, of the movies you've seen, are these models actually having orgasms and by anal stimulation alone?

01-20-08  11:14am

Reply To Message


Davit (46) REPLY TO #1 - Robare :

Hi Robare

OK, I'll try and answer your questions mate.

Firstly, yeah, *generally speaking* the updates come in pairs of updates for couples (each the reverse role of the other in terms of recipient) or if it's a threeway then there tends to be 3 updates, where each girl has her turn at being the recipient of the other two. They tend to be not very long - although there are some that go up as long as 11 minutes, but these are in the minority. The shortest one I have is 2mins 11 secs, again in the minority. I'll amend my average to maybe 8 minutes (but that's a best guess - don't expect me to go through my entire collection and work out the exact average, please, I don't want to get pedantic).

Bitrate seems to be mainly 521kbps/320x240. There are also a handful (on my hard drive at least) that are twice this (1060kbps/640x480). This surprised me when I checked this just now, so I played a couple to get a fresh idea of how they look, compared to the many other vids I have. And, very importantly, they *look* much lower res than the stats would suggest. One possible reason is that they've come from a lo-res source - or possibly that the conversion software is substandard. This, of course, is pure conjecture, I can only speak objectively about how they physically look when played. And they do look quite low res and grainy - although, as I said in my review - still watchable.

Your final question about orgasms - in all honesty, I'm not convinced that most of the orgasms portrayed here are genuine. As with most sites, there's little or no evidence of real white 'girl goo' to be seen (the only definitive proof of female orgasm really). But at the same time, the girls don't 'overact' and do seem to be really having a great time together, and most of the climaxes - whether real or not - are the result of anal stimulation principally, and sometimes, but not always, aided by vaginal stimulation simultaneously. The emphasis is definitely on tongue to ass. And the camera is good at getting that shot - after all, it's the whole point of the site.

Hope this helps, but if you have any more questions, or if I have been unclear, please ask away!

01-20-08  12:19pm

Reply To Message


Robare (6) Thank-you, sir, for your responses, time, and consideration.
01-20-08  12:42pm

Reply To Message


Davit (46) REPLY TO #3 - Robare :

Most welcome indeed. Maybe you'll join and give your own review. You may find other aspects worthy of comment that I didn't, or just offer an alternative viewpoint (which is what user reviews are all about).

01-21-08  02:34pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.03 seconds.