Review Replies (4)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
RagingBuddhist (59)
|
If I've read you right, you've compared this site to other mature sites, they seemed popular, so that somehow means this site deserves a high rating? I'm just not too clear why you would give a site a 90 when you find it so boring, repetitive and lackluster.
Also, unless you join only sites with models, like MetArt or Femjoy, or masturbation or lesbian sites, I think you'll be sadly disappointed with most sites you might have a look at - I think it'd be safe to say that most hardcore sites will have at LEAST one guy for every woman.
|
01-16-08 10:28pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
little rabbit (3)
|
Why I gave a 90 ?
It's very easy to understand : at mature.nl, the models look really like amateurs mature models.
With all other mature sites, the models have a monotonous looking.
Just take a look at allover30.com, for instance, to see what they will offer for the 2 next weeks....
And silicone chemistry, for one half of the models.
The videos are always with the same screenplay : a boring interview, and after this, 3 videos with a dildo, lying for 10 minutes on her back.
2 or 3 stagged crapelos, and : "Next One".....
Totally boring.
At least, at mature.nl, there are a little of lesbian show, and some good ones solo show.
And the most part of the models are not looking like a Playmate being past her prime.
The best could be a site with the AbbyWinters.com chemistry, and models from 40 to 60.
THis surely will come, but it's a dream, now.
|
01-17-08 04:06am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
RagingBuddhist (59)
|
REPLY TO #2 - little rabbit :
The further explanations do make it clearer why you would rate this a better than average site but, at least to me, you seem to contradict yourself a bit. In your original review you said it was repetitive: "the "screennplay" is really too repetitive : fucking, fucking and fucking". Now you're mentioning at least some variety, with lesbian and solo scenes.
I guess it's just a case of differing opinions when it comes to what makes a site rate higher. To me, even daily updates of women I find attractive will grow stale very quickly when there's very little "chemistry", as you put it. If too many of the models on a site are doing the same thing as the next, I don't know that I could put that site in the excellent category. A good example would be my re-review of ifeelmyself.com. It still has it's charm to me because they update daily and it's still very amateurish, but it's becoming so... damn... repetitive. Kind of like if I were eating roast beef sandwiches everyday for a month - I think I'd start to hate roast beef.
|
01-17-08 06:30pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
little rabbit (3)
|
"you seem to contradict yourself a bit".
When I see some known mature sites with a rating of 87, I have to rate this one with a 90.
It's not so complicate, just a necessary consistency.
And as I also list all the pro / cons I see, and also why I give such a rate, everybody can consider about.
Just have to read all what I wrote.
|
01-18-08 04:30am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.01 seconds.
|
|
