Glam Deluxe Review by Drooler

Welcome GUEST! CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

Learn how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!

User Review

A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Glam Deluxe (1)

Active

Drooler (218)

01-03-08 06:47am

TRUST USER? YES (84), NO (0)

Status:

Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).

Pros:

+51 models, predominately Russian, some hot! (188 galleries)
+Photo quality has been improving, especially in 2007
+Most photos are between 2000 and 3500px on the long end
+Good server speed
+Login first requires typing in use-pass and a displayed code, but after that, just clicking the member’s entrance gets you straight in.
+Prompt technical assistance

Cons:

-No zips!
-Only about 12 photoset updates per month in 2007
-Photos in only one size
-Some earlier photos as small as 1024px
-Ugly watermark on pics
-Videos? Most links to videos in the models index are inactive.
-Videos? They’re slide shows! (Actually, they’re called “flix” on this site.)
-Only 23 “videos,” 7 of which are of the same model (Nadja)
-Sample file sizes: 16mb (wmv), 18mb (DivX), 124mb (Quicktime). The quality doesn’t seem THAT different.
-Not totally exclusive

Bottom Line:

I wonder if the term “flix” here is somehow intended to distinguish them from actual videos. As they are really awful, I also wonder who would want them. They are a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside three video format enigmas, especially Quicktime, which is about 5 times larger than the wmv or avi versions with no discernible improvement in quality.

The pics, on the other hand, are making me happier and happier as the quality is getting better, and some of their recent models are really beautiful and hot, including
Abigail (Anastasia atNubiles)
Darina (Emanuelle at Nubiles)
Francesca G (Olga at JustTeenSite, Ofemija at FemJoy)
June (aka Bianca, Ekaterina, Kamea, Katya, Tatyana)
Kayla
Lea (Masha at TeenDreams)
Victoria (Ira H at MetArt)
Yana, and of course
Helena (of Helen’s Planet).

One set, of their “Abril,” is the same as one on My Precious Virgins (as “Gaby”) – hence the “not totally exclusive.” Could such a thing happen again?

I do wish that the thumbs didn’t cut out part of what is in the actual photos, which sometimes is the case. “What you see is what you get” (WYSIWYG) would be a better approach.

That foamy green-colored watermark looks completely out of place on the pics, too. Yech!

And it’s about time that they at least provided zips (they do at their Helena's Planet) and 2 pic sizes (the current large size and one half that size). That would help the score.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (9)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg #	User	Message	Date
1	jd1961 (95)	Good review! I don't understand the "no zip" policy. All that clicking and saving is bad for the hands! As far as I'm concerned, at my age, that is a big negative! Thanks for the warning.	01-03-08 09:42am Reply To Message
2	Drooler (218)	REPLY TO #1 - jd1961 : Yes, indeed. No zips? Eh? Can I get a discount coupon for physical therapy sessions? Anymore, a site without zips has, ironically enough, sealed its fate as 2nd rate.	01-03-08 09:49am Reply To Message
3	jd1961 (95)	REPLY TO #2 - Drooler : They should read this because this is a site I seriously considered joining, but all that clicking-----I already ruined one mouse!	01-03-08 09:51am Reply To Message
4	Drooler (218)	REPLY TO #3 - jd1961 : I wonder if it would work with a download manager. Can't say I tried it myself. (Tried with one once and the software was little too primitive for me and just gave up.) Anwyay, no excuse for coming into the world zipless. I just took my time and cherry picked one set every few days or so.	01-03-08 09:57am Reply To Message
5	Denner (233)	Thanks! This review really puts things in perspective. The Drooler is foremost a photo-fellow user - and here I can relate to the score. And boy, is he right about the parody of what this site calls video - or "flixs" - it's a laugh. All in all a great review for users who have had their eye on this site for quite a while. Sad though, 'cause the company have the site Helen's Planet with some very fine videos of a real doll by the name of.......yeah, Helen.	01-03-08 11:04am Reply To Message
6	Denner (233)	Hey.....by the way: Congratulations! You have your cards full, I see - all the badges. Great, brother! If there's one who deserves it, it's you... And to PU and TBP: Let's have a vote for the best all around reviews in 2007 - and another badge for the winner...	01-03-08 11:13am Reply To Message
7	Drooler (218)	REPLY TO #5 - Denner : Speaking of Helen's Planet, I'm going in for a landing some time this year. Wow! She looks like your girl next door, then you approach her, and then she turns and looks right at you with those blue eyes -- the "Sex Beam," set to stun!	01-03-08 01:01pm Reply To Message
8	Drooler (218)	REPLY TO #6 - Denner : Well, thanks bro'. I like your idea about voting on reviews. And I've had a bunch of thoughts of a retrospective nature, such as funniest review, funniest poll reply, best review on video content, best review in X niche, most technically helpful user (might well be jd1961), etc. It's just a swirl in my mind at this point, but maybe something could be cooked up for the anniversary, which isn't too far away. Of course, this would need to be worked out with those who run this site. Thing is, I'm all spent on trying to find sites to review now. GlamDeluxe was the last on my list. But I guess you never know ...	01-03-08 01:14pm Reply To Message
9	Denner (233)	REPLY TO #7 - Drooler : That's for sure - and I really like her sets at Nubiles...	01-03-08 01:15pm Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.