Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit MC Nudes

MC Nudes (2)

Active
78
Drooler (220) 12-26-07  06:03am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +All exclusive content
+Many stunning women, 93 in all
+Daily photoset updates from March 2005, but still more back to Oct. ‘04.
+3 sizes: 600, 1200, and 2-5000px (zips or singles) from Feb. 07 (prior to then only 1000’s and very large)
+Voting on models and photosets
+Zips at good download speeds
+78 artsy videos (17 are g/g) in avi (1280x720 by far the best), wmv, qt and ipod
+Extensive public preview area
+Very attractive site design
+Not many g/g pics
+NO TOYS!
Cons: -VERY sluggish when navigating
-Some photos are way too grainy/have too much noise, some are too dark, and there’s too much “detached” posing. (It’s “art,” you see.)
-Photosets vary from only 1 page to 5 or more
-Model index is disorganized
-Model search engine OK by hair color or bra size, but by country, name, or age it’s hit or miss. Example: The very popular Hungarian blond Britney/Brigitte Hunter is here as “Luisa” from the United States.
-Video d/l is slow, around 100K
Bottom Line: #1: They need to get their page (and video) servers up to speed. They update at precisely 11 p.m. GMT, and apparently lots of eager droolers (self included) know this. Sometimes it’s been impossible to log on around this time, and once I finally do, each page load takes the better part of a minute. Even in off hours, a 35 sec. click ‘n wait is no surprise. Every time.

I also wonder about security. I had a 365-day membership that ended earlier this year, and just days before it did my access got blocked; it had been hacked and shared. Their support promptly gave me a new pwd along with some barely veiled allegations. Did I get hacked or did they? (If interested, see replies to this review.)

About their models: They’re very selective overall. Aneta Smrhova, Ariel/Piper Fawn, Ellena, Ivette Blanche, Katy Gold, Klara/Zoe, Lenka Horokova, Marketa Belonoha, Simi (as Olivia), Susana Spears, Zuzana Zeleznovova, ETC.

Some of the photos are among the finest I’ve seen, but it’s still a crap shoot because others literally made the con’s point above. Example: Zuzana in the sauna -- so grainy that the silo ends its life as a double entrendre.

Of course there’s no hardcore, but asking for hardcore at a site like this is like expecting Twinkies at a hardware store. Do we ask hardcore sites to go softcore? See what I’m saying?

I’d certainly go from “might recommend” to “recommend” to lovers of softcore if they’d fix those persistent server problems.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

jd1961 (95) I wouldn't worry about security too much, these sites are hacked on a daily basis. Remember to try to use different USERNAMES, the hackers use usernames to generate passwords.
12-26-07  09:57am

Reply To Message

2

Drooler (220) REPLY TO #1 - jd1961 :

Thanks for the tip. I always use cryptic usernames and passwords (I never use "Drooler"), but I was near the end of the year of that subscription, so who knows?

And yes, hackers are constantly flailing away at our favorite candy shops. The sorry buggers.

Maybe I should ask you: Does having the browser remember the UN and PWD increase the risk, all other things (personal firewall on, etc.) being equal? 'Cause that's what I used to have with MC Nudes when the hacks hacked. These days, I always just type it in.

12-26-07  10:25am

Reply To Message

3

jd1961 (95) REPLY TO #2 - Drooler :

No, they have computer generated usernames and passwords. They count on people using the same username over and over to make it easier. Then they let the software do the work. It's not a result of someone hijacking....that would be for your banking records LOL! I just make a notepad for my use/pass, and keep it on my desktop. The only computer a website hacker is going to break into is the website's. But that is very time consuming. They have software where they feed in massive lists of use/pass.
12-26-07  11:24am

Reply To Message

4

Drooler (220) REPLY TO #3 - jd1961 :

Well, at least one of my suspicions has turned out to be groundless.

Every one of my use/passes is unique for each site, but the key thing I get from this is that using the same for a site for a long time is a bad idea.

I guess the hackers are pretty good at spoofing new IP addresses, too, in order to keep throwing logins at sites.

Well, thanks again, jd.

12-26-07  12:19pm

Reply To Message

5

jd1961 (95) REPLY TO #4 - Drooler :

Anyone can do it if they want to take the time. They're not geniuses, they just load data they share with other hackers. They find the combinations, and the website usually shuts it down in a day. But really, I don't even worry about it, I would just get another password. One time though I noticed a whole bunch of "favorites" in my folder at a side that I didn't put there, so I alerted the site and got a new pass.
12-26-07  02:40pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.