Babelicious Review by Drooler

Welcome GUEST! CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

Learn how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!

User Review

A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Babelicious (0)

Active

Drooler (218)

12-09-07 10:52am

TRUST USER? YES (84), NO (0)

Status:

Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).

Pros:

+570 photo sets to date, usually of very HOT Euro and American babes
+Just 37 of the photosets are hc (a + for me; a - for others, though)
+Pic sizes max at range of 2500 to 4000px
+Zips or pics à la carte in 1000, 2000, and max size for each photoset (usually)
+Flexible, intuitive navigation and gallery viewing options
+Very easy and helpful search functions
+265 vids (35 are b/g; 20 are lez)
+Detailed info (for each vid, too) available to visitors
+8 bonus sites (3 are really good!)

Cons:

-Most of the content is not exclusive, but generally done better than other sites do.
-Too much toy content; would like more good solo ASS content, like Claudia Oct. 28, photo number 62. (THAT’S what I’m talkin’ about!)
-Wish they had thumbs corresponding to the main activities in each vid segment; they have good thumbs for the content overview of each vid, though.

Bottom Line:

I’ve seen LOTS of these photosets at BlueFantasies, TeenDreams, Xisty, ATK Galleria, and the now defunct BrandNewBabes, BUT Babelicious offers larger pic sizes and more flexible viewing and download options than most. (I like to view all the pics on one page, and it’s a snap here.) And Xisty puts only a fraction of their content above 1800px in a “special” section of their site; at Babelicious, it’s just normal to have pix at 2500px or higher. So Babelicious does ‘em best, that’s for sure.

Add to the pros:
+You can vote on each model and on each photoset and video, and you can post comments
+Previews of the next 10 photosets to come and the next 6 videos
+Highly responsive, friendly support
+The bonus sites SexyBabes.tv, DreamBabes, and Eurobabez update 5-6 days per week. From Sept this year, SexyBabes got an improved interface (similar to Babelicious’) and has been offering larger pics, sometimes to 3500px, as well! DreamBabes offers a lot of MatrixNudes content, usually at 1600px. Eurobabez also does 1600px most of the time. All of them also have even more videos! And all have zips.

Add to the cons:
-The bonus site content isn’t exclusive, either, except perhaps BabesUK, which updates infrequently and erratically and has a “bleached” quality in the photos.

Among those sites that specialize in the non-exclusive (hey, someone has to!), Babelicious is probably the best there is. It’s very user-friendly, with valuable features and tons of content.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg #	User	Message	Date
1	Nick C (34) Webmaster	Thankyou for the detailed review, hope you are still enjoying the site! Best Regards Nick Webmaster	02-20-08 08:34am Reply To Message
2	Drooler (218)	REPLY TO #1 - Nick C : I'm still a member, and occasionally there's something that I really like. The recent one of Annette Dawn in the kitchen was nice. (Can't remember if it was on Babelicious or one of the bonus sites.) And there was one of Marina/Euphrat under a tree not to far back that was great for what I'm after, which are nice pics of the girl showing her tail. So I wrote the review and scored it in terms what I thought was appropriate for the general subscriber. Personally, I don't care for the amount of toy play that's there. I actually wouldn't mind at all if it didn't push the nice tail shots off the page, which it seems to do on most sites. I don't know if you can get what I mean. That's why I mentioned that shot of Klaudia in the review. It's an example of doing it right, at least as I see it.	02-20-08 02:49pm Reply To Message
3	JBDICK (20)	Thanks Drooler Good Review. Very informative. Thanks. I'll be considering babelicious.com at some stage. I've been waiting ages for Anette Dawn to do hardcore. She never will I guess, but her galleries look good. some other favorites of mine Peaches, Veronika Simon, Angel Dark, Mya Diamond, Ginger, Susana Spears, Aneta Keys. My weakness - I love the European Girls. First time I've noticed Kirsten Andrews. Hello. Ding Dong. Thanks. Hope to continue sharing.	04-05-08 02:59pm Reply To Message
4	Drooler (218)	REPLY TO #3 - JBDICK : Hey JBDICK, We have similar tastes, as most of the girls you list are among my favorites. I'd put Peaches, Susana Spears, and Aneta at the top. If you ever join MetArt, there's a nice bunch of Peaches stuff there, and galleries of most of the other girls you list. I remember when I first saw Peaches at KarupsPC (as Elena), back in its 1024px days. She was younger and looked a bit "green" compared to now, but I was instantly struck by something about her. I'm really glad she's stayed in the game. I cannot get enough of Peaches. Happy browsing!	04-05-08 03:21pm Reply To Message
5	JBDICK (20)	REPLY TO #4 - Drooler : Hi Drooler It does sound like it. I do favour the European girls. There is a sense they are prepared to just get down to it and yet they are beautiful, tend to be a bit more genuine and deep down they just love getting sorted out as opposed to most american pornstars who, probably because they get paid more, turn themselves into business women. If ever I'm looking for someone I use sites like eurobabeindex.com or cduniverse.com to identify film titles then search for those. Helps me make decisions over which site but I have to say this review site is superb. Really informative. For some strange reason, I've got an itch for Vanessa May. Managed to find film - Fucker Takes All. She plays a shop assistant. tightest skirt I've ever seen. She only has a slight frame, amazing body and everything she was born with.	04-05-08 03:52pm Reply To Message
6	Drooler (218)	REPLY TO #5 - JBDICK : I have to agree that in general, there is something more genuine (and uninhibited) about the European girls. It comes across. In addition to pay, I think there's a cultural difference, too. I find that around actual European women I can be more relaxed, whereas I have to watch what I say around the Americans more. Anyway, it would take tomes to read to explain it all, if I even could! There are exceptions, of course. I find that Tiffany Brookes is more "genuine." Maybe it's that Texas thing. I don't know for sure.	04-05-08 04:49pm Reply To Message
7	JBDICK (20)	REPLY TO #1 - Nick C : Nick C can I just say that Drooler's review is far superior to that done by Toadmix...and this leads me to a question to you guys as Webmasters... This may be impossible to do and is a tall order but I think as an enhancement to your site, I think that if you as the Webmasters representing PU and TBP, could nominate reviews that you and us other pornusers value as the best reviews can keep as the best review somehow near the top of the reviews list... Alternatively, we could have a forum thread where PUs and TBP could nominate the best reviews on PU...so others can refer to them as the benchmark, otherwise you will continue to have mediocre reviews like the one that Toadmix has done... When I do a review myself, I have a different (unique) style to mine which is natural to me to write...but I can honestly say that my reviews take me anywhere from 1/2 hour to 1 hour to think of and write...and I'm guessing that Drooler has put a lot of effort into his, as well as others like Taodsith... I just think there are hard workers here and easy riders... Just a view but one I felt I wanted to share with you guys... PU and TBP are great sites and the effort I spend inputting to your site should indicate to you that you have my loyalty, and I would imagine looking at the other player, much bigger than me, but Toadsith and Drooler come to mind spend a fair amount of time on your site aswell... By the way, this is my 100th reply, and I chose this as my reply because I want this anniversary to be a good one for me... Here's to more happy hunting and good reviews...Thanks, Keep up the good work.	04-27-08 02:02pm Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.