| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
roseman (253)
|
Hey Mrs. Mina, can you add some more details in your review?
|
02-05-07 05:23am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Mina (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #1 - roseman :
Increase the space of characters and I'll be glad to.
|
02-05-07 08:29pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
SnowDude (214)
|
Are you saying there's not one thing about this site that could be improved? I think that's what you'd have to be saying to give a site a perfect score and I've never seen a website that couldn't be improved. So I'm skeptical, but would like to hear more of your thoughts.
|
02-05-07 09:17pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Mina (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #3 - SnowDude :
There is my opinion hope you all like it 'nuff says... I'm not much of a detailer especially since english is not my first language.
|
02-05-07 09:27pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
roseman (253)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Mina :
lol, the space of character should be enough, I think.
|
02-06-07 07:20am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
roseman (253)
|
The review seems okay now, but no cons?
|
02-06-07 03:05pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Mina (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #6 - roseman :
Ok I updated the review a bit and I put some con. Hope that squares off everything. Peace !
|
02-06-07 07:19pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
roseman (253)
|
REPLY TO #7 - Mina :
cool, thanks! :)
|
02-06-07 11:15pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Khan
PU Staff
|
Importnat Notice
You will note the score on this review has been dropped from 100 to 50, the lowest possible score. This is because we have strong evidence to indicate that the review was posted by the webmaster of this site. As there were replies to this review, we feel this is a better course of action than removing it entirely.
The follow-up replies to inquiries by users would seem to indicate that this was no accident but rather an attempt to deceive users into thinking this review was legit.
For the record, our terms make it very clear that webmasters are not allowed to post reviews for their own site(s) or any site we list.
We feel strongly that webmasters posting fake reviews undermines the confidence our users have in the reviews they read here. Thus, we will continue to take whatever steps needed to discourage such attempts to fool our users.
|
02-07-07 08:31am
Reply To Message
|
10
|
Jay G (65)
|
REPLY TO #9 - Khan :
Thanks, Khan! I'm glad you did what you did and kept the whole dialogue available. It's interesting reading!
|
07-15-07 07:28am
Reply To Message
|
