Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Ron Harris

Ron Harris (0)

Active
83
PosterDude (14) 12-03-07  06:20am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (20), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: + Very pretty models and girls are happy
+ Good Photographer
+ like fan blowing hair look for pictures
+ Has special wand toy for masturbation and girls like
+ Picture and video quality good
+ HD Video is very nice
Cons: - Obscesson with one model, to much of same model
- Video work shaky sometimes with bad or mistake edits
- small updates or missing updates
- not enough varity in photo sets and video work follows same plan
- photosets are to soft with little progresson in update
- not enough new models
Bottom Line: Ron Harris site has really extra pretty models but not enough different models. Recent site changed to daily update and no image correction. But some daily updates are short video clip only and not full video sceens. Other daily updates may be 10-20 pictures that seem to all look like the same pose or little pose change. Before pictures had to much image correction to make models look fake with smooth airbrushed vaginas. Now some look too many red bumps and raser burn. There shuold be something in between to have girls look nice but real.

Site went week or more with no updates but says daily update. I think there may be problems at company. Plus way to many updates of same model and not enough explicit of her. No more Kara please Ron. She is pretty but too much the same.

Bottom line is I leave site wanting more. More explicit, more updates, more change. I will be cancelling membership because lately many updates was missed and too much the same. This is slightly better than average site. I joined because of pretty girls took me in but when in members section my need is not full filled.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (2)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

PinkPanther (46) This site does some great stuff, but has some real negatives for me:

1) The excess photo-shopping/painting of images - frequently takes all the erotic charge out of the pics

2) Ron himself ruins many vids. He's not a guy that tends to get women to want to get sexy. He has sexy models and if he just turned on the camera and pretended he didn't exist and focused on the camera work, the site would be hotter than it is. Nobody - including the models, it seems - wants to hear him talking.

12-05-07  05:36pm

Reply To Message

2

Drooler (218) I've been a member a couple of times, and I also felt the site was lacking. I don't like the small updates and the repetitive way he does things. Plus you pointed out that it went a week without updates.

This site has always been inconsistent in that way, in my experience.

Also, I thought the webmastering was really, really poor with lots of new windows opening, among other problems. It can get really confusing.

What you said really reminded me of how I experienced the site, too.

12-10-07  04:30pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.