Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan (2)
Active
75
qualsite34 (33) 11-26-07  04:16pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (29), NO (2)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Excellent photo quality
Excellent high definition video quality (Later shoots)
Attractive Babe type girls
Regular updates
Cons: Vaginal shots are garish (Candy red) which is very unnatural looking.
Excessive focus on fisting
Many older videos are flagged as no longer available
Bottom Line: This site really is taste dependent. You have to like candy red vaginal shots and excessive fisting which I don't. Also, for some reason, many of the older videos are shown as no longer available for viewing. I guess the site owners don't want to spring for the extra cost of storage.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

 Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

 PosterDude (14) Do not beleve review. This site is one of best on
the internet. I joined over 100 site in 10 years and this site has best girls, best video, best picture quality. Some shots are very vaginal, that is true. Most shots are glamure. He must not be member, old videos are available.

This persons review is not to be trusted. Look at other reviews.
 11-27-07  05:22am

Reply To Message

2

 qualsite34 (33) REPLY TO #1 - PosterDude :

Best is an objective term. My review implies the same. If you like tons and tons of garish red cherry vaginal shots and fisting. I would recommend the site to anyone who favors this style. However, I have to mention, there are few sites that tease the subscriber by showing numerous videos which are no longer available. To make it worse, they give you a link to another website where you can view the videos - for an extra fee. It is the purpose of this website to help others decide whether or not they should subscribe to the various offerings out there.
 11-27-07  02:58pm

Reply To Message

3

 Davit (46) REPLY TO #2 - qualsite34 :

You said 'best is an objective term'. For something like porn, that relies on personal tastes, I would suggest it is entirely subjective.
 01-11-08  05:40pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.