Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Newbie Nudes

Newbie Nudes (0)
Active
73
asmith12 (124) 11-24-07  03:38am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (53), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + free membership
+ premium membership is non-recurring
+ lots of new pictures daily
+ "nudles": ability to get premium membership for "free" (for clicks that lead to their site)
+ rating system which does work
+ profiles
+ community-oriented features (blogs, chat, forum)
Cons: - upsells of premium membership (including pop-ups, yuck!)
- upsells of all other things EVERYEHERE
- premium membership at $27.95 is way too expensive for the content that costs site owners nothing
- quality of pictures is way too amateurish even for amateur site
- no scenarios, just single pictures
- content is rather repetitive
Bottom Line: After all deliberations (see comments to IDoctor's review) I've decided to take a look myself to provide not that biased review.

First of all, quality of pictures is way too amateurish even for free amateur-submitted stuff (TBP reviews say "quality varies" - come on, quality just plain sucks; what kind of picture quality can you expect if a girl shoots herself in a mirror in her bathroom?).

As for the content of the pictures - some pictures are outright ugly, some of better ones are obviously stolen from paysites (come on, girl won't do DP with this kind of professional lighting in private life), and it leaves us with not that much decent ones. Fortunately, rating system seems to really work and those pictures that make it up to the top, are of better content (no dicks), but quality still sucks.

So (as messmer have already said in his comment) it doesn't make ANY sense to go there for pictures. On the other hand, as a COMMUNITY site it's not bad at all. Community is large, active, site provides most of the features needed for such a community.

Bottom line: if you're looking for pictures and you're NOT into amateur pictures of real girls (with profiles) of dubious quality, STAY AWAY. On the other hand, if you're looking for a community of exhibitionists - it's not a bad choice. As a result of this dual nature, I've had trouble with putting single rating for the site, so I've decided to rate it as 60 for pictures and as 85 for community, and take average.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

 Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

 Distant Lover (0) I simply disagree with you about the quality of the photographs. Sure, a lot of them are unappealing, but some are of breath taking loveliness. I dislike anything that is hard core. Other people, obviously, are attracted to that. One of the many things I love about NewbieNudes is that there is plenty there for everyone and every taste.

The fact that the frequently beautiful women who do submit photographs do so because they enjoy sharing their loveliness and not because they are paid to is an additional source of erotic appeal for me. When the beautiful women in the photographs submit comments and thread on the Forum I am able to appreciate their beautiful minds.
 11-24-07  08:46am

Reply To Message

2

 asmith12 (124) REPLY TO #1 - Distant Lover :

I've tried to make a distinction between photo content and photo quality. And while content can be different (which I've mentioned), technical photo quality (focus, lighting, color balance etc.) just plain sucks (I'm not sure that I've seen one picture with a good technical quality except for those obviously stolen from porno sites).
 11-24-07  08:51am

Reply To Message

3

 messmer (137) REPLY TO #1 - Distant Lover :

The girls of breathtaking loveliness may be there but are awfully hard to find and chances are when you do find them their faces are masked. The bulk of the pictures is from the breasts, or waist, down and they lack eroticism in their sameness and very amateurish quality. I, too, am not a fan of hard core but there is simply nothing there that would excite or tantalize me erotically. Of course, tastes differ and as asmith12 points out the community aspect might very well make up for what the picture section is lacking. I am glad you have found something that captured your attention, it wouldn't be for me.
 11-24-07  09:09am

Reply To Message

4

 Apple (0) this is a totally reasonable review. the best best best pictures tend to hover in the high 8 ratings, because there are evidently people who fly through voting down pictures as they get to the top. also scenarios are more common if you look at individual galleries. i think maybe it doesn't make a ton of sense to have a profile here, because NN isn't *exactly* porn. like you said, asmith... it's more of a community. and, in fact, the home page calls it "amateur nude community."

thanks for giving it a shot, though! :)
 11-25-07  09:23am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.