| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Aunt Judy's
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from messmer:
(Advent's Reply)
Just a parting remark, Advent: I have removed all references to the reducing speed in my comment. No answer required.
|
09-10-12 12:22pm
|
Reply
2
|
Aunt Judy's
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(Advent's Reply)
Thanks,as always, Advent.
You are right I did not take into consideration that you receive your material from various providers when I wrote my complaint about a blurry 1080p video.
All the specifications were exactly as you described but the end result was not true HD, at least not to the eye. This videographer should be told to either adjust his focus or get himself a new camera or some software that allows him to sharpen a video after the fact. If there is such a thing.
I also agree with you about the matter of reducing speed during a download. It hasn't happened again and I've happily downloaded at my usual 2.34 MB/s.
The problems of navigating within the site were real enough, though. I've had an extremely slow server on more than one occasion.
Thanks again, and, as usual, it is a pleasure to be able to voice misgivings without a webmaster getting defensive over it. You are in the right spot. May they always keep you (if you are an employee rather than an owner) and give you regular raises!
|
09-10-12 11:53am
|
Reply
3
|
Aunt Judy's
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Advent's Reply)
Thanks as always for your courteous response to some of my beefs, Melissa. This is exactly how I feel, that you are "still working on getting the site in good working order." I have started to look at it as a work in progress and, as I wrote, expect nothing but the best down the road.
However in the meantime, there are other glitches as well that I didn't mention: Yesterday I tried to create a custom zip .. in vain .. because I had to give up after five minutes of waiting. Trying to open a picture in High Resolution also took ages. Still having server problems?
But there is nothing but good will here so I just tell myself that you are busy fine tuning things and don't normally get irate over it.
I think my discontent behind the comment is, more than anything, rooted in my disappointment with the updates since ATK took over.
Not the quality so much, even though today's video disappointed me because it was so blurry, but because there has been nothing that even comes close to my favorite niche, which happens to be a nice leisurely strip out of more than just three - four items of clothing.
I somehow expected to see dresses and lots of lingerie and stockings etc. on mature women, yet most appear to dress like young girls .. casual and commando!
Anyway, I realize that's MY taste and if others like what's being presented then I'll lay off and let them have their fun without any more whining.
Thanks again for taking the time to reply.
|
09-05-12 06:51pm
|
Reply
4
|
Aunt Judy's
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Advent's Reply)
I am really excited about the 1080p HD video offered today, Advent. This was my constant complaint about AJ/Older Women: their videos were just plain c..p! It was a mature site with so much potential and I had been a frequent subscriber in the past until I gave up on them because their photo sets became uninspired and their videos never improved from their 640x480 format. And they had the nerve to call them HD! Now if you could only get your photographers to use more lingerie with their models! :-)
|
08-28-12 10:46am
|
Reply
5
|
Aunt Judy's
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(Advent's Reply)
I was very happy to hear about the changes, Advent. Things can only improve because the original AJ had stood still while everyone else moved on. For lovers of mature contents this is indeed pleasant news. It also won't hurt to see the site in ATKs more appealing (and familiar) format.
|
08-28-12 09:41am
|
Reply
6
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(Advent's Reply)
Thanks for putting the idea forward.
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-16-12 03:32pm
|
Reply
7
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(Advent's Reply)
That is OK.
Glad you are still around.
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-16-12 03:31pm
|
Reply
8
|
ATK Premium
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Capn:
(Advent's Reply)
What sort of 'glam' are you talking of...
Is that mainstream glamour/play wear or elegant outfits?
Thanks,
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-02-12 12:39pm
|
Reply
9
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(Advent's Reply)
Is there any chance of a broader coverage in the Archive site?
Material from Exotics & Premium would be more of a draw, along with Petites in due time. ;0)
Then it would live up to it's name.
Whilst I am on a roll, how about a mature ladies site?
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-02-12 12:35pm
|
Reply
10
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(5)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from monty4321:
(Advent's Reply)
This might be a little different. But there are times when I stay away from an ATK sight for awhile, then I would go back in case there was anything new. But I would hesitate about which ATK sight to join because I'm afraid of being disappointed. If there was some kind of 2 sites for 1 deal, or maybe an extra 5 bucks for second site - there's a better chance that I would bite. Because most of the time I would just shy away, and I never pay for more than one site per month, I only get a membership maybe once every 3-4 months.
|
07-17-11 08:16pm
|
Reply
11
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(Advent's Reply)
I'll add that I e-mailed "support@amkingdom.com" right at the start of the hour when I was unable to log in - still no response 3+hours later.
So a major fail by ATK for this member.
|
06-29-11 09:17pm
|
Reply
12
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(Advent's Reply)
Nope - not a bit - I saw nothing but the clock showing that I had no more time to wait for it. Not any thrill, I'll tell ya. My cache should have been pretty fresh since I had just turned my computer on just minutes before the show, not like I'd used up my memory for hours.
|
06-29-11 08:29pm
|
Reply
13
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(5)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(Advent's Reply)
Hurray!
Cap'n. :0)
|
06-14-11 12:14pm
|
Reply
14
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(5)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Capn:
(Advent's Reply)
Despite the major revamp ( largely a hit with me) there are STILL no custom zips.
This has been an outstanding request for well over a year now.
Somewhen never?
Cap'n :0(
|
06-03-11 06:59pm
|
Reply
15
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(5)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from 2 Free K:
(Advent's Reply)
Anytime. I must add, too, that I appreciate the effort you've been putting into making the ATK sites as good as possible. Great customer service, great interviews, and great value for the dollar - keep it up! Karups and Nubiles try to cop your style, but ATK gives so much more, thus my allegiance is strong. The old folks have Playboy, I have ATK.
|
06-03-11 08:34am
|
Reply
16
|
ATK Exotics
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(Advent's Reply)
Ok, thanks. Nice to hear that improvements are coming.
All the best ...
|
04-05-11 06:54pm
|
Reply
17
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Advent's News
from Douggie:
Wow, Was looking forward to knocking out several reviews but figured I should give your company the benefit of the doubt and wait.
I have been a member for less than a week and only had 1 evening that your site worked. Its been down all weekend...sent several messages with no reply.
I tried to join your forum so I could let you guys know that way and the required verification email never came through.
I noticed your site says its running with a beta program....ehem, almost 2 years? What is the three stooges your tech people?
To be honest and the reason for my delay in rating is this....
The ATK movie site...2 year beta testing or not. Is the worse site I have ever been to. I can deal with the expense part. I have never been to a site that runs, is set up or has been out of commission like this. All this BS from a high fee site? EVERY free site features better streams, Better search functions and 100% more reliability.
The pros:
It has a video only format
Lots of videos
Cons:
The site is SLOW...Im not talking "Man I wish this site were faster" slow...Im talking Pounding my head on the desk screaming "WTF is this so damn slow" Slow.
Mega gateway Errors. YUP...havent seen them for years. But get them numerous times from this site.
Almost 2 years of Beta testing? Common!
Only offer (and the customer pays a lot for) stream. The problem is the download is so slow that theres a little black rebuffering box that is on the video 1/2 the time.
Tech Support....Well that goes along with the overal site..Its been over 4 days and I havent heard back from you...site has been down 4 out of 5 days now.
Search engine...There is a ton of work that needs to be done with it.
OVERALL, I cant justify your fees. Inshort (out of space) Its the WORSE site I have ever been to. With possibilites of being one of the best. But that being said...will it happen in this millenia?
|
02-15-11 01:02am
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Advent's News
from Douggie:
Hello melissa,
I just previewed this site and it looks interesting.
A few thing I noticed that couls use improvement.
1) To be honest, the fees are rather high. If I were to go with the minimum. I would be able to watch aproximately 5 movies. Granted most are exclusive. But Ive seen some that arent. With the little detail given whats to say the video Im about to watch is what Im actually looking for?
2) The search engine is less than mediocre. You either have the ability to look at a very broad search...like for instance masturbation. You end up with more then just what youre searching for. Or hope that its in the title....my search was vibrator (5 pages) what I know theres a ton more. magic wand Which pulled up one. Or massager that pulled up about 5.
I realize its about making money. But for 20.00 I would expect to have the ability to search and play for most an evening. Although you have a ton of content and this style of billing may work at other sites. I think your company would be better off billing a 30-40.00 monthly fee.
Im sure youve heard this before....The site is slow. I read somewhere that youve combined all your sites to one server. That wouldnt be an issue if I had a whole month to view the movies.
Overall I think youre site is on the right track. That is without actually viewing the content. At this point, Im kind of scared to join. With billing like that, I could see myself dropping 100.00 an evening.
Any discounted deals going on? Like the first time mebers get 40 crowns with the 20.00 purchase?
|
02-07-11 11:31pm
|
Reply
19
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(Advent's Reply)
I suppose given that we now have a Sunday photo update, photo lovers aren't actually losing out on updates.
Cap'n. :0/
|
01-21-11 04:03am
|
Reply
20
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(5)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(Advent's Reply)
OK Thanks for the update.....
I'll keep waiting then. :0/
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-24-10 10:15am
|
Reply
21
|
ATK Petites
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#9
from PinkPanther:
(Advent's Reply)
No problem, Advent - you've got good sites and I'm glad to give suggestions that I hope will help make them even better.
One other thing I was thinking about - I had been looking at the preview of ATK Premium and was rather surprised that all of the pics that I checked out in the preview had a copyright date of 2005. Someone checking out that site could easily reach a conclusion that ATK Premium is a site that hasn't updated in years. You might want to pass on a suggestion that you would be well-served by freshening those pics up on a regular basis to give potential members a more realistic impression of the life of the site.
Take care
|
03-30-10 10:21pm
|
Reply
22
|
ATK Petites
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from PinkPanther:
(Advent's Reply)
The current design of the site seems to be one that hides the content rather than pointing members to the content - rather than all the "View More" huge buttons, when it comes to individual models, you might want to even have a count of the "more" that is in that direction.
The other thing is that the thumbnails frequently don't look good, then when you click on the pic, I'm amazed at how hot the pics are - I'm looking at the site now, and there's a blurry-looking pic of Lexi in the "Bonus Photos" area - doesn't look particularly inviting, but when I click on it, the gallery pics show just how freaking hot she is - and then I have to click through several more screens to see how much content you have of her - you've got a dozen galleries of this incredibly hot babe - and 5 vids - but finding that out takes a lot of clicking through screens that show a portion of the content and don't give you much info on what else there is.
There's also a design problem in the way that the vids and photos are designated. I look at the way things are presented and I'm constantly wondering - Is this where the photos are or is this where the movies are? It's just rather confusing.
But, as I said in my topic of this comment, despite the confusion, what makes or breaks a site is whether or not it has good content - and this one has quite a bit of good content - it's just not presented in the easiest way to be able to find it.
|
03-30-10 07:23pm
|
Reply
23
|
ATK Petites
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Capn:
(Advent's Reply)
User Defined Custom Zips ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
03-30-10 09:32am
|
Reply
24
|
ATK Petites
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(Advent's Reply)
Here's a summary of pointers (mostly from the long post I'd make about Petites, but was in the Galleria review section at PU):
1. Use a clearer color scheme. It shouldn't distract so much. Use a lighter background and darker text for links.
2. Make it work for 1024x768 and other lower screen resolutions so no horizontal scrolling is needed. Web pages should always be completely visible from the left to the right side of any screen.
3. Organize more clearly. Put ONLY the exclusive model material in one section, and the "from other ATK sites" material in another.
Those things alone would really improve the design, IMHO.
And (I'll add): Get better photographers who do things like Suzy Black, ATK Galleria, 77 babes 4, 78 babes 1, and 78 uniforms 2. That stuff was GREAT! I think it's a shame how fine looking girls like Amia Moretti and Sammi Rhodes are showing up for what turn out to be mediocre photo shoots.
|
03-30-10 09:17am
|
Reply
25
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(Advent's Reply)
I thought that might have been the case.
I have sent you an e-mither! ;0)
Cap'n. :0)
|
02-24-10 04:48pm
|
