Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
Webmaster : True Alex (4)

View Feedback:   Replies (9)         Other:   Site Feedback (86)   |   Replies Received (8)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-8 of 8  

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Skokoff

Skokoff
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from lk2fireone: (True Alex's Reply)

Agreed, some very attractive models.

08-31-10  06:28pm

Reply
2
Visit Skokoff

Skokoff
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from Denner: (True Alex's Reply)

BTW: Are you planing to do something about the currency-issue.
At TBP it states $ 29.95 - but when I try to join (via CCBill) I have to pay Euro: 29.95 - (and Segpay won't let me in)...


06-20-09  03:03am

Reply
3
Visit Skokoff

Skokoff
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from exotics4me: (True Alex's Reply)

Blame Drooler, he made me do it! Seriously Alex, wouldn't you rather us joke around AND point out the mistakes, instead of cussing you and your site out over mistakes? I've noticed that many sites have taken the comments left here and put them to good use in improving their site, plus we all get a chance to laugh a little. And if you fire everyone, who will be checking your work?

06-19-09  07:47am

Reply
4
Visit Skokoff

Skokoff
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from jd1961: (True Alex's Reply)

Sure

12-02-08  09:18am

Reply
5
Visit Skokoff

Skokoff
(0)
REPLY TO #12 from Drooler: (True Alex's Reply)

Aha! Well, there ya go! And believe me, I know what it's like. I have to work with data myself coming from a variety of sources, too, and there's always a chance that someone will not have been watching what they were doing. And guess who gets called on it? So I've learned from the School of Hard Knocks to check things before they get seen by the higher-ups. And to have a little talk with the error-prone upon whom I must depend, like it or not.

11-23-08  06:39am

Reply
6
Visit Skokoff

Skokoff
(0)
REPLY TO #10 from Drooler: (True Alex's Reply)

Well, I certainly wouldn't say "ruined." "Tainted," perhaps?

And I wonder if it was the scripts, or was it what was fed into them? You only need one file name that doesn't fit the variables that the script was intended to handle for things to go awry. After all, if you used the same scripts for every gallery, it's probably the input that's the problem, since some of the galleries had no problems at all.

Well, good luck! You folks are getting right to the problems immediately. I'm very positively impressed by that, as I'm sure other readers are.

Oh, I just remembered something which you might consider in the future when you have more time: Is there any way that you can give unique names to the zips for the different pic sizes by, for example, putting an "-s" in the zip file name for the 1000px zips, and an "-m" for the 2500px? Right now, all of the zips for a given gallery have identical file names, and some of us might download more than one size. Some other sites do that, and it's a pro when they do.


11-23-08  06:17am

Reply
7
Visit Skokoff

Skokoff
(0)
REPLY TO #6 from Toadsith: (True Alex's Reply)

Good to know! The Canon 5D is a very respectable camera and usually doesn't exhibit that massive amount of noise seen in the high res samples nor the auto focus mishaps. I wish I could afford a camera of such a level. If he is Canon fan, that would no doubt explain the noise produced by the older camera.

So please do update those high res samples! I doubt I'm the only photography freak that would be worried by those. Thanks to your response however, I will be moving the site up to high priority for review as I do like Skokoff's style in choice of models, poses and sets as shown on the preview pages.

Also, it is always nice to see that webmasters do take notice to the site. Cheers!


11-23-08  05:15am

Reply
8
Visit Skokoff

Skokoff
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from Drooler: (True Alex's Reply)

Hi Alex. Thanks for getting back so quickly and in such detail. I think if you have a page or site editing program that can check for broken links, it will give you a list.

I review sites expecting them to work. Sure, it's being strict, but I regard them as I would any other products for sale. It's what I as a consumer have purchased, as would others.

Surely you have seen the latest gallery of Natasha, just today. Once again, many of the thumbs were nothing but X's. I suggest carefully checking every gallery for errors before posting it. Then you won't have any problems. And what I don't understand is why this isn't common, routine practice on some web sites.

But I'll revise the review and increase the score after the problems get fixed. I might wait a week, but in the meantime you can post here that you've already fixed them so that others interested in the site will already know.

Thanks again for getting back to me. As I said in the review, I like the site, and as you said, the problems are only technical.


11-23-08  05:02am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-8 of 8  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.6 seconds.