Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Reply
With respect, you guys misunderstand our message. We don't deny we're porn - but we're GOOD porn. No faking, no lies about the quality and quantity of our content, genuine amateurs (mostly, a couple of our girls do mainstream porn as well), and high production values. And to the original poster, our stand on ethics isn't related to the content - it's how it's made, how the women are treated and paid, and the values represented. We don't judge people for their sexual perversions and in fact we dabble in them on the site from time to time, where the restrictions of the laws in our country allow. And we certainly aren't intolerant of any sexual act or flavour, you're quite wrong about that. Any consensual sex is fine with us (animals and children aside) but a lot of gonzo porn purports to show non consenting women, and we'd put that in the 'bad porn' basket as well, notwithstanding that it's fake. It's educating our kids, after all.
|
04-13-13 06:22pm
|
Reply
2
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
You say "Joining is like to be getting a member of some special community which despises the watcher of "common" porn." That's partly true - Ifeelmyself IS a special community because the people you are watching masturbate are just ordinary girls and women, they aren't porn actresses (though some do appear on other sites we refer them to). When you watch a porn actress masturbate to simulated orgasm, you're keeping her in a job. (If you pay for your membership that is). On our site your'e privildeged to watch what these girls let you see, which is their real masturbation to genuine orgasm. And then, you can chat with some of them on the forum. They are not professionals but they are paid (more than ost pros for a similar shoot) and part of your membership fee also goes to paying per-click bonuses.
It's true that ours isn't a porn fantasy site, so you won't see a frustrated milf fucking herself with the mixmaster on the kitchen bench, or the hot co-eds molesting the pizza guy. That stuff is all over the internet, we're here to provide an alternative. If you want a caffeine fix you go to Starbucks but if you're a real coffee lover you find a cafe with a good barista that roasts their own beans. It's the same with porn.
But actually we do fantasy sometimes, but we do *thier* fantasy, not yours, and we think that's much more interesting. Like Strawberry masturbating while suspended by ropes, or Emile fantasising about being examined by an old school gynaecologist.
If you've observed so far that there isn't much variation then I guess you haven't seen the girl fucking herself with her deodorant, or on the railway bridge at sunset, standing by the window watching somebody outside, at her office desk watching porn after hours, on the train (which she filmed herself) - these things really do happen, these girls told us so, so we recreated them and here they are. No apologies for some same-ness of location, we have a studio for the first shoot with each girl and it has a darkened background so you can concentrate on watching the subtle things that comprise real masturbation and orgasm.
I especially like what you say, "I've never seen such glorification on any other site" - but it's the way it should always have been.
|
03-20-12 05:41pm
|
Reply
3
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
nickN's Reply
Now you're putting words in my mouth - I didn't attribute that maxim to you.
ITV is funded either by advertising or taxpayers and leverage a huge audience off their TV broadcast base. They have a massive economy of scale, including other networks who are sharing the production costs. It's a completely different (and much larger) business model, which is why porn sites have to charge subscriptions. And we are by no means at the upper end of the rate scale - in fact for 100% exclusive, HD content update almost daily, we're cheap. There are of course networks which steal content and make their money from obnoxious advertising, a lot more money than we make.
If your speed problem was a network issue it should have resolved itself by now. Please contact me again through our Help system, or reply to a previous support email, and we'll run some tests from our end.
|
05-17-11 06:36pm
|
Reply
4
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
nickN's Reply
If you read my replies you'll see that I am not disregarding anyone's opinion; I am correcting the facts.
We (and that includes the editors, administrators, production assistants) are dedicated to our customers needs. But if you don't like reality, I mean actual reality rather than gonzo, then you probably shouldn't be a customer. I keep saying this - if you don't like our content, if it's not what does it for you, then you are better off at a mainstream porn site. But we have huge repeat business from people who like what we do, and appreciate our effort to keep the standards high.
|
05-16-11 07:10pm
|
Reply
5
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Thanks for the update to your review, but it still contains some inaccuracies, e.g. that the 'digging' technique is done for effect. That's what some girls do. We film what they do.
|
05-16-11 07:03pm
|
Reply
6
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
nickN's Reply
Well if you re-read your review, you will have to agree that all your criticisms of our site are in fact related to your own expectations, based, most probably, on your extensive experience in mainstream porn. Your review was ill-informed on every front, as I pointed out in my reply at the time. So the maxim "the customer is always right" is nearly always wrong - you made incorrect statements because you commented without first acquainting yourself with the site's mission, or looking thoroughly at the site. I'm not going to piss in your pocket for your holy dollar dude. If you like to see real women having real orgasms, then join pour site and be assured of consistent quality, high speeds, good customer service and 100% uptime. (As close as you can get). If you prefer to see actresses who have been artificially enhanced to look like some 'ideal' woman, trying to impress you with more squeals, groans and bigger dildos, then stick with mainstream porn.
|
05-16-11 06:49pm
|
Reply
7
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
I'm not a diplomat I'm a pornographer. Nor do I work for ifeelmyself, I own it. It's my passion and my livelihood and I spend the largest part of my life producing the best website with the best videos on this topic, on the whole internet (not really disputed by anybody). So when an ill-informed self-appointed expert on female masturbation comes along and says our site is only worth 3/10 because (a) he had a temporary network issue not related to our site and (b) he doesn't actually know anything about how women actually masturbate, let alone anything about video delivery and networks, then I have nothing positive to say to him. I am not here to be liked, I am here to make the best erotica on the internet.
|
05-16-11 01:23am
|
Reply
8
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
nickN's Comment
The reason clips play and buffer so quickly on Tube sites is because they are resampled and compressed to make the files much, much smaller - and the quality obviously far inferior.
We have well connected servers in the USA and NL running way under capacity and no ongoing complaints about speed. Occasional network blockages affect every web site from time to time and they are specific to certain users due to the chain of computers between the two sites. Typically you will go through about 8 to 20 computers when you connect to any site. If you have experienced such a connection problem you shoudl have reported it to your ISP, though typically they will wait for the problem to resolve itself. That is the internet.
As for your criticisms about the 'pose', this is due to your steady diet of fake porn. Most girls masturbate quietly on their backs. Our contributors are not models, they are not directed; our clips document the real thing. If you would rather see models or actresses squirm and squeal, get up on all fours while looking back to the camera and inserting a huge dildo, then stick with acted porn, as that is not how anybody masturbates for pleasure. As we point out utterly clearly on our site, we are in the business of presenting reality. And life does not always imitate 'art'.
Thanks for tipping us off to the copyright infringement, we will deal with that.
|
05-14-11 08:38am
|
Reply
9
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Ok it's fine to have personal preferences, we all do, but in writing a pub;ic review it's more useful to others if you describe the content objectively and then you can discuss your tastes. Otherwise you're coming from the point of view that some girls are "correct" and some are "incorrect". These are people you're talking about, and what might be "badly proportioned" to you is "ideal" for others.
In this post (para 3) you have non specific criticisms of some technical features, where it would be much more helpful if you outlined what they are, preferably using our Contact form to give us some constructive feedback.
Thankyou.
|
01-02-11 04:47pm
|
Reply
10
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Not all girls are most comfortable on their back. On Ifeelmyself we film girls doing it their way, so if you see a girl on her tummy, or standing, then that's what she prefers, it's more natural for her. We don't instruct them.
|
01-02-11 04:40pm
|
Reply
11
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
There is a "disturbing" deficit of glamor because that is exactly our purpose. Our contributors are not models. Our site is about real people as relief from mainstream porn. This is explained in the "about" section so you need not join looking for the same old cliche. That is all over the internet.
"There are an annoying number of other promoted sites splashed about" is in fact TWO static advertisements to OUR other sites on the front page sidebar. I think you would struggle to find a porn site with less advertising!
Also we do not pair girls together. The couples on our site are friends or lovers who have requested to do a shoot together.
As far as dicounts go, you could have taken a 90 day subscription at a hefty discount off the 30 day rate. I don't know what other discount you'd expect unless you join with a promotional offer, which for obvious reasons are not given away on the site itself. The update schedule you can't figure out is actually daily, at exactly the same time, and all releases are dated so you can verify that.
Thanks for a mostly positive review but if you had read our credo and understood our purpose, and been a bit more thorough with your exploration, you would probably have no criticisms at all.
|
01-01-11 04:40pm
|
Reply
12
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
There are still a few videos left that were recorded on tape in SD, and they're being released in the smaller sizes. They'll soon run out. One was labelled incorrectly as HD but it's fixed now.
Your asserion: "Telling someone it's none of your business why they've done something they've done or that the download limit "only bothers people who are sucking the site dry" is just the kind of thing that reminds me that porn is a business, nothing more"
is incorrect and logically flawed. If we were 'just a business', if we ran our site like the vast majority of porn sites, then we wouldn't ever remove content for personal reasons of the contributor, and you wouldn't have needed to ask the question. You can probably guess as to some of the reasons that might apply, and the welfare and privacy of the contributors is our first concern. If we lose you as a member because you're offended that we won't share that info with you, so be it. Precisely because we don't run this site ruthlessly as a business, we aren't subservient to your almighty dollar, even though you do give us a great review (thanks for that!)
The download limits allow you to get about 8~10 HD videos a day. If you can use more than that, you should put yourself up for scientific study. Without the limit we would have to raise our prices because we have a huge amount of video, not subsidised by advertising, and you can thank the people who plug in, suck out a hundred gig then cancel.
|
09-07-09 07:11pm
|
Reply
13
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
ChuckW's Reply
But they aren't models and they aren't posing. We ask them how they like to do it, and film that as best we can. There have been other videos of girls standing, not nearly as popular and never get mentioned so perhaps it's becuase Cle is unutterably gorgeous :) However check out Chica's latest contri, I think you will like that.
|
08-14-09 06:26pm
|
Reply
14
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
Xororos's Reply
The "Shoot Yourself" link is where users submit - we ask for samples first to weed out the dross, guys pimping out their girlfriends or sending pics downloaded form other sites. If you follow the link and read the procedure you'll see it clearly isn't an invitation to 'model for us'. All the folios are shot by the girls themselves, though obviously we aren't there to see if any might be getting a little help om their friend. We presume it happens occasionally.
|
08-11-09 01:04am
|
Reply
15
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
If you mean we don't have pussy closeups with a ringlight around the lens, then yup, we don't. But if you think we aren't showing you the orgasms, I'm not sure what you're looking at!
|
08-11-09 12:53am
|
Reply
16
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
I think you're missing the point, that IFM is about authenticity. We get that by respecting our contributors and filming them the way they actually masturbate. A few have unusual techniques and those are the often the most interesting videos, I agree. But we're not going to tell a girl to hump the dishwasher or get off with a coke bottle, if that's not what she does. What we look for are genuine, intense orgasms, and I believe we're the only site that delivers that nearly all the time (who can make 100% guarantees after all).
If a video was removed you can be sure there was a very good reaason and actually it's not the business of any of our members. Nor will we tell you any lies, we ignore such requests as a matter of policy and that's not inconsistent with a high level of customer service. Thanks for your very positive comments, we hope to see you back.
|
08-11-09 12:51am
|
Reply
17
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
ChuckW's Comment
Chuck, the point of IFM is to show us how girls really masturbate, and the orgasms are real. We don't tell the girls how to do it, we film them doing it their way. There are plenty of sites out there with girls playing with themselves in all sorts of wacky setupps but if you think they're actually masturbating or having orgasms, I hate to disappoint you...
However it is not true that 99% of girls are on their back on our site. It's probably more like 80%. That's just what girls do.
|
08-11-09 12:43am
|
Reply
18
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
The WMV files aren't the highest res, use the MP4's which are a universal format. Teh file sizes are given, you don't need to join to see that. the 3G limit is per day, which is a hell of a lot of data so it only bothers people who are sucking the site dry.
|
08-11-09 12:38am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.41 seconds.
|
|
