Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
abbywinters
(5)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
We've required JS be enabled for the last 18 months, and this is the first time we have heard of it being an issue for ANYONE.
JS is a fact of life on the internet, and there is no conceivable reason for it to be disabled on users browser (some misinformed people believe it's "safer" to have it disabled, but this has been proven many times over to be irrelevant. If you want to be THAT safe, don't use the Internet!).
|
09-20-07 07:53pm
|
Reply
27
|
abbywinters
(5)
|
Reply of
Thrillhouse85's Review
Thrillhouse85, Thanks for the kind words! However, I must say that our servers are located in Dallas, Texas, and we're about to add a full mirror in the Netherlands.
The site is not slow for all North American users (as several people here have mentioned, and as our tens of thousands of North American customers experience daily), just the one who wrote this review.
Thrillhouse85, please email me on abby@abbywinters.com , so we can offer some advice about your speed issue (or at the least, explain why it might be happening).
|
07-21-07 08:32pm
|
Reply
28
|
abbywinters
(5)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
dreading it why?
|
07-05-07 09:11pm
|
Reply
29
|
abbywinters
(5)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
From our FAQ: Hey, how come a bunch of pics in each model's gallery look the same? You're ripping me off!
Actually, we're not ripping you off. This is a style of shooting that many of our customers enjoy, and does not appear to be done any place else we have seen.
What happens is this: We sometimes lock off the (stills) camera on a tripod, compose the shot carefully, and get the model to perform an action - say inserting and removing a dildo. Then, we take a pic at between three and eight frames every second, recording the action as she performs it.
If you download these images (as a zip is the easiest way), and use an image viewing program that allows you to press a single key to page through the images (you might want to choose to view our images full screen, "fit to screen"), you get an extremely high-quality "movie".
This allows you - in this example - to see what happens to each individual pubic hair, fold of skin, tiny muscle, and dollop of girlcum in the best possible quality and largest amount of detail.
Perhaps this is all a bit too explicit or "clinical" for you? Sure, we understand not everyone wants to see this kinda stuff, so we do the same thing for other actions as well, like a model taking her top off (seeing her tummy muscles and skin and breasts all move about is fascinating, we think!), or exercising, or rubbing lotion all over herself, or two models kissing passionately.
Some people think this is a waste of... something. They never can seem to tell us what, but we always say two things to them:
First, if you prefer, you can treat these sequences as a free bonus that you choose not to enjoy. They are not something we charge you extra for, we just add them into the set because we think they look cool, and we get a lot of positive feedback from customers.
Second, we provide many different options to download files from our site - entire set zips, entire page zips, custom zips you make yourself, or just single files you can choose to save on their own. If you want to skip these sequences, go right ahead. We ensure the sets look fine without them.
|
07-04-07 04:49pm
|
Reply
30
|
abbywinters
(5)
|
Reply of
ramscrota's Review
Clearly, my site is not for you. Hairy models is a forte of ours - we'd never encourage them to trim. There are plenty of places out there that DO have trimmed models - we're not competing with them.
|
07-04-07 04:49pm
|
Reply
31
|
abbywinters
(5)
|
Reply of
Online Skeptic 's Comment
Hey, it'd be good to know specifically what it is you don't like about the site. You don't mention anything except for how much you dislike it - that's not very helpful?
|
06-23-07 03:50pm
|
Reply
32
|
abbywinters
(5)
|
Reply of
joe3412's Review
Heyy Joe, just wanted to mention that in fact, none of our models have makeup on.
|
06-20-07 04:26pm
|
Reply
33
|
abbywinters
(5)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
Snowdude, we may be adding more girl-boy shoots in the future, but at a very low rate - no more than one a year.
They are not what this site is about. Sorry.
|
01-31-07 02:05pm
|
Reply
34
|
abbywinters
(5)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Review
uh, we do have a standard price option that includes all. $30 for one month, or $45 for three months!
|
01-26-07 09:52pm
|
Reply
35
|
abbywinters
(5)
|
Reply of
powerman's Review
we do split up our videos, but not as much as exemplar67 implies. Segments are beteen 8 and 20 minutes, file sizes between 60 and 300 Mb.
|
01-22-07 07:39pm
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PU Announcement on 01-20-07
I reckon this is a great move, too.
|
01-22-07 04:30pm
|
Reply
37
|
abbywinters
(5)
|
Reply of
BDickuss's Comment
BDickuss posted above that we divide our videos into shorter segments. We do do this (between 7 and 15 mins for new videos, older ones are between 3 and 5 mins, as less people had broadband in those days).
We do get complaints about this, but we get just as many complaints that the segments we break videos down into are too BIG, and we should break them up more! It's a tough problem, and there's no easy solution.
We already have two versions of every video (WMV and MPG), making even more is a LOT of work, and we prefer to spend our energy on making new content, rather than providing our existing content in dozens of different formats and lengths.
To fix these problems (and address some other ones), we're going to be adding a streaming format to our site (possibly flash video), which will allow users to jump around a video stream, or play the entire thing, with actual streaming. This will also satisfy the people deamnding genuine streaming videos (currently our videos are of so high quality, that they often cannot be "streamed" (really, watched while they are being downloaded)).
We agree that the current system is not perfect. If someone has a better solution, we're all ears!
|
01-16-07 09:14am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.47 seconds.
|
|
