Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
Webmaster : Claypaws (44)

View Feedback:   Replies (196)         Other:   Site Feedback (0)   |   Replies Received (125)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 196 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A Reply of TheSquirrel's Reply

"...followed by four minutes of sex. Too much like reality."

What? You mean there are people who can keep going for as long as four minutes? Surely not. ;-)


11-14-12  10:51am

Reply
2
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Usually fully dressed with plenty of tease. Sometimes it is appropriate to start in lingerie, for example when on a bed as this is somewhat more realistic than starting fully dressed on a bed.

11-14-12  10:48am

Reply
3
N/A Reply of Toadsith's Reply

Exactly as Toadsith. So far, I never had a problem with un-reviewed sites. Reviews are just one factor in deciding whether or not to join.

11-10-12  06:58am

Reply
4
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Toadsith's answer is closest to my view. I believe not only that marijuana should be legalised but also all the hard drugs - heroin, cocaine etc should be treated as Toadsith describes from the legal and taxation standpoints. The greatest damage to society is caused not by the physical and chemical effects of the pure drugs but by the crime and violence associated with their currently illegal market. Legalising worldwide would eliminate the need and potential for crime. Certainly some more people might die from the drugs, as they do from cigarette related illness, but fewer would be murdered or otherwise forced into addiction by pushers and I believe the balance would be hugely beneficial.

Unfortunately, as with porn, the public and the elected legislators always confuse morality with law and attempt to legislate against what they disapprove of morally. Turning morality into law merely creates criminals.

Now, in the western world, we find it strange that homosexuality was ever criminal. In 100 years, people will find it strange that hard drugs were ever illegal. It takes generations of time to separate morality from law.

I strongly morally disapprove of recreational drug use, whether soft or hard. But I strongly believe they should all be legal, worldwide.


11-08-12  09:55am

Reply
5
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I also use MS Word. I am highly anal about typos, punctuation and grammar. It is not possible to rely on Word alone. It will permit mistakes and object to things which are actually correct.

11-04-12  08:36am

Reply
6
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I only give feedback to sites I care about. I have probably done this with around ten sites and have had replies from all of them. Sometimes this led to extended correspondence and, on several sites, suggestions were implemented.

11-02-12  10:57am

Reply
7
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I have zero interest in all competitive sport, amateur or professional.

10-29-12  01:22pm

Reply
8
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

No. I have not yet passed my exam in paranoia.

10-15-12  08:22am

Reply
9
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Not affected me. Let me see:

cost of one month subscription is the same as:

One day's parking at my local railway station;
Or
Driving 100 miles;
Or
One concert ticket;
Or
One single course meal in a simple restaurant.

I suppose that if I were really pushed, I would just not do one of those things instead.


10-10-12  01:54am

Reply
10
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

"Now, what am I guilty of?"

Recklessness.


10-03-12  12:06pm

Reply
11
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I put over 30%. But my PC is really a temporary buffer store for my externals. PC's data drive is only 120GB and only about 20GB gets used for porn but I have about 6TB of external storage, including backups, spread over many drives.

10-03-12  11:58am

Reply
12
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I also put less than 50%. But that is in the context of not understanding the question :-)

By "stay over a year", I assumed was meant "contribute in any way at all to reviews, comments, forum or polls for over a year".

The question did not ask how many write reviews for over a year and I did not take it to mean that. If it did, then I would think less than 10%.

If it meant "not have their membership voluntarily or compulsorily deactivated", I would think the figure would be higher, say around 80%.

The most difficult part of any survey is asking the right question ;-) (Not wishing to be rude, Cybertoad, forgive me).

How about this for a question: "Do you?" You must answer yes or no.


09-30-12  12:38pm

Reply
13
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

LOL. I do not even own a TV.

09-21-12  12:24pm

Reply
14
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Other - as RustyJ.

I also include a cross reference to at least one set in the new name, referring me back to the old name so I can find all her stuff.


09-15-12  03:01am

Reply
15
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I put probably not. I'm with Cybertoad and Capn.

The discounts are so small compared to other things I spend money on that they make little difference. I feel the same about regional pricing. Put it this way; when I put a tank of diesel in my car, it costs £50, which is about $75. A few hours parking in a nearby city costs £10 about $15. A $5 discount or surcharge on a month membership makes no difference to me. Maybe a $15 discount gets me thinking but even that is irrational.

A discount has more influence on when I rejoin a site that I join frequently because it is multiplied by the number of months.


09-14-12  04:19pm

Reply
16
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

One theatre or concert ticket + fuel to drive to the nearest city + parking costs about £25 to £30, say about $40 to $45.

So yes, online porn is very good value.


09-07-12  03:54pm

Reply
17
N/A Reply of Drooler's Reply

Drooler. You have brilliantly expressed how I feel too.

09-05-12  05:01pm

Reply
18
N/A Reply of gaypornolover's Reply

LOL. I've never really understood the appeal of videos when photos are available. :-)

09-05-12  04:55pm

Reply
19
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I always unzip them (even though I have programs that can view inside zips).

I always view the photosets I download. Like lk2, I do have plenty of videos that I have not viewed.


09-05-12  02:58am

Reply
20
N/A Reply of Claypaws's Poll

This is getting very interesting now. I really appreciate all the detailed answers too. Keep 'em coming!

09-04-12  05:13pm

Reply
21
N/A Reply of Claypaws's Poll

Interesting replies so far. The reason I did not include "other" as an option is that it is something of a cop-out. I could also have offered "combination of the above" but didn't, for the same reason. I asked what *most* attracts you in order to force a single choice by radio button, but obviously elaborated in the written replies.

It is asking what *most* attracts you to *download*, not what most appeals after you have downloaded. And it assumes your "niche" is already satisfied - so if style of photography or filming or clothing is your thing, then you are on a site that has or includes that style - so what then most attracts you to download a particular model or photo set or video from that site? It could of course still be clothing or any one of the other choices. For example, you might be on a lingerie video site but only download videos involving a particular kind of lingerie and find that more important than body type.

For me, it is face. A plain girl with a glint of desire does not do it for me. I would not download. I have to like her face. If she is beautiful but staring into space, I might well download but I would then be disappointed. I do have preferred body types and likings in body parts and clothing but, if I do not like her face, none of those things will matter. And if I like her face, I can tolerate any of the other things missing the mark and I will download. And, if in video, no matter how good her performance, if I do not like her face then I am not interested. The face will attract me to download though I might afterwards find the performance does nothing for me.

Facial expression is part of the face as far as I am concerned. As nineinch says, "Faces that say f**k me" provided I also find them beautiful.

Perhaps this is why I say I have never yet found a site where I like more than 10% of the content. That is because I at least have to like the face. It is not just "pretty face" that I need after I have downloaded - then other factors are important too but it is the face, above all, that determines whether or not I download at all.

Keep 'em coming. I am interested to see what makes people download content.


09-03-12  11:59am

Reply
22
N/A Reply of marcdc1's Poll

I rarely watch (video) porn at all because I find it boring. I actually prefer foreign language because the dialogue in US porn is so unconvincing. It is better if I cannot easily understand what they say. If it is in a foreign language which I have some knowledge of, then it can be fun to try to follow the dialogue.

08-28-12  04:34am

Reply
23
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I will not join a site that does its own billing or uses an obscure agent. Though I am happy with all the Karups sites. They do their own billing but I have been joining them since before I knew about good and bad billers. Karups are 100% trustworthy.

Apart from them, it has to be CCBill, Epoch or Segpay. I will accept NetBilling if I have a strong reason to trust the site. I have no experience of Verotel, have never encountered a site that uses them and would therefore have avoided them if it were not for recommendations from fellow users.


08-26-12  12:09pm

Reply
24
N/A Reply of turboshaft's Reply

No. It is on all the members' content too. Those samples are actual members' content. WYSIWYG (unfortunately).

08-25-12  04:29am

Reply
25
N/A Reply of messmer's Poll

Small, bottom left or bottom right.

For an example of how NOT to do it, have a look at Betty 18. There are samples to view. All the Girls 18 sites put a watermark bang in the centre of the image and it is a huge circular thing whose diameter is half the length of the long side! I had a membership many years ago and that logo is on the members' images too. Plus they also have a huge red logo at bottom left.


08-24-12  11:08pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 196 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.38 seconds.