| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Skokoff
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- High quality photography (2592x3872 portrait, 3872x2592 landscape in high quality)
- User-friendly site design/layout. Everything works!
- A number of very attractive models, especially Vera (Annabella, Irishka and Natasha also very nice!). Site features 93 models in total. Site has models index page - (http://www.skokoff.com/models.html)
- Zip downloads: available in high, medium and low quality
- Download managers permitted
- (Tongue in cheek) The back button doesn't stop working as with some other sites (eg Metart)!
- Cams/liveshow section available (have not checked it out myself though) |
| Cons: |
- Somewhat limited content as site only dates back to June 2008 (52063 photos in total). If site stays in operation, and updates keep on coming, this situation should obviously improve in time.
- Site does feature video clips but only 29 in total
- A little bit more in terms of models biographical info would be nice - eg likes, what they do outside of modelling. A biographical page attached to the end of each zip download (as happens with more recent Met-Art sets) would be great. |
| Bottom Line: |
I like to have my fingers in several pies at once, both hardcore and softcore and recently joined Skokoff to fulfil my ongoing desire for the latter. This is a very good site, though it cannot compete with the likes of sites like Met-Art (where I'm also currently a member) when it comes to sheer numbers/quantity of sets. Rather something more akin to a 'boutique' site where I have personally ventured mainly in order to pick up specific sets - but have indulged in the other material going whilst I'm around.
Nice and easy to use site, zips available - unlike my next destination - Rigin-Studio - where zips have been done away with (nominally, according to the owner, in an attempt to combat piracy).
Skokoff had been on my radar for a while and I finally got round to becoming a member about two weeks ago. Happy that I did.
A softcore, mainly photo site you will not find any masturbation/toys here as is seen at sites like Nubiles or Teen Dreams. This is an erotic photography, and not pornographic, site :-) There are a number of sets with 2 girls posing together, kissing and sucking of boobies/simulated fanny-licking permitted! |
|
03-28-11 02:15pm
Replies (8)
|
Comment
2
|
AV Erotica
(0)
|
|
09-23-10 03:07am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
3
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
|
09-02-10 02:10am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
4
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
|
08-31-10 05:17pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
5
|
AV Erotica
(0)
|
|
08-25-10 11:35am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
6
|
AV Erotica
(0)
|
|
11-27-09 03:37pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
7
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
|
06-18-09 06:45pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
8
|
AV Erotica
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of "completely nude" sets
- High Resolution photo sets
- Zipped content
- Exclusive sets
- Good site navigation - uncluttered design
- Online favorites section (galleries & movies)
- Works well with site ripping software & download managers |
| Cons: |
- not much variety (lots of outdoor shoots)
- Nice blog section hasn't been updated for a couple of years
- nothing you can't get on (IMHO) superior sites such as FemJoy and MetArt |
| Bottom Line: |
Don't get me wrong - I like the site. I like my porn to feature insanely beautiful girls. You know - the kind of girls that on an unfair planet you would never get to see topless - let alone spreading their labia. Just occasionally this site delivers one of these creatures and this was what tempted me to AVErotica in the first place. But...it doesn't appear to be happening enough to keep my hard earned money going to Mr Volkov. THere are currently around 130 models on the site and a quick browse through the mug shots only meade we really want to investigate around 10 in any more detail.
The site is well laid out if a little simple and feature light. The set rating feature seems underused (even the "Top Rated" models seem to have only around 80 votes each) so isn't very reliable. Not a big deal to me as I tend to download everything and keep everything but...
Video content is of a high quality but updates are only once a week and most have one of those awful Kenny G style soprano sax soundtraks.
If you're a fan of very naked, usually quite pretty Russian girls in fairly explicit poses then this site is probably for you - especially if you can't afford the membership to MetArt. Nut But I'd be suprised if you kept the membership going for more than a few months. Personally - I'll probably join for a month every other year or so and use download mangers to rip the last year's content as both download speed, no DLManager limitations and full archives will make it a good deal. |
|
04-19-09 03:48pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
9
|
Ero Nata
(0)
|
|
02-15-09 04:39am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
10
|
Ero Nata
(0)
|
|
02-01-09 10:08am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
11
|
Sinful Goddesses
(0)
|
|
01-21-09 04:34am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
12
|
Sinful Goddesses
(0)
|
|
12-31-08 02:23am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
13
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
|
12-02-08 09:02am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
14
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
|
11-24-08 09:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
15
|
Skokoff
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Lots of attractive girls who probably sign their contracts in the Cyrillic alphabet.
+All-exclusive content.
+None of those blasted toys!
+Galleries updated every other day June-October 2008; daily in November.
+Pics in 3 sizes: small 1000px; medium 2500px, and large 3008 or 3872 or 4368px.
+All sizes of pics available à la carte or in zips.
+Nice, clean site design that is set up to be easy to use. (But see the cons ...)
+Extensive visitor’s area. You can see everything the site offers except for the gallery thumbs and full vids. And there are photo samples in all sizes.
+All videos in WMV (424x240), QT, and HD DivX (1280x720), which is the best, of course, with no choppiness. |
| Cons: |
-Unruly thumbs: Have been greeted in some galleries, even new ones, with nothing but empty image-tag X’s, not thumb pics. “X” occasionally marks the spot in some other galleries, too.
-There’s also the “swollen thumb” -- a tiny fraction of the top left of a pic where the thumb should be.
-Some clicks for enlargements expand to a full-screen “404” error page.
-Wandering watermarks: At least one gallery had the watermark not in the bottom right where it belongs, but in some pics hovering like a drone close to the model, etc.
-Oops! I’m a visitor! Some links in the members’ area expose you to the public space. (Click “members” for re-entry with no additional login.)
-Slow downloads. 30 min. for a 324MB vid. Started at 175Kbps; eased down to 139. And a 140MB vid clocked at only 105. A photoset crawled its way to me at 70.
-Only 14 videos. Sorry, but this is a photography site, even in motion. Flash-flash! The mood music helps a bit. |
| Bottom Line: |
You might have heard of Skokov. That’s how it’s spelled at MetArt. Well, my friends, I did check the artist page there for material here that might qualify as “non-exclusive.” Fortunately, I found none.
The girls here are mostly very lovely. Some of the better-knowns are Lena, July (Sandra at MetArt, Judy at FemJoy), Katerina (Rina at MetModels, Cat at FemJoy), Vika (also at FemJoy), and Natasha, the ubiquitous Helena-Larissa-Nastya-Nata-Natalie. 53 models in all so far, that ain’t bad!
The photography is tasteful and professional. The settings suggest a certain opulence, yet it is not overdone. I just wish there was more brightness in more of the sets. And I do hope for more sets of July and Lena. There’s only 1 of each so far.
As I got into the site, I was thinking, “This is very smart. The clean design, the simple and easy navigation by models or by galleries ...” But then I started seeing the flaws, as noted in the cons. Somebody needs to get their act together and make sure that the thumbs work, and that they’re there to begin with.
And what’s with the watermark right above Katerina’s head in “Beautiful Red” 047.jpg? And in 080? To the left of her face in 035? And why is 053 missing both the thumb and the pics?
Well, in spite of its flaws, I’d still recommend this site to now-forewarned photo lovers. The pros outweigh the cons, even though the cons are annoying. And I’d say now is the time to fix that stuff, before the site gets any bigger. |
|
11-22-08 08:46pm
Replies (15)
|
Comment
16
|
Ero Nata
(0)
|
|
09-28-08 11:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
17
|
AV Erotica
(0)
|
|
09-14-08 10:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
18
|
Ero Nata
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Absolut cute girl
Easy navigation
three different picture resulution ( up to 2.912 x 4.368 pixels)
Pictures are not too much compressed (big sizes are ~1.5mb)
I'm not a big video fan, but the videos seems also good |
| Cons: |
It's mostly a NonNude page
Each set looks like the other (first with clothes, than show the breast) |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm sure, everybody will know this cutie (Helena from glamedeluxe and helensplanet, Natasha from Met-Art, and so on..).
For me it's unbelivable how a such boring site could exist with such a hottie
A real shame for the webmasters/producer of this site.
I recommend to stay away from this site.
If you like the girl, join another site where she is posing regular. The other sites knows how to make amazing photos. |
|
08-15-08 11:03am
Replies (0)
|
Review
19
|
Ero Nata
(0)
62.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Easy navigation
+Solo model Nata (known also as Natasha, Natalia, Helena, Larissa, etc.). is very cute and sexy!
+All exclusive content; nice quality pics
+Pics in 1000px, 2500px, and 4300px
+Zips in all pic sizes
+All videos in 3 formats: wmv (424x240), quicktime (424x240), or avi (but see those cons!) |
| Cons: |
-WARNING: Most of the photos on this site contain full or partial NON-nudity, which may be offensive to some subscribers.
-The “About Me” part of the web site makes a big deal about how Nata likes to pose nude. What, I feel I must ask, is the relevance of that to the photo content of this site???? It’s teaser stuff! (I guess all that “About Me” nudity stuff is supposed to be part of the tease, too, eh? Great. My balls just changed to a different shade of blue.)
-Only 36 photosets to date
-Updates every 3 days, so you’d be getting about 10 changes of clothes per month
-Only 7 videos to date; downloads only at about 380-400kbps (20mb connection).
-WMV and Quicktime videos look BAD.
-Trouble with avi. My version of DivX player (the latest) tells me the vids don’t support “seeking” and wouldn’t play. |
| Bottom Line: |
Nata’s been at a number of other sites (ATK Premium, FemJoy, GlamDeluxe, JustTeenSite, MetArt, Nubiles, PeterJanhans, Pretty4Ever, TeenDreams, and her own Helen's Planet) ... NUDE. Yes, nekked as a jaybird. And lookin’ good!
And here’s an excerpt from the “About Me” section of Ero Nata (corrected for word spacing): “As I've said before, I love to be nude. But to me, posing in the nude allows me to express myself in a way that many girls rarely get the chance to do: Express themselves in a sensual, sexy, feminine, beautiful way, in all their natural glory. And besides, the photos and videos will last longer than a simple memory. Also, it is very thrilling to know that people all over the world will see and enjoy all my natural feminine charms.”
Come again?
There is very damn little nudity here in the photosets. Exception: One darkly lit set in a shower. For $24.95.
The videos have nudity (except for “Swing,” which is upskirt naked pussy and a bit of titty), but they look terrible fullscreen in wmv and QT (small dimensions), and they aren’t working in DivX! And there are only 7 vids anyway.
For the money, there are much more content-loaded tease sites out there with a variety of models (OnlyTease, for one). But if you’re nuts only about Nata NOT au naturelle, then here ya go. The photos, anyway, since the videos are dicey.
Which hurts the score. Plus the lack of content overall AND of course the misleading statements about nudity. |
|
07-26-08 03:30pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
20
|
AV Erotica
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+NO TOYS! (Yes, it can be done!)
+All exclusive
+Photos in 667x1000, 1667x2500, and 29xx X 43xx.
+Zips in medium size only, but they’re heavy, and the galleries have lots of pics. (Example: 5 zips I had of one model equaled about 650MB.)
+High quality, data-rich images. A medium-sized with a plain green background was 656K; a large was 1.72MB.
+Videos, smallest to largest file size, in wmv, Quicktime, and DivX
+Galleries from 07/07, daily from 11/07
+Server speed
+Easy, sensible navigation
+Can rate and/or comment on models, galleries, and videos
+Visitor’s preview shows a lot about the site
+Do check out the blog area. The writing is clear and focused and the stories told there might interest you. The English is almost perfect. They must have a great Russian-English translator. (Assuming that Volkov is Russian. Ukrainian? Other? I don't know.) |
| Cons: |
-For video fans: Not that many are up so far. 26 to date. Videos started in 9/07 and there’s a new one each Tuesday.
-For 1280x720 stalwarts, just 16 of the vids are that size.
-Videos can be boring
-Too many photos of the model looking away from the camera
-Galleries usually have no clear organization; I recommend a "narrative" approach of stripping to total nudity with implied sex
-Blurriness in some photos was a bummer, especially of what would have been splendid ass shots of Goldie (oh my!). Overly dark pics less of a problem, but sometimes were.
-Would you like all of the models? I didn’t, but I liked enough. |
| Bottom Line: |
Anton Volkov (hence the “AV” in the site name) is an established nude photographer with quite a corpus of work at MetArt, where he presently ranks #10 among their 60 listed artists. Several of his models there are also here, including Alice A/Malina, Irina, Julia, Katya, Leticia, Nusia, Olivia, Riana, Tati, and the especially awe-inspiring Lena, Goldie/Zlata A, and Nata (aka Helen, Larissa, etc.).
There are no duplications of MetArt material here. And yes, this is a purely softcore site, and I hope it stays that way.
Vids: With softcore vids, it’s especially challenging to keep the viewer enthralled. I recommend this basic idea: “I am undressing for you ... I want you so bad ...” The model has to get aroused, look often right into the camera, and feel passion for someone who’s not physically there. The POV is the viewer, having a very memorable day.
Dasha’s vid of turning around on a bed, looking very bored and clueless as to what to do was a total bomb. Olivia’s “In Corset” was better, as she had some magnetism, but it still didn’t hold me. And that’s all the predictable boredom that I cared to undergo to write this review.
$24.95 for access to several months of exclusive, quality content was a good deal, in spite of the flaws, without which the site would have rated higher.
What it needs most is a more consistent visceral "connection" between the models and the viewer, in the pics and the vids. |
|
02-10-08 04:03am
Replies (6)
|
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.31 seconds.
|
|
