Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Webmaster Profile A detailed history of activity from this webmaster in all different categories.
Webmaster : Karup (15)

View Feedback:   Replies (37)         Other:   Site Feedback (393)   |   Replies Received (28)

Incoming Feedback All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites.
Shown : 26-50 of 102 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
26
Visit Karup's PC

Karup's PC
(1)

86.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Really a lot of photographs and movies.

A recent movie and the photograph are big sizes.

Various content that equals network site.

Lovely women in various countries.

The woman who has the chest of the imitation is few.
Cons: Photographs of the same title.

Some errors.
Bottom Line: It is a site with very various content.
There are a movie and a photograph that two or more photographers made from each individuality. It is possible to enjoy it like the network site. I chiefly enjoyed the movie and the photograph of B/G.
Contents of a lot of movies and a lot of photographs are various like the thing etc. of the thing of the Club Seventeen style, the thing of the Only Cuties style, and the Nubiles style. It is very happy.

I think everyone for me to be able to find the liked thing from among movies all.

This is a subjective opinion. There are two men with a bad feeling to perform to Karup 's Hometown Amateurs a lot, too. There is no dissatisfaction because their movies are fewer than Karup 's Hometown Amateurs though they are on this site, too.

There is a dissatisfied point about the photograph.
There are a lot of photographs of the same title. When they are downloaded at the same time, it is stored in the file as which two or more women's photographs are the same. Inconvenience. Unkindness.
Reality Kings has very a lot of photographs. They are putting a different title on all photographs. Convenience. Kindness.

The size in some larger photographs cannot be downloaded. They that is smaller can be downloaded. Maintenance shortage.

I like this site very much as the overall opinion. I think that I like this site if you like ATK Galleria.

I will regularly become a member on this site in the future.

07-04-10  08:25am

Replies (0)
Comment
27
Visit Karup's PC

Karup's PC
(1)

Karups

I joined the orginal main site over a year ago. Although there are many positives I can bring up about them, there is one that stands out most... and that is the extraordinary help and customer service this great site provided. They went so far as to show a personal interest in my stand as a member. The owner and his brother even got involved. Never, in all the sites I've been a member have I received this kind of attention. My experience as a customer's evaulation of their content can only be summed up a par-excellence. I highly recommend this site and am proud to have been a part of it.

06-23-10  08:28am

Replies (2)
Comment
28
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)

Anybody else having problems downloading?

Just subscribed today and while it works great for viewing and downloading photos, I can't download any videos. I can stream the new HD ones that have flash videos available and I can download the HD but any video from less then this year I can't download.

I also can't use my download manager, is that normal for this site? Everytime I try it, it saves it as a html page that when I bring up takes me to the members login area. So not really sure what's going on. Anybody have any ideas?

Jeffrey

UPDATE: Not really sure what happened but I guess Firefox got corrupted or something. Tried downloading the photos and videos on another PC also using Firefox and they worked fine. So decided to come back to this one and update Firefox. Everything has worked fine since then.

As for download managers, once I allowed "third party cookies" in Firefox, DownThemAll worked perfectly for queing up and downloading/resuming the zips/videos. So my thoughts on the side have went up a ton since signing up.

03-21-10  06:40am

Replies (3)
Review
29
Visit BF Collection

BF Collection
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Sexy boys and some memorable material in the archives.
Cons: New content is not up to scratch.
Bottom Line: I have regularly been a member of this site for over ten years. When I was the age of these boys I even found it possible to have crushes on them. Many of the boys in the archive are the beautiful down to earth kind you see in the pub and think about for days, and they really want to show you their goods. These videos were also shot with care and attention and respect for the beauty of the models, and capturing some of the juiciest orgasms I have ever seen. There was a time when there was nothing else on the internet I would have preferred to look at. Unfortunately the golden era of this site is over. The boys just aren't worth looking at anymore, I could get boys like this every night if I wanted to, and the photographers know that the boys are boring. I usually feel like I'm not getting a decent look at the cock, and to be honest what I'm really paying for is to get a good look at hot cock. And the reviewer here is correct that the quality of the videos has slipped behind the general standard of internet porn. They have also started playing really revolting music over their videos and it seems like they are thinking of getting rid of the broken-up video format where you could just download his cum or more if you really liked him. I think they are either trading off what they had, or they are simply losing it. If you've seen the archive, spend your money elsewhere.

03-12-10  02:57am

Replies (0)
Review
30
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)

75.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Nice size collection, lots of models

HD looks good, most vids are good quality

Frequent updates
Cons: Models lack variety. I didn't know there was that many blondes in the world. There is a noticeable lack of ethnic diversity.

Older video lack same quality as more recent ones.

Navigation is suspect, very few options
Bottom Line: Lots of content, but most of the vids really lack direction. The girls seem uninterested and kind of just go through the motions. Hardcore scenes are very vanilla. Same positions, no attempt at chemistry, and camera work could be better. There are many better sites in the genre. I'd recommend any ATK sites, or Brand New Faces first, and a few others that may lack the quantity, but make up for it with originality and quality of models, if not video.

02-05-10  03:12am

Replies (4)
Review
31
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)

81.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Photograph and video that took a lot of amateur girls.

There are lovely girls of various races there.

There are slim girls, a little plump girls, and various girls.

It is easy to use the retrieval function.
Cons: Some actors are not passionate.

There are girls with the breast of the imitation though it is a little.
Bottom Line: I read the review to which BabyGetReal whom I held in high esteem had written this site.
And, I contracted the member of three months of this site at once.
I thought that I had done a good selection.
In this site, there are a lot of healthy, lovely girls.
I love sites where girls in Russia and Europe exist. However, many of girls there are too thin.
There are a lot of amateur girls with healthy body of this site, and it is very good.

Sativa is very wonderful though BabyGetReal also is writing in the review.
It is the highest one in all movies that I downloaded.

The photograph of Elle, Autumn, Cameron, and Jacey, etc. is very good. However, the small size because of the movie it a little before is regrettable.

I like past works a little better than latest movie on this site. Two actors who frequently perform to a recent movie do not like it. It is a hair thin, fat man, and it is a thin middle-aged man. I think that appointing a passionate, a little more young actor is good the person. I think that it is good also for girls.

Please forgive writing my subjectivity a little.

The movie on this site has B/G, G/G, and the masturbation.
I can enjoy the B/G movie, and am satisfied.
If, if it likes masturbation movie, you will be able to enjoy this site more.
The G/G movie is not especially recommended.

This is sentences written with a translation software. Please forgive the place not understood easily.

12-15-09  09:35am

Replies (0)
Review
32
Visit Freshman X

Freshman X
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Attractive and masculine models; Clean site layout; site functions properly; decent mix of models and locations; easy to download content; no DRM
Cons: This is a fairly new site (since appx. 12/08) so there isn't a huge amount of content yet but it's adequate and updates are frequent.
Bottom Line: A nice variety of college-age guys here; a few bad boys, skater types and a twink here and there. Some videos are available in HD but the overall quality of the others is quite good. The site is easy to navigate and there don't appear to be download restrictions. For a young site this is a pretty good value at the current membership price. If you're into amateur, next-door types then check it out.

11-15-09  04:32pm

Replies (0)
Comment
33
Visit Karup's Older Women

Karup's Older Women
(0)

Imminent TBP Review?

I see you have this site listed for a high priority review.

2 questions:

What sort of timescale are you looking at?

Is it likely you will be able to negotiate a discounted rate for PU members?

Thanks,

Cap'n. :0)

09-27-09  12:45pm

Replies (2)
Comment
34
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)

I liked it.

It has some really cute models.
Mainly photosets.
Good strip sequences.
Update rate could be higher.
Videos I won't comment on as I don't use them.

It was the price which made me cancel.

09-06-09  09:19am

Replies (0)
Review
35
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)

82.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - All the girls are young and beautiful.
- No breast implants!
- No anal!
- The guys are usually gentle and considerate with the girls, unlike e.g. YoungModels where they are fast, hard, and rough.
- Video .wmv files are named systematically, with the actress' name, unlike some sites where the filename is a meaningless number.
- Nearly all videos are well lit. But see cons!
- All the guys manage to stay hard (or the limp parts are edited out). Here, you'll never have to watch long scenes of an actress sucking on a limp dick to no avail.
Cons: - Bad support? I emailed pointing one failure of their search engine and suggesting remastering some great early vids at higher resolution, and never received a reply.
- No descriptions, no ratings, no "most viewed" -- you're on your own with >500 videos.
- Same few stunt cocks in nearly all videos. They seem mechanical and bored. Often they skip any oral on the girl, and they are rarely heard to complement the girl on her looks or sexiness or to be romantic or intimate. Their demeanor does not bring out the most erotic side of the girls. It takes a girl who is incredibly horny or really loves sex or has a special personality to shine under these circumstances -- most don't.
- Uninspired directing. Most scenes follow the same boring mechanical sequence in a bedroom.
- Most scenes end in a ridiculous facial, usually after the guy jacks himself for quite some time. How NOT sexy is it to hear Jimmy say "open your mouth, NOW!"? Give me a break!
OUT OF ROOM HERE. REST IN A "REPLY".
Bottom Line: Very recent files are HD, recent files are medium resolution (640 x 480), and older files are low resolution (360 x 240). However, at full screen I couldn't see much difference between the medium and low resolution -- so I suspect the medium is empty magnification of the low. WMV is the only available format. No problem -- with free Flip4Mac I played them all in Quicktime on OS X. All videos are divided into four scenes of about 7 minutes each. The inability to download a whole video as one file is annoying.

There are tons of still photos. The resolution is OK but not great (700 x 1000 to 1000 x 1500 pixels; file sizes 200 - 600 kilobytes).

The vast majority of the scenes are without condoms. To me, this is very unfortunate, since Jimmy, the guy in 80% of the scenes, has now fucked hundreds of young women without a condom. I gather that market forces demand this (or porn companies think they do?), but how many young people have to get HIV before this stops? On the pro side, in the occasional scenes where a condom is used, they don't try to hide it, occasionally even showing it being rolled on by the girl -- definitely a pro in my book.

Well, I took one for the team and sifted through all 300-some boy/girl videos looking for the occasional gem. Here are my favorites. You can search by the first name of the actress to find these. These are the full filenames, except for the a/b/c/d that divide each video into 4 scenes.

There are some very early, lo-res scenes with what might be real couples (real amateurs?!) that are the hottest on the site, to my taste (see my profile). Of course I prefer crisp videos where you can see the body down, but real intimacy, arousal, and chemistry trump resolution any day in my book. (It would be great if KarupsHA would see fit to re-release these early hot vids in higher resolution!) Examples:

sativa-bg-1: She is incredibly naturally sexy. He and she interact naturally, with affection and intimacy. The KarupsHA camerapeople and stunt cocks could learn from this one. No jerky camera work. No rushing from position to position - sex is fun, not a race. No closeups that hide the beautiful people.

kat170-bg-1 is another great early low-res video. Nice foreplay, real passion, lots of kissing, real intimacy and caring. I thought this one could hold up to comparison with the better boy-girl videos at LittleMutt (except for its poor resolution).

evita-bg012 and evita-bg039 are very hot! Needs remastering at higher res.

Turning to more recent scenes that are medium resolution with the stunt cocks:

Valerie is one of the most amazing and erotic pro-am women I've seen (both here and on Nubiles, same name) because she is really horny, completely natural, and cums intensely over and over. She says she needs sex 14 times/week, but is getting it only 3-4 times/week from her boyfriend (valerie-bg-6). In valerie225-bg-2, ... OUT OF ROOM HERE, WILL TRY TO PUT REMAINDER IN A "REPLY".

08-23-09  06:27pm

Replies (2)
Review
36
Visit Karup's PC

Karup's PC
(1)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: + A lot of girls, most with multiple picture sets and many with video. Many girsl I've not seean elsewhere as well as the usual suspects.
+ Almost all exclusive content
+ An increasing number of HD quality vids
+ Nice easy site navigation and good server speed
+ Comprehensive model index
+ HUGE 10 year archive
+ Nice search engine
+ no problems with download managers and no download limits
+ simple zip downloads for photo sets (choice of two resolutions)
+ single or mulitple video downloads for each update
+ Did I mention there are a lot of girls in here?
Cons: - Some video posted is still low res
- Doesn't update every day
- Nothing very "different" about either vid or photo sets
Bottom Line: The main strentgh of Karups is the size of it's back catalogue. I'm not convinced there are girls in Eastern Europe who aren't featured somewhere in the archive. Certainly, if a girl has taken all her clothes off in the Czech Republic she'll be somewhere in the Karups model index!

Personaly I find the video the most compelling download here but the photo sets are also excellent if not quite up to the hires standard of some other sites. All sets are availble in standard or hires zips.

Video res can be a bit hit and miss. Most of the archive is pretty low (640x480) but this is to be expected really when the archive goes back so far. Most recent video is stated as HD - although even this can vary from 960x540 to 1280x720. The vid content though is good - most of the videos take a standard strip -> masterbation format and the girls get naked pretty quick and are never shy about showing the lot! Hardcore videos are also common and are usually pretty standard: clothed, she sucks him, she gets naked, he licks her out, he fucks her, he comes on her face/tits, end. You know where you are and there are few suprises. The BIG plus is lots of the girls are exclusive - never seen a lot of them elsewhere and that's no mean feat comming from someone with over 10Tb of porn.

Karups doesn't upload every day but there are always areound 4 or 5 updates a week with 6 pic sets and 2 or 3 videos and amongst these there's nearly always a winner!

Overall I'd recommend Karups if you're not after imaginitive photoshots and video. If you like pretty girls you've not come across (haha) elsewhere to simply take of their clothes and show you their "all" then you won't go too far wrong here. Nothing earth shattering but good quality reliable updates backup up by a simple and fast site.

08-14-09  04:19pm

Replies (0)
Comment
37
Visit Karup's Older Women

Karup's Older Women
(0)

Reduced Quality Samples!

I keep going back to this site time and time again, tempted to finally take the plunge and subscribe and there's always something to stop me from doing so. This time the fly in the ointment is found in their limited tour.

How the heck can you judge the quality of their videos if they offer you a "reduced quality sample" only? The end effect is that those who are interested in videos will say, "I'm going to stay clear of this site because I'm not quite sure what I'll get!"

06-24-09  01:03pm

Replies (11)
Review
38
Visit Karup's Older Women

Karup's Older Women
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - no restrictions or DRM
- zip photoset downloads
- decent sized library of content
- exclusive content
- New HD videos look good
- 6 updates a week
- search function
Cons: - Average video quality on most videos
- Some of the models are barely "older women"
- Older videos split into clips
- Images could be larger
Bottom Line: This is Karup's try at the mature or "MILF" thing and I'd say the did a pretty good job. The women are between the ages of, I'd say, 30 and 60. Most of the women look like they are in their 30's, though there are more than enough fine mature women. So you will see some actual crows feet, stretch marks and surgery scars (these are not necessarily bad things). The women are good looking, you will not find too many old hags. The content is similar to what you'd see at All Over 30, even a lot of the same women. There's a mixture of well known porn stars and the women you only see at mature sites.

Photo content is grouped according to type. Those types are toys, action, uniforms and mature.
Here's the breakdown at the time of my review:
224 action (this is harcore sex, usually one-on-one)
204 toy (masturbation with toys)
147 uniform (themed outfits, usually office clothes or workout gear)
767 mature (Just regular solo shoot of the models)

And here are the videos:
148 hardcore (sex)
527 solo (interview and then masturbation, toys optional)

You can also find content by model name and there is a search function. There are not that many options for search criteria, but it can be useful with such a large library.

The majority of the videos are 640x480 2621k, which is just okay. However, they have now started to produce HD videos, which are 1280x720 4840kbps, and they look nice but there are only 3 or 4 right now. Some of oldest videos are only available split into 2-4 clips. Videos come in 1 quality of wmv and the newer vids also in streaming flash. I found the camera work to be a less than perfect at times for the videos.

The images in the photosets are 680 x 1240, but I expected better. The photography is very good though. There are zip downloads and slideshows.

As far as bonus content there are a few feeds which are not worth your time and then there are some sets from All Over 30 and Karups PC.

Overall I found it to be a pretty good site focusing on older women. Six updates a week is a pretty good rate, so the site will continue to improve especially now that they have HD videos. $29.85 is a little bit high, but it won't kill you. I downloaded a good amount of videos that I liked and will keep, so it was worth it for me. If you like All Over 30 you'll probably like Karups Older Women. So, I would recommend this site. You could probably get all you need in one month.

06-23-09  06:23am

Replies (6)
Comment
39
Visit Karup's PC

Karup's PC
(1)

Some minor updates.

Just joined again to Karups PC and HA and noticed that they now have full video download options and they are higher quality videos than what they used to have. This is much better than the 2-4 part splits of movies they had in the past.

HOWEVER, they still only have around 2-4 screen caps per video which is extremely lacking. I said it in my review and I will say it again, it's very hard to get a general idea of whether a scene will contain what you want to see from 2-4 screen caps. Please increase this Karups.

06-17-09  10:55pm

Replies (3)
Comment
40
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)

Any current/ past members had a problem with Karupsha's payment processor?

I've been checking out this site. The only thing is the payment processer EENT? Never heard of that one before. I usually go through ccbill. Any current members had a problem cancelling or logon through this processer?

The payment processor is a big deal if I don't recognise it. This issue alone can turn away members.

05-14-09  09:40am

Replies (3)
Review
41
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)

83.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - OVERWHELMING amount of content
- Easy navigation, detailed advanced search
- Incredible download speed (at 1.2Mbytes/sec, it probably maxed out my internet connection)
- LOTs of girls (sorry I didn't count them :-), several hundreds at least but could be close to a 1000 (?) )
- I found a big percentage of girls to be very attractive - young, beautiful and no fake tits
- Seems to be 100% exclusive
- Regular updates
- Rating system - cool!
- In general very nice photo quality
Cons: - Not too much HC stuff (OK, you still get a lot, but not comparable to the amount of softcore content)
- LOT more photosets than videos
- Lots of videos without the option to download the whole movie in one
- Overall not very satisfying video quality
- No way to change your password (?)
Bottom Line: Alright, so I was just about to subscribe to Karup's PC, when I saw an offer to subscribe to Karup's HA as well. Knowing their reputation (thanks to PU.com ;-) ), and that I really like amateurs, I immediately switched to Karup's HA instead. The price - $30 a month - might be a little bit pricey for some, but nowadays it seems to be a standard, so I won't mention it in a negative light. Especially, that you get a s****t load of content for your money! Download speed is amazing, day or night, it always maxed out my internet connection's capabilities.

I like the design and the structure, easy and fast. You have a model directory where you can see all the available sets and movies with the model; but please, names like "Charlie 2" aren't very 'human'. :-) You get an 'advanced search' function, where you can search by many different things, such as name, photo or video or both, action type, breast size, clothing, fetish, etc. Although it gave me results for 'anal movie' that didn't have any anal in them, but other than this it seemed to work effectively. I found the rating system to be very useful, and also the sections called 'top models' and 'top rated sets'.

As for the content, other than the fact that it's a lot :-), photo quality was up to my satisfaction, in one set you usually get around 110 - 160 pictures, but it might vary. Highest resolution is 1000x1500, which is okay but could be bigger. They're separated in 6 different categories, and lots of the updates are images. Meaning, if you're a 'picture person', you'll love it here. On the other hand video quality is rather poor. There's only one wmv format you can download them in, highest resolution I saw was 640x480, but that's not even my main problem: the picture just isn't sharp, sometimes the lighting seems 'messed up' (too light, too dark), I saw some 'angles' in videos that made me wanna flip my monitor 90 degrees to get it right, audio quality varies, sometimes it's good but sometimes it's just horrible, there were some videos where I saw filming equipment in the background, etc. I personally don't mind the 'chat' at the beginnings. Video length varies from ~9mins to ~25, depending on its kind. Most of them are softcores though. And this is the case with photos and videos too: this site emphasizes softcore material. Also, the main focus is on photos, not really on the movies.

Conclusion: I'd like to see way more hardcore sex, and way more videos in a way better quality. I like (softcore) pictures too for their beauty, but I'm mainly a 'movie lover'. I'd LOVE to see a website like this with the above mentioned focuses. Still, you get lots of nice girls, nice photosets and softcore actions that you can access real fast. Overall it's a great site - but not for the ones like me.

03-17-09  07:11pm

Replies (0)
Review
42
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)

79.0
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: + Huge amount of content
+ Some realistic sex/masturbation scenes in some of the movies.
+ Site broken up into categories to make for easy browsing
+ Frequent updates (5 per week)
Cons: - Some lower quality vids when you start getting to the older content
- Some movies only available as segments -- no full version available
- Seems to be a lot of so-so girls you need to browse through to pick out the gems
- Too much soft core (for me)
- Site design a little clunky
Bottom Line: Karup's Hometown Amateurs is a lot like the Batman movies to me. They never live up to all the hype!

Don't get me wrong, Hometown Amateurs is a good site. There is an insane amount of content so there is something for everybody. The video quality is decent and there are some attractive women and good sex scenes on the site.

On the flip side KHA could use a little work on the navigation so the users can find the movies/girls that are to their liking easier. The video options are also leave more to be desired.

This is a personal preference but I do prefer more hardcore sex on a site. If you're a softcore/amateur guy that won't be a problem!

03-14-09  08:38pm

Replies (0)
Comment
43
Visit Karup's Older Women

Karup's Older Women
(0)

Where Are The Older Women?

I was once again tempted to join this site and took their tour a minute ago but did not find any "older" woman until page 8 of their model list (Colleen). I have mentioned this before in another spot but I really believe that the name of this site should be changed to Karup's "Mature Women" because most of the models seem to range from their mid 20s to their mid-thirties. Nothing "older" about that. Either the webmaster is very young or his subscribers are barely out of their teens. Older indeed!!!

03-10-09  01:58pm

Replies (0)
Review
44
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)

96.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: lots of variety with great amateur models.
Some of the models are truly stunning.
Lots of high quality pics
no DRM or DL limits
DL speed is decent
Cons: Most vids are of low quality although the "girl next door" models are worth the low resolution
I truly can't hate on this site whatsoever.
Bottom Line: Great site for those that can do without any kinky story line or overviewed pornstars

02-27-09  09:56pm

Replies (3)
Review
45
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)

87.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: STKPC=similar to KarupsPC
UKPC=unlike KarupsPC

+STKPC, lots of models
+STKPC, pornstar directory with headshots
+STKPC, excellent download speeds
+STKPC, tons of image sets, all linked on the girl's page with ZIP downloads available
+STKPC, 100% exclusive content
+STKPC, site search with advanced controls
+STKPC, newer hardcore updates have both split and full scene downloads (last 1.5 years), however only recently (like, YESTERDAY) did they start in the softcore section.
+UKPC, KarupsHA features more american models, which is better if you enjoy listening to girls talk in videos, or if you like finding girls you have seen on sites like VideoBox.
Cons: +STKPC, girls have no last names, rather have numbers "Sarah 1", "Sarah 2", etc.
+STKPC, very old sets do not offer full scene downloads, only split scene
+STPKC, there are watermarks on all content, and all videos have 10 second intro material which shows the legal stuff and an "KarupsHA" logo.
+STKPC, no real bonus material
+STKPC, poor update schedule. 455 (video) updates in last 365 days, equates to ~1.3 updates per day, worse than KPC.
+STKPC, softcore content makes up brunt of updates. Last 386 (video) updates of last 455 were softcore (which is ~84.8%).
+STKPC, videos only available in WMV.
Bottom Line: Overall, there is nothing really different between KarupsHA than KarupsPC in terms of technical aspects. Back in the day, yes, there was a distinct difference. KarupsPC was created in 1997 (according to Whois info), while KarupsHA was created in 2001 (again, according to Whois info), so they put more focus on KarupsPC, as it was the household name in the Karups network, at least until KarupsHA gained steam. More updates were given to KarupsPC, better quality, better layout, better organization, etc. But now that they have devoted more effort to KarupsHA you really can not tell the difference between the sites:
-They look the same - you login to both members area and the only major difference is the girls who are plastered around the page (I would love to know who the girls are).
-The videos are the same, same nomenclature, same watermark location, same intro crap, etc.
-The girl naming scheme is the same ("Sarah 1", "Sarah 2", etc.)
-The quality is the same
-The organization is the same (softcore vs hardcore, videos split by type, e.g. toys, ethnic, athletic, etc.)
-The pornstar directory is the same
-etc. etc. etc.

So what is the difference? The difference is the focus. KarupsPC has focus on girls who are from Eastern Europe / Western Russia with a few American girls sprinkled in (they girls are there, just not named with proper names) while KarupsHA focuses more on girls from North America with a few European/Russian girls sprinkled in (again, they are there, just hard to find). So its all about your particular taste: European girls who speak broken English and look you in the eye like they really want you, and are ready for action, or American girls who speak perfect English and look at this as another job. My choice is KarupsHA because there are more girls on the site that I am looking for (I can name at least 5 off the top of my head right now) where as KarupsPC, not so much.

Again, in short, KarupsPC = KarupsHA, except PC focuses more on European/Russian girls while HA focuses more on American girls.
Only reason I gave KarupsHA an 87 while KarupsPC an 85 while being the same site is because I prefer American girls over European/Russian girls.

On another note, I would really prefer if these sites were part of a network where you buy one and get access to the other :P. The fact that they are essentially the same sites with different girls would make such a decision a no-briner.

02-17-09  08:18pm

Replies (2)
Review
46
Visit Karup's Older Women

Karup's Older Women
(0)

72.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: provides now higher resolution images (1000x1500)
daily updates
large amount of content
Cons: Disagree with TheRisso on exclusivity. While the picture quality is not as good as in olderwomen, auntjudys or allover30, one can find most of the models here in those other sites.

Customer can be locked-out after just a couple of mistyped passwords. Getting the account re-activated requires contacting the webmaster and waiting for at least 24 hours.

Most picture sets offer a repetitive theme with pretty much the same setting.
Bottom Line: A site which offers pretty good amount of content, both softcore and hardcore. The image quality of the sets is not as good as sites as allover30 or olderwomen but the movies are probably the best thing at this site.

01-26-09  12:03am

Replies (2)
Rating
47
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)

50.0
No Review.
01-25-09  04:57pm

Comment
48
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)

Question on softcore movies

I'm mostly interested in girls using toys. It's a bit hard to tell from the preview if all the softcore movies are like that. Or are most of these movies just girls undressing and showing of their body? If so, what's the ratio?
Is there some sort of search feature or preview of the movies so you don't have to download them all to check what they contain?

01-19-09  02:48am

Replies (1)
Comment
49
Visit Karup's Hometown Amateurs

Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)

Kayla

Mmm, there is this very cute girl named Kayla on the site, with a pseudo-tattoo over her private area (its not an ink tattoo, it looks more like a super sun-burned in outline of a heart). Wish I knew where to find more content of her. KarupsHA is one of the few sites with hardcore b/g content of this girl.

01-13-09  03:09pm

Replies (3)
Review
50
Visit Karup's PC

Karup's PC
(1)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +1000's of models. No way there is not a girl for you on here. Barely any American girls, though. Mostly poor English-speaking Eastern European girls. Each girl has her own page with a very clear head shot.
+Newer videos (i.e. anything that has been added in like, the last 1.5 years or something) have both split and full file downloads
+Softcore movie updates separated from hardcore ones
+Excellent download speeds
+Videos are all 640x480. Yes!
+Tons of HQ image sets (1024p), all downloadable as ZIPs.
+100% exclusive content
+Site search. It works very well.
+Good organization to the site.
Cons: -1000's of models. Too many models to keep all updated with sufficient content - most models see one update and done.
-All girls have no last name. How are you supposed to find these girls on other websites? EuroBabeIndex.com does a decent job, but they don't get them all.
-Videos only in WMV
-The very old content does not offer full scene downloads, split files only. AND each split file starts with the "Exclusive to KarupsPC.com" image for 3 seconds, so you can't just join them in your favorite video joining program without any editing, unless you like intermissions in your full movies. They really need to update this content so it matches the newer videos updates.
-Erratic video update schedule. Average is ~1.6 updates per day (580 movies added, YTD)
-Softcore video content made up 73.3% of the last 580 updates (hardcore at 26.7%)
-Watermarked videos
-No bonus material
Bottom Line: Overall it is an excellent site. It is worth the money because of the fact that 100% of the content is original, there is decent flow of updates, both picture sets and videos, and there are just so many girls that is impossible not to find a girl you like and get hooked on. Organization of the site also makes for easy browsing.

Reasons for knocking down the rating:
-Instead of giving girls last names, every girl has just a first name and when there is more than one girl with a name they just follow the name with a number (Lucy 1, Lucy 2, etc.). Yeah, it works in distinguishing all the girls on the site, especially considering most European girls haven't signed up for a porn last name, but this in no way helps people who want to find these girls on other sites. Sure, the girls are similarly named on sites like AMKingdom or 1By-Day, but what about on VideoBox. A search for the names of the girls on sites like VideoBox would not return many relevant results. Case in point: KarupsPC has content for girls like Faith Adams and Whitney Stevens, American girls who actually have porn last names, but they are named simply "Faith" and "Whitney". Sure, a search for Whitney or Faith at DVD sites would yield some successful results, but it would not be as accurate as having the last names of these girls.
-It was only like one or two years ago that KarupsPC updated their whole site, and started providing joinable split scene movies (as well as the full scene downloads). All content that is from 2006 or earlier is in split-scene only, and each split scene part has the 3 second "Exclusive to KarupsPC.com" image which removes the ability to just join the files in a video joiner without having to edit the files first.
-Too much softcore. Need more hardcore updates.
-Inconsistent update schedule. Some days see no updates, some days see 1 update, some see 2, etc.

01-10-09  10:16am

Replies (3)

Shown : 26-50 of 102 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.12 seconds.