In spite of several mails from this user and others - this Canadian site keep hanging on to their regional pricing-deal - they do not care, do they????
It's a pretty good site, but I'm not going to join again, until....
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
[+] HQ Pictures
[+] HD Videos
[+] Good Photo Shoot Quality
[+] Nice Models/Newest Girls
[+] Growing Content since 2001
[-] High Price
[-] No Hardcore
[-] Navigation/Design Could Improve
In the Crack is all about capturing, both on videos and pictures, some of the hottest models most intimate body parts. This website focuses on softcore from striptease to solo masturbation with both pussy and anal insertion.
[+] The good about In the Crack is the models and how sexy they can be on camera. Whether you enjoy them on videos or pictures, the girls are pretty, sexy, gorgeous and know how to flex their body in the sexiest positions you'll ever see. They also perform solo masturbation after they gave you a teasing striptease.
[+] There is an update every 3 days or so and it goes back to 2001 so the archive contains almost 700 scenes of 60 minutes each. The girl usually stripteases gradually until she gets completely naked after which she masturbates with dildos and sex toys both vaginal and anal. There are no hardcore scenes as the website focuses on softcore only with some lesbian scenes. The action takes place both inside and outside with nice and luxurious sets.
[-] There is hardcore sex at all. The content type is limited with softcore, masturbation and female lesbianism. It may also feels redundant after a while...
[+] Each scene is downloadable in different quality formats including a HD version up to 1920x1080. One scene is about 60 minutes which is good for a solo performance.
[-] There is no streaming option so you have to download a scene entirely as you can't download individual parts of the video.
[+] Each gallery has over 150 high quality pictures offered in both small and large sets via thumbnails clicking or .ZIP sets. The shots are very good and professional.
[+] It is simple and user friendly. One can't really get lost in it as it is very basic. The website is fast as well as the download speed. You can browse the models database using a powerful search tools with filters such as their age, nationality or the shooting location. You also get a sneak preview of the next updates.
[-] The design could improve a little although it is clean a new template could not hurt considering that they've been using the same design for a very long time.
[-] Unfortunately, In the Crack is too expensive for what it offers. There is only membership option at $35/month. You get no special offers or bonuses or even rewards such as discounts for loyalty.
Despite all the pros, there are some cons that may harm In the Crack's potential. The content is very good for what it is meant to deliver, the models list is impressing and the quality is very good but the lack of variety and hardcore sex might get you bored after a while unless you are a softcore fan and don't really care about hardcore. The price is kind of high for what it gives.
Another example of oh yeah we'll charge Europe more, as soon as I see I'm paying more than the site is charged in the US I'm out, this really does need to stop. its harming the business more than anything, money is tight for me and lots of others these days, $35 is a high price as it is but then I saw I had to pay and extra $5 for living in Europe, I'm out. Might return if they get rid of this extra cost but my search continues for my summer site.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Excellent quality and HD
Massive content .
Awesome interface and navigation.
Scenes are similar and same consistency.
Looks like many scenes at the same places.
Lots of close ups, ( too many my opinion )
Knowing there was a more recent review I tried to think of a better approach then saying the obvious
and repeat what was just said three weeks ago.
I agree with the previous review, therefore I will
share my experience.
The site is an amazing experience, it is easy to use and navigation is simple and intuitive.
The quality is awesome and brings out incredible details.
The site download speed was good and no problems with my downloads at all. Picture quality was equally impressive with great details and contours were clear.
This site sets a great example of simplicity and ease and invites the user to surf without feeling like your chopping branches through the jungle to get the the fruit. This site is about ease of use and providing a great experience.
I found the site repetitive and for myself why the site is amazing the scenes were after awhile same ole same ole. Now some may not agree, this was my "own" experience. I also did not like the place of scenes often seemed to be around the same places. There is not allot to say wrong about this site. To be far many sites are the same in content. I this being the site is based on a niche makes it seem more so.
Hard to compete with such and awesome review before this one. So I chose more personal review input.
Join for sure, it is worth the money and time and after this you will wish other sites ran like this one.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
- This site continues to push the technical quality boundaries and probably has the highest production value of any site.
- Numbers will be broken down in the bottom line. The video quality is and has been at 1920x1080 for a good while. The picture quality also is an impressive 2400x1800 in "large" quality and come zipped.
- While the update frequency may not be comparable to some of the big networks, they average between 10-11 updates per month.
- The settings on this site are different from most sites you will join. From tropical locations to indoors at large houses to farms and lush fields. The outfits are also fitting of the settings. The only site I know of that goes through this much setup is ALS Scan.
- You'll be hard-pressed to find a model who isn't attractive.
- Download speeds are excellent (95% of max)
- Navigation is easy to use and also gives you the options to search by year, model name, age, nationality and location.
- Will further these in the BL.
- Probably the only real valid con. I think there should be more pictures in the photo sets. Maybe 300 even. It's a con that's a compliment. The pictures are some of the best I've seen, but they skip a lot of the teasing seen in the videos.
- I'm still going to complain about the price, but I only join it once per year so it's not a very big complaint. I use it as my Christmas present to myself.
- This one was more frustration than anything. There was a few days where the site would open, models could be viewed, but when you clicked on a model, it wouldn't let me go into the download section. Lasted 3-4 hours each time. It only happened twice though.
This re-review started out as one of the harder ones I've done. I have mostly joined networks the past year and at first found myself frustrated with the update frequency of In The Crack. Keeping in mind, I had all the content I wanted coming into 2011's updates. It almost was enough of an initial letdown to stop me from rejoining this year, but they had 4 Jinx/Jynx Maze updates and that pushed me to join. As the subscription has went on, my respect and enjoyment from this site keeps growing. This will be slightly different than most reviews I write.
Production values of this site have made me notice production values. I wanted to bitch and gripe about the "only" 11 or so average of updates per month, but when I started looking at the sets, I realized it wouldn't be possible to make that many updates. They have settings ranging from tropical beaches to large houses to country/farm settings and the models' outfits fit the settings accordingly. When I compare this to the majority of sites I have joined in the last year where the setting is almost always the same, the outfits are almost always the same or similar at least, it made me look at this site differently.
On August 13th, 2007, ITC had their first 1920x1080 video, ironically, featuring the model August. Considering this site has been around since 2001, it may sound like half their content would be lesser quality, but it's not true. ITC's original problem was lack of updates. So for once, a lack of updates in the early years of a site's life is going to really help here. An example of this: For the year 2002, they had a total of 11 updates...for the whole year. In May of 2011, they had 13 updates just for May.
As of February 20th, 2012, they have 622 scenes. Of those, 509 have the 1920x1080 option. Those 509 have three video options, 1920x1080, 1280x720 and 640x360. The earlier 113 scenes have two video options of 640x480 and 320x240. This made me re-think complaining about updates since they are releasing 100+ updates per year now, combined with the high production value and high technical quality. Another thing I have noticed about their content is if they have a model I collect or consider a favorite, their content of her will be near or at the top of my list of her content. This is especially true of the pictures. Now I have a complaint.
If I could change one thing about this site it is that I would add more pictures to the sets. With all the time and probably money spent on the best models, settings, outfits, why not bump those picture sets up to 300 or more photos? It would flesh out the updates too.
Possible con for some and I originally listed it as a con in my last review, but I think there is a reason for this. The videos do not have a full scene download option, they are each broken into parts and the parts represent a certain action you're going to see in each part. One part is pissing, one part is stripping, one part is masturbation, one part is close-ups and you get the drift. I would guess these different actions require moving to different locations in the setting and also think it gives the members a choice of what they want to see since I know some are disgusted by pissing, even the close-ups, so you can pick and choose what you want. A full scene option would be nice, since if I like a model, I'm going to download all parts anyway, but I'm more neutral on it than calling it a pro or con.
You will occasionally get the feeling of the scenes being formulaic, but I'm thinking that's what they're going for. You're going to get what you expect from each scene. This is again where I think more photos in the sets would make an improvement.
Another thing I think could help here is more girl/girl scenes. By my count, out of the 622 scenes, they have 17 girl/girl scenes with at least one being girl/girl/girl. Their lesbian scenes are easily some of the best I've seen. I don't even think it needs to become a regular part of the site, but maybe 1 or 2 per month just to break the monotony of the formulaic solo scenes.
With all this being said, I think they suceed at creating a different and unique porn site. I would estimate after this last membership that I have around 90% of their content and have yet to delete one scene. That far outweighs giving me 1,000s of scenes that I will only keep a handful of. It's one of those that I can't recommend highly enough. I do think viewing the content with an open mind, noticing the production value, the work that is put into the sets, adds even more to its value. I still won't join more than once per year though. In a way though, maybe that's a positive too? Instead of joining every 3 months and sifting through the tons of updates, I know I'm downloading most everything new for the past year.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
- Decent Updates
- Stunning Models
- Easy to download ZIP files
- HD Video
- Easy to navigate
- Lots of spread leg poses :-)
- Lots of leg and heels
- nice close up shots
- great headshots in some of the sets
- High resolution
- Updates are not frequent enough
- No boots (not many, maybe one set)
- Price is kind of too high (36 bucks)
I really have enjoyed ITC for the past few months and they've been getting some new models lately. But I would love to see some of the old models make a return visit. Like Lilly Lux who only has 4 sets. I would love to see her return! Also Marlena with 2 sets, and Betty Saint who has a whooping 5 sets. I love these ladies and they have made my fantasies more enjoyable. Lilly Lux for example has a nice bubbly round bouncy ass that I would love to tear up. These girls tease and tease you right. The photography is absolutely stunning but could use some updating and more true high resolution detail. It seems kinda fuzzy when enlarging to full rez. I prefer a detailed photo ala Denys Defranco. I like to see the pores in the womens faces. Maybe because they seem like they are right in front of you (in the bedroom with you) Am I nuts? I don't believe I am but this site will get you into a whacking frenzy I tell you. Beware of this. Just be careful, take your time and browse through. I believe this site has much potential.
While In The Cracks content is very good they've set their downloads up so the fail fairly frequently, I imagine to discourage too much downloading. The larger the file the more likely it is to fail at least once or twice. Also there is no support for resuming so you can't pause a download either. That's also the main cause for download failures I suspect, caused by a brief download interruption from net congestion.
It's not so bad that you can't get and enjoy the content, just be prepared to be frustrated far more then you should be (which is not at all) with a professional site while downloading. With the highest monthly price I've seen in the industry you'd think they could fix the problem, but I think they designed it so the downloads fail a decent amount to curb downloading.
Also they're set up to discourage queuing with rather short timeouts, which I think is only 30 minutes to an hour.
This has become one of my favorite sites, but I'm having a frustrating time with the staying signed in part. A few examples and how the site's quality works against the user experience.
I was downloading a couple of Emy Reyes videos. Two downloads going at a time with the browser's (Firefox) download manager. These scenes were large, one was file "assshowilikedat" which is 1.14 GB and the other was file "ohmygood" which is 1.08 GB. By the time these files were finished downloading, I clicked on the pictures to download the zip and got the message I had to be a member to see the gallery to join the site or login if already a member.
I do think they know this could be a problem since when you log back in, it takes you directly back to where you were, but because I don't download all the scenes, I have to scan across them again, open hard drive to see which I have and don't have and go from there. Also, it's not only on the largest files. Had two in the 600 MB range going and still was signed out when those finished. I'm downloading at a combined 1.7 MB/sec, so that only looks like 10-15 minutes, of no activity, before being logged out.
Is there a way to get around this? Won't really change my high opinion of the site since I have enjoyed everything I have downloaded from it, but it does seem to be a bit of a hassle.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
-really good quality vids and pics
-easy to use site
-multiple vid sizes
-good looking models
-good naming scheme
-file sizes can be too big
-a lot of repetitive content
-bunch of fake boobs
-you can see imperfections in HD
-cant zip pics
-incomplete strip scenes
ive been putting off joining this site for quite some time, but finally joined it. the joining fee is kinda high, but you do get your moneys worth.
the site is well designed. it is sorted by date, but you can search by model or keyword as well. from 2007 and forward theres 1080p, 720p & 640x360. i would have liked 960x540 there too, i feel its the best for people who want quality video but not huge file sizes. download speed was fast, and worked with downloadthemall (firefox download manager). the pictures were high quality but i was surprised how small they were, rarely bigger then 2mp. also there was no zip options. the website guy seems to have fun, the naming scheme on the scenes are quite funny and get a chuckle from the puns throughout the website.
i joined to ogle the female form. i really didnt care about the masturbation scenes, but the few i did download i wasnt blown away by. they were almost too softcore. i love the striping and walking scenes. one thing that REALLY annoyed me was the majority of stripping scenes ended with the panties still on. then the next scene theyd be totally nude but on a bed.
theres some truly beautiful models, they will blow your mind. but i feel the site over uses them. i got bored after seeing the same model do the same stuff over and over again
great website overall, tho i prefer ftv for softcore models being payful
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
- One of the highest quality technical sites on the internet. Breakdown in bottom line.
- Updates started slow in 2001, but are now coming at a rate of roughly 3 per week, includes photos and videos per update.
- Several models you won't see on many other sites and some I've never seen on other sites, the positive to that, also has most of the usual stars.
- Picture sets are zipped and can be downloaded in small or large sizes.
- Plenty of tease, plenty of masturbation and plenty of close-ups.
- Locations are usually almost as beautiful as the models.
- Models, for me, are as close to 100% downloads. Very few if any models that aren't stunningly attractive.
- Navigation is good once you get the hang of it.
- Download speed hasn't been a problem am downloading at 95% of my max speed.
- Videos are split into parts. Almost didn't put this here in cons since there is a pattern to the splits. One may be the lead-in/tease. The next pissing. The next masturbation. The splits don't so much overlap as older split videos did.
- Video quality on older sets pales in comparison to the newer videos.
- Photo sets could be bigger. Seeing that the scenes as a whole total nearly an hour on average, anything less than 100 photos seems to be shorting the photo fans.
I thought I would try to review this site a little differently than normal. The reason being, early in the site's life the updates were sporadic and the quality was okay. They've picked up the pace quite a bit while improving the technical quality a great deal.
From March 2001 to August 5, 2007 the site had a total of only 113 updates. That's less than 2 per month. The quality on these videos tops out at 640x480 and the lower quality option is 320x240.
The photos during this time ranged from 758 high end to 1800 high end.
Starting on August 13th, 2007 the videos top quality jumped to 1920x1080, there also is a 1280x720 option and a 640x360 option.
Besides the big upgrade in quality, the updates started coming more often. Since August 2007 through November 2010, there has been 367 updates or an average of roughly 10 updates per month and all have been with the 1920x1080 option.
The pictures got another boost in late 2007 to 2000 high end and later in 2008 went up to 2400 high end.
I just found that worth mentioning since not only have they increased their updates around 400%, but tripled the technical quality too. That makes the price (35 USD) not a con. It's nice to see a site changing everything for the better.
Problems with the site, there are speculum parts, pissing parts and the close-ups may be a bit much for some. The good thing here, these are usually separated by part so if you would have fast-forwarded those parts, you can just save the hassle by not downloading the parts you don't like.
No problems with the models at all. A very good blend of models from all around the world and a good mix of ethnic backgrounds.
Navigation is broken down for you. You can search by model name. Model nationality. Model age. Year released. And a few bonus points here for naming the videos whatever the scene is named. Instead of some generic number name that no one but their programmer understands.
Unless I missed something there are no boy/girl scenes, but there are some girl/girl scenes with the vast majority being solo. I'm thinking I'm going to need to ask Santa Claus for a new hard drive just for the content I get from this site.
By percent, 76% of the sets are available in 1920x1080. I'm almost positive no other site can say that. My biggest surprise was the diversity of models. It looks to have started out with more Euro models, but it has balanced out with Hispanic, Asian, American (white and black) models showing up too.
I guess if I had to pick something to change it would be to offer a full scene download for those of us that have fast connections. Oh and it signs me out too often. A download had finished, maybe 5 minutes passed and I clicked the next scene to download and was signed out.
That's minor though when you consider the overall quality of this site. Would push the score even higher if the photo sets had more photos in them. Highly recommended especially for tech quality lovers.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
See Denner Review that says it all.
• High Speed Downloads
• Vast library of porno to play around exploring, there are porno girl gems, lot’s of hot girls being XXX.
• INTC is true to their theme with excellent xxx graphic videos and zip files of all their releases The asscrack and the cunt is in your face.
• PSE performance. For the 98% of the time the girls are total xxx porno whores for your viewing pleasure. GYNO.
• Beautiful Locations for Shoots
• Solo XXX enjoy
If solo gyno and viewing the most beautiful girls is your thing go to this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Mostly top-quality videos and stills (primarily from 2007 and forward)
Top models - euro and US and a little from elsewhere
Maybe some of the best full body (teasing) scenes - and of course a LOT - too many - close ups.
Here you get a lot of kinds of strip tease, posing ect. - and done in professional, erotic and sexy ways.
Variation of models
Download manager allowed - thank you (LARGE files)
Good preview - apart from the fact that you do NOT get much videos as preview.
The way the models act, are done with make-up and the final quality - nobody else have this kind of quality!!!!
Zip for PHOTOSETS
High price!!! ($ 34.95)
Still got that DAMN regional pricing - could not get it other ways, so it was - EURO 34.95 - over $ 40.
No full scene downloads - BUT: ok, the files are so large that a full scene - joined - is mostly over 2,5-3 GBs.
Older from 2007/2006 and back are NOT great quality
TOO much close ups - BUT that the name in the game: "In The Crack" - so be prepared to a LOT of pussy/anal close ups.
Updates are not in the top league - 10-12 a month - both videos and stills.
Top quality video files ( all WMV) are simply TOO large - this quality can work in less seize...
Only solo - and some lez.
First of all:
THANKS TO DROOLER for bringing this site to my attention - even if it's some time ago.
So I've been looking/hunting/browsing this site for some time before I got to this - hesitated because I really dislike that regional pricing shit, but ok:
Can't resist anymore!
Because the deal here is very simple to the solo-girl lover: You'll get some magnificent performance from some of the best looking teens/girls/models around - Euro, Easteuro, Latin and US-models.
Done in maybe the best way to day for solo-videos at all.
Great looking girl - but at In The Crack - her videos are close to heaven...
Well, check out the preview.
Even good old Shawna Lenee has the best solo videos, I've seen
All video-files are split - and all in WMV - but since the (each) files are so large - it's not a problem - and you join them if you want.
You get more than 400 videos here - ok, split up (in LARGE clips) and alomst 100 great models - the price is high - and apart from the regional shit - I still think it's worth it - have not regretted my join....
Three sizes of videos (640x360 - 1280x720 - 1920x1080)
Those large video files are sometimes over 1 GB - and if you download all - man, you're going to need pretty much space..
Stills - photosets are: 2400x1800 - for the later stills.
Bottom line - this In The Crack has so much potential and some very erotic/sexy solo material that I got to hand it a 95 for: Quality, sexy performance, models and the way the girls are handled in the videos... still a bit too expensive, regional pricing a big CONS - but a lot of fine material will fill your hard disk a little too fast - because the content is worth it.....
You got to check out this site, if you have not been here, yet...
In this day, when establishing download limits of some kind, or purposely reducing download speeds seems all the rage, ITC is giving me outstanding DL speeds. i have to admit that i find this rather relaxing.
16 months ago, or so, i joined this site and i wasn't getting such great DL speeds and customer support were so kind as to void my membership.
i very much like this site and i'll be sure to rejoin it.
I have to tip my hat to ITC. They shoot girls in photo and video layouts in some of the most beautiful LA homes, Euro Studios, Caribbean Resorts, all very erotic locations. How they afford and book such erotic locations is beyond me. The background soundings are very beautiful locations and are something to be commented about. The girls look incredible in the erotic locations. I wish I could just visit some of the locations. ITC puts the girls in a very erotic location. If solo in your face is a fetish I say join and explore.
I was browsing around ITC the other day and noticed they made a change to their site; now instead of just organizing models by name or release date--which were only accessible by page number, not a letter or date--they have added a new sorting feature where you can browse by release date, model name, model age (at time of shooting of course), nationality, or shooting location.
I was not a huge fan of their overly simplistic system before, so this is a definite improvement for me--and a quick way to point me in the right direction when I am digging through my hard drive.
Their search engine needs an upgrade though; it's still just by term and video category. It doesn't apply to photos which don't always have the same content as the videos from the same shoot. The search results also only give you a list of videos with no direct links to the models' respective shoot pages so you can check out more of her 'Crack portfolio. Hopefully they will give their search engine a little more power in the future.
Wanted - finally - to join this site. It's got damn fine scores from at lot of fellow PUs and at TBP - AND this site has great quality, great models (in very erotic appearance) and first of all great full body video-clips, too.
But trying to join from Europe the rather high price of $34.95 goes up to:
$47.81!!!!!!!!!! (CCBill, again)
Wrote the site - and if I get an answer - positive or negative - I'll let you know (other europeans, foremost, I guess). Hope they got a way around this - a lot of other sites do.
If you’re into solo girl and the occasional girl/girl XXX masturbation with some gyno hardcore…I must say this is one heck of site for you. It will not disappoint with its huge library of archives. The Blue Angel, Jana Jordan and Luscious Lopez recent layouts are must see for any fans of those ladies. The erotic locations for the shoots, models, outfits and the HD photos and videos for many recent updates are amazing in quality and eroticism. 382 layouts with pics and videos. Fast Downloads and a web design that is basic but easy to get around. Lots of gems in the archives.
I commented a few times about the site but I'm still amazed at the excellent material they are shooting.
I'm on my second go round here and with a spankin' new PC, but my downloads are getting slower and slower. I occasionally get upwards of 700k a sec, but lately they've been hovering around 120k, sometimes lower. Not only that, the speed seems to decrease dramatically at first, then pick up very gradually.
I heard that AVG anti-virus slows down your system, and I recently installed that (not the free version). I wonder if that has something to do with it. I hope not. I notice that RB has noted slow server speeds. That's too bad, what with the large files here.
**edit: also not crazy about the prevalence of outdoors shoots for the newer models.
This is my 3rd time as a member to this dirty porno site. Don’t ignore the first 50 videos, they are low quality, compared to HD that are 1/2 ways into the collection, they’re missing a hand full of pics, but the videos are good time erotica viewing. Watch the older stuff, I would say don’t write the old stuff off its worth a peek. A lot of dirty whores in the early stuff where making very good erotica. Those cunts made the site what it is. I believe they taught the staff what ‘Inthecrack’ really meant? The site gets better over time! They know to photo the nude cunt and asshole for sure. Lots of pics and very XXX videos for sure to download. If you like up close spread cunt and ass then don’t hesitate and join, it’s worth a peak.
Awesome site! The girls are pretty high level hot. The asses are round and round. The camera (picture) work provides a super hot perspective that is slightly different than other sites. Usually I filter out pics that don't involve something showing (pussy/tit) however; I've kept tons of the pantie shots for the slide-show collection. The pixels aren't quite as high as something like MET but still pretty high resolution. They also throw in just enough kink (speculum, toys, urine). The movies are 1080 and look great. There's a little more kink in the videos and for me that's a good thing. I don't usually do softcore when it comes to the videos. download manager worked for me. Lots of bang for my buck. I was surprised at how diverse the pic sets are. They have plenty of the usual photo-set posing but here you get the "inthecrack" shots super close, clear, shots of butts, pussies, ass holes (none gaping but ass spreading) Scene locations are exotic and varied (some indoor some outdoor) Also the clothing seems really sexy and they use high contrast colors BRIGHT PINK!!!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.