Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Webmaster Profile A detailed history of activity from this webmaster in all different categories.
Webmaster : SCORE (6)

View Feedback:   Replies (6)         Other:   Site Feedback (462)   |   Replies Received (2)

Incoming Feedback All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites.
Shown : 1-25 of 139 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Comment
1
Visit 50Plus MILFs

50Plus MILFs
(1)

Still being evasive!

Here is how the SCORE webmaster replied to my comment below Pat's:

"We have listened to your comments and all our postings are now available for download on all our websites" but here it comes: "with the exception of HD content which is only available for 5 weeks after the day of posting."

Then later on he/she replied to Pat this way (paraphrased:) "Videos can be downloaded from all sites." Which was always the case! Question still is: since this site practically had HD contents right from the beginning (if I remember correctly) can I now go all the way back and download ALL HD videos or not????

12-03-13  02:37pm

Replies (10)
Comment
2
Visit 50Plus MILFs

50Plus MILFs
(1)

videos can all be downloaded

I have some good news about this companies policy in regards to downloads. I don't exactly know when this happened but it has to be quite recent. All I know is that you can now download all of their library as opposed to only their most recent videos.

I read somewhere that this is for all of their sites but I can only confirm it for this one and 60 plus.

I can confirm that 40 something mag offers full downloads.

10-19-13  10:46am

Replies (7)
Review
3
Visit Nicole Peters

Nicole Peters
(1)

69.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Nicole Peters has a tremendous rack that is on display in every one of the 14 videos and 26 photo sets.

Her boob displays are well done for us titty fans with good angles and massaging.

The production quality is OK; no HD but even the older stuff is reasonably good.

That's about it for the "Pros" list.
Cons: Dormant site. As far as I can tell the last posting on the site was early 2011 but I suspect the material was created much earlier than that.

No hard core. In fact, now that I say that I don't recall seeing any males in any of the content doing anything at all.

Nicole has a furry bush (some would prefer that) that hides her pussy quite effectively. While I like neatly trimmed pubic hair, her bush looks like she has never shaved. It's conceivable, but unlikely, that her material was produced when wild bush was the standard rather than the exception.

It has a deceptive tour site that suggests the site has a lot of content. But at a bit more than $1.15 per very tame and rather short length video available for download it certainly ain't worth it.
Bottom Line: This site is a "throw-in" site that is part of the Score network. It can be selected as an additional site (free) by being a renewing Score member. That's how I became a member.

If you like videos/pix of nice, very large natural mammaries on well proportioned bodies, you'll like Nicole, but as with many "throw-in" sites this one definitely isn't worth the TBP discounted price of $18.

The four videos available on the parent site, Scoreland, are of equal quality so if you want to check out Nicole, sign up with Scoreland and select the Nioole Peters site when you get the opportunity to sign up for the bonus sites.

The 69 score is based on the meager quantity of material, the lack of any updates, the absence of any mid-core or hardcore action and the ridiculous price.

The site does get some minor props for good, not great, video/photo quality.

05-05-13  10:17am

Replies (4)
Review
4
Visit 60 Plus MILFs

60 Plus MILFs
(1)

72.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +They offer content that is rare to see on the net and even more so when you consider that it stars North American women.
+The sex is surprisingly good considering the age of the performers.
+Content is dated and they appear to still be updating.
+Many of the performers look good for their age and seem to still be all natural. Not too mention that they appear to be mostly unknowns.
+You can see the age of each performer in the photo section of the site.
+You can download the photosets of each video as a single zip file and resolution is minimum 1200x800(but many of the pics are 1600x1063).
+You also get access to 50plus milfs.
Cons: -This site like it's sister site 50plus does not allow members to download videos that are older than 6 weeks.
-The site is quite tiny with only 72 videos and they don't update regularly or with any kind of schedule so that number does not grow by much each year.
-Many of their performers have more than one video on this site and on 50 plus so you are getting some similar content.
-Since these women are in their 60's then they don't look like women under 40 or let alone under 30.
Bottom Line: *I debated whether I should do a seperate review of this site or simply add the info on my 50plus review since the transition from both site is seemless to members but I decided to do a seperate one just in case Score decides to split the sites. This way each site will have it's own review and that is important because this site is so much smaller than the olther one.

*The thing to know about this site is that it's women in their 60's having hardcore sex with men that are definetely half their age or younger and don't let the gray ins ome of their hair fool you because they can give as good as they take. Sadly the site also doesn't have any kissing between the performers which is too bad because that would add a lot more passion and heat to the scenes.

*They don't allow downloads other than those released in the last six weeks but because they don't update as often as their 50plus site then you actually get less for your money.

**Bottom line is that there are almost no sites that cater to this type of fetish so even though it's mostly a streaming only site then it could be worth joining at least once to see what it offers and since you get access to 50plus milfs then that's not a bad deal. Of course if they seperate both sites then it will probably take years before they have enough content to make a visit worth it. that is unless more 60 years old start doing porn.**

12-27-12  06:38pm

Replies (0)
Review
5
Visit 50Plus MILFs

50Plus MILFs
(1)

78.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +They offer content from a niche that is rare to find on the net.
+They offer all exclusif content.
+They have a surprisingly wide selection of models who for the most part look natural.
+These women handle some pretty huge dicks and a fair amount of them even do anal with said dicks.
+The sex is often quite good but(see con).
+There are 133 videos that can be streamed online with a resolution of 480p and 720p.
+All the videos have an accompanying photoset that can be downloaded as a single zip file and resolution is at least 1200x800.
+They are still updating and it appears that it's anything from two to four updates per month.
+All content is dated.
+Many of the performers are unknowns so this is probably the only place you'll see them do this kind of stuff.
+You also get access to 60plus milfs.
Cons: -The biggest con against this site is that it's for all intense and purposes a streaming only site. You can only download videos released in the last six weeks.
-The sex is hardcore and quite good but there is no kissing at all which I found disapointing.
-The navigation could be improved with the addition of keywords but then again the site is so small that this isn't such a problem.
-The load time for streaming is inconsistent so that it will sometime load quickly and stream well and other times it takes a while for the video to load and you can forget skipping ahead or suffer slow load time.
-The same performer will sometime have more than one scene so that may or may not be a problem for some.
-These women are in their 50's and although they don't always look their age. They also don't look like young women anymore.
-Videos can only be downloaded in one resolution which is 640x360.
Bottom Line: *This site offers content that is badly underrepresented and therefore it is nice that it exist. It would be a lot nicer if all the videos were made available for download. They have their reason why they aren't but I've never really understood them.

*The important thing to know about this site is that you are watching women in their 50's have hardcore sex with men that are often half their ages and who plow into them like there is no tomorrow. This is not vanilla porn so if that is what you want then you'll want to stear clear because hard pounding vaginal and often anal sex is on the menu on this site. A significant amount of the male performers are Latino and African American so if interracial isn't your thing then you'll also want to stay away.

*The one thing that I wanted to see and which is lacking is kissing before and during the scene and strangely there isn't a single instance where you see this. Kissing would go a long way in increasing the heat factor and since there isn't any then that's make the scene less appealng than it could be.

**Of course making videos available for download would be nice and they lose points because they don't but not as many as some other sites might because their content is too rare to excessively penalize them for a business decision.** They probably already lose customers due to their no download policy anyway.

12-27-12  08:14am

Replies (4)
Review
6
Visit Score Videos

Score Videos
(1)

81.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +You get access to Score HD as well as Score to Go.
+There are over 2000 videos to choose from.
+You can download the videos in MP4 and WMV and basic resolution is 854x480.
+They truly have a variety of models to choose from which are based on age and body type.
+Their content goes back at least a decade and further for some models so that could be a plus for some fans.
+They update with about 2 new scenes per week.
Cons: -None of the scenes are tagged so you can't do a search by keyword.
-They have a lot of older content that hasn't aged well.
-A portion of their content is also availbale on Score HD and the quality is better on that site than here.
-Many of their models that may be your type.
-You can only see the dates of the updates on selected pages so a search by model name will not tell you when the scene was shot or when it was uploaded.
-Part of the content as a synopsis but another part is phtotsets of the scene so you ahev to scroll through a bunch of pages to see what's inside the video.
Bottom Line: *I can see the logic for why Score chose to combine this site with Score HD but in some ways that is a disadvantage to this site because the quality is superior at Score HD and since they both share content then that makes this site's content obsolete. That's only part of their problem because they have a large percentage of older content (production wise) where the quality is rather poor and that clashes even more with their newer stuff. I mean it's kind of nice to offer members stuff made in 90's but if you don't remaster it then it's almost worthless to download except for nostalgia sake.

*There are still a lot of decent suff here but it won't be in HD and you'll have to do a lot of digging to find it. Mind you that is part of the fun so I didn't really mind all that much. Of course I might have had a different opinion if the site had many thousands of videos to go through.

*There are plenty of things they could do to improve the site but the first one is that they should have only one site called Score videos where all the sites send their stuff once it's no longer available for download on these sites. Having two sites offering identical stuff is redundant as well as time consumming. Of course having only one site would mean that the site would have a lot more content and since they don't tag their scenes and navigation is almost non-existant then that would require them to serioulsy improve this new site or suffer the conseqences of displeased customers. Having only one site would require that they have both an HD section as well as a regular one so that membes only intereested in HD content wouldn't wase their time going through content they never plan to view or download.

**The bottom line is that this would probably be a better stand alone site but would anyone join this site if it didn't also offer HD content?**

11-18-12  07:26am

Replies (3)
Review
7
Visit Score HD

Score HD
(2)

89.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +They have a loyalty program where you get access to one extra site each month that you remain a member.
+They truly have a wide variety of different body type models.
+A huge collection of older women models.
+Videos can be dowloaded in MP4 or WMV and basic resolution is 640x360.
+They also offer videos in the 1280x720 resolution.
+You can download all the photosets of each video in a single zip file and resolution is 1280x720.
+All content is dated and they appear to update with 6 new videos per week.
Cons: -There's a preview video that automatically starts each time you go to that videos download section.
-There are no tags on the videos so you actually have to search through each one to find what you are looking for.
-Many of the models may not be what you are into.
-They offer two extra sites with your membership but these aren't necessarily all that good.
**-It's possible to see what each model has on the other Score sites but since this is the only site where you can download all the content then that's not necessarily a good thing.
Bottom Line: **I got badly burned when I joined 40something because they implemented their policy of only allowing downloads of only their most recent updates after TBP had done their review so I was pleasantly surpried when I saw that this site offers almost every video I wanted from that site and a lot more. It's not perfect by far but you at least don't have any surpsise when you join this Score site.

*I'm pretty choosy about what I download and I still managed to find some amazing videos that were well worth the membership. The only warning I might give someone is that you should definetely check out all the models prior to joining because they do have a wide variety of models. You have some cute teens all the way to women in their late 40's and probably a couple in their 50's. There is also an abundance of BBW so if this is your thing than you'll have plenty to be happy about. On the downside. If you prefer women under the age of 30 and who are more on the slim side then this may not be your site of choice. Also anyone looking for more softcore or midcore stuff may want to steer clear as there is very little to be found here.

**The site could really use the addition of tags on their videos. It took me a long time to find what I wanted to download because I had to search through each model's video page. A nice search by keyword would really be appreciated by most members.

**It would also be really great if they offered the 50plus and 60plus content. As it is. You can see which models go on to shoot for those sites but yoiu have to join those sites knowing that only a tiny percentage of their content will be downloadable.

**They also don't necessarily add all of the content from their listed sites so while you do get a large amount. You don't get it all so it's very important to check this site's content before joining or you could be in for a surprise.

11-10-12  11:09am

Replies (0)
Comment
8
Visit 50Plus MILFs

50Plus MILFs
(1)

Any Change?

Does anyone know if they stuck to their new business model of allowing you to download the latest updates only (see the three comments below this one) or have they gone back to their old way of doing things .. in other words allowing you to download everything in their archive? I, frankly, did not expect them to last longer than a couple of months after the change but see that their site link is still up. Any present members?

10-24-12  02:35pm

Replies (8)
Review
9
Visit Score HD

Score HD
(2)

69.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Alot of content.
-Videos look good. No true high def but still nice.
-Tig Ole Bitties Everywhere!
-Alot of girls you cant see much of elsewhere
-Several download options.
-Quick site navigation
-Good site design.
-Supports DL manager
-No DL limits
-Regular updates
-Fast downloads
Cons: -Updates are regular but you dont get much idea whats coming up.
-Alot of newer content IMO is not as good as it once was. (HUGE down for me)
-Not alot of known girls. Both a good thing and bad thing.
-Many recent girls are below my porn standards
Bottom Line: KEEP IN MIND THIS REVIEW IS VERY SUPJECTIVE!

I was a member of Score for over a year from June 2010 to July 2011 or so. This was my first visit back since then, and I was extremely disappointed. Dont get me wrong, there was a good bit of decent content avaiable, but most of the girls Score has shot over the last year seem below what I look for. Socre has always shot some heavier girls, which is fine with me usually, but lately, alot of the heavier and older models they shoot arent that good looking IMO. I found myself watching previews to see if the vids were worth downloading...and many werent after watching those previews.

Long story short....Score has gone downhill IMO. Ive heard others say similar things, but thought Id give it a chance because I wanted to see Eva Notty's content (which is very good). But this time, my stay ends after a month, and I doubt Ill join again anytime soon.

Dont get me wrong...Im sure alot of guys will like some of the stuff I dont. And I wouldnt consider my money completely wasted on them....but given what else is offered for the same price around the internet....Im not sure its worth more than a month anymore...to guys like me anyway. Other sites offer more frequent updates with hotter women at the same price.

SCORE IMO just isnt the same anymore...at least by my taste. The site in general is probably in the range of a 70-80 overall score, but the 69 is in terms of over the last year, which I think is pretty mediocre for them.

Bottom line...check it out if you like big tits. You may like some of the stuff I didnt. If you are anything like me though, you probably wont stay longer than one month.

07-17-12  09:46am

Replies (4)
Review
10
Visit XL Girls

XL Girls
(1)

78.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -) Updates with videos/photos multiple times a week
-) Large variety of models
-) Easy navigation, appealing design
-) Zipped photosets are downloadable (although not with a unique filename)
-) Video and photo quality of new sets is very good (720p and 1200x800 pixels) - i like the colors and contrast and detail in the photos. Makeup is used on the models
-) Plenty of content and variety
-) Download speed was decent for me
Cons: -) Videos are downloadable ONLY for one month after release. After that you CANNOT download videos anymore and you can watch it streaming only.
-) Zipped photosets for download have no unique filename.
-) old content (and that's a big part of the content) is not so great in quality - mostly low-resolution photos.
Bottom Line: As always, this is a BBW-site and as such anybody looking for something else should go elsewhere.

But those who enjoy this kind of content (and you can preview the featured models as a non-member quite well), will definitely like the content inside. You'll find many models in great videos. Video quality of new videos is good (720p) and so is the photography. The overall styling of the model is stylish with makeup - so not as natural as some others might like. Content is exclusive as far as I could see.

However there is one MAJOR ISSUE with the site: Videos are only downloadable for one month after release. After that you CANNOT download videos anymore and you'll have to be happy with streaming (so no viewing later on). To be frank, this sucks. All websites that restrict downloading of videos suck and this is the reason why I didn't give it a 90+ point rating. I'd be happy to pay a premium to download all videos as I please. Nothing during sign-up tells you about that restriction.

Site navigation is easy and straightforward, so is downloading of videos (if they are downloadable) and photos. One minor glitch with photoset downloading: the file naming is "Modelname.zip" so your photosets aren't named to matching videos - you'll have to rename (or auto-rename) the file during download so you don't overwrite existing zip-sets.

Important during signup: They try to screw you when signing up by offering a 19,90 one-month recurring option and a 29,90 one-month NON-recurring option. Be aware what you choose.

Verdict: The action and the models are excellent and I'd somewaht recommend the site. The downloading restriction is downright ugly, hence a big fine in rating-points.

07-14-12  01:15am

Replies (5)
Comment
11
Visit Scoreland

Scoreland
(0)

Scoreland2???

Just got an email solicitation for a "new" site called Scoreland2. (Scoreland2.com) Looks like they created this site to post "remastered" old stuff...and, of course, to extract a few more bucks from current Scoreland subscribers to see their "upgraded" stuff.

05-04-12  09:06am

Replies (0)
Comment
12
Visit Score HD

Score HD
(2)

Updates are slowing down!

You would think that with all the sites that make up Score HD a daily update would not be too much to expect but lately they have really slowed down.

In the short time I have been a member again there have been at least three separate occasions where there was not a single update for three or four days. Times appear to be getting tough for many sites.

04-23-12  12:10pm

Replies (1)
Review
13
Visit Score Videos

Score Videos
(1)

50.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Lots of large breasted women (of varying quality)
Great dirty talk from amber brooks, lana lotts, and dolly.
Cons: Where do I start?!! Score was great when it launched 20 years ago, but has failed to move on. The sets are the same (hardly sets really, truly awful boxes with badly painted walls and squeaky beds), the underwear is borrowed from their granny's charity shop rejects, the filming is dreadful and mosty done on a phone-camera from 10 feet away, the women are fat (Voluptuous) too young and skinny (18Eighteen) or too old (40+). Cant get a modelling job anywhere? Really desperate? Go to Score, they'll take anyone with no discrimination.

If you are however really gorgeous, dont go there as they'll really mess it up. Look at Sarenna Lee - fabulous woman, dreadful videos. In on eshe uses a dilod stuck to a coffee table - terrible, really terrible. What about that french bit - perfect breasts, fab figure, amazing french accent - and they film her from 10 feet away from over a coffee table and nearly drop the camera.
Bottom Line: No disrimination,
No video filming ability,
Old "sets"
Mostly low res
Above all no quality control AT ALL. Cheap and nasty feel.All round terrible a triumph of quantity over quality of any sort.

03-03-12  02:28pm

Replies (0)
Comment
14
Visit 50Plus MILFs

50Plus MILFs
(1)

Warning: you can't download most of videos!

I'm actually a member of 50plusmilfs.com and I didn't know that just recent updates were downloadable just few weeks. The reason I joined this site was just for few videos I can't download now! I don't like watch porn in streaming. So I sent an email and the reason was because of "pirates". This site is part of the Score Group and I've been a member of Scoreland and Scorevideos, and all of their materials can be downloadable.
I feel I got trapped.
So be aware before signing up for this site that you can't download most of videos.

02-29-12  04:32am

Replies (4)
Comment
15
Visit XL Girls

XL Girls
(1)

Limited Downloads

Despite being pricey this would be an excellent site. However, the lack of downloadable content makes this site a great disappointment.

02-26-12  06:40pm

Replies (5)
Review
16
Visit Score HD

Score HD
(2)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Large collection of exclusive videos to stream and download.

Updated a few times a week.

Good quality vids and pic.
Cons: Plain site and average navigation layout.

Updates are constant but not set on any particular schedule.

Videos are high quality but not neccessarily high-def.
Bottom Line: ScoreHd is a great site for checking out voluptious women in soft and hardcore scenes.
The site mainly vocuses on older plump women though there are some scenes with teens and slimmer models. There are a bunch of mini sites that are a part of ScoreHD like 40 something, Curvy girls, and Bootylicous big asses for example. Most scenes are boy girl and you get about three new ones a week. You also get around two solo scenes a week too. Most the action focuses around older big bressted women taking on a younger big cock guy. Most the action is standard though a lot of those women take it up the ass and the cumshots are mixed between tits, asses and facials.

The updates are regular though there is no set schedule on when they come out, they just pop up day to day. You might get a preview the day before of whats coming. The videos are able to be streamed or downloaded. The downloads are available in wmv format only and in small clips or the whole scene in a high and low resolution. The site says its high-def, and the videos are good quailty but don't appear to be true high-def based on todays definition. Each scene has a brief description, a trailer that pops right up, the videos, screencaps, a rating system, a selection for your favorites, and most have a comment section for you to remark on the scene.

You also get access to score videos and score2go. The first is just older vids from various score sites and the second is the same but lower resolution desigened for mobile devices.

Overall this is a good site to check out if you like to see more mature plumper women getting nailed by big cocks. Some of the scenes are scripted others are more gonzo style. All the scenes seem exclusive and most the models are amateur or exclusive to Score too.

02-19-12  11:33am

Replies (3)
Review
17
Visit 50Plus MILFs

50Plus MILFs
(1)

65.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Good selection of milfs and gilfs.

Streaming video quality is good.
Cons: Can only download recent scenes.

Only two updastes a month.
Bottom Line: This site has a lot of potential but falls short. If you like the type of models they have, older sexy women, then the content is great. Many of those sexy seniors love to take cock. They perform hardcore sex inluding anal, facial, and creampies. The women looks great and are paired up with a younger man. The video quality is good. They are available in dvd quality 6630X380 in wmv and mp4 format. You can also rate the scenes and leave comment on them. There are some nice picture sets available for each scene and model too.

The really bad part about this site is the lack of downloadable content. They only offer the most recent two months to download the scenes. All the other past scenes are available but for streaming only. The other bad part is they only update twice a month so that leaves you with a total of four or five scenes to download from the start. There reason behind this is to stop online piracy of there scenes they stated. The problem with that is the site is run by the Score group and they have other grat sites that don't have this limitation on downloads.

In short with the lack of updates and downloads this site is not very good. You do get access to 60 plus milfs, which is basically the same but with slightly older women. If they updated at least twice a week on both sites and allowed all the content to be downloaded it would be a great site but until then its really not worth it.

02-17-12  08:32am

Replies (3)
Comment
18
Visit TnA Tryouts

TnA Tryouts
(0)

Dead Site (edited)

This particular branch of the Score Group appears to be deceased.

EDIT: Apologies, I simply had mystery connection issues. This site is still alive and kicking.

02-13-12  10:55pm

Replies (2)
Comment
19
Visit Scoreland

Scoreland
(0)

HD Downloads Not Available.

One comment I would add, in addition to my review:

I noticfed Sunday evening that when I did download a video, HD is NOT available in the download section. I believe you need to subscribe to Score HD and this is where the HD video downloads are housed. You can stream the videos in HD but cannot download them. I checked a number of recent video updates to make sure this was the case.

As I am not a big Video guy, this is not an issue for me(mostly). However, I believe this might some people might be rubbed the wrong way, especially if you are used to HD quality downloads. I also think that if this is true, the site owners might make this more clear on the members signup screen and advertising. The HD label appears on the videos, but it does not say you cannot download HD video but only stream them.

I would advise those interested in HD video to subscribe to Score HD if HD video is your primary interest.

Given the cost of subscriptions, HD should be available. IMO, this is a bit misleading but I will always give someone the benefit of the doubt. My opinion is that this is a cross-sell marketing strategy but that is just my opinion. I won't knock them for doing this as it is a good way to cross-sell their sites. I just wish they would be upfront in the member area at Scoreland that HD is NOT available for download there.

I have also adjusted my review to indicate this.

01-24-12  04:22pm

Replies (7)
Comment
20
Visit XL Girls

XL Girls
(1)

Curious Pricing Strategy

The TBP price shows $39.99 per month and a LIMITED trial for $2.99.

That pricing matches what the site says...but they have a small print comment under the trial price on the site that says the trial renews at $29.99.

If that's accurate, it obviously pays to by the trial to get the better price.

01-15-12  04:20pm

Replies (0)
Review
21
Visit XL Girls

XL Girls
(1)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -- Large number of models.
-- Easier to naviagte and find content than Scoreland master site.
-- Photography and xxx videos are not over-the-top and the style is classic (think Playboy or Penthouse.) This is either a pro or con, depending on perspective. Will appeal to more classic consumers of erotica.
-- Galleries and vidoes do not jump right into the action. Plenty of tease photos and slow undressing.
-- Images are of high-quality, although sometimes can apper a bit plastic.
Cons: -- Photoshoots sometimes seem to be heavily air-brushed. Can sometimes appear 'plastic'.
-- Might not be as explicit in terms of xxx content as some would prefer. Either a pro or con, see above.
-- For some reason, the DL speed and streaming was slower than at Scoreland.
-- Probably not enough updates to keep long-term subscribers used to large volume. Best for one-month subscriptions.
-- Should be part of Scoreland main subscription.
Bottom Line: Background:

My erotic interests: I am a breast guy. Curvy Women, Slim-and-Stacked or Voluptuous, Natural Women, MILF, Shapely Behinds.

I am primarily a photo guy, as well. I enjoy streaming videos but my primary taste in erotica is photography. I also travel quite frequently, so much of my viewing takes place on an Ipad, after transfer of data. Keep this in mind here.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-- The photography and video presentations are sexy and alluring without being too in-your-face. If you are into things like ass-to-mouth, pile drivers, and things like that, you are not going to find it here. This is either good or bad, depending on your own preferences. About 80% of the photo and video content is softcore posing, either solo or girl-girl. hardcore content is typical fare-classic oral, missionary, doggy, etc., although the scenes usually end with popshots on the breasts rather than face--it's a breast site.

--Navigatiuon and menus are a bit simplified from the information-overload present at Scoreland.

-- Photography could use a little diversification in poses and sets. The photosets often to seem to follow the same script. The photographers could also tone down the airbrushing a bit. Sometimes this pervades the images.

-- Streaming and DL speeds are not as quick as at the master site Scoreland.
-- The site will likely not keep long-term interest. Site should probably be included with a Scoreland subscription and not exist as a seperate pay-site.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Summary:
I added this site when signing up for a one-month subscription to Scoreland. The cost was $19.99 for one month, non-recurring.

BBW stands for Big Beautful Women.

The first two two terms here are relative. I have had an erotic interest in this genre over the years.. I have discovered that 'Big' can mean anything from slightly plump to to morbidly obese. The women shown at XL girls generally falls somewhere in the middle. One characteristic all the models have is that that they all sport large, natural-looking breasts. Most appear to be young, twenty-somethings, althought there are a few MILF models. Pretty faces are the norm.

Beauty is also in the eye of the beholder and this genre won't be for everyone. It is refreshing, however, to see more natural-looking women in this industry--the kind you are likely to encounter on the street. Also, in the photosets, the models will actually smile and don't look irritated or annoyed.

The photos at the site are much more profresinal-looking than most BBW images I have come accross in the past, The photographers could tone down the airburhsing a bit, however.

I guess this genre is defined by anything that does not fit the cookie cutter mold of what the average man would find appealing in terms of physcique. The women at XLGirls look like natural women on the plump side, all with motherly figures.Silicone appears to be used sparingly.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Conclusion:

This is definately a niche site that will appeal to fans of plump, rubenesque women one would find in classic paintings, albeit with large chests.

The site is a mix of photos and videos. There is not a large amount of XX action here and most videos are solo or girl-girl.

IMO, who would like this site:

Photo lovers and those with a fetish for plump, rubenesque, motherly women or those who have a breast fetish. Also, this site will appeal to those who enjoy a more classic, conservative style in their photos and explicit videos.

IMO, who won't like this site:

Those who are looking for the cookie-cutter, well-toned models who spend most of their days in the gym and count their calories. Also, those who rarely view photosets or solo video action or those who enjoy more extreme hardcore action.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Grades(obviously subjective):

Site Navgigation: B
Video Presentation Style: A
Video Quality: A
Photo Presentations: B
Photo Content and Quality: A
The Models Themselves: A
Streaming and DL Speeds: C
Quantity: B
XXX Action: D
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Suggestions for improvement:

Addf this site to the standard Scoreland subscription.

More creativity in photos. Diversify the photosets to include more angles and perspectives. Photosets tend to stick to a classic script.

01-15-12  03:12pm

Replies (11)
Review
22
Visit Scoreland

Scoreland
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -- Huge amount of content.
-- Large variety of model types within the 'big-boob' genre.
-- Fairly decent DL speeds.
-- Photography and xxx videos are not over-the-top and the style is classic (think Playboy or Penthouse.) This is either a pro or con, depending on perspective. Will appeal to more classic consumers of erotica.
-- Galleries and vidoes do not jump right into the action. Plenty of tease photos and slow undressing.
-- Images are of high-quality, although sometimes can apper a bit plastic.
Cons: -- Not the most user-friendly site when it comes to navigation or finding content.
-- Photoshoots sometimes seem to be heavily air-brushed. Can sometimes appear 'plastic'.
-- A little pricey compared to competition.
--- Although the content amount is huge, it is easy to become a bit overwhelmed by it when trying to decide on selections.
-- Might not be as explicit in terms of xxx content as some would prefer. Either a pro or con, see above.
-- No HD Video Download Option--Only Streaming.
Bottom Line: Background:

My erotic interests: I am a breast guy. Curvy Women, Slim-and-Stacked or Voluptuous, Natural Women, MILF, Shapely Behinds.

I am primarily a photo guy, as well. I enjoy streaming videos but my primary taste in erotica is photography. I also travel quite frequently, so much of my viewing takes place on an Ipad, after transfer of data. Keep this in mind here.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Pros and Cons:

-- The amount of content here is huge. I used to subscribe to Voluptuous and Score back in the 90's. The models represent the type of women I find attractive. You can find content dating back to the 90's on the site.

-- Streaming and DL speeds seem to be up to par and there are no problems to report here, so far.

-- The photography and video presentations are sexy and alluring without being too in-your-face. If you are into things like ass-to-mouth, pile drivers, and things like that, you are not going to find it here. This is either good or bad, depending on your own preferences. About 80% of the photo and video content is softcore posing, either solo or girl-girl. hardcore content is typical fare-classic oral, missionary, doggy, etc., although the scenes usually end with popshots on the breasts rather than face--it's a breast site.

-- It can be a bit difficult at first to navigate around the huge of amount of content in the archives. More user-friendly options would be nice.

-- Photography could use a little diversification in poses and sets. The photosets often to seem to follow the same script. The photographers could also tone down the airbrushing a bit. Sometimes this pervades the images.

-- Subscription rates also seem to be a little bit higher in cost than the typical site.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Conclusion:

This is definately a niche site that will appeal to fans of large-breasted women, especially of the voluptuous and/or curvy variety. Models can range from thin-and-stacked to soft and voluptuous.

The site is a mix of photos and videos. If viewing softcore images of chesty, well-endowed women is your thing, you won't be dissapointed. There is a fair amount of xxx video action to be found, but the majority of presentations, both photo and video, are softcore solo or girl-girl.

Update 1/24/12-- HD Video Downloading is NOT an option. One can only stream HD videos. I discovered this recently. One must subscribe to Score HD to download HD.

IMO, who would like this site:

Photo lovers and those with a breast fetish who enjoy a variety of body types and those who enjoy a more classic conservative style in their photos and explicit videos.

Who won't like this site:

Those who rarely view photosets or solo video action or those who enjoy more extreme hardcore action.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Grades(obviously subjective):

Site Navgigation: C-
Video Presentation Style: A
Video Quality: A
Photo Presentations: B+
Photo Content and Quality: A
The Models Themselves: A
Streaming and DL Speeds: A
Quantity: A+
XXX Action: C

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Suggestions for improvement:

Improve the site navigation utility and add options to make the user experience a bit easier.

01-15-12  12:04pm

Replies (9)
Comment
23
Visit Naughty Mag

Naughty Mag
(0)

Anybody been here lately? Sasha Bleu

A model I had found on a very few sites, Sasha Bleu, seems to go by several variations of aliases, all starting with Sasha. I've seen several preview sets of her that have this Naughty Mag watermark on them. I'm not real familiar with the Score Group except that I know they usually are focused on big boobs. TBP review looks pretty good on it, but no recent reviews or comments, so I'm just curious if anyone has tried it recently. Not being a huge fan of big boobs, I don't know if it's worth a membership just to get the Sasha content or not.

08-06-11  02:22pm

Replies (0)
Comment
24
Visit 18 Eighteen

18 Eighteen
(0)

CANNOT download movies in HD, can only stream.

This is one of the stupidest things I've seen in a while. On this site the video previews in the tour area all play in 720 HD, but once you become a member can you download it in that file size? NOPE! You can stream it like that, but if you want to download it the biggest video size you can get is 640 x 360. What kind of crap is that? Talk about frustrating.

04-18-11  01:26am

Replies (1)
Review
25
Visit 40 Something Mag

40 Something Mag
(0)

50.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Decent selection of natural and enhanced models to choose from.
-Photosets can be dowloaded in 800 x 600 and 1600 x 1200 resolution.
-They are still updating.
-Content is dated.
-You can search by models name, body type hair color and type of shoot.
Cons: -The bulk of the videos are streaming only.
-They only have 270 videos.
-They only have 150 photosets.
-They only have 13 magazines.
-There is a large logo on each pic.
-Their preview pages are serioulsy misleading.
-Their pages are clutered with offers from other sites.
Bottom Line: -There must have been some serious changes at 40something since January of this year because TBP gave this site an 82 and claimed that videos were downloadable. In my book 10 downloadable videos out of 270 is not enough to claim that the site allows downloads.

-This is one of the worst case of half truth and lies that I've seen a site do in many years. I joined based on the TBP review and the sites own preview pages. First lie. They claim that you can get access to every 40something magazine ever printed. Yes, you do but you will have to buy them so not free. Second lie: They mention all the videos and pic sets that the model has and they do say x number of videos from other sites but if they aren't availbale on your site then why bring them up. The only conclusion I see is that they know that people like me will assume that these videos are available on their site but content can be also be found on those other sites.

This site belongs to the score group which owns a huge amount of other sites but because of this site I don't think I will ever join any of their otrher sites for fear that they are lying on that site as well.

***This site is to be avoided at all cost or you will regret wasting your 20$ like I am at this very moment.***

04-17-11  06:50pm

Replies (8)

Shown : 1-25 of 139 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.47 seconds.