Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Webmaster Profile A detailed history of activity from this webmaster in all different categories.
Webmaster : Kinkster John (0)

View Feedback:   Replies (0)         Other:   Site Feedback (10)   |   Replies Received (0)

Incoming Feedback All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites.
Shown : 1-5 of 5  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit Sexually Broken

Sexually Broken
(1)

92.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill
-147 MP4 HD videos 1280x720, 6000k. Simply beautiful quality.
-Photo sets(1200x675)of each shoot are zip downloadable.
-Each update comes with a few sample photos and a fairly complete description of the action. For me a huge plus.
-Updates every Monday , Wednesday and Friday for three updates a week
-Nice variety of models: Black, Asian, Latina, blondes, brunettes, redheads. Some very petite, such as under 5 feet tall. Some are large, but not plus size. A few have tattoos or piercing, but most do not. Some have implants, but most do not. Most are well known porn stars, but many are not.
-Unusually high level of attractive models.
-Genuine enthusiasm. The models love the action as each one has multiple intense orgasms.
-Extremely creative content.
Cons: -The photo sets are split into two parts. One is Directors Picks and the other is called Scene Photography. Since both have scenes from the video, I have no idea why they are split into two sections.
-The videos have interviews, both before and after the scenes. The pre shoot interview may be at the beginning or at the end. In some videos the sex starts first, then the post then the pre shoot interview. Comes across as unpredictable and random. The rest of the site and its contents show a lot of thought, so why?
-Only two male models. One is Matt, who runs the site and an unnamed Black man with a huge penis.
-Neither male model cums, except in only one scene. This is hard to believe and I suspect has been edited out. In the forum Matt explained that cumming reduces his sexual energy. I think that scenes can end with a cum shot without taking anything away from the overall quality.
-Updates listed in date order only. There is a way to search by name, but no search engine.
Bottom Line: This site features a combination of bondage and sex. I am not into bondage or BDSM of any kind, but I like forceful, even rough sex. Everyone has biases, so you should know where I am coming from. This site is definitely different from plain vanilla porn and is not for everybody. The action can be quite intense, but not over the top crazy like many BDSM sites.

Honestly, I was thinking about joining a few weeks ago, but the recent events in Cleveland turned me off big time. What those women endured was more than enough to make me think I should not join. But I am glad that I did. The reality was disgusting, but the fantasy presented here is very, very different.

What this site features are very attractive models who get very intense multiple orgasms in every scene. The enthusiasm is genuine. Interestingly , the male talent and site owner Matt cums in only one scene. It is not focused on him and his pleasure. There are no misogynistic insults and no verbal disrespect. He asks them about their sexual preferences and that is what they get.

Scenes start with the model getting tied up and then they pleasure Matt orally. There may be vaginal penetration, but anal is uncommon. He encourages them to perform well with nice words and the promise of a reward soon-usually an orgasm by vibrator or a sybian. Multiple, very intense orgasms are the norm. Matt goes all out to please, although he never performs cunnilingus. I guess we all have our limits.

The models are generally attractive porn stars. Some are well known, some less so. Some models are former dancers or athletes with nice bodies. There is a lot of ethnic variety, as well as by body type.

The inevitable comparison is with Sex and Submission. While that site focuses on a scenario and has a few different locations, this site is more like gonzo. There is only one video with a story and the location is always the same. I like a little bit of story and a little bit of acting. I enjoyed this site a lot, but it is clear that there is room for improvement.

With three updates a week, this site is a solid A+ in my book.

05-26-13  01:27pm

Replies (4)
Review
2
Visit Infernal Restraints

Infernal Restraints
(1)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 290 scenes
- Updates weekly with the addition of one scene
- Innovative BDSM ‘tools’
- Good mix of mainstream and fetish models
- Supports download managers
- Fast download speeds
- Photos available
Cons: - Very expensive
- ‘Captcha’ on signup can be annoying
- Need more file resolution options
Bottom Line: This site is definitely NOT for the faint-hearted for three reasons: first, this is probably among the most intense BDSM sites available today, second, the price has to make it one of the most expensive porn memberships today, and third, some of the newest scenes come in at over 3GB in size.

If you like BDSM and are familiar with the Kink.com sites, then think of this as a mashup of Device Bondage and Sex and Submission with the ‘nasty’ factor turned up. The site uses a lot of innovative bondage tools and devices, many of which appear to be made rather than bought. Each scene is between 30 minutes and an hour long and has several ‘chapters’ where the bondage is changed. (Like other BDSM sites, the scenes also include an interview where the model makes it clear that she consents and can stop the scene.) Most of the scenes occur indoors in a dungeon setting, though there are also some scenes shot outdoors. Production values are very good. Many, but still a minority of the scenes, feature some kind of sex act, either oral or vaginal. There is some anal play, but I’ve yet to find a scene with anal intercourse. Since the site is about BDSM I accept that the sex is secondary.

The site has a mix of mainstream models who dabble in fetish stuff (Sasha Knox and Hailey Young, for example) and models who specialize in fetish scenes (Wenona, for example). The models are all under 25, most are petite and with very few exceptions all are Caucasian. One good sign as to how the site treats the models is that there are several who make repeat visits to get abused.

The site currently has 290 scenes available with one new scene being added weekly. As should be expected, the oldest scenes (uploaded in 2006) don’t have the same video quality as the newer scenes. Most scenes have download options for resolution and a few offer different file types too. The most common file type is mp4 though a lot of the older files that say they’re mp4 come in as .rm. The newest uploads have two options for resolutions. I went with the highest which is 1280x720, 7500kb/s and 23fps. An issue that many may have is the file size, which with some of the newer uploads can exceed 3GB. That’s a lot of data if your ISP imposes a limit. The lower resolution is intended for mobile devices and comes in at 480x270, 1400kb/s and 23fps. The obvious problem with this is that there is a wide chasm between the two sizes that really should be bridged with a third option.

Photos are also available as zips but not as singles. New photos are 1200x785 while the older ones are obviously smaller.

Site layout is simple but effective. It looks and functions a lot like a Kink.com site if you’re familiar with them. You can either have a ‘full’ or ‘brief’ view of the scenes on the page and selecting a scene opens a page where you can stream or download the scene and download the photos. There is also a fairly detailed description of each scene which is useful.

The site allows download managers and doesn’t appear to have any download limits. Download speeds were good.

Logging in requires the username and password be entered each time as well as a two-word captcha. I found one of those ‘words’ was always easy to read, but the second was much more difficult and often caused me to fail to enter it properly. When that happens you go back for a second try but you need to enter your username and password again.

The 800lb gorilla in the room is whether the site is worth the $65 price. Part of me says that it is because the production costs here have to be much higher than a more usual hardcore site. With the more mainstream site you hire a woman and a man and pull out an old leather couch and you can make a porno. No so here. I’m guessing that the models here get paid a premium to do this work and the bondage equipment can't be cheap to buy or make. So in that sense, it might be worth the exceptionally high price. Arguing against the high price is that other BDSM sites must have similar costs and can manage a more reasonable price. Sites like Kink probably have better economies of scale, but this site can’t justify a price that’s double what the competitors are charging. Also, this site has some ‘sister’ sites (Sexually Broken, for example) which appear to use many of the same models, sets and equipment but charge less than half what this site charges.

I know this is a personal thing for me that others don’t share, and I didn’t include this as a con or include it in the score, but I really wish fetish sites put up more behind-the-scenes videos. With so many of the bondage setups used on this site being innovative I’d like to see some of the technical bits of getting the model into them.

If you’re into BDSM that pushes the limits and can justify spending the money, this is site that is worth a visit. With the price as high as it is though, this won’t be a site that I join once in a while to get updates.

05-12-13  02:14pm

Replies (1)
Comment
3
Visit Infernal Restraints

Infernal Restraints
(1)

Mixed thoughts on an expensive site

wow !!! Lots of content ...mostly high quality video and pics. Original content and some is just plain odd. I had to laugh at one scene with a girls head in a bottle with a jumping frog. What kind of weird crap is that? Anyway, this is certainly a one of a kind site. Real weird stuff. Bad news is its a bit of an organizational train wreck, which sucks for an expensive site. Sometimes pictures sometimes not. Download "all" does not really download all pictures sometimes. Sometimes you can preview before downloading zip file, sometimes not. Some video files are great, some are not, and some don't even run. Sometimes you can see 85 pages of content, sometimes you can only see 12 or 13 for some reason.
So a real mixed bag. I don't regret giving it a shot, but I won't be back. Too expensive for too many problems. But I have to admit this site is in a content world of its own. Not so sure that's good, but it is real different.

09-04-12  10:50pm

Replies (0)
Comment
4
Visit Infernal Restraints

Infernal Restraints
(1)

Wow!

Wow, I mean I realize it probably costs a ton to get these models to perform, but $65 a month? That's three months access at some of these network sites. There has to be at least one bondage site that is half the cost, but I have to admit by looking at the previews that there seems to be a limitless supply of original content here.

good thing I'm not a bondgage fan at all, I'd hate to have to pay these prices.

12-20-10  10:01am

Replies (0)
Review
5
Visit Hardtied

Hardtied
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Extreme site with various types of bondage and stimulation of models provided. Most models are very attractive, and some moderately attractive, like Melody who is very enjoyable to watch when stimulated. Different forms of punishment and forced orgasms are very entertaining. Updates do come once a week, and some models such as Cherry Torn, Calico and Pinky have several shoots. Most recent shoot of Wenona is a keeper.
Dowload speeds are excellent and it's possible to load multiple clips at the same time to a PC or iPod. Photography is okay.
Cons: Expensive at $35.00 per month. Navigation can be a problem. No way to gain direct access to a particular model other than scrolling through the different shoots. Lighting in some scenes is dark and could be improved. No bonus sites or materials. A discount to one of their other sites like Infernal Restraints would be worthwhile, or at least the ability to purchase individual clips like Kink.com is currently doing. They should consider doing some electrical stimulation such as on the nipples and labia as is done on other BDSM site that use electricity.
Photos are just okay, with too many of them shot at bad angles, and some missing the best part of the model's predicament.
Bottom Line: Overall, a very good site that needs to grow and provide bonus materials. Cost is high, and for that amount of money, a few extras would be welcome.
For the connoisseur of BDSM, this is a site worth looking at. Some of the scenes, such as with Mei, Kali, Anna Rose and a few others are excellent and well worth dowloading and keeping. Older materials include such well known models as Shannon Kelly, Kitty Langdon and Jade Marxx, to name but a few. Variety of bondage positions, including anal and double penetration along with electrified clit stimulators is extensive.
Hardtied might provide, as a bonus, some of their older clips from the Insex Archives. Then this would be a terrific site.

07-25-08  12:32pm

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-5 of 5  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.05 seconds.