| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
26
|
FEMJOY
(1)
|
|
02-06-10 03:20am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
27
|
FEMJOY
(1)
|
|
02-03-10 09:40am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
28
|
FEMJOY
(1)
|
|
02-02-10 07:06am
Replies (2)
|
Review
29
|
FEMJOY
(1)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+++ massive model archive
+++ up to 3 updates per day
++ lot of contributing photographers (+180)
++ big hdv video archive
++ images up to 4000 px
+ functional site
+ Iphone / PSP compatible |
| Cons: |
--- download limit & partially slow
--- search function is unhandy
-- just one good photographer (Stefan Soell)
-- bulk photography
- hard to get in the mood
- they make you feel how hard they want your money |
| Bottom Line: |
After X-art, I was seeking for another compelling site full of nude teens with a higher rate of updates and a solid archive.
Femjoy looked familiar to a couple of other sites I've seen before, which gave me a "related-to" feeling but didn't care for the moment.
They have a huge archive for galleries and HD videos is an acceptable quality. It was a little hard to get into the right mood by all the functional and plain and passionless presentation of the girls.
Stefan Soell seem to be the best of all contributors there, at least for me.
Femjoy is a good site for outdoor fans and those who like young girls being naturally naked.
Don't expect the girls doing anything fancy, they don't! |
|
02-02-10 07:00am
Replies (8)
|
Comment
30
|
FEMJOY
(1)
|
|
08-14-09 06:55pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
31
|
FEMJOY
(1)
|
|
07-01-09 03:42pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
32
|
FEMJOY
(1)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Very natural looking models
- Classy, semi artistic and professional photography
- The atmosphere of the photos are very nice
- Constant updates to the site |
| Cons: |
- No hardcore |
| Bottom Line: |
Femjoy is not a site for everyone. It's not smut and not a blood pressure raising hard core site. The site studies the enigma of natural beauty itself and put it in place in softcore orientation. Although the term 'erotic' can be applied semi-heartedly, Femjoy can be catergorized as 'classical nude glamour softcore', something you would find in the photography sections of book stores.
In my mind, Femjoy is one of the most natural softcore photography sites I have visted. The models are usually in their most natural state, in many sizes and for some seeing, models with untrimmed pubes can be something we think back to in the 1970s and 1980s. The lack of using heavy makeup also brings the perspective of realistic beauty back to life. If you're bored of looking at nudes, also check out the scenaries of the photos.
As for the photography, it is professional and definately classic glamour. Some of the photo's artistic styles are cleary taught out from master glamour photographer John Kelly.
I would rank this site as one of the top 5 natural softcore sites on the Internet. Other than Femjoy, I'd also recommend MetArt, like what other reviewers have mentioned. |
|
06-17-09 04:26am
Replies (0)
|
Review
33
|
FEMJOY
(1)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
PROS:
-Over 200.000 poster size photos
-All photo series come in up to 4000 pixels resolution.
-Photo sets available in 3 different sizes: hi res, med res, lo res
-Zips for photo sets, for each res: hi, med, lo
-over 700 models, many are extremely attractive
-over 100 contributing photographers
-830 additions per year
-10 new HDV movies per month
-Tiny watermark
-No download limit
-No DRM
-choice of multiple formats and definitions for downloading videos
-special new low price $29.95(USD) for 60 days/recurring
-billing from CCBill, a reliable outside billing company |
| Cons: |
PROS: (continued)
-content 100% exclusive to this site
-updates are dated
-no automatic time-out from site
CONS:
-Basic navigation, could be a little easier to use. To download a photoset or video, select the model, look at the photosets or videos available, select the photoset or video you want, then (if it's a photoset) select the res you want, and download the zip file. At met-art, it just seems
simpler to download the zip files than at femjoy.
-Searching is easier at met-art than at femjoy.
-Site is strictly soft softcore. No hardcore at all. Girls only. Boys not allowed. If a girl
touches herself, or one girl touches another, it is the lightest brush, not erotic at all.
-Don't always prominently list who the photographer is for each photo set or video. So if you want to know the photographer (to keep a personal, manually created list of the photosets, date of posting, title, photographer, etc.), you have to hunt around to see who the photographer was. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS: (continued)
-Limited to slender white European teen. Site advertises that models are from all over the world, but everything I saw looked to be indistinguishable from teen European. "Our girls come from all over the world - even from Spain, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the US, Scandinavia and not only from Eastern Europe."
Well, from the geography I learned in the Dark Ages (1960s), Spain, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and Scandinavia were in Europe. The US might not be in Europe, but how can you tell a US model from a model who is European? Simple answer: Look at her passport. Duh. Everything I saw at Femjoy was European teen, as far as I could tell.
-Most photo sets are solo models
-A small percentage of photo sets and videos are two female models. But there is no erotic contact
between the models, unless you can sense the Vulcan mind-meld auras within the models.
-Model bios: none
BOTTOM LINE:
This is one of the better/best softcore European teen glamour photo mega-sites.
The site ranks up there with met-art, mplstudios, justteensite, mypreciousvirgins, etc.
The main value is in the photosets. Huge number of models, a large number should appeal to almost
anyone's taste (but almost all models are slender white European teen).
There are a number of short videos, 2-6 minutes long, super softcore, high quality, great focus,
good to very-good color, good lighting, nice soundtrack.
The videos are more interesting than met-art videos, but that is not saying much. You are watching a lovely girl doing very little: she stands up, sits, lies down, smiles, walks. There is no plot to the videos. Another nice factor in the Femjoy videos is how clean they are, in the sense you don't hear a distracting photographer giving directions, you don't have annoying photoflashes going off in the video shoot.
There are a large number of Femjoy member comments inside the site about how great the models look, how wonderful the photography is, how artistic and erotic the photos and videos are, how this is a wonderfully clean site with no dirty, vulgar elements. If you are into super softcore, with models wearing minimal makeup, no tease at all (unless you supply it yourself in your own mind), this is the site for you.
Even though Met-art is very simllar to this site in the softcore approach, I find Met-art photos
much more satisfying: the models at Met-art are better looking because of greater use of make-up,
greater use of costumes, with more effort put into making the photoshoots more individualistic with varied sets and backgrounds.
I think Met-art navigation is simpler and easier to use to search the models available. It is also
easier to download the files at Met-art.
If Femjoy deserves an 87 for its fine photography, then Met-art deserves a 97 for its fine, more erotic photography, plus easier navigation, plus free video cams. There are no free video cams at Femjoy. |
|
06-14-09 09:49pm
Replies (4)
|
Comment
34
|
FEMJOY
(1)
|
|
06-08-09 04:13pm
Replies (4)
|
Comment
35
|
FEMJOY
(1)
|
|
05-22-09 09:11pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
36
|
FEMJOY
(1)
|
|
05-17-09 12:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
37
|
FEMJOY
(1)
|
|
05-11-09 11:53am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
38
|
FEMJOY
(1)
|
|
05-10-09 08:54pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
39
|
FEMJOY
(1)
|
|
05-08-09 05:42pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
40
|
FEMJOY
(1)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
· tons of new teens
· images up to 4000px
· hdv movies (several formats)
· 100 contributing artists
· clean and simple design
· good update frequence
· iPhone version |
| Cons: |
· speed occasionally low
· download limit
· worst search ever
· flip-book photography
· 99% nude girls from the first image
· 1-3 sets for most of the teens |
| Bottom Line: |
Like Met Art, Femjoy offers a good variance and tremendious amount of teen content.
You seek for young and innocent looking teens and natural photography, you're at the right place. Femjoy will blast you away with thrilling softcore and fulltime nudes.
I am personally overdozed with the teen-niché and seek for a site with real women now. |
|
01-28-09 04:45am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
41
|
FEMJOY
(1)
|
|
12-01-08 07:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
42
|
FEMJOY
(1)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+High Quality photos
+HD Quality videos
+Lots of updates
+Good mix of models |
| Cons: |
-Every set pretty much starts off with the model already nude. No teasing and/or clothes at all.
-Each gallery is set up where the top 1/3 is the highest quality(normally 3000 or 4000px) the middle is 2nd highest and bottom 1/3 is lowest. Would be nice if you could set it up so each gallery automatically came up in the highest quality.
-With no clothing, all the sets seem to start running together and looking the same.
-And as others have stated, most of the photos don't seem to have much life.
-Videos appear to be nothing more then moving photoshoots. You'll get a few closeups but doesn't really seem to be much reason to watch them. |
| Bottom Line: |
I logged into my Playboy Cyber Club account the other day and saw a offer for so much off a FemJoy subscription for Playboy subscribers. So figured I'd give it a shot. The quality of the site is outstanding, both photos and videos. Unfortuantly each set starts with the model fully nude. No clothes, lingerie, bra & panties or anything else like that. So after awhile each model and each of her sets start to blur together and feel the same.
While the photos are great quality, I didn't like how in the preview gallery the top 1/3 is the highest quality(normally 3000 or 4000px) the middle is 2nd highest and bottom 1/3 is lowest. Would be nice if you could set it up so each gallery automatically came up in the highest quality.
The vidoes are in HD and as good of qualty as other sites HD videos (Playboy, MCNudes). But with no clothing or anything else, there doesn't seem to really be much of a reason to watch the videos.
Overall the site is great at what it does. Nice quality photos and vidoes, which is a big selling point for me. Most of the models are very attractive. It's just the sets seem blah. With no clothing, the only real difference between each set is the background. I myself like the mixing it up that other sites do. So if you want nothing but nude women, then this site would be great for you. If you like any kind of tease, then I'd advise against FemJoy. |
|
11-04-08 06:00am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
43
|
FEMJOY
(1)
|
|
10-22-08 12:37pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
44
|
FEMJOY
(1)
|
|
10-01-08 01:46am
Replies (1)
|
Review
45
|
FEMJOY
(1)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+++ beautiful locations
+++ beautiful models
+++ mostly right mood of the models
+++ professional photography
++ "best of FEMJOY"
+ daily updates
+ variety of video formats
+ reasonable default for pic size (fits into normal screen) |
| Cons: |
-- nude-only, almost no undressing
-- movies are recording of photoshoots
- no "extras"
- lack of categorized search |
| Bottom Line: |
After trying MetArt (see my review) I've decided to try another top-rated site with about the same idea. As a result of reviews being that close, I will mostly compare these two sites.
But first, I shall note that screenshot on PU doesn't do justice FEMJOY's home page - it looks really ugly, while FEMJOY's design is very clean and clear.
Now to site comparison on different accounts:
1. "Art". IMHO MetArt is a bit better in this category (while FEMJOY is good, MetArt's pictures are IMHO a bit more "artistic", at least the covers).
2. Beauty of the girls. IMHO about the same ("stunning" is the right word for it).
3. Mood of the girls. As it was mentioned about MetArt, girls there look "bored"; as Monahan has put it for MetArt, "There is no real "fire" in many (most?) of the pics". It is IMHO MUCH better with FEMJOY, so FEMJOY is a clear winner here.
4. Quality of photography. IMHO about the same (MetArt has better "covers", but FEMJOY gets it IMHO a bit better "inside" galleries).
5. Beauty of locations. IMHO MetArt has a bit better locations overall.
6. Variety. Because of clothing and undressing on MetArt, they win this one.
7. "Extras". Free web-cam obviously brings MetArt some extra value.
Bottom line: these 2 sites (FEMJOY and MetArt) represent about the same niche, and while they obviously have their differences, overall I can't say that one is clearly better than the other one, hence the same rating for FEMJOY as it was for MetArt. |
|
10-01-08 12:44am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
46
|
FEMJOY
(1)
|
|
09-04-08 06:52am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
47
|
FEMJOY
(1)
|
|
08-27-08 12:56pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
48
|
FEMJOY
(1)
|
|
08-27-08 04:41am
Replies (2)
|
Review
49
|
FEMJOY
(1)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* Beautiful Girls
* Lots and lots of Girls
* Very High Quality Pics & Videos
* Download Different Video Formats
* Regularly updated |
| Cons: |
* Download limits do apply
* Lack of Creativity
* A little bit expensive |
| Bottom Line: |
* For those who are only willing to fork out a few months worth of membership, download limits do apply, 2 gigs an hour, might seem like a lot, but for those with fast and unlimited internet access, and a mind set to download a lot of content, that is really not much, (this is called leeching).
* Gorgeous naked girls, no doubts about it, young hotties, and a whole lot of them,(which might collide against my previous comment).
* Easy and simple to use menus.
* Above all, absolutely amazing and stunning girls, and well worth getting a membership, just sit back and relax, this site is surely worth it. |
|
08-02-08 10:32am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
50
|
FEMJOY
(1)
|
|
06-30-08 07:57am
Replies (0)
|
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.8 seconds.
|
|