Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Webmaster Profile A detailed history of activity from this webmaster in all different categories.
Webmaster : PornPros (0)

View Feedback:   Replies (0)         Other:   Site Feedback (478)   |   Replies Received (0)

Incoming Feedback All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites.
Shown : 26-50 of 144 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
26
Visit Casting Couch X

Casting Couch X
(2)

82.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - High quality hdtv scenes
- Hot, fresh girls with a semi-amateur charme
- Decent download speeds
- Special deals for the sister sites (passionhd etc)
- Straight and simple navigation
Cons: - Repetitive scenes
- Infrequent updates
- No filename specification
- Still pretty small collection
Bottom Line: Movies are coming in:

1920x1080 mpeg (about 2,5-3 GB per scene)
1920x1080 wmv (about 2,5-3 GB per scene)
750x422 mp4

Streaming:
HD and LD

Pictures are coming in

Screencaps (single download only)
HD Pics (appr. 300 per scene, 1500x100px, download in one ZIP file)


Castingcouchx.com is one of the new BangBros "we're-going-stylish-boys!" spin off's, along with passionhd and puremature. The theme is pretty straight forward: young girls who want to enter the porn business are being casted in a 1 on 1 session. Fortunately, it usually doesn't take much to convince the girl, that taking off her clothes and go for a trial sex scene is THE way to achieve this goal. Been there, seen that, got the .mpeg.

Casting videos are probably as old as internet porn (probably even older), and this site doesn't elevate this noble setting to a new level or something. It's plain and simple and the subscriber knows exactly what to expect, which - given the usual standards - is quite good in my books.

Site navigation is simple but ok. The scenes are sorted by release date, each scene comes with a screencap, date and first name of the girl, as well as the obligatory user rating. You can also browse the girls by name, which is currently a rather useless feature, because there are so few scenes available that it's kinda hard to lose track or get lost in the ammount of content. There are currently 23 scenes available (as of 12-07-2012).

Each scene is about 40 minutes long with 5-10 minutes of chatting, a couple of minutes of undressing and the rest is hardcore. This, I have to admit, is also the biggest weakness of the site in my opinion. It's quite repetitive. Almost every scene is a blueprint, the camera angles, the positions, the final facial, it all looks quite the same. Variety is definitely not the center of competence of this site. But otoh, that's not really neccessary, because the scenes are well done and very entertaining.

The girls are all good looking, there's not much silicone (I think I've spotted just one case of plastic boobs) nor tattoo madness. 10 Points to Gryfindor here.
A minor drawback is, that all the girls are just listed with their first names, which emphasizes the pseudo-amateur factor, but doesn't really help the collector.

Technically, the scenes are of a pretty high standard. However, apparently each scene is shot with two different cameras, a head-cam and a static cam. Those cameras are producing notably different pictures, which means a lot of changing during a scene. This is not a drama though, just some high-level-moaning.

One thing that really annoys me is the fact that all videos are coming with the same filename. Please, site admins of the world, it's not THAT hard to come up with separate filenames for each of your scenes!

Another negative aspect is the infrequent update history. Sometimes, there is a new update every day (sometimes even two, according to the history), sometimes, there is a 1 week gap between two updates. I know, quality over quantity and everything, but I still prefer a fixed update schedule.

The servers seem to be quite stable. I downloaded a couple of videos and always had my full cable bandwidth available.

Bottom line:
This is a promising site! If they manage to get a bit larger and keep up the standards, I'll certainly come back. If you are into the casting scenario thing and like your girls fresh and natural, give it a try.

12-07-12  01:14pm

Replies (4)
Comment
27
Visit Gay Violations

Gay Violations
(0)

Such a bizarre site - almost anti-porn!

I cannot understand, based on their own preview section, how this site managed to get a decent score from TBP.

I get that it's about public humiliation, which is a genre I usually love and is sadly lacking in gay porn, but this is almost anti-gay-sex!

From the preview it seems a lot of the "action" in these videos actually involved the camera guy catching some guys having sex, then running out to show them they're being filmed - so they quit having sex and run off!

How exactly is this porn? A guy with a camera ruining a sex scene just as you're enjoying it?

Weirdest site I ever did see!

11-14-12  02:23pm

Replies (2)
Comment
28
Visit Porn Pros Network

Porn Pros Network
(0)

Pricing for longer term membership is poor.

With PU discount, you can get a $17.95/month membership, recurring.

But if you choose a longer term membership, you will pay a higher monthly price:
They offer a 3 month membership for $0.65/day, which works out to $19.50/month.

So not only would you be locked into a 3 month term, instead of a 1 month term, but you would be paying a higher monthly fee as well.

11-03-12  08:42pm

Replies (0)
Comment
29
Visit Pure Mature

Pure Mature
(0)

Not much different from the rest

Looking at the preview area, I got the impression that the site was exceptional. Yes, I am familiar with the major players like Brazzers, RealityKings, Bangbros, DDF, 21Sextury, etc. PureMature had this aura of sensuality and passion in stark contrast with the fake cries of "yeah fuck me with that huge cock" and anal piledriving that seems to fill said major players' sites.

Most of the movies' large thumbnails showed what I would call "true POV". Not that commonly referred to "POV" where a single guy does everything including holding the camera, that would be the POV of your eyes if they were coming out of the navel - that is just some dick and face closeups. No, these movies thumbnails show the whole of the girl's body, legs spread, taken at the level of the head or higher, which gives an impression of intimacy. This, and the beautiful sweet lighting.

Unfortunately the actual movies are a letdown. First the quality. The HD formats include:
* MPG 1280x720 2600Kbps, yes, actual MPEG (MPEG-PS) video streams
* MPG 1920x1080 10Mbps MPEG
* WMV 1920x1080 9Mbps VC-1
The industry has moved to AVC in .MP4 container, MPEG is way too inefficient. The MPGs at a higher bitrate and and 15% larger size show more artifacts and less definition than the WMVs. But since the movies seem to use a lot of white natural light, even the latter at 9 Mbps don't show enough definition. Video quality is definitely much worse than that on the major sites listed earlier.

Now the contents. Well, the thumbnails were misleading. The camera work is the same as everywhere else. Positioned somewhere randomly on the side, or long face and boobs closeups, or the navel POV (dick and face closeups). The "true POV" shown in thumbnails is of the accidental kind that lasts a couple of seconds when the camera is moving, like everywhere else. The thumbnails are way more exciting than the movies themselves. So they know which shooting angles to use to entice people, yet fail to use said angles in the movies? (They even photoshopped out Tanya Tate's ugly belly tramp stamp on the thumbnail, I thought she finally did something to look like the classy woman she would have looked like without.)

So the only thing that sets the movie contents apart from that on the other sites is the lack of "fuck me!" cries. Only the guy from cougarsinheat.com had enough patience to stay for more than 5 seconds on the same spot (too bad the site is dead), the rest are just ADD afflicted guys randomly moving the camera, and puremature.com is no exception.

I felt the same way when I subscribed to orgasms.xxx expecting to see... wait for it... don't laugh... female orgasms :).

10-15-12  11:00pm

Replies (4)
Review
30
Visit Mobile Pornpros

Mobile Pornpros
(0)

87.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: a Great selection of Movies in all formats to download and to play
MP3 mpg wmv
all sorts of tasts
a good network meaning you can find what you want..
Cons: i went for the trail to see how it was
didnt want to go any more on so cancelled it
was offered the site at a reduced rate of 6.95
compaired to the £25.95 (cheaper in US$)
and they charged my CREDIT CARD £25.95
now fighting with the company to get my money back

VENDO the MONEY side AVOID
Bottom Line: Great site .. sham about the STEALING of MONEY

10-10-12  04:42am

Replies (1)
Review
31
Visit Passion HD

Passion HD
(2)

68.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Videos are available in a variety of formats including HD. Models are generally very attractive. A few well known models.
Cons: The advertising seems a little deceptive. There are only about 120 videos on the site, with Videos dating back only to November of 2011. That would be 1-3 videos a week since inception. Videos rarely depict the same imagery as the teaser images they are linked to (in any quantity at least..10 minute video, 5 seconds of a particular angle or shot and that's what they tease you with.).
Bottom Line: Nope, sorry. Stay away from this one until it gets a LOT more content and they tweak the formule a bit. The advertising showing slick scenes, awesome couples or groups and amazing "first person" angles does not really reflect what is on the site.

This site includes some Porn Pro-like footage with the objective of selling it in more of an X-Art.com format. It almost works, but very, very little of the material is...artsy enough to pull it off and only a few of the participants look like they are enjoying themselves or their partners. Look at the images depicting the scenes and you think holy crap this is going to be hot! What you get when you watch are a lot of OK, moderaately dissapointing sex scenes in very similar bright white settings with entirely too much footage from the same angle (across the bed on the side). It is almost clinical! Several of the videos look like they take place in the same rented villa in Arizona or California someplace. When there are several videos of the same girl, they are all pretty clearly from the same day no matter how hard they try to change things up. And much of the sex, which should be OMG hot, ends up looking like acting...mediocre acting...not that the industry has any really great acting, but the couples should at least be into each other.

There are a few models you would recognize; Zoey and Jessie, for example. I have NEVER seen Jessie or Zoey, two young, vibrant, energetic and attractive models, not entirely enjoying themselves...except here. Here the sex looks like work. (Jessie has a scene where 90% of the time she is getting screwed on a piano bench with her head slamming against a baby grand piano. That So did not look comfortable or fun!)

I rarely find a site that I can't recommend. Unfortunately, I can't recommend this one.

09-18-12  08:32pm

Replies (2)
Comment
32
Visit Porn Pros Network

Porn Pros Network
(0)

Culioneros

Is Culioneros on this network?

09-15-12  06:49am

Replies (2)
Comment
33
Visit Porn Pros Network

Porn Pros Network
(0)

Anyone know If Pure Mature is on the network

Just wondered if a current member could tell me if Pure Mature is on this network.

Looks like it could be an OK site, like the preview of Veronica Avluv on this site.

08-31-12  09:35am

Replies (4)
Comment
34
Visit Deep Throat Love

Deep Throat Love
(0)

Glad I keep those downloads

Seems like she stopped after her kids got older (I hope there were no awkward moments there). Anyway I keep a lot of the stuff from when I was a member (on CDs!)

Low video quality (by today's standards) but really hot stuff.

Anyone know if they every re-encoded the back log?

07-31-12  08:20am

Replies (0)
Comment
35
Visit Pure Mature

Pure Mature
(0)

Nice idea, shame about the silicone

Taking a look at the samples on this site, it seems like a great idea - the X-Art/Joymii etc formula of well-shot, sensitive hardcore, but featuring slightly older models - I tend to find girls in their 30s very attractive.

Just a shame that many of them seem to have fake boobs... I know many here agree with me, but we seem to be in the minority in the industry!

07-23-12  02:27am

Replies (3)
Review
36
Visit Real Ex Girlfriends

Real Ex Girlfriends
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Around 265 scenes available as mpg mp4 and wmv The more recent stuff it at around 1280x720, while older scenes are sadly at around 600x400 .
- Frequent updates, this seems to be one of the most updated sites in the Porn Pros network right now with at least one update per week and 6 updates during the month of May.
- Photos available for each scene in zip files (around 1500x800 for the more recent scenes and around 200 images per set, the older stuff is around 800x600 and more like 170 per set)
- Very fast downloads (regularly maxed my internet connection while using Downloadthemall for firefox)
- Access to the entire porn pros network which has a lot of similar content (several of the girls have scenes on other sites like disgraced18)
- Almost all the models are incredibly hot porn stars, big boobs, cute faces, lots of make-up and sexy lingerie.
- A lot of the scenes are focused on long POV blow jobs with some great close-ups. Not many wide angles.
Cons: Porn pros has been around for a while and is a major network with a lot of positive stuff and cons which are mostly subjective stuff. For example none of the girls here are actually amateurs or unknown girls (almost all have at least another video on the network) For some people that's a deal breaker, for me it doesn't really matter that much. Anyhow, the following cons are some minor stuff that could be improved in my opinion

- Some older videos are not lit very well and a sever of the older POV scenes are filmed with a shaky hand-held.
- Streaming while fine most of the time can be a bit slow if you're downloading a video already.
- Navigation is a bit clumsy at time, although all the major tag searches, model pages and the basics are there, somehow the site is not 100% user friendly, it just takes a bit of getting used to.
- The photos could be a bit better several images were blurry or showing the girl from a very unflattering angle (half closed eyes etc.)
Bottom Line: Porn pros is a huge network with tons and tons of content. Even though several of their sites don't update anymore they still have enough videos here to keep you busy for quite a while. Real ex-girlfriends, Disgraced 18, Cumshot surprise and 18 year olds are some of the site that still update frequently and the content here is still high quality classic porn.

I say classic porn because the girls look a lot like old fashioned porn stars, big boobs, make up, high heels and corsets, the whole nine yards. Also the action is not fetish stuff or rough, nasty sex with crazy DP, anal or insane deep throating, here you get just regular vagina, bj sex that reminds one of the early 2000 porn boom. Which is great if that's what you're looking for.

The scenes are roughly divided into POV shots where the "girlfriend" has a surprise birthday party for the guy or just got out of the shower or she gets caught looking for a vibrator. Some quick 5 minute set-up followed by a quick strip show and a long POV blow job scene, sex and facial or creampie.

These are mostly the older videos on the site and some are in lower resolution and a bit darker, but in most of these videos the BJ shots are really hot and well done. There is minimal talking, no interviews, no talking during the sex, and pretty long action (most older scenes are over 30 minutes but some go as long as 60 minutes)

On the other hand a lot of the more recent scenes on the site are shot from a somewhat wider angle, no talking whatsoever, the girl and guy just walk in and have sex. These scenes tend to be a bit shorter, usually around 20 min, but are available in higher resolution, good light and a mix of wider angles and close-ups. Also there is no real set-up and very little stripping. The scenes usually start as the guy walks in and starts giving head to the girl, with some very good close ups of the action. Some of the best guy giving oral to a girl I've seen in a while, mostly because they often manage to get her face as well as the action in the same shot.

Of course there are some scenes that don't really fall in either category, but the point here is that there is a lot of variation and with several settings (kitchen, several hotel rooms, even one or two outdoor scenes) you won't get bored quickly. They even have a scene( Tiffany Brookes I believe) where she is getting fucked on a glass balcony of sorts and several minutes of the action are shot from underneath, really interesting and different stuff.

Overall the content doesn't get stale and between the great looking girls, the different angles and settings the site is a great deal.

One of the biggest downsides for me was that the navigation is functional, but a bit clumsy. For example you can't really see the most popular scenes on just one site, it will show you the most popular scenes on the entire network. There are tags and categories, but again they work for the entire network so I can't really see all scenes tagged "big tits" on real ex girlfriends, I get too see the scenes tagged like that on the entire network. Then again all the girls here have big tits so no big loss :)

Another somewhat strange trend is that fact that some scenes are labeled MILF when the girls clearly look young, or amateur when the girls are clearly no amateurs. Speaking of which, there is at least one scene where they show a 1 minute interview with the girl where she is asked if her agent informed her why she's there today "to have sex, duh!" she answers, then they try to pretend the whole video is an amateur scene shot by a jealous boyfriend because she cheated on him or something like that...a bit of mixed messages here.

Anyhow, don't expect the girls from backroomcastingcouch or woodmancasting to show up here.

But these are mostly subjective complaints and if you like porn stars, classic sex in some fun and different locations/ outfits (do you want to see a girl wear her ugg boots through the entire shoot?) This site will be a nice compilation of videos. Add in the massive network and I wholeheartedly recommend this to anyone that's never tried it before, but don't expect very niche material, this is all pretty much mainstream porn here.

06-03-12  12:22pm

Replies (0)
Comment
37
Visit Jurassic Cock

Jurassic Cock
(0)

Site no longer seems to update

Joined Pornpros again this month (May 2012) and the last video on this particular site was uploaded in December last year. It's really a shame since the quality or the girls is high and this is one of the few porn pros sites that has anal scenes.

The network seems to have sporadic updates here and there, but overall they seem to have hit a rough patch, just fyi.

05-14-12  07:49pm

Replies (0)
Comment
38
Visit Porn Pros Network

Porn Pros Network
(0)

Photo sets don't always contain photos

One of the things I used to really like about this network were the great quality photo sets that accompanied each video. Not only were they very high quality but also well lit and framed and obviously taken by someone who knows what they are doing. Unfortunately since the style of the scenes switched from colourful to arty farty, the quality of the photos has bombed. Most of the sets contain a few low quality candid shots and then 500 or so screen caps. The screen caps are totally pointless as I can see the same as in the video and the candid shots are awful and amateur. Please get the photographer back!

05-14-12  07:05am

Replies (1)
Comment
39
Visit Disgraced 18

Disgraced 18
(0)

Recycling (and not in a good way)

In the last 5 months or so there have been 16 updates. Of those 16 updates only 6 are actually new material, the other 10 are recycled from older content, mostly from 2010. This network has been doing this for quite a while now but on most other sites you would get about 80% new vs 20% recycled. Its a lot worse here which is a shame as this was one of my favourites on the network.

04-27-12  07:07am

Replies (5)
Comment
40
Visit Deep Throat Love

Deep Throat Love
(0)

DTL is a lie.

If the previews on Deep Throat Love are any indication, they have switched the throat area for current models. It seems to show more intercourse than throat loving.

I find this very disheartening and disappointing to discover and it by no means encourages me to rejoin.

I am just curious if this genre is falling out of favor or are we just waiting for the next great throat to emerge? Two that I just discovered in the last four months (Jamey Janes & Elli Fox) have been gone from the business since last year.

gripe gripe - what can I say?

04-17-12  03:52pm

Replies (6)
Review
41
Visit Massage Creep

Massage Creep
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Updating more or less regularly like all the main attractions at Porn Pros Network with 96 current scenes
-Scenes and girls are both really hot in very erotic but still hardcore way, especially the new Passion HD style ones
-Unique topic like most sites here have although I've noticed that there are others in massage niche too
-Relatively good quality of video. The oldest scenes are from late 2009 and already 720p
-Oil in many scenes. The only thing that really makes massage genre in my opinion
-Working POV content
-As spouse/girlfriend friendly as it gets. Although she might end up wanting a massage instead of what you were suggesting ;)
Cons: -In some scenes warmup/massage might take a bit too long for ones tastes. There are however other sites on this network for more immediate action
-General Porn Pros cons apply here too. No really relevant search engine, browsing is the way to find scenes. No indication of video resolution next to download buttons. 1080p missing. Mediocre photography. No big deals though
-If you were looking for anal, this is about last site to find it on this network. I've spotted one scene which is a very hot one with Anissa Kate, by the way
-Some unneeded editing in newer scenes where clothes or towels just "disappear"
Bottom Line: This site like most of the others on Porn Pros Network falls into a very specific niche which here is massage. Specifically guys massaging girls with oil in situations that start out usually as rather innocent (if naked) massage with the guys hands slowly creeping (I guess hence the name) into more and more private parts and eventual sex. Sometimes the massage takes longer, sometimes the girls is supposedly so horny that the sex starts quite soon and sometimes there's even kissing/fondling before the massage part. There's also the odd scene with the male actor receiving the massage.

They've got a very nice selection of models on these 96 scenes with little or no repetition so every scene offers something fresh (if not in theme). Models are young and hot and while this site has no teen theme, there are no wannabe MILF's here eihter.

I cannot really comment well on the credibility of the scenes on this site if someone is particularly into the supposed reality aspect of what's going on. Being no real fan of body massage, I have no idea if the guys are doing the real thing. However it looks hot, there is lots of oil involved and that's all I need to enjoy from this site.

As I've mentioned on my reviews of Porn Pros Network and Disgraced18, the whole network is now updating with scenes from their site that one has to subsribe to separately, Passion HD, and this is where those scenes really shine. On many sites they have a feeling of being bit out of place since the action is nowhere near as goofy or strange as one might be used to on those sites. Here however they are the best of the whole bunch. Better lit, girls looking better, every bit of action is very faithful to the site's niche with added touch of class. There's roughly 10 of those newer scenes at the moment but I certainly hope to see more.

Technically there's not much to be said that I already didn't give overview when reviewing Porn Pros Network. All works acceptably even if the site design and search function could use little work.

I can imagine this is one of the main reasons to join this network for those who are not into the trademark stuff of colorful bondage and joke sites. Luckily this one seems to get even better. Normally I'm into bit rougher stuff but this is so well excecuted that I cannot help returning to these scenes.

04-13-12  06:30am

Replies (2)
Review
42
Visit Carmen Cocks

Carmen Cocks
(0)

69.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Carmen is super-hot with a great body
- Good balance of photos and videos
- Nice mix of content, mainly blowjobs and sex
- Two good bonus sites which you'll love if you like Carmen
- Everything is downloadable with no apparent restrictions
Cons: - Trial is limited to just photos (no videos)
- Site is no longer updating
- 'HD' videos aren't HD
- Navigation is pretty basic, not a huge problem because...
- ...Not much content relatively speaking
- Bonus sites also not updating
- No ZIPs of photos, and pics aren't huge
Bottom Line: Carmen looks incredible, but the site is dead and honestly, there's not much to it. It's definitely frozen in time in most respects - quality of content, size of member's area etc.

The preview area claims that she 'posts new HD videos every week' which is a false claim in two respects; the videos aren't HD, and the website is no longer updating.

There's a one-day trial available for $0.95 which is what I chose, and despite what dubya says in his review, it is no longer full access and limits you to just the photo galleries. Clicking onto the video pages will prompt you to upgrade your membership.

To do so is pretty easy, and within 30 minutes, you have full access to Carmen's site.

The two main sections once in the member's area are Pictures and Movies.

There's also links to: Personal Email, Forum (not posted in since 2010), Store (just a link to vivid.com), Friends (just links to Melissa Midwest and Sweet Adri) and Bonus Content.

Bonus Content includes links to feeds/content from: Black on White Adventures, Creampie Virgin, Day in the Hood, Lesbian Hookups, Milf Banged, Parties Exposed, Throat Banged, Munch My Ass, Perfect Round Asses, My Favourite Hand Job, Nice Round Boobs and Booty Like That - frankly, all pretty trashy in my opinion.

Pictures:

There are 54 galleries, all navigatable from one page with a thumbnail preview for each (and no description).

The pictures are decent quality, normally cataloguing a sex scene, masturbation scene, lesbian posing or a blowjob. Some start off candid style photos of her at an arcade or something, before cutting to a BJ/sex scene etc later with her in the same outfit.

Pictures are 1161 pixels on their longest side and have a medium-sized (about 300x50px) watermark. The quality of photos seems consistent throughout the size.

The galleries are all decent sized, ranging from 100 to (in some cases) over 400 images. Unfortunately there's no ZIP downloads available.

Movies:

The navigation page for movies is identical to the gallery page in that exactly the same thumbnails are used for the 54 movies available from her site.

The thumbnails are obviously images from the galleries, so although the content is roughly the same, don't rely on that 'money shot' necessarily being part of the video. Likewise, some thumbnails imply the video will be a candid style video but are just a solo video etc of her in the same outfit as in the thumbnail. It's not a huge deal, but it's a bit annoying sometimes to download a video you're not expecting.

All videos are WMV format. There's no way to preview prior to downloading, and all videos are 448x252 pixels in size. The quality is not too bad, and the content is much the same as the photos. She's a pretty good performer, and great to watch.

Bonus Sites:

You also get full membership to Hailey Hardcore and Candy Skye. If you like Carmen, you will like both of these sites too, particularly Hailey Hardcore who's basically a brunette version of Carmen.

Bottom Line:

Overall it's not a bad site so long as you know what you're getting for your money. The content is basic, there are no updates, but Carmen is *hot as*, and Hailey Hardcore is definitely a huge bonus and equally as hot as Carmen.

04-12-12  12:38pm

Replies (3)
Comment
43
Visit Porn Pros Network

Porn Pros Network
(0)

Did I say the content varies a lot?

As if to make my point after commenting about the classy stuff added lately to contrast the goofy stuff before, they released yesterday the most absurdly horrible scene I've ever seen. The girl namedd Jennifer White who starred in really nice anal scene on Real Ex Girlfriends not too long ago (one of those Passion HD scenes) is seen here on site Amateur Violations with her colon protruding for 10cm or so outside her rectum with some guy poking it with his cock, cumming on it and another girl licking it.

Subscribers check it out if you dare (I guess you can take a peek in previews section too). This is quite beyond any gaping and prolapsing I've ever seen and my feelings are mixed to put it lightly. The subscribers' on site comments are hilarious ;)

04-10-12  10:21am

Replies (1)
Review
44
Visit Disgraced 18

Disgraced 18
(0)

88.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -120 scenes with more or less frequent updates every week or every two weeks
-New updates include very classy stuff from the Passion HD style of production. Nice ladies in white bright light and clothes
-Really unique stuff. Wacky bondage with bright colored tape, ropes, ball gags, toys and other stuff. Luckily they haven't decided to use too much childish props either. Creative use of all kinds of stuff in bondage from shopping carts to garden chairs
-A good selection of hot young models without using the same ones over and over. International big names but also ones I've never heard of
-Almost all the videos are in quite nice quality, close to 720p in MPG format
-Good download speeds, fast working web site
Cons: -New updates include very classy stuff from the Passion HD style of production. If you were a fan of their former very unique content, this material in shades of white with bondage limited to handcuffs may not really be what you wanted
-Only a scene or two with anal action
-Occassionally the goofiness just goes a little too far. A girl with a bunch of sausages taped into her mouth? A girl covered with spray serpentine?
-Bondage is sometimes really half assed with the girl almost holding up the stuff that is supposedly holding her
-Video quality can get pixelated at times even in a clip that looks good most of the time
Bottom Line: One of the more active sites on Porn Pros Network and for me one of their main attractions. Yet another part of the network that probably divides opinions strongly so all the ratings are quite subjective I guess.

The topic is sex in bondage with teen niche added on top of it and the whole thing is given a strange twist that results in quite wacky brightly colored combination of (probably) unintended humor and hot sex. Basic recipe is a girl getting interviewed and then bound with ropes, bars, gags, colorful ropes, tape and so on and had sex with. Often there is additional colorful stuff mixed in like spray serpentine, laundry pins etc. for often quite messy results. Lot of action with toys also, ranging from dildoes to nipple clamps and different kinds of pumps.

With only a handful of exceptions, the scenes are one on one and the sex the regular vaginal variant. Irritatingly there are also some helping hands (not to mention the camera mans hands on the girl) visible on the background at the times with little or no editing done to remove those. The bondage is quite light in contrast to sites like ones offered by Kink.com and often it actually appears that the girls are struggling to support the stuff they are bound to. Personally I like it the other way but it's excuseable on the site that isn't apparently taking itself too seriously.

Technical side of the things is exactly like on any other site on Porn Pros Network. Like on many networks these days, the sites are just another category filter inside a unified website. Searching and filtering content inside this site alone makes not much sense since browsing through 120 scenes is quite quickly done so the search functions do not really matter within a sub site. Video is available mostly in HD that is close to or exactly 720p. 1080p advertised on the site header is apparently somewhere else and not here. The formats are offered without info about quality so it's a bit of a hit or miss until you find out what you like. For me it's MPG but some say WMV is less pixelated. Photos aren't really a focus of this site and I quickly forgot about them.

The network also offers two other quite similar sites which I don't really see point in giving a separate reviews. Squirt Disgrace could be probably combined with this site without too many noticing, having only 15 scenes and last updating 2009. The content is basically the same kind with the difference that the girls squirt during the scenes. MILF Humiliation has 42 scenes of similar action with slightly older ladies and hasn't seen new additions since 2010. The scenes are somewhat harder with anal sex included every now and then and not quite that much bright colors but the general messing around with household items and gardening tools is there. All fun sites if you can enjoy this kind of stuff.

Bondage with sex isn't still very well presented in pay site scene and I don't really know why. Many old big names are still pushing material for DVD releases and I wonder if they really can sell them. These sites offer a one take on the topic and while it's probably nothing for real hard core enthuaiasts, I say they certainly help fill the gap and I'm happy that they are putting out their own unique take on this niche.

Your mileage may vary, as they say. If the subject does not interest you and the wackiness puts you off, this site may totally suck in your opinion. If you are not that serious about little messing around and find bondage and models hot, it's a rare gem.

04-09-12  07:33am

Replies (0)
Review
45
Visit Porn Pros Network

Porn Pros Network
(0)

91.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Large number of subsites with various niches and themes that are hard to find elsewhere
-These guys understand that most of the guys want to see more girls than other guys. The scenes are often packed with both genders but usually there seems to be more girls around
-Quite nice image quality in most of the videos. Especially the new Passion HD content is very nice. Up to roughly 720p in MPEG and WMV
-Large archive of scenes for quite decent price
-Models are almost always really hot on their major sites
-MassageCreep, Disgraced18, MilfHumiliation, TeenBFF, CrueltyParty and even CumshotSurprise and CumDisgrace are innovative and cool sites with uique content. Sometimes too unique ;)
-Technically works well, good download speeds with DL manager running up to four simultaneous downloads at 10+ megabytes per second
Cons: -Site navigation is quite awkward. Search doesn't really help and tag words are way too common and often mistaken. What good is tag "Ass" that 99% of scenes have?
-Not much for fans of photography. What they call high quality image sets are to me like low res screen caps
-Video options are unclear. You can usually choose MPEG, MP4 or WMV but there is no indication what resolution they are. Generally it appears that MP4 is the smallest one in image size and MPEG and WMV are the same while 1080p promised on the site is missing altogether
-Some kind of regional pricing. You get the actual price when you are to give the cc info, until that you are shown the USD price that is lower. I made a mental note to always check these things to the very end with a fake email address
-Some joke sites with plastic fake cocks and bucket loads of fake cum are quite ridiculous
-Scenes could use better preview images
-Relatively few anal scenes
Bottom Line: Well, this one is a mixed bag for sure. It has everything from boyfriend/girlfriend like gentle scenes to not-quite-milfs being bound to household appliances with colorful paper serpentine to ridiculously huge plastic dongs spraying fake cum all over groups of oiled ladies. Something for everyone I'd say as long as you are not looking for strictly girl/girl scenes or solo content. The production varies from overly goofy and ridiculous to the very smooth low sunlight lit scenes in different shades of white clothing and props.

Examples of the goofy side are Disgraced18 which stages younger ladies in scenes where they are loosely bound in ropes and cuffs in all the shades of rainbow and had sex with. MilfHumiliation which is almost like the aforementioned but the ladies vary from what I guess are teen mothers to older cougars. CockCompetition is a kind of a wheel of fortune game show where a guy with diamond studded teeth fucks competitors with half a meter long plastic dong. CumDisgrace is bondage gang banging with fake cum and a strange looking muscular guy wanking off on the background. CumshotSurprise is quite regular group sex with fake cumshots in the beginning and end.

On the classier side they have sites like MassageCreep which features massage scenes turned eventually into sex. TeenBFF has scenes which start out as lesbian action with a "boyfriend" joining in later. CrueltyParty is supposedly group of firls dominating one guy, a male stripper or whatever but with the exception of first few scenes is quite tame. 18YearsOld is quite regular one on one action.

In addition to the regular content of their sites, they have also added scenes from site Passion HD. Those are more X-Art kind of scenes with soft focus, low light, white clothes and slightly dreamy overall feeling. These scenes are very high quality in my opinion, feature hot ladies and are a nice distraction from general content on the site. The only problem is that they do not always quite match the theme of the sub site where they are placed. For example they don't have much disgracing when placed on Disgraced18 and on the CrueltyParty they lack the femdom theme.

Everyone doesn't necessarily agree with me but I could use more anal action on this whole network. There are many models on these scenes who are almost known for their performance on that aspect so let's have it all! Other minor nitpickings include photographers and other crew seen in background and corners of picture on sites like CrueltyParty etc. Nothing too bad production wise as long as one likes the theme of the content.

Technical side is a bit mixed case as well. Video is quite good when it is good but older scenes and indoor ones can be quite grainy and pixelated. Photo sets are just a side thought in my opinion, this is clearly a video site. Downloads work fast and videos are easy to dl once you figure out which version you want and find the scenes you like. The only effective way I found is to manually browse the site based on subsites and video download options have no indication of resolution. The 1080p promised on the header of the site seems to be missing.

The site updates roughly once a day with new material or remastered old scenes. While this is slightly slower than some of the most active sites, the rate is still perfectly acceptable.

As a bottom line, this site is certainly worth a subscription every now and then, especialy now that the new Passion HD content is being added. Backlog is decent, not huge like on some sites so it may not entertain for prolonged periods but is certainly worth going through. Somewhat clearer site design with better search and tagging might help as well as the advertised 1080p although the resolution itself doesn't always add to anything but file size.

04-06-12  03:50am

Replies (6)
Comment
46
Visit Porn Pros Network

Porn Pros Network
(0)

1080p?

Proudly announced on the site but nowhere to be found? Or is it just me not knowing where to look?

Options are bit confusing anyway. There's MPG, MP4 and WMV HD which all have word "High" in the file name. However it appears that MPG and WMV are roughly 720p and MP4 is smaller but so far I haven't come across any 1080p.

In any case I would recommend MPG. Higher resolution than MP4 and looks much better than WMV without too large difference in file size.

03-31-12  12:05am

Replies (2)
Comment
47
Visit Porn Pros Network

Porn Pros Network
(0)

Interesting new style

This network has taken a new style of scenes all over it's main sites. Disgraced 18, Cruelty Party and Teen BFF among others has been lately updates with very artsy or classy looking scenes with lots of white clothes, curtains, sheets etc. and low rising sun kind of light. These scenes feature very fine models that look kind of pure instead of the normal goofy or slutty on these sites. Reminds me kind of X-Art and similar sites. Very refreshing and hot in erotic but still hardcore way!

03-22-12  04:12am

Replies (3)
Comment
48
Visit Porn Pros Network

Porn Pros Network
(0)

Seriously Shady

I'm still getting emails from them after unsubscribing from them two years ago. From the looks of it they've completely changed everything in their site, but refuse to stop sending me their junk emails.

Too fucking bad about it. The site has some of great scenes and the new material makes it even better...

but FUCK THIS! I CAN'T TRUST THEM. Maybe they sell DVDs.

03-04-12  03:14pm

Replies (9)
Comment
49
Visit Deep Throat Love

Deep Throat Love
(0)

Recyling old material

DTL is now into recycling old material, albeit it's better material than their current content. Too much of their current content is with models who have intercourse more than they give Deepthroat Love. Going from one of the better blow job sites to a very second rate one these days.

02-11-12  10:33am

Replies (1)
Comment
50
Visit Passion HD

Passion HD
(2)

passion-hd

This site updates very infrequently inspite of saying 3 updates a week. Nor do they respond to enquiries/comments etc.

More than that the videos are poorly edited.

01-19-12  07:07am

Replies (5)

Shown : 26-50 of 144 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.18 seconds.