| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
26
|
Porn Pros Network
(3)
|
|
04-10-12 10:21am
Replies (1)
|
Review
27
|
Disgraced 18
(1)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-120 scenes with more or less frequent updates every week or every two weeks
-New updates include very classy stuff from the Passion HD style of production. Nice ladies in white bright light and clothes
-Really unique stuff. Wacky bondage with bright colored tape, ropes, ball gags, toys and other stuff. Luckily they haven't decided to use too much childish props either. Creative use of all kinds of stuff in bondage from shopping carts to garden chairs
-A good selection of hot young models without using the same ones over and over. International big names but also ones I've never heard of
-Almost all the videos are in quite nice quality, close to 720p in MPG format
-Good download speeds, fast working web site |
| Cons: |
-New updates include very classy stuff from the Passion HD style of production. If you were a fan of their former very unique content, this material in shades of white with bondage limited to handcuffs may not really be what you wanted
-Only a scene or two with anal action
-Occassionally the goofiness just goes a little too far. A girl with a bunch of sausages taped into her mouth? A girl covered with spray serpentine?
-Bondage is sometimes really half assed with the girl almost holding up the stuff that is supposedly holding her
-Video quality can get pixelated at times even in a clip that looks good most of the time |
| Bottom Line: |
One of the more active sites on Porn Pros Network and for me one of their main attractions. Yet another part of the network that probably divides opinions strongly so all the ratings are quite subjective I guess.
The topic is sex in bondage with teen niche added on top of it and the whole thing is given a strange twist that results in quite wacky brightly colored combination of (probably) unintended humor and hot sex. Basic recipe is a girl getting interviewed and then bound with ropes, bars, gags, colorful ropes, tape and so on and had sex with. Often there is additional colorful stuff mixed in like spray serpentine, laundry pins etc. for often quite messy results. Lot of action with toys also, ranging from dildoes to nipple clamps and different kinds of pumps.
With only a handful of exceptions, the scenes are one on one and the sex the regular vaginal variant. Irritatingly there are also some helping hands (not to mention the camera mans hands on the girl) visible on the background at the times with little or no editing done to remove those. The bondage is quite light in contrast to sites like ones offered by Kink.com and often it actually appears that the girls are struggling to support the stuff they are bound to. Personally I like it the other way but it's excuseable on the site that isn't apparently taking itself too seriously.
Technical side of the things is exactly like on any other site on Porn Pros Network. Like on many networks these days, the sites are just another category filter inside a unified website. Searching and filtering content inside this site alone makes not much sense since browsing through 120 scenes is quite quickly done so the search functions do not really matter within a sub site. Video is available mostly in HD that is close to or exactly 720p. 1080p advertised on the site header is apparently somewhere else and not here. The formats are offered without info about quality so it's a bit of a hit or miss until you find out what you like. For me it's MPG but some say WMV is less pixelated. Photos aren't really a focus of this site and I quickly forgot about them.
The network also offers two other quite similar sites which I don't really see point in giving a separate reviews. Squirt Disgrace could be probably combined with this site without too many noticing, having only 15 scenes and last updating 2009. The content is basically the same kind with the difference that the girls squirt during the scenes. MILF Humiliation has 42 scenes of similar action with slightly older ladies and hasn't seen new additions since 2010. The scenes are somewhat harder with anal sex included every now and then and not quite that much bright colors but the general messing around with household items and gardening tools is there. All fun sites if you can enjoy this kind of stuff.
Bondage with sex isn't still very well presented in pay site scene and I don't really know why. Many old big names are still pushing material for DVD releases and I wonder if they really can sell them. These sites offer a one take on the topic and while it's probably nothing for real hard core enthuaiasts, I say they certainly help fill the gap and I'm happy that they are putting out their own unique take on this niche.
Your mileage may vary, as they say. If the subject does not interest you and the wackiness puts you off, this site may totally suck in your opinion. If you are not that serious about little messing around and find bondage and models hot, it's a rare gem. |
|
04-09-12 07:33am
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
Porn Pros Network
(3)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Large number of subsites with various niches and themes that are hard to find elsewhere
-These guys understand that most of the guys want to see more girls than other guys. The scenes are often packed with both genders but usually there seems to be more girls around
-Quite nice image quality in most of the videos. Especially the new Passion HD content is very nice. Up to roughly 720p in MPEG and WMV
-Large archive of scenes for quite decent price
-Models are almost always really hot on their major sites
-MassageCreep, Disgraced18, MilfHumiliation, TeenBFF, CrueltyParty and even CumshotSurprise and CumDisgrace are innovative and cool sites with uique content. Sometimes too unique ;)
-Technically works well, good download speeds with DL manager running up to four simultaneous downloads at 10+ megabytes per second |
| Cons: |
-Site navigation is quite awkward. Search doesn't really help and tag words are way too common and often mistaken. What good is tag "Ass" that 99% of scenes have?
-Not much for fans of photography. What they call high quality image sets are to me like low res screen caps
-Video options are unclear. You can usually choose MPEG, MP4 or WMV but there is no indication what resolution they are. Generally it appears that MP4 is the smallest one in image size and MPEG and WMV are the same while 1080p promised on the site is missing altogether
-Some kind of regional pricing. You get the actual price when you are to give the cc info, until that you are shown the USD price that is lower. I made a mental note to always check these things to the very end with a fake email address
-Some joke sites with plastic fake cocks and bucket loads of fake cum are quite ridiculous
-Scenes could use better preview images
-Relatively few anal scenes |
| Bottom Line: |
Well, this one is a mixed bag for sure. It has everything from boyfriend/girlfriend like gentle scenes to not-quite-milfs being bound to household appliances with colorful paper serpentine to ridiculously huge plastic dongs spraying fake cum all over groups of oiled ladies. Something for everyone I'd say as long as you are not looking for strictly girl/girl scenes or solo content. The production varies from overly goofy and ridiculous to the very smooth low sunlight lit scenes in different shades of white clothing and props.
Examples of the goofy side are Disgraced18 which stages younger ladies in scenes where they are loosely bound in ropes and cuffs in all the shades of rainbow and had sex with. MilfHumiliation which is almost like the aforementioned but the ladies vary from what I guess are teen mothers to older cougars. CockCompetition is a kind of a wheel of fortune game show where a guy with diamond studded teeth fucks competitors with half a meter long plastic dong. CumDisgrace is bondage gang banging with fake cum and a strange looking muscular guy wanking off on the background. CumshotSurprise is quite regular group sex with fake cumshots in the beginning and end.
On the classier side they have sites like MassageCreep which features massage scenes turned eventually into sex. TeenBFF has scenes which start out as lesbian action with a "boyfriend" joining in later. CrueltyParty is supposedly group of firls dominating one guy, a male stripper or whatever but with the exception of first few scenes is quite tame. 18YearsOld is quite regular one on one action.
In addition to the regular content of their sites, they have also added scenes from site Passion HD. Those are more X-Art kind of scenes with soft focus, low light, white clothes and slightly dreamy overall feeling. These scenes are very high quality in my opinion, feature hot ladies and are a nice distraction from general content on the site. The only problem is that they do not always quite match the theme of the sub site where they are placed. For example they don't have much disgracing when placed on Disgraced18 and on the CrueltyParty they lack the femdom theme.
Everyone doesn't necessarily agree with me but I could use more anal action on this whole network. There are many models on these scenes who are almost known for their performance on that aspect so let's have it all! Other minor nitpickings include photographers and other crew seen in background and corners of picture on sites like CrueltyParty etc. Nothing too bad production wise as long as one likes the theme of the content.
Technical side is a bit mixed case as well. Video is quite good when it is good but older scenes and indoor ones can be quite grainy and pixelated. Photo sets are just a side thought in my opinion, this is clearly a video site. Downloads work fast and videos are easy to dl once you figure out which version you want and find the scenes you like. The only effective way I found is to manually browse the site based on subsites and video download options have no indication of resolution. The 1080p promised on the header of the site seems to be missing.
The site updates roughly once a day with new material or remastered old scenes. While this is slightly slower than some of the most active sites, the rate is still perfectly acceptable.
As a bottom line, this site is certainly worth a subscription every now and then, especialy now that the new Passion HD content is being added. Backlog is decent, not huge like on some sites so it may not entertain for prolonged periods but is certainly worth going through. Somewhat clearer site design with better search and tagging might help as well as the advertised 1080p although the resolution itself doesn't always add to anything but file size. |
|
04-06-12 03:50am
Replies (6)
|
Comment
29
|
Porn Pros Network
(3)
|
|
03-31-12 12:05am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
30
|
Porn Pros Network
(3)
|
|
03-22-12 04:12am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
31
|
Porn Pros Network
(3)
|
|
03-04-12 03:14pm
Replies (9)
|
Comment
32
|
Deep Throat Love
(1)
|
|
02-11-12 10:33am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
33
|
Passion HD
(2)
|
|
01-19-12 07:07am
Replies (5)
|
Comment
34
|
Passion HD
(2)
|
|
01-17-12 11:31am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
35
|
Porn Pros Network
(3)
|
|
01-08-12 09:48am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
36
|
18 Years Old
(0)
|
|
12-16-11 07:19am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
37
|
Squirt Disgrace
(0)
|
|
11-14-11 05:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
38
|
40 oz Bounce
(0)
|
|
11-14-11 05:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
39
|
Webcam Hackers
(1)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Around 50 videos with updates pretty regularly (every 7 days it seems).
- The scenes are supposedly in HD (1250x720), but in my opinion even the HD looks grainy and rather poor quality (I guess it's all part of the webcam look, but to me they took it a step too far with some scenes looking as bad as a live cam strip show)
- As the title suggests this site is all about girls with webcams. Some of them strip in front of said webcam, some get fucked (sadly only one camera angle) and a few masturbate solo.
- They have the same high quality of models the rest of the site has and I believe all "amateurs" on here have scenes on other sites in the network.
- Most scenes have a bit of a story. A girl talks to her boyfriend and strips for him, a foreign exchange student has sex with her boyfriend, etc. Nothing too crazy, but it all stays in the same theme of a webcam hack and it's rather hot.
- Access to the network is included (tons and tons of good sex scenes here.) |
| Cons: |
- Like I mentioned above the videos although good resolution are still a bit on the grainy side and several of them have the webcam specific delay, which really makes the scene hard to get into. Also some scenes have serious color issues (when a girl's vagina looks purple something is seriously wrong)
- Some scenes are very short (5 minutes) and there are some scenes that feel like they belong together in one video but were split into two in order to make the site look bigger. (There is one Madison Ivy scene where she masturbates then another scene where has sex in the exact same place).
- The entire network needs a better way to preview videos. Right now their thumbnails are not very clear.
- Some girls are really not that interesting in solo action. There is one scene where a girl pulls on her labia and asks if we can tell which one she pulls on more. Titillating stuff indeed. |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall this site suffers from some limitations that are inherent in the type of content it's trying to produce. When you're trying to generate amateur content you pretty much force yourself to have rather poor camera work, only one angle and sometimes awkward interactions (like I mentioned above some girls do well alone with a camera and some are just weird)
Also they have a scene where two girls get into adult diapers and pretend to be sumo wrestlers. I guess that fits the site and it's rather funny, but I'm not sure if it's content that I want to pay 25 bucks for. I guess you have to look at this site as a bonus along with the much, much better sites like Massage Creep and 18 Years Old.
Aside from the sometimes questionable content I would have loved longer scenes. The average video is around 10 minutes with many running under that. Give the girls some more toys and more outfits and there should be no issue making longer videos.
So, we have rather poor action, short scenes and bad camerawork. So far the site manages to fail on every count possible. We do have several hot models, but why bother trying to watch the scenes here when a click away they are showing off with good lighting and multiple camera angles?
Now don't get me wrong, the premise of the site is good, we need more amateur content even if amateur means pornstar paid to masturbate in front of an expert camera crew. But for the love of God don't settle with actual webcam footage. That is never going to look good, it's just a waste of time and money.
Bottom line: the latest updates on here show improvement. Maybe it's just my hopeful optimism but the camera work seems cleaner and they are starting to focus on sex scenes as opposed to solo masturbation. Also the u8pdates are coming regularly and they seem to really want to push this amateur-like content, which is great.
More HD updates, more hot models and longer scenes and we should have a great site with a unique premise. (please no more adult diapers though... there is no need for that.)
P.S. The score reflects mu hope that the site will improve, right now I would not join this network just for the violation series of sites. |
|
10-29-11 04:13pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
40
|
Amateur Violations
(1)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Around 48 scenes and they seem to update every 10 days or so.
- Videos are available in multiple formats including HD (1250x700) and smaller formats (640x320 and I believe even 320x). They have streaming, a trailer for the scene as well as HD images (3,000px × 2,000px and zip files available) and screencaps.
- The whole network has some cute, exclusive models and this site in particular has a few hot girls (check out Eve Evans and Lexi bloom)
- The theme of this site (as far as I can tell) is weird amateur-looking stuff that didn't really fit anywhere else. As such you have a scene where a girl is on the phone while getting fucked, a gloryhole scene, a girl with a bag over her head and a scene where the actors get "caught" by an angry parent. Overall I'd rate this site funny, rather than hot. Good for a chuckle and some scenes have a few good POV BJ moments, but overall a bit of a mixed bag. |
| Cons: |
-As mentioned above the site really feels like an odds and ends closet, this doesn't fit anywhere else so let's put it here. This could explain why there are several scenes that seem to have been split up to make it appear as if they have more content updates. Overall there are actually only around 20 or so scenes here.
- They have ads both to live cams and other sites. Install adblock and you should be good to go, otherwise it can be a bit of a pain.
- Several of the scenes are much shorter than described (5 minutes as opposed to 36) I assume if you grabbed both videos for one scene and merged them you'd get the full time length. Anyhow, it feels cheap of them to pad the site like this |
| Bottom Line: |
Don't get me wrong, I love the Pornpros network. Their stuff is consistently both funny and sexy. They somehow manage to get some good looking exclusive girls and they have some great scenes with little funny interviews and stories. However I don't understand why this particular site exists. It feels like a complete hodgepodge of random scenes that don't fit together and for the most part aren't even particularly hot or interesting.
I guess the idea was to have a bunch of amateur scenes with random funny stories behind them. One girl takes revenge on her boyfriend and calls him while getting fucked by another dude. Another girl doesn't realize when the condom breaks and is mad after the dude cums inside her. Two lovers get caught in the act by an angry parent, a gloryhole and a girl who gets a bag over her head.
In theory all these sound kinda funny, maybe interesting, but I fail to see why we need an entire site of such scripted "funny" porn stories. To make things worse many of these stories are broken up into two updates for no apparent reason other than to make it look like they have a lot more updates than they do.
The Pornpros network always had a frat house vibe of "Bro, let me tell you this crazy story while we drink cheap beer and pop our collars." For the most part this doesn't bother me, in fact I enjoy it once in a while (as corny as it is this vibe is much better in my opinion than abusing girls on film and calling that porn) However this site along with the public violations one always felt out of place on a porn site; they are almost more at home on a jackass reality show than on a porn site, in my opinion.
I mean I enjoy a funny story behind my porn, but what is the point of doing an entire scene where the girl has a bag on her face? Or why have a scene that ends up with 3 minutes of the girl spiting the cum in anger and saying it tastes fucking weird? These are funny stories that you'd share with friends not porn you jack off too.
To add to the disappointment most of the scenes look like they were filmed in a very dark room with a cell-phone. The camera work is not nearly as good as most of the network and while I understand that they wanted to go for an "amateur" feel, in the end, when I can barely see a girl's vagina, I just feel cheated. Not to mention that now I suspect several of these scenes are old stuff they ripped from somewhere else and are just recycling. (I hope I am wrong but I am suspicious of some of these older looking grainy films)
Anyhow, once you get past the mixed content there are some nice scenes here. Some of the girls are cute (again, if you join check out Eve Evans)and they do have sex or at least give BJ's. My recommendation is to see if you like a girl and then check out her scenes on the rest of the network since they are always better.
That being said I have to say that in the end this is a very subjective review. Maybe some people really like this kind of funny story porn, I for one just felt confused and disappointed at the poor video quality.
Now please don't judge this whole network based on this review. They have some great content, just check out 18 year olds or disgraced 18 or any of the other great sites they have. This is just a small weird site that I don't think is really reflective of the network as a hole. |
|
10-23-11 07:55pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
41
|
Deep Throat Love
(1)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Around 145 scenes now and updating regularly (almost weekly, although they do miss a week or two here and there). Most scenes come in a range of formats including HD (1250x700) as well as standard sizes and small clips. They also have HD images for each set at 3,000px × 2,000px (zip archives available). Older stuff is of course in lower resolutions, but for the most part stuff looks great.
-Download speeds were incredible at around 1 mb per video. No issues with log-out or missing links or anything like that. Overall the technical aspects of the site work well. However, I do wish they had a way to show all models on this site alone as opposed to models in the entire network.
- The scenes have good camerawork, but they tend to focus a bit too much on close-ups. Good light and hot models.
- Although the site is called Deepthroat love I believe all scenes have some regular sex as well, and we even get some threesomes (not too much anal though)
- Overall fun scenes with cute girls |
| Cons: |
- I mentioned this in almost every one of my reviews for Porn pros but it's a pretty huge mistake and it's very obvious here: they need a better thumbnail system. Right now as you navigate the site you get to see the scenes name and the models in it, but the picture for it is always hard to make out (you often see more of the cock and the girl's forehead than her actual face.)
- Each scene starts with an interview that can get ridiculous. The camera guy asks the girl to deepthroat a dance wand, or a banana or some candy marshmallows. One one hand it can be funny, but then again it takes 5 minutes away from 30 minute scenes. Depends on you if it's a bonus or a con. For me it got repetitive and the girls weren't interesting enough to make it fun.
- Although they do deepthroat none of the scenes are as anywhere as intense as FacialAbuse or Gagfactor or even Teencoreclub. The girl's make-up doesn't get ruined and they don't end up with spit on their faces. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's been a while since I last visited Pornpros and the network has improved in many areas, while maintaining some of the positive stuff that attracted me to them in the first place.
They still get some good looking models and many of them are exclusive. The girls do hardcore (including some impressive deep throating on this site), but it never feels forced or abusive. In fact the whole vibe of the site and the network is fun, ridiculous and over the top fun.
Let me give you some examples of the kind of scenes you can get inside. In one video the girl tries to stuff 24 marshmallows in her mouth and looks like she's about to explode into laughter at how ridiculous the whole thing is. In another scene the girl tries to deepthroat twizlers and almost gets the hickups. It all feels funny and while it can get a bit repetitive if you like the vibe this site is great. (I think at some point or another you get to see girls try to deepthroat bottles of water, sausages, almost all kinds of candy imaginable, bananas, corn, asparagus and celery, oh and cucumbers, how could I forget cucumbers)
Once the interview and the attempt at stuffing ridiculous food down your throat is done the girl goes down on the male model with a lot of closeups of the action. This depends a bit from scene to scene but overall I'd say you get too see everything, even a bit too close for my preference. The BJ sessions are interrupted by sex usually at least twice. Most videos have doggy, reverse cow and some sort of missionary with her legs over her head.
What I found interesting was that most girls really seem to get into the sex and many of then bounce on the guys cock as opposed to him doing all the work. This can be very hot if you like to see a girls round ass as she bounces on a dude in doggy style. I, personally found it extremely hot and different from a lot of sites where the girl just sits there taking it very passively.
The content is pretty similar all throughout the site and most models fit the same mold (big breasts, round asses, a lot of them have tattoos and piercings and although they all say they are 18 or 20 they seem to be somewhere in that 25-ish nebulous porn starlet age)
Some of the cons are that it's not as intense as you'd expect from a site named Deepthroatlove and most action feels too mainstream, no DP, no runny make-up, no really gagging or intense face fucking. In fact very much of the content feels like a pretty standard porn DVD. While this is fine, it does feel like they should get at least some scenes with more umph. Right now I felt like half the scenes here could have been on any other one of the sites in the network. Then again if you just want straight sex with good looking very well made-up girls this will be perfect.
Anyhow, combined with the network access (which gives you more scenes than you'll ever be able to watch) the site is a great deal if you're not looking for very niche porn. For anyone that wants to replace DVD's with the convenience of a major network this site is perfect. It offers enough hardcore action to satisfy most people, stays fun and has consistently high quality.
If they would improve their thumbnail system and get some more unique looking models I'd declare this a perfect site. As it stands this site just didn't fit my personal taste and while I do recommend it, make sure you like their type of content before committing to a membership. |
|
10-23-11 06:59pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
42
|
Cock Competition
(0)
|
|
10-08-11 08:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
43
|
Massage Creep
(4)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Around 100 scenes and updates seem to come every 7 days or so.
- Just like the rest of the network they offer the scenes in a range of formats including very nice looking HD (1250x700) as well as standard sizes and small clips (MP4 and MPG for smaller resolution asn WMV for HD). They also offer HD images for each set at 3,000px × 2,000px (zip archives available).
- Great download speeds, no issues with time-outs or auto-log out
- Good network navigation and similar videos on the rest of the affiliated sites (see my network review for more details for all sites)
- Interesting concept and pretty well executed with some nice banter and good looking models. It's definitely not your regular gonzo, no set up porn, but it's not really the small scene porn from old DVD's
- There is a lot of focus on the girl's body (the guy rubs her with oil all over and you get a lot of nice close-ups)
- Well filmed, good mix of close-up and far away shots, overall the scenes look good |
| Cons: |
- They need a better thumbnail system. Right now the one image they show for each scene is not indicative at all of how the model looks or what will happen in the scene. They also need a way to see all models involved in the site so you could easily browse them (there is a bit too much focus on network wide navigation)
- Some fake cumshots (not many, and the newer stuff seems to be all natural facials, but just a heads up)
- In some scenes the sex doesn't start until minute 20 or so. If you like a good set-up then this site will work well for you, but if you want quick sex this site might be too slow to get to the "good stuff"
- Some scenes are not edited very well (see bellow for more details)
- The download links don't automatically start the download, you have to use a right click save as (no big deal, but really this whole network only had small issues if you like their type of content) |
| Bottom Line: |
I listed several cons up there, but if you read through them you'll see they are mostly cosmetic stuff. They need a better site navigation system, a better preview system for each scene, fixing a link. Stuff that could easily and probably will be fixed in the future. For the most part, the network is strong and there are no big negative aspects, as long as you like their type of content.
I talked a bit in my Pornpros review how the entire network has a unique vibe to it. That is very true for this site as well. The models all look more or less similar (big boobs, young-ish, probably around 20 or so, American and Caucasian)
There is a set up, that feels a lot more natural than the old DVDs where the models were all stiff and unbelievable, but it's a set up nonetheless.
And finally we get about 20 minutes of good old fashioned plain sex (no anal, no ass to mouth, deepthroats, threesomes or other crazy stuff.)
The whole site feels fun and light hearten. A masseur visit some young girl, oils her up then cums on her face and tells her to let it soak in for 5 minutes.
During the massage he talks to her and we hear all about what the girl is studying in school or how she is working out to stay in shape or how loosened up she feels. Around halfway through the video the guy uses a vibrator on her, or gives her head (It's nice to see a site where the guy pleases the girl a bit before the sex) Then we get the sex scene and a facial ending.
Nothing incredibly revolutionary, but nonetheless the scenes are fun to watch and due to the intro we get to know the model better than many other sites. In fact I'd say that is the main strength of this site, instead of just throwing you into a sex scene you get to see the girl, the set-up of the table, the foreplay and you get to hear her talk while her breasts are massaged. In a way it's like an pre-scene interview, but a lot more interesting.
Another strong point is the way a lot of the scenes are filmed with many angles, good close-ups of the girl's breasts (a lot of focus on breasts on this site) some close-ups of the sex as well as interesting sex furniture pillows (they often use these triangle foam shapes that perk the girl's ass into the air and make doggy style look more interesting)
The only issue with the whole idea is that there are some awkward editing mistakes that make some scenes awkward. I remember in the Brooke Adams scene you can hear her moan while her mouth is closed and the guy cums gallons of fake semen on her face. In another scene the director interrupts the actors to give some directions and then calls "Action". We get too see the filming crew in mirrors. Sometimes the male models face is censored (to protect his anonymity I guess) but a few minutes later you can see him clearly.
I know these are not big issues, but when you're trying to create a certain vibe for your scene continuity errors can make it all feel completely fake and kill the mood.
The other downside for me is the quality of the models. I couldn't help but compare this to Fuckedhard18, which has the exact same set-up (massage girls then fuck them :) but Fucked hard has much, much hotter girls. Massage Creep seems to focus mostly on big breasts/big booty regardless of how cute the girl is (a bit too much MILF and tattoos on Massage Creep for my taste), whereas the Fucked hard site is almost entirely young models that look stunning with the oil on their body (maybe it's the way they film as well, as some scenes on Massage Creep could have used a bit more organized light)
I guess it's more of a personal choice really, and I believe the preview pages for each site shows pretty well what kind of girls are on each network so you can draw your own conclusions. Nonetheless Fuckedhard wins over Massage Creep in my book.
Overall, at this point if I had to choose one massage site to join I'd go with FuckedHard18 since the content is very similar, but they have better looking models and more scenes.
However, joining Massage Creep means access to the Porn Pros network, which has a ton more similar videos, some much more attractive girls and a bunch of different content.
I guess as far as bang for you buck Porn pros is the winner, but if you really, really love massage sites FuckedHard is the way to go. |
|
10-08-11 08:06pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
44
|
Porn Pros Network
(3)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Tons and tons of videos, (they seem to have more than 6000 scenes and are uploading 2 per day)
- Videos are available in a range of formats including very nice looking HD (1250x700) as well as standard sizes and small clips. They also offer HD images for each set at 3,000px × 2,000px (zip archives available). Even nicer they offer a trailer for each scene, so you get a quick impression of what will go down.
- Streaming was excellent, downloads are incredibly fast, navigation is easy and the main network site allows quick access to all member sites. Overall the technical aspects of the site look okay.
- Fixed their billing/ spam issues (see bottom line for more details, but a great improvement)
- A lot of different sites that fit many niches including BDSM, cum-shots, MILF, African American, Latino, old on young etc. Focus on young looking girls and hardcore sex (not a ton of anal, DP or deepthroat)
- Some very hot models that seem exclusive (and new to the industry) |
| Cons: |
- Some of the sites in the network don't update very often or at all, the main focus right now seem to be the disgraced and violation sites (which are light BSDM/ a random guy supposedly running up to girls and cumming on them or pulling their clothes off in public) The real ex-girlfriend/ amateur sites and the 18/ Jurassic cock sites.
- Some of the navigation features could still be improved. The models index is a bit wonky especially with girls that appeared in older videos (some links don't work, lead to wrong videos etc.) Nothing big, but still would be nice to see everything work.
- The fake cum shots/ public violation can be either a pro or a con. If you hate over the top videos this network probably has a few sites that might put you off. Overall they have a very specific vibe to the site and some people will love it others will hate it.
- They still have some adds in the member section (Adblocker on Mozilla should take care of everything) |
| Bottom Line: |
This is one of the first networks that I joined years ago and I have to say they have been improving constantly. I remember about a year back when they used to spam your e-mail and I had serious trouble canceling my billing with them. They finally seem to have cleaned up their act and are now focusing on creating some awesome porn. I had no trouble canceling and no spam from them.
They also created a new members page which looks better than before and seems to have fewer bad links. This doesn't mean it's perfect, but it's a good step in the right direction.
Better previews of the scenes would help (right now they have only one image a few categories and a verbal description, unless you click on the scene), as would a way to find all anal scenes from one model for example. Right now they don't have any way to do this kind of cross tab search. Nonetheless, they offer category search, model search, site specific search... overall unless you want a very specific video you shouldn't have trouble finding good content.
Another improvement would be if they offered more hardcore scenes. Don't get me wrong the disgraced series is pretty fun and intense (want to see a girl get tied up and fucked in a swing or while clothespins are stretching her pussy out? This site has it) However the site has almost no anal scenes (a lot that are labeled anal are actually light ass play) and almost no true deepthroats (although the deepthroatlove site is changing that don't expect to see too many girls with smeared make-up or spit/ semen on their faces)
Right now the site focuses on having good looking young girls (even the MILF, look young) doing regular sex scenes. And I believe they have some of the best straight sex scenes out there. A ton of new girls, along with several better known models, but all of them with awesome bodies, great make-up, good lighting, good camera work and some pretty well hung male models.
Almost all scenes start with a bit of an interview so you get a feel for the girl, then we get to the action which can be pretty varied (they have several threesomes, POV, the light bondage series as well as more traditional little scenes).
Sometimes they use fake cocks and fake cum, which seems to disagree with many people, but I'd say that maybe only one site that is still updating does that (cum-shot surprise). So it's pretty easy to ignore those scenes, especially when you get over 6000 other videos to choose from.
In the sections above I mentioned that the site has a specific vibe to it. I'd like to talk a bit about this. The Porn Pros network always had a strong fun, classic porn identity. They don't do the whole innocent Lolita or the abuse the female model spiel. With this network you get good old fashioned porn. Hot girls that look like they are having fun and a lot of regular sex in over the top situations. This is not Facialabuse or Met-art, this is the kind of almost mainstream porn that used to be all over the DVD market, except Porn Pros makes it look even better and offers a ton of variations so you won't get bored.
The Disgraced series isn't really that disgraceful or abusive, but for someone that doesn't care for intense, humiliating BDSM they are just the right amount of deviant to be fun.
The amateur sites they offer follow the same model. Sure we get a bunch of shots of the girl in the mirror and POV shots, but the quality is still miles above anything a true amateur could produce and just different enough to keep me entertained.
That feels like the key to this network, they aim to entertain. Even the fake cum falls into that model, sure it's fake, but it's entertaining to stuff squirting on them. It's all meant to be light hearted fun and form some people that works (I love their vibe, their fun scenes and the hot models).
Bottom line: Don't expect this network to fit into a narrow niche. If you want only intense BDSM or truly amateur scenes or would rather see all anal sex, then I believe there are many other better sites for you. However for 18 bucks, considering the amount of content you get and the high quality of the models it's a shame not to give this network a try. |
|
10-05-11 08:00pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
45
|
Porn Pros Network
(3)
|
|
07-14-11 08:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
46
|
Teen BFF
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Part of the Porn Pros network, one of the more creative uses of reality porn.
- Has 42 sets overall, videos are near HD quality, but are a little grainy, I'm thinking for that "authentic amateur" feel.
- All 42 scenes are ones I will keep and really think this reality niche has been missed by most networks.
- Download speeds are very good with a DL manager, terrible without a DL manager.
- Has a good believability factor going for it. Even though you will probably know these models are porn stars, they do a good enough job of making it seem realistic to convince me with a little help from my imagination.
- Biggest pictures go up to 3000 long end, but some, keeping to that amateur theme are much smaller like a cellphone picture, 800 long end.
- Still updating, but the updates are now only once every two weeks, instead of weekly as they were in Duke's TBP review.
- All the models are cute, some stunners like Melanie Rios, quite a few Latinas on this site. |
| Cons: |
- There are only 42 scenes. Of course, you get the network access to offset that, but really think Porn Pros has hit on a niche here that they should be really pushing.
- Some bad camera angles, could add more to the amateur feel, but bad camerawork is frustrating nonetheless. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've seen these "hacked" sites for years, ex-girlfriend revenge, dorm room parties. While it's not really believable that someone hacked someone's social networking site and stole their near HD videos of hardcore sex, which wouldn't be allowed on those sites anyway, I think this one does a good job of making it just believable enough.
Though this site does follow a certain formula in the videos, it's one that we don't see much in porn these days. Every scene I've watched so far starts with the women clothed, trying on clothes, doing all the things us perverted men like to believe goes on, though the pillow fight goes a little far. They have been able to put models on this site that I could see doing these things. As the silliness, which is good in this case, slows, the girls start kissing and you get pretty much a lesbian scene, then a guy shows up and gets in on the fun.
The picture sets take this one further by having the girls taking pictures of themselves in the mirror. Flashing each other, these create a real feeling of playfulness when looking at them. Maybe there's a deep concept going on here or maybe they just got lucky by filming it this way, but I did find these scenes to be as believable as any reality scenes in porn.
The bad camera angles are annoying, but I do think they add to the amateur feel of it.
Now, this site gave me fits without a DL manager, I actually downloaded one scene, the newest update, Veronica and Mandy, in all 3 formats, twice each and still didn't get a full download without it breaking. Nearly every scene had 404 file not found on download links through the browser. Once I used a download manager with username and password stored in it, everything downloaded fine and no 404 files.
The videos are an odd 1240x702 resolution, I don't mind that's it not exactly 720p. The selling point here are the pictures that create a realistic feel to the scenes. You're onto something here Porn Pros. The pictures probably have the first 10 minutes of the girls just coming home from a party or clubbing, changing clothes, being frisky with each other, then the video picks up with the action. I like it.
The photos in the mirrors also seem better than your standard, "pose this way" photos on porn sites, since the girls are being silly in them.
The action is generally very good. A few of the models that really shine here are Gigi Rivera, Melanie Rios and Tanner Mayes. Though my favorite scene has Lynn and Ella in it, the Latina one does some serious ride 'em cowboy on the guy. The site has a lot of personality to it.
Though small in size, I've been on sites that have 1,000 videos that I don't keep 42 scenes from, so I think this site was worthy of a review and is one of the reasons that I ended up liking the Porn Pros network.
All very good models, good, fun and original concept with younger, cute models. Can't beat that. Very nice site with a lot of network content to back it up! |
|
06-13-11 07:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
47
|
Porn Pros Network
(3)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Big network with some unusual niches in it and a love of fake cumshots, not as bad as it sounds.
- Any concern with billing shouldn't be, they made me a very good "stay" offer of more than half off, when declined, got the email saying canceled within seconds.
- Video tech specs are good, close to standard HD, but videos are shot in a more amateurish way, not saying the cameramen aren't good, but the videos seem to try to have a homemade look to them.
- Photo quality is very good,
- Definitely looks to be exclusive
- Major pro here, this site seems to love the use of download managers, will explain in BL. 3000 long end resolution and come zipped.
- Some of the sites, Massage Creep, Flexible Positions, are as good as most sites in those niches and would say Massage Creep is the best Massage site I've seen.
- Some interesting ideas where porn stars do things women on social sites do, like photos in mirror, to give the amateur feel to it and pull it off pretty well.
- |
| Cons: |
- Navigation is frustrating. My first example is that some models just aren't listed, Stephani Moretti as example, clicked her name, instead of seeing her updates, I got all the new updates from all models. Can't find her in the model list either and she has multiple sets on their various sites. Works pretty good on most and maybe this is just one rare case, but seeing that she's one of the models I really like that they have it stuck out to me.
- The fake sites are just silly. I'm sure it was funny the first few times, but they really should stick with the other sites they have and let those fake dicks and gallons of fake cum sites die off.
- Not always a con for me, but there are quite a lot of implants and tattoos here, that Freak Boobs site is just bad.
- Download speeds without a manager were bad, had broken files, sets not showing up 404 errors, but the download manager seems to have cured that problem. |
| Bottom Line: |
If I hadn't went back to using a download manager, Free Download Manager, I would have knocked at least 20 points off this network's score. I haven't been using DL manager lately on any sites. So when I started downloading from this site through my browser, the right click on the link would either give me a 404 error or start trying to stream the video, left click, save as worked better, but probably half of the files would stop downloading around 70% finished. Then there was the problem with the DL speed through the browser, I usually can get near or slightly above 2 MB/s or for better comparison 2000 KB/s instead, I was receiving 400 KB/s through the browser.
FDM saved the month though, using it, the site works really good and the download speeds are almost as high as I can receive from any site.
These fake sites on this network are a waste in my opinion. And it's not just one fake dick, fake cum sites, I'm counting five, though it looks like all have stopped updating except one and that one only updates once a month. Good move in my opinion.
The bad thing with one navigation problem, like with trying to find Stephani Moretti, is that I now don't know if the navigation for other models is showing all their content.
The good news is, they have some ideas going on in this network that I really liked. The Teen BFF site, though porn stars, brings a very amateur feel with the girls doing the mirror photos, the silly photos, that's pretty good for any of potential members that are used to seeing similar pictures on the social networking sites.
The technical quality is very good. The videos say HD, but from looking at the codec info, it's a little lower than 720p, I'm seeing 1250x702. The pictures are as good as you will see on a network, nice to see the clothed pictures in the zips too, 3000 long end on those.
Some unusual niches like Public Violations where you watch a video to see, a guy run up behind a woman and pull her shirt up or pants down or runs up and pulls his dick out. Video over. A few scenes on this site are public sex, so those are pretty good.
Massage Creep, Teen BFF, Flexible Positions, Real Ex-Girlfriends, 18 Years Old, Disgraced 18, Amateur Violations, Webcam Hackers, Jurassic Cock and Cruelty Party are all still updating, I think, one may just be a monthly update since its last update was in May, these sites are all very good. Those sites to me really boost this network with some interesting niches and plays on reality porn. Most of the models are well-known and most in these scenes are models I like, even if implanted and tattooed. Loved the Isis Taylor scenes.
Once past the download problems through browser and away from the fake cum sites, Freaks of Cock, Freaks of Boobs sites, this became a very good network. Nice quality, I don't mind that it's not 1080p as the files are big enough as it is. Overall, I would recommend it with the warning of the fake cum and Freaks sites and use of DL manager. |
|
06-13-11 06:13pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
48
|
Porn Pros Network
(3)
|
|
05-30-11 04:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
49
|
Massage Creep
(4)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Part of PornPros Network
- Discount through TBP / PU
- Multiple download options
- Streaming available
- No DRM
- Watermark is small enough to be ignored
- Pics available (both separate and screecaps)
- Pics available as a zip
- Supports download managers
- 60 exclusive scenes (as of review date)
- Site updates weekly |
| Cons: |
- “HD” doesn’t look like true HD |
| Bottom Line: |
I wouldn’t normally review two sites within the same network, but I have to make an exception here because of the quality of this site. I recently reviewed Jurassic Cock from the same network but think Massage Creep deserves a specific review.
I’m not normally a big fan of sites that use a narrow and limiting set-up. I find that the repetition gets boring. With a site featuring a male massaging a female, how much innovation and difference can you bring to each scene? Not much.
But… even with the limiting set-up, the scenes on this site just seem to work well. I’ve never had a membership to a massage site and I didn’t join this network for this site, but it was a pleasant surprise to find to be as good as it is.
The set-up is predictable: the male masseur brings his equipment to a scheduled appointment at a girl’s house or apartment. He sets up and instructs the girl to undress and slip under the sheet on the table. The camera gives the viewer a ‘hidden camera’ perspective as the model undresses and gets under the sheet. Then the massage begins, with lots of baby oil being used. The massage eventually progresses to where the sheet is removed and towel placed over the model – with camera angles giving the viewer some nice views. Eventually the model rolls over, with towels being strategically placed for modesty. Eventually the naughty bits get massaged with oil, and then the “deep tissue” massage begins. And in a bit of marketing genius, the masseur always includes a “free facial” at the end of the session.
While using the same set-up over and over again for all of the 60 scenes sounds boring and repetitive, it still works. In my opinion, it works for two reasons: the acting is good and models are stunning. There isn’t a lot of variety in the types of models, so this could be a deal-breaker if you like older (25+) or fuller-figured models since the majority of the models are young and petite.
This site is part of the PornPros network and the technical bits are the same as I listed in my review of Jurassic Cock. The highlights of the technical stuff are that there is streaming and download available. Downloads are available in MPG, MP4 and WMV HD. I’m not convinced that the HD is true HD. (1250x702 and 2651kbps bitrate.) Photos are available (both actual photos and screencaps) and zips are available. The photos are hi-res and look great.
One complaint I have that is purely subjective is that the entire network, including this site has very little anal sex. There is one scene listed as including anal, but I think that’s in error. I didn’t see any buggery in the scene.
If you’re interested in a massage site I can definitely recommend this one. I don’t have experience with any other massage sites, but this one is definitely worth the price of admission. Joining through TBP/PU gets you a discount too. Plus you get access to the rest of the network with some other excellent sites. |
|
05-17-11 08:10am
Replies (4)
|
Review
50
|
Jurassic Cock
(2)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Part of PornPros Network
- Discount through TBP / PU
- Multiple download options
- Streaming available
- No DRM
- Watermark is small enough to be ignored
- Pics available (both separate and screecaps)
- Pics available as a zip
- Supports download managers
- 77 exclusive scenes (as of review date)
- Site updates weekly |
| Cons: |
- “HD” doesn’t look like true HD
- Not enough anal. (Yes, I know that’s very subjective.) |
| Bottom Line: |
I realize that the niche of having old guys fuck young women is not for everyone, but if it is something you like to watch, this site is definitely worth checking out.
Many of the girls on this site are a “who’s who” of A-list porn starlets today, and the format is one that definitely accentuates their youthful appearances. Girls such as Ashlii Orion, Jaelyn Fox, Amai Lui and Jada Stevens all make appearances. Some lesser known (but hopefully up-‘n’-coming) girls like Cheyenne Cooper are also here. Each scene is approximately 30 minutes long and there is usually a stereotypical setup for a scene with a young girl and an older guy: teacher, supervisor, driving instructor or something similar to further accentuate the age difference between the girl and the guy.
The guys are obviously a bigger part of the scene than would be acceptable in most porn scenes, BUT they never really get in the way of scene like many younger, self-indulgent male models do. The guys seem to know that they’re there to help show off the girl. And they should know that since the guys have a lot of experience in the business. Since there aren’t too many geezers still actually working in porn today, the talent pool is pretty shallow. Rod Fontana is here, as are a few other ‘seniors’ who I can’t name. One of them looks like Adolf Hitler and another looks like a slightly younger version of Col. Sanders. Perhaps the biggest male name here is also the most polarizing: Ron Jeremy. You either love him or hate him. Ron appears in a large number of the scenes. That may be a testament to his reliability.
As for the technical bits, the site is pretty standard for a good porn site. There are 77 scenes posted (with updates being added). Each scene offers a trailer to get an idea if you want to download the scene. If you do want to download, you have three options: MPG, MP4 and WMV HD. The HD doesn’t appear to be true HD though. (1250x702 and 2651kbps bitrate. I’m not sure if that qualifies as HD, but it doesn’t look as sharp as I’m used to with other HD stuff.)
The site also offers photos. Both screencaps and actual photos are available, either individually or as a zipped set. The photos I looked at were high-resolution and looked great (3000x1996).
This is purely subjective, but there aren’t enough anal scenes here. Anal sex is a turn-off for some, but it is pretty mainstream and it is apparent in its absence here. It may be that most of the models don’t do anal (yet!), but of the 77 scenes there are only 4 or 5 anal, which seems low.
This site is part of a network that offers some interesting and innovative other sites, though for the $17.95 TBP discount price, this site alone is worth it. The network and individual sites are fairly simple and straightforward to use. There is no reliance on gimmicks. The search function is limited, but simple to use and effective.
If you like this kind of niche, I’d highly recommend this. |
|
05-14-11 09:09pm
Replies (2)
|
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 1.59 seconds.
|
|
