Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Webmaster Profile A detailed history of activity from this webmaster in all different categories.
Webmaster : Robert Kink (0)

View Feedback:   Replies (0)         Other:   Site Feedback (635)   |   Replies Received (0)

Incoming Feedback All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites.
Shown : 26-50 of 210 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
26
Visit Divine Bitches

Divine Bitches
(2)

86.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Female domination of men. I don't know if it always includes the extra site, but when I joined it included Men in Pain.
- Unlike the last Kink site I reviewed (Public Disgrace), Divine Bitches and the added Men in Pain, combine for a very large collection. Large collection does have downfalls, will explain in BL.
- Divine Bitches has the full options on videos with HD being offered on close to 90% of all videos.
- I'm only putting pictures here because they do have them. The quality of them and how they are downloaded are cons.
- There seems to be varying degrees of femdom that this site showcases. Some of it is particularly interesting to me as someone with a past in psychology, other parts will turn a lot off, though I wasn't bothered by any of it. Will explain in BL.
- I like how Kink uses models who are mostly unknown or better yet, more exclusive to their sites, but as with anything it can be repetitive.
- Weekly update on Divine Bitches, no updates on Men in Pain.
Cons: - I'll start with the main one. I knew going in that there was cuckold scenes. If you are offended by gay acts, you probably shouldn't join this site. I will further this in BL.
- The pictures are downloadable only in part zips. The quality of them is only 1280x720.
- This was talked about in my comment for this site in the replies, these men who the women are dominating, are mostly effeminate. It does take away most of the believability.
Bottom Line: This was probably the most far-reaching porn experience for me. I have talked about my interest in the lighter side of cuckold. This is seen most in the DVDs like "Please Screw My Wife". With a long interest in the power/control aspects of sex, this genre at least interested me. I don't want this to turn into a lecture on psychological theory, but I'm on the side of humans who believes sex is most enjoyed when it's more lust than love. I also buy into the belief that there's a very thin line between love and hate, anger and joy and each of these represents a very strong emotion.

Men in Pain is a bonus site, but I'm guessing by looking at the update dates, Divine Bitches just became Men in Pain v.2. The Men in Pain site is mostly scenes with typical physical control games being played by the women. This site wouldn't interest me very much, but it is a nice bonus since you will see some more mainstream female models being very aggressive, which is rare for them. One that comes to mind is Jasmine Byrne. I always saw her as the pretty, little glamor model who went into submissive hardcore porn. Also can get some older scenes of Isis Love back when she was blonde and pre-implants. Outside of that though, Men in Pain, is of very little interest. I'm not exactly in position to fantasize about a small woman dominating me physically. I can see that now. Jasmine slapping me if she could reach my face, me saying, "aww that's cute". Sorry for the humor.

Divine Bitches is a whole other experience. This goes into mental and emotional pain. It has plenty of physical pain too, but it isn't limited to it. What you end up getting are scenes like this, woman tells her best female friend about her jerk husband. Female friend finds a big, tough guy and they go over to the woman's house. They force the husband to watch as his wife has sex with the other man.

Then they took it to a new level. Not only is the husband being forced to watch his wife have sex with another man, he's being forced to stick his face within inches of the penetration. His wife is saying things like compliments to the new man on his size and how her husband doesn't compare. We're getting deep here.

Then they took it to a new level. Not only is the man facing all the things in the above paragraph, but he's having to take the cumshot from the other man, giving the other man oral, in between pumps of his wife. This was a line to me.

It wasn't a line because it went too far. It became more obvious at that last level, the men being forced were bisexual or gay. I'm in no way trying to be an asshole about this, but the husband walks in the scene in a dress suit and tie. He has a masculine look. Then as soon as it comes time for him to do something labeled as "gay" he arches his back and becomes feminine. You lose me there.

This also applies to the scenes with just a male and female. Some of these men look to be lubing themselves up for a strap-on from their woman. Whether this goes into a gay act or not isn't the point. The point is it's about domination! The willing being dominated is not domination. Simple as that.

Overall, the site is good. The storylines are believable and even enjoyable in a distorted way. Like with other Kink sites, I do think you have to bring your imagination with you because of the fine line between what would be accepted and what would be going to far. For example, would having a real husband and wife in a scene, with the real straight male being forced to give a man a blowjob, be going into breaking laws? Keep the imagination handy and if you do, it's a good, very different site that might touch some emotions in you. And I'll give them a lot of credit for being risky and pushing boundaries, even if my imagination is still required.

The quality on the videos is pretty simple. Everything on Divine Bitches has up to HD except maybe 10 scenes. Each scene has smaller versions as well. With Men in Pain, you're going to be all over the place in quality. I downloaded one that was highest mp4 and it was 340x280. Did another and it was 720x480. Photo and navigation problems are the same as other Kink sites. No full photo zip download. Model list takes you to a network wide listing of each model and even if you have a membership to a site a scene is on, it tries to get you to sign up for the site or use pay on demand kinks, so it's useless. The best way to navigate the Kink sites is scroll, scroll, scroll.

These negatives are still fairly small and not enough to take away much from the site's overall grade. I do think for those who like to see women in dominant roles, it does the job. I could nitpick and say if the men were more masculine or even put up the least bit of resistance, but you do get the feeling the type of domination they are going for is the woman saying, "If you want me you will do what I say" and they do that well.

Another very good site from Kink that is recommended for those who are into this genre.

11-19-12  02:24pm

Replies (1)
Rating
27
Visit The Upper Floor

The Upper Floor
(0)

90.0
No Review.
11-07-12  06:56pm

Rating
28
Visit Divine Bitches

Divine Bitches
(2)

90.0
No Review.
11-07-12  06:55pm

Rating
29
Visit Public Disgrace

Public Disgrace
(2)

80.0
No Review.
11-07-12  06:53pm

Rating
30
Visit The Training Of O

The Training Of O
(2)

95.0
No Review.
11-07-12  06:52pm

Review
31
Visit Public Disgrace

Public Disgrace
(2)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - It's public sex that sometimes isn't really public, that other times is very kinky.
- As with every Kink site I've been a member on there are high quality photos and videos and plenty of imagination with each scene.
- Navigation issues aren't too bad here since I had never been a member of the site and just scrolled through the updates, making it quite easy to navigate.
- European sets seem to really push the public limit with sex on streets and in barely hidden places that the viewer can still see the society functioning around. Will go further in BL.
- Models can be hit or miss for me. The older European sets had more models I am familiar with, but the newer sets, mostly shot around or in the Kink armory have models I'm not as familiar with. One thing that keeps this in the pros are the appearances of Isis Love in several scenes, though not listed in the model credits.
- Download speed is always above average on Kink sites
Cons: - Scenes in America may push the limit of misleading advertising. I'm not of this belief, but the comment section of the newer American scenes have 20% comments complaining that they are not public, will further in BL.
- I'm beating, maybe flogging would be a better word since it's Kink, the dead horse when I complain about the photo sets being broken up into parts, but I feel it's important for potential members to know.
- While the site is plenty large enough, considering the complexity of the scenes, I don't know if it offers much for multi-month memberships or for many return visits. Numbers in BL.
Bottom Line: This site had been one on my list to join. The last 4 sites I have joined are Kink sites. My overall impression of this site is good, but at times, I was either thinking things went too far or things were way too protected.

With any exhibitionism or voyeur site, I do need at least some believability. I have enough of an imagination to make most scenes believable. Having said that, I know a lot of porn viewers don't. The members comments on Public Disgrace use words like "false advertising" and "bait and switch" and these are not just 1 or 2 comments, but maybe 5-10 on some scenes. This is my feeling on it.

In the earlier scenes on this site, starting in 2008, it was more of an exhibitionism site than disgrace site. These scenes included recording the male and female models having sex in subway steps as traffic and people walked by. It included sex by the road as traffic went by. From what I can tell by the license plates on the cars it was nearly all shot in Europe. There are complaints about "where is the disgrace?" They do have some scenes that go into bondage in public places, but the majority of the scenes that are outside in Europe are much more regular sex as described earlier in this paragraph. The scenes take on a decided turn to filming in and around the Kink armory in San Francisco. They bring in a crowd to watch, these rarely go into the exhibitionism like the European scenes did since it's a controlled crowd and controlled environment, but these do bring in more disgrace than the European scenes.

How disgraceful? I'm sure it's subjective. There is writing on the model's body, "I'm a slut", "Whore" to dumping food on the model to heavy bondage. These scenes remind me more of Sex and Submission type scenes. Where you as a member have to choose is if you prefer the more public, less disgrace scenes or less public, more disgrace scenes. Only a small amount of the scenes really do both. I do understand and respect the possible laws they had to be concerned about breaking so I'm not really against either side, but I do prefer the more public, less disgrace.

Overall the site is pretty big considering the niche and complexity of each scene, however, it only updates once a week.

As of 11/7/2012 there are a total of 209 scenes. These scenes include photos and video. The videos are quite long ranging from 45 minutes to 90 minutes. The photos are split into parts on the zips.

If you're big on technical quality, this site delivers. These are the video options.
Smaller Screen is 640x360 in MP4 format
Most compatible is 960x540 in WMV format
Windows Media HD is 1280x720 in WMV format
Highest Quality MP4 is 1280x720 in H264 MP4 format

All 209 scenes have those options.

Navigation is pretty limited, but with 209 scenes, you can just scroll through pages of 14 scenes per page. It doesn't do much good to use the model search since it takes you to all the model's scenes on their family of sites, most of which, you won't have a membership to.

As mentioned earlier you get one new scene per week. With the newer scenes turning more to the disgrace side, this could be a problem for me with future joins. I don't want to say all of the American scenes are bad though. Quite a few are in more public places than the Kink armory and as long as they work the crowd into it, whether a controlled crowd or environment or not, I will still like those scenes.

Where they lose me is in the disgrace part. I don't mind bondage, but we saw a bunch of immature sites years ago try the writing on the model's bodies angle and it failed miserably for them. I don't think it's that I'm offended as much as it is that I expect more from Kink than this. I would think anytime you're dealing with a niche like disgrace there are lines that go into "That's not disgrace, it's just silly". On the other side, I wouldn't want them to truly go into disgracing the models either since I'm not even for sure how far that would have to go. The last side of it is I don't ever hold a site to stick directly with their name since the amount of urls available isn't that large and I don't know if I would ever want to be on a site that never changes.

I enjoyed the site though. It's different enough from the mainstream to keep my attention on it. I would like to see more public exhibitionism, but more than that, just enough to give my imagination something to work with. The body writing makes my imagination want to get a washcloth and soap to wash it off. Not exactly the point of joining a porn website.

I would recommend it to most anyone. The disgrace is if anything silly and playful. The models are pretty and some have never been seen. I just don't think if you're really into disgrace you're going to get it here and outside of the Euro scenes, I don't think you're going to truly get a lot of public sex unless you're able to tap into your imagination some. The one admittedly biased part is Isis Love being in some of the newer scenes.

11-07-12  03:01pm

Replies (5)
Review
32
Visit Whipped Ass

Whipped Ass
(1)

92.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +They have over 1900 scenes to choose from.
+They manage to hire some really hot models all through the years and get them to do some intense BSDM.
+They update with one new scene each week.
+You can stream the videos online.
+You can download all the videos in the mp4 format with a resolution of
+All the videos from 2007 to now are offered in HD with the mp4 and WMV format.
+There is a calendar where you can view the upcoming shoots for all their sites.
+A membership to one site gives you discounts to the other Kink sites.
Cons: -I think my biggest issue with this site is that the BSDM is sometimes a little too intense for my taste.
-There are some doms that aren't as good as others or the chemistry between them and the sub is just not there and that tends to ruin the scene.
-They have some pics but they do such a poor job with them that they are almost worthless and you can't download the entire photoset into a single file because they split the sets in 3 or more parts.
-The quality of the videos for their eartly stuff ison the poor side of things. That's most of the stuff prior to 2006
Bottom Line: *This is a Kink site so if you have been a member of any of their other sites then you know that these guys take their porn seriously and try to offer the best porn possible. That's probably why they are still dishing out top quality porn and able to hire the top girls. Even in these hard economic times and in the era of tube sites.

*This site is designed for people who like g/g porn but with the bsdm aspect added to it. The level of bsdm varies from video to video so it's hard to say just how intense it is but it feels like it has gotten a liitle more intense in recent months. Of course that could be because the performers being hired are more into it so the dom will give her sub a lot more then she might some a newbie.

*Anal penetration is common in many of the videos so that's something to consider if you aren't into that. There is some fisting but it is on the rare side so it shouldn't be an issue for most people.

**I tend to join about once every year or so but I would probably join more often if the level of bsdm was not as high as it is. My tolerance for it is rather low so more sex and less whipping would be great.

***The only people that should avoid this site are those that don't know what the words dom and sub mean or don't like bsdm.

10-20-12  06:37pm

Replies (0)
Comment
33
Visit Divine Bitches

Divine Bitches
(2)

A little off the beaten path

I tried this site out for a month while a member on another Kink site. If you're looking for different than the norm, this is the place to start. You also get a bonus subscription to Men in Pain. Everything is the same as it is on other Kink sites. I didn't download all the scenes on Divine Bitches, but I do believe every scene has the HD option on videos. The pictures are separated into chapters which will always be an annoyance with Kink sites.

I know at least one member has mentioned Ashley Fires. She has quite a bit of content on here. Men in Pain has the very underrated Jasmine Byrne in ways most porn fans have never seen her. Really, the majority of this content is going to be different than nearly everything you've seen.

A bit of a warning ahead of time. There are what I would consider extreme cuckold scenes blended in. I'm still not real familiar with the depth of the cuckold genre, but I have always liked the sites that do what I guess is a lesser version of cuckold, where the husband watches his wife have sex. On this site, there are some of those, but there are also some where the husband is forced to give the wife's lover a blowjob and/or take the cumshot. So things could be going to an extreme there. These scenes are limited to the Divine Bitches site. Men in Pain is more along the lines of one on one femdom.

I can't say I would recommend it unless you're into the genre. For me, it was okay since I do like the dominant female scenarios. It goes well beyond the mainstream porn world though. Definitely one that you will want to look at the preview of before joining. A big positive for me was the models. Outside of a couple of Kink sites, you won't find a lot of well-known models, but Divine Bitches has quite a few. Lots of Isis Love on both sites for fans of Isis too.

10-01-12  12:57pm

Replies (5)
Review
34
Visit Ultimate Surrender

Ultimate Surrender
(1)

86.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Women wrestling, clothed, partially clothed and nude. One of Kink's oldest sites.
- Has more content than I'll ever get to.
- Tag team live matches in front of a crowd are some of my favorite scenes in all of pornland.
- Working Isis Love in as ref and extra strap-on is a great idea. I could just watch her walk around.
- Scripted and non-scripted are very subjective words, but I will give them credit for being the most physical of the wrestling sites.
- Nice photo sets, but see the cons and BL for more on this.
- Download speeds are usually extremely good, but there was one day of 1/20th regular download speed and just today the site had a few maintenance issues.
- Dragon Lily. It's not just a site with her on it, but she's a real star here. One of the sexiest, curvy, Asian/Pacific Islander models I've ever seen.
- Get a discount to most of their other sites while a member, believe it's $19.95 on each one you add.
Cons: - Site design. This doesn't just apply to Ultimate Surrender, but most of the Kink sites I've been on. Have a membership to two right now and both suffer from the same problems.
- Trying to find a balance. I've competed in martial arts, Greco Roman wrestling and mixed martial arts. Dragon Lily really stands out here because she seems to be very skilled in grappling and flexibility. The combination of athleticism and sexy is perfect with her. A lot of the matches end up being more like foreplay for a lesbian porn scene.
- And those mutli-zip photo sets. There is a reason and defined reason for this, round 1, round 2, round 3, round 4, but each one is only 10-20 MB and requires multiple clicks to download each. I have a round downloaded before I can get back and start another round's zips downloading.
Bottom Line: I like Kink sites as a diversion for me. I've almost always liked only glam sites, solo sites, but Kink has me convinced they are "good guys" when it comes to hard, dominating sex and they are perfect for me when I start getting bored with the softer porn.

I do stay frustrated with the site design and the way the photo zips work. Kink does listen so I'm hoping they at least will consider this. To download one match's photos you have to go through this process, click on photos, click on which round, there are 4 rounds in each match, click on download zip, back click, click on round 2, click download, back click, click on round 3, click on download, back click, click on round 4, click download, back click. That's 12 clicks to get one full match's photos. If I'm wrong for complaining about that have Dragon Lily and Isis Love punish me!

This click-a-thon does make the photo sets less appealing to me. Maybe put a full set download link? Or how about even a little zip icon beside each round? Full set would allow one click downloading. Zip icon beside each would be 4 clicks. I could put up with 4, but 12 is just frustrating. Though not applying directly to this site, I've also seen other Kink sites using this multiple click per photo set download.

The site itself is believable to a point. Some of the girls look like they are giving their all to win a match, others look like they just want to lose and have sex. Dragon Lily, Isis Love are both very competitive in it and both are also funny. Sorry Lily, but you telling a woman, "You cannot cum yet" is funny to me and strangely, kind of cute.

The live matches are the standouts. These do seem to be a little less realistic from a competitive view, because they allow double teams, which are always fun. I won't criticize the site for being scripted though. Girls do get injured. Some matches stopped because of injury even.

Where the site succeeds the most. Quality, quantity and hard lesbian sex. I have always had problems watching the harder boy/girl scenes with slapping, but it's pretty hot when it's two sweating, naked women. I do now understand the scoring better than I did on my last review of this site and can see how they are trying to create a real athletic competition with erotic additions.

Video quality can be varied and confusing, which goes back to site design. These are the options on newer ones, Most Compatible (wmv), Highest Quality HD (mp4), Smaller Screens iPod, iPad (mp4), Windows Media HD (wmv). Some of the times, I have downloaded the most compatible option and gotten mid level wmv files in the 720x480 range. So I finally just selected Highest Quality mp4 and it will remember that from scene to scene, but because the site has so much content on it, some of the scenes highest quality mp4 is 640x360. That can be frustrating since on those, the wmv is usually 720x480. It would probably be way too much of a pain to list the resolution beside of each, but it should be mentioned since you have to check each file to see if you got the best quality one available for that scene.

Search could be improved. If you go to "All Seasons" there are 8 listed previous seasons, but they have started season 10. Most of all though, I would love to see an option to just select the live scenes, but it's not here unless I'm overlooking something. I instead go through the updates looking for ones I can see a crowd in. Sounds easy enough, but each page only lists 7 shoots and the live ones are released by round, so you have to dig even more to find the full live scenes and if you want the pictures to those, it's back to looking for each round. Why the full scene video download doesn't have a full scene photo zip download doesn't make much sense.

The Kink sites I have been on all have these different problems with photo sets being split up to maybe tell a story or make sure if you're not OCDC, you will be. The design and frustration has lowered my score from a 90 a few years ago, but if you're not interested in the photos, the score would be in the lower 90s.

Using my most basic method of figuring up how much content, I'm going to multiply the number of pages of updates multiplied by how many scenes per page. There are 84 pages of updates, 7 scenes per page, so that's 588, but the live ones are split, so the number isn't that high. The site has updates dating back to 2004, they update every week.

The live scenes are what brings me back though. Having Isis being more active as a ref, joining in the sex part has really helped the site. Her performance as an unknowing spectator in one live scene is my personal favorite scene of my porn collection.

It's different, it's the hardest lesbian content I've found and it even has some genuine laughs in it. Once you get beyond the site design problems and search issues, you have one of the most original sites on the internet. Recommended to those who are looking for something different and lesbian fans.

09-10-12  05:38pm

Replies (6)
Review
35
Visit The Training Of O

The Training Of O
(2)

95.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Huge collection of innovative videos
- Unique niche
- Multiple download options
- Photos available
- Beautiful models
- Hardcore sex in BDSM settings
Cons: - Limited search function
- Organization could be improved
- File names vary and are of limited use
- No tags assigned to videos
- Some missing scenes
Bottom Line: TTOO was the first Kink site I joined several years back and it remains my favourite. Most BDSM sites put a woman in bondage and inflict some pain. Some sites have a unique theme (Water Bondage) but the underlying premise is the same. TTOO is different: there is bondage, humiliation and pain, but the premise is the training of a submissive woman. The niche is the making of a sub, not what can be done after the sub is created.

The traditional TTOO shoots are broken down into days, with the normal training regime being conducted over four days. The intensity of the training is increased as each day passes. Bondage, humiliation, demeaning work, pain and training are all here. Sex occurs in the shoots. The sex is very well done but isnít the main focus: it occurs as part of the training, not just for the sex itself. The end product is near four hours of some intense video per shoot with exceptional production values.

In the past couple of years TTOO has added a new kind of shoot to keep things interesting. This is still about training, but theyíll bring in multiple girls to audition to be trained. These can last from one to four days and involve much of the same kinds of training as the main scenes, but have an extra element of competition. These share the usual high production standards that Kink has. These are innovative and a welcome addition to the site.

The technical stuff is standard for all Kink sites. Each scene has its own page where the video can be streamed or downloaded. Downloads are available in either WMV or Mp4 format. Two resolutions are available for both formats. The highest resolution for both comes in at 1280x720.

Like all Kink sites, TTOO offers photos as singles and zips, but this really isnít a photo site so I wonít go into any detail.

Iím a HUGE fan of the Kink sites and I may have been blind to some faults because of that. The faults are fairly minor but just look more serious given the overall quality of the site. I think that for a site to be exceptional it has to provide excellent porn, make that easily available to members and has to be well organized. Obviously the first element is the most important, and Kink delivers: this is incredible porn. They succeed in the member access by allowing download managers and having servers that never slow down and give some of the highest download speeds Iíve encountered. Where Kink falls down is in site organization.

To keep this succinct, here are my specific concerns:

- Limited search function Ė the search function is limited and doesnít work well. The problem appears that when you search a term the only thing it searches is the scene title, not the performers. So searching for star X wonít get you a scene if the scene is titled ďRope Slut.Ē You can search the model index but that isnít great either. You can locate scenes on specific Kink sites but you canít download them from there. The solution is to take a few key words from the title and go back to the main site page and search those terms.

- File names vary and are of limited use Ė this is likely subjective, but the file naming convention has no standardization. If you want to have any hope of organizing the scenes into related groups youíll need to do it as you download. One bright note is that each scene has a unique shoot number as part of the name and that can be searched. The issue is you may download ď1234_BobbiĒ as the Day 1 scene in Bobbi Starrís training, and then download ď1100_Bobbi_SĒ as Day 2. The problem is that unless you rename the files as you go, the Bobbi in day 1 might not be Bobbi Starr, and if youíre sorting your files numerically youíre apt to get Day 1 and Day 2 mixed up. In most instances, modelís last names arenít included as part of the file. I think a file-naming standard that captured the shoot number, modelís full name and day of the shoot would work much better.

The lack of a search function and odd naming are bad enough when dealing with the traditional multi-day shoots, but organizing some of the multi-girl, multi-day shoots is a lot of work.

While this sounds like Iím being overly fussy, keep in mind that TTOO goes out of itís way to produce multi-day shoots. These are amazing, but grouping the whole shoot together is a lot of work and their own file names make organizing the files difficult.

Other more minor concerns are the lack of tags. Iím not saying that they need tags for everything, but for narrow, specific and hard to find niches they could work. Finally, while rare, there are missing scenes. The training scenes lose continuity when a day is missing.

The bottom line is this: when you weigh the good things about TTOO against the things that need improvement there is no contest. This is compelling, unique porn with stunning models in high-quality scenes. The negatives pale in comparison. If you have even a passing interest in BDSM Iíd highly recommend a membership.

08-27-12  04:39pm

Replies (0)
Comment
36
Visit Device Bondage

Device Bondage
(1)

Hardcore?

Can anybody tell me, how many scenes on average have actual m/f sex in them? Is there a way to search or filter for them? I only found filters for model type.

08-23-12  12:34am

Replies (3)
Review
37
Visit Device Bondage

Device Bondage
(1)

95.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 650+ videos
- Many big name stars appear
- Updates approximately every four days with the addition of a new scene
- Good variation in age, body type, tattoos/ no tattoos
- Variety of ways to download and view the videos
- Streaming is available
- Mp4 in two resolutions
- WMV in two resolutions
- Photos are available Ė usually broken down into Ďsetsí with set zips being offered
- Supports download managers with no obvious time-outs
Cons: - Probably a bit extreme for many
- Some may not like the price
Bottom Line: Full disclosure: I think Kink.com is likely the best online porn company in existence, but Iíll do my best to stay objectiveÖ

Obviously with any website if you donít have an interest in the material being offered then youíre likely not going to like it. That is especially true for a site like this where the material offered is definitely not mainstream porn. If you donít like extreme BDSM then you definitely wonít like this site, but I trust that you can still appreciate the effort that Kink puts into the scenes.

Device bondage is just that: the scenes all involve a female submissive being put into bondage by using various devices rather than more traditional ropes. Kink has amassed quite an impressive collection of implements to immobilize the models. Once immobilized the model is subjected to some further torment and in most cases there are forced orgasms. Actual sex does occur, but not in every shoot. Many of the Doms are females.

This may or may not be new since I last looked at this site, but I find that there are more big-name porn stars here. Amber Rayne appears to have shot a bunch of scenes in the past while and there are other stars that I wouldnít expect to see on an extreme BDSM site. Examples of this are Marie McCray, Sensi Pearl and Kaylee Hilton.

The scenes tend to follow a set formula: the scene begins with an interview where the viewers can see that this is 100% consensual. Then the scene is broken down into three segments so the girl isnít in one device for the entire scene. This adds a lot of variety and keeps the scenes from becoming dull. The interviews have been polarizing here at PU and Kink uses them on all their sites. I suspect that they do this more to appease the puritans and provide some measure of legal protection, but the frequent criticism of them is that including them at the first of the video can kill the sinister mood. I tend to agree with that and would prefer the interviews to be at the end or even as a separate file. But since theyíre easily skipped it isnít that big a deal.

As of this writing there are more than 650 scenes and updates are posted approximately every four days with one scene being added each time.

This could be a good or a bad thing, depending on how you view it, but the models on the site donít all look alike. There is a good mix of stars and lesser-knowns, ages range from 18+ to over 40. There are models with lots of tattoos and models without tattoos. The site seems to want to appeal to as broad an audience as possible.

Another Ďnewí element (which I may just have not noticed before) resolves one of the few complaints Iíve had about this site. I wish that theyíd include more behind-the-scenes material and show the model being put into the devices rather than just start with the model already restrained. The site has posted a few Ďliveí shoots where the cameras are left rolling as the model is put into the devices and the production staff communicates with members watching the show live. There arenít many of these live shoots, but it does give a glimpse into the inner workings of the site and I hope that the site continues to add them.

Being a Kink site, the technical bits are all up to or better than industry standards. Each scene has its own page and you can either stream or download the video. Downloads are available in either WMV or Mp4 format. Two resolutions are available for both formats. The highest resolution for both comes in at 1280x720. The bitrates are a bit different between the formats but both are approximately 7000kb/s. Both play at 30fps.

The site allows download managers and I didnít experience any of the links timing out. Download speeds are a bit faster than Iím used to at other sites.

Perhaps the one thing that many prospective members might take issue with is the price. I agree that price is important, but price has to be taken in context too. I think that the price, when weighed against the value of the site, is very fair: this isnít cookie-cutter porn. This is all exclusive, with mostly top-name models, in a dungeon-like building and excellent production values. Kink has some of the highest production values of any porn company and this stuff canít be cheap to make. If price is an issue, be sure to sign up for emails from them because they occasionally offer membership deals. Also, once youíre a member of one Kink site you get discounts on the other sites. An element to the value debate is that Kink isnít a Ďnetwork.í Each specific site requires a separate membership. Given the high production values and exceptionally high quality of the scenes on all of the sites, I donít think this detracts from the value.

Device Bondage continues to do almost everything very well, and since I was last a member there have even been a few improvements. Even at full price the site is a great value if you like whatís offered.

08-18-12  01:03pm

Replies (2)
Comment
38
Visit Sex And Submission

Sex And Submission
(1)

Great Kink

Great kink - very intense.

Does anyone know any other sites that are comparable in this genre?

07-31-12  08:13am

Replies (2)
Comment
39
Visit Public Disgrace

Public Disgrace
(2)

Love Talent and Quality

No body can touch the way kink does business. You can tell they are passionate about their work.

I like the concept of PD and I can suspend my disbelief - not everyone can. As is noted in plenty of places on PU their professionalism means that the scenes are contrived and controlled.

Still there's a lot to enjoy here. Great site - Great Talent

07-31-12  08:12am

Replies (0)
Comment
40
Visit Bound Gangbangs

Bound Gangbangs
(1)

Great shoots, high quality, good direction, hot girls!

Anything with Krissy Lynn and Sharah Shevron will get my attention. I may have to do a full review soon. These two shoots were very hot!

07-31-12  05:19am

Replies (0)
Review
41
Visit Everything Butt

Everything Butt
(1)

94.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Close to 200 scenes with weekly updates
-Very good 720p in mp4. Also available in smaller and more pakced formats. I only wish they had 1080p
-For a kink.com site this one has quite high production standards when it comes to make up and clothing on ladies. No morning faces for the sake of plotline, latex and other fetish wear is also regularly used
-Scenes are almost like two in one. First girl on girl anal play in fetish wear and then a guy on girl/girls hardcore sex
-Wide selection of shooting locations inside their Armory, toys, tools etc. These guys have the hardware it takes to run a site like this
-Techically works well, very good download speeds, fair and honest business without the dirty tricks you get used to with this industry. Good forums with active community
-More girls than guys in non lesbian scenes too
Cons: -Rather pricey like the Kink sites tend to be unless you wait for a special offer on their email list or get one from some other site
-When the guys enter, the scenes tend to lose the fetish focus and it all too often becomes "just another anal site" which is exactly what they claim not to be
-There is a stark change in the type of material they publish in early 2010 which is roughly halfway through the scenes so far so one may like some of their stuff while get nothing from the other half
-The site is quite bland with no good search available
-Photos are quite mediocre
Bottom Line: Everything Butt is a site which as it's name suggests, focuses on butts or more accurately buttholes. Well, even more accurately, stuffing things in them. The site features currently roughly 200 scenes which are mostly long and multi parted so the amount of content is not a prolem.

A typical scene lately starts with a short interview and then the action begins as girl/girl anal play, usually featuring latex or other fetish wear or some fantasy role play setting. This is all done well although the extremity of some scenes might not be for everyone. After the girl/girl action the scene usually cuts to where a guy enters and sadly all the fetish wear has usually somehow disappeared. The rest is more or less regular extreme anal sex, not too much different from what sites like Evil Angel offer. The good thing about regular content is that the scenes are kind of like two in one and there is almost always more girls in action than guys.

If you go back around halfway through the production, different kind of scenes start appearing however. There is more shorter scenes with only some solo insertion or bound enema play or scenes with only girl on girl action. It appears that the butt fetish focus was at some point switched to more generic anal sex focus. All the scenes on this site are available in 720p so the oldest ones are equal in quality to the newer ones.

The girls are mostly big names here, ones who are well known in American industry and also some East Europeans. Bobbi Starr, Amber Rayne, Krissy Lynn and such are regularly featured here, probably because everyone cannot handle what they do on this site. I like the fact that they are almost always wear proper make up here unlike on SexAndSubmission for example. As I metioned earlier, the latex is also a nice thing but sadly usually disappears when the guy enters.

The site as all kink.com sites can be considered somewhat pricey unless one finds a special offer on the kink.com itself or somewhere else. There is no network membership and buying single scenes with their on site currency is ridiculously expensive. The site works well enough even if it is quite simple and without very good search functions. Download speeds are great and if you forget about photos, the quality of content is too.

Despite the small issues, this site goes with my highest recommendations if the content suits your tastes.

07-12-12  12:36am

Replies (2)
Comment
42
Visit Kink On Demand

Kink On Demand
(0)

I don't understand it ?

I have joined many of the company's sites at KINK.COM.
But for some reason when I joined this last one Sex and Submissive Woman after 5 days they will not let me login in any more nor will they reply to any of my emails.
So how does one cancel a membership if you can not log in and cancel it.
I now have to cancel my credit card , very unprofessional and they will never see me back.
Be careful of this group !!!!

06-29-12  06:54am

Replies (5)
Comment
43
Visit Sex And Submission

Sex And Submission
(1)

Just don't understand it ?

I have joined many of the company's sites at KINK.COM.
But for some reason when I joined this last one Sex and Submissive Woman after 5 days they will not let me login in any more nor will they reply to any of my emails.
So how does one cancel a membership if you can not log in and cancel it.
I now have to cancel my credit card , very unprofessional and they will never see me back.
Be careful of this group !!!!

06-29-12  06:51am

Replies (0)
Rating
44
Visit Men In Pain

Men In Pain
(1)

93.0
No Review.
06-29-12  03:42am

Rating
45
Visit Divine Bitches

Divine Bitches
(2)

70.0
No Review.
06-28-12  05:29pm

Review
46
Visit Divine Bitches

Divine Bitches
(2)

94.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This is part of the Kink.com network of sites, so you can generally expect pretty high quality from them. Their videos range (depending on ho wold they are) in size and quality, but most are HD videos, or near that quality for some of the oldest stuff. Most everything I downloaded was around 300mb or higher mark, 640x360 mp4s. You have a choice between low, med, and high quality video downloads. Streaming is pretty solid here as well. Even when I have several video pages opening up the streams all come in pretty quick (faster than videobox).

Probably the biggest selling point is the star power. People like Bobbi and Aiden Starr are the standard at Kink.com. I am always amazed at the range of talent these women have. Very talented, very attractive stars in all their videos. There really isn't such a thing as a "bad" video at their site.

When I joined they were offering two for one specials and I also got a membership at meninpain.com.
Cons: The search within the Divine Bitches website works fine, but if you click on a star's name to see everything he/she has done it takes you to a listing of all of their kink.com work. If you click on a video from this page even for something they shot for Divine Bitches, it takes you a pay-per-view page rather than the actual Divine Bitches site. So that's a little annoying. You can still type Aiden Starr into the search in Divine Bitches and pull up her DB videos only and download them.

Kink.com likes to link to their other sites a lot. There no real chance of actually ordering something by accident in the pay-per-view, but they really do like to hype their other sites. It was a little alarming to me the first time I joined a kink.com site and it made me a little paranoid that I might accidentally join another site. This is not the case, I assure you.

They throw a lot at you on the start page. It can be a little overwhelming at times.
Bottom Line: Kink.com is a group you can usually trust, and also a group that seems to be setting the standards for fetish videos such as these (BDSM, femdom, latex, etc.). I scored Divine Bitches a 94 because a) there is always room for improvement and b) they could do soemthing to make navigation a little easier, mainly indexing the videos by star within the individual site, rather than all of kink.com. If they did that I could easily see myself giving this site a 98 (I can't ever see a site going much higher than that).

As far as recommendation goes, I have been a member in other kink.com sites and I can say they all seem to be pretty good. This site was one I hadn't really looked at before, and frankly I think it is one of their better sites. You get a nice range of femdom BDSM here that covers a variety of subjects (cuckolding, BDSM,ball torture, teasing, masturbation instruction, so on and so forth), whereas some of their other sites are more specific or focused in terms of the niche. I think if you are interested in any of the kink.com sites and don't know which one to try, this might be the safest bet.

06-25-12  11:08am

Replies (2)
Review
47
Visit TS Pussy Hunters

TS Pussy Hunters
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +All exclusif content.
+The only site that I'm aware that offers this type of fetish.
+You can stream videos online.
+You can download the videos in WMV and MP4. Basic resolution for the WMV is 720x576.
+They offer the HD version of all their videos.
+They have a nice selection of models from teens to more mature ones.
+Content is dated and they update with one new scene each friday.
Cons: -The site is tiny with only 12 scenes and they only update once a week so it will take many months before they have a decent amount of content.
-This is primarily a video site because you can't download the photoset in one zip file. They breakdown the scene into 3 or more section which can be downloaded as a single zip file.
-I don't normally put price as a negative but since this one is 35$ and there is currently only 12 videos then it's hard not to at least mention it.
Bottom Line: *I debated whether I should join now or wait until they had a lot more content because the site is expensive. I finally decided to join right away because I thought that if they don't get enough new members then it's going to be hard to justify to Kink that they need to make new scenes when they don't see anyone joining the site. Another huge reason is that I have never seen another site with this kind of content. I know that some will have the odd TS with a girl but these are often in the minority and they are mixed with amny scenes with TS with TS or TS with guys. The only kind of TS piorn that I watch is the one where the TS is having sex with a woman and the one doing the deed. I have no interest in seeing a TS receiving a strapon from the girl.

*The sex scenes are well shot, there is a little scenario to each of them and the chemistry is quite good between the women and the TS. The TS all have a decent hard-on and they know how to use their equipment. A major plus for me is that more than half of the scenes include the girls receiving anal penetration from the TS. Most of the scenes include a condom and I don't expect this to change because many TS shoot porn in the gay market or at least with gay performers. It would be next to impossible to hire performers that shoot porn in the hetero market to have sex with performers that shoot for the gay market.


**If you are into this type of fetish then you won't find any better than this site. Actually you probably won't find an other site. By default if you aren't into this type of porn then you should avoid.

**I'm not using the fact that the site has so little content in my score.

06-19-12  06:53am

Replies (3)
Review
48
Visit TS Seduction

TS Seduction
(0)

83.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: High quality shemale models
All TS models are active
All TS models cum in scenes
Consistent standard of scenes and models
Models speak English
Good quality HD video
Good amount of content
Cons: Some problems with log in, actually on some occasions got to the site and there was no log in button :S
Navigation is clumsy, and some features are difficult to find.
Quite a few clicks to get to a download, and select right quality.
Doesn't work very well with download manager (IDM), often links break and need refreshing.
Bottom Line: The scenes are of a great quality, have excellent models, good variety, and good action. However this is somewhat ruined by the navigation of the site and it not being very compatible with a download manager.

The girls on this site are predominantly active and dominant, and all the scenes I got through had cumshots from them, this is something I have found inconsistent on other shemale sites.

If you are not a fan of S&M fetish then I wouldn't let this element put you off, even though it features heavily it doesn't distract from what are essentially very high quality tranny sex scenes. (I'm not a huge fan of S&M or domination myself but still enjoyed the site

Overall I would recommend a months subscription to shemale fans as there is plenty of good action on offer, just be prepared for a few annoyances when using the site

06-12-12  12:50pm

Replies (1)
Review
49
Visit Fucking Machines

Fucking Machines
(0)

88.0
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Video quality is outstanding
Large selection of videos and photos going back several years
Girls are very attractive, friendly, intelligent, and well adjusted.
Interview of the girls before using the machines allows viewer to get to know the each girl and how they feel about their experience. In virtually all cases, the girls are eager to get started and seem very happy afterwards.
Membership cost is very reasonable
Trial memberships with full access are available making this an even greater bargain.

Regular updates
Cons: The format of a girl getting pleased by an electronic dildo can get boring after a while. There are over a dozen other sites on the Kink network that are more interesting.
Photo quality is not emphasized on this site.
No extra sites included in membership
Download files are extremely large. You will need a fast connection to avoid waiting.
Bottom Line: If I had to name the top five networks on the internet right now, Kink would definitely be included on the list. It features an amazing assortment of high quality bondage sites, featuring top notch production quality, and gorgeous extremely positive and motivated amateurs. Fucking Machines is one the sites included in the Kink network. Unfortunately, when you subscribe to one you do not get access to the others. However, this should not deter you from joining the site. The quality here is unsurpassed by virtually any other porn site of any other kind on the net. The only downside to this particular site is that watching video after video of a girl getting plugged by an electronic machine can get boring after a while.

06-05-12  01:27am

Replies (1)
Comment
50
Visit The Upper Floor

The Upper Floor
(0)

Enjoyed it, but not what I expected

I would have reviewed this site, but because of job duties ended up missing the last two weeks of my membership. Admittedly, I wouldn't have joined this site if not for a promo Kink sent to join it at a much reduced price.

My feeling with this site is that it wasn't what I expected. As someone who isn't really into BDSM, but love Kink's "live" content, I was left with the feeling that this site would be much better for those who love BDSM, but are less into the live part. There is a voyeuristic feel to the content as well as exhibitionist, but some of the BDSM was just a little more than I can enjoy and the live parts aren't like the other Kink sites where a live crowd is brought in to watch.

I could be wrong there. The scenes generally revolve around a group of dressed people doing casual things like eating, cleaning, while a dom or doms, dominate a sub or subs, right in front of them. Where I could be wrong in this not being an actual live audience of normal people is that the "guests" are dressed as if they are at a social event. I think my believability factor is being pushed here. I can't imagine a group of everyday people going out and plunking down cash for a thousand or two thousand dollar outfit to watch someone be dominated, but again, I could be wrong. It's hard for me to see myself doing that so of course it makes it less believable for me.

On Ultimate Surrender's live shoots the crowd is a group of normally dressed people in t-shirts, jeans, shorts and while those are likely planned as well, with crowd/performers interaction, I find it more believable.

Not to down this site because I've never seen a bad Kink site. As always, the content is very high quality technically and in creativity. If I get another promo to it, I will definitely give it another go, but I can't see paying the non-promo price for it. Would definitely recommend it for those who like BDSM and even more of a recommendation if they like voyeurism and exhibitionism. The best compliment I can give is that I think the site is a bit ahead of its time. The other reason I wouldn't review it is I didn't even get a chance to try out the live cams or raw footage sections.

05-14-12  05:03pm

Replies (0)

Shown : 26-50 of 210 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.21 seconds.