Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Webmaster Profile A detailed history of activity from this webmaster in all different categories.
Webmaster : khf2004 (1)

View Feedback:   Replies (2)         Other:   Site Feedback (38)   |   Replies Received (1)

Incoming Feedback All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites.
Shown : 1-18 of 18  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Comment
1
Visit Young Models

Young Models
(0)

Old videos continue to be released as new.

I'm sad to say that 6 months after my last report, it appears that probably none of the sites in this group have any new videos. They continue to label old videos as new updates. At YoungModels, the latest "updates" were Felicia Flynt "Added May 10, 2010", Renee "Added May 3, 2010", and Madison Monroe "Added April 26, 2010". I had downloaded all of these in June, 2009. On to some bonus sites. At Interracial Sluts, recent "updates" were Christie Lee "March 25, 2010" and Lisa Marie "February 24, 2010". I had downloaded these in March, 2009. At Creampie Fucking, Lorena Sanchez "May 5, 2010" I had downloaded in March, 2009. At Amateur Couples, I found Dana Marie & Tony "April 27, 2010" and Kasey Kox & Johnny "April 13, 2010", which I had downloaded in March, 2009. In conclusion, while these sites have some worthwhile videos, they are apparently a fixed set with no real updates. I'm knocking 10 points off the score of my review. Well, I would if I could. I'm up against the PU rule that you can't edit a review more than 6 months old. Seems to me this is a case where I should be able to!

05-10-10  07:14pm

Replies (2)
Comment
2
Visit Cute Couples

Cute Couples
(0)

Seems to have stopped updating

Duke just posted a review on this site and I had been a member several years ago and posted a prior comment on this site. Since my last comment in 2008 (and stretching my memory) it looks like only a few updates have been added in the last few years. I doubt very much that they are adding anything new or, if they are adding updates, that they're probably recycled. Not a great site to begin with (certainly not worth the price of $30 a month) but I'd probably write this one off as a permanent "no go" if in fact they have stopped updating.

02-03-10  12:07pm

Replies (0)
Comment
3
Visit Young Models

Young Models
(0)

Old videos released as new.

I returned to this site in November, hoping for some good new boy/girl videos. I was surprised and disappointed to find many old videos that I had downloaded months earlier being represented as updates in October or November! Many of those videos are quite good (to my taste) but still, it is dishonest to represent them as new. Destiny & Drifter, "added Nov 23, 2009", Madison & Derrick "added Nov 16, 2009", and Sabrina & Lucky, "added Oct 20, 2009": I had downloaded these videos when I was a member in June, 2009! Even worse, I had downloaded videos featuring Ginger, Sammy Cruz, and Aubrey (represented as recently added) in March, 2009. Although I kept no record of the site from which these were downloaded, the video filenames begin with "ym_" for YoungModels. Also, YoungModels is releasing content from their other sites, e.g. MacKenzie and Daisy/Nick which I had downloaded in March from AmateurCouples. That would be OK if they were not labeled as exclusive content. As you can tell from my review, I thought this was one of the better sites, so I am really disappointed to see what is happening there.

12-02-09  05:28pm

Replies (0)
Comment
4
Visit Young Models

Young Models
(0)

Hmmmm

It is still a shame that it takes intervention from Khan and Co to get a satisfactory repsonse.

So firm are still a little too dodgy for my liking.

10-26-09  11:34am

Replies (0)
Comment
5
Visit Young Models

Young Models
(0)

Erroneous Charges Refunded!

This is the followup to my previous comment about YoungModels titled "Warning: Fraudulent/Erroneous Charges!". Immediately upon complaining, I received a direct email response from a YoungModels staffer, who is also a PU member, khf2004. He promptly refunded the two erroneous monthly charges to my Visa account, and the erroneous membership was canceled. Further, he gave me a bonus gift. Therefore, I consider that this error was resolved promptly, courteously, professionally, and to my full satisfaction.

10-02-09  09:54am

Replies (2)
Comment
6
Visit Young Models

Young Models
(0)

Warning: Fraudlent/Erroneous Charges!

I subscribed to this site on 6/13/09 and canceled on 6/16/09. My membership was good thru 7/12/09. I was billed for one month ($29.95) in June, by cybersecurepayment.com. Other names used by this site are slickcash, netbilling, elecbillpayment. I was not billed for this site in July. In late September, I noticed that I had been billed on 8/21/09 and 9/20/09 by CMD-AZ.NET, $39.95 each time. I went to http://cmd-az.net and sent an email complaining. They responded that I have an active membership in YoungModels.Com! I then went to cybersecurepayment.com and was able to locate my original membership account, which confirmed that I had canceled it within the first month. Today I have sent a snapshot of the cancellation confirmation both to CMD-AZ.NET and to cs@slickcash.com (which sent me an email confirming my request to cancel in June). I am awaiting their responses. A SATISFACTORY RESPONSE WAS RECEIVED RESOLVING THIS MATTER -- PLEASE SEE MY SUBSEQUENT COMMENT.

09-28-09  08:05pm

Replies (4)
Review
7
Visit Young Models

Young Models
(0)

86.0
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Occasional vids with horny young girls who forget they're on camera (or like it) and come and come and come.
- Directing does not get in the way of real arousal and chemistry when it happens.
- Pretty young girls, some handsome young guys.
- Good videography, well lit, some closeups but they don't go on too long. Mostly you can see whole bodies.
- Special $20/month (NETBilling), recurring, cancellation easy.
- Full access to all 12 of their sites for one fee.
- I downloaded wmv; not sure if they offer other formats.
- I had no problem with downloading speed, seemed smooth and reliable.
- Photo sets available as well as vids, but I didn't pay much attention to photos b/c I prefer videos.
Cons: - Most of the vids are standard fare with no female orgasms, no chemistry, nobody having fun or getting aroused -- just fast HC banging. You have to look hard to find the few wonderful gems listed below.
- Resolution is good but not HD.
Bottom Line: - Resolution is good but not great, mostly 640 x 480 pixels, some on Creampies were 480 x 360. Most files I downloaded were 200 - 250 megabytes.

What I liked a great deal about YM is that I was able to find a few scenes where amateur-looking girls were very horny, seemed to forget (or enjoy) that they were on camera, and just came and came and came. My favorite was Sabrina, a tiny brunette who came with oral, jumps into a vigorous CG coming in about 3 minutes, and again in a couple more minutes. She is definitely using the guy! Next she comes in mish and at least twice again in K9. End is a disappointing tired jack off on her face. Sabrina has a large vine tattooed wrapped around one leg, which I found quite hot.

Another favorite is Ginger. I've seen this blonde model on other sites, but here she really comes hard, first to oral, then to CG and RCG, then she pumps away in K9 but doesn't seem to come, then comes in mish. This ends a little better with the guy withdrawing and immediately coming over her tits.

Other gorgeous comealot girls are Sammy (tho she has an ugly tattoo), and readhead Brandimay, who has a cute giggly personality.

A subscription to YM includes access to a bunch of other sites: AmateurCouples, DrippingCreampies, Interracial, ButtBunnies, DPBabes, GapingGirls, MomsASlut, LesbianTraining, SweetPinkHoles, SuckThatDick, and StripTeaseThenFuck. Not being into anal or g/g, I didn't visit all of these. I found scenes that I liked a lot at the first three.

Dripping Creampies (videos are labeled CreampieFucking): Denisa is a gorgeous model who really enjoyed the sex and appeared to me to be multiorgasmic, tho quiet about it. Barbie Cummings has a nice short scene where the guy comes in a normal (short) amount of time. Lorena's scene has a great throbbing dick closeup, coming inside, as do those with Nikki and Stacey.

At Interracial (videos are labeled InterracialSlut), Lisa Marie, Christie, and Brooke (all white) are multiorgasmic and fun.

At AmateurCouples (videos are labeled AmateurCouplesSex), there's good chemistry, affection, and cumming aplenty in Heather (Silky) and Rick, Missy and Dave, and MacKenzie and Noah.

BOTTOM LINE: While there is not much real arousal or excitement or fun in most of the videos at these sites, there are enough gems (listed above) that I found a one-month subscription well worthwhile. Those gems illustrate how it is possible, when the director doesn't interfere too much, for the rare horny porn stars with personality and couples who like sex and exhibitionism to be genuinely aroused and erotic. If your tastes agree with mine (see my profile, and the forum thread "Against the grain"), you'll know just which scenes to download first.

These sites also have photo sets, but I'm not into static photos much so I didn't pay much attention to those.

07-29-09  10:26am

Replies (0)
Comment
8
Visit Cum Shot Blast

Cum Shot Blast
(0)

Nope

Looks like every other facial site. Chick smiling with a teaspoon of cum in her mouth. I hate facials and I really hate sites that are mislabeled. This is hardly a CS Blast. It is a Cumshot pewpew

01-10-09  10:11pm

Replies (0)
Comment
9
Visit Cute Couples

Cute Couples
(0)

Probably Not Worth It

I joined this site about 18 months ago. My experience then was that the usual 3rd party content was probably better than the site. The pics were small and most of the couples were not very cute. The vids were average at best. The site advertises as an amateur sex site but some of the models have done other porn shoots. I downloaded only a little and saved even less.

I recently looked at the site and it looks like updates are very few and very far between (only about 10 more sets added since I joined). Unless you're really into amatuer porn I would probably pass on this one.

05-27-08  06:36pm

Replies (0)
Comment
10
Visit Break Her Hymen

Break Her Hymen
(0)

Makes you wonder

It kind of makes you wonder how sites like these can get away with what I'll call false advertising. Many of these girls (erm I mean women) are not virgins by a long shot!

10-18-07  08:50pm

Replies (2)
Comment
11
Visit Break Her Hymen

Break Her Hymen
(0)

Don't use MILFS...

LOL one of the girls on the video previews had mommy marks on her belly! She's a hottie but trying to pass her as a virgin Please stop. A decade ago thats being kind drrange, those cherry's are dust many moons ago. This site is trying to sell sweet fresh cherry pie with hot pork gravy dressing. It don't sell unless your deaf dumb and blind with no taste buds. PornUsers should start a dummy book for porn producers. These guys could be the test study on the do's and don't.

10-18-07  03:45pm

Replies (1)
Comment
12
Visit Break Her Hymen

Break Her Hymen
(0)

Give me a break.

Perused this to see what's up but not to buy. Saw that Lucy Lee (the Asian one) was on the site. She's a prolific pornstar and these weren't any old pictures.

Her hymen was busted a decade ago. What a fraud this site is.

10-18-07  12:14pm

Replies (0)
Comment
13
Visit DP Babes

DP Babes
(0)

Contradiction In Terms?

Ok, this is one really makes no sense to me. In the description for this one, which would have the full title of "Double Penetration Babes", it is listed at being an amateur site (see my previous comments for my feeling on this one), but the more shocking descriptor is "Soft Content". What? How can a site where a girl lets two guys penetrate her at once possibly be soft?

I gave it the benefit of the doubt figuring that someone may get off on something like that being implied and not shown, but even the tour shows the penetration without any little blurry spots to make it R rated as opposed to XXX. I understand the problem figuring out if a site is amateur, I really do. However, how can a site like this possibly be described as soft content?

06-30-07  03:13pm

Replies (2)
Comment
14
Visit Sweet Pink Holes

Sweet Pink Holes
(0)

strange billing

I entered from TBP to this site SPH,tried to join but the
price is not $19.95 USD (DISCOUNT from your site to the TBP
users)the price is $435 MX!!? P/MONTH??!
I don't know what happened.

04-21-07  12:12pm

Replies (7)
Review
15
Visit Dripping Cream Pies

Dripping Cream Pies
(0)

63.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The girls are hot; videos are cool. Not much to comment about.
Cons: I watched some of the clips through a streaming pay per view site. I didn't bother to watch the whole clips. So based on what I've seen, I won't subscribe to the site until they can shoot the videos properly - just my taste.

This site seems to copy allinternal.com (how they shot their videos). Starts with a girl in the middle teasing and stripping, then playing with her pussy and sucking a dildo. Then more likely a guy coming in already completely nude with a HARDON ready.
Bottom Line: Continuing... Basically guys are not very important as in many straight porn movies.

I would prefer to see normal boy-girl scene, with process of undressing (no editing), fondling or foreplay first, maybe playing with tits, then oral cunnilingus and fellatio. Fucking increases with speed until the guy pops inside. I prefer the guy shooting without hesitation, either keep fucking deep and fast. No need to show dripping pussy, just show they are satisfied-kissing each other and so on.

01-16-07  04:49am

Replies (0)
Review
16
Visit Striptease Then Fuck

Striptease Then Fuck
(0)

71.0
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: This is a good site of simple hardcore sex. The models are hot and so is the sex. The models aren't strippers, so don't expect the best. Vids are divided into MPEG clips that play in mediocre quality.
Cons: Even more Mark Wood. Same content/models from other network sites. There aren't enough episodes to justify the price, nor are there many updates.
Bottom Line: Good content on this one. Similar content found among the other network sites. Don't join for just this site, take advantage of all of them.

01-12-07  01:22pm

Replies (0)
Review
17
Visit All Threesomes

All Threesomes
(0)

72.0
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: This site gives you exactly what it looks like it would. 3-somes, mostly f/f/m. Which is great. This site offers mediocre vid content with hot models. You get 2 per scene. Great. Not many pics, just vid caps. Network access to about 12 sites is great.
Cons: Too much Mark Wood. Not many scenes. Needs some more work. I would even reccommend some more non-exclusive downloadable content. No updates in a while. Vid quality could be better(MPEG).
Bottom Line: Not the best 3-some site, but woth a look. Hot girls, decen vid, but poor pic galleries. Network access is a plus of course, but not for $39.95.

01-12-07  01:12pm

Replies (0)
Review
18
Visit Dripping Cream Pies

Dripping Cream Pies
(0)

83.0
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: TPB didn't like this one as much as I did. But I'm a huge Creampie fan. Like most sites of it's kind, there is HUGE bonus in its network accessability. The content is exclusive, and the vid quality is outstanding. The models are beautiful, and get fucked hard, with a little left over. Pics galleries are just as great.
Cons: There could be a bit more vids for the price. $29.95. With some time, this site will be even greater. Updates were coming once a week, but I think are less frequent now.
Bottom Line: All in all, this is a great Creampie site. If this is your niche, then this is your site. Hot models, downloadable vids, HQ pics. This site costs a bit for only about 38 videos, but when you see the other “Reality Video” sites, you'll appreciate the money you spent.

01-12-07  01:00pm

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-18 of 18  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.75 seconds.