Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : hogboy (1)  

Feedback:   All (6)  |   Reviews (2)  |   Comments (2)  |   Replies (2)

Other:   Replies Received (3)  |   Trust Ratings (6)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-2 of 2  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Rating
1
Visit Fucked Hard 18

Fucked Hard 18
(1)

85.0
No Review.
06-11-09  12:46pm

Review
2
Visit Net Video Girls

Net Video Girls
(0)

60.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The premise is great; get naive girls into your 'studio' to pose for a calendar, and gradually persuade them to take their clothes off and have sex. There are a lot of scenes, most of the girls are cute, and their reactions look genuine. Plus, the camera man isn't your usual overweight sleezebag. Although you don't see him often, on the few occasions when you do he looks normal enough, and you can believe that the girls would want to fuck him.
Cons: The site design is antiquated. There's no search facility, no photo sets, and the video quality is terrible by today's standard. The site goes back to 2000, and you could forgive the quality on some of the early movies, but to be turning out poor-looking 480x360 and calling that "high quality" is a joke. The other real issue is that a large number of the download links simply don't work. I did report this, although there were way too many to report individually (I'd guess at about 30% of the total number). I did get a swift response, but the issue itself wasn't resolved.
Bottom Line: It's still one of my favourite sites from the last few years, but to get a good score the broken links would need to be fixed and the video quality would need to improve - if not HD, then good quality SD should easily be possible. I enjoy netvideogirls, but the bottom line is "buyer beware."

09-18-11  10:38am

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-2 of 2  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.48 seconds.