Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : lk2fireone (194)  

Feedback:   All (1985)  |   Reviews (83)  |   Comments (266)  |   Replies (1636)

Other:   Replies Received (1124)  |   Trust Ratings (75)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 97 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(9)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Low intro price of $9.95 first month, recurring $29.95/monthly.
-Loads of attractive models.
-Wide variety of models. You get some content of your popular porn stars, and loads other girls as
well.
-Fast download speeds. I get over 2MB/sec, which is close to my max download speed.
-Easy login. No captcha.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout (I just got timed out. Lost my place. So this site is not as generous as some in site timeout.)
-Professionally shot videos. Good lighting, good colors, good focus, good sound control, etc.
-Lots of niches covered.
-Easy navigation. But there are so many attractive models, you get tired looking through the videos, trying to decide which to view.
-Lots of viewing options. Can stream, or download in different definitions.
-Zip file for photosets.
-Content is basically exclusive.
Cons: -The cons are basically minor.
-The $9.95 for first month is a great bargain for a great network. But renewing at $29.95/month
makes you wonder about renewing.
-There is a pre-checked cross-sell, but it was easy to see and uncheck.
-Initial signup was a little strange. I was rejected 4 times when I tried to use a Master card to sign up. I switched to a Visa card and was accepted the first time.
-For some videos, I get the message: "A plugin is needed to display this content". Most videos will
stream, but a few don't.
-The ultra high quality video files can be large. 1.4 GB for a runtime of 32 minutes.
-The search box returns can be buggy sometimes. You enter "Mia Malkova", who has 2 videos and 2
matching photosets, and the search returns, "Your search - Mia Malkova - did not match any documents." The search box is supposed to search the entire network, not just the site you are currently logged in to.
-The default filename is a random number.
Bottom Line: The site/network is easy to use, once you get over how many models and videos and photosets there are. It should be a real pleasure going through the high quality contents of attractive women doing dirty sex. But the sheer magnitude of the contents-strangely-almost makes it seem like work.

Sites like X-Art and Diesel Access network, while far smaller, just seem easier to use, because,
psychologically, you know there's less material. And I like or appreciate the models at X-Art and
Diesel Access network more. The videos at those sites seem more intimate, the approach is more
glamcore/heartcore. I don't mean the 21SexTury videos are gonzo. But the models at 21Sextury appear more hardcore pros, while the models at the other two sites I mentioned just seem to give a softer, more real vibe to their performances.

-The best things about this network/site: A large number of lovely models. The videos are crystal
sharp, well focused, good lighting, professionally shot, good colors.
-What is unusual, is that the accompanying photosets are really high quality. The photos are taken by professional photographers who know what they are doing. So you have high quality photos of lovely young models in sexual situations.

Most of the sites focus on a particular niche. At other networks, there might be little attempt to focus the content. But this network makes an effort to supply content specific to the theme of the site.

-Can view the photos online, or download the photoset in a zip file.
-The photoset zip files give two options: normal, and high resolution definitions. (Older photosets
might have just a normal definition zip file).
-Photosets have 100+ photos per set.

-Can stream or download the videos.
-Video runtime averages 30+ minutes per video.
Older videos give you a choice of medium or high definition for download.
Newer videos give you more choices for definition for download:
Low quality H.264
Medium quality wmv
Medium quality H.264
High quality wmv
Ultra high quality wmv
Ultra high quality H.264

-You can download the entire video, or can select partial scenes from the video for download.

-With so many sites (you get access to 39 sites), and so many models, and so many videos and photosets to examine, it's easy to feel overwhelmed. Just bite the bullet, and keep looking, and you will almost certainly find models and videos and photosets that will appeal.

The introductory price of $9.95 for the first month (recurring at $29.95/month thereafter) makes this a real bargain. I don't know why I haven't tried this site before.

05-20-13  06:31pm

Replies (5)
Review
2
Visit Young Libertines

Young Libertines
(1)

68.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Some improvement in video qaulity over Young Sex Parties, a sister site in the Serious Cash network. But video quality seems amateurish which is not a plus, unless you like to watch poorly shot home sex videos.
-Easy login. Can save username and password for future logins.
-No DRM.
=Long time before site timeout.
-They have videos of some models that appear to be early in their career. I've seen some of these models at other sites. But the names they use for the models are basically random, having no relation to the names these models have at other sites.
-Down Them All download manager works.
-Good download speeds. I regularly get slightly over 2 MB/sec, which is close to my max download speed.
-Can stream or download movies.
Download choices are FLV, MP4, 3GP (for mobile phones).
Cons: -I believe joining this network means your email address will be opened to lots of spam. Open a new email address for safety.
-Videos have a home-style, amateur feel.
-Search is poor. Many times you can enter a model's name and get 0 results, even though you copied her name from a video you just saw, where her name is listed.
-Advertising for other sites clutters up the members area pages.
-Videos download with generic filenames such as "movie.flv" or "high.mp4", so you have to rename the videos manually to identify who is in the video. But the model's names are generic, so unless you recognize her from other sites and remember her name, the name of a model is almost worthless.
-No list for models' names at the site. No listing of models' thumbnails to show what the models look like.
-No model bios.
-Models are foreign (Russia or from Eastern Europe). So the language spoken in the videos is usually foreign.
-Navigation is poor
Bottom Line: The site theme is supposed to be amateur videos that are shot at home by amateurs.

There are a few videos I've seen from this site that I thought were good. But trying to search through the site to find those videos is a time-consuming task, because the search function is crap, there is no listing of models with a thumbnail to identify what the models look like, the names given to the models are apparently random, so even if you know what you are looking for, it's a question of whether you will run out of patience before you find it.

This site is a little better than Young Sex Partes because I think the models are a little more attractive. But the videos don't compare to the high quality videos found at quality teen sites. And the videos are also below the general quality of videos at Teen Mega World -in terms of focus, framing, definition, lighting, costumes, etc. I know they are going for an amateur feeling, but I much prefer professionally shot videos that have high quality.

The site design is poor, making site navigation a problem. This site makes you begin to appreciate how easy some other sites are to use. Where search is useful, where you get nice thumbnails to show you what the models look like (along with a name you can use).

You get about 21 sites included in your membership. Most of the sites feature teen hardcore.

The sites included are:
Teeny Lovers
Casual Teen Sex
18 Pussy Club
Young Sex Parties
I Shoot My Girl
Young Libertines
Bang My Teen Ass
18 Flesh
Sell Your GF
Hidden Camera Tapes
Girls Next Door Abused
Young Courtesans
Teens Analyzed
Home Porno Tapes
Moms Passions
My Dirty GF
Nasty Angels
Old Dicks Young
Porn Films 3D
Stolen Home Films
Teen Teacher
They Caught On Video

I'm giving the site a score of 68. The site navigation is a problem. I don't care for the amateur feel of the videos. I wish the models were more attractive, or at least presented more attractively. I think there are much better sites available, in terms of how easy the sites are to use, the quality of the contents. The network has lots of hardcore videos (and pictures), so the quantity is good, but it's too difficult to slog through the content to find what I would like.

My score of 68 is based on the amount of content at the network. If I were grading this site on my personal enjoyment of the site, I would give it a score in the 50s.

05-13-13  11:01pm

Replies (0)
Review
3
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(4)

95.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -One of my favorite glamcore sites.
-The selection of models is outstanding. Most of the models are either attractive or gorgeous.
The photography and videos focus on making the models as attractive as possible, and it really shows.
-Easy login. Username and password can be saved. No captcha required.
-Good site design. Can search site by updates, models, or videos.
-Large thumbnails clearly show what the models look like, what models are in each video or photoset.
-Long time before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-Content has date posted to site.
-No download limits.
-Fast download speeds. I get over 2.1 MB/sec, which is close to my max download speed.
-Download manager works. I use DownThemAll.
-Videos and photo sets are professionally shot. Excellent lighting, good colors, good sound control (no random extraneous noises), most of the photos and videos are well-focused.
-Good update rate. Last couple of weeks, they have been adding one video or photoset per day.
Cons: -The cons are basically minor. This is one of the best glamcore sites available. I'm basing that on the quality of the models (attractive to absolutely gorgeous), the high quality of the videos and photosets, how easy the site is to use).
-No search function if want to search by type of sex action, hair color of model, breast size, or other factors.
-If you don't like glamcore (some PU members call this heartcore), you won't like this site. There is no gonzo sex, no rough treatment of women.
-Many of the videos have brief moments where the video is slighty blurry. This is an "artistic effect", which I find stupid and annoying. I want my videos crystal clear, not crystal clear, with occasional blurry shots mixed in.
-Glamcore usually has soft "mood music" in the background. I prefer a video without any "mood music" or any background music.
-Models are white, late teens to early 20s. Some PU members might want a wider variety of models, different races, more of an age spread.
Bottom Line: This is one of the best glamcore sites on the Internet. The models range from merely attractive to drop-dead gorgeous. The videos and photosets are high quality, professionally shot, to emphasize the beauty of the models. The sex is slow, sensuous, romantic.

There is a mix of solo, boy-girl, girl-girl. There are a few with 2 boys-1 girl, 1 boy-2 girls, 2 boys-2 girls.

I believe the site contents are exclusive. Although many of the models can be found at other sites, the videos and photosets at the site are exclusive.

There is a nice amount of content. The site has been around a number of years (2009 or earlier?). It used to be called "Beauty is Divine". When it first started, it was strictly a softcore teen glamor site. I don't believe it had any videos, only photosets. Each photoset had a small number of photos, and the models were uniformly lovely. The photography was high quality. Then the site name was changed to X-Art, and they started adding videos, and changing the approach from softcore to erotic glamor, which slowly evolved to glamcore, where the photosets and videos show actual sex.

Photosets can be viewed online, or downloaded.
Photosets from the last few years have about 100+ photos per set.
The earliest photosets had 25 or fewer photos per set.
Download options include a zip file in three definitions:
1200 pixels
2000 pixels
4000 pixels

Videos can be streamed online or downloaded.
Download options have choice of many definitions:
The download choices for one recent video include:
MP4 (all devices and mobile)
1920x1080 HD (1431 MB)
1280x720 HD (784 MB)
960x540 SD (549 MB)
640x360 SD (152 MB)
Apple Quicktime
1920x1080 HD (1431 MB)
1280x720 HD (784 MB)
960x540 SD (549 MB)
640x360 SD (152 MB)
Windows Media
1920x1080 HD (1478 MB)
1280x720 HD (867 MB)
960x540 SD (589 MB)
640x360 SD (158 MB)

BOTTOM LINE:
If you like tender young teens, in gorgeously photographed photos and videos, then this site is worth visiting.
As I said, this is one of my favorite glamcore teen sites.

05-06-13  06:33pm

Replies (6)
Review
4
Visit Wow Porn

Wow Porn
(1)

92.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Easy login. No captcha.
-Long time before site timeout.
-High quality videos and photosets. Professionally shot: good lighting, good colors, good sound control, really nice technical control.
-Large number of attractive or gorgeous teen models.
-Easy site navigation.
-Can stream or download videos.
-Streaming options: 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-Download options: 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-You can select different parts of a video scene to stream or download.
-Nice mix of solo, boy-girl, girl-girl, or group sex.
-There is usually background music for the videos, but it's kept soft, so less distracting
than many music backgrounds.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
Cons: PROS (CONTINUED):
-Good download speeds. I usually get over 2MB/sec, which is close to my max download
speed.
-Access to live chat shows that feature a few of the models from the Diesel sites. The models are friendly, strip, masturbate, sometimes have a boyfriend that performs with them (fucking, in other words). Those shows are completely free.
-Content has a posting date.
-Files download with the name of the model and the title of the video, so you don't have
to rename the files.

CONS
Cons are basically minor. Wow Porn is a high quality glamcore site.
-Most of the videos are shot indoors. very few videos are shot outdoors, at the beach, in a park or field. Some people might want more variety in the locations, but I thought the locations were very nice, no cheap apartment setting, no cheap clothing, just a really nice look and feel to the videos.
-Sometimes toys are used. Some PU members don't like toys.
-This is a glamcore site. Some PU members might like a more gonzo approach.
Bottom Line: Wow Porn and Wow Girls are the newest sites in the Diesel Access network. Starting in early March of 2013, those two sites, which used to be separate from the Diesel Access network, are now included in the network.

I would consider 18 Only Girls, Young Legal Porn, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn to be glamcore/heartcore porn. Those sites use many of the same models. The video and photo style is basically the same for all 4 sites. You get gorgeous teen models that show off their tight bodies, and many of them engage in hardcore sex, with boys, with other girls, or by themselves (some PU members consider masturbation softcore or midcore, but I think it's hardcore, especially if they are showing close-up views of the vagina, ass, etc.)

The videos and photos are high quality, in terms of definition, focus, lighting, colors, camera-work, etc.

My favorite glamcore/heartcore sites are X-Art and some of the Diesel Access network sites. That's because of the high quality videos and photosets, and the large number of very attractive to really gorgeous models these sites have.

Met-art is my favorite teen softcore glamor site. Again, that is because of the huge number of very attractive to really gorgeous models, and the outstanding quality of their photosets.

If you have access to all the sites in the Diesel Acess network, that means 11 sites in all. They have dropped (eliminated) several of the old sites that stopped updating years ago, and that mainly contained older, lower quality videos and photos (lower definition, lower production values). So they are showcasing the higher quality of their current offerings.

The sites they have eliminated include:
Lay The Kat
Policeman
Sasha Fucks Dasha
The Sperm Lover

Wow Porn is an excellent site by itself. Access to the rest of the sites in the network make this a high quality glamcore offering with lots of very attractive teen models.

It's really hard to give this site a fair score. By itself, I'm giving it a 92. If you include the other sites in the network, I'd give it a 95 or more. This is really a high-end glamcore offering.

04-24-13  08:11pm

Replies (3)
Review
5
Visit Silvia Saint

Silvia Saint
(1)

88.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Site has a faq on how Silvia Saint got into the porn business, a little on her history.
It's straight-forward facts, not a lot of bullshit.
-Site also has a bio page, with short facts on her personal history and physical likes.
-Part of the netFameSolutions network. One of the main sites in the network, based on quantity of content, quality of content.
-Silvia Saint is a very attractive blonde, blue-eyed model, great shape,
-PU discount $14.95/month (recurring).
-This site tries to be more accurate, or factual, than the normal porn site. In videos, if
the model is interviewed, she gives her actual age, rather than trying to appear as a teenager. In the categories page, they list 5 scenes at Teen: 5 scenes out of 737 total scenes at the site.
-Models mainly appear natural. Not a lot of implants. The girls with big breasts appear to
be natural, not plastic.
Cons: PROS (CONTINUED):
-In the interviews, the girls come across as real people, not putting on airs, not using a lot of fake moans and groans and fake excitement when they masturbate.
-Can watch scenes streaming or download.
-Videos have posting date.
-Female models are listed for each scene.
-Includes network access to the netFameSolutions network, which has massive, good quality DVDs covering many categories.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Good download speeds. I regularly got about 2.06MB/sec, which is close to my maximum
download speed (My max download speed is about 2.16 MB/sec).
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Lots of attractive models.
-Easy login.
-Same username and password work for all the sites in the network you have access to. Or
you can use the dropdown box to switch among your bonus sites.
Bottom Line: CONS:
-Pre-checked cross-sell at signup.
-Many blank thumbnails for the model listings.
-No low-cost longer term (3 month or more) membership option.
-No zip files for photo shoots.
-I don't like their software mechanism for viewing the photos online. The viewer seems slow and clunky to switch from one pic to the next.
-Have to use drop-down lists to select model, category, scene. A simple blank search box would be easier to use, more flexible to use (if they paid a site designer to implement a software search system).


BOTTOM LINE:

Silvia Saint is one of the major porn stars. She was Penthouse Pet of the Year in 1996 in the Czech edition. She has probably appeared in over 300 adult films. The site has a large collection of Silvia Saint videos and photosets, as well as featuring many other attractive porn models. The site gives access to Silvia Saint's personal blog, which is updated at least weekly. So if you are a fan of hers, you can read personal messages from her, and read what she is doing and thinking recently. I honestly don't know how many PU members would be interested in this blog. She writes in a simple, friendly style, calling
her fans "darling", blowing them hugs and kisses. So in a sense, if you read the blog, and
you're in the right frame of mind, that could save you a few visits to a hooker, if you
can accept the substitution. The blog also has lots of small pics of many of the models
Silvia is currently working with.

Site Stats:
Movies: 737
DVDs: 304
Pornstars: 481
Pictures: 6660
HD Movies (283)

Older movies (scenes) might have more limited definitions for stream and download:
Streaming: 240p, 480p.
Download: 240p, 480p.

Newer videos have multiple definitions available for streaming and download.
Steaming: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p.
Download: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.

The main sites in the netFameSolutions network, based on amount of content, include:
Devils Film
Peter North
Rocco Siffredi
Silverstone DVD
Silvia Saint

I think that the Silvia Saint site is a fine addition to the netFameSolutions network. The
site has a large amount of hardcore DVD content, but the vibe of the site is different from the Devils Film, Rocco Siffredi, or Peter North sites. The site features a nice mix of male-female and lesbian videos, with and without toys.

The interview videos, titled "casting" videos, seem to offer a glimpsle of the models as
real people, not overly glamorized or putting on a fake show, but giving a realistic interview with some nudity thrown in, maybe some masturbation as well.

I enjoyed the site. Silvia Saint is a very attractive model, she seems to enjoy sex, is very open, and the site, although hardcore, just seems like a friendly place to visit.

It's hard to rate this site. A lot of the appeal depends on how much you like Silvia Saint. If you are fan of hers, obviously, the site would get a much higher score. If you don't think she's attractive (people can have widely differing tastes), then your personal score would be lower.

I'm giving the site a score of 88. But if you factor in the access to the tons of hardcore DVD material you get at other sites in the Fame network, you could bump the score to the low 90s.

04-22-13  10:59am

Replies (1)
Review
6
Visit Give Me Teens

Give Me Teens
(1)

74.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -PU discount of $14.95/month (recurring)
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Part of the netFameSolutions network. This site gives you access to 20+ sites in the network, including the major sites of Devils Film; Peter North; Rocco Siffredi; Silverstone DVD; Silvia Saint.
-Can choose streaming or download for videos.
-There is a photo set associated with each video.
-The photos are shot individually. These are not screen caps. They are good quality photos: not glamor style photos, but decently shot, nicely framed, good lighting, good color, etc.
-You can sort the scenes by category, series, or porn star.
-Wide selection of teen categories.
-They include the posting date of each video.
-They identify the female models in each video.
Cons: -The general level of model prettiness/attractiveness is poor. These models are far less attractive than the models at Diesel Access network, X-Art, or other teen glamor sites. The Give Me Teens are less attractive than the models at Teen Mega World, or Nubiles.
-The photo sets do not have a zip file.
-Pre-checked cross-sell at sign-up.
-The search is basic, by drop-down list. There is no blank search box where you can enter a porn star's name, or type of sex action, or any combination of factors.
-Search is site-specific. You check a model's name, you get the scenes she is in at this
site, not across the entire network. Have to check each site individually to see if there
is any of her content at that site.
-A lot of the content was shot for Devils Film, so it is also posted at the Devils Film site.
Bottom Line: The site is teen hardcore DVD videos. The approach is homestyle, not glamor. So you get to
see porn stars who could fit in a trailer-trash movie having sex, with the emphasis on female models (teens or twenties) and guys who appear to get their clothes from a local K-Mart or other cheap discount store going at it.

Site Stats:
Movies: 601
DVDs: 162
Pornstars: 654
Pictures: 87846

The DVD quality is OK to good. The scenes are well lighted, good colors, good sound control (no
extraneous noises, etc.), good focus, good definition.


The definition choices of the videos depend on how old the DVD is:
Older videos:
Streaming in 240p, 480p
Download in 240p, 480p

Newer videos:
Streaming in 240p, 480p, 540p
Download in 240p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p

Minor point:
The model named Barbara C sure looks like Barbamiska (also known as Barbara, Darya, Dasha, Diana, Elina, Elina Heaton, Mirjam, Pocahontas, Polly, Sally, Stevie, Trinity on different sites).
Is it the same girl?
She appears in two scenes at Give Me Teens:
Ass Full Of Cum #05, Scene #05
18 Year Old Pussy #16 Cream Pie Edition, Scene #05

This is supposed to be a teen hardcore site. But many of the models look to be older than teens. And the models are, on average, less attractive than the models at the glamcore/heartcore sites, and also less attractive than the teens featured at Teen Mega World. Also, a lot of the material at this site is found at other sites in the network. So even if you really like teen hardcore videos, this site is nothing special.

What gives this site value is that it includes access to the netFameSolutions network, which has a massive amount of hardcore videos covering a wide range of categories. Or if you join through one of the other sites in the network, you get access to this site.

To be truthful, I think the network would have more value if they deleted this site, because if you are looking for teen videos, you will have better luck searching through other sites on this network.

04-20-13  03:39pm

Replies (5)
Review
7
Visit Peter North

Peter North
(1)

87.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Have choice to view videos streaming or download.
Older videos have only 2 choices for definition:
Steaming choice is 240p or 480p.
Download choice is WMV or MP4 file types, on 240p or 480p.

-Newer videos have more choices for definition:
Streaming: 240p, 480p, 540p.
Downloading: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
-No download limit.
-No DRM.
-In the public preview pages, you can watch brief sample clips of the videos the site features. You also have access to the drop-down list of the site porn stars, and the thumbnail listing of the site porn stars. This thumbnail listing is much more complete than the thumbnail listing at most of the other sites in the network.
-The public preview pages also gives you the scenes each model appears in, so you can tell how many scenes your favorite models are in.
-Long time before site timeout.
-PU discount at $14.95/month (recurring).
-Thousands of hardcore videos, many of them featuring Peter North.
Cons: -Search is basic. Have to use a drop-down list to search for porn model, series, etc. A blank search box would be much easier to use.
-Search is limited to just one site. You can't search across the network for content by a model, but have to search site by site, which is time consuming and takes a lot of effort.
-Navigation is basic.
-Uncheck the pre-checked offer, or you will be signed up for a trial membership in some other site.
Bottom Line: Site statistics:
Movies: 2770
DVDs: 566
Pornstars: 1767
Pictures: 62568

This is a huge site. And access to any one of the sites in the Fame Digital network gives you access to all the sites in the network, which is about 27 sites.

The main sites,with the most content are:
Devils Film
Peter North
Rocco Siffredi
Silverstone DVD
Silvia Saint

But there are over 20 specialty sites, which have less content, but cater to different niches: Lesbian, Teen, Creampie, Hairy, Indian, Granny, etc.

If you've never been a member before, it's definitely worth visiting, because of the huge amount of hardcore videos, and the wide range of content. And there are sometimes special offers where you can join for as low as $5 for the first month.

Giving the site a score of 87 because of the huge amount of hardcore videos at this site and the access to tons of hardcore videos at the other sites in the network, as well as offering a wide range of material.

04-16-13  03:33am

Replies (0)
Review
8
Visit Playboy Plus

Playboy Plus
(1)

68.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Discount through PU. $14.95 instead of $29.99/month.
-Easy login. No captcha.
-Can view photosets as slide show or download the zip set.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Good download speeds. I'm getting 1.3 MB/sec, my max download speed.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Choice of download version quality: Many videos have a WVGA480, HD720, and a HD1080 version.
Cons: -Uncheck pre-checked cross-sell.
-Search could be better. Search term "Christine Maddox" returns any photoset with the name of "Christine" as first name or last name, instead of specifically returning only photosets with the name of "Christine Maddox" included.
-Also, either they are missing photos of past playmates, or the search does not return all the photos of those playmates. For example, the annual photoguide of past playmates of the year photos are sometimes not included in the search result. There are other past photos of playmates and models that are either not on the site, or not returned by a search of the model's name.
-Some bugs in the navigation or site structure. You play a slide show of Susie Scott, and it only plays a few of the 24 photos in the set, then stops. Can't get it to play/show all the photos in the set.
-Photoset of a playmate does not include the data sheet.
Bottom Line: -Back in the 1960s and 1970s, Playboy was the premier "gentleman's magazine". Penthouse was a close second. Both those magazines were renowned for their nude photography, as well as their articles and fiction and interviews. They were money-making machines that brought their founders vast wealth. Those days are history. Both Playboy and Penthouse have flirted with bankruptcy in recent years.

This is supposed to be a softcore glamor photo and video site. Given the Playboy name, you would expect to find superior, high quality photos and videos of their models.

-I don't know why, but there are superior copies of their onsite photos available elsewhere. Years ago, I belonged to a newsgroup, and I collected the photos of most playmates.
You look at the photos at this Playboy Plus site, and the photos just don't have the same impact as the photos that I collected. The basic image is the same, but the images I collected from the newsgroups were more striking.

-Some photos are mis-labeled. You play a slide show of a photoset, and instead of identifying the model(s) in each photo, the label shows the title of the photoset. So you have to know from other sources (or your own special knowledge) who these models are.

-No choice of download version quality for zip photosets. This is surprising. For a photo-oriented site, the only option I see is for one definition of a zip file download, not the standard 3 definitions that many photo sites have of low, medium, and high quality.

-The quality of the "high definition" video files can be poor. For example, the video for "stacy-fuson-paymate-of-the-month-vid-01.mp4" is 1920x1080, total bitrate is 6049 kbps, which would seem to indicate a high quality, high definition video. But the frame rate is 7 frames/second, which might explain why the video is a poorly defined video picture. I've seen the DVD which this video is made from, and the video is much sharper than the video you download from Playboy Plus.

Let me be clear. Watching the downloaded video is like watching a shitty version of the video you should be watching.

The streaming version of that video is better quality, but nowhere near the quality of Metart, Diesel Access network, or other fine sites. The video quality of a streaming video at Playboy Plus is actually below the quality of the Teen Mega World videos.

That is amazing to me. Don't the people running this site realize the video quality of their videos is so poor, compared to the better sites on the internet?

Maybe they are blind to the poor quality of their photographs, which is not as bad as the quality of their video downloads. But the obvious degradation of their video download files is pathetic, for a site that is supposed to empasize the beauty of the female form.

The site does not use DRM. But the poor quality of the video files I have downloaded, in effect, means you can not save a high quality video file. And I am going to sign up for a new membership to a newsgroup, because I believe I will be able to find better quality photos of past playmates from a newsgroup than I can find at this Playboy Plus pay site.

I don't believe my expectations for this site were too high. But what I've found at this site, in terms of photo image quality, and video image quality, is a massive disappointment.

Not all videos are as bad (poor definition) as these 2 videos of Stacy Fuson. The videos of Erika Eleniak are better. Not great, not as good or defined as high quality sites like Metart or Diesel Access, but still better than the Stacy Fuson videos.


Giving the site a score of 68. I believe the quality of the photos at the site is inferior to what you will find at high-quality sites like Metart and MPL Studios and Femjoy.
And the quality of the videos is even further below what you will find at those other sites.

Comparing the photo and video quality of this site to high grade sites on the internet, you begin to realize the Playboy brand has really fallen from its former quality standards.

03-10-13  10:18pm

Replies (8)
Review
9
Visit Nasty Angels

Nasty Angels
(1)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Apparently one username and password will work to gain entry to all the bonus sites I am supposed to have access to.
-Get access to 21 bonus sites with membership.
-Download manager works. I use Down Them All, which is very helpful at this site.
-Homepage has a link to "YOUNG TIGHT PUSSY new for your ultimate pleasure", which opens an ad for fleshlight, which has differently named models of the fleshlight, also different color options, which is really more than I wanted to know.
Cons: -You are assigned a random-generated username and password for site login.
-Primitive site design.
-Download speeds can vary from less thant 200 KB/sec to 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-You have to be patient with their hot links. They often don't work on the first or second click.
-Download manager is really helpful. If a video file stops downloading, you can resume the download with the download manager. Several files stopped downoading in mid-download, and I was able to resume the download in each case.
-Video files download with the default filename of "download.zip". So you have to rename the files to keep them separate.
-Site contents have no posting date.
-No search function. If you want to find the videos with a model, have to manually search through the entire videos and hope her name is listed on the tiny thumbnail that represents the video listing.
-No streaming offered. If you want to examine a video, have to download the video, and then play it.
Bottom Line: This is not a tiny site. There are over 300 videos at this site. The theme of the site is young teens doing nasty things with sex.
The poor site structure makes navigation difficult. No search function, no model listing with thumbnails to show what the models look like, no model bios. They opened this site, and dumped a bunch of videos into it. And that's a shame. Because many of the models are cute or attractive. Many of the videos are nicely shot.

Videos are grouped into two categories:
Softcore movies, and hardcore movies.
Their definition of softcore includes lesbian sex, blowjob, masturbation.
Their definition of hardcore includes boy-girl fucking. Blowjob can be found in both the softcore and hardcore movie categories.

The videos are better than I thought they would be.
Sample data rates:
The frame width x height is: 1024x576.
Total bitrate: 2548kbps

Frame width x height is: 632x512
Total bitrate: 1181 kbps

The videos are professionally shot: good color, good focus, good lighting, nicely framed shots.

They also have some very attractive models at this site.
It's a shame they have some nice videos of attractive models that they just dumped the videos into a site without making much effort to making the site easier to use. Because of the unsorted, jumbled videos, most people would not realize that some of the videos are really excellent.

I'm giving the site a score of 75 because some of these videos are worth viewing and saving. That's in spite of the site problems which I've detailed: no search function, no streaming, no model iist with thumbnails to show what the models look like, hot links that barely work to download the videos.

I certainly can't recommend the site. Except that if you stumbled across some of the videos that I thought were really nice, maybe you would think the site might be worth joining, after all.

02-19-13  11:14am

Replies (2)
Review
10
Visit Young Sex Parties

Young Sex Parties
(2)

69.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Good download speeds. I get 1 to 1.3 MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Down Them All download manager works at this site.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Site uses Epoch.com as the billing agent, a nationally recognized bill agent.
-The content is dated when posted to the site.
Cons: -Site needs a complete makeover to make it easier to use.
-Search function is poor. You enter the name of a model, and it turns out that the model is not even in the videos or photosets that are returned from the search. So either different models are given the same name, or the search function is crap. Either way, if you want to search for videos that a model appears in, it seems like you will have to manually search through all the videos at this site, which is a complete waste of time.
-No simple lising of site models, with a nice thumbnail to identify what they look like.
-Lots of advertising for other sites on members pages.
-There is an amateur feel to the videos. They seem to shot by an amateur videographer who has an amateur camera: the focus could be better, the shots could be better framed, the lighting is ok but not professional, the colors are not super-crisp, the sets/background is cheap furniture inside a house or apartment.
Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED):
-Videos download with a poor default filename such as "high.MP4, so you have to rename them to tell them apart.
-The site structure is poor. To go through the videos, you have to click on a number to go to a page that lists 5 videos, then click on the higher number go to the next page. But you get duplicates of videos that were found on earlier pages. A video that appears on page 3 might also appear on page 4. So it's not easy to navigate the site, and the duplicate listings make it harder.

-No simple lising of site models, with a nice thumbnail to identify what they look like. Trying to identify who the models are in the videos is a waste of time. Unless you recognize a model in a video from some other site, you don't know who the models are in a video, because the names the site lists (for who appears in a video) are useless.

-Videos have subtitles to translate the Russian the models speak. But the video download files do not have the subtitles. Not a big deal, because the subtitles are mainly boring. The sex action is what counts.


BOTTOM LINE:

Sorry for the poor language, but these site/network really needs a makeover to make the site contents easier to use.
When you compare Teen Mega World or Diesel Access networks or X-Art or other high grade sites to this site, you begin to realize how much thought was put into making the other sites/networks easier to use. At Young Sex Parties, there is little to no thought to making the site user-friendly. They opened a site, dumped cheap amateur-style, home made videos into the site, and let the members sort through the mess without any helpful model list, without any effort to name the models on a consistent basis, without bothering to add a listing of the models in the videos.

Choice of file types for download:
FLV For Windows,
MP4 For Windows, Mac, iPad, iPhone4
MP4 For iPhone3/iPod
MP4 For Sony PSP
3GP For mobile phones

Number of site videos:
The Best Porn (the parent of the PU site) lists the number of site videos at 117.
I believe The Best Porn site reviewer just took the number of videos from the site facts, instead of counting the videos themselves.
You have a sort-of-listing of the videos pages, 24 pages in all, with most pages showing 5 videos. The last page has 3 videos. But like I mentioned, there are duplicate listing of at least several videos on those pages.

So the 117 video count at this site means you have 117 videos if you include the duplicate videos.

If you want to follow that system, then if a site has 10 video, and they list those 10 videos twice, then the site can claim 20 videos. Or even 100 videos, if they are sloppy enough to list their videos duplicate times in a list.

The models are real teens. Both the girls and the boys. The girls are OK, not really cute or super-attractive. On average, the models are less attractive than the teens you will see at random at a hometown mall. Maybe that's partly because the models appear to wear very little make-up to make themselves more attractive. The models' clothes are what they could buy at a thrift shop or the Salvation Army store.

The bottom line is, after watching a number of these videos, I start to find them mostly boring and a waste of time to watch. I much prefer the glamcore videos at X-Art or Diesel Access network, where an effort is made to present the models attractively. Or even Teen Mega World videos, where less effort is made to make the models attractive, but the physical attractiveness of the models is higer than the models at Young Sex Parties, and the overall quality of the videos is better than the Young Sex Parties videos.

In my opinion, the amateurish feel of the videos just means cheap production values, unattractive selection of models, cheap clothes and cheap settings.

I hope that I will find better videos at the other bonus sites in this network.

02-18-13  01:51am

Replies (3)
Review
11
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(2)

99.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -The finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet.
-A huge amount of photosets, number of individual models, number of contributing photographers.
-Easy login.
-Long time before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-I use DownThemAll download manager, which works at this site.
-Fast download speeds. I normally get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-CCBill billing agent, which is one of the best credit card processors around.
-Search engine to allow you to search for models or photosets or photographers that you might like.
-Wide range of locations for the videos and photosets. In studios or houses, in fields, forests, at lakes or oceans or beach, they pose their lovely models to best advantage to show off these beauties.
Cons: -The cons are basically minor. This is without a doubt the finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet.
-The sheer size of the site (number of photosets, number of models, number of videos) appears to turn some people off. Instead of appreciating the massive amount of content, many people seem to
think the site has too many photosets to go through, and that, because there are so many gorgeous gils, that the models themselves are not as attractive as they really are.
-Metart has a patent on filming gorgeous naked teens and making the videos boring and a waste of time to watch. This is something I've wondered about for years: It's just a wasted opportunity of attractive models.
-The site will disappoint those looking for midcore or hardcore action. This is strictly a softcore site. No boys are in any photosets. If there are two girls in a photoset or video, their interaction is extremely softcore. No masturbation or fondling of the other girl.
Bottom Line: As I've stated many time in the past, this is the finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet.
There is an amazing amount of content. The site updates with 4 to 6 updates daily, which is just amazing for a single site.

Site statistics:
Number of photosets: 12,534
Number of videos: 1,045 Movies
Number of models: 2,766 Models
Number of contributing photographers: 250
Number of photos: 1,365,839
Those are staggering numbers, that blow past any softcore teen glamor site that I'm aware of.

Metart is the giant in the field, not just in terms of quantity, but also quality. Since it's start back in the late 1990s, Metart has featured high-quality teen softcore photography from leading photographers around the world.

The photosets are offered in three sizes for both online viewing and for download:
Low definition, medium definition, high definition.

The videos can be streamed or downloaded in three definitions as well: low, medium and high.

Metart was the site I picked for my first review for PU in 2008. At that time I gave the site a score of 97. That turned out to be the highest score I've ever given to any site. Since that time, the site has only increased the number of models and photosets and photographers. I think the review I did about 4 years ago is still basically accurate today.

One difference is that the Metart live shows/live chat have changed. Metart used to offer an in-
house live chat that featured a number of girls that were live each day for a number of hours
daily. The public shows were basically free. True, you could pay for a private show, or you could tip a girl during her public show. But it was basically a free source of entertainment, and the girls were friendly, and the shows were not designed to maximize the amount of money the members would pay to watch the show. That seems almost quaint today. Most live shows I've seen recently try to get the members to pay to watch the girls perform.

Metart no longer has the in-house live chat shows. Instead, they offer a link to a commercial live chat program designed to make money off the members. I believe it's cheaper to go to a topless bar than to watch a private live cam show.

Lately, the site seems to have loosened their rules, and allow two girls to kiss in a photoset or video, but the kisses are almost chaste. The sample video in the preview pages gives a false impression the site has erotic videos. It's true the videos inside are of naked girls, and many of the models are attractive. But I can't emphasize enough how boring these videos are.

I complain about the boring videos. But because of the massive photoset content, the high quality of the photos, the number of photographers that contribute to this site, the site deserves its reputation as best in breed of teen softcore glamor sites. I gave the site a score of 97 about 4 years ago, and the site has only improved since then, adding more content, trying to make using the site easier to use over time, changing the default filenaming system to make the filenames more descriptive, and in other ways they try to make the site more user-friendly.

I am giving the site a score of 99.

How could they improve this site, to give it a perfect 100?

That would be a fantasy project:
1. They could delete almost all their
videos, and hire whoever shoots the videos at X-Art or the Diesel Access network. But that would mean a change in the Met-art philosophy, which stresses softcore porn.

2. They could send their models over to my house, where I could tell if their models are really as attracive as they look. At my age (I'm in my 60s), I couldn't do that much with these girls, but it sure would be nice to try. But that might be illegal. So maybe they could hire me as a stunt cock. Again, that would mean a change in their softcore approach. But maybe they could start a "Metart meets an aging fan reality show", because reality shows are very popular today.

Unfortunately, that's only in my dreams.

For $20/month with a PU discount, this site is a fantastic bargain. Or $99/year, which is an even better deal if you join the site for a month and believe the site is worth a long term membership. I think the site is like a museum of Most Erotic Teens, which I believe is the former name of the site, from which they changed it to MET-Art. For a softcore teen site, this is truly the best in show.

02-14-13  07:54am

Replies (10)
Review
12
Visit Wow Girls

Wow Girls
(4)

92.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -A nice number of cute or attractive models.
-High quality videos.
-High quality photosets.
-Easy login. Once you have logged in, and saved your login information, to re-enter the site, just click on the "member login", you don't have to re-enter your login information.
-One update per day. Either a photoset or a video.
-Content is dated by when it's posted to the site.
-Long time before site timeout.
-DownThemAll download manager works.
-Good download speeds. I get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-Simple site design. Makes it easy to search the videos or photosets by model or by posting date.
-No download limits.
-Preview section for non-members has large-sized thumbnails of many of the models, so
you can see what they look like, and if they will appeal to your taste.
-Free access to the Diesel Access Live shows. These are live shows/live chats that
feature a few models that appear at the Diesel Access network and the Wow Girls site.
Cons: -Cons are basically minor. This is an excellent site.
-No model bio. These girls are so lovely, it would be nice to know at least something more about them. No age, no physical statistics, no background information, nothing.
-Trivial point: eliminate the background music on some of the videos. It doesn't add anything of value.
-This is not a con, but more like a suggestion: Preview section for non-members has 10 video samples that give you an idea of what the videos are like. Each video sample is only 16 seconds long. 30 seconds or even 60 seconds would give you a better idea. Or be a sport and make each video sample 90 seconds. The sample video is supposed to be a tease, to make you want to join. But I think a longer sample would be more effective.
-Not all photosets or videos are hardcore. Some photosets show only a topless girl. Some photosets show topless and bottomless, but no sexual activity.
Bottom Line: This site is brought to you by the same people who run the Diesel Access network (Young Legal Porn, 18 Only Girls). But here, instead of being part of the Diesel Access network, this site is marketed as a separate offering.

But the main point is that this site offers the same approach in their content to the Diesel Access network: girls that are in their teens or early twenties, girls that are clean with little or no tatoos or piercings, a lot of young girls that are attractive to really lovely. And the photosets and videos are high quality: professionally photographed or videotaped, good focus, good sound control (very little random
noises), good lighting, good colors (skin tones, etc.), clean, sharp photos and videos.

Number of videos: 205+
Number of photosets: 349+

-Choice of definition for download of videos: HD 1080p, HD 720p, SD 480p, LD 360p.
-You can download selected scenes from each video.
-Streaming options include: 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
(The LD 360p is for iPods.)

-Choice of definition for zips for photosets: 1000 px, 2000 px, 4000 px.

The site offers a variety of porn. The sex is not gonzo or rough. It is young girls who are are enjoying themselves in a variety of situations:
-A solo girl undressing partway or all the way. It may be simple nudity, or nudity with slight masturbation, or heavier masturbation.
-Two girls together.
-Sometimes three girls together.
-A boy and a girl.
-A boy and two girls.

Each video is broken down into scenes, with an illustrating thumbnail, so you can get an idea of what the model looks like, and what the action is, for each scene. And the individual scenes in a video can be selected for either download or streaming. So the site gives you a easy way to select how to treat these videos and photosets for your own individual taste.

This basic approach/setup is used for the Diesel Access network and at the Wow Girls and Wow Porn sites. It's an extremely user-friendly design that makes the site easy to use. The fact that the videos and photosets are high quality, and that many of the girls are extremely attractive, means you don't have to hunt through a pile of junk to find the hidden jewels: Some of the girls are fucking lovely, and their videos and photosets prove it.

As a bonus, if you remain a member of Wow Girls over a certain period of time, you probably gain access to Wow Porn. That's the way it worked for me. I was a member of Wow Girls, and one day when logging in to the Wow Girls site, I was given the choice of logging in to Wow Girls, or to Wow Porn. There was no official notification of when I first gained access to Wow Porn. And when I first joined Wow Girls, there was no notice that Wow Porn would be a bonus site if I stayed a member for a certain period of time. Actually, I had never heard of Wow Porn, before it popped up on my computer screen as an alternative choice to logging in to Wow Girls.

I'm giving Wow Girls a score of 92. That is based on how attractive many of these models are, the high quality of the videos and photosets, the ease of use of the site, and the nice amount of content at the site.

02-03-13  04:05am

Replies (26)
Review
13
Visit Oye Loca

Oye Loca
(1)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Most of the videos I saw had models who appear to be real latin teens or early twenties.
-This site is part of the Team Skeet network. Access to any site in the network gives you access to all the sites in the network.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Easy login to site. Once you have logged in, you do not have to re-enter your login information, just click the "members" link to re-enter the site.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Good download speeds. I got 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Can stream or download many videos in multiple definitions.
-$17.87/month recurring discounted price through PU.
Cons: -Cons are basically minor.
-Content does not have a posting date.
-In many of the videos the guys are wearing condoms. Doesn't bother me, but some viewers might not like it.
-When you log into the site, the first page you see is a cross-sell to some other porn site. If you click the "No thanks" link, you then enter the members area. This is minor, but it's one of
the few porn paysites I've seen where you have to bypass an advertising screen before you can enter the members area.
But then again, I believe that Amazon sells some e-readers or other branded devices, that come with automatic advertising. And if you pay a one-time fee, you get rid of the automatic advertising.
-Most of the videos are in Spanish. But who cares what the models or stunt cocks are saying? It's probably better if you don't understand, because that gives the videos an exotic flavor. Also, you have to admit, these latina models sure speak a lot more, and more naturally, than the Eastern European porn models.
Bottom Line: This is a teen hardcore site featuring latina models.
The models are late teens or early twenties.
There are a lot of attractive models.
The body types are latin: so you don't get the preponderance of skinny white teens you have at many teen sites. At this site, you get a cross-section of skinny and medium-sized girls. Most of the girls have little or no tattoos. Very little piercing on most girls.
Most of the videos are 1 guy - 1 girl. There are a few 1 guy - 2 girls.

Videos
Number of videos: 168+
Runtime: about 20 to 40 minutes.
They have a number of different ways you can view a video.
For streaming, some have a choice of watching in low, medium, or high definition.
You can also choose to watch the entire video, a preview of the video, or break the video into which segment you want to watch.
For a video that run 29 minutes, you can select your starting point to watch at 0 (the start of the video), at 05.55 which means 5 minutes 55 seconds), at 11:54, 17:51, or 23:48.

Or you can choose to download:
1080p MP4; 720p MP4; HI mpg4; LOW mpg4; low WMV; IPod file.

They have a photo gallery for each video.
They also have a screen cap gallery for each video.
I'm not sure why they have both a photo gallery as well as a screen cap gallery. That seems like overkill.
But this site is geared more for videos than photos.
The photo galleries and the screencap galleries, for me, are a waste of resources and site space. I realize that the operators are trying to provide a complete resource for their members. But I appreciate photos from sites like Metart, Erotic Beauty, MPL Studios, Femjoy, etc., where they try to present the models as attractively as possible.
At this site, they are presenting the models in a "natural" way.
So this approach might have fans, but I'm not one of them. If you can put your mind into a frame that the photo sets and the screen caps are like a stop-motion record of a latin guy getting ready to have sex with a latina, and then having the sex, then maybe you would appreciate the photos and screen caps. But I think it's just a waste of time, since you can watch the video directly.

Models have only 1 video at Oye Loca. But a few models might have a second video at another site in the network, and still fewer could have 3 or 4 videos scattered throughout the network.

They do provide a limited amount of data for each model. For example: for the model Sienna West:
Birthday: November 6
Birth Location: Orange County
Measurements: 34DD-24-34
Height: 160 cm - 5 feet and 3 inches
Weight: 55 kg - 121 lbs
Haircolor: Red
Nationality: Uruguay
Ethicity: Caucasian
Tatoos: Stars on both wrist; back of neck
Piercings: Navel, nose, upper lip

If you are into latina girls, or if you are tired of watching the slender young white teens featured at many other sites, then this site could provide a nice change of pace.

And with the other 13 sites that are included with a membership, you also get a nice variety of teen-early twenty models in a variety of settings and situations.

Giving the site a score of 85. That's highly subjective. Some users might rate it higher. Other users could rate it lower.

01-20-13  02:54pm

Replies (0)
Review
14
Visit She's New

She's New
(1)

75.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Some very nice, attractive models.
-Choice of streaming or download for videos.
-Streaming offers low, medium and high definition.
-Download offers low, medium, high (720p), and very high (1080p).
-There is also an iPod file type for download.
-Easy login. Once you have logged in to this network, for subsequent logins, just hit the members link and you are inside the site without having to enter your username or password.
-No DRM.
-Fast download speeds. I usually get 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Content appears to be exclusive to this site.
-Many of the models are early in their career in porn.
-PU discount of $17.87/month recurring.
-The network is dropping the pre-checked cross-selling agreements that are found when you join the network sites.
Cons: -Most cons are basically minor - if you can get past the amateur or homemade flavor of the site contents, or appreciate that approach.
-The names of a few models are not their most common names.
Tiff Love is better known as Tiffany Thompson or Tiffany. Many porn models have multiple names, but a major starlet like Tiffany Thompson should be given the name of Tiffany, or Tiffany Thompson, instead of creating a new name of Tiff Love.
-The video camera operator is amateur quality: he needs to learn
to frame the model better, to move the camera smoothly so the picture doesn't jerk, to move back from the actors so the picture shows more of the model instead of cutting off parts of the model's body from the picture. The overall effect is that you are watching an amateur home video, instead of a professionally shot video. The site is pretending to show you home made videos. But I much prefer to watch professional videos that are shot correctly.
Bottom Line: Note: I was specifically referring to the poor camera work at the She's New site of the network. The camera work at the Rub A Teen site, of this network, is professional quality.

Bottom Line:
This site is part of the Team Skeet network. Membership in any one of the network sites gives you access to all the sites in the network.
There are currently 14 sites in the network. The network focuses on models in their teens or early twenties.

The 14 sites that make up Team Skeet include:
ExxxtraSmall
Her Freshman Year
Innocent High
Oye Loca
POV Life
Self Desire
Rub A Teen
She's New
Solo Interviews
Team Skeet Extras
Teeny Black
The Real Workout
This Girl Sucks
Titty Attack

Number of videos at site: 50+
Rate of updates: 1 video per week.
Video runtime: 11 to 32 minutes. Many are 15 minutes or less.

The options for viewing and downloading the videos at this site (and network) are extensive.
You can stream the videos in low, medium or high definition.
You can download in low, medium, high (720p) and very high (1080p) definitions. There is also an iPod file format for downloading.

The site description states:
"We've got the hottest teens, first timers, and complete amateurs getting nice and nasty. We get submissions everyday from couples, ex's, and horny exhibitionist who want to spice things up!"

You also get a photoset of photos for each video, as well as a gallery of screencaps for each video. But the photosets, like the videos themselves, appear to be taken by a poor amateur
photographer. If the amateur approach turns you on, maybe the photosets are worth keeping. Otherwise, the photos are just poorly framed, poorly lighted, poorly colored pictures that are
not worth keeping.

I much prefer the professional quality photosets at sites like Met-Art, MPL Studios, Femjoy, etc., versus the amateur approach that She's New tries to emulate. Actually, most amateur photos and videos I've seen (which are non-nude) show much more professional technique than the photos and videos at the She's New site.

I am judging the site by my enjoyment of the videos and photosets. If, instead, I was rating the site on how well the site is emulating that these videos and photosets were submitted by amateurs, who had poor techniques for filming, I would rate the site higher. But like I said, most (non-nude) videos and photosets I have seen, taken by amateurs, show much higher professionalism in the results.

By joining any site in the network, you gain access to all the sites in the network. You get a wide range of hardcore themes for the teen/young twenties models: high school, amateur, latina, black, big tits, blow job.

I am giving the site a score of 75.

01-08-13  02:15am

Replies (2)
Review
15
Visit Team Skeet

Team Skeet
(4)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Epoch is the billing company.
-Get a confirming email on signup.
-Currently a discounted price of $17.87/month.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Good download speeds. I average 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Videos have date they were posted to the site.
-Nice selection of attractive teen models.
Cons: -Most of the cons are basically minor.
-Thumbnails of other sites that are being advertised are present on the members pages.
-Need to un-check the pre-checked offer at signup.
-Large watermark bottom right side of videos.
-Most of the videos at the Rub A Teen site were previously posted at Tricky Masseur(TeenMegaWorld network). But Rub A Teen offers those videos in a higher definition.
Bottom Line: -Team skeet is currently a network of 14 sites. There is another network of around 12 sites that is run by the same partner, but that other network requires a separate membership.
The 14 sites that make up Team Skeet include:
Innocent High
She's New
Oye Loca
POV Life
Titty Attack
The Real Workout
This Girl Sucks
Self Desire
Her Freshman Year
Solo Interviews
Team Skeet Extras
ExxxtraSmall
Rub A Teen
Teeny Black

The Team Skeet network focuses on teen hardcore videos. The video quality is high grade. The videos are mainly professionally shot. Good lighting, good camera work, good focus, etc.
You get a choice of several definitions for both streaming and downloading.
For streaming, you can choose low, medium or high definition.
For download, you can choose 1080p, 720p, or lower definitions. They also offer a file for iPods.

You also get photosets of many of the videos. The photos are good quality. Below what you will find at major photo sites like MetArt or MPL Studios. But better than screen caps.

Minor nitpick: The site Innocent High features models that are supposed to be in high school. But because of the models' ages, it would be better to name them College Pros. None of the models I saw showed any innocence or hesitation about fucking and sucking their brains out.

The network has over 1,000 videos. The average runtime is between 20-30 minutes. Many of the models are real teens. Some models appear to be in their early twenties. There are a large number of very attractive young girls. So for a reduced price of $17.87/month with the PU/TBP discount, you gain access to a large number of hardcore teen videos that are professionally shot.

12-25-12  07:58am

Replies (8)
Review
16
Visit Rub A Teen

Rub A Teen
(1)

73.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Easy login. Username and password. No captcha.
-Epoch is the billing company.
-You get a confirming email on signup. Which is starting to get rare, for some reason. At least some of the sites I've joined in the last year, I've gotten no confirming email. How much does it cost to send an email? But why bother, since if the customer forgets his username or password, or has some problem about cancelling his membership, that's his problem, and in the meantime, the site can continue charging him for his membership.
-I'm seeing so many lovely young models at many different networks/sites. And this network has some truly gorgeous young models.
-Default viewing option. Select your favorite viewing option on how to view a scene, and the site will remember it. Not sure how useful this is, seems more like a gimmick than anything useful.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Download manager works. I use DownThemAll.
-Good download speeds. I regularly get 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
Cons: PROS (continued):
-Membership price recently reduced to $17.87/month. I'm not sure how long that price reduction will last.
-Videos have the date they were posted to the site.

==============
CONS:

-Pre-checked offer at signup has to be unchecked, or you will have a $1.00 1-day trial membership to some site, that automatically renews at $38.57/month. So if you miss the pre-checked offer, you will be paying $38.57/month until you figure out what's happening.
-Get thumbnails advertising other sites on the member's pages. If you paid to get inside, do you need this advertising thrown at you? But many sites are doing it.
-Large watermark bottom right side of videos.
-Small site. Only has 20 videos so far.
-19 of the 20 videos were previously posted at Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network). There was one video at Rub A Teen that I did not match up. But that's probably because I didn't want to spend the time going through each video at Tricky Masseur.
Bottom Line: If you've been a member of Teen Mega World in the last 6 months, and you examined the Tricky Masseur site of that network, then you've probably seen all or almost all of the videos that are at Rub A Teen.
The Rub A Teen site offers more choices in the video definition than the Tricky Masseur site. For the videos that are at both sites, Tricky Masseur offers a low, medium and high definiton download. Rub A Teen goes one better: a low, medium and high definition, and a higher definition. (The high definition is 720p, the higher definition is 1080p.)
The Tricky Masseur site often has subtitles to go with the foreign language the actors/models speak. The Rub A Teen site videos do not have the subtitles. But once you have read the subtitles, you realize the words have little meaning, so the absence of subtitles is not a problem, because what the actors/models are saying is basically just noise.
Teen Mega World is a huge network, with a lot of great-looking models, and a lot of hot hardcore videos. It's certainly worth joining the network at least once, to look through their tremendous archive of hardcore videos.
Tricky Masseur has 93 videos. It's basically an archive site, having added only 1 new video in the last 7 months.
The Rub A Teen site has 20 videos total. 19 of the videos were already posted at Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network).

The difference in file size between the 1080p version and the 720p version is huge:
For example, for a video with a runtime of 29 minutes 30 seconds (the Laura video):

Rub A Teen Laura video:
The 1080p MP4 file size is 2.08 GB.
The 720p MP4 file size is 1.05 GB.

Tricky Masseur Laura video:
No 1080p version is offered.
The 720p file size is 999 MB.

How many people are going to spend 2 GB per video of hard drive space?
Most of the videos are between 25 to 30 minutes in runtime.
So if you are going to keep the 1080p version on your hard drive, you are allocating around 2 GB per video. And if you are a collector of videos, you will be buying lots of hard drive capacity to store these huge video files.

Actually, I don't know why the file sizes at Rub A Teen are so large.
At Diesel network, for instance, they give you 1080p video for a 30 minute runtime, and the file size is 686 MB. That compares to 2.08 GB at Rub A Teen.

Comparing the bit rate of the 720p files (of the same video):
Rub A Teen Total bitrate = 5134 kbps Frame rate = 29 frames/second
Tricky Masseur Total bitrate = 4736 kbps Frame rate = 25 frames/second

Comparing the bit rate of a 1080p video, with a completely different 1080p video:
Rub A Teen Total bitrate = 10136 kbps Frame rate = 29 frames/second
Diesel site Total bitrate = 3199 kbps Frame rate = 29 frames/second

To increase the bit rate by a factor of 3.2, you are increasing the file size from 686 MB to 2.08 GB.

I don't know how these technical details play out. But as far as I can tell, you can't really tell the difference on a computer monitor that is 20+ inches in size between the 3199 kbps and 10136 kbps files.

Maybe on a large-screen TV monitor, you can tell the difference. But you are going to be spending hundreds of dollars on hard drives, as cheap as they are today, if you are going to collect videos that are 2GB in size.

If you enjoy the erotic massage niche, then I suggest signing up with the Teen Mega World network, where you get one site (Tricky Masseur) that focuses on that area, with 93 videos. Plus you get over 20 other hardcore sites that are mainly boy-girl sex, some solo vids, some lesbian vids.

All the Rub A Teen videos (except possibly 1 video) are at Tricky Masseur. And Tricky Masseur has over 4 times the videos that Rub A Teen does.

Basically, I think it makes little commercial sense to build a site that is a clone of a competitor's site. But I guess that the owners of Rub A Teen decided that the erotic massage niche was popular, and this is what they came up with as an inexpensive way to do it, because they are just buying/leasing some of the same videos that Tricky Masseur bought/leased.

For people who don't know about Tricky Masseur, then the Rub A Teen site can be a nice introduction to the erotic massage niche.

Rub A Teen is part of the Team Skeet network. Joining any one of their sites gives
access to 11 sites in that network, which currently consists of: Exxxtra Small-Her Freshman Year-Innocent High-Oye Loca-POV Life-Self Desire-She's New-Solo Interviews-The Real Workout-This Girl Sucks-Titty Attack.

I'm giving the Rub A Teen site a score of 73. If the Tricky Masseur site didn't exist, the Rub A Teen site score would be much higher.

12-02-12  10:45pm

Replies (1)
Review
17
Visit Erotic Beauty

Erotic Beauty
(1)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -High end, glamor style photos of teen and early twenty models.
-Easy login. No captcha.
-Long time before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-Access to live cams.
-Good download speeds. I usually max out my download speed of 1.3MB/sec.
-Easy site navigation. There are a lot of photosets, but it's fairly easy to look through the site to see what you like.
-Each photoset comes in 3 definitions: low, medium, high.
-Download managers work. I use DownThemAll, which works here.
-If you are a member, you can get a discount to other sites in the network through their upgrade option.
-Content is exclusive.
-No watermark on their photos.
-You get a large number of photographers contributing to this site. I think they are
all basically high-end glamor style shoots, with not a large variation in styles, but you get to see how different photographers use this approach.
-The models are clean. Almost no tatoos. Very little piercing.
Cons: -Cons are basically minor. If you like high-end teen softcore glamor photosets, you will probably like this site.
-No videos. Photosets only.
-A few models have more than one name. So if you want to set all their sets, you need a bit of luck to find them.
-The site advertises itself as using amateur models. I think that's misleading. You get a large number of models who have appeared at different porn sites. I think a better description would be that these are attractive young girls that you would like to see more of.
-You get a model bio for each girl, but the bio is very short, with few details.
-Site advertises "Over 10,000 Breathtaking Beauties". I doubt that. MetArt, which has
been around about 6 more years than Erotic Beauty, advertises 2,730 models, and MetArt
updates about 4-6 photosets per day, compared to 1 per day for Erotic Beauty. So Erotic Beauty might have 1,000 models at the site, or less.
Bottom Line: Site statistics:
Number of videos: 0
Number of models: hundreds+

The dimensions of the recently posted photosets:
low definition: 680 x 1024 pixels
medium definition: 1361 x 2048 pixels
high definition: 2000 x 3008 pixels or 2832 x 4256 pixels

This is part of the Met Art Money network. That includes:
Met Art
Erotic Beauty
Sex Art
The Life Erotic
Met Cams
Rylsky Art

You have to join each site separately. You can't join one, and automatically get access to another site in the network. But as cjd2004 pointed out, there is an option to join all the sites in the network at once at signup.

Erotic Beauty used to be called Metmodels. I assume they changed the name to further distinguish itself from MetArt, so people won't automatically compare the two sites to see which site offers the better value.

Erotic Beauty is actually like a smaller sister of MetArt:
MetArt offers up to 6 new updates per day. Recently they have been offering around 4 updates per day. Almost all the updates are photosets, but they usually offer 1 or 2 new videos per week.

Erotic Beauty offers 1 new photoset per day. No videos at the site.

MetArt has a huge collection of models and photosets (and videos, but the videos basically have little value, because they are almost all boring, in spite of featuring lovely young models in the nude).

Erotic Beauty has a large collection of models and photosets, but much smaller than what MetArt has.

If you haven't been a member of either MetArt or Erotic Beauty, the better value is obviously MetArt, because of the greater amount of content at MetArt. But if you've already seen MetArt, and haven't seen Erotic Beauty, and if you like the MetArt content, then Erotic Beauty is definitely worth a visit, because you will find similar content in the photosets at Erotic Beauty.

Almost all the models are in their teens or early twenties. Most are Causcasian. You have a pick of attractive to lovely or gorgeous girls to look at. This is a high-end teen glamor softcore photo site. It doesn't get much better than this. MetArt, Erotic Beauty, MPL Studios, Femjoy are some of the best in the field.

11-27-12  12:00pm

Replies (6)
Review
18
Visit Rocco Siffredi

Rocco Siffredi
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Can stream or download videos.
-They have links to porn review sites, including TheBestPorn.
-They have a short bio for Rocco Siffredi, the male star of the site. It lists his favorite drink (Vodka Martini, just like James Bond), and other facts that his fans might find interesting.
-There is an online store, where you can buy the latest DVDs featuring Rocco Siffredi, the Italian stallion (he was born in Italy, but now resides in Hungary).
-Easy login. Just need username and password, which can be saved. No captcha required.
-Can easily switch between sites in the network. Do not have to re-enter your username and password.
-PU discounted price of $14.95/month recurring.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Part of the netFameSolutions network. You get over 20 sites included with membership.
Some of the bonus sites are small, niche sites.
Cons: PROS (CONTINUED):
But there are at least 5 major sites with a lot of good content. By good, I mean OK DVD quality videos, that are much lower in quality than videos at X-Art or 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn.
-Good download speeds. I regularly get about 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Can search for a model across all their sites. But the search will return the sites that the model's name appears at, whether that name represents a single model, or different models using that same name.
-The videos and photosets have the date they were posted to the site.
-Get a wide range of videos Rocco Siffredi has appeared in during his career, which spans more than 20 years. You don't get all of his work, but this guy has been in more than 450 porn films.
-Site updates with 1, 2, or 3 videos per week, along with matching photosets.
==================
CONS
-Many times they don't list some or all of the models in a video.
Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED):
-Many models don't have a thumbnail to show what they look like.
-For many videos, only choice is 240p or 480p. Some videos have a 720p or 1080p option.
-The video lighting and colors and camera work are just OK, but far below what you can get at sites like X-Art.
-The prices for videos at the online store, whether you purchase the DVD, or download to own, are expensive: DVDs cost about $60; a download of the DVD is about $50 (you own the file for your own personal playback).
A much cheaper alternative would be to join a pay site, and download the DVDs at that site.
-Watermark at bottom right corner of videos is large and very visible.
-They appear to rotate content. I've been a member at this site several times before, and there are videos that I used to see here that are no longer posted. They were Rocco videos, so there shouldn't have been any problem with the ownership. I guess they just drop some videos over time. I wish they wouldn't.
-They have a photoset accompanying each video. But the photos in many of the sets are screencaps.

=========================
BOTTOM LINE

Site Stats:
Movies: 1373
DVDs: 266
Pornstars: 1318
Pictures: 8214
HD movies: 413 (out of 1373 total movies)

Videos can be downloaded in 240p and 480p. Choice of MP4 or WMV download. Most videos do not have a higher definition download choice available. Some videos have a 720p and 1080p choice for download.

They have a photoset accompanying each video. But many of the sets are screencaps. I see little value in most photos, because they are not posed or framed by a professional photographer, not lighted by a professional photographer, the colors (skin tones, background sets) are ok to tell what is happening, but nothing to appreciate or respond to in an erotic way.

Some photosets at Rocco Siffredi are better than screen caps. An actual photographer took the photos. The photos are framed, they have good lighting, good colors, etc. They aren't the high quality you would find at a photo site like Met-Art or MPL Studios, but they are definitely better than screencaps. If you are a fan of Rocco
Siffredi, these photosets could have value for you as an addition to the video of the same shoot.

But again, I think the photosets based on videos posted at sites like X-Art, 18 Only Girls, or Young Legal Porn have higher quality, actual eroticism, much greater appeal, than any of the photos posted at Rocco Siffredi. The photosets posted at the other sites could be collected. But only a fan would appreciate or collect even the better photos posted at Rocco Siffredi.

There are tranny/she-male videos at Rocco Siffredi.I don't remember seeing them before at this site.

The WMV file is 30%+ or more larger than the MP4 version of the same video. I can't tell if the increased size gives a better definition or increased clarity. Both versions are supposed to be the same definition. So download the MP4 version, because it takes less space.

As I already mentioned, the videos are just OK in quality. These are taken from DVDs. The lighting and colors and camera work are OK, but far below what you can get at sites like the 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn or X-Art. You look at videos from 18 Only Girls from the last few years, and even the 480p videos just look so much better (better camera work, better focus, better lighting, better colors, etc.) than the videos at Rocco Siffredi.

Maybe some of the sloppiness is deliberate: maybe they are trying to create an effect that you are viewing scenes that are unscripted. But I much prefer videos that show they are professionally shot, that look sharp and well-lit with good to excellent skin tones.

The main sites in the netFameSolutions network include:
Devils Film
Peter North DVD
Rocco Siffredi
Silverstone DVD
Silvia Saint

Each of those sites contain a massive number of videos. A large portion of those videos are hot. The videos are OK in quality, but below what you will find at sites like X-Art. The videos are more like the quality you will find at Teen Mega World. Except that at Teen Mega World, I believe that camera work (focus, lighting, steadiness of camera, framing, skin tones, etc.) is actually slightly better than the videos at Rocco Siffredi.

In addition to the massive number of videos in many different categories you find at the 5 main sites, you also get access to a large number of videos in niche categories at other sites: including: lesbian, creampie, tranny, hairy, etc.

I'm giving the site a score of 80, because of the massive amount of video content and the wide range of categories you get access to. If they improved the video quality, improved the search to make the site easier to use, and put nice-sized thumbnails of all the models so you know what the models look like, and listed the
models in all their videos so you can tell what models appear in what videos, and did a few other upgrades to make the site easier to use, then the score would improve.

11-20-12  03:54am

Replies (0)
Review
19
Visit Lay The Kat

Lay The Kat
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Brief description given for each video and photoset to explain what is happening.
-The photosets are dated by the date they were posted to the site.
-Zip files for the photosets.
-Photoset zip files download with the default filename of the date the photoset was posted at the site. E.g., 03-09-07.zip or 11-09-2007.zip.
Cons: -Archive site. No updates since September 2007.
-Small site. 44 videos, 57 photosets.
-Only 2 models at the site: LayTheKat and her girlfriend.
-More models would add variety. More locations in the shoots would add variety. All the videos and photosets are basically shot in a house or apartment.
-Not much variety in what the photos and videos show. You have 1 or 2 girls, undressing, touching themselves or each other.
-The videos are not dated.
-No search function.
-No model bio.
-No streaming option.
-Videos download in one size only, one format only. No choice of low, medium, high for videos.
-Photos download in one size only. No choice of low, medium, high definition.
-Default filename for videos is "video.wmv". So have to rename video files, or you will overwrite the previous video you downloaded.
Bottom Line: The site is part of the Diesel Access network.

The site only has 2 models: LayTheKat and her girlfriend and sexual partner, a slender, slightly taller brown-haired girl. The site contents are videos and photos of LayTheKat and her girlfriend, exploring themselves and each other. They show nudity, masturbation, lesbian sex. A few brief videos of LayTheKat or her girlfriend peeing.
LayTheKat is a small, very slender young teen. She is a cute girl. She seems like a girl who is new to porn, a little embarrassed to be performing in front of a camera, but giving a good performance. And her emotions seem real: the embarrassment, the smiles, the sexual excitement she is feeling. Which adds a lot to the simple scenes, compared to the fake moans and groans of many porn models. The same is true for her girlfriend.

LayTheKat has additional photosets and videos at other sites in the Diesel Access network:

At Young Legal Porn, she is listed under the name of Kat, where she has 3 videos and 20 photosets.

At 18 Only Girls, she is listed under the name of Kat, where she has 17 videos and 33 photosets.

Site design/navigation is very basic. But because the site contents are so limited, it's fairly easy to look through the site contents. The contents are split into two groups: videos and photosets.

Video stats:
Number of videos: 44
Each video has only a single file for download, or is split into 2 parts for download.

Sample dimensions:
Height x Width: 852x480
Total bitrate: 4258 kbps

Photos stats:
Number of photosets: 57
Number of photos per photoset: 80+
Width x Height: 799x1200
or
Width x Height: 1198x1800

Considering that the latest videos were probably posted by 2007, the video quality is surprisingly high. There is good definition, excellent lighting, good colors and skin tones, good camera work, good focus, good framing, etc.

The photos were also well shot, by someone who knew how to use a camera. They are far better than screenshots. This is not glamor-style photography, but the images of the girls are clear and well-focused.

Bottom Line:
Unless you are a real fan of the model, LayTheKat, it's probably not worth getting a
membership to this single site. For one, the site hasn't updated since September, 2007. For another, it's a small site, with only a small number of videos and photosets, and even though the videos and photosets are good considering they are 5 years old or more, they were not the highest quality even when they were first posted.

However, if you get a general pass to all the sites in the Diesel Access network, it's worth looking the site over, to see if you can find any contents that you might like.

11-12-12  04:42pm

Replies (1)
Review
20
Visit Sugar Paradise

Sugar Paradise
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -The photosets and videos are dated by when they were posted to the site.
-The zip file for each photoset has the name of the model in the filename.
-There is a small bio for each model. Gives her name, age and hair color.
Also gives some background on the model, which is probably fiction.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Good download speed. I got 1.0 to 1.4 MB/sec at this site (which is my maximum download speed).
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Because the videos are so short (3 to 4 minutes runtime), the file size is very small: 50 MB or less.
Cons: -On login, have to enter a captcha, which is a moving string of 5 numbers. You have to watch the captcha for a minute or two, to try to read all the numbers, since the string is moving on and off the screen. Just a minor annoyance, but it indicates poor site design, along with a bunch of other site design problems. Logging into Met-art or Erotic Beauties, major porn sites, is so easy and effortless. Why can't other sites make it easy to log in?
-Archive site. Stopped updating in 2009.
-Although photosets download with the name of the model and a unique number, videos download with the default filename of "full.wmv" or "full.avi" (depending on whether you chose the wmv or avi file format).
So you have to rename each video you download, to know what model is in the video. And there's no description on the site of what the video is about.
-Navigation is very basic.
-No search function.
-Site only has 3 models. Very limited selection of models.
Bottom Line: This is a very softcore teen site.

Their model listing consists of 3 models:
Diana, brown hair
Liza, black hair
Nika, blonde hair

I thought at first I was mistaken. Where are all the different models? But those three models are used for all the photosets and videos. So if you
like those three models, you will find plenty of photos and videos with them.

There is very little eroticism. Very little touching themselves. No masturbation. Little or no spreading of the legs. This is really very
softcore. Met-art is the biggest teen softcore site there is, for photographs. But the Met-art photos, if you can imagine, are harder edged than what this site offers.

In a way, that's good. It almost makes you feel like a "clean" pervert looking at these innocent photos of naked teens.

No boys at this site interacting with the girls. This is a girl-only site.
In some of the photosets and videos, there are two girls. But the only touching between the two girls is girly innocence. I mean, these girls
hardly ever kiss the other girl softly on the lips. They are playing around, maybe touching one another's arm or leg. But really innocent. This
is the very softest of softcore.

Site statistics:

Photosets
Number of photosets: 167
Number of photos per set: around 70+
Each photo has 3 sizes: Low Res., Medium Res., Original size. The original size is between the low res and the medium res.
Original res dimensions: 800 x 1200 pixels, or 1500 x 1000 pixels
Each photoset has a zip file option. You can download a zip file in your choice of low res, medium res, or original size.

Number of videos: 88
Video runtime: 3 to 4 minutes.
Frame width x height: 720 x 480
Total bitrate: 6096 kbps

You can download the videos as WMV or AVI files.
There is no choice of definition for the videos. Videos download in one definition only.

The videos are really short. A lot of the videos have a runtime of 3 or 4

minutes. The video file size is small, 50 MB or less.

The videos have more tease to them than the photosets. There is stripping in the videos. But it's done in a girlish way, very innocent, not even midcore, just young teens taking off their clothes and playing in an innocent manner to an unseen audience. No sex, no masturbation, very
little touching of their own body, no spread legs, no close-ups of the groin or ass.

The videos are poor to just OK. The girls go in and out of focus, which is annoying. This is not an artistic effect, but the camera operator just
can't keep the model in focus, even though she is barely moving from one spot to another. The camera operator is definitely not a professional.

There is no story line to the videos, it's just a girl or 2 girls getting naked, moving around, flashing parts of their bodies. They are interacting with the camera, being teasing, but innocent.

The lighting is OK, the colors are OK. These are scenes shot indoors, so the lighting is easily controlled, and there is little or no annoying
random noises in the soundtrack. The soundtrack is canned music, which I wouldn't mind hearing eliminated. But I've heard worse canned music.

The site design and navigation is basic but acceptable. There is no search function. But you have pages listing the photosets, and other pages
listing the videos. The listing shows what model (or sometimes 2 models) is in the photoset or video. But there is no description of what the
photoset or video is about. But then again, it's basically a girl getting undressed, and flashing her body at the camera. That's it. No script, or
story.

I am giving this site a score of 70. But I think, unless you know that this is a very softcore site, with just 3 teen models, and that it hasn't updated in over 3 years, and that the photos and videos are poor or just OK in technical quality, you will be disappointed you spent your money on this site.

10-15-12  11:54pm

Replies (11)
Review
21
Visit Pearl Teens

Pearl Teens
(0)

63.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -The only reason I am writing pros is because PU wants a balanced review. But basically, this site has little or no value. Anyone who subscribes to this site is wasting their time and money.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-DownThemAll manager works at this site.
-Good download speeds. I get 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Some videos can be downloaded as either MPG or WMV files. Some videos only have a WMV option.
Cons: -Zip file for each photoset downloads with the default filename of "gallery.zip". So you have to rename the zip to know what photoset you have downloaded.
-Video files download with a generic default filename. So you have to re-write the filename to know what the video is. And since the model is not usually identified, and there is no description of what the action is, you make up your own description if you want to save the file.
-No streaming option to view the video before downloading it. So, you have to download each video and play it, before you can decide if the video is worth viewing or saving.
-But there are only 13 videos at this site, and none of them are worth saving. Or even viewing.
-Only have one option for the videos and photosets for definition. No high, medium or low choices.
-The photosets and videos are very low definition.
-This is an archive site. No updates in years.
-Tiny site. 13 videos. 55 photosets.
-Navigation is primitive.
-No search.
Bottom Line: CONS(continued):

-No posting date for videos or photosets.
-No model bio data.
-No models are named in any of the photosets.
-A few models are named in a few of the videos. But most of the models in the videos are not named.
-The video files are very low definition.


BOTTOM LINE:

Site stats:
Number of videos: 13
Video size: 320x240 352x240 720x480
Total bitrate: 712 kbps 1628kbps
Different video files will have their own specifications. You don't get a choice of specifications. Most of the videos have the low 320x240 size. A few have 720x480, but even then, the video is poor, maybe from lack of focus or other factors.

Number of photosets: 55
Photo dimensions: 768x1152p or 1024x683p
Number of photos per set: 33 to 141

This is a hardcore teen site.
This is an archive site. The content was made years ago.


You get better looking photos at archive sites like My Precious Vigins and Teen Stars Magazines, as well as better looking models at those other sites.

If you like this style of photography, Amour Angels is a site that is still updating, and has superior photography and more attractive models, as well as superior site design.


There are some cute models at this site, and their photosets are OK. Not great, but OK. And if you're already a member, it's pobably worth saving some of their sets for completeness.
The videos are worthless, because of the low definition. Even if some of the models are cute, the picture is so poor no PU member would waste his time watching these videos.

Bottom line:
Because of the small amount of content, the poor quality of the content, poor site design, most PU members would give this site a miss.

09-22-12  07:59pm

Replies (5)
Review
22
Visit Magic Porn

Magic Porn
(0)

61.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Content is dated. The video dates range from November 2006 thru November 2008. The photosets are from 2007 and 2008.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Can download the videos.
-Zip file for each photoset.
-Good download speeds. I get 1.3MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-DownThemAll file manager works at this site.
Cons: -Primitive site layout.
-No search.
-Archive site. No updates.
-Videos are from years ago. The definition is very low.
-Videos download with the default filename of full.avi or full.wmv. So you have to re-name each download, or else the succeeding videos will either over-write the previous video, or it won't download. Also need to rewrite the filename so
you know what the video is about.
-No model bios.
-Models not named in the videos or photosets.
-No streaming option for videos. Have to download the file to watch.
-Only one definition for each video.
-Only one definition for each photoset.
-You have a thumbnail illustrating each photoset and video. But the thumbnail is so small, and such poor quality, you don't really know what the model looks like.
Bottom Line: Videos:
Number of videos: 106
Width by height: 360x240 or 288x216
Total bitrate: 1340 kbps or 216 kbps
Runtime: 8 to 23 minutes


Photosets:
Number of photosets: 532
Number of photos per photoset: 70 to 170
Photo: 370x560 pixels or 600x336 pixels or 768x1024 pixels

This is a hardcore teen site.

Because of the low definition of the videos, they are only useful as a reminder of the early days of internet porn. No one who has access to most internet porn sites today would want to watch, or be satisfied with, the low-definition videos available at this site.

I didn't save a single video from this site. The girls might be attractive, but they are so blurry, and the videos are so low-definition, it's just a waste of time looking at them.


The photosets are like screenshots. The photoset is usually like a video-capture of a video shoot. So there is no posing for best effect, no artistic or sensual value to the photos. The colors are poor.

The truth is, I've been spoiled by the good and fine and excellent quality of the videos and photosets at today's porn sites. Looking at the content of this site makes me realize how far we've come in a few short years. This site might
have some curiosity value. But comparing the contents to what is available at other sites, this site is a waste of time and money.

09-18-12  12:48am

Replies (5)
Review
23
Visit Best Fucked Teens

Best Fucked Teens
(0)

63.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Zip files for photosets.
-Can download videos as AVI or WMV files.
-Can download a video as a single file, or download segments of the video.
-Can use a download manager. I used DownThemAll.
-Good download speeds. I regularly got about 1.3MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
Cons: -Content not dated.
-The zip file for a single photoset offers only one size definiton. There is no low, medium, high quality choices.
-The models in the photosets are not named.
-You only get a single, low-definition choice for the videos. No medium or high definition option. And the low-definition is really poor, 400x300.
-The photosets download with the default filename of "gallery.zip". So you have to rename each download, or the following zip files either won't
download, or will over-write the previous "gallery.zip" file.
-The captcha on login is hard to read.
-No search function.
-Navigation is basic.
-I found no videos worth keeping.
-The photos are better quality than the videos, but I found no photos worth keeping.
-No streaming. Have to download a video to watch it.
-No model index.
-No model bios.
-Some WMV video files can't be played, because neither Windows Media Player or VLC Player could recognize the file's input.
Bottom Line: Site specs:

Number of videos: 38
Average runtime of video: from 10 to 40 minutes.
Videos can be downloaded in AVI and WMV format.

AVI files:
400x300 width x height.
1,213 kbps total bitrate

WMV files:
400x300 width x height.
1,214 kbps total bitrate

Number of photosets: 219
Average number of photos per set: from 25 to 40.
Photo dimensions: 768x1024 pixels.

The number of photosets seems large. Certainly far larger than the 38 videos. But the reason for the large number of photosets is that photos of
a single video shoot are often separated into a number of photosets, so that the site contents appear larger. A single photoset is small, usually between 20 and 40 photos.

This is a hardcore teen site.
This is an archive site. Even though the content is not dated, I believe the content was shot years ago.

The video quality is poor. There are many reasons for the poor video quality. The main factor is the low definition of the videos. You only get
one definition in the video, and this is such a low definition that you see lines in the video on playback. This is such a low-definition video
that it's lower than the lowest definition offered at major sites like Teen Mega World or Nubiles. The colors in the videos are poor. The
costumes the models wear are cheap. The sets are cheap.

The models can be good looking, and they can put on a good show sexually. But they are wasted in these low-quality videos.

The photos are better quality than the videos. The video quality is just awful. The photos are decently photographed softcore and hardcore. Not
artistic, or sensual, but ok shots of hardcore action. The photos are low-definition, very little production values, but still better than the god-awful videos.

This site's contents might have had some value maybe 10 years ago. But compared to what is being offered today at other teen sites, this site is a waste of time and money.

Truthfully, you will find better quality videos at free tube sites than what you can find at this site.

09-09-12  03:52am

Replies (0)
Review
24
Visit Exclusive Teen Porn

Exclusive Teen Porn
(0)

71.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Most photosets have zips for high, medium, and low res.
-Can search by name of model, by tag (such as blowjobs), etc.
-Each photoset and videos is illustrated with a nice-sized thumbnail of a scene from the shoot, which gives a view of the model. The thumbnails
could be higher quality, but it gives you a basic idea of what the model looks like.
-Content is dated, by when the content was posted to the site.
-Most video shoots have a matching photoshoot. This is good and bad. It increases the content for each girl. But the photoshoots are basically a photo capture of the video shoot. And the photoshoot could easily be improved by using professional makeup on the model, as well as having a professional photographer taking the pictures, so the photos would be better posed, better framed, be more erotic or attractive.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Can stream or download videos.
-Videos can be downloaded as AVI or WMV files.
Cons: PROS(CONTINUED):
-DownThemAll download manager works.
-Good download speeds. I regularly got 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.

CONS:
-Video files download with the file name "full.avi" or "full.wmv". So you have to rename each file, or succeeding files won't download into the same folder destination. Also have to re-name the file so you know who the model is, and what the video shows.
-Most photosets are a photo shoot of the corresponding video shoot. So the model is not posed to her best advantage. The model's make-up is not professionally applied. The photos are better than screen caps, but not by much. The photos are not high quality or professionally shot.
-You have some very attractive or cute or lovely models, but the photosets do not take advantage of the model's attractiveness. A wasted opportunity.
-The number of sets per model is completely random.
-Captcha is a little tricky. Could be easier to read.
Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED):
-Site navigation is primitive. Makes you wish for sites like Teen Mega World, Diesel network, or any other site that is well-designed and easy to use.
-Quality of vids and photosets varies from poor to just OK. Makes you wish for high quality sites, or even just good quality.
-Occasionally some links don't work. You click on a link to stream a model's video, and you get a more-or-less blank page instead of the streaming video.
-Update rate: Slow. One video and one photoset per week.
-Even though streaming a video is easier than downloading the file, the stream degrades the picture slightly. So you are better off downloading the video and playing the file, for better quality viewing. But video quality at Teen Mega World is better. And the video quality at Diesel network and sites like X-Art is even more superior.

BOTTOM LINE:
Site stats:
Number of videos: 210
Runtime: averages about 21 minutes.
Videos can be streamed or dowloaded.
Download as WMV(1280x720) or AVI(1280x720) files.
The file specs are for the more recent files.

Number of photosets: 217
Number of photos per set: about 120 - 160 photos.
Zip files for high, medium, and low resolution.
The difference in resolution between the high and medium and small is large:
High resolution photo: 5616x3744 pixels
Medium resolution photo: 1666x2500 pixels
Small resolution photo: 682x1024 pixels

On the high resolution photo size, you have each photo taking up 6 MB or more, with attractive models, and the photos are a waste of space: the
models don't appear attractive, the shots are not professionally framed, the film colors are not vibrant, etc.

On the small resolution photo size, each photo takes up 200 KB or more space, which until a few years ago would have meant a high resolution
photo. And the photos are just a waste of space: poorly photographed photos, with no production values. Shot by an amateur who has no feel or
artistic talent. You are shooting lovely girls, and ruining the opportunity, because the photos have no value.

Number of models: 177

There are a large number of Eastern European teens, many of which are featured at other porn sites like Teen Mega World, Diesel, Nubiles. The
same models are presented more attractively at the other sites: Better photography, better videos, better makeup, better costumes.
Even the recent content looks like it was shot by an amateur. A really home-made feel, and that is not a compliment.

Navigation is primitive, making it hard and time-consuming to search the site.

Bottom line: In spite of many attractive teen models, this is a poor choice.

09-06-12  03:36am

Replies (2)
Review
25
Visit Sasha Blonde

Sasha Blonde
(0)

79.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Sasha is cute blonde, with fun-loving personality.
-Credit card processor: CCBILL.
-Sasha sometines appears on the Diesel Girls Live, a live chat show. Not only is it free, but you get some nudity, often get to watch the girl
posing and masturbating. Some of the shows are worth watching.
-If you are a member of the Diesel network (instead of being signed up to just one site of the Diesel network), you can switch between sites by clicking on the hot link for a video or photoset at another site. You don't have to log in to each site separately.
-Recent update rate is one video or photoset per week.
-Long time before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-Good download speeds. I get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Zip files for photosets.
-Can stream or download videos.
-The content (videos and photosets) are dated.
Cons: -If the model Sasha does not appeal to you, the site will have little value.
-Some of the videos appear to be re-mastered from older material. So the quality doesn't match what you would expect from the definition. The video can be poorly framed, sometimes out of focus, poorly lighted, like an amateur video that's poorly shot.
-No model bio. Even though this is a single-model site, and Sasha appears in every video and photoset I saw, you would like to see more of Sasha's personality come through. Instead, you get a collection of her videos and photosets, but not much feeling.
Bottom Line: The main sites in the Diesel network are 18OnlyGirls and YoungLegalPorn.
But there are other sites in the network worth viewing. IvanaFukalot, SkinnySuperGirl, AliceWonderBang, NatashaShy, VikaNymph, SashaBlonde, and BeataPorn are sites with recent updates.

SashaBlonde is a cute skinny blonde. She's been doing porn starting in 2005, but she still looks like a young teen. She's featured at Metart, MetModels, Femjoy, the Diesel network, and other sites.

If you have a network pass at Diesel, Sasha has a lot of content at 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn, in addition to the SashaBlonde and
SashaFucksDasha sites that feature Sasha.

Number of videos: 431+
Number of photosets: 528+

Most videos have several download options:
WMV 1080p
MP4 1080p, 720p, 480p, 360p

Videos run from 4 to 20 minutes.
Photosets have from 40 to 80 photos per set.

Most photosets have 2 zip file options. 1000 px definition, and an original definition, which is a higher definition size.

Some photosets have 4000 px, 2000 px, 1000 px, plus an original size px.

You get this site if you sign up for the entire Diesel network. But unless you are a strong Sasha fan, it's probably not worth subscribing to this site by itself.

I was not impressed by the videos and photosets at this site, even though Sasha is a cute model.

08-21-12  02:32am

Replies (6)

Shown : 1-25 of 97 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.48 seconds.