Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : mbaya (366)  

Feedback:   All (1196)  |   Reviews (181)  |   Comments (136)  |   Replies (879)

Other:   Replies Received (714)  |   Trust Ratings (88)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 192 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit Ripping 4 Fun

Ripping 4 Fun

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill without regional pricing
-Unusual, maybe even unique premise for a website.
-Very hot English pornstars and models with sexy accents. There are a total of 156 on the site. Some that I recognized were Lucy Zara, Lolly Badcock, Angel Long, Cate Harrington, Rio Mariah, and Satine Sparks.
-Has a little ethnic variety. There was one Indian and five Black models.
-Excellent quality videos, but not HD. There were 287 videos, WMV only at 960x540, 4066kbps.
-High level of enthusiasm by the models.
-Models talk dirty directly at the camera.
-Most videos are hypnotic. It is difficult to turn away.
-270 photosets, zipdownloadable at 959x1442. Not screencaps, real photos.
-Updates every five days with a new video or photo set.
-Has a forum where they take suggestions, however it is not very active.
Cons: -Too many scenes only go to panties. This may be unfair, but many do go to full nudity. Why not all or at least most?
-Too much focus on destroying clothes that have already been removed.
-Only WMV for downloading or streaming with no options as to quality.
-Videos averaged about five minutes each.
Bottom Line: In spite of a few negatives, this was a thoroughly enjoyable website. I found the videos to be hypnotic, even addictive. That is rare in porn, at least for me.

The premise here is that sexy English pornstars and models cut and rip off their clothes while talking directly to you the viewer. The models show a high level of enthusiasm and the fun factor here is contagious. The direction and scripting are excellent for the most part.

The best videos have the women talking dirty about showing you what they have under their clothes and how much they enjoy putting on a show for you. At their best, these videos go to full nudity with a fair amount of tease, both visually and with words. I loved the scenes where the model pops the buttons on her blouse to reveal her bra, or even better her massive tits. I also loved scenes where the model rips or cuts off her panties to show it all. Unfortunately these are only about 25% of the videos.

The rest show only the models going as far as panties. While these can be hot, I found them to be somewhat unsatisfying. Great models with great bodies, but I was left wanting more. These videos are still very watchable though.

The focus is more on destroying great looking clothes than on stripping. Great if this is your fetish or maybe even if you have a fetish for certain clothing, but I do not. I want more full nudity, not scenes where too much time is spent on destroying either sleeves or clothing that has already been removed.

The outfits range from ordinary street clothes to officewear, to just about anything else you can name, even three scenes with bridal gowns. A few scenes have two models who strip each other. The clothing looks expensive and looks great on these women. The models look very sophisticated and classy.

The videos have several constants. One is great looking models. Another is a high level of dirty talking directly at the camera and you the viewer that builds up suspense. With very sharp, but not HD video quality, I found watching these to be very addictive. Even when they do not go to full nude, I could not take my eyes off the screen.

This is a standalone site. You don't get any extras either. If you think this may be for you, I very definitely recommend givng the site a try.

12-29-10  06:40am

Replies (1)
Visit Fantasy Female Fights

Fantasy Female Fights

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Unusual niche.
-Very attractive women for the most part.
-Sexy English accents.
-Nice quality videos. The most recent are 960x540, 4068 kbps. Not HD but sharp. Even the older videos are quite watchable.
Cons: -Some fake boobs and or tattoos.
-Poor acting, not very realistic fights.
-The dull photos don't do justice to the action. They are zipdownloadable, but only 960x1440.
Bottom Line: This is an unusual niche, so felt I had to cut it some slack regarding my score. Although there are a few other female fighting sites, few are any good.

In these videos we see British pornstars and nude models fight with each other. In many cases, they start off nude. In others there is a bit of clothing that comes off by the end of the fight. I liked these better.

The fighting is hesitant and definitely tentative. In only a few cases do these models really get into the spirit and show some real enthusiasm. Sometimes the action is so transparently not real that it would make a WWE wrestler blush-and that is not easy.

At about five minutes per video, I felt that they were long enough. Many of the videos were so similar that I thought that I had seen them before. Not true, its just that there isn't much variety in the plots.

The true plus here is the quality of the models. With cute English accents, they generally are quite pretty with bodies that make you forget about the negatives to the site.

My feeling is that the site is worthwhile if you enjoy topless,some full nudity, and almost no cases of lesbian sex. If you want more, Ultimate Surrender is a much better site.

12-22-10  08:52am

Replies (5)
Visit Figure Baby

Figure Baby

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCbill, no regional pricing.
-Good value for the price.
-The big size downloads are sharp 2400x1600.
-Zipdownloadable photo sets.
-Real looking models, not glamour.
-Mostly ordinary looking clothing, some are the clothes the models arrived in.
-Most photo sets are a nice progression of clothed to full nude, many are spread at the end.
-Frequent updates.
-Nice mix of landscape and portrait photos.
Cons: -Videos are few and not erotic. Most have the models doing everyday things.
-Many, but not most, models have tattoos and/or piercings.
Bottom Line: Since so many others have reviewed this site, I will try not to repeat what they have said.

The site promises "a collection of beautiful women, artistic nude photography, and a spirit of fun. We update 3 times a week, so you're never bored. There's always something new to see."

"FigureBaby features the girl next door, or the woman who could be. Inside you'll find natural, everyday women, the same as you might see on the bus, at the mall, or in the park. Except here they're naked.

Never dull, FigureBaby is about simple fun. We emphasize a positive spirit, and a playful personality in all our photographs. If you're tired of average pictures and tired or bored looking models, your search is over. Come smile with the models of FigureBaby. And maybe even laugh."

Do they deliver what they promise? I believe they do.

The focus here is on real looking models that you won't find on every site. Some are nude art models, and the posing is interesting. As you would expect with amateur type models, a few were plain and some were outstanding. There was a wide variety of cup sizes from A to about C. There were two ethnic models, as one was Black and the other Asian. There was not much variation in age or body types though.

The site has a few kinds of photo sets. One kind seems to be professional as there is a colored background and the poses are pretty standard for that type. Some of these are overly artsy in that the explicit photos are few and in some sets there are none. The models hold a banana or an umbrella for example. Ok, but not my cup of tea.

Another kind they call "stolen moments". These appear to be solo masturbation scenes without toys, only fingers. Sounds erotic, but they are not, nor are they explicit.

Another kind is artsy black and white. I hated these. I know what I want to see and it certainly is not artistic b/w.

The best sets were the ones in various rooms inside a house. There was a progression from clothed to nude in nearly all cases, as some started off nude. The degree of explicitness I found satisfying, but the focus is most definitely on girl next door types taking off clothes you would see them wear in the street. These photo set types are the most common on the site, maybe about 2/3, and make the site worthwhile.

For the price this is a fine site. With three updates a week it is a bargain.

12-16-10  07:40am

Replies (2)
Visit Public Flash

Public Flash

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Nice discount for joining through TBP.
-Nice balance of attractive models of all ethnicities, ages and body types.
-Constantly adding new clips. About an entire video per week.
-A very large archive at 205 videos.
-Some pornstars. Besides those that Rearadmirable recognized there is a great scene with one of my favorites, Laurie Vargas. She started in porn scenes three years before she appeared here and Amber Rayne one year before she appeared here. Neither has this sites videos listed in their video histories that I read about online.
Cons: -All videos come as clips only. There should be an option for downloading the entire video.
-Low quality non zipdownloadable photos.
-Many older videos are of such low quality that they are not worth downloading.
Bottom Line: Thanks to Rearadmiral's review I decided to go back to this site. His review is a very complete and accurate description, so I will try to avoid repeating what he said. I was last a member in August 2008. I liked the content, but the videos were not up to the quality I wanted. On an HD screen they were quite grainy.

Since March of 2010, the newest videos are shot in 1280x720, 4220kbps. Those are the specs for HD, but they aren't very sharp. There is a poll question on the site about an upgrade to 1920x1080. They have upgraded the older videos, but they could be much better.

What I really like here is the sense of fun on the site. The camera woman Kyndra, or Special K as she also calls herself, is unabashedly a lesbian and loves her work. She makes her models feel sexy by continuously complimenting them throughout the videos. Her style is much more that of a facilitator than of a director. She doesn't really tell the models what to do; she suggests in a way that makes them feel that they are daringly having naughty, exhilirating fun. They seem to get a natural high, a special thrill from showing off. The level of joking, smiling and laughing makes the site stand out from other flash sites. She makes them want to ever do more by continuously interacting with them. You get the feel that the two are having a conversation. The danger is that sometimes Kyndra is at the point of saying too much. A blabby camerawoman can get as dull as any blabby cameraman. However, she generally seems to say just enough to make the videos a hot experience for us viewers.

The videos range from flashing in secluded locations to opening up in front of total strangers who give their consent. Sometimes the models enter into work locations such as repair shops, stores , etc. The lighting there can be hit or miss. I feel that most of the best videos are shot outdoors. While there is a lot to be said about the daring spontaneous nature of the content, you also have some downsides. Lighting may prevent the viewer from getting details in closeups and sometimes the camerawork is a bit of a drawback. Kyndra is holding the camera in her hands, not a stationary tripod. The videos reflect her being unsteady, especially if she gets enthusiastic or nervous about getting caught. Flashing in public is illegal, as I am sure you know. . This leads to too much camera movement with not enough focus. Sometimes there is a lot of wasted video until a good location is found, so you may find yourself fast forwarding a bit.

As far as the photos, most are not at all related to the videos. As best as I can tell, none have been added since I was a member over two years ago and the lack of quality is evident. They are not zipdownloadable and come in at about 600x800.

My general impression is that the site is REAL reality television at its best. These videos surely beat the usual garbage that gets that title. At the TBP discounted price it definitely is worth a membership.

12-03-10  01:10pm

Replies (5)
Visit India Uncovered

India Uncovered

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Part of large network of 22 sites and some streaming bonus sites. However, no other site in the network has a focus on any exotic women, let alone Indians.
-Recent videos are true HD at 1280x720, over 3000 kbps. Very sharp. Only 15 are HD, 29 are not. The low quality videos are barely watchable at all.
Cons: -No full movie download option, only clips.
-Photo sets are not zipdownloadable.
-Photos are decent at 1200x1600. Good quality, but many sites have better.
-Models are mostly only moderately attractive. They appear to be real amateurs.
-The site needs real growth. At the moment it is too small. I went through all the content in only a few hours.
-Updates at one clip per week, which comes to only about a scene and a half per month.
-Movie clips do not have unique file names.
Bottom Line: If there is a way to sum up this site, it is that it is real.

The models, both male and female are real Indians. There is no doubt about this when you see the content here. Not only that, they are recognizable as being from south India, where the people are darker. In some videos, they speak English with an Indian accent, but in most they speak in their native languages.

They appear to be real amateurs. Some are a bit plain, a few have great bodies and/or gorgeous faces. No way would you confuse these models with pornstars. The models are usually noticeably nervous in front of the camera. As you would expect with amateurs, it takes a while for the women to get into the scene. There is a lot of foreplay that seems genuine and unrehearsed. Sometimes there is some chemistry between the models and sometimes their natural shyness and discomfort comes across.

This type of materiel is rare. Indians find the whole idea of porn to be completely outside their culture. In India, you can get arrested for watching or possessing porn. Being in a video is unbelievably risky behavior both legally and socially. The best part is, it is in HD for the newer videos. Since there is so little genuine Indian material on the internet, this alone makes this site worth joining.

The videos have an appealingly genuine quality. The level of foreplay alone takes these videos to a place few websites can match in trying to be natural and unrehearsed. Real people, real sex.

The sex itself is not formulaic. Specifically, you don't get the same sequence of sex acts in every scene. However, you do see a lot of anal and oral. There are no creampies, but many shots where the guy comes on the woman's body. Reminds me of older porn movies. Also, there are no masturbation videos or lesbian ones.

Sometimes the videography could be better. They occasionally try some strange angles from underneath that simply do not work. However, mostly the focus is on the action, just where it belongs. It just isn't that slick, completely professional style that you see in gonzo flicks.

I found the site fun and interesting. I felt teased as I just wanted to see so many more videos. The photo sets were a nice plus and used the same models for both hardcore and softcore.

11-24-10  11:15am

Replies (2)
Visit Secretease


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Inexpensive with two day, twelve day and monthly options.
-CCbill without regional pricing.
-High quality photos at 3000x2009.
-Photo sets are zipdownloadable. BUT, there is a daily limit of 16 photo sets.
-Long strip sets that end in explcit shots. Not really nude as the models usually still wear some clothing.
Cons: -No videos, only photo sets.
-Many sets end with less than explicit nudity.
-The site is still too small. With photo set updates every four days, eventually this site will get much bigger.
Bottom Line: Like many sites from the UK, this one focuses on clothing and teasing. The outfits are sexy, most models are sexy, but not outstanding.

One big negative is that the site is just too small to stay more than at most the 12 day trial. With updates every four days, it should become a bargain at this price in 2011.

Another negative is that there is a daily download limit on zipdownloading the sets. I got only three models as the limit is 16 sets. I found this when I reached the limit, as the site nowhere mentions this. I would appreciate knowing the rules before I sign up, not after. I did not find any limit on individual photos though. As the site grows, this will become increasingly tedious.

For me another negative is that there are too many fake blondes. Most of the models on the site are reasonably attractive, but there just aren't many knockouts out of the 25 models.

What I did like were the slow strip sets. The feeling is one of building up as you go along. With well done photography, I enjoyed the quality of the photos.

Overall not a bad site for the price.

11-07-10  09:40am

Replies (4)
Visit Freak Bukkake

Freak Bukkake

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Billed through Epoch.
-No regional billing.
-Discounted price through TBP.
-Part of large network of 37 websites, admittedly some are tiny. In total they say there are 800 scenes, 15,000 minutes, 900,000MB and over 250 models in the network.
-Newer videos are on the low end of HD at 1280x720, and 3154kbps. Unfortunately there aren't enough of these.
-Photos are zipdownloadable.
-Attractive women, mostly in a very natural way. No fake boobs, but a few have some tattoos or hardware. A very unglam, non pornstar site.
-The women are from Spain.
-Fairly good videography. No weird angles and they seem to focus on the right visuals. No shots of the chair or the wall. No focus on the guys faces or other distractions that ruin many porn videos.
Cons: -Photos are low quality screenshots.
-Not download manager friendly. I could not use Freedownloadmanager or Internetdownloadmanager. IDM seems to be able to download nearly everything I try, but not on this site.
-Updates are irregular and too few. So far in 2010 there have been 4, in 2009 only 3, in 2008 11. Definitely needs growth.
Bottom Line: For this site I think that the TBP policy of not factoring in pricing is completely wrong. For only $14.95, you get a small site with a few very nice quality videos. Since you are paying nearly a dollar for each video, what exactly do you get?

Well, you get a decent size network. In that context, it doesn't seem overly expensive. The videos on this site are low end HD quality. Not the best I have seen, but up to today's standards.

The women are not jaded pornstars and never overact. They appear to be in the first or close to their first scenes and act accordingly. They seem excited or at least interested, not bored. In many cases they say that they are a bit nervous. Very real and very believable.

The guys often wear masks or bandannas to cover their faces. Since the camera almost never focuses above their waists, I feel this is not a negative. If anything, you get the feeling that these are just regular guyslike you or me who got lucky enough to be in the scene.

As far as the content, it compares favorably with Japanese bukkake scenes. The Japanese ones generally feel mechanical and rote. The women are only there to be unwilling sex objects to cum on. These videos do not have this feeling.

Another point is that both are in foreign languages. The Japanese don't use subtitles, so you miss a lot of whatever interaction and personality that a scene may have. In contrast, these videos are shot in Spanish, but have subtitles in English. Sometimes that can be distracting, sometimes the subtitles are a plus.

Further there is a lot of presex foreplay with multiple guys groping the women. Mostly rubbing, these guys seem to enjoy feeling them on their asses, breasts, etc., just like any guy would. In the Japanese videos there is also a lot of groping, but it feels as though the women don't want them to do it. It looks like they are being mauled by a gang, not participating in mutual foreplay.

American as well as Euro bukkake sites and DVDs seem to be about quantity of cum and having huge numbers of men in the scene. To me, scenes like this are more like a factory and less like fun. Very mechanical and uninspired, what you see is more or less an assembly line. On the other hand, these average about 10 or 12 guys, which is enough. Some of these scenes even have two women. In my book this site does it right.

These scenes are a bit extreme in that the women drink all the cum. Some do it straight from the cock and some do it from a bowl. Either way, no cum is wasted. There is never any feeling of the women being forced to do anything, or that they are degraded or humiliated. The dialog is respectful.

My only real complaint is that the site is too small. The rest of the network somewhat makes up for that.

10-24-10  08:22am

Replies (0)
Visit Anal Nippon

Anal Nippon

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Nice discount through TBP.
-Part of a network of 17 Japanese sites. Easy navigation between network sites wihout reentering passwords.
-No download limits.
-Download manager friendly.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded with MP4, MPEG or as small files AVI for the best quality videos. Nice and sharp but not HD.
-Low quality screencaps can be downloaded as a zipfile.
-Plenty of hot women.
-Very large site. As of today has 580 videos.
-Updating about twice a week.
-NO MOSAICS, blurring,completely uncensored. Porn where you see everything.
Cons: -Incomphrehensible dialog. Everything is in Japanese without subtitles.
-Only listed in date order. The site is ok to navigate as long as you are not looking for a particular video or star.
Bottom Line: In spite of its name, the videos are not only about anal. There is every kind of sex here, both vaginal and oral. Many videos don't even have any anal at all. I found bukkake, blow jobs,gang bangs, many scenes with enemas,even lesbian scenes.

The best point about the site is that the videos are completely uncensored. I love Japanese creativity and now you get see it in all its glory.

Many scenes are just sex, some have a little plot. The sex is usually a guy or a group of guys practically raping a reluctant female who eventually gives in with some pressure or forcing. Not violent, it just presents women as not being into sex all that much and men as using women as sex objects. On the other hand, there is almost always stimulation for the woman by hand, dildo, or mouth before the guys get any. Not exactly Western porn, but the women are certainly cute.

I really liked the scenes that were a little different, as just sex can degenerate into gonzo style same old, same old rather quickly.

Definitely worth joining the network for even this one site. Reasonably priced, plenty to see, a decent update schedule, attractive women, NO CENSORSHIP.

09-09-10  10:21am

Replies (6)
Visit Ass Teen Mouth

Ass Teen Mouth

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Part of network of 17 sites. The site mentions that you can access the 30 more sites of the jerkoffpass network, but that is not true.
-Bill through CCBill without regional pricing.
-No download limits
-Can use download managers
-Mostly very cute teenage models. As you may expect several are definitely first rate and others are too flat chested, plain faces etc. Common for teen sites.
-Although not mentioned on the site seems to be updating at about one per week. Presently 82 videos.
-Nice quality videos, the latest at 960x540, 3172kbps, but not HD. The photos are also nice but not great(1200x850).
-No talking at all. I think none of the talent here speaks any English.
Cons: -Very repetitive. Every scene is a clone of the same action, but with a different model.
-Only one male model. If you don't like him, you are not going to like the videos. I thought he was ok, not a plus or a minus.
-No way to search.
-Need a separate login each time you switch sites in the network.
-I wrote to customer service twice, no response. Once was about being unable to log in and the other was to ask how they can advertise access to sites I could not get into. See above.
Bottom Line: This site uses the same formula for its content in every video. First stripping, then sucking cock, then anal, then a facial finish. I like these, so it wasn't as bad as that sounds. If this is not for you, you already know if you would like the site.

By the way, the content is not what I would consider abusive. The models almost never seem to be bothered by the anal. True they don't love it, they just seem indifferent and merely going through the motions. Some have makeup that gets smeared, but I don't think that is even intentional. This is no way even remotely to be compared with a site such as facialabuse.com. I would hardly call the oral sex even forceful.

You also get a decent network of teen themed material. Several of the sites use the same ideas of oral and anal or just oral or just anal and the content looks like the same male model and the same females. No creativity.

The plus here is that the sex is with fairly attractive young models who seem to be into the sex enough for a porn site. No chemistry, no sizzle, nothing special. When you add in the other sites, you get a nice quantity of decent videos and pictures.

09-03-10  12:30pm

Replies (3)
Visit Japanese Flashers

Japanese Flashers

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Nice discount through TBP.
-Part of a network of 17 Japanese sites. Easy navigation between network sites wihout reentering passwords.
-No download limits.
-Download manager friendly.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded with MP4, MPEG or as small files AVI. Nice quality but not HD.
-Low quality screencaps can be downloaded as a zipfile.
-The Japanese manage to get great looking women into their movies. Paying them well and giving them respect makes hot looking women willing to do movies that are truly hot.
Cons: -Non exclusive. I have seen some of this before.
-The site is still small despite updates a few times a week.
-Some videos are not nude. I am not refering to the mosaics, I mean they don't take off clothing.
Bottom Line: This site features videos from Japanese DVD's. Most feature nudity, but some do not. None of the videos are uncensored and without a mosaic.

That being said, some of the videos work quite well and many do not. The problem with flashing even in explicit sites is that all you get is nudity. The ones that work would be great models for non Japanese porn as they take everyday situations, such as school graduations and fill the screen with half naked women as an example. Sometimes they are only topless and then the scene switches to only bottomless. The videos do that with other scenes, such as offices and classrooms. There are many group scenes of gymnastics, track and field, etc as well. This can be hot, but some scenes where women walk down the street seem unreal and staged.

Like other Japanese porn the creativity can make up for the lack of uncensored videos. This site is hit and miss as well as a bit small. If you like Japanese flashing join deluxepass.com. Not only is there a lot more of it in its own site within deluxepass, but it also includes most of what is on this site.

08-30-10  10:06pm

Replies (8)
Visit Nude Sport Videos

Nude Sport Videos

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -No regional billing even though it is through CCBill.
-Inexpensive three day full access trial. There is no need to spend more for a full month as you can get it all with a download manager. In my book this makes the site a bargain.
-Once a week updates in an archive of 241 videos, about a half hour each.
-Natural looking Russian amateurs. About as unglam as you can get. They are real, not overly made up plastic looking clones. However, the models are mostly very similar in body type and age and the content can get repetitive. Instead of porn star clones you get natural women who don't vary much either.
Cons: -Video quality could be a lot better. The stats show 1280x720, 4000 kbps for the best videos, but I suspect these are redone lower quality shoots.
-As you may expect with amateurs, many are very ordinary in their attractiveness. Like many non porn star websites, you have to search for the knockouts. There are some videos here that I really love.
-Sometimes slow downloads.
-Photos are not zipdownloadable.
-WMV is the only video option.
-No way to search. The videos are listed in date order. However, almost none of the models have more than one video.
-Turn the sound off as the background music is terrible.
Bottom Line: When I was twelve, the 19 year old next door used to dance and exercise nude. Sometimes she drew the shades and sometimes she did not. I think she secretly got off on me watching her. That makes nude exercise enough for me to love this site, although it is hardly perfect.

One thing I appreciate is that the models seem real. These are amateurs acting like amateurs. Sometimes they play up to the camera, and sometimes they just go through the motions. If they are showing me their bodies in an explicit way, I truly don't care if they are enjoying themselves. If a model shows me her pussy spread eagled, do I care if she is having a good time? It is all the same to me if they are an exhibitionist or just doing it for a paycheck.

In most of porn, I get the feeling that a scene I am watching is of people who fit the ideal of what porn producers think we like. Further they usually pretend they are having a good time and most of the time that involves bad acting. That seems so fake and artificial to me. It is obvious that on most porn sites the models are doing it for just a paycheck, but on this site you don't get bad acting in an obvious attempt to pretend otherwise.

A criticism I have of most softcore nude sites, think MetArt for example, is that the models are not erotic and just don't give that something extra that would work for me. Too much art, not enough erotic.With this site, you have movement that often teases in that you seldom know when you are going to get that great angle or that explicit shot. The teasing may not be intentional or played up, but you get it just the same. If you want to see a twenty year old on her back,opening and closing her legs, this is what you get. How about arching her back and pushing her pussy towards the camera after laying on the floor doing scissor kicks with her legs? Works for me.

If they only had better video quality I would give the site a higher score.

08-18-10  11:27am

Replies (11)
Visit Pure CFNM


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Mostly great looking hot women in great outfits that show off their legs or have partially open blouses that show cleavage. Some shots are upskirt showing their panties, which also is sexy. There is no explicit nudity, but plenty of tease.
-Many blowjob scenes by groups of women.
-Weekly updates.
-The archive goes back to 2005 with 228 scenes.
-Photoset for every video.
-Somewhat active forum that encourages members to suggest scenes as well as other improvements.
Cons: -Regional pricing through CCBill.
-The most recent updates are at 856x480, 3130 kbps. Nice but not HD.
-Photos recently are at 800x534 and are not zipdownloadable.
-Too many scenes are only handjobs.
-Sometimes their English accents are incomprehensible.
-Needs a search engine. Some models are in multiple scenes and the listings are only in chronological order.
Bottom Line: I was last a member of this site two years ago and decided to go back. Besides growing with one new scene added per week, the focus seems to have changed somewhat as well. There used to be many scenes of male humiliation, such as laughing at his small cock, leaving him unsatisfied and laughing as the models walk away, etc. There are still some recent updates with those themes, but not many. Now there are many more scenes of blow jobs, especially by groups of up to four women. In my book that is a distinct improvement.

The scenes seem to be male fantasies for the most part. A man wolf whistles at four women passing by and then they all give him a blow job for example. I feel the fact that they are clothed adds to the fantasy quality. I know not everyone agrees that clothed can be hot. Let's face it, who doesn't like to see pussy, ass and breasts? However, clothed gorgeous women makes a scene seem like it could really happen and that the women are pleased to make men get off. After all, in most scenes what are they getting out of it? They genuinely seem to be having fun, but no physical pleasure. Not a single fake orgasm on the site and no fake moaning either.

In many cases I wish that I could have seen the women's bodies as well. Most are nude on other English websites, so this is possible.

I feel that the site is the best I have seen in the CFNM(clothed female naked male)niche. Compared to others, the content as well as the women are hotter, but there is definitely a need for better quality videos and photos. At a minimum, the photos should be zipdownloadable.

08-13-10  07:23am

Replies (2)
Visit Exploited Black Teens

Exploited Black Teens

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Good size site with 372 videos.
-Cute teens. Some, maybe 25%, I recognize as pros, most I think did only this one video.
-Videos emphasize oral, but there is also some vaginal in nearly every scene. Cum on face is the norm.
Cons: -Regional billing through CCBill. However you can use Epoch and get the nonregional price.
-No Photos.
-No download choices. WMV only.
-No whole movie, just multiple short clips.
-Only POV. Sometimes makes for poor camera work as it appears the camerman is also the stunt cock.
Bottom Line: TBP states the site started in 2002. It certainly has the look and feel of a site from that time. It has not been maintained very well as many of the links on the site, such as favorites and upcoming scenes are not functional. Neither is the forum. Further, the site may not even be updating. It just doesn't say and the videos don't have dates. It has not updated in the three weeks I have been a member.

What you get here are POV videos of late teen to early twenties, very attractive black women. I was impressed by their looks as well as their performances. Definitely a nice plus. Some are pornstars and most I think are not. The stars look a lot younger than I have ever seen them in other videos, so I suspect that in many cases these were their first or nearly first videos.

However, the videos themselves have a lot of poorly done shooting as the cameraman is also the stunt cock. The result is that many scenes are just not as well done as they should be.

The 372 videos themselves are better quality than you might think when looking at the statistics. The most recent are WMV only 512x288, 1164 kbps. Although not HD, they really are quite watchable. On the downside, you get clips only, of about 2 minutes each. There is no option to download a whole movie and there are no photos. These areas need improvement.

Actually, the site needs a real overhaul of nearly everything to bring it up to 2010 standards. The attractiveness of the models and the sheer quantity of the videos makes for a site that is interesting enough, but not what it could be. The site bills itself as "The Undisputed Biggest Black Teen Site Ever". I believe this can very well be true. Considering how few sites feature black teens in interracial action, this is a site to check out if you find it appealing.

07-11-10  09:41am

Replies (0)
Visit Pantyhose Lane

Pantyhose Lane

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Daily updates of the photo section only.
-Good size site with 145 models and 33 guest models. Each has multiple shoots, so my guess is about 600 to 700 photosets.
-Most recent photos are 1200x1800.
-Although primarily a photo site, there are 125 video shoots as well. The most recent update is WMV 864x480, 595 kbps. Very weak and poor quality.
-Nice mix of mostly European and American models with a lot of Asian Americans and Black ones as well. If you love Asian women you will feel that you have died and gone to heaven.
Cons: -No zipdownloads.
-No easy way to search. Listings for photosets are under the models' names, in the order from the most recent update going back. You can also search by model name and a tiny thumbnail. Videos are listed separately, also in update order or in a separate listng of just videos. Only clips, no whole videos.
-Not updating the videos. There is no date on the site for each video, but the most recent is copyright 2009.
Bottom Line: Usually after downloading from a site, I gradually lose interest in the content. I get the feeling of been there, done that and it is on to the next website.

That didn't happen here. I wrote a review almost exactly a year ago and was primarily interested in the videos at that time. I did not appreciate the quality of the photography or its degree of erotic value. Gradually over the last year I have come to appreciate more the photos I downloaded and saved.

While the videos are of poor quality, the photo sets are nicely done. There is plenty of tease, as you might expect from a site with pantyhose in its name. Many of the outfits are quite classy and the stripping sequences work for me. While softcore, they often, but not always, go to full explicit. Sometimes there is complete nudity, but mostly you see before and after pussy shots of stripping off pantyhose. Some sets do not feature explcitness and the model stays clothed.

The model selection is first rate. You will recognize some familiar faces, but by no means all. Many are simply gorgeous, with great legs that are showcased in pantyhose. Many have nice breasts as well. Overall, very much glam in style, but with much more nudity and explicitness than for example Only Tease. The quality of the Asian women makes this site stand out. While the Americans and Europeans are also first rate, the Asian women alone make this site worth trying.

As far as a comparison with other pantyhose focused sites, much better looking models, more teasing and more delivery of explicitness. I feel it is the best in this niche.

I found the site to be fun and worth a shot if you are into softcore. Definitely a good value for a reasonable price. If they would make the photos zipdownloadable and added a decent way to search, I would not hesitate to give this site a score in the 90's.

06-27-10  08:57am

Replies (4)
Visit Fucking Gamble

Fucking Gamble

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill, but without regional pricing. In fact there is a special discount through PU.
-DVD quality videos
-18 video format download choices ranging from ipod to 1920x1080,12,000 k. As high quality as the best sites I have seen.
-Photosets for each video. Zipdownloadable at 1920x1080. Excellent and sharp.
Cons: -Some models have tattoos.
-Sometimes video camera focuses on the unimportant such as the guys face.
-Some shots are from too far away and should be closeups.
-The site is still too small with only 37 videos, but updates are weekly with an occasional extra bonus.
-The site at present has only Hungarian and American pornstars. Needs more variety.
Bottom Line: Others have written in great detail about the content and I do not want to repeat. However, I must say the level of creativity and quality is truly outstanding. Pretty much without exception, the site shows a lot of effort, as well as professionalism.

The customer service here is right up there with the best sites. As the site is relatively new, I encountered a few minor glitches. Everything was fixed quickly and courteously. I even got reward points as compensation.

You may well wonder what reward points are. If you accumulate 1000, you get a month for free. You get the points for participation in the forums, or by posting comments or suggestions. Sounds like a winner to me. The webmaster encourages interactivity with members.

One area of the site I found interesting is that you can download the game cards. They contain the actions that the players draw for either winning or losing. You can get the computer to create a simulated game or you can use the cards to play with your friends, your VERY open minded friends.

The simulated game that you can make the computer create is a bit static. The action is not shown, only the players losing clothing. A little too cartoonish for my taste. I think this should be improved.

Another area that needs improvement is that the files are just too big and the games too long. Some are well over 1GB, some approach 2GB just for a half hour segment. The entire video is usually over 2 hours and often approaches 3. I agree with a comment made by others-after I have seen the game even once, I would appreciate a condensed version. While it is great to see buildup to the eventual sex, you also get a lot of joking and kidding around. Sometimes you even see other nonsexual activities, such as drinking wine. I love these touches of reality, but not for 3 hours.

While I am on the subject, I feel the tease is its true strength. You know there will be all out sex at the end, but easily 80% is the prelude.

Both the female and male stars are eye candy. I don't ususally care much about the men, but here I think they are part of a goal of making the site fun for women as well as us guys. When the female players win, the action they get is all about their pleasure. Some videos include a lot of female pleasure, some focus on male pleasure. I can easily imagine couples enjoying watching as well as playing the games together.

The videos themselves feature couples, two guys for each girl, multiple couples and even lesbian scenes. The sex itself is everything from oral to anal to vaginal, even some with double penetration. Many scenes use toys also. There is a high level of fun. You get the feeling the players enjoy making the videos.

With such a high level of creativity and originality, I highly recommend this site.

06-03-10  07:25am

Replies (5)
Visit Old And Young Lesbians

Old And Young Lesbians

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Part of large network of 17 sites. 15 focus on mature women.
-No download limit.
-Most recent updates are WMV 1280x720, 4730kbps. Very sharp and appear to be DVD like in quality.
-Can download as clips or as whole videos. Streaming is also an option. With slow downloads and each scene going over 1GB, I used the clip option.
-At the moment there are 172 videos as well as the same number of photosets. Most recent photo updates are 1260x1890, over 400kb. Very clear and crisp.
-Natural looking women that appear to be amateurs.
Cons: -Mostly plain, some even unattractive women, both for the younger ones as well as the older.
-Cannot use download managers.
-The network is very expensive.
-Irregular updates. They seem to be about weekly though. For 2010 there are 17 so far.
Bottom Line: This is part of a network that specializes in mature women. I mean mature, like at least 50. Some are even in their 70s. These are not your standard MILFS in age or appearance and is definitely not for everyone. I expect younger PUers would feel they were watching their grandmothers.

Even the youngest of the older women here look worn and aged. It is obvious that they don't take care of themselves as well as those you would find on most sites that focus on older women. Not cute.

The younger women don't always look their reported ages either. Natural is the word here, not made up or attempting to look younger than their actual age.

As far as the sex, it often is done without any chemistry. In all fairness though, sometimes it may be surprisingly hot. I expect the older women to get excited about the prospect of sex with the younger ones. Sometimes the better scenes truly get going with the younger ones seeming to go with the spirit of things quite enthusiastically.

The sex is both soft, with a lot of touching and licking, as well as harder using a variety of toys. In the scenes that did not work for me, the younger women didn't go down on the older ones. They seem to get them off manually or with toys though.

The only site I have ever been a member of that had scenes that could be compared was momsteachingteens.com. Although that site has mostly scenes of older and younger women sharing a man, there are about two dozen lesbian scenes as well. There you get much more attractive women, both younger and older. The sex is also much hotter as well. Another difference is that those scenes seemed like slick standard gonzo nd these feel very unrehearsed and real. Nothing slick here.

Overall my impression is of a site that is a niche wtihin a niche. I thought some scenes were very hot, but mostly they were just ok. While I don't care for the glam porn look, it is just difficult to get into scenes featuring women that didn't age well.

04-27-10  08:48am

Replies (0)
Visit Old And Young Gangbang

Old And Young Gangbang

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Part of large network of 17 sites. Most focus on mature women, not mature men though.
-No download limit.
-Most recent updates are WMV 1280x720, 4730kbps. Very sharp and appear to be DVD like in quality.
-Can download as clips or as whole videos. Streaming is also an option. With slow downloads and each scene going over 1GB, I used the clip option.
-Photo sets for each video. Most recent updates are 1260x1890, over 400kb. Very clear and crisp.
-Attractive, natural looking young women. Not overly made up, just being themselves as nature made them. They couldn't be less glamour or gonzo.
Cons: -Very expensive. However, I felt it was a good value for the money when you look at the whole network, not just this one site.
-Slow downloads. I got not more than 500kbps.
-Most videos included scenes involving piss. For me a real turn off.
-Infrequent updates. The site opened in February of 2007 with 13 updates. In the rest of 2007 there were 7, in 2008 7, in 2009 only 5, and in 2010 so far only 2.
Bottom Line: This site focuses on the niche of gangbangs involving old men and much younger women. I have been a member of beautyandthesenior.com, grandpasfuckteens.com, as well as oldfartsyoungtarts.com. Scenes of gangbangs within this already specialized niche are very rare on those sites. I feel this is the best and most interesting site of old and young porn.

When comparing all these sites, the first thing I noticed is that all of them are from the same country, the Netherlands. The male talent is very often the same few. Somehow that is not really surprising as I would expect very few men of that age group are capable of making a porn video, let alone be from the same small country. They do the job adequately, which I believe is saying a lot. They are very enthusiastic in their scenes on all these sites that I mentioned, but on this one they appear to be enjoying themselves the most.

The women also seem to enjoy the scenes here more than on the other sites. The sex is definitely more extreme, with camera work that is excellent for the most part. In scenes going over a half hour, you see everything imaginable. You get peeing, which I don't care for, but you also get oral, anal and vaginal galore. They often have long sections of ass licking. If you like this, which I do, you will not be able to take your eyes from the screen. You may find yourself not being able to believe your eyes. That great looking girl is doing WHAT to WHO?

If you like this niche, I highly recommend you give it a try. If they would update more often and lower the price, it would be a 99 in my book.

04-22-10  07:17am

Replies (8)
Visit Old Farts Young Tarts

Old Farts Young Tarts

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Great fantasy content of older men(over50) with younger women. Mostly the women are about barely legal age.
-Very reasonably priced.
-Many attractive females.
-Zipdownloadable photo sets for every video
-All exclusive videos, not the same as on other sites in the network with the same theme.
Cons: -Very slow downloads.
-Most videos not downloadable as whole videos, just as clips.
-No choice as to video formats. You either get WMV or you get WMV.
-Not HD quality movies, just ok at 720x540 at best.
-Photos are 800x1200 with no download choices as to quality.
Bottom Line: This site is from the same people who make Beautyandthesenior.com. The sites are very similar, but the content is not identical. It is most definitely not a clone.

On the plus side, there is the same level of seemingly impossible fantasy here as you get on Beautyandthesenior.com. Old guys get to have gorgeous much younger women throw themselves at them. These girls are dying for these guys. I wish! It is so unlikely that you have to laugh and go along with the incredibly hot visuals. If these guys can get these women, any guy can. They are about as out of shape and unattractive as you can imagine and the contrast is truly a turn on. Compared to BATS, the content has a few plusses. One is that there are several scenes with a second woman, generally one about the same age as the man. While not attractive, I felt they added a nice touch by competing with the younger women or by pretending to be the man's wife and engaging in a three way. Another plus was having a few scenes featuring women who were not white. There were a few with black women as well as a few with Indians. It is so rare to find Indians in porn that to me it was a breath of fresh air. At the very least, it is unusual for porn and unexpected from a European site.

On the negative side the site has many of the same features as does beautyandthesenior. The site layout is identical, as are the difficulties with slow downloads, 300 to 400kbps, and the inability to get a link when you want one. Click on the scene and you get nothing most of the time. If you keep trying, eventually the link opens. Very tedious and time consuming. I found freedownloadmanager works, but not at an accelerated speed. Most of the videos are downloadable only as clips.

In spite of its negatives, the site is definitely to be recommended. It is one of the best in its niche and compares favorably with beautyandthe senior, which I feel has some of the best content to be found on any site, let alone a niche.

Recommended, but not perfect. An excellent value for the money.

04-08-10  10:43am

Replies (2)
Visit British Tease

British Tease

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -No download limits or DRM
-Full strip to nude content
Cons: -Maybe half of the photo sets are zipdownloadable
-Photos are available only as 800x1200. Nearly all are portrait as few are landscape.
-Videos are unwatchable at 352x288 and dull.
-The site has not updated since October 2008.
Bottom Line: The site is about British models stripping to nude. Nearly everything here is softcore stripping, but you will also find some scenes with toys, as well as b/g and g/g hardcore.

I liked that the sets showed women in various outfis that had a full strip sequence. There was a decent focus on teasing as well. The toys, b/g and g/g scenes were few but also interesting.

The photo sets had no download choices and were mostly of moderate not high quality at 800x1200.
These were enjoyable, but the models were only slightly better than average looking amateurs. On the site it says they are encouraged to get explicit, but they always have a choice as to how far they will go. As a result, many sets are nude, but without much to see between their legs. Most scenes are very tame, but nice strip sequences.

My biggest complaint is with the lack of updates. The site is moderately sized and can be downloaded in a couple of days. There is no reason to go for anything longer than a month. Too bad they did not have a full access trial, as that would have been a long enough term.

A good site for what it is, but there are plenty of bigger and better sites for only a few dollars more.

03-31-10  08:03am

Replies (2)
Visit Only All Sites

Only All Sites

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Nice discount through TBP.
-Huge network of sites with a similar theme.
-No download restrictions. A nice plus considering the sheer quantity that is available.
-Nice photosets with three choices of photo quality, including ultra large.
-Some HD quality videos, but not enough.
-Mostly very attractive models. However, about one third were not. Seem to be classy women that you might see or even know. I didn't see a single boob job.
-Very active member forum that takes requests from members.
Cons: -Glamour type photography. Often the women have too much makeup and seem very stiff. They don't often seem into what they are doing.
-Most videos are not at all erotic. Not much in the way of sensuous movements. Rubbing an arm or a leg is not teasing.
-Many videos and photo sets don't even get to topless.
Bottom Line: The site sells itself as 100% erotic, 100% tease and 100% exclusive. They also say they are about the erotic, not the extreme. In order to be erotic without being explicit, they need to appeal to the members ability to be mentally stimulated. Without explicit photos and videos, the models themselves have to be special in a way that other sites don't often attempt.

Since this is so unusual in pornland, comparisons are difficult, if not impossible. The question to be answered is, do they succeed? Is their goal of being erotic successful?

I was a member of onlytease.com in 2006. I was somewhat disappointed by the lack of heat I saw. However times change and so have my tastes in porn. Since I love nice legs and pantyhose, I felt that maybe I should give the network a try at the newly discounted price.

I found quite quickly that the network is a LOT larger than what I had subscribed to in 2006. The quality of both the videos and the photos has greatly improved. Navigation is easy, but the search function is still inadequate.

Did they reach their goal of being erotic? Yes and no. Yes some of what you see is truly great and I love it a lot. However, the site promises a lot more than it delivers. I thought the tease referred only to the content, but the site itself could be a lot better.

Regarding the outfits, the models all too often wear pants or use opaque pantyhose. I like dresses showcasing great legs that look like legs, in other words sheer pantyhose. I don't much care for cheerleaders or bunnies either.

Overall, problem number one is that nearly all the videos simply do nothing for me. In all fairness photo sites usually have poor videos. What I feel the problem here is that the models don't have much of a feel for teasing. For the most part, European models get into this type of photo and video modeling without first doing any stripping or other live shows. They may be quite beautiful, but don't master the art of sensuous movements. For example, I see a lot of scenes with hands rubbing arms or legs, but very little in the way of quick flashes. I rarely see a glimpse of panties that seems to be an accident or are intended to build up my interest. The strip sequences are usually quite dull and often end without being even topless. A lot of sizzle, but very little steak. There is an active thread in the forum about whether models who will not even do topless should be on the site.

In my opinion,the site is very much hit and miss. You would have to go through a lot of photo sets and videos to find the true gems. If you have the time and energy, you may fall in love with the site. As for me, I am happy to find a few truly enjoyable downloads, but the site is just too much work.

03-21-10  08:10am

Replies (8)
Visit Teasers VOD

Teasers VOD

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through Epoch.
-Nice quality videos. Not HD though.
-Very attractive models. However, many have tattoos and/or are victims of badly done boob jobs.
-No download limits.
Cons: -No photos.
-Too much masturbation and not enough teasing.
-Small archive and only three updates per month. Needs serious growth for the price to make sense.
-Cannot use Freedownloadmanager.
-Links break constantly. Without a download manager, you must continuously watch out for redownloading incomplete videos.
Bottom Line: This site bills itself as "porn valleys premier public nudity website", as well as the "winner of best paysite of 2009 at GramPonante.com." I wouldn't go that far in my praise of the site. It features public nudity, with a major focus on masturbation, using fingers not toys.

One of the first things I noticed is that the site is just too small to justify the price. At nearly $30, other sites at that price are considerably larger. With just three updates a month, it hardly is worth a second month's membership. Even worse some updates are boring behind the scenes videos.

What you do get are high quality videos featuring minor porn stars and a few amateurs. Across the board, they are attractive. However you also get tattoos and fake boobs on a large number of them.

The scenes are broken down into several sections that are downloaded only individually. You should be able to download every scene all at once for each model. The first section is an interview scene at an outdoor cafe. Ok if you want to hear the models talk, but any visuals are very brief. The models flash under the table or flash their boobs very quickly. You also get scenes of upskirt, bikini, secluded locations, and indoor masturbation scenes called bonus. The upskirt scenes are the only really hot scenes that feature exhibitionism. The others focus on masturbation. The bikini scenes are so weak that I don't know why they are even on the site. Many of the individual scenes are split into parts that cannot be downloaded all at once.

Although the video quality is much better here, I wish the scenes were more like those at publicflash.com. Those were real teasing, flashing and fun. These scenes give me the feeling of pros getting paid, with no excitement about doing the forbidden. You can easily see that they are in this just for the cash.

There are no photos on the site. However, there is a photographer in every scene clicking away. It can get most annoying as I want to see the model, not the back of the head of some guy. In some scenes they even direct the model on how to pose. I am truly baffled what happens to the photos they take.

The site is good if you like masturbation more than I do. Its really not that bad, just disappointing.

03-15-10  06:27am

Replies (0)
Visit Grandpas Fuck Teens

Grandpas Fuck Teens

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 03-03-10  10:36am  (Update History)
Reason: rethought score
Pros: -Nice size archive.
-Part of large network, 21st Sextury. Get 30 other sites with one membership.
-Very sharp quality videos. Available downloads are parts as well as whole videos.
-Sharp large photosets. Not very high resolution, but very good quality.
-Zipdownloadable photo sets.
-Mostly attractive models, but not consistent.
-Nice discount through TBP.
Cons: -Photo sets not custom zipdownloadable.
-No choices regarding resolution quality.
-I don't care for the network policy where we do not have any choices regarding which sites are included in the membership. You get what they decide.
-Basically the European version of gonzo. Very standard and predictable action and models, despite this being a niche site.
-Confusing search engine. If you click by model, you get hits on every site in the network, even those you are not subscribed to.
Bottom Line: I am so glad I was a member of Beautyandthe senior first. The contrast between the two is quite stark, despite the fact that they share some of the same male talent and are both representative of an unusual niche.

In many ways this site is superior. Some examples of why I say this are the better quality of the videos, faster download speeds, the option to download whole videos, as well as superior photo sets that are zipdownloadable.

In BATS the models are consistently better looking. Many here are overdone with stripper clothes, excessive makeup, tattoos, fake breasts and in general look like they all came from the same factory. Very predictable, very standard, but not very creative or fun.

More importantly, the differences between the two sites are the intangibles that are not easy to quantify. BATS is about fantasy; this site is very standard in ways that most sites are. BATS scenes are focused and short. In contrast these scenes are much longer, with the types of sex that are common on the internet. For example most scenes focus on a long vaginal section. Many scenes have anal as well as analingus. You may like this, and I do, but how is this different from most sites that are not in this niche? Here they use older men to do the same things that you see on other sites done by younger men. At BATS the feeling is that these older guys need all the oral stimulation possible. In this they seem to be hard for about a half hour of vigorous action focusing on penetration. Nice, but you see that on all kinds of sites that are not in the niche.

I greatly appreciate BATS use of highly creative fantasy and an uncommon approach to porn that includes a lot of kissing and foreplay. BATS has unlikely, dreamlike scenes and the scenes here feel like you have seen them before.

This site is interesting, but nowhere near as unique or as much fun as BATS.

03-03-10  09:10am

Replies (7)
Visit We Are Hairy

We Are Hairy

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Billing through CCBill without regional pricing.
-Hi Def videos
-Super high resolution photo sets
-Custom zips available as an option.
-Helpful and friendly webmaster. Excellent customer service.
-Forum and photoset comments by Capn and Messmer.
Great to see friends from PU.
-Two uploads a day, but mostly photos not videos.
-Download manager friendly.
-No download restrictions.
Cons: -Needs more attractive girls. They are natural but often leave something to be desired.
-Few models are not very thin. Not much variety in size, body shape, or age.
-The site has American models, but not yet a single one that is any race but white. Surely they can be found and photographed.
-The videos are nearly all masturbation. I prefer teasing,stripping, or just about anything but not hands on or inside their pussy,or toys.
Bottom Line: After reading reviews by some PUers that I really respect a lot, I decided to join a site dedicated to bush.

My first experience involved billing and entering. I got immediate helpful answers from the webmaster Basil. Nice first impression.

The site layout is simple and uncomplicated. There are enough options to make navigation easy. The search engine works just fine. There are no broken links and no other problems.

The first section I checked out was the videos. While the quality was great, I just don't care much for masturbation either manually or with toys. Not good. I kept nothing, as the content was not to my taste.

However, I had been expecting the photo sets to be the best part of the site, as it usually is with softcore sites.

Many of the models were of close to legal age. I wouldn't mind that, but with zero or almost no makeup, the acne that many have is just a turnoff. I like natural, but a touch of makeup is fine with me. Acne, no way, sorry. There were a few mature models, but so far very few. There were a few with at least C cups, but not many. Most were A's and B's. That can be attractive, but I also would prefer more with larger size breasts.

I hate tattoos and piercings. While only a few had either or both, I was turned off that any did. At least their bodies were otherwise all natural with no boob jobs.

Most, I felt about 75%, of the women on the site were very ordinary in their attractiveness. That can be ok, but the site definitely needs more of the better looking ones.

While the photos were of high resolution and I love the custom capability of the zipdownloads, I feel the site needs a lot more growth.

With two updates a day, I am sure the site will continue to improve. It definitely has potential. However, the site is not yet ready to get a score better than 80 from me.

02-21-10  09:10am

Replies (9)
Visit Cum Squad

Cum Squad

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Part of network of 17 sites, most with a similar theme of group sex.
-Bill through CCBill with no regional pricing
-No download restrictions.
Cons: -Very few attractive women. Of the 93 on the site I liked only 3.
-Cannot use Freedownloadmanager.
-Low quality videos. TBP lists them at 352x288, 1800 kbps. My computer does not give me stats, but the videos are very poor and in my opinion unwatchable. There are two options, both AVI only, whole video or in parts.
-No streaming of videos.
-Three of the updates had no links.
-Photo sets are screenshots. I get 600x896 and not zipdownloadable.
-The site has not updated since 2006.
Bottom Line: The idea behind the site is one of Czech women getting gangbanged with facial endings. Unfortunately the concept is far more interesting than the site.

Like its sister site, fullyclothedsex.com, there isn't much flesh to be seen here. I like CFNM somewhat, but don't care for sex with the panties pulled aside. I feel this is boring with no sense of plot as you often find in CFNM sites.

Another negative I felt about the site is the lack of attractive women. I liked so few, only 3 out of 93, that I see this as a major negative.

The biggest negative is the lack of updates. The site died in 2006. I feel that if the site is not maintained, the owners just don't care about it. If they don't why should I?

This site is just plain behind the times and not worth joining. I am being generous in my score only because it is part of a network.

02-17-10  06:40am

Replies (2)
Visit Drunk Sex Orgy

Drunk Sex Orgy

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill, but no regional pricing.
-Part of network of 17 sites. Most have a similar theme of group sex and some are about a few other fetishes.
-Download manager friendly.
-No download limits or restrictions.
-Three download choices. You can select small size AVI files of about 200MB, medium quality WMV files also about 200MB, or HD 1280x720 500kbps WMV files that are very sharp, but are about 600MB.
-Many attractive, very nicely dressed Czech women.
Cons: -Somewhat slow downloads, about 500 kbps.
-Long videos can be seen as a plus, but there are a lot of parts with wasted time, little or no action, or unerotic videography.
Bottom Line: This site features continuous sex orgy scenes scenes in clubs. You rarely see any actual drinking though. The participants hold glasses, fill them, and pour champaign onto each other. They don't appear to be drunk. The site says the participants are pornstars that mostly do this for the fun of it as they are paid very little. To me it seemed mechanical sex and not very spontaneous. The alcohol did not appear to be a help in loosening up the models.

What you do get is a lot of sex between men and women as well as lesbian sex. The sex is mostly oral and vaginal.

I found the orgy scenes to be a bit unfocused. The camera pans to a couple engaged in some sex act that you didn't see begin and rarely see end. Participants often switch partners, but usually offscreen. The feel is one of getting samples and can be compared to watching trailers. You see action, but you don't get the buildup in intensity that comes from focusing on one scene and just one scene. There is no feeling of progression from lust, to passion, to sex, to finishing. Since the scenes are rather long, most continue into another clip. It is not always easy to find which clips finish the scene that you are watching.

If you like this kind of action, this site is rather large with almost 300 videos in an archive that goes back to 2004.

A big size site, with a large photoset for each video, nice HD quality videos, but for me, it doesn't get an enthusiastic endorsement as to its eroticism.

02-14-10  08:06am

Replies (1)

Shown : 26-50 of 192 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.17 seconds.