Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : mbaya (356)  

Feedback:   All (1157)  |   Reviews (176)  |   Comments (129)  |   Replies (852)

Other:   Replies Received (685)  |   Trust Ratings (90)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 187 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
26
Visit Secretease

Secretease
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Inexpensive with two day, twelve day and monthly options.
-CCbill without regional pricing.
-High quality photos at 3000x2009.
-Photo sets are zipdownloadable. BUT, there is a daily limit of 16 photo sets.
-Long strip sets that end in explcit shots. Not really nude as the models usually still wear some clothing.
Cons: -No videos, only photo sets.
-Many sets end with less than explicit nudity.
-The site is still too small. With photo set updates every four days, eventually this site will get much bigger.
Bottom Line: Like many sites from the UK, this one focuses on clothing and teasing. The outfits are sexy, most models are sexy, but not outstanding.

One big negative is that the site is just too small to stay more than at most the 12 day trial. With updates every four days, it should become a bargain at this price in 2011.

Another negative is that there is a daily download limit on zipdownloading the sets. I got only three models as the limit is 16 sets. I found this when I reached the limit, as the site nowhere mentions this. I would appreciate knowing the rules before I sign up, not after. I did not find any limit on individual photos though. As the site grows, this will become increasingly tedious.

For me another negative is that there are too many fake blondes. Most of the models on the site are reasonably attractive, but there just aren't many knockouts out of the 25 models.

What I did like were the slow strip sets. The feeling is one of building up as you go along. With well done photography, I enjoyed the quality of the photos.

Overall not a bad site for the price.

11-07-10  09:40am

Replies (4)
Review
27
Visit Freak Bukkake

Freak Bukkake
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Billed through Epoch.
-No regional billing.
-Discounted price through TBP.
-Part of large network of 37 websites, admittedly some are tiny. In total they say there are 800 scenes, 15,000 minutes, 900,000MB and over 250 models in the network.
-Newer videos are on the low end of HD at 1280x720, and 3154kbps. Unfortunately there aren't enough of these.
-Photos are zipdownloadable.
-Attractive women, mostly in a very natural way. No fake boobs, but a few have some tattoos or hardware. A very unglam, non pornstar site.
-The women are from Spain.
-Fairly good videography. No weird angles and they seem to focus on the right visuals. No shots of the chair or the wall. No focus on the guys faces or other distractions that ruin many porn videos.
Cons: -Photos are low quality screenshots.
-Not download manager friendly. I could not use Freedownloadmanager or Internetdownloadmanager. IDM seems to be able to download nearly everything I try, but not on this site.
-Updates are irregular and too few. So far in 2010 there have been 4, in 2009 only 3, in 2008 11. Definitely needs growth.
Bottom Line: For this site I think that the TBP policy of not factoring in pricing is completely wrong. For only $14.95, you get a small site with a few very nice quality videos. Since you are paying nearly a dollar for each video, what exactly do you get?

Well, you get a decent size network. In that context, it doesn't seem overly expensive. The videos on this site are low end HD quality. Not the best I have seen, but up to today's standards.

The women are not jaded pornstars and never overact. They appear to be in the first or close to their first scenes and act accordingly. They seem excited or at least interested, not bored. In many cases they say that they are a bit nervous. Very real and very believable.

The guys often wear masks or bandannas to cover their faces. Since the camera almost never focuses above their waists, I feel this is not a negative. If anything, you get the feeling that these are just regular guyslike you or me who got lucky enough to be in the scene.


As far as the content, it compares favorably with Japanese bukkake scenes. The Japanese ones generally feel mechanical and rote. The women are only there to be unwilling sex objects to cum on. These videos do not have this feeling.

Another point is that both are in foreign languages. The Japanese don't use subtitles, so you miss a lot of whatever interaction and personality that a scene may have. In contrast, these videos are shot in Spanish, but have subtitles in English. Sometimes that can be distracting, sometimes the subtitles are a plus.

Further there is a lot of presex foreplay with multiple guys groping the women. Mostly rubbing, these guys seem to enjoy feeling them on their asses, breasts, etc., just like any guy would. In the Japanese videos there is also a lot of groping, but it feels as though the women don't want them to do it. It looks like they are being mauled by a gang, not participating in mutual foreplay.

American as well as Euro bukkake sites and DVDs seem to be about quantity of cum and having huge numbers of men in the scene. To me, scenes like this are more like a factory and less like fun. Very mechanical and uninspired, what you see is more or less an assembly line. On the other hand, these average about 10 or 12 guys, which is enough. Some of these scenes even have two women. In my book this site does it right.

These scenes are a bit extreme in that the women drink all the cum. Some do it straight from the cock and some do it from a bowl. Either way, no cum is wasted. There is never any feeling of the women being forced to do anything, or that they are degraded or humiliated. The dialog is respectful.

My only real complaint is that the site is too small. The rest of the network somewhat makes up for that.

10-24-10  08:22am

Replies (0)
Review
28
Visit Anal Nippon

Anal Nippon
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Nice discount through TBP.
-Part of a network of 17 Japanese sites. Easy navigation between network sites wihout reentering passwords.
-No download limits.
-Download manager friendly.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded with MP4, MPEG or as small files AVI for the best quality videos. Nice and sharp but not HD.
-Low quality screencaps can be downloaded as a zipfile.
-Plenty of hot women.
-Very large site. As of today has 580 videos.
-Updating about twice a week.
-NO MOSAICS, blurring,completely uncensored. Porn where you see everything.
Cons: -Incomphrehensible dialog. Everything is in Japanese without subtitles.
-Only listed in date order. The site is ok to navigate as long as you are not looking for a particular video or star.
Bottom Line: In spite of its name, the videos are not only about anal. There is every kind of sex here, both vaginal and oral. Many videos don't even have any anal at all. I found bukkake, blow jobs,gang bangs, many scenes with enemas,even lesbian scenes.

The best point about the site is that the videos are completely uncensored. I love Japanese creativity and now you get see it in all its glory.

Many scenes are just sex, some have a little plot. The sex is usually a guy or a group of guys practically raping a reluctant female who eventually gives in with some pressure or forcing. Not violent, it just presents women as not being into sex all that much and men as using women as sex objects. On the other hand, there is almost always stimulation for the woman by hand, dildo, or mouth before the guys get any. Not exactly Western porn, but the women are certainly cute.

I really liked the scenes that were a little different, as just sex can degenerate into gonzo style same old, same old rather quickly.

Definitely worth joining the network for even this one site. Reasonably priced, plenty to see, a decent update schedule, attractive women, NO CENSORSHIP.

09-09-10  10:21am

Replies (6)
Review
29
Visit Ass Teen Mouth

Ass Teen Mouth
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Part of network of 17 sites. The site mentions that you can access the 30 more sites of the jerkoffpass network, but that is not true.
-Bill through CCBill without regional pricing.
-No download limits
-Can use download managers
-Mostly very cute teenage models. As you may expect several are definitely first rate and others are too flat chested, plain faces etc. Common for teen sites.
-Although not mentioned on the site seems to be updating at about one per week. Presently 82 videos.
-Nice quality videos, the latest at 960x540, 3172kbps, but not HD. The photos are also nice but not great(1200x850).
-No talking at all. I think none of the talent here speaks any English.
Cons: -Very repetitive. Every scene is a clone of the same action, but with a different model.
-Only one male model. If you don't like him, you are not going to like the videos. I thought he was ok, not a plus or a minus.
-No way to search.
-Need a separate login each time you switch sites in the network.
-I wrote to customer service twice, no response. Once was about being unable to log in and the other was to ask how they can advertise access to sites I could not get into. See above.
Bottom Line: This site uses the same formula for its content in every video. First stripping, then sucking cock, then anal, then a facial finish. I like these, so it wasn't as bad as that sounds. If this is not for you, you already know if you would like the site.

By the way, the content is not what I would consider abusive. The models almost never seem to be bothered by the anal. True they don't love it, they just seem indifferent and merely going through the motions. Some have makeup that gets smeared, but I don't think that is even intentional. This is no way even remotely to be compared with a site such as facialabuse.com. I would hardly call the oral sex even forceful.

You also get a decent network of teen themed material. Several of the sites use the same ideas of oral and anal or just oral or just anal and the content looks like the same male model and the same females. No creativity.

The plus here is that the sex is with fairly attractive young models who seem to be into the sex enough for a porn site. No chemistry, no sizzle, nothing special. When you add in the other sites, you get a nice quantity of decent videos and pictures.

09-03-10  12:30pm

Replies (3)
Review
30
Visit Japanese Flashers

Japanese Flashers
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Nice discount through TBP.
-Part of a network of 17 Japanese sites. Easy navigation between network sites wihout reentering passwords.
-No download limits.
-Download manager friendly.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded with MP4, MPEG or as small files AVI. Nice quality but not HD.
-Low quality screencaps can be downloaded as a zipfile.
-The Japanese manage to get great looking women into their movies. Paying them well and giving them respect makes hot looking women willing to do movies that are truly hot.
Cons: -Non exclusive. I have seen some of this before.
-The site is still small despite updates a few times a week.
-Some videos are not nude. I am not refering to the mosaics, I mean they don't take off clothing.
Bottom Line: This site features videos from Japanese DVD's. Most feature nudity, but some do not. None of the videos are uncensored and without a mosaic.

That being said, some of the videos work quite well and many do not. The problem with flashing even in explicit sites is that all you get is nudity. The ones that work would be great models for non Japanese porn as they take everyday situations, such as school graduations and fill the screen with half naked women as an example. Sometimes they are only topless and then the scene switches to only bottomless. The videos do that with other scenes, such as offices and classrooms. There are many group scenes of gymnastics, track and field, etc as well. This can be hot, but some scenes where women walk down the street seem unreal and staged.

Like other Japanese porn the creativity can make up for the lack of uncensored videos. This site is hit and miss as well as a bit small. If you like Japanese flashing join deluxepass.com. Not only is there a lot more of it in its own site within deluxepass, but it also includes most of what is on this site.

08-30-10  10:06pm

Replies (8)
Review
31
Visit Nude Sport Videos

Nude Sport Videos
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -No regional billing even though it is through CCBill.
-Inexpensive three day full access trial. There is no need to spend more for a full month as you can get it all with a download manager. In my book this makes the site a bargain.
-Once a week updates in an archive of 241 videos, about a half hour each.
-Natural looking Russian amateurs. About as unglam as you can get. They are real, not overly made up plastic looking clones. However, the models are mostly very similar in body type and age and the content can get repetitive. Instead of porn star clones you get natural women who don't vary much either.
Cons: -Video quality could be a lot better. The stats show 1280x720, 4000 kbps for the best videos, but I suspect these are redone lower quality shoots.
-As you may expect with amateurs, many are very ordinary in their attractiveness. Like many non porn star websites, you have to search for the knockouts. There are some videos here that I really love.
-Sometimes slow downloads.
-Photos are not zipdownloadable.
-WMV is the only video option.
-No way to search. The videos are listed in date order. However, almost none of the models have more than one video.
-Turn the sound off as the background music is terrible.
Bottom Line: When I was twelve, the 19 year old next door used to dance and exercise nude. Sometimes she drew the shades and sometimes she did not. I think she secretly got off on me watching her. That makes nude exercise enough for me to love this site, although it is hardly perfect.

One thing I appreciate is that the models seem real. These are amateurs acting like amateurs. Sometimes they play up to the camera, and sometimes they just go through the motions. If they are showing me their bodies in an explicit way, I truly don't care if they are enjoying themselves. If a model shows me her pussy spread eagled, do I care if she is having a good time? It is all the same to me if they are an exhibitionist or just doing it for a paycheck.

In most of porn, I get the feeling that a scene I am watching is of people who fit the ideal of what porn producers think we like. Further they usually pretend they are having a good time and most of the time that involves bad acting. That seems so fake and artificial to me. It is obvious that on most porn sites the models are doing it for just a paycheck, but on this site you don't get bad acting in an obvious attempt to pretend otherwise.

A criticism I have of most softcore nude sites, think MetArt for example, is that the models are not erotic and just don't give that something extra that would work for me. Too much art, not enough erotic.With this site, you have movement that often teases in that you seldom know when you are going to get that great angle or that explicit shot. The teasing may not be intentional or played up, but you get it just the same. If you want to see a twenty year old on her back,opening and closing her legs, this is what you get. How about arching her back and pushing her pussy towards the camera after laying on the floor doing scissor kicks with her legs? Works for me.

If they only had better video quality I would give the site a higher score.

08-18-10  11:27am

Replies (11)
Review
32
Visit Pure CFNM

Pure CFNM
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Mostly great looking hot women in great outfits that show off their legs or have partially open blouses that show cleavage. Some shots are upskirt showing their panties, which also is sexy. There is no explicit nudity, but plenty of tease.
-Many blowjob scenes by groups of women.
-Weekly updates.
-The archive goes back to 2005 with 228 scenes.
-Photoset for every video.
-Somewhat active forum that encourages members to suggest scenes as well as other improvements.
Cons: -Regional pricing through CCBill.
-The most recent updates are at 856x480, 3130 kbps. Nice but not HD.
-Photos recently are at 800x534 and are not zipdownloadable.
-Too many scenes are only handjobs.
-Sometimes their English accents are incomprehensible.
-Needs a search engine. Some models are in multiple scenes and the listings are only in chronological order.
Bottom Line: I was last a member of this site two years ago and decided to go back. Besides growing with one new scene added per week, the focus seems to have changed somewhat as well. There used to be many scenes of male humiliation, such as laughing at his small cock, leaving him unsatisfied and laughing as the models walk away, etc. There are still some recent updates with those themes, but not many. Now there are many more scenes of blow jobs, especially by groups of up to four women. In my book that is a distinct improvement.

The scenes seem to be male fantasies for the most part. A man wolf whistles at four women passing by and then they all give him a blow job for example. I feel the fact that they are clothed adds to the fantasy quality. I know not everyone agrees that clothed can be hot. Let's face it, who doesn't like to see pussy, ass and breasts? However, clothed gorgeous women makes a scene seem like it could really happen and that the women are pleased to make men get off. After all, in most scenes what are they getting out of it? They genuinely seem to be having fun, but no physical pleasure. Not a single fake orgasm on the site and no fake moaning either.

In many cases I wish that I could have seen the women's bodies as well. Most are nude on other English websites, so this is possible.

I feel that the site is the best I have seen in the CFNM(clothed female naked male)niche. Compared to others, the content as well as the women are hotter, but there is definitely a need for better quality videos and photos. At a minimum, the photos should be zipdownloadable.

08-13-10  07:23am

Replies (2)
Review
33
Visit Exploited Black Teens

Exploited Black Teens
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Good size site with 372 videos.
-Cute teens. Some, maybe 25%, I recognize as pros, most I think did only this one video.
-Videos emphasize oral, but there is also some vaginal in nearly every scene. Cum on face is the norm.
Cons: -Regional billing through CCBill. However you can use Epoch and get the nonregional price.
-No Photos.
-No download choices. WMV only.
-No whole movie, just multiple short clips.
-Only POV. Sometimes makes for poor camera work as it appears the camerman is also the stunt cock.
Bottom Line: TBP states the site started in 2002. It certainly has the look and feel of a site from that time. It has not been maintained very well as many of the links on the site, such as favorites and upcoming scenes are not functional. Neither is the forum. Further, the site may not even be updating. It just doesn't say and the videos don't have dates. It has not updated in the three weeks I have been a member.

What you get here are POV videos of late teen to early twenties, very attractive black women. I was impressed by their looks as well as their performances. Definitely a nice plus. Some are pornstars and most I think are not. The stars look a lot younger than I have ever seen them in other videos, so I suspect that in many cases these were their first or nearly first videos.

However, the videos themselves have a lot of poorly done shooting as the cameraman is also the stunt cock. The result is that many scenes are just not as well done as they should be.

The 372 videos themselves are better quality than you might think when looking at the statistics. The most recent are WMV only 512x288, 1164 kbps. Although not HD, they really are quite watchable. On the downside, you get clips only, of about 2 minutes each. There is no option to download a whole movie and there are no photos. These areas need improvement.

Actually, the site needs a real overhaul of nearly everything to bring it up to 2010 standards. The attractiveness of the models and the sheer quantity of the videos makes for a site that is interesting enough, but not what it could be. The site bills itself as "The Undisputed Biggest Black Teen Site Ever". I believe this can very well be true. Considering how few sites feature black teens in interracial action, this is a site to check out if you find it appealing.

07-11-10  09:41am

Replies (0)
Review
34
Visit Pantyhose Lane

Pantyhose Lane
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Daily updates of the photo section only.
-Good size site with 145 models and 33 guest models. Each has multiple shoots, so my guess is about 600 to 700 photosets.
-Most recent photos are 1200x1800.
-Although primarily a photo site, there are 125 video shoots as well. The most recent update is WMV 864x480, 595 kbps. Very weak and poor quality.
-Nice mix of mostly European and American models with a lot of Asian Americans and Black ones as well. If you love Asian women you will feel that you have died and gone to heaven.
Cons: -No zipdownloads.
-No easy way to search. Listings for photosets are under the models' names, in the order from the most recent update going back. You can also search by model name and a tiny thumbnail. Videos are listed separately, also in update order or in a separate listng of just videos. Only clips, no whole videos.
-Not updating the videos. There is no date on the site for each video, but the most recent is copyright 2009.
Bottom Line: Usually after downloading from a site, I gradually lose interest in the content. I get the feeling of been there, done that and it is on to the next website.

That didn't happen here. I wrote a review almost exactly a year ago and was primarily interested in the videos at that time. I did not appreciate the quality of the photography or its degree of erotic value. Gradually over the last year I have come to appreciate more the photos I downloaded and saved.

While the videos are of poor quality, the photo sets are nicely done. There is plenty of tease, as you might expect from a site with pantyhose in its name. Many of the outfits are quite classy and the stripping sequences work for me. While softcore, they often, but not always, go to full explicit. Sometimes there is complete nudity, but mostly you see before and after pussy shots of stripping off pantyhose. Some sets do not feature explcitness and the model stays clothed.

The model selection is first rate. You will recognize some familiar faces, but by no means all. Many are simply gorgeous, with great legs that are showcased in pantyhose. Many have nice breasts as well. Overall, very much glam in style, but with much more nudity and explicitness than for example Only Tease. The quality of the Asian women makes this site stand out. While the Americans and Europeans are also first rate, the Asian women alone make this site worth trying.

As far as a comparison with other pantyhose focused sites, much better looking models, more teasing and more delivery of explicitness. I feel it is the best in this niche.

I found the site to be fun and worth a shot if you are into softcore. Definitely a good value for a reasonable price. If they would make the photos zipdownloadable and added a decent way to search, I would not hesitate to give this site a score in the 90's.

06-27-10  08:57am

Replies (4)
Review
35
Visit Fucking Gamble

Fucking Gamble
(0)

95.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill, but without regional pricing. In fact there is a special discount through PU.
-DVD quality videos
-18 video format download choices ranging from ipod to 1920x1080,12,000 k. As high quality as the best sites I have seen.
-Photosets for each video. Zipdownloadable at 1920x1080. Excellent and sharp.
Cons: -Some models have tattoos.
-Sometimes video camera focuses on the unimportant such as the guys face.
-Some shots are from too far away and should be closeups.
-The site is still too small with only 37 videos, but updates are weekly with an occasional extra bonus.
-The site at present has only Hungarian and American pornstars. Needs more variety.
Bottom Line: Others have written in great detail about the content and I do not want to repeat. However, I must say the level of creativity and quality is truly outstanding. Pretty much without exception, the site shows a lot of effort, as well as professionalism.

The customer service here is right up there with the best sites. As the site is relatively new, I encountered a few minor glitches. Everything was fixed quickly and courteously. I even got reward points as compensation.

You may well wonder what reward points are. If you accumulate 1000, you get a month for free. You get the points for participation in the forums, or by posting comments or suggestions. Sounds like a winner to me. The webmaster encourages interactivity with members.

One area of the site I found interesting is that you can download the game cards. They contain the actions that the players draw for either winning or losing. You can get the computer to create a simulated game or you can use the cards to play with your friends, your VERY open minded friends.

The simulated game that you can make the computer create is a bit static. The action is not shown, only the players losing clothing. A little too cartoonish for my taste. I think this should be improved.

Another area that needs improvement is that the files are just too big and the games too long. Some are well over 1GB, some approach 2GB just for a half hour segment. The entire video is usually over 2 hours and often approaches 3. I agree with a comment made by others-after I have seen the game even once, I would appreciate a condensed version. While it is great to see buildup to the eventual sex, you also get a lot of joking and kidding around. Sometimes you even see other nonsexual activities, such as drinking wine. I love these touches of reality, but not for 3 hours.

While I am on the subject, I feel the tease is its true strength. You know there will be all out sex at the end, but easily 80% is the prelude.

Both the female and male stars are eye candy. I don't ususally care much about the men, but here I think they are part of a goal of making the site fun for women as well as us guys. When the female players win, the action they get is all about their pleasure. Some videos include a lot of female pleasure, some focus on male pleasure. I can easily imagine couples enjoying watching as well as playing the games together.

The videos themselves feature couples, two guys for each girl, multiple couples and even lesbian scenes. The sex itself is everything from oral to anal to vaginal, even some with double penetration. Many scenes use toys also. There is a high level of fun. You get the feeling the players enjoy making the videos.

With such a high level of creativity and originality, I highly recommend this site.

06-03-10  07:25am

Replies (5)
Review
36
Visit Old And Young Lesbians

Old And Young Lesbians
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Part of large network of 17 sites. 15 focus on mature women.
-No download limit.
-Most recent updates are WMV 1280x720, 4730kbps. Very sharp and appear to be DVD like in quality.
-Can download as clips or as whole videos. Streaming is also an option. With slow downloads and each scene going over 1GB, I used the clip option.
-At the moment there are 172 videos as well as the same number of photosets. Most recent photo updates are 1260x1890, over 400kb. Very clear and crisp.
-Natural looking women that appear to be amateurs.
Cons: -Mostly plain, some even unattractive women, both for the younger ones as well as the older.
-Cannot use download managers.
-The network is very expensive.
-Irregular updates. They seem to be about weekly though. For 2010 there are 17 so far.
Bottom Line: This is part of a network that specializes in mature women. I mean mature, like at least 50. Some are even in their 70s. These are not your standard MILFS in age or appearance and is definitely not for everyone. I expect younger PUers would feel they were watching their grandmothers.

Even the youngest of the older women here look worn and aged. It is obvious that they don't take care of themselves as well as those you would find on most sites that focus on older women. Not cute.

The younger women don't always look their reported ages either. Natural is the word here, not made up or attempting to look younger than their actual age.

As far as the sex, it often is done without any chemistry. In all fairness though, sometimes it may be surprisingly hot. I expect the older women to get excited about the prospect of sex with the younger ones. Sometimes the better scenes truly get going with the younger ones seeming to go with the spirit of things quite enthusiastically.

The sex is both soft, with a lot of touching and licking, as well as harder using a variety of toys. In the scenes that did not work for me, the younger women didn't go down on the older ones. They seem to get them off manually or with toys though.

The only site I have ever been a member of that had scenes that could be compared was momsteachingteens.com. Although that site has mostly scenes of older and younger women sharing a man, there are about two dozen lesbian scenes as well. There you get much more attractive women, both younger and older. The sex is also much hotter as well. Another difference is that those scenes seemed like slick standard gonzo nd these feel very unrehearsed and real. Nothing slick here.

Overall my impression is of a site that is a niche wtihin a niche. I thought some scenes were very hot, but mostly they were just ok. While I don't care for the glam porn look, it is just difficult to get into scenes featuring women that didn't age well.

04-27-10  08:48am

Replies (0)
Review
37
Visit Old And Young Gangbang

Old And Young Gangbang
(0)

95.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Part of large network of 17 sites. Most focus on mature women, not mature men though.
-No download limit.
-Most recent updates are WMV 1280x720, 4730kbps. Very sharp and appear to be DVD like in quality.
-Can download as clips or as whole videos. Streaming is also an option. With slow downloads and each scene going over 1GB, I used the clip option.
-Photo sets for each video. Most recent updates are 1260x1890, over 400kb. Very clear and crisp.
-Attractive, natural looking young women. Not overly made up, just being themselves as nature made them. They couldn't be less glamour or gonzo.
Cons: -Very expensive. However, I felt it was a good value for the money when you look at the whole network, not just this one site.
-Slow downloads. I got not more than 500kbps.
-Most videos included scenes involving piss. For me a real turn off.
-Infrequent updates. The site opened in February of 2007 with 13 updates. In the rest of 2007 there were 7, in 2008 7, in 2009 only 5, and in 2010 so far only 2.
Bottom Line: This site focuses on the niche of gangbangs involving old men and much younger women. I have been a member of beautyandthesenior.com, grandpasfuckteens.com, as well as oldfartsyoungtarts.com. Scenes of gangbangs within this already specialized niche are very rare on those sites. I feel this is the best and most interesting site of old and young porn.

When comparing all these sites, the first thing I noticed is that all of them are from the same country, the Netherlands. The male talent is very often the same few. Somehow that is not really surprising as I would expect very few men of that age group are capable of making a porn video, let alone be from the same small country. They do the job adequately, which I believe is saying a lot. They are very enthusiastic in their scenes on all these sites that I mentioned, but on this one they appear to be enjoying themselves the most.

The women also seem to enjoy the scenes here more than on the other sites. The sex is definitely more extreme, with camera work that is excellent for the most part. In scenes going over a half hour, you see everything imaginable. You get peeing, which I don't care for, but you also get oral, anal and vaginal galore. They often have long sections of ass licking. If you like this, which I do, you will not be able to take your eyes from the screen. You may find yourself not being able to believe your eyes. That great looking girl is doing WHAT to WHO?

If you like this niche, I highly recommend you give it a try. If they would update more often and lower the price, it would be a 99 in my book.

04-22-10  07:17am

Replies (8)
Review
38
Visit Old Farts Young Tarts

Old Farts Young Tarts
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Great fantasy content of older men(over50) with younger women. Mostly the women are about barely legal age.
-Very reasonably priced.
-Many attractive females.
-Zipdownloadable photo sets for every video
-All exclusive videos, not the same as on other sites in the network with the same theme.
Cons: -Very slow downloads.
-Most videos not downloadable as whole videos, just as clips.
-No choice as to video formats. You either get WMV or you get WMV.
-Not HD quality movies, just ok at 720x540 at best.
-Photos are 800x1200 with no download choices as to quality.
Bottom Line: This site is from the same people who make Beautyandthesenior.com. The sites are very similar, but the content is not identical. It is most definitely not a clone.

On the plus side, there is the same level of seemingly impossible fantasy here as you get on Beautyandthesenior.com. Old guys get to have gorgeous much younger women throw themselves at them. These girls are dying for these guys. I wish! It is so unlikely that you have to laugh and go along with the incredibly hot visuals. If these guys can get these women, any guy can. They are about as out of shape and unattractive as you can imagine and the contrast is truly a turn on. Compared to BATS, the content has a few plusses. One is that there are several scenes with a second woman, generally one about the same age as the man. While not attractive, I felt they added a nice touch by competing with the younger women or by pretending to be the man's wife and engaging in a three way. Another plus was having a few scenes featuring women who were not white. There were a few with black women as well as a few with Indians. It is so rare to find Indians in porn that to me it was a breath of fresh air. At the very least, it is unusual for porn and unexpected from a European site.

On the negative side the site has many of the same features as does beautyandthesenior. The site layout is identical, as are the difficulties with slow downloads, 300 to 400kbps, and the inability to get a link when you want one. Click on the scene and you get nothing most of the time. If you keep trying, eventually the link opens. Very tedious and time consuming. I found freedownloadmanager works, but not at an accelerated speed. Most of the videos are downloadable only as clips.

In spite of its negatives, the site is definitely to be recommended. It is one of the best in its niche and compares favorably with beautyandthe senior, which I feel has some of the best content to be found on any site, let alone a niche.

Recommended, but not perfect. An excellent value for the money.

04-08-10  10:43am

Replies (2)
Review
39
Visit British Tease

British Tease
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -No download limits or DRM
-Inexpensive
-Full strip to nude content
Cons: -Maybe half of the photo sets are zipdownloadable
-Photos are available only as 800x1200. Nearly all are portrait as few are landscape.
-Videos are unwatchable at 352x288 and dull.
-The site has not updated since October 2008.
Bottom Line: The site is about British models stripping to nude. Nearly everything here is softcore stripping, but you will also find some scenes with toys, as well as b/g and g/g hardcore.

I liked that the sets showed women in various outfis that had a full strip sequence. There was a decent focus on teasing as well. The toys, b/g and g/g scenes were few but also interesting.

The photo sets had no download choices and were mostly of moderate not high quality at 800x1200.
These were enjoyable, but the models were only slightly better than average looking amateurs. On the site it says they are encouraged to get explicit, but they always have a choice as to how far they will go. As a result, many sets are nude, but without much to see between their legs. Most scenes are very tame, but nice strip sequences.

My biggest complaint is with the lack of updates. The site is moderately sized and can be downloaded in a couple of days. There is no reason to go for anything longer than a month. Too bad they did not have a full access trial, as that would have been a long enough term.

A good site for what it is, but there are plenty of bigger and better sites for only a few dollars more.

03-31-10  08:03am

Replies (2)
Review
40
Visit Only All Sites

Only All Sites
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Nice discount through TBP.
-Huge network of sites with a similar theme.
-No download restrictions. A nice plus considering the sheer quantity that is available.
-Nice photosets with three choices of photo quality, including ultra large.
-Some HD quality videos, but not enough.
-Mostly very attractive models. However, about one third were not. Seem to be classy women that you might see or even know. I didn't see a single boob job.
-Very active member forum that takes requests from members.
Cons: -Glamour type photography. Often the women have too much makeup and seem very stiff. They don't often seem into what they are doing.
-Most videos are not at all erotic. Not much in the way of sensuous movements. Rubbing an arm or a leg is not teasing.
-Many videos and photo sets don't even get to topless.
Bottom Line: The site sells itself as 100% erotic, 100% tease and 100% exclusive. They also say they are about the erotic, not the extreme. In order to be erotic without being explicit, they need to appeal to the members ability to be mentally stimulated. Without explicit photos and videos, the models themselves have to be special in a way that other sites don't often attempt.

Since this is so unusual in pornland, comparisons are difficult, if not impossible. The question to be answered is, do they succeed? Is their goal of being erotic successful?

I was a member of onlytease.com in 2006. I was somewhat disappointed by the lack of heat I saw. However times change and so have my tastes in porn. Since I love nice legs and pantyhose, I felt that maybe I should give the network a try at the newly discounted price.

I found quite quickly that the network is a LOT larger than what I had subscribed to in 2006. The quality of both the videos and the photos has greatly improved. Navigation is easy, but the search function is still inadequate.

Did they reach their goal of being erotic? Yes and no. Yes some of what you see is truly great and I love it a lot. However, the site promises a lot more than it delivers. I thought the tease referred only to the content, but the site itself could be a lot better.

Regarding the outfits, the models all too often wear pants or use opaque pantyhose. I like dresses showcasing great legs that look like legs, in other words sheer pantyhose. I don't much care for cheerleaders or bunnies either.

Overall, problem number one is that nearly all the videos simply do nothing for me. In all fairness photo sites usually have poor videos. What I feel the problem here is that the models don't have much of a feel for teasing. For the most part, European models get into this type of photo and video modeling without first doing any stripping or other live shows. They may be quite beautiful, but don't master the art of sensuous movements. For example, I see a lot of scenes with hands rubbing arms or legs, but very little in the way of quick flashes. I rarely see a glimpse of panties that seems to be an accident or are intended to build up my interest. The strip sequences are usually quite dull and often end without being even topless. A lot of sizzle, but very little steak. There is an active thread in the forum about whether models who will not even do topless should be on the site.

In my opinion,the site is very much hit and miss. You would have to go through a lot of photo sets and videos to find the true gems. If you have the time and energy, you may fall in love with the site. As for me, I am happy to find a few truly enjoyable downloads, but the site is just too much work.

03-21-10  08:10am

Replies (8)
Review
41
Visit Teasers VOD

Teasers VOD
(1)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through Epoch.
-Nice quality videos. Not HD though.
-Very attractive models. However, many have tattoos and/or are victims of badly done boob jobs.
-No download limits.
Cons: -No photos.
-Too much masturbation and not enough teasing.
-Small archive and only three updates per month. Needs serious growth for the price to make sense.
-Cannot use Freedownloadmanager.
-Links break constantly. Without a download manager, you must continuously watch out for redownloading incomplete videos.
Bottom Line: This site bills itself as "porn valleys premier public nudity website", as well as the "winner of best paysite of 2009 at GramPonante.com." I wouldn't go that far in my praise of the site. It features public nudity, with a major focus on masturbation, using fingers not toys.

One of the first things I noticed is that the site is just too small to justify the price. At nearly $30, other sites at that price are considerably larger. With just three updates a month, it hardly is worth a second month's membership. Even worse some updates are boring behind the scenes videos.

What you do get are high quality videos featuring minor porn stars and a few amateurs. Across the board, they are attractive. However you also get tattoos and fake boobs on a large number of them.

The scenes are broken down into several sections that are downloaded only individually. You should be able to download every scene all at once for each model. The first section is an interview scene at an outdoor cafe. Ok if you want to hear the models talk, but any visuals are very brief. The models flash under the table or flash their boobs very quickly. You also get scenes of upskirt, bikini, secluded locations, and indoor masturbation scenes called bonus. The upskirt scenes are the only really hot scenes that feature exhibitionism. The others focus on masturbation. The bikini scenes are so weak that I don't know why they are even on the site. Many of the individual scenes are split into parts that cannot be downloaded all at once.

Although the video quality is much better here, I wish the scenes were more like those at publicflash.com. Those were real teasing, flashing and fun. These scenes give me the feeling of pros getting paid, with no excitement about doing the forbidden. You can easily see that they are in this just for the cash.

There are no photos on the site. However, there is a photographer in every scene clicking away. It can get most annoying as I want to see the model, not the back of the head of some guy. In some scenes they even direct the model on how to pose. I am truly baffled what happens to the photos they take.

The site is good if you like masturbation more than I do. Its really not that bad, just disappointing.

03-15-10  06:27am

Replies (0)
Review
42
Visit Grandpas Fuck Teens

Grandpas Fuck Teens
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 03-03-10  10:36am  (Update History)
Reason: rethought score
Pros: -Nice size archive.
-Part of large network, 21st Sextury. Get 30 other sites with one membership.
-Very sharp quality videos. Available downloads are parts as well as whole videos.
-Sharp large photosets. Not very high resolution, but very good quality.
-Zipdownloadable photo sets.
-Mostly attractive models, but not consistent.
-Nice discount through TBP.
Cons: -Photo sets not custom zipdownloadable.
-No choices regarding resolution quality.
-I don't care for the network policy where we do not have any choices regarding which sites are included in the membership. You get what they decide.
-Basically the European version of gonzo. Very standard and predictable action and models, despite this being a niche site.
-Confusing search engine. If you click by model, you get hits on every site in the network, even those you are not subscribed to.
Bottom Line: I am so glad I was a member of Beautyandthe senior first. The contrast between the two is quite stark, despite the fact that they share some of the same male talent and are both representative of an unusual niche.

In many ways this site is superior. Some examples of why I say this are the better quality of the videos, faster download speeds, the option to download whole videos, as well as superior photo sets that are zipdownloadable.

In BATS the models are consistently better looking. Many here are overdone with stripper clothes, excessive makeup, tattoos, fake breasts and in general look like they all came from the same factory. Very predictable, very standard, but not very creative or fun.

More importantly, the differences between the two sites are the intangibles that are not easy to quantify. BATS is about fantasy; this site is very standard in ways that most sites are. BATS scenes are focused and short. In contrast these scenes are much longer, with the types of sex that are common on the internet. For example most scenes focus on a long vaginal section. Many scenes have anal as well as analingus. You may like this, and I do, but how is this different from most sites that are not in this niche? Here they use older men to do the same things that you see on other sites done by younger men. At BATS the feeling is that these older guys need all the oral stimulation possible. In this they seem to be hard for about a half hour of vigorous action focusing on penetration. Nice, but you see that on all kinds of sites that are not in the niche.

I greatly appreciate BATS use of highly creative fantasy and an uncommon approach to porn that includes a lot of kissing and foreplay. BATS has unlikely, dreamlike scenes and the scenes here feel like you have seen them before.

This site is interesting, but nowhere near as unique or as much fun as BATS.

03-03-10  09:10am

Replies (7)
Review
43
Visit We Are Hairy

We Are Hairy
(1)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Billing through CCBill without regional pricing.
-Hi Def videos
-Super high resolution photo sets
-Custom zips available as an option.
-Helpful and friendly webmaster. Excellent customer service.
-Forum and photoset comments by Capn and Messmer.
Great to see friends from PU.
-Two uploads a day, but mostly photos not videos.
-Download manager friendly.
-No download restrictions.
Cons: -Needs more attractive girls. They are natural but often leave something to be desired.
-Few models are not very thin. Not much variety in size, body shape, or age.
-The site has American models, but not yet a single one that is any race but white. Surely they can be found and photographed.
-The videos are nearly all masturbation. I prefer teasing,stripping, or just about anything but not hands on or inside their pussy,or toys.
Bottom Line: After reading reviews by some PUers that I really respect a lot, I decided to join a site dedicated to bush.

My first experience involved billing and entering. I got immediate helpful answers from the webmaster Basil. Nice first impression.

The site layout is simple and uncomplicated. There are enough options to make navigation easy. The search engine works just fine. There are no broken links and no other problems.

The first section I checked out was the videos. While the quality was great, I just don't care much for masturbation either manually or with toys. Not good. I kept nothing, as the content was not to my taste.

However, I had been expecting the photo sets to be the best part of the site, as it usually is with softcore sites.

Many of the models were of close to legal age. I wouldn't mind that, but with zero or almost no makeup, the acne that many have is just a turnoff. I like natural, but a touch of makeup is fine with me. Acne, no way, sorry. There were a few mature models, but so far very few. There were a few with at least C cups, but not many. Most were A's and B's. That can be attractive, but I also would prefer more with larger size breasts.

I hate tattoos and piercings. While only a few had either or both, I was turned off that any did. At least their bodies were otherwise all natural with no boob jobs.

Most, I felt about 75%, of the women on the site were very ordinary in their attractiveness. That can be ok, but the site definitely needs more of the better looking ones.

While the photos were of high resolution and I love the custom capability of the zipdownloads, I feel the site needs a lot more growth.

With two updates a day, I am sure the site will continue to improve. It definitely has potential. However, the site is not yet ready to get a score better than 80 from me.

02-21-10  09:10am

Replies (9)
Review
44
Visit Cum Squad

Cum Squad
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Part of network of 17 sites, most with a similar theme of group sex.
-Bill through CCBill with no regional pricing
-No download restrictions.
Cons: -Very few attractive women. Of the 93 on the site I liked only 3.
-Cannot use Freedownloadmanager.
-Low quality videos. TBP lists them at 352x288, 1800 kbps. My computer does not give me stats, but the videos are very poor and in my opinion unwatchable. There are two options, both AVI only, whole video or in parts.
-No streaming of videos.
-Three of the updates had no links.
-Photo sets are screenshots. I get 600x896 and not zipdownloadable.
-The site has not updated since 2006.
Bottom Line: The idea behind the site is one of Czech women getting gangbanged with facial endings. Unfortunately the concept is far more interesting than the site.

Like its sister site, fullyclothedsex.com, there isn't much flesh to be seen here. I like CFNM somewhat, but don't care for sex with the panties pulled aside. I feel this is boring with no sense of plot as you often find in CFNM sites.

Another negative I felt about the site is the lack of attractive women. I liked so few, only 3 out of 93, that I see this as a major negative.

The biggest negative is the lack of updates. The site died in 2006. I feel that if the site is not maintained, the owners just don't care about it. If they don't why should I?

This site is just plain behind the times and not worth joining. I am being generous in my score only because it is part of a network.

02-17-10  06:40am

Replies (2)
Review
45
Visit Drunk Sex Orgy

Drunk Sex Orgy
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill, but no regional pricing.
-Part of network of 17 sites. Most have a similar theme of group sex and some are about a few other fetishes.
-Download manager friendly.
-No download limits or restrictions.
-Three download choices. You can select small size AVI files of about 200MB, medium quality WMV files also about 200MB, or HD 1280x720 500kbps WMV files that are very sharp, but are about 600MB.
-Many attractive, very nicely dressed Czech women.
Cons: -Somewhat slow downloads, about 500 kbps.
-Long videos can be seen as a plus, but there are a lot of parts with wasted time, little or no action, or unerotic videography.
Bottom Line: This site features continuous sex orgy scenes scenes in clubs. You rarely see any actual drinking though. The participants hold glasses, fill them, and pour champaign onto each other. They don't appear to be drunk. The site says the participants are pornstars that mostly do this for the fun of it as they are paid very little. To me it seemed mechanical sex and not very spontaneous. The alcohol did not appear to be a help in loosening up the models.

What you do get is a lot of sex between men and women as well as lesbian sex. The sex is mostly oral and vaginal.

I found the orgy scenes to be a bit unfocused. The camera pans to a couple engaged in some sex act that you didn't see begin and rarely see end. Participants often switch partners, but usually offscreen. The feel is one of getting samples and can be compared to watching trailers. You see action, but you don't get the buildup in intensity that comes from focusing on one scene and just one scene. There is no feeling of progression from lust, to passion, to sex, to finishing. Since the scenes are rather long, most continue into another clip. It is not always easy to find which clips finish the scene that you are watching.

If you like this kind of action, this site is rather large with almost 300 videos in an archive that goes back to 2004.

A big size site, with a large photoset for each video, nice HD quality videos, but for me, it doesn't get an enthusiastic endorsement as to its eroticism.

02-14-10  08:06am

Replies (1)
Review
46
Visit We Do Blow Jobs

We Do Blow Jobs
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Full access trial for three days is only $1
-136 videos is a decent amount. However see below.
-Download manager friendly.
-No DRM, download limits or broken links.
Cons: -A lot of the videos do not include a cum shot.
-A lot of the videos are of low quality, such as 320x240 or mp1.
-No ethnic, age or size diversity. Only white women under 25, about the same slim size.
-Some of the videos are duplicates. There are a lot less than the 136 that the site cliams and TBP lists.
Bottom Line: The attraction here is the full access trial at the unbelievable price at a mere one dollar for three days. Any cheaper would mean the site was free.

What you get are videos that are ripped from DVDs as well as some that were shot for other sites. In some scenes the women wear tshirts that say what site the material was on originally. The ones from DVD's are scenes cut out from longer scenes that originally had a lot more than a bj. This is the reason why a scene may not have a cum shot.

I found the lack of a finish somewhat of a drawback. I saw several scenes with an attractive model doing a nice bj, but then the scene abruptly ends. Very unprofessional.

Considering how many of the scenes were of low quality, duplicates or didn't have a cumshot, I ended up with about 25 scenes.

For a mere dollar, 25 scenes is a very good deal. I recommend patience with downloading so much and then sorting out the better scenes. At least the site is download manager friendly. The good scenes were well worth the insignificant cost of admission. This is even cheaper than the cheapest lunch. When you order from the dollar menu, you still have to pay tax. Then, you also need something to drink.

At the regular monthly price, the site is overpriced.

01-20-10  09:14am

Replies (3)
Review
47
Visit Glory Hole Initiations

Glory Hole Initiations
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Part of network of 17 sites that have the same theme of interracial content, Black and White. No Asians or other races though.
-Nice quality videos. Not HD, but sharp at 640x360, 1563 kbps.
-Great photo sets for each video. Not low quality screenshots, these come in at about 200 photos, 1600X1067. Zipdownloadable.
-Download manager friendly.
-No download limits.
-Mostly great looking Black models, although a few are rather plain.
-All unique original content shot for the site.
-Updates are weekly.
Cons: -The scenes are very repetitive. A model walks into the same bathroom in every scene. She strips, masturbates using her fingers, sucks on the guy, fucks him through the wall and then he comes on her face or in her mouth.
Bottom Line: This site is about Black women sucking off anonymous white cocks in a bathroom. The cocks stick through a hole in the wall, called a glory hole. They use the same gas station bathroom in every scene.

While the scenes are repetitive, they are also in an unusual niche for porn. There are several websites that use glory holes, TBP lists 17, but this is only the second that I know of that has a large number of Black women in interracial action. The other is gloryholegirlz.com. The video quality on that site is much more grainy and weaker than on this one. A criticism I had of that site is that often the scenes are mostly shot in a way that you can't really see the cum shot. Hoewever, the plus on that site is that the models suck off cock after cock, usually about 5 to 10 guys, sometimes even more.

In contrast, on this site you get only one guy in a short scene. Besides better video quality, you also get the models stripping, showing off their bodies and usually they also have vaginal and sometimes even anal sex. The models look more professional here as gloryholegirlz has mostly, if not all, amateurs.

On the members page I counted 226 videos, not the 338 listed on TBP. Of those 51 are of White girls and guys from when the site first opened. You get 175 videos of Black models and White guys, a very nice number for an unusual niche.

Overall a nice niche site, with a fairly uncommon theme. It is a nice addition to a network that features interracial porn.

01-11-10  11:35am

Replies (0)
Review
48
Visit Cum Bang

Cum Bang
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Part of network of 17 sites that have the same theme of interracial content, Black and White. No Asians or other races though.
-Nice quality videos. Not HD, but sharp at 640x360, 1563 kbps.
-Great photo sets for each video. Not low quality screenshots, these come in at about 200 photos, 1600X1067. Zipdownloadable.
-Download manager friendly, despite TBP saying DMs not allowed.
-Great looking Black models. Very attractive A list porn stars.
-All unique original content shot for the site.
Cons: -Unbelievable and overly repeated storyline. Every video has the model getting revenge on her Black boyfriend for cheating on her with a White girl.
-Storyline at the beginning of each video is just too long. At five to ten minutes, I lost patience.
-Recycle content. The site has the same amount of content as when I last reviewed it in November of 2008. One of my favorite scenes now has the update posted date as July 2009. Nice try as I downloaded it in November 2008.
Bottom Line: This site is definitely not for everyone. But for those who like the content it is a rare gem.

I have read many forum posts where PUers have complained about facials and guys jerking off onto a model's face. This site centers on that. It is bukkake and blowbangs of White guys onto and into Black girls faces and mouths.

As such it does an excellent job. The models are great looking and seem very interested in the action. I know it is just acting, after all these are pornstars. However this site has no real competition, that I know of, in the specific niche of Black girls and blowbangs.

I truly enjoyed the action, but would have loved a bigger site. The introductory page shows over 40 videos, but some are of scenes not posted yet. Further, many scenes that you do get are recycled. As I mentioned in one of my cons above, one of my favorite scenes I was able to download in November 2008, but is listed as a July 2009 update. I took points off for that.

I also would have given a higher score for HD quality video. The video and photo quality is just fine, but not the HD that the site advertises.

Another con that may be unfair is that I could not fast forward the downloaded video. I then tried to use DIVX Author to edit out the video intros, but then had no video, only the sound. These may both be my problems, and not the site. I just don't know. However, I have never encountered this on any other site.

Overall a fun site with unusual content that I rather enjoyed despite its drawbacks. Recommended for those who find this topic interesting.

01-08-10  11:45am

Replies (0)
Review
49
Visit Beauty And The Senior

Beauty And The Senior
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Inexpensive clone of Oldje. The price is half.
-Pretty good size archive. There are 160 videos and a photo set of screenshots for each.
-Extremely creative. Some of the most interesting fantasies I have ever seen. Imagine you have a submissive maid who does whatever you want or you are walking in the park and a gorgeous girl notices you and basically rapes you.
-Great editing. I am sure guys this age take a lot longer to cum than in these videos. Barely a wasted moment made it to the final cut.
-The heat may be a testimonial to viagra, but I think the natural beauty of the women was equally important. There are consistently great looking women. Hardly a plain one on the entire site. Some are so attractive that they have to be seen to be believed.
-No download limits, DRM or dead links. Everything works-even these old guys!
Cons: -Photo sets are not zipdownloadable.
-Photo sets often do not show much of the action of the video. Small sets of about 24 photos each.
-Videos come split into 2 or 3 parts. This is too small as the videos run to only 10 to 15 minutes.
-No HD or other options for downloading. The best videos are 740x540, 2156kbps. Nice but not what I hope for.
-Has very few connections for downloading. You have to wait for connections to open. It makes for very tedious downloads. I can get 2.5MB on Verizon Fios. Here I get at best about 500kbps.
-The guys are often repulsively ugly. However, I like the contrast with the gorgeous females. The fantasy here is that this could be you. If these guys could get these girls to do these things, so could you. I wish!
Bottom Line: Thanks to PU, I saw that Oldje.com has a clone site. This is it, but with an interesting twist-the price is half. Since I was never a member of Oldje, I cannot know if it may have better quality or more videos. However, there is plenty to see here with 160 videos and photosets. The quality is fine at 740x540, 2156kbps, but I would love to see these videos in HD.

What you get here are great looking models with guys that are really old. They advertise them as starting in their fifties, but most look a lot older. While the guys may look old, the girls are not. Mostly in their early twenties, I cannot believe they agreed to do this stuff with these guys.

Like other sites, there is a lot of nude eye candy, a lot, and I mean a lot of oral. I have not seen one scene that was not mostly blow jobs with oral cum shots inside the girl's mouth. The guys don't jerk into their mouth, the girls suck them off until they cum and they then show it to the camera. These guys I am sure need a lot of oral stimulation from these girls and they do provide it in spades. There is only a small amount of vaginal in each scene, but they all have some. I didn't see any anal though. However, there is some cunt licking as well as ass licking by the guys. Some of the scenes have the girls licking the guy's ass as well.

The fantasies are great. They have so many scenarios, ranging from scenes where the guy is dreaming, one where the guy died and a female angel wants his cock, to others where he just is talking to a girl and she just starts to undress him. There are many scenes where the woman is the instigator. Very hot, considering I would never expect this in real life.

As a guy not yet as old as most of the male performers, it was a truly unique experience to be a member here. I would highly recommend the site to anyone who may find this type of content interesting. I would have gone even higher on my score if they had HD and better downloading.

12-23-09  07:22am

Replies (7)
Review
50
Visit J Sex Network

J Sex Network
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Very large website. While I don't really know how many videos or photos there are, it certainly is a lot. One of the largest individual sites I have ever seen.
-Amazingly beautiful models. Hardly a single model is ordinary. Little or no fake boobs or tattoos. I didn't see even a single one.
-Most models have some bush.
-Description as well as screenshots of every video.
Cons: -Confusing navigation with no real search engine.
-Very few non hardcore photo sets or videos.
-Very little variety in the models. They are mostly the same age, from 18 to 25. Similarly waif like in body type, from basically flat chested to maybe B cups.
-Download entire DVD's. Since the files are mostly 1GB and over, they should be split into individual scenes.
-I saw no HD videos. Nice 640x480 at its best, but some are also of lesser quality. A few videos are unwatchable and split into tiny parts.
-Constant warnings about download limits as well as messages telling you not to use download managers, bots or file splitters. Warnings that if you try to download more than one video at a time you will be "restricted". Comes across as "Big Brother is watching you" as you download.
-Not cheap. No extras or other sites included.
Bottom Line: The site is very large and represents a large sample of Japanese hardcore. However there are whole genres of porn that Jsexnetwork is ignoring.

A while back I joined Deluxepass.com. They have a tremendous quantity of Japanese videos spread over 56 websites within the group. There were exhibitionst videos, sharking videos of girls having their panties pulled down or aside in public, upskirts, videos of sleeping girls having their clothing cut off, as well as an interesting variety of other non hardcore scenes.

I feel that there is a lot more that Jsexnetwork can add to its archive. Jsexnetwork has very little except hardcore. Some is creative and some is basically the Japanese version of gonzo.

I don't want to complain about the content that they do have though. It comes as two types.

One is uncensored hardcore. There is not much in the way of creativity going on here. Almost without exception it is the Japanese version of gonzo. Several sex scenes are included in each video. Some are better than others, but in most the girl is attractive in a cute type of way and squeals as they are groped or have sex. They mostly act as if they are not really enjoying themselves. I found these videos to be ok, some even great. However, with several scenes in each whole video download, you have to either fast forward a lot or trim the videos. Twenty minutes of a girl trying to jack off a guy with a 2 inch dick that never gets hard can get tiresome.

The censored videos are more interesting, generally having a bit of plot. However, some are not worth bothering with either. My biggest complaint is that 2 hours worth of video with many parts that are not hardcore may make a better porno, but you need to fast forward a lot or trim the scenes. If the first 10 to 20 minutes are just talking, do I really need to use up my daily download limit?

My advice to the site is to make the videos downloadable in parts. Downloading entire DVDs is a royal pain both to download and then to deal with once you have them. With the download restrictions I mentioned in the cons, it is not a benefit to us or the site for files to be so big.

My other advice is to have a search engine that tells me something about the videos. I like bj videos-good luck here. You have to read the individual descriptions of the videos to figure that out for yourself. With literally hundreds of videos, my reaction is one of asking if they are kidding. I also found that many bj scenes are embedded in the middle or the end of the videos. Do I need to spend hours trimming them?

Overall, nice quality, great models, generous quantity, but hardly perfect or even representative of all that Japan has to offer.

12-18-09  07:43am

Replies (14)

Shown : 26-50 of 187 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.73 seconds.