Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : mbaya (356)  

Feedback:   All (1157)  |   Reviews (176)  |   Comments (129)  |   Replies (852)

Other:   Replies Received (685)  |   Trust Ratings (89)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 187 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit Sexually Broken

Sexually Broken
(1)

92.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill
-147 MP4 HD videos 1280x720, 6000k. Simply beautiful quality.
-Photo sets(1200x675)of each shoot are zip downloadable.
-Each update comes with a few sample photos and a fairly complete description of the action. For me a huge plus.
-Updates every Monday , Wednesday and Friday for three updates a week
-Nice variety of models: Black, Asian, Latina, blondes, brunettes, redheads. Some very petite, such as under 5 feet tall. Some are large, but not plus size. A few have tattoos or piercing, but most do not. Some have implants, but most do not. Most are well known porn stars, but many are not.
-Unusually high level of attractive models.
-Genuine enthusiasm. The models love the action as each one has multiple intense orgasms.
-Extremely creative content.
Cons: -The photo sets are split into two parts. One is Directors Picks and the other is called Scene Photography. Since both have scenes from the video, I have no idea why they are split into two sections.
-The videos have interviews, both before and after the scenes. The pre shoot interview may be at the beginning or at the end. In some videos the sex starts first, then the post then the pre shoot interview. Comes across as unpredictable and random. The rest of the site and its contents show a lot of thought, so why?
-Only two male models. One is Matt, who runs the site and an unnamed Black man with a huge penis.
-Neither male model cums, except in only one scene. This is hard to believe and I suspect has been edited out. In the forum Matt explained that cumming reduces his sexual energy. I think that scenes can end with a cum shot without taking anything away from the overall quality.
-Updates listed in date order only. There is a way to search by name, but no search engine.
Bottom Line: This site features a combination of bondage and sex. I am not into bondage or BDSM of any kind, but I like forceful, even rough sex. Everyone has biases, so you should know where I am coming from. This site is definitely different from plain vanilla porn and is not for everybody. The action can be quite intense, but not over the top crazy like many BDSM sites.

Honestly, I was thinking about joining a few weeks ago, but the recent events in Cleveland turned me off big time. What those women endured was more than enough to make me think I should not join. But I am glad that I did. The reality was disgusting, but the fantasy presented here is very, very different.

What this site features are very attractive models who get very intense multiple orgasms in every scene. The enthusiasm is genuine. Interestingly , the male talent and site owner Matt cums in only one scene. It is not focused on him and his pleasure. There are no misogynistic insults and no verbal disrespect. He asks them about their sexual preferences and that is what they get.

Scenes start with the model getting tied up and then they pleasure Matt orally. There may be vaginal penetration, but anal is uncommon. He encourages them to perform well with nice words and the promise of a reward soon-usually an orgasm by vibrator or a sybian. Multiple, very intense orgasms are the norm. Matt goes all out to please, although he never performs cunnilingus. I guess we all have our limits.

The models are generally attractive porn stars. Some are well known, some less so. Some models are former dancers or athletes with nice bodies. There is a lot of ethnic variety, as well as by body type.

The inevitable comparison is with Sex and Submission. While that site focuses on a scenario and has a few different locations, this site is more like gonzo. There is only one video with a story and the location is always the same. I like a little bit of story and a little bit of acting. I enjoyed this site a lot, but it is clear that there is room for improvement.

With three updates a week, this site is a solid A+ in my book.

05-26-13  01:27pm

Replies (4)
Review
2
Visit Gag Factor

Gag Factor
(1)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Very attractive models, practically without exception
-Hot, intense face fucking action
-The behind the scenes videos show that the models are not mistreated, but are shown
respect. Given the nature of the action, this was a surprise.
-Some age and ethnic variety. Some models as old as 30 as well as a few Asian, Black and Latina .
-Works well with download managers and fast downloads.
-Not the best quality videos, so you get small files.
-No download limits.
-Fairly large archive of 241 videos.
-Low quality photos, but at least there is one set for every scene. Not much of a plus.
-Billed through CCBill
-Comes with access to American Bukkake, Ghetto Swarm, Overstuffed Holes and Hardcore Fuck Machines.
Cons: -Archive site. It is hard to tell when the last update was added.
-Recycled old updates are listed with current dates as if they were just added.
-Advertised on members page as a new video is added every Tuesday. Not true.
-ĒWelcome to the new GagFactor.com website! ď Nothing new here in several years.
-A total of 241 videos. Sounds goods but only 74 are at least 640x480. The rest are very weak quality at 320x240.
-Can download as WMV only. Most have short low quality clips also available as an option.
-Photos are not available as a zip file. You get only a few photos, between 12 and 100 for each set. Most sets are between 40 and 60 photos. The quality ranges from 150x100 to 750x500. Even the best are pathetically low quality.
-No search engine of any kind. All you get are the updates and a tiny face photo.
-The bonus sites are also weak with about the same statistics.
Bottom Line: I was last a member here in October of 2009. Not much has changed in all this time. Then it was clear that the site started in 2003 and that the oldest videos and photo sets were of low quality. Now they have recycled the older material and slapped a new date on it. It is hard to know the exact age of anything. The oldest dates are now 2008.

The most ďrecentĒ update says the date for it is March 27, 2013. It comes in at 320x240 and I still have the scene in my hard drive from when I downloaded it in 2009. I guess I canít expect complete honesty from a porn site, But come on, I am not that stupid.

The content is hard face fucking that is reasonably respectful towards the models. This is clear from watching the behind the scenes videos. No hair pulling, spitting, name calling or downright misogyny here. The women drool a lot and have very messy faces. But, also it is not what you would expect from a blow job site. It is hardcore mouth slamming face fucking. Nothing soft and loving here.

Most of the content is enjoyable as they try hard to make the most of every scene. If they only had better quality. Of the 241 videos only 74 are adequate at a minimum of 640x480. The best are 720x480, but there are only 11 of them. The rest are only 320x240. What a shame as many are great scenes but unwatchable.

Most cumshots are in her mouth, not on her face. Most are with her head below the guy, such as hanging off the side of a bed. In her mouth is fine with me, but I donít care for the angle of the cumshot. In any form of BJ I expect to see a pretty face and maybe some of her body. Upside down heads donít make women look beautiful. In particular there are several where that is all you see for the entire video. If I saw her in another video or even walking down the street, I would not even guess it was the same person.

For me I feel that they have some good ideas here, but donít care any longer about the site. They should improve the look, feel and navigation. With no search engine as well as no ability to download the photos as zips,it just isn't user friendly. Long ago they should have recoded the videos to better quality. I guess they just want to continue making $29.95 a month as long as they can get away with no effort.

03-28-13  12:15pm

Replies (1)
Review
3
Visit Rodney Moore

Rodney Moore
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill
-No download limit
-Very large site. TBP review states 1375 video scenes as of May.
-Models are a nice mix of races, ages, body types, you name it. He even has Bridgett the Midget.
-Excellent attempt to modernize the site by remastering the older videos and replacing the older ones. They are presently updating almost daily. In June there were 21 updates in 30 days. There are still many hundreds left to do.
-Works well with download manager. Fast enough downloads and I was able to do six at a time. I did about my max on Verizon Fios, 2.4MB.
-Rodney loves women with pubic hair. For me this is a turn on.
-Rodney loves women, PERIOD. He compliments them, eats their pussies, and generally does whatever it takes to make a scene work for both parties. He makes his partner feel appreciated with a refreshingly respectful approach.
-Nearly every scene is a creative scenario. Some are well done, many are not. Rodney has a sense of humor that is often very effective
Cons: -Prechecked cross sales when you sign up
-Many videos not yet upgraded and are poor quality Quicktime and not downloadable. I could not find specs for these, but they are not watchable. Grainy and tiny, my best guess is something like 240x120 or something along those lines.
-Quite a few videos are not yet downloadable as a whole video, only as MPEG1 clips,barely watchable. No specs for these but are something like 480x320.
-The most recent videos are nowhere near HD at 960x540, 2643 kbps.
-Oldest photos are very poor quality screenshots. These are not zip downloadable either.
-The most recent photo sets are barely acceptable at 1280x800, zip downloadable. Small sets of under 30 photos.
-Confusing navigation. If you want a particular model, she may have a video but you may not see her name listed. Also, some models have inconsistent spelling. The model directory has her as Jynx Maze, but the welcome page has Jinx Maze.
-Rodney loves to worship womenís feet. Not my fetish.
Bottom Line: Rodney Moore specializes in videos where his Rodney blasts are on his partnerís face. He also loves to use women who sport hairy bush. Trimmed, untrimmed, he loves them all. If these are not to your taste, this site is not for you.

If you went to a video store in the 90ís or even the 00Ēs, Rodneyís videos were to be found in large numbers. He had several different series, such as Horny Hairy Girls, Monster Facials and She Swallows. The content is similar in all the videos. He uses a scenario to start the scene. In one he is buying a house and gets the real estate agent to have sex with him. Or, a woman answers an ad for something he is selling. Sometimes he tries to use humor, like finding a woman in the closet or in a garbage can. In total he has more than 1500 scenes, so there is a lot of material that he could eventually post on his site.

In most scenes, there is a lot of foot worship, pussy eating etc. He is very complimentary to the women, telling them how beautiful they are and how much he wants to have sex with them. Many of the models are very attractive, even beautiful, but most are average or a bit better looking. No fake breasts, almost zero tattoos, light or no makeup, they appear to be normal everyday women who appear to be doing just this one video. No stripper clothes or slutty outfits, what you see are women wearing everyday clothes that they take off. There are also some softcore videos of public or semipublic nudity and some that focus on teasing up the skirt or showing their rack, butt or pussy. Nice. Some of the women are porn stars, like one of Sylvia Saint, but most are not. There is vaginal, anal and of course blowjobs. Some of the vaginal is missionary and not the usual way that vaginal is shown.

What is frustrating about the site is that the material is old. The cameras were not the best, so even remastering the videos does not guarantee excellent results. If the original is just ok or poor, the best you can do to improve it is nowhere near HD. Many videos are of very poor quality and cannot be downloaded. That is a shame, as I got the feeling of being tantalized with material that I canít enjoy. Some of it looks very interesting, but non downloadable Quicktime? Many videos are only slightly better, but can be downloaded only as clips. If you want HD, you wont find it on this site. Even the best videos on the site should be watched on a computer screen, but not on an HD TV.

I have read many of us say that pregonzo video was a lot better. Many have stated that they liked some degree of pubic hair. It is easy to fall into the trap of thinking that the past was better just because we donít care for much of todayís porn. The truth is, when I saw these videos I did feel that these were better than what we get today; it is not just nostalgia. It is not that our memory plays tricks on us. If you liked Rodney then, you will like him today as well.

07-08-12  11:40am

Replies (7)
Review
4
Visit Blow Bob

Blow Bob
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill. However does not take Visa or American Express. I had to use my bank account for the first time ever on any site.
-Six day full access trial for only $15. That is more than enough time to download everything as it is not a huge site and may not even be updating.
-There are 64 models, 32 are Black, five are Latina and the rest are White. Nineteen are most definitely plus sizes, BBW. They do the best blow jobs on this site. Most have multiple videos and photo sets. Bob sure does like bigger women.
-Videos are recently in WMV HD at 1280x720 and many older ones are being remastered. No options as to the download format.
-Wonderful enthusiastic blow jobs as this is the only requirement for being on the site. Bob doesnít care about the models looks, just how well they perform bjs and in some cases hand jobs. I saw only one video out of 158 with vaginal and only one with anal.
Cons: -No zip downloads for small photo sets of about 50 each.
-Newest photos are 1600x1200 and older ones are smaller. Some old sets from 2002 are 340x240.
-No search engine. It is difficult to find what content there is on the site. You can click on a models photo and then it lists what photo sets or videos she has. Not listed alphabetically by models name or by date added to the site. Very simple site design that is not very professional.
-If you are looking for just photo sets, good luck as there is no separate section. There is a section for video clips and there are 158 with each about 10 minutes.
-May not be updating. There is no labeling by date and there is no section of recent updates. The few videos that are mentioned as recent additions have a copyright date of January 2011 on them. The most recent photo sets offered for sale without a membership is copyright June of 2011.
Bottom Line: This site features a man named Bob who runs the site and is almost the only stunt cock. You never see his face and he never takes the focus away from the women. He treats them with total respect and provides interesting model information. He tells you how he met them and how much he enjoys their blow jobs. Sometimes there are some hand jobs to be seen here. The blow jobs are not at all forceful or demeaning as you may see on some sites. No name calling, hair pulling, or spitting. Bob is having a great time and so are his women. His camera work is done by two of his models. It is decent, focused and direct. Some shots are POV and some are from the side. No crazy angles or attempts at making art here, just simple and erotic. Most of the models have pretty faces and with POV you donít see a lot of their sometimes very large bodies. I donít care for BBW much, so I consider that a plus.

What you get are enthusiastic blow jobs by women who love giving their partners pleasure. Bob adores interracial bjís and if you do you will like his videos. The photo sets are mostly of the shoots, but sometimes of the models getting nude from the waist up with mostly very large breasts on display here. A handful of the models are simply beautiful by anyoneís standards, such as Black Barbie. If you go to the tour page she is the statuesque Black model to be seen from the side. A few are a bit older like Hotlips Melanie. She is so enthusiastic in her bjs that I swear she gets more out of them than does Bob. She looks to be in her fifties and is no beauty, but her videos have to be seen to be believed.

The videos are all exclusive and for the most part so are the models. Three or four have their own websites though.

The trial for six days is adequate in that the site is just not that big. It has been around since 2002, so I donít think it ever updated often. It may not even be updating any more. If you insist on paying entirely too much, you can skip a membership and buy 60 to 80 minute videos for about $27, or individual photo sets at about $7 to $9.

Nice content, but a site with a lot of flaws and is just not very big.

05-28-12  11:37am

Replies (2)
Review
5
Visit Met Art

Met Art
(2)

95.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill
-Discount through PU
-Huge site with over 2000 models and over a million photos. Archives go back to 1999.
-Nearly every model is absolutely drop dead gorgeous with few exceptions.
-Models are natural in that there are no tattoos or implanted breasts. Most are shaved, but many are not.
-Six updates daily.
-Zipdownload photo option with three choices, large, medium and small
-Three video download choices, MP4, AVI and WMV. The AVI is the best quality. HD quality at 1280x720.
-No download limits. Works with download manager.
-Great search engine. Without it, the site would be unnavigable. Even with it, many searches provide over a thousand photo sets. This can be daunting if you are trying to get to them all.
-User rating system for photographers, models, photo sets and videos. You can search by ratings.
-Wonderful, very complete tour that lets you see what you will get.
Cons: -Not very fast downloads. I got speeds of about 600KB and my FIOS conenction maxes out at 2400.
-The largest photo files are huge, ranging from 200MB to over 1GB. Individual photos can be as much as 6MB.
-Close to zero ethnic variation. Nearly all models are thin Eastern Europeans between 18 and 25.There are a few Asian, Black and Latina models and they are exceptionally beautiful. I just wish there were more.
Bottom Line: I donít usually sign up for big well known sites that have many reviews as I prefer niche sites. However, I felt in the mood for a photo site that had so many nice reviews, as well as a very low discounted price. I love the quantity and quality of the models and the photo sets. This is overall a truly great site that deserves the many wonderful reviews. I will focus primarily on the videos as I am much more a into them than photos anyway. The previous reviews were much more focused on the photos and I feel did notappreciate the videos.

I was impressed by the videos here. The models are almost without exception drop dead gorgeous. At present there are 1077 videos and are now being updated more so than in the past. As of today, 30 new videos have been posted this year. They added 106 in 2011.

The quality is HD, DVD level stunning and most videos are outdoors. Usually lighting is a negative in outdoor photos and videos, but mostly that is not a problem here. There are a few videos of public nudity that were just ok. Some were not really public, as you are directed to scenes in a forest or a deserted beach. Some of these were hot, but the majority were not very effective at creating eroticism.

Across the board, the camera work is outstanding and the videos are generally shot by the same photographers who shoot the photosets. This leads in many cases to the videos being either a video of a photo shoot, very boring, or suffer from a lack of direction that makes the videos look like moving photo sets, also some what boring. But there are also many that do work and are very erotic.

I like the work done here by Luca Helios. He generally gets the models to flirt with the camera in most of his videos. There is also a little teasing and even a few showcase a bit of stripping. No dancing though. They have a rating system on the site and he has the number one slot with a video featuring Dominika A called "Parusa". She walks past some shops, enters a room, and slowly removes her clothing, piece by piece. She gets to total nudity at 3:37 and spends the rest of the video, about four minutes, in a chair and on a bed showing us her body in slow motion. No masturbation here, this is all for our pleasure. She shows everything and is very explicit. Nothing artsy about this; it is the good stuff. He also has a video starring Jenni A called Carefree that I really like. She comes walking down stairs inside a house, bottomless, and walks towards the camera and teases. This goes on for about ten minutes. She is simply gorgeous and knows how to create a mood. Great direction in a video that works.

I also appreciated the videos by Goncharov, especially Ksucha C in a video called Lathin. She is not much to look at, but is great at teasing. She goes to a home in the forest wearing a short skirt. She teases us continually with pussy peeks up her dress, while not wearing panties. Very hot.

While many videos are not worth downloading unless you just love a particular model, there are some true gems here. I appreciate eroticism that focuses on putting on a good show.

As a total package, I would give this site at least a 95 for the sheer quantity and quality.

As a video site, I think it is fair to compare it to the videos on other photo sites. It is number one in that category in my book. Compared to other soft core sites, in the area of videos of solo females without masturbation, I think it can hold its own. I would give it at least an 85. There are just too many videos of photo shoots and posed videos to go for a higher score.

05-06-12  05:20pm

Replies (4)
Review
6
Visit African Goddesses

African Goddesses
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Beautiful African models. Some are thin, but most are amazingly voluptuous with beautiful faces and extra large breasts. Nothing fake or artificial here.
-Amateurs. All the models appear only on this site.
-The videos are nearly all stripping from either lingerie or ethnic African outfits. Very exotic.
-No DRM
-Works with download managers
-No interviews. The models don't even speak. The videographer is never in the video nor do you hear them.
-The models look directly at you and don't ever look bored, jaded or mechanical.
Cons: -Billing is through an unusual biller and no billing choices are available.
-Your password is sent to you at your email address. This concept worked, but every time you log in, you must reenter the password.
-The photos are small at 1024x768.
-No zipdownload option.
-The picture sets are small. Most are less than 50 photos, some as few as 10.
-The videos download, but with only one option. They are in WMV 640x480, but reasonably sharp considering they are not HD.
-Barely updating. See below.
Bottom Line: This site is of softcore photos and stripping videos of natural African women. The focus is on some of the most beautiful women on the planet.

I was last a member in August of 2008. In the nearly three and a half years that have passed, I have found my appreciation for the videos has remained. I really want to love this site as its content is wonderful.

How can I describe its contents? I love what they have. The women make the site. However, there is no sex, not even masturbation. The nudity is very tasteful, something like Playboy style. Tease is a key word here. Personally, I would prefer a litle more explicitness, but the site is made so that it leaves some to the imagination.

However, it has some very serious negatives. The worst is that it almost is a zombie site, with only three updates in 2011 and three in 2010. In the past, there were 11 in 2009, 16 in 2008, 20 in 2007 and 22 in 2006.

Further, the video quality is only 640x480. They were watchable, but I hope for better. The photos are also out of todays expectations, coming in at 1024x768.

I get the feeling that the site's owners don't care much about making the site better.

I would definitely recommend the site if you love this type of content. However, I waited three and half years between sign ups and the site is almost the same with about 20 updates. I can't see joining in less than another few years.

02-22-12  11:38am

Replies (7)
Review
7
Visit HQ Upskirt

HQ Upskirt
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Choice of billing companies. Available choices are CCBill, Segpay and Zombaio.
-True high definition videos at 1280x720.
-Works with download managers. Downloads were fast as the file sizes are under 100MB for at most five minutes.
-No download limits.
-New videos every day and recently a new set of around 30 photos are also being posted daily. As of today there are 239 videos and 1439 photos.
-Mostly very attractive women with nice legs. Even the paid models seem very natural and not glam. The feeling you get is that you may see these women in the street.
-The site offers a way to communicate with other members, invite a friend, create a profile and upload your own videos and photos. Nice features that so far are not being used.
Cons: -Only one download choice, MP4. Maybe it is my computer, but I have trouble with that type of file. I converted the videos to AVI using AVI Media Converter.
-The photos do not have the option of being zipdownloaded.
-The most recent photos are only 1200x800. Not quality in todays porn.
-Practically no variety in the models. Nearly every one is white, thin and in their early 20s.
-Very softcore. Until recently the most you would see is a view of panties under a skirt.
Bottom Line: This site has changed its focus over the nine months it has been online. The oldest videos show a cameraman following women on the streets around town. At some point he gets a camera into position close to the model and gets film of what the woman is wearing underneath. The feeling that comes across is of an invasion of privacy on unknowing women. I feel that the issue of consent is important and these scenes made me feel a bit uncomfortable. How the cameraman kept from getting hit by his victims or even arrested is a mystery. If these scenes were staged, they did a really good job of making them seem unscripted and unrehearsed.

Most scenes were filmed in Russia, as you can clearly see writing in their alphabet. Some scenes were filmed in Guatemala as well. I suspect they were filmed for another site as they often have watermarks for Spyguate, a name I don't recognize. The photos from this time are similar in theme and style.

More recently, there is a distinct change in style. Professional, non glam Russian models play up to the camera in unabashed exhibitionism. The models are attractive and create a good sexy show. There is some nudity, a lot of tease, making nice videos that make me want to watch them over and over. There is a pleasing balance of whole body and closeups. Many of the models have multiple videos, with different levels of tease and different locales.

The photo sets also have been featuring professionals in scenes that can only be described as exhibitionist. There is a feeling of sexiness, even in photos that are not totally nude.

My overall impression is of a site that has found its place as tease, with some partial nudity. The sexiness is undeniable. With daily updates, and a winning formula, I can see myself resubscribing.

01-18-12  03:11pm

Replies (4)
Review
8
Visit Only CFNM

Only CFNM
(0)

65.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill.
-Part of network of fetish websites, hardglam.com. Many have similar themes.
-Has three choices of video downloads. The best is HD at 1920x1080, 10378 kbps. Excellent. There is a lesser quality download at 854x480, 927 kbps and FLV streaming.
-Photos are zipdownloadable at 1900x1262 and at 1200x797. Most sites do better, but these are acceptable.
-No download limits.
-Works with download managers.
-Delicious English accents.
Cons: -Apparently not updating any longer. Presently has 27 videos, TBP has them at 25 in June of 2009. Another review site has them at 25 in May of 2010.
-Zero search capability. Listed in what I guess was date order only, but without any dates posted.
-I found the concept of a fetish within a specialized niche to be a bit strange, as well as hard to get used to. See below.
-Practically no plot, almost gonzo. Other CFNM sites I have joined have plots that make the action have a sexy context. You don't get nudity, so at least I expect my imagination to get stimulated.
Bottom Line: I have previously been a member of two other CFNM sites that I rather enjoyed. On those sites what I appreciated were sexy ladies doing for fun what on most gonzo type sites are done for male pleasure. For example, why would a woman suck a guy's cock while fully clothed, except that she really wants to do it? After all, he is doing nothing for her. Usually the women seem to be enjoying themselves. Further, a sexy woman in hot clothes gets my imagination going.

What about on this site? Zero imagination. The pretext for the action is usually so weak that it is just unbelievable. This is not fantasy, it is just gonzo, straight to the blow job sex. I like blow jobs as much as the next guy, maybe more so, but every video is the same. Besides that, the content available is just too little. At least if they were updating, you could see the site improving. Only two updates in close to two years is pathetic.

The next problem area came as a surprise. The reason I joined was that I like blow jobs, especially in top quality HD. However, nearly all the videos have the women smoking before, during and after the bj. Its bad enough I had to get used to shaved women in porn, but smoking? I tried, but I simply can't get used to it. I could never have sex with a woman who smoked, even if not in front of me. Smoking is a dirty, unhealthy habit that makes a woman smell and is not at all sexy, sorry. I did not realize how strongly I felt on this topic until this site. I kept telling myself, focus on the bj, focus on how hot the women are, etc. I like a lot of niche, even fetish material, but this site reached my limit.

A fetish within a niche website most definitely limits its market. No wonder this is an archive site.

07-31-11  08:05am

Replies (2)
Review
9
Visit Bukkake Bath

Bukkake Bath
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill.
-Works with Downthemall.
-No download limit.
-Has 483 bukkake, gangbang and gokkun (cum eating or swallowing) censored dvds, most scenes over an hour. Of these, 379 are full scenes at 720x480, 1480 kbps. the rest are only in parts and the quality varies, but definitely a bit less.
-Has 82 censored big breast dvds. Large by anyone's standards, huge by Japanese. Most around DD to G cups.
-66 female ejaculalion censored dvds.
-Has 60 urabon (uncensored) dvds
-Has a directory of Japanese adult film stars
-10,516 photos. Poor quality screenshots that are mostly facial vidcaps. Average around 500x700 and blurry.
Cons: -The videos are at barely acceptable quality.
-The photos are not worth bothering with.
-The navigation here is a nightmare as there is no search engine. Everything is in chronological order only.
-Unclear how often it updates. It appears that dvds are added daily though.
Bottom Line: Within the field of Japanese dvd videos, this site specializes more than anything else in the specific niche of bukkake, gangbang and gokkun, which is cum eating. As such, they claim to be the largest site on the internet with such content. Prior to joining this site, I was a trial member of Asiamoviepass, a bigger site overall and with almost as much of this specific content.

The videos are of course not exclusive. The dvd's are not specifically shot for any site, so many can be found on other Japanese sites. What you get here is an undeniably huge collection that specializes in one particular niche though.

In spite of censorship, the videos are quite entertaining in that the focus is on cum shots and cum eating. As only genitals are blurred, the videos are not censored to the point of ruining the eroticism. The very large number of guys involved makes for some extreme scenes. Fifty to 100 guys is not unusual and drinking the resulting huge amounts of cum is not uncommon. Some scenes are quite creative, although in most scenes the model just sits on the floor and the guys cum on her face and body. Many scenes are all too predictable.

Since most scenes average around a gigabyte, you have to be selective regarding what you want to save. I saved about 100 dvd's, which is only a small percentage of the site. However, over 100 GB is plenty in my opinion.

There are also 104 dvd's that are of lower quality and are split into parts. Many of these are in the process of being recoded to higher quality. Some scenes are from the US dvd series American Bukkake. Other scenes feature other Western women and come from other dvd series that I don't recognize.

My overall impression here is that it is an older site with low quality, but large considering that it is a niche site. It is a bit behind the times as a site, but the dvds are most definitely interesting and entertaining.

06-30-11  08:08am

Replies (2)
Review
10
Visit German Goo Girls

German Goo Girls
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Inexpensive trial option with full access.
I paid $4.95 for three days.
-Some of the most extreme videos in the genre of gangbangs/bukkake. Not for those who are not interested in intense visuals.
-Works with downthemall download manager, but not maxing out my capacity of 2.5 MBS on Fios.
-Comes with 15 websites. Extremebukkake.com is similar in theme and has 98 movies, 2891 photos.
-The site has 463 movies and 20,676 photos.
-There is no download limit.
Cons: -Uses a biller that I have never seen before-http://e-support24.bzdescsupport.com. I have not cancelled yet, so I cannot say anything about them.
-Unique style of camerawork. Very dark, but very much a blast of light right at the target. This makes for oversaturation on the model, but otherwise low lighting. Cum glistens and sparkles. Not my cup of tea.
-Photo sets are zipdownloadable, but at 400x300 not worthwhile and they are only screencaps anyway.
-Claims that the site is updated daily. Almost all updates are for bonus dvds that are streaming only. This year there have been only 8 updates to Extremebukkake and this site has 39, but not at any schedule that I could figure out.
-Most of the video descriptions are in English, but some are in German only.
Bottom Line: I was last a member here in December of 2008 and there have been a few changes.

At that time I was pretty upset that I was charged for additional sites just because I clicked on the Hot Sites link. It was a stand alone site and not part of a network. Soon after PU decided not to do business with them.

Now you get a network that gives you 15 sites. How do you get there?-by clcking on the Hot Sites link. This time I did not get extra charges, but did get extra sites.

This site bills itself as having the hardest gang bangs on the internet. I have reviewed several other similar sites and I agree with them. The sex is nonstop, the cumshots continuous and the action is intense. There are some scenes on this site that I could not believe anyone would do, as they involve some unhealthy sex. Two examples are huge creampie gangbangs and another is anal gangbangs followed by swallowing the expelled cum. Sometimes the scenes are as creative as the best in Japanese porn, but often it seems the focus is much more on the quantity of cum and how many guys can she handle. This site makes Japanese gangbangs seem staged and unenthusiastic, as well as a bit tame, and that is saying a lot.

The models seem eager and even anxious to perform well. Most models are not exactly beauties, but some are. You don't join for their looks, but for their attitudes regarding sex.

Of the sites that I have reviewed recently, the enthusiasm level and effort on the part of the models is at least as good as is the case on Spermastudio.com or Britishbukkakegirls.The only real drawback is the style of shooting the videos, with a dark background and excessive light on the models. To some degree that is also true about the other German site, Spermastudio, but here it is more distracting.

If you are ready for a site that gives you videos of extreme sex, you should enjoy this site. If you like plain vanilla sex and sites, stay away, far, far away.

06-23-11  11:19am

Replies (1)
Review
11
Visit Body Parts.biz

Body Parts.biz
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Billing through CCBill.
-Frequent updates. "UPDATE SCHEDULE: Softcore Video Clips - Three times/week. Hardcore Video Clips - Twice/week. Softcore Photos - Three times/week. Hardcore Photos - Once/week. Amateur Photos - Three times/week. Body Parts Photos - Three times/week. Amateur Video - Three times/week."
-Really large site. I counted 774 videos, most about 2 minutes. There are 928 photosets and 140 models.
-Videos are HD at 1280x720, 3776 kbps. At this level five to seven minute videos are close to 1GB.
-Works with download managers.
-Not done in glam style. The models, aged 18 to 25, look very real, although not all are amateurs.
-Many hairy bushes although most are shaved.
-A few have tattoos, but no fake breasts.
-Some ethnic variety, but none in body shape as nearly all are very thin.
Cons: -Many of the videos are clips of a longer one, which is not offered as whole video. The video count is deceptive. My best guess is that the actual count is about 250 to 350.
-Photo sets are not zipdownloadable. Advertised as 2400x1600, they are often grainy. I used 1200x800, which is not that good. Many photos were still grainy.
-The photo sets are very repetitious. After a few sets, a closeup of a vagina looks like the last closeup of one.
Bottom Line: This site is run by Frannie Addams, who is the photographer, videographer and apparently the only one who works on the site. She has a blog where she makes entries once a month. In it she talks about upcoming additions to the site, which sounds like advertising if you ask me. There is no user interaction.

The focus here is on as she calls it "the closest close-ups on the web". The photos and videos feature breasts, butts, and especially, vaginas. Interestingly, she also realizes that the tongue and mouth in erotic poses can be highly stimulating. I have rarely seen softcore shots like this, although occasionally as part of blow job scenes.

With the videos in HD quality, sometimes the closeups are a bit too much. I don't care to see every pore or even each individual hair. However, it is not as much a gynecolgy lesson as is inthecrack.com.

The comparison here is a fair one. I believe these two sites are the only ones that use the up close focus. Inthecrack.com focuses to a large degree on butt views, whether of the ass crack or the vagina. This site has a few of these photos and videos, but its focus is on the vagina full frontal. Both are big sites, both are in HD and both can be hit and miss regarding the erotic. This site bills itself as amateurs, but I think most are pornstars or professional models. I know I recognized many and found a few more on the internet. The approach is one of natural looking models, not glam as inthecrack.com uses. Here most, if not all, models are American. Inthecrack.com has Europeans as well as Americans. Just my opinion, but I liked this site better despite its flaws.

The site is big enough and is high quality in its videos. In contrast, the photo sets are somewhat disappointing in quality. Although I can enjoy closeups of body parts, sometimes the focus is just TOO focused and misses that special intangible quality that makes a model work for me.

06-17-11  09:24am

Replies (0)
Review
12
Visit We Love Bukkake

We Love Bukkake
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: BBB is Britishbukkakebabes.com, GBC is gangbangclub.com, and WLB is welovebukkake.com
-Bill through Epoch
-Part of Realsexpass network that has 18 sites in total.
-Three solid sites that focus on the theme of bukkake and gangbangs.
-These sites contain a total of 215 videos and 128 photo sets.
-Excellent videography. This is very difficult in this genre as the action can sometimes resemble a three ring circus.
-Works with download managers.
-GBC and WLB update videos once a week, but BBB stopped updating in August of 2010.
-GBC updates photo sets weekly, but BBB (last updated 5/9/10) and WLB (last updated 10/22/8) are no longer updating photos.
-Most models are genuine amateurs who seem truly to be having a great time.
Cons: -Videos are 640x480, 1643 kbps for BBB and WLB, but reasonably sharp anyway. GBC is a little better at 720x400, 2650 kbps. Far from HD quality, but definitely watchable.
-BBB does not have a way to download whole videos and nearly all videos are at least 2 parts.
-Photos are weak at 800x532 for BBB, 480x640 for WLB and screencaps only for GBC.
-Not every video has a photoset.
-Poor search capability. The search engine gives no results. There is no way to search across sites in the network. The only way to look is on the link called "Our girls". Not listed alphabetically, but chronologically from the date their updates appear.
Bottom Line: Realsexpass is a network of 18 sites. The topics covered vary quite a bit, but most did not really interest me. I joined for the three sites that have similar themes of bukkake and gangbangs. These sites differ a bit, but they are worth reviewing as a group.

Britishbukkakebabes focuses on oral blowbangs. Most cum shots are in the mouth with a lot of cum swallowing. There is some gangbang action, but not a lot. It has not been updated since August of 2010. Many scenes are only available as clips, not whole scenes. While most of the models appear to be amateurs, the star here is the Brit porn star Sandy Caine. IMDb lists her with 30 titles. Not the best looking woman in porn, her many scenes here have to be seen to be believed. EXTREMELY enthusiastic and full of sexual energy. There are also quite a few interracial scenes of black men and white women.

Welovebukkake is similar in its content, but is bigger and is still updating. The scenes are longer and are not split into clips. In my opinion the star here is Thai Suzie. She just loves cum and is a born pornstar. The site is mostly amateurs though.

Gangbangclub is a bit different in that the action is focused on gangbangs with vaginal and anal sex predominating. This is definitely the site to go to for harder sex. I didn't notice any creampies, sorry if that is something you are looking for.

The sites have in common a genuine amateur feel. Welovebukkake advertises that they have teens, housewives and milfs. I can believe that as many of the women don't have the greatest bodies, but they are real. No excessive makeup, fake tits, boob jobs, few tattoos or piercings. Some are barely legal teens and early twenties, but most are thirtiesh and a few even older. Nearly all have pretty faces and smile a lot. What seems to be the reason they are on the site is that they think this is something they enjoy. Fun and enthusiasm are two words that come to mind.

In spite of the negatives I mentioned, I rather liked this group of sites.

06-08-11  11:26am

Replies (2)
Review
13
Visit Sperma Studio

Sperma Studio
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill
-Latest video updates are at HD specs, 1280x720, 3641 kbps. There are 80 videos in this category out of a total of 241. See below.
-Videos update about once per week.
-Every month there is a free download of a DVD of scenes from the site.
-Considerable natural enthusiasm. Not your typical porn with phony smiles and fake moans.
-Mix of great looking women and many that would not cut it on their looks. As a rule, the plain women are the most enthusiastic.
- A bit of ethnic diversity. There are several Asian women and even a Brazilian one.
-No download limits.
-Works with download managers.
-Everything here is exclusive and shot for the site.
Cons: -Very few photo sets.
-Photos are not zip downloadable.
-Small size photos only, 600x900. Small sets with few photos in them. Not worth downloading.
-Older videos are in FLV only. There are 161 videos in this category. Low quality 320x240. I used FLV Converter to both convert them to WMV and increase them to 480x320 and 2000 kbps. Still low quality, but much more watchable.
-Several of the women have tattoos and/or fake boobs.
-Standalone site with no extras.
Bottom Line: I have to thank gggfan for turning me on to this site. It was well worth the membership fee, which presently converts from the Euro at $34. The site has its flaws, but overall is pretty good. The website is German and there are no subtitles for the dialog.

What you see here are mostly gangbangs with about 10 to 15 guys. There are also some blowbangs (oral only), excellent glory hole scenes, and bukkake(only facials). A few of the gangbang scenes are mostly all oral. You get the feeling the gang bang models love oral, as they do have a choice. Incredibly, a few scenes are mostly anal. I have seen very few anal gangbang scenes ever on other sites. How many women, when offered the choice of oral, vaginal and anal, mostly pick anal for scenes with a gang? Here some models do this again and again in multiple scenes. All scenes on the site are messy and the guys cum when they are ready throughout the scene, not on cue as in most porn. There are a lot of facial endings, cum swallowing, internal creampies, although in some scenes the guy pulls out and cums on her pussy, ass, etc.

Most of the women featured here are a bit on the plain side. For me that is not much of a negative as they seem to be into the scenes and more than make up for their looks with total, all out enthusiasm. To say that they love cock and are addicted to cum seems more than obvious. The scenes with pros are not much less enthusiastic and many are great looking. The latest updates focus on a Brazilian woman named Tekohas. She must be a pornstar, as she is in the process of creating a website to promote herself. She is gorgeous and is as enthusiastic as anyone in porn. After reading an interview with her on her new site, you get the feeling that she would make porn for free if she didn't need money.

The major weakness here is that most of the videos are in FLV. You may need a special player for these. Another alternative I recommend is that you use FLV Converter and convert them to WMV 480x360, but 2000 kbps. They are then much better when seen on a computer monitor. On an HD big screen TV, not recommended.

The other weakness is in the photos. There are too few sets, too few photos in each set, and not zip downloadable. A minor weakness is that there no other sites come with it, no forum, nothing extra.

What you do get is over the top videos in a niche that all too often lacks personality.

06-01-11  11:58am

Replies (4)
Review
14
Visit Bare Maidens

Bare Maidens
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill.
-Inexpensive considering the high quality photos and videos and the size of the site.
-Downloadable videos are true HD 1920x1080, 4220 kbps. Crisp, clear and beautiful.
-Zip downloadable photosets. The better quality option comes in at 3450x4000.
-Mostly if not all American pornstars listed by first name only.
-Huge website. They claim it has 33 movies and 66,536 photos. I could not find that many videos, but this may be the true number. See below for comments about this.
Cons: -No choices as to video format. FLV is what you get. You may need a new video player for that as most will not work with these videos.
-Most videos have a long introduction to the sex part. Makes for huge files on your hard drive.
-Many of the photos are not all that explicit. Very softcore fantasies for the most part. In all fairness there are also some that include sex.
-Many photosets are so artistic that you may think they forgot that you came to the site to see women, not special effects.
-No way to search. The only way content is listed is under the model's name.
-Updates are not dated nor are they easy to find.
The site claims updates every three days and this is impossible to verify.
Bottom Line: This site is so unique that I feel it has no competition. It creates a fantasy world similar to that of Lord Of The Rings, Dungeons and Dragons, and World of Warcraft.

The action takes place on the planet Arta, and features its women who seek the power called Magice. They mostly get it by masturbating, but also from sex with both men and women. As a result, the site mostly features masturbation scenes in the videos. The photos are mostly nudes and stripping to nudity from outfits that come from this fantasy genre. Some examples are helmets, cloaks, and chainmail.

Sounds wonderful so far, but this site has a few flaws. One is that it is difficult to find the downloadable videos as they don't have a separate section. There is a link called "Theatre", which features streaming low quality videos. Read Maggies review and you will see she thought there were no videos to download. I don't think I got them all as I found 24 and the site claims 33.Considering the size of the site, navigation just should not be this difficult.

Downloads are slow on Internet Explorer, using IDM, about 500 to 600kbps. On Mozilla I used DTA and got about the same. I asked the webmaster about this and he claimed the usual speed is over 1MB per second. I also tried Google Chrome with IDM and got the speed he claims is usual.

Another problem is that the videos come in only one format-FLV. The webmaster suggested using Adobe Movie. Adobe's website states that the program has not been available since last December. I tried to find FLV players on the web, but none worked all that well. Eventually I converted the videos to WMV and lost a lot of the quality in the conversion. This took hours of effort on my part.

You may not care about all of this if your reason for joining is the photosets. The quality is most definitely first rate, although I thought most of the photos were more about the fantasy world than erotic. I did not join to see artistic special effects. There are a lot of photosets, as the site is more a photo one than a video one. Five years worth of updates makes for plenty to look at.

I give this site high scores for creativity, the high quality of both photos and videos and sheer size. If they only made the videos easier to find as well as downloadable in WMV or even AVI, this site could easily be worth in the 90's.

05-13-11  11:46am

Replies (1)
Review
15
Visit ATK Exotics

ATK Exotics
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Discounted price through TBP.
-Huge mega website. The site states over 1400 models and over 950,000 photos.
-Daily updates. The site states 4200 photos added weekly.
-The photos are zipdownloadable.
-No download limits.
-More Black models than any site I have ever seen, even including those specializing in them.
-The number of East Indian models is quite large. There are few on any site on the internet and this site is probably the biggest on the net for these women.
-Many well known models/pornstars. However most of the site appears to be amateurs who may be exclusive here.
-Listing of who the photographers are for each set. I found that I really appreciate R. Williams for example.
Cons: -Far too many tattoos and/or piercings.
-Not high quality videos. The most recent are 850x480, 1700 kbps. Way behind the times.
-Photos are nearly all about 600x1000 and some are 1600x1000. Many, many sites have better.
-Too many sets that are washed out color, overexposed, have little contrast, or miss the erotic by having the models' hands strategically placed where I don't want them. Many cut off parts of the model's body and look unnatural and definitely not erotic. For set after set I did not download a single photo.
-The search engine is virtually useless. I have no idea how many Black models there are for example.
Bottom Line: I was last a member here about four years ago. At that time I thought the site was very large, the videos mostly boring and of low quality and the task of downloading to be intimidating without some kind of search engine.

Mostly that is still all true. With daily updates the site has become HUGE though.

I appreciate that the site has so many ethnic models. I know of no other site that I can compare this to as far as quantity. My issue is much more with the quality.

The videos are mostly not all that. The softcore are mostly very blabby and the hardcore not terribly hot either. There are some masturbation scenes, blow jobs and some vaginal, but that is it. There is no anal for example.

The photos are mostly not my cup of tea either. There are too many where the fundamentals just are not what I expect from such a well known megasite. Some things that are not done right are photos that have the colors not adjusted properly, or have little contrast, are too dark, etc. Black models in dark photos just don't work. Neither do photos that have one after another of the model's hand covering her vagina. When did that become hot?

The search engine is useless. This was a problem four years ago and still is now. The various ethnicities make searches a matter of luck. I have seen the same model being labelled East Indian, Island, Black, Dime Pieces, Soft Core, Hard Core, Public, meaning outdoors etc. If you search solely by ethnicity you get lists by volume, with models in it that have no logical reason at all. I think they are listed in each volume because of the release date.

Far too many models have tattoos or piercings. I did a completely unscientific study of the Black models that I have so far downloaded. Of these 104, 41 had either tattoos or piercings. Some have both. Some are small and discrete, but far too many have multiple tattoos and most of these models have these tattoos on the abdomen, thighs, breasts, near their breasts, etc. UGH!, Not for me. At least I did not find any at all with fake breasts.

Overall I liked most of the models and most of the photography. What I feel is that the site needs to be rethought as to what goes into it and how to be more user friendly. Right now it seems to be too big to make sense.

02-22-11  07:02am

Replies (9)
Review
16
Visit Everything Butt

Everything Butt
(1)

95.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -It is a kink.com website. To me that is one that implies high quality videos and pictures, great models and easy navigation.
-Models love their work here and are generally very enthusiastic.
-Some interesting role play such as teacher and students or doctor and patient.
-True HD videos at 1280x720, 7158 kbps.
-Photos are not screenshots but real zipdownloadable photos at 1200x800.
-Updates every seven days.
-Discount of 30% off for a second kink.com website when you sign up.
Cons: -Cancelling can get complex. They have several different billers.
-Very limited ethnic diversity. The one Asian model is covered in tattoos and the Black one has only one scene and it is masturbation only.
-Many, many models have tattos and/or piercings.
-Many models wear latex or other fetish clothing. Not my cup of tea. I like real clothes.
-Nearly all scenes include enemas or anal fisting. These are turnoffs for me.
Bottom Line: In many ways this site has a lot in common with other kink.com websites. They are shot in the same armory, include some of the same models and have a theme of dom and sub. However, the theme here is only about female butts.

Their idea of focusing on butts is to cover just about everything imaginable that can possibly done with a female butt.

The videos include what they describe as ass worship, which is really a lot of analingus. Other acts to be found here include toy play that involves multiple dildos, beads and even other objects such as carrots and other vegetables, bowling pins, tennis rackets, cell phones and a few other assorted objects I would never think of using. Anal fisting is to be found in nearly every scene and so is the use of enemas. The models come prepared, so thankfully the water comes out clear. There is also a fair amount of anal sex,as you would expect. There is also some ass beating with whips just like other bdsm sites.

The early scenes are exclusively lesbian, but the more recent ones are mostly b/g. The site permits comments on each scene as well as a forum. Apparently the switchover from g/g to b/g with a few g/g scenes generated a lot of controversy among the members. Personally I found a lot of the lesbian scenes to be extremely hot, in spite of the fact that watching g/g scenes generally leaves me cold. Many of the b/g scenes had two females in them, so I did not have any complaints about this topic.

My general impression of the site is that no way is it for the casual fan of anal as it gets very intense. Definitely it is not for those who are squeamish. I would say it is a specialty site for those who like that sort of thing.

Now if they only had some ethnic diversity, even a few European models, this site would be incredible. Other kink sites have ethnic models I would love to see here. They should have more natural models without the tattoos and the piercings.

However, if what they do have is for you, it is a dream come true. It certainly has no genuine competition

02-11-11  02:14pm

Replies (3)
Review
17
Visit Josh Girls

Josh Girls
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill.
-Beautiful all natural breasts and no tattoos.
-Some gorgeous models. Brittany from Brittanysbod.com is a standout, but they also have Honey DeJour, Daphne Rosen, Alexis Silver and Africa.
-Updates every five days.
-Very simple site navigation.
Cons: -The site is too small for the price. There are 153 videos that are less than five minutes long. At $25 that is expensive.
-No photos at all.
-Only one download option-MP4.
-My computer did not provide video specs, but on another review site they listed the videos as 720 x 480 at 1600K. That sounds about right, as the quality is just ok.
Bottom Line: Josh loves models with huge natural breasts. This site is very, very softcore as some of the models are only topless. Most appear nude in their full natural glory though. No tattoos and no hair down below either.

Josh should have included photo sets, but the site appears to be a one man show. His function is to tape videos of the models. Sometimes he talks to them while he is taping and gives them directions. Another blabby director that hurts his videos. In contrast, many times there is annoying background music instead.

Most of the videos are of the models bouncing their breasts. He has them do jumping jacks, bounce on a ball, jog in place, sometimes holding a bar behind their head, or bounce on a trampoline. He loves to record their breasts making slapping sounds, twirling or just simply bouncing up and down. I found these to be entertaining, as well as unusual, but most definitely repetitious. As videos under five minutes each, they work just fine.

There also are a few, about five, videos that I liked a lot more. They were of the models either stretching and showing everything or a few were of stripping while they bounced their breasts.

Pretty much I liked the content, but the site was very far from perfect. My biggest gripe is that there just wasn't enough here. I had no trouble going through the site at a leisurely pace in only two days. The vid count stands at 153, but they are all very short. Updates come every five days, but that is not much when you get only a few minutes in each. There were no download options and no photos. These are serious drawbacks in my book.

I also did not get any customer service. One of the videos broke up and pixielated just at the right moment in a strip video. I checked the site and guess what? No link for customer service or to contact the site about anything. I sent an email through TBP, but no answer more than a week later. No service, just take your money.

I liked the content, but the site is too narrowly focused to attract at the $25 price. It should be no more than $15.

01-26-11  02:02pm

Replies (1)
Review
18
Visit Rimbledon

Rimbledon
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through vxsbill.com. I don't think I ever used them before, but cancelling was easy.
-Video choices are streaming, downloading the whole video or as clips.
-The videos are available as WMV 720x540, 2160 kbps. Not bad, but not HD either.
-A photo set for each video. Not screencaps.
-Photos are about 2000x1333.
-Comes as part of a network of 14 sites, five focus on anal or have a significant amount of it.
Cons: -The site stopped updating. The last one was 4/30/2009.
-Only 35 videos and photosets.
-Photos are not zipdownloadable.
-Very thin models. Mostly very plain.
-Not much enthusiasm.
-The actual deed is about three minutes of a fifteen minute video. Sometimes they do as little as one minute.
Bottom Line: The name of the site is a play on words concerning rim jobs, aka salad tossing or analingus. A recent PU poll showed about half personally would never do this, but about a third said they do. I personally would not, but as a kinky fantasy, I find it very erotic. Too bad the poll did not cover that.

If you like rim jobs on video, this site has that, but is not the best by any stretch of the imagination.

The biggest negative is that the site is not updating. Presently there are 35 videos and the most recent is from April of 2009.

The other big negative is that there just isn't enough ass licking on the site. The models seem to do as little as possible. The videos are about fifteen minutes long and the time spent on this ranges from one to maybe four minutes. They rarely seem to show any interest. Believe me, there are several better sites in this niche. There are only a few sites that this can be compared to, about five that focus on it that I know of, and this is the weakest.

These are Eastern European models and that may be the difference, as most sites that I have seen have American models who probably are acting. However, I will take transparently fake enthusiasm over bored going through the motions just to get it over with any day. I appreciate some admitted pretense of interest while performing in my fantasy.

The sex that you do see on the site is a bit of cock sucking in the beginning, almost always anal at some point and some vaginal. Most scenes end with a facial cumshot.I don't recognize any of the faces as well known Eastern European pornstars.

As part of a network it is just ok, but don't join for this site.

01-20-11  08:11am

Replies (11)
Review
19
Visit Throated

Throated
(1)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Discount through TBP.
-Part of a network of 11 sites. Comes with 3 other sites with a similar blow job theme-1,000facials.com, onlyteenblowjobs.com, and mommyblowsbest.com.
-Weekly updates.
-Archive of 313 videos going back to 2004.
-Videos are about 25 minutes to a half hour each.
-Videos have 5 download options in addition to flash. The best is WMV in true HD at 1920x1080, 5MBPS. There are also lesser quality downloads available so you can get smaller file sizes.
-Photos are zipdownloadable, not screenshots and the most recent are 1500x1000.
-Nice mix of portrait and landscape. Average about 200 photos per set.
-Easy navigation including a search function for scenes across the network.
Cons: -HD option started in September of 2009. Therefore only 70 of the 313 videos are in HD. Most of the site is in WMV 640x480 2MBPS. This is not a serious negative as the lesser quality videos are still very watchable.
-Mostly, if not all American pornstars. Slick and polished productions. I prefer more natural and more amateurs or at least a few more new faces.
Bottom Line: This site bills itself as "the number one deepthroat site on the net". "Since 2003 Throated.com has faithfully delivered the best in deepthroat blowjobs. No other site offers as many exclusive updates and new girls going balls-deep on massive cocks." It also mentions that you get to see the models take the deepthroat challenge, but never really elaborates as to what exactly that is.

The models try to deepthroat and take the cocks balls deep. They don't always succeed and if they do it usually is only once and for a few seconds at most. The plus here is that they usually show a good level of enthusiasm.

The blow jobs are not the most forceful I have ever seen. The guys often are somewhat assertive, but not aggressive, though. In this genre, I would put facialabuse.com as the hardest, gagfactor.com at a somewhat lower level and facefuckinginc.com next. This site is about the level of facefuckinginc.com- fairly nonabusive. There is no insulting the models, vomiting, or even much in the way of tears or smeared makeup. It is face fucking lite, if I can coin a phrase. I am not sure if I would rate it the number one deepthroat site on the net, but it was very enjoyable and worthwhile.

As part of a network of 11 sites, the deal here is quite attractive. The other three sites that focus on blow jobs are nice, but nothing terribly unusual. The models on the teen site were mostly very cute, but often you can see their inexperience. You can decide if that is a plus or minus. When you get the network you get a lot of HD quality porn at a quite reasonable price.

Definitely recommended.

01-12-11  09:39am

Replies (5)
Review
20
Visit Eat Some Ass

Eat Some Ass
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill.
-Discount through TBP.
-Has three other sites that come with it-spunkmouth, jizzonmyglasses and handjob.tv.
-Unusual niche. Very few websites specialize in this content. Ask me about others if you are curious.
Cons: -No zipdownload option for photos. 800x1200 is the best they have to offer.
-Most recent photoset shows photos taken 4/15/2006. This photoset is of Veronica Rayne who retired on June 11, 2010. She was active from 2005 to 2010.
-So I suspect that the site is no longer updating, in spite of the site stating daily updates.
-The "DVD quality" videos are 640x480, 1059 kbps. Not up to today's standards. Sounds like specs for 2006.
-Daily download limit of 3 GBs, then 24 hours until you can download again.
-No use of download managers allowed. However, Downthemall worked without any problems
Bottom Line: This site features mostly well known pornstars giving blow jobs and eating ass. Most scenes also have vaginal and a few even include anal.

While the ass eating is the focus here, in most videos it is only about five minutes at most out of a video of about 20 minutes.

For the most part the females are attractive well known pornstars such as Bree Olsen or Kelly Wells. The action ranges from all out enthusiasm such as in the video by Kelly Wells, to others who don't show much interest at all.

Because there are so few sites that feature this kind of action, I felt that I had to overlook some valid criticisms, such as low quality videos, an inability to zipdownload photos and a lack of updates, in figuring out a score. Unfortunately the other few sites that this can be compared to are also very weak. Unlike those, this site does not have the girls cover the guys ass in something like honey or chocolate syrup. Some may like that, but I have to draw the line at food.

The other sites that come with this one feature blow jobs on spunkmouth and jizzonmy glasses. Jizz I liked a bit better than spunkmouth. The other site, handjob.tv I found to be boring. The video quality and site design are identical for all these sites.

As far as this site, it is ok with some interesting videos in an unusual and hard to find niche. They could use a design overhaul as well as more and better quality videos.

01-05-11  06:35am

Replies (0)
Review
21
Visit Ripping 4 Fun

Ripping 4 Fun
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill without regional pricing
-Unusual, maybe even unique premise for a website.
-Very hot English pornstars and models with sexy accents. There are a total of 156 on the site. Some that I recognized were Lucy Zara, Lolly Badcock, Angel Long, Cate Harrington, Rio Mariah, and Satine Sparks.
-Has a little ethnic variety. There was one Indian and five Black models.
-Excellent quality videos, but not HD. There were 287 videos, WMV only at 960x540, 4066kbps.
-High level of enthusiasm by the models.
-Models talk dirty directly at the camera.
-Most videos are hypnotic. It is difficult to turn away.
-270 photosets, zipdownloadable at 959x1442. Not screencaps, real photos.
-Updates every five days with a new video or photo set.
-Has a forum where they take suggestions, however it is not very active.
Cons: -Too many scenes only go to panties. This may be unfair, but many do go to full nudity. Why not all or at least most?
-Too much focus on destroying clothes that have already been removed.
-Only WMV for downloading or streaming with no options as to quality.
-Videos averaged about five minutes each.
Bottom Line: In spite of a few negatives, this was a thoroughly enjoyable website. I found the videos to be hypnotic, even addictive. That is rare in porn, at least for me.

The premise here is that sexy English pornstars and models cut and rip off their clothes while talking directly to you the viewer. The models show a high level of enthusiasm and the fun factor here is contagious. The direction and scripting are excellent for the most part.

The best videos have the women talking dirty about showing you what they have under their clothes and how much they enjoy putting on a show for you. At their best, these videos go to full nudity with a fair amount of tease, both visually and with words. I loved the scenes where the model pops the buttons on her blouse to reveal her bra, or even better her massive tits. I also loved scenes where the model rips or cuts off her panties to show it all. Unfortunately these are only about 25% of the videos.

The rest show only the models going as far as panties. While these can be hot, I found them to be somewhat unsatisfying. Great models with great bodies, but I was left wanting more. These videos are still very watchable though.

The focus is more on destroying great looking clothes than on stripping. Great if this is your fetish or maybe even if you have a fetish for certain clothing, but I do not. I want more full nudity, not scenes where too much time is spent on destroying either sleeves or clothing that has already been removed.

The outfits range from ordinary street clothes to officewear, to just about anything else you can name, even three scenes with bridal gowns. A few scenes have two models who strip each other. The clothing looks expensive and looks great on these women. The models look very sophisticated and classy.

The videos have several constants. One is great looking models. Another is a high level of dirty talking directly at the camera and you the viewer that builds up suspense. With very sharp, but not HD video quality, I found watching these to be very addictive. Even when they do not go to full nude, I could not take my eyes off the screen.

This is a standalone site. You don't get any extras either. If you think this may be for you, I very definitely recommend givng the site a try.

12-29-10  06:40am

Replies (1)
Review
22
Visit Fantasy Female Fights

Fantasy Female Fights
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Unusual niche.
-Very attractive women for the most part.
-Sexy English accents.
-Nice quality videos. The most recent are 960x540, 4068 kbps. Not HD but sharp. Even the older videos are quite watchable.
Cons: -Some fake boobs and or tattoos.
-Poor acting, not very realistic fights.
-The dull photos don't do justice to the action. They are zipdownloadable, but only 960x1440.
Bottom Line: This is an unusual niche, so felt I had to cut it some slack regarding my score. Although there are a few other female fighting sites, few are any good.

In these videos we see British pornstars and nude models fight with each other. In many cases, they start off nude. In others there is a bit of clothing that comes off by the end of the fight. I liked these better.

The fighting is hesitant and definitely tentative. In only a few cases do these models really get into the spirit and show some real enthusiasm. Sometimes the action is so transparently not real that it would make a WWE wrestler blush-and that is not easy.

At about five minutes per video, I felt that they were long enough. Many of the videos were so similar that I thought that I had seen them before. Not true, its just that there isn't much variety in the plots.

The true plus here is the quality of the models. With cute English accents, they generally are quite pretty with bodies that make you forget about the negatives to the site.

My feeling is that the site is worthwhile if you enjoy topless,some full nudity, and almost no cases of lesbian sex. If you want more, Ultimate Surrender is a much better site.

12-22-10  08:52am

Replies (5)
Review
23
Visit Figure Baby

Figure Baby
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCbill, no regional pricing.
-Good value for the price.
-The big size downloads are sharp 2400x1600.
-Zipdownloadable photo sets.
-Real looking models, not glamour.
-Mostly ordinary looking clothing, some are the clothes the models arrived in.
-Most photo sets are a nice progression of clothed to full nude, many are spread at the end.
-Frequent updates.
-Nice mix of landscape and portrait photos.
Cons: -Videos are few and not erotic. Most have the models doing everyday things.
-Many, but not most, models have tattoos and/or piercings.
Bottom Line: Since so many others have reviewed this site, I will try not to repeat what they have said.

The site promises "a collection of beautiful women, artistic nude photography, and a spirit of fun. We update 3 times a week, so you're never bored. There's always something new to see."

"FigureBaby features the girl next door, or the woman who could be. Inside you'll find natural, everyday women, the same as you might see on the bus, at the mall, or in the park. Except here they're naked.

Never dull, FigureBaby is about simple fun. We emphasize a positive spirit, and a playful personality in all our photographs. If you're tired of average pictures and tired or bored looking models, your search is over. Come smile with the models of FigureBaby. And maybe even laugh."

Do they deliver what they promise? I believe they do.

The focus here is on real looking models that you won't find on every site. Some are nude art models, and the posing is interesting. As you would expect with amateur type models, a few were plain and some were outstanding. There was a wide variety of cup sizes from A to about C. There were two ethnic models, as one was Black and the other Asian. There was not much variation in age or body types though.


The site has a few kinds of photo sets. One kind seems to be professional as there is a colored background and the poses are pretty standard for that type. Some of these are overly artsy in that the explicit photos are few and in some sets there are none. The models hold a banana or an umbrella for example. Ok, but not my cup of tea.

Another kind they call "stolen moments". These appear to be solo masturbation scenes without toys, only fingers. Sounds erotic, but they are not, nor are they explicit.

Another kind is artsy black and white. I hated these. I know what I want to see and it certainly is not artistic b/w.

The best sets were the ones in various rooms inside a house. There was a progression from clothed to nude in nearly all cases, as some started off nude. The degree of explicitness I found satisfying, but the focus is most definitely on girl next door types taking off clothes you would see them wear in the street. These photo set types are the most common on the site, maybe about 2/3, and make the site worthwhile.

For the price this is a fine site. With three updates a week it is a bargain.

12-16-10  07:40am

Replies (2)
Review
24
Visit Public Flash

Public Flash
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Nice discount for joining through TBP.
-Nice balance of attractive models of all ethnicities, ages and body types.
-Constantly adding new clips. About an entire video per week.
-A very large archive at 205 videos.
-Some pornstars. Besides those that Rearadmirable recognized there is a great scene with one of my favorites, Laurie Vargas. She started in porn scenes three years before she appeared here and Amber Rayne one year before she appeared here. Neither has this sites videos listed in their video histories that I read about online.
Cons: -All videos come as clips only. There should be an option for downloading the entire video.
-Low quality non zipdownloadable photos.
-Many older videos are of such low quality that they are not worth downloading.
Bottom Line: Thanks to Rearadmiral's review I decided to go back to this site. His review is a very complete and accurate description, so I will try to avoid repeating what he said. I was last a member in August 2008. I liked the content, but the videos were not up to the quality I wanted. On an HD screen they were quite grainy.

Since March of 2010, the newest videos are shot in 1280x720, 4220kbps. Those are the specs for HD, but they aren't very sharp. There is a poll question on the site about an upgrade to 1920x1080. They have upgraded the older videos, but they could be much better.

What I really like here is the sense of fun on the site. The camera woman Kyndra, or Special K as she also calls herself, is unabashedly a lesbian and loves her work. She makes her models feel sexy by continuously complimenting them throughout the videos. Her style is much more that of a facilitator than of a director. She doesn't really tell the models what to do; she suggests in a way that makes them feel that they are daringly having naughty, exhilirating fun. They seem to get a natural high, a special thrill from showing off. The level of joking, smiling and laughing makes the site stand out from other flash sites. She makes them want to ever do more by continuously interacting with them. You get the feel that the two are having a conversation. The danger is that sometimes Kyndra is at the point of saying too much. A blabby camerawoman can get as dull as any blabby cameraman. However, she generally seems to say just enough to make the videos a hot experience for us viewers.

The videos range from flashing in secluded locations to opening up in front of total strangers who give their consent. Sometimes the models enter into work locations such as repair shops, stores , etc. The lighting there can be hit or miss. I feel that most of the best videos are shot outdoors. While there is a lot to be said about the daring spontaneous nature of the content, you also have some downsides. Lighting may prevent the viewer from getting details in closeups and sometimes the camerawork is a bit of a drawback. Kyndra is holding the camera in her hands, not a stationary tripod. The videos reflect her being unsteady, especially if she gets enthusiastic or nervous about getting caught. Flashing in public is illegal, as I am sure you know. . This leads to too much camera movement with not enough focus. Sometimes there is a lot of wasted video until a good location is found, so you may find yourself fast forwarding a bit.

As far as the photos, most are not at all related to the videos. As best as I can tell, none have been added since I was a member over two years ago and the lack of quality is evident. They are not zipdownloadable and come in at about 600x800.

My general impression is that the site is REAL reality television at its best. These videos surely beat the usual garbage that gets that title. At the TBP discounted price it definitely is worth a membership.

12-03-10  01:10pm

Replies (5)
Review
25
Visit India Uncovered

India Uncovered
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Part of large network of 22 sites and some streaming bonus sites. However, no other site in the network has a focus on any exotic women, let alone Indians.
-Recent videos are true HD at 1280x720, over 3000 kbps. Very sharp. Only 15 are HD, 29 are not. The low quality videos are barely watchable at all.
Cons: -No full movie download option, only clips.
-Photo sets are not zipdownloadable.
-Photos are decent at 1200x1600. Good quality, but many sites have better.
-Models are mostly only moderately attractive. They appear to be real amateurs.
-The site needs real growth. At the moment it is too small. I went through all the content in only a few hours.
-Updates at one clip per week, which comes to only about a scene and a half per month.
-Movie clips do not have unique file names.
Bottom Line: If there is a way to sum up this site, it is that it is real.

The models, both male and female are real Indians. There is no doubt about this when you see the content here. Not only that, they are recognizable as being from south India, where the people are darker. In some videos, they speak English with an Indian accent, but in most they speak in their native languages.

They appear to be real amateurs. Some are a bit plain, a few have great bodies and/or gorgeous faces. No way would you confuse these models with pornstars. The models are usually noticeably nervous in front of the camera. As you would expect with amateurs, it takes a while for the women to get into the scene. There is a lot of foreplay that seems genuine and unrehearsed. Sometimes there is some chemistry between the models and sometimes their natural shyness and discomfort comes across.

This type of materiel is rare. Indians find the whole idea of porn to be completely outside their culture. In India, you can get arrested for watching or possessing porn. Being in a video is unbelievably risky behavior both legally and socially. The best part is, it is in HD for the newer videos. Since there is so little genuine Indian material on the internet, this alone makes this site worth joining.

The videos have an appealingly genuine quality. The level of foreplay alone takes these videos to a place few websites can match in trying to be natural and unrehearsed. Real people, real sex.

The sex itself is not formulaic. Specifically, you don't get the same sequence of sex acts in every scene. However, you do see a lot of anal and oral. There are no creampies, but many shots where the guy comes on the woman's body. Reminds me of older porn movies. Also, there are no masturbation videos or lesbian ones.

Sometimes the videography could be better. They occasionally try some strange angles from underneath that simply do not work. However, mostly the focus is on the action, just where it belongs. It just isn't that slick, completely professional style that you see in gonzo flicks.

I found the site fun and interesting. I felt teased as I just wanted to see so many more videos. The photo sets were a nice plus and used the same models for both hardcore and softcore.

11-24-10  11:15am

Replies (2)

Shown : 1-25 of 187 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.38 seconds.