Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : messmer (137)  

Feedback:   All (2156)  |   Reviews (75)  |   Comments (238)  |   Replies (1843)

Other:   Replies Received (1284)  |   Trust Ratings (77)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 89 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit 21 Sextreme

21 Sextreme
(2)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 11-28-11  12:56pm  (Update History)
Reason: 28/11/2011: Downgraded by five points. Renewed membership is disappointing because so many sites still update in DVD quality and worse.
Pros: The dirty sister of 21Sextury with lots of contents even after it split off. Today (8th August) 21Sextreme lists 5120 scenes as well as 2032 models in total.

36 sites in total. 18 primary sites and 18 bonus sites.

Will appeal to the pervert in you with plenty of fetish material. This may not be to everyone's liking but they even list 7 Trannie sites as well as one gay site (highly unusual in most “straight” networks.) Not to forget my personal favorites, the “very” mature sites like “Lusty Grandmas,” I believe there are at least four sites like it which counts as a plus ... however, see below.

New picture sets are available zipped in regular size, as well as in Hi-Resolution at 1696x2544px, while the scenes are being offered in medium wmv and mp4, high wmv and mp4 (720x540 with a 3500 bitrate) as well as in two HD sizes, 1280x720p and 1920x1080p.

21Sextury and 21Sextreme excel when it comes to quality because even the non-HD scenes are quite watchable even in full screen.
Cons: While updates come regularly, an average of 11 updates a week is a bit meager for a network of 36 sites. This is because many of the sites stopped updating some time ago and others update only infrequently.

Our users should also be aware of the fact that not all updates are in HD because some of the sites, even though they are still active, have not yet switched to the higher grade material.

Especially galling for me is the fact that only one mature site updates on a weekly basis while the others are slumbering, awaiting a wake up call by the site owners. You might find that this is also the case in connection with your favorite niche!
Bottom Line: All in all I like this “darker” sister of 21Sextury a lot. I never did visit the individual model sites as well as the more “glamorous” teenie sites all that often in the olden days, so, to me, the fact that they split into two has actually encouraged me to concentrate on the rest of the 21Sextremes contents more closely and I like what I see.

For the fan of the unusual, this fetish site will be quite satisfying. For a low price you will get a satisfying share of lesbians, trannies, grannies, granddads and BDSM and some other kinky stuff, with even a gay site thrown into the mix, and the technical quality of the more recent material is great.

28/11/2011: Took out a new subscription and noticed how many of the prime sites are still updating in an outdated format. Today's update was marked HD but the quality is far from HD like. This update does not even look like DVD quality as it is blurry when viewed in full window. This is the case with many updates that are not marked Super HD. So, high quality updates are fewer and farther between than I thought when I first wrote this review. Downgraded by five points.

08-08-11  04:15pm

Replies (5)
Review
2
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(11)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Updated: 01-02-11  11:33am  (Update History)
Reason: Too many errors that take too long to be corrected in updates. Tech support too hard to reach!
Pros: 45 Sites, many catering to lovers of glamorous Eastern European models. Available right away to long term subscribers.

Excellent quality in pictures and videos. HD in different formats available for download.

No DRM

No Download limit.

Excellent download speed for me (3.5 MB/s) when downloading single files. Good download speed when downloading more than one.

Good search engine.

Good price, reducing as you go along. I subscribed long term and got a really good deal.
Cons: New updates are often buggy.

Many dead or dormant sites. I counted about 17 if my memory serves me right.

Sites with more extreme content have been tamed down.
Bottom Line: I tell you, this is the most objective score I have ever given because the vast majority of the content does not appeal to me because my niches are the unusual, the more extreme, ladies at an age that would be considered by most "over the hill," anything that is as far removed from glamor as one can get, yet most sites of this network cater exactly to the glamor part while many of my sites have been allowed to bite the dust.

Usually one's personal prejudices will creep in, knowingly or not, but this time I am attempting to speak for the vast majority (putting myself in their shoes for once) when I say that this site deserves a 90, up from the 80 I gave it previously, since they finally gave their long term subscribers five of their new sites.

A 90 is also well-deserved because most models and scenes and sites that still update regularly will be a delight to connoisseurs of feminine beauty and the excellent quality is certainly there .. so, while I keep looking for my unusual and most likely unappealing sites to most, I will highly recommend this one to the large majority of porn lovers who have better taste than mine and who will happily find a home here.

10-29-10  11:28am

Replies (4)
Review
3
Visit 40 Something Mag

40 Something Mag
(0)

62.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Large and exclusive amount of content.

Mostly attractive models.

Good picture quality ... however ...
Cons: ... let me start with the biggest con. Pictures should be their strength. That's what the magazine is all about however they manage to ruin every single set (latest ones zipped and around 1600px) with an oversized, intrusive, aggravating watermark that's been placed in the wrong spot. So for many collectors pictures are out.

As to the videos, they are woeful, with the newest ones in 640x360 wmv format with a total bitrate between 1500 and 2500. Older ones are even tinier in 320x240 mpg format. I had to get my info re. the latter by taking a peak at TBPs review because, as the previous reviewer stated, my browser crashed every time I attempted to download an older video.

Homepage is hopelessly cluttered with sales offers and other extraneous material. Preview pictures of recent updates are ridiculously tiny.

Way too much hardcore material. This might be a plus for some but with the material coming from a magazine this disappointed me, personally.
Bottom Line: I didn't check my personal statistics but this must be the lowest rating I've ever given anyone.

I see no redeeming value in this site because between picture sets that are being ruined by the watermark, and videos that are only available in yesterday's outdated quality, plus the browser crashes, as well as the crass and obvious attempts to make some extra sales to their members there's absolutely nothing for me here.

I had always had my quarrels with these folks about the watermarks (see my previous comments) but was tempted to subscribe because sister sites 50plus MILF and 60plus MILF finally gave me some lingerie I liked and I was hoping for the same here, at least in the videos.

A bitter disappointment and waste of my money.

11-06-10  10:33am

Replies (6)
Review
4
Visit 50Plus MILFs

50Plus MILFs
(1)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: True to the niche. All models are over fifty and most are quite attractive to those of us who like mature women. Models seem to be genuinely enjoying themselves.

Videos available for streaming and download at HD quality at both 720p and 1280p

Excellent streaming at 720p.

Downloads were generally quick for me.

Photo sets come in medium and large sizes, zipped. Large is usually around 1500 px but fluctuates, even within the sets.
Cons: Picture sets are relatively small, 35 - 50 pictures per set in the ones I tested. As in its sister site 40somethingmagazine the watermarks are too garish and huge and tend to spoil the picture.

Watermarks are also quite prominent in the videos but because they take up less of the screen they are easier on the eye.

Download speed was erratic. Some videos downloaded at 1.8 MB/s (single download through DTA) while others barely reached 600 KB/s.

Only one download at a time when using DTA through Firefox. Much slower speed when using regular Browser downloader.

Still a relatively small site with 49 models.

Videos and Picture sets only update once a week, which might not be a bad thing since attractive 50+ models are few and far between and the chance is always there that the quality gets watered down.

Navigation is simple but nevertheless takes a bit of getting used to.
Bottom Line: I love this site and it would have rated well in the nineties if it hadn't been for those accursed big watermarks and the fact that it is still a relatively small site.

The quality of the videos and pictures is excellent. The ladies are confident and at ease with their bodies and sexuality and appear to be having fun at the shoots. I especially enjoy the interviews because it makes the scenes the models appear in later on more "intimate" for some reason.

I would highly recommend this site, for a month, to lovers of truly older women.

07-06-10  11:38am

Replies (12)
Review
5
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(1)

95.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 08-21-11  04:03pm  (Update History)
Reason: Split movies in g/g section plus .. see below!
Pros: 1384 beautiful, natural models.

Latest movies are available in Lo, Regular, High and HD. High is very good at 1024x576p while HD is at 1280x720p and also very nice and crisp.

Pictures are available in two sizes, 3888x2592px and 1470x980px, zipped. The sets are huge but for those who think less is more there are also “the best of” reduced sets available of the same models.

I love the fact that so many pictures and videos are heavily tagged, it really encourages one to browse and I've come across some incredible material via the tag method already.

Homepage layout is a joy, even giving one a preview of what's to come for the whole month ahead complete with samples.

Download Manager friendly, plus ample bandwidth given to the user. I downloaded 5 videos at a time and was still able to move freely around the site and even watch smooth streaming while downloading.

Download speed for me was over my max at 2.3 MB/s, either for one file or for the five combined.
Cons: I am looking hard for one! Oh, yes, b/g content .. I hate it. Will be a plus for others so will not count against the site.. In any case there is not THAT much of it, so I'll find it easy to avoid it.

I'm also not particularly keen about the “rump” shots found in many of the picture sets. I would prefer to see more of the model than just a picture of hip down to top of upper thighs.

When considering the first 100 I ever gave a site please be kind and remember that TBP states that site "could do little to improve" and I agree with that wholeheartedly.
Bottom Line: I know that a lot of us were discontent and disappointed a while ago because many movies took too long to get to the point, but I don't find this to be the case this time around.

All the videos I have looked at so far take me back to my first subscription, and to the awe and delight I felt in connection with this site. Except that this time around the videos are in one piece and in HD and the picture sets are awesome in their Ultra High Resolution size.

AW appear to keep improving with age and don't look (judging by the updates) as if they have any intention of slowing down in the foreseeable future.

The girls look and act so incredibly natural and appear to enjoy themselves so much that I am almost reluctant to describe this site as a porn site even though it was given an award by AVN.

It was my favorite site then and is in danger of quickly becoming so again.

What happened to my love of older women and fine lingerie, you may ask?

Well, this site is so enchanting that I don't find it hard at all to forgive them the lack of the above mentioned, and give AW the highest mark I've ever given anyone.

No glamour, no excessive make up, no porn star mannerisms here, just young women of all stripes and sizes who are highly erotic to me because of the fact that everything they do seems so unstaged and natural.

If the discount through TBP is still valid I would strongly recommend the “three pack” of Abby Winters to all of our users who prefer wholesome and natural.

August 21, 2011: Have reduced my score of 100 by five points because,

a) as I found out in the meantime, not all movies are in one part. In the girl-girl section they are still as a rule in four parts: "before, part 1, part 2, after." I would like for at least the main action to be in one part only. Before and after I can do without.

b) this past week's updates were exceptionally bad, in MY eyes I agree, but that's the only way I can judge a site.

Because of these two factors I have reduced my score slightly from 100 to 95.

07-26-11  06:34pm

Replies (20)
Review
6
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(1)

80.0
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Large archive of beautiful "next door" kind of models.

Picture sets are technically excellent and come in zipped format. Videos have improved quite a bit from the last time I wrote a review, and they were good even then, but still fall short of those of the new, more up-to-date HD format carrying sites.

True to its niche.

Excellent download speed.
Cons: The biggest con is that this site was split up into three different ones. I got a special returning members rate for all three but, to me, it is still unfathomable why they would do that.

For instance, there will never be any long term subscribers to their g/g site because updates are so slow in coming, so this move does not seem very wise.

As others have pointed out, both photo sets and videos have become boring because the "tease factor" (according to the webmaster) is being stretched out too much. Maybe they really toned things down in anticipation of the coming raid?

When it comes to the photo sets, I hate those shots of one breast, or part of a hip etc. I don't see the reason for them. Show the whole model in landscape now and then and give us some pink!

My personal beef (not influencing the score) is that when it comes to underwear, cotton and wool appear to triumph. It would be so nice to see something glistening and silky under those jeans and sweaters once in a while.
Bottom Line: For those who yearn for technical details, my apologies, two months plus after having been a returning member I cannot remember them (except that they had switched to a crisper mp4 format for their latest videos) and I have nothing on my hard drive to go by because, of all the downloads from all three sites, nothing was kept. Regrettable for an ex-favorite.

Which will definitely explain why I lowered the score from my original review (90) to a more realistic (for these times) 80.

My favorite site of natural girls being slightly naughty has become a ho-hum triple site of natural girls being coy.

The technical quality is still there, the large archive is still there, the girls are still pretty so, for those who like their porn very soft, it would still be a pretty fair site .. if only they hadn't split it up. I really couldn't recommend a single site of theirs for the price they ask for.

P.S. Two months or so later: For honesty's sake, I did come across some g/g and IM video clips I had kept recently so I take back what I said above about having deleted everything. But sadly what I had kept was still slim pickings from a triple site and does not affect the score.

07-22-09  01:15pm

Replies (2)
Review
7
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(1)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A great selection of amateur models, refreshing in their lack of self-consciousness. One gets the feeling that they are girls-next-door who enjoy getting naughty at times. Selection of models is excellent, girls are attractive. The quality of the pictures and movies is outstanding. One special plus is the sensitivity to the models' feelings by the videographers.
Cons: I wrote in my remarks that I would keep resubscribing but changed my opinion after a few months. There may be a variety in models but there is not much variety in what they do. I commend the webmaster for sticking to her guns. This is her site, this is the way she likes it .. and good on her, but without adding some categories (older, lingerie etc.) I'm afraid it is going to be a one time subscription site for many of us.
Bottom Line: A wonderful site, very well done and well worth a one time subscription. It definitely rates a 90 or even a few points higher but AW might want to consider doing things a bit different now and then, just to keep us resubscribing.

11-07-07  09:44am

Replies (0)
Review
8
Visit Action Matures

Action Matures
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 268 videos, many in 1280x720p HD 3000 bitrate, wmv format.

Older Videos at 640x480p 2000 bitrate, wmv or avi are not bad considering the advances made in quality over the years.

Many mature ladies, some for every taste, but don't expect glamor.

All contents are hardcore which is a plus for many.
Cons: The typical Ferro minimalism. No search engine, no model base, no scene description.

Lack of co-ordination between the various sites. I just received this one as a bonus and once again had to feed it my awkward generated user name and password. Other sites manage to make navigation between their sites easier, why can't Ferro.

The very strong feeling that the network is on cruise control without anyone at the helm. Last update to this site was in October 2011. It looks as if they have given up and just collect money now for what they have accumulated over the years.

Only one download at a time possible. Attempts to download a second one at the same time will fail.

The same HUGE watermarks as in their other sites. This is especially noticeable in the 640x480p videos with their smaller windows.

No pictures.
Bottom Line: This site might be worth a subscription to you if you like hardcore and reasonably mature women.

The picture quality in most videos is excellent, only spoiled for me by those accursed large watermarks on top and bottom. If you don't mind those then there is enough of what looks to be exclusive material to keep you happy for a while ... especially since one monthly subscription brings four bonus sites with it.

Just be warned that Ferro must be getting ready to leave a sinking ship, judging by the rarity of updates in all sites I have looked at so far, as well as deafening silence when it comes to support.

I won't be back but Ferro might strike a chord with you, so I'll give it a 75. Not great, but tolerable.

01-30-12  02:12pm

Replies (8)
Review
9
Visit Adult Doorway

Adult Doorway
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A Gateway to a network of 21 sites plus various bonus material. All can be reached without needing to repeat one's password or user name.

True to its niche, at least in its flag ship sites for containing the most extreme porn on the net: Facial Abuse, Latina Abuse, Ghetto Gaggers etc. should give you a good idea of what it's all about.

Video quality and picture quality in the approx. 8 first class sites of the network are outstanding with HD being the norm in the most recent updates. One even has the choice of two different HD formats, 1280x720 and 1920x1080. Both give a crystal clear picture.

Picture sets are huge, mainly screen captures but once again of outstanding quality. The usual size is 1440x960. All can be downloaded zipped.

Download speed was generally good for me.
Cons: Updates are slow.

The secondary sites diminish the value of the net. Most contain mpeg videos that were tiny even two years ago and are not worth watching in full screen. Many of the videos on those sites are still in segments that have to be downloaded separately.

On the primary sites the quality is excellent but things get boring very quickly because (in Facial Abuse, for instance) the girls all sit on the same couch, with the same backdrop, doing the same thing video after video. Very little imagination is shown by the "abuser."
Bottom Line: I subscribed to this network of sites because I was enthralled with the high end HD quality of the videos and was willing to put up with some personal wincing and soul searching when it came to watching the rougher stuff, consoling myself with the fact that the abuse was by mutual consent.

And, just so I won't appear to be a hypocrite, I'll tell you in all honesty that my darker side also drew me to the material like a magnet because I hadn't gone the "rough" way before, except for once when I stumbled across similar stuff on Videobox, but I must say that I badly need the cleansing experience of soft porn after this. :-) This is a purely personal thing so don't take it as a put-down of the site or of your personal taste.

I would recommend the top sites in this network of twenty-one sites to those who like their porn rough and extreme. The price is certainly right, plus there are some "milder" sites as well ( eg. POV Hotel), and even though the updates are slow in coming you will find enough to keep you happily occupied for a month.

As to the secondary sites, forget about them. You'll find out soon enough which are which.

Even though extreme porn is not exactly my niche of choice I would have given "Adult Doorway" an 80, possibly an 85 if the "fleshing out" of the network hadn't been done with such inferior material. Always makes me feel cheated, somehow, even if the good stuff makes up for it.

07-14-09  07:46pm

Replies (0)
Review
10
Visit Adult Movie Club

Adult Movie Club
(0)

69.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Choice of approximately 2000 DVDs. Many of the newer ones are of excellent quality.

Upgrades are regular with three new DVDs added daily.

DVDs/Sections are in wmv format, often with the choice of picking three levels of quality for download.

Flash streaming to preview a scene before you download it and find out after that you don't like it.

I even saw some buttons for ipod downloads.
Cons: As I am beginning to discover, many of the older DVDs are of mediocre quality. This makes it lose the edge I had given it over Video Box. There are problems with streaming "Flash," some links work, others don't and most of the most recent DVDs and scenes do not seem to give you the option to preview by streaming. This will be corrected eventually, of course, but in the meantime you have to download to see what you are getting.

Navigation within the site is sticky but my main beef with the site is *consistently* bad download speed! It's so bad that it knocked my review down by ten points.

I must have been lucky the first few downloads because everything I got today was blurry and you definitely needed to know German. Of course, I was moving around in the "mature" niche and that seems to be more of a European preference than a North American one, so quality material might be hard to find since most DVDs are made in the US.
Bottom Line: Now to the bottom line:

Not a bad site, not a great site. If you look for something you didn't see on Video Box you might find it here, however I feel that with the flaws I found after only three days, this site is not quite ready for prime time.

Added: June 28, 2008, see comment "Not Ready For Prime Time!" to get some more details about why it might be wise to wait a while with subscribing. I had originally recommended this site wholeheartedly for a one month subscription but would no longer do so. Original rating has also been dropped to 75 in view of my negative experiences.

Added on July 14, 2008: I've come to the point where I am giving up on this site. This morning the speed was even more horrendously slow than usual, even within the site, and I am still waiting for an answer in connection with my complaints about the lousy speed more than a week after I wrote the emails. This is unacceptable and together with too many streaming links that still don't work (or work stop and go because of the speed) drop AMC below 70.

06-26-08  03:40pm

Replies (0)
Review
11
Visit All Over 30

All Over 30
(1)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Mostly very good looking models from thirty to fifty years of age.

Very well organized site with a good search engine.

Various niches to please most tastes.

Six weekly updates containing picture sets and videos.

Pictures are of very good quality, especially at
1536X1024 resolution. And they are in zip format for an easy download.

Speed has been excellent for me at approx. 1.1 MB/s.
Cons: Videos are inexcusably bad for 2008.

Some of the photographers should be given the pink slip because their sets are either lacking lighting or are not sharp enough, or in the case of one photographer always seem to have a pinkish tinge rather than the natural skin tones one expects.

I also find that way too many sets contain toys (a plus for others) while there are too few sets with truly mature women over fifty which limits my choice of downloads considerably.

I rejoice over some of the truly excellent sets of pictures I have found on this site but am already at a point where I only look in to see if the daily update contains anything that might interest me. Most days it doesn't. Reading some of the other reviews my "cons" might very well be someone else's pros, that's why, in order to be fair, I gave the site a "Very Good."

My rating would shoot up dramatically if the site contained less "toys" and more "lacy" sets, as well as a huge improvement when it comes to videos.
Bottom Line: AllOver30 is a quality site that I would recommend to all those who are tired of the cuteness and sameness of teenies.

I would join just as a thank you to those who feel that anyone over twenty is still worthwhile looking at, but at the same time I bemoan the fact that they don't cater more, through a set or two a week, to those of us who think a woman over fifty can still be exciting and beautiful.

I think that is a category that is being sadly neglected in most sites, it would certainly fit perfectly in a site like AO30.

10-07-08  02:27pm

Replies (2)
Review
12
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(3)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 04-28-11  03:10pm  (Update History)
Reason: The longer I am a member of this site the more I appreciate its qualities. Raising score by Two (2).
Pros: A large selection of very beautiful models from Europe and North America.

Impressive photography, mostly solo or g/g. Available in approx. 930x1400 px, Normal Resolution and 2200x3500 px High Resolution, zipped. Slight changes in resolution from picture to picture. Enormously large sets giving you the choice of keeping only the very best.

Most recent videos are in HD format in 720p dvx and mp4 format, as well as the extra large videos at 1080p wmv. All are downloadable!

Streaming is also available for previews or watching the whole video on-line if you so desire. Streaming picture is HD and very clear as well. I experienced no buffering problems.

Speed of download was also very good for me at 3.5 MB/s. This was for a single file through Firefox's DTA. Normal downloads through the browser downloader were much slower but still around 600 KB/s but as a plus this way of doing things seemed to allow multiple downloads.

Nice bonus material (auditions, blogs, bts etc.)
Cons: Huge picture sets will require a large amount of time to prune. I never thought I would consider a set containing approx. 300 pictures a con. Well, it isn't really - see above under pros, but some of you might be a bit more impatient when it comes to downloading or editing a 500 MB picture set so be warned.

I desperately want a search engine for this site. You practically have to go from update (arranged in chronological order) to update to find something that fits your taste.

Model directory is in alphabetical order but it would be nice if the pictures of the models contained the dates when her sets and videos were published. This would prevent the frustration of finding a beautiful model and then realize that her pictures are not High Resolution and her videos are split up into various parts .. something most of us aren't interested in nowadays unless we collect the complete works of a model.

Continued below:
Bottom Line: It would be nice to be able to go to a point where publishing HD videos and HR pictures first started and work one's way up to the present from there.

Close attention is required when looking at the updates themselves, some are an invitation to rate sets, some are bonus material from other sites, some are masturbation videos or g/g videos, some are picture sets, but there are also videos of photoshoots .. something I dislike heartily, but others might enjoy.

Because I didn't pay attention originally I downloaded a hefty HD file (g/g content) expecting hot action and found myself listening to the distracting remarks of the director as he gave his instructions for the shoot. I don't like to have my illusions destroyed. But, as I said, some might like that sort of thing.

BOTTOM LINE:

This is a well-respected, well run site that offers top quality material. I did not see one single unattractive model, I'd even take the ones they had to reject during their auditions. Most would be between 18-25 in age.

The material is shot indoors, as well as in more exotic locations. Lovers of glamorous videos and picture sets will be well pleased.

There is also the added eroticism of a bit of kink. Fisting, insertion of large objects (mostly dildos), peeing, some public exposure scenes. Good stuff for most.

I also loved the fact that I did not come across one single pair of enhanced breasts. They MIGHT be there but I didn't come across them. This is so refreshing when compared to most sites!

I am adding my usual plaint, and yes, all of you who know me knew it would come:

I wish they featured some mature women, and I wish that their models would wear more than the bare necessities. Sometimes the girls don't even wear those, because I very seldom came across a bra or even a pair of panties during many of my spot checks of the picture sets and videos, but then I shouldn't go to a site like this one and expect it to be something it wasn't meant to be.

You can't expect to find cougars in a cubs' playpen.

After all this site is not meant for lovers of a leisurely strip by mature women but for those who revel in beautiful young, glistening bodies, and for them ALS SCAN does its job very well.

04-24-11  09:55am

Replies (26)
Review
13
Visit Amateur Hi Def

Amateur Hi Def
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 12-06-09  12:00pm  (Update History)
Reason: Entirely too many old clips being offered as updates. There's less to this site than first meets the eye.
Pros: + Approx. 160 Models

+ Approx. 500 clips all in HD at 1280x720,
bitrate varies from 3000 to 6000.

+ Downloads are available as wmv, h264 mp4, and
ipod files.

+ Streaming is of excellent quality.

+ Picture sets are zipped. Pictures of my test
set were HR at 1152 x 1728 pixels.
Cons: - Clips vary dramatically in size. Some are as short as 2.5 minutes, others as long as 30 minutes. The majority are between 3 minutes and 5 minutes long.

- Empty links. Model and scene are shown but there is no content to be found.

- Some content was shown as an update even though it had already been offered at an earlier time.

- Confusion when it comes to spelling a model's name (Faye Regan, Fay Reagan etc.).

- Awkward naming of files.

- Picture sets, despite being nice and crisp are mostly boring. Many are very softcore and don't even offer full nudity. This applies to many video clips as well.
Bottom Line: I like this site. I like the fact that I can get all the clips in High Definition. HD is not quite as good as that found in ITC or FTV but is of a very pleasing quality just the same.

However be warned that there is a lot of softcore being offered in the shorter clips, eg. sometimes the models will perform a lap dance without taking anything off etc. etc.

They are all cute, though. I didn't find a single ugly model in the bunch. I subscribed for three months at $ 25.00 and certainly feel at this moment that I will get my money's worth. The special one month price offered to PU is also a bargain in my eyes.

Changed on 12-28-09 to "Low recommendation" because of the, for me, fatal flaw mentioned above. To me it is cheating if someone keeps juggling the inventory and one never knows if one gets an update or something one downloaded earlier on. This site becomes very unexciting after a while because once one picks the clips one likes there is nothing much new from week to week. I stated above that I liked the site but the longer I am a member the less pleasure I get out of visiting it.

So be guided accordingly!

11-05-09  01:31pm

Replies (0)
Review
14
Visit Amazing Grannies

Amazing Grannies
(0)

50.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of pictures

Allows search by ethnic groups, sexual activities (Hardcore, Lesbians, Solo), amateur etc.
Cons: I won't dignify this site with a long review because I took two looks, downloaded some samples from each site on the "network" and decided never to go back.

Amazing Grannies offered some potentially nice pictures but they cannot be zipped. None of the models featured on their tour could be found. Most are much younger than "Grannies."

Videos were so so in quality. The bonus sites "Hairy Pussy Cuties,"Vintage Cuties," "Home Made Junk" were horribly outdated. In Hairy Pussy Cuties, as one example, there is also the effort to deceive the customer: five updates are listed as having been added on November 29, 2010 but those updates all consist of pictures with dimensions 800x600 and lead me to assume that the sets are old and have just been given a new date to make it look as if the site is still active. The site news had its last entry in 2006!! Vintage Cuties is of horrendous quality. I realize these sets are old but there is always Photoshop to bring the best out of vintage pictures.
Bottom Line: All four are utter garbage sites. Amazing Grannies as a stand alone site might get a sixty from me if the picture sets could be zipped but I am not in the mood to download pictures one by one even if the set only contains about 30 pictures. Email to support re. zips only brought deafening silence.

Oh, yeah, almost forgot to mention, communication between the various sites is slower than cold molasses. Downloads from every site but Amazing Grannies was around 70 KB/s.

Avoid like the plague. This is another case where I wish I could give my subscription away to someone else because, after only two days, I ain't goin' back!

Minor addition:

One other thing I forgot to mention, they gave me a choice of billers. Both CCBill and Epoch are listed as alternates but no longer do business with this site because I was kicked over to Segpay when I tried to pay through either! That tells the whole story right there!

12-03-10  10:43am

Replies (4)
Review
15
Visit American Vice

American Vice
(0)

97.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Excellent video site that caters to most tastes, a rarity among its peers who tend to be so main stream that they become boring very quickly.

Three different degrees of quality when it comes to downloads. The best quality video (WMV) has a bitrate of 2000 and is quite acceptable, especially since the huge HD files of other sites have eaten up a lot of my hard drive space.

A superb search engine even though a novice frequently gets a message that whatever he is looking for can not be found. With a bit of experience these messages get fewer and fewer and you really are able to zero in on what appeals to you most.

The most responsive and friendly webmaster I have come across so far in a porn site.

Excellent download speeds (1.4 - 1.7 MB/s) for me on single downloads. With multiple downloads speed goes down accordingly but is still quite respectable.

Almost forgot to mention: I love the editorial comments and find them not only funny but quite helpful.
Cons: Only one con but I am not sure if that is a personal or site problem: I am not able to stream a scene with Firefox. I have tried everything, even using the IE plug-in, but that invariably takes me to the join page and asks for my user name and password. I am using "sample" to get an idea of what a scene is all about but usually don't get much information through the short clip shown. Wish they switched to Flash.
Bottom Line: This is a site I am really enthused about.

Subscriptions to other video sites usually start out with a WOW and next day are followed by IS THIS ALL THERE IS, but the niches are so well represented in this site that I keep finding excellent videos left and right that I've never seen before and the WOW factor has been extended.

As someone stated, this site could stand heftier updates to keep up with the competition, but on the other hand, if the webmaster keeps throwing us bones in the form of different and unusual contents I shall remain a loyal supporter.

In one sentence: Highly recommended and, to me, this is the best video site around, beating its bigger peers hands down when it comes to entertainment value and value for the buck.

02-24-09  02:47pm

Replies (2)
Review
16
Visit Anilos

Anilos
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Mostly very good looking mature women.

+Video quality is excellent.

+Picture quality is excellent. Most sets can be downloaded in normal and large. All are zipped.

+Navigation is excellent.

+Download speed has been consistent around 1.7 MB/s.

+Regular updates.
Cons: Not enough of a choice of models just yet. A new site can not be faulted for that so this did not affect the score.

Most of the models are between thirty and forty, a few more over forty would lend a welcome "balance" to the site, that, plus the fact that they allowed women with fake breasts with visible scars to sneak into another wise great line-up of models, kept my score in the mid eighties.

Not enough pubic hair (my personal preference, again not counted against the site as most Porn Users prefer the shaved look).
Bottom Line: I believe this will be a great site once it expands a bit more.

I downloaded all the great ones (according to my taste) like Berkley, Dee Dee, Fallon and Calliste yesterday and was so pleased with the videos and picture sets that I feel I already got full value for my money and the rest will be gravy, especially if there should be (hopefully) an update for one or all of the above mentioned models during the remaining period of my subscription.

My suggestion would be, if you're not greedy but go for the best in a site: take the tour, see if you can find at least three, four models that appeal to you. If you can, subscribe, download them and consider it good value for your money.

That's how good the quality of Anilos' material is!

After my subscription is up I'll certainly make it a point to make regular visits to the site to see how it is coming along.

03-18-09  09:56am

Replies (8)
Review
17
Visit Art-Lingerie

Art-Lingerie
(2)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This site has maintained its emphasis on beauty since my last review. Not one bad looking model to be found.

Videos can be downloaded at 720p and lower. 720p would be my preferred size as the picture is good (albeit not as crisp as I would like it) and the file size is relatively small.

Picture sizes available in three resolutions. This review will have to be a one pointer because I have not downloaded one single set so far, therefore I cannot quote any picture dimensions.

Downloads have been at my top speed.

Daily updates. Usually two - three picture sets in a row, then a video.

If you are near the end of your subscription it might be worth your while to look at the coming updates because you can get five freebies (fast tracks) of material that has not yet been published, A very nice and generous touch.

Very nice, user friendly, lay out. Models and outfits can be rated, comments are possible and are not censored, to my knowledge.
Cons: It could be such a terrific site if only they put away the air brush, body make-up and photoshop for good and went with natural! For an ultra high resolution fan this can be so aggravating. I look at the models' faces and bodies, and all the small imperfections that make them the persons they are have been carefully removed until they look like someone from Madame Tussauds' Wax Museum. One can admire them but they are not erotic.
Bottom Line: Because the choice of lingerie sites is so limited I subscribe to Art-Lingerie now and then. I am limiting myself to the download of videos to escape the "improvements" in the picture sets, even though I am a collector of both.

To those who like the Only Tease, Only Satin etc. sites (and their picture sets) this site is highly recommended. You will find some more of the same, except there's more nudity here, but with none of the raunchiness found on other, similar sites. You will also find the same, user friendly home page and search engine as in the "Only ... " sites.

To the 58% who, like me, are craving something more crisp, more natural in their picture sets and more natural coloring (a bit too warm for my taste) in their videos, I would recommend waiting for a while before subscribing, just to see if the webmaster will give serious consideration to their preferences.

Until the unnatural softness and coloration of the pictures is fixed I can give this site no more than a 75.

07-22-12  05:47pm

Replies (22)
Review
18
Visit Art-Lingerie

Art-Lingerie
(2)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 05-17-11  11:07am  (Update History)
Reason: Since this is primarily a picture site the consistent blurriness (softness) of the HR pictures forces me to downgrade my original score.
Pros: Beautiful models. Some of them very well known and sought after.

Good selection of picture sets and videos.

Pictures come in three different sizes with the biggest ones weighing in at 3000x2000. Typical set is rather small though.

Videos come in two sizes: a smaller one at 640x360p, but very crisp, and an HD one at 1280x720p.

Both sizes are very nice when it comes to clarity of the picture. Videos vary in length. Some can be as short as 3-5 minutes or as long as 11 minutes. There might be longer ones but I haven't come across them. On the other hand, if you have a solo model slowly divesting herself of her lingerie you don't really need a 30 minute video.

Pictures and Videos are downloadable with no restrictions!

Daily Updates alternating between picture and video.
Cons: The naming is horrible. A combination of numbers and letters plus the size you downloaded, that's about it. (eg. 2180-zzD-Ultra.zip) It forces you to stop and rename each and every file when it has finished downloading so that you will remember the name of the model inside the zip.

I am a picture person at heart but was disappointed with the quality of the High Resolution pictures at 3000x2000. They almost reminded me of Twisty's or Only Tease. Too much body make-up, too much air brushing, too much photo shop? Picture became way too soft because of the way it was treated.

It's presented in a size where one should be able to count every pore and hair and fold of garment on a model but in my sample sets I couldn't.

Focus was in the wrong place at times as well. But I guess that's where the "art" comes in.

I had very slow speeds when using DTA and was surprised to find that I was doing better with my ordinary Firefox downloader .. but even then I barely managed more than 500-600KB/s
Bottom Line: A very nice, user friendly site for lovers of erotic lingerie. It has the same basic lay-out as Only Tease and if you've ever been a member of that site you will know that it has to be excellent.

I liked the idea that in some sets and videos the model started out with more than just bra, panties, garter belt and stockings (sadly many of them ARE like that) but would have liked them to finish fully nude.

They don't hide anything, as opposed to OT, but be warned the site is very softcore! Don't expect spreading or masturbation or insertions, you won't find it here.

The models are very appealing to me despite their youth. I guess that touch of fine lingerie helps. Too bad about the pictures, though. I will restrict myself to downloading videos until someone decides to do away with all that powder and sharpens the pictures a bit.

It is my opinion that they built themselves a very nice site here with lots of content considering they are only a couple of years old and I would recommend it to lingerie lovers, if for nothing else than the HD videos that can be found right from their beginning in 2009. I would even recommend it to picture lovers if they don't mind that soft look!

If they renamed their zip files to something more practical like "Eufrat01HR.zip" for instance I would happily give them a higher rating because the models and lingerie are truly stunning, but the present way of naming files is annoying me no end.

04-25-11  04:05pm

Replies (2)
Review
19
Visit AT Kingdom

AT Kingdom
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Huge selection of attractive young women.

Nice sub-divisions into categories like lingerie, pregnant, Co-ed, upskirt etc.

Fair to good download speed.
Cons: Huge selection of attractive young women ... who all look too glamorous to be amateurs. Most who would be tempted to subscribe to an "Amateur Kingdom" would do so in order to download pictures of "girls next door." The models' wardrobe is plain enough to qualify (denim lovers rejoice) but the faces belong on a glamor site.

The different categories are not always accurate. Being a lingerie fan I found very little true "lingerie" contents, most I came across so far were sets of models who had their panties on to start out with.

Under "upskirt" I found many sets of pictures that didn't really represent what's usually understood under the term. Sets of models sprawled on beds and sofas being photographed from the foot of said pieces of furniture may be technically upskirt but not for the afficionado of the genre.

Customer service "specialist" acted very defensively when I expressed disappointment with the site and enquired if it would be possible to switch me to "Natural and Hairy."
Bottom Line: Frankly, the site is a great disappointment because I had such a positive experience with ATK Natural and Hairy. I gave that site an 89 in my review while this one ends up with a far lower score. Mildly recommended to anyone 18 - 25 years old, not recommended for those who look for natural or for diversity or who are over thirty.

May 13 Update: The longer I am with this site the more I get irritated by the cookie cutter quality of the picture sets. There is a monotonous sameness to the way the models pose and to the way they are dressed, it seems that only the faces change. I am reducing my rating to 75. Probably to a storm of protest because ATK is usually a quality product but this site isn't. At least not in my eyes.

04-21-08  12:55pm

Replies (0)
Review
20
Visit ATK Exotics

ATK Exotics
(1)

82.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A large selection of attractive, exotic models.

Nice and crisp photography.

Fair to good HD videos (depending on photographer).

Huge daily updates (5 picture sets Monday-Friday, 1 retro picture set on Saturday, 10 movies on Sundays)

Excellent download speeds for me.

Very attractive home page.
Cons: Be warned, I decided to be very subjective, most ATK Exotics subscribers may vehemently disagree:

There is a deadly sameness to most picture sets even though the skin color varies. See bottom line.

I would prefer to have video updates on a daily basis rather than having to wait one week for the next update. I think a change there would be very important to those of us whose taste changed from collecting pictures to videos.

Saturday's update is dedicated to picture sets from their archives. Last week they were all dated 2005. This might be a plus for some and would be for me if they were in today's high resolution.

I still don't understand this “volume” business after many subscriptions to ATK's sites.

An email sent to support over five days ago never brought an acknowledgment.
Bottom Line: I really thought I was done with mixed picture/video sites, especially those whose emphasis is heavily on pictures, but a very attractive email offer showed up and I couldn't resist, figuring that a site with such a vast amount of material would have some sets that would re-ignite my interest in pictures.

In vain!

There are some sets where the model wears a pretty nightie or other lingerie (mostly cotton panties) but those sets are exceedingly rare and when you do run across them chances are the model divests herself of same nightie or lingerie within the first ten pictures.

What this site amounts to is a heap of nice, fresh, good looking young ladies of all ethnic stripes wearing similar three items consisting of an abbreviated top, bottom (jeans or cut-offs) and panties or bras alternating, seldom does one see both together on one model.

Okay, you can add a pair of shoes or sneakers and make it four. Five with sox! But it all comes off on page one, page two at the latest!

There is no teasing, there is not enough clothing to make the set a good strip sequence, it is mostly simply a casual taking off of the few aforementioned items, and then on to a drawn out series of pictures showing the nude model from all angles. One could remove two thirds of these pictures and still have a complete set.

There is also a great misunderstanding on ATK's part of what “upskirt” really means, as only one example of inaccurate tagging. To most of us it has always meant a shot taken from floor level of the pantied (or naked) crotch above, but here it means everyone who spreads their legs with panties on. They might even start out in Jeans, but the tag says “upskirt.”

In ATK's defense, it is not because of any of their sites (and I've subscribed to most) that I quit collecting pictures, nor do I mean to imply that they are worse than most, since other picture sites are using identical dress and identical ways of shooting a model.

Not a single one of them seems to think that lingerie might be important to anyone nowadays and they might very well be right judging by all the sets designated “hot,” but this review is written for those like me who like “erotic” sets and might be disappointed because they don't find them.

To those who do like young and pretty models who can't be bothered with the inconvenience of putting on more than the bare essentials, this site is recommended!

It is also recommended for the technical quality of its pictures and videos alike, as well as for their generous daily updates.

It is a good site but not for anyone over thirty who likes a bit of spice (meaning erotic lingerie) along with their pretty women.

I left out the technical details because they are mentioned in other reviews and also because, for once, I wanted to drop objectivity in order to voice a purely personal, subjective beef when it comes to picture sites and the current state of erotic photography.

I did keep the score itself high because if would be unfair to make the site suffer because of my personal prejudices.

06-17-12  12:54pm

Replies (2)
Rating
21
Visit ATK Galleria

ATK Galleria
(2)

80.0
No Review.
07-16-12  06:51pm

Review
22
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(3)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A huge number of "hairy" models, most of them very good looking.

Large daily updates, usually consisting of eight picture sets and two videos.

Immensely improved lay-out. Very pleasing to the eye as well as easy to navigate.

The ability to leave comments on each set, video or model has been added. It is good to be able to voice one's preferences or dislikes.

Pictures since the beginning of 2011 are available in a super large format of 3000px.

Videos are very nice and crisp at 1280x720p.

Good download speeds for me.
Cons: Site has become more extreme, even though ATK owner would probably disagree with my assessment, but the emphasis appears to be more and more on a general fetish for hair rather than on beautiful young, un-enhanced girls who chose to keep their pubic hair. In the past SeanR, as one example, would offer up a hairy leg set now and then but now they are everywhere.
Bottom Line: This is a site in transition because, judging by members' comments and ratings, the membership has shifted dramatically from those who just weren't keen on the shaved look to those who almost worship hair itself: hairy legs, arm hair, pit hair, anal hair etc. They interpret "natural" to mean just that, a body that has never been touched by a razor.

This transition is also confirmed by ATK owner's own remarks, who wrote in connection with some complaints about models being too shaved except for the bush: "We did approach R....e about growing out her armpit and leg hair and she told us the timing was not right for her to do that right now. So possibly later."

I have a black eye and bleeding nose from making some unwelcome noises in the comments section over this change.

The latest one was in connection with my musing as to what a girl (with extremely hairy legs) was doing wearing men's cotton briefs? She appears to be a heavy favorite of many and I was brutally slain by one member for being so audacious as to make this blasphemous remark.

I must stress that this made absolutely no difference when it came to the rating of this site because, as the ATK owner himself pointed out, tolerance is requested in connection with everyone's tastes and who am I to be the arbiter of what's erotic and what isn't.

What does make a difference to me, though, is that so many sets are extremely bland with little imagination shown by the photographer.

The average model basically wears top and skirt with a pair of panties or top and jeans with or without a pair of panties, pretty painful for someone who likes the tease factor and does not like to see a model revealing her all right from the first page.

However there is such a fierce loyalty to the models shown by the hair fetishists that even dull sets are rated highly because of the extreme hair factor.

I have changed my mind about the previous low score I gave this site because it was based on my personal preferences.

This time around I am giving it a higher score by rating it as a TRUE FETISH site that will easily please all those who have a taste for extreme hair.

So I highly recommend it to this growing group of hair lovers, especially in light of the pros. The new lay-out is really nice, clean, impressive. I also like the ability to comment even though I am still nursing my wounds.

06-19-11  11:10am

Replies (12)
Review
23
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(3)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 10-28-10  07:49pm  (Update History)
Reason: Nope, just couldn't leave the score at 80. I tried to be objective but over 10 days with 8 picture updates a day I have downloaded ONE picture set!
Pros: Huge number of models and pictures.

Picture (around 1600x1065px) files can now be downloaded in one zip file.

Large daily updates.

Fast downloads for me.

Good search engine that really allows you to narrow down your choices.
Cons: I complained about this in my last review: Too little imagination shown by many photographers.

One of them uses the same dress and underwear on too many models. One striped dress in particular should be retired for good because I've seen it on at least four different models over the years.

Greater attention should be shown to the temperature of a picture set. Some are way too warm (too much color, too much of a yellowish, orange tinge).

Quality of models seems to be deteriorating with too many heavily tattooed and pierced ladies on the pay roll. Introduction of hardcore material has not done the site any good either. This was not taken into consideration when scoring because many like hardcore and consider this a plus.

I still don't like the present set-up when it comes to up-dates. To a newcomer it must be very confusing to see previous updates in numbered "volumes."

Videos have improved SOME (854x480px, 2149 TB) but still fall short in days where HD has become standard
Bottom Line: I adjusted my score upward from the 75 I gave this site in my last review because I have already found some quite well done sets of beautiful hairy ladies in my first few days back with this site and with the large daily updates I expect to see enough worthwhile material to make my month's subscription a good deal.

Nov. 13, 2010:

However, now I am forced to downgrade even more because the quality of the updates is truly appalling. The models are lacking, with too many sporting tattoos, piercings, scars etc., the photography, as mentioned above, is consistently dull.

My take is that ATK Natural and Hairy is on its way out and is making a last ditch effort to keep or build its subscriber base by throwing 8 picture updates plus two videos a day at the consumer. This will be fine, of course, by those who like to rip a site but to the discriminating collector the present ATK is a disaster.

Just to show I am not being too subjective: I just counted the past thirteen updates containing 104 picture sets and only five of them were voted as "hot" by the subscribers!

Folks are fed up and it's obvious by the score they give the sets.

10-18-10  07:25pm

Replies (10)
Review
24
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(3)

75.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of attractive, hirsute models.

Daily updates containing new photo sets as well as video segments.

A way to rate the quality of a picture set as well as the "hotness" (or not) of a given model which is great when the photographer missed in his shoot and the set is rated low. This way one can always mollify the model by going to her page and give her a five (hot) if one loves the model but hates the present set.

Good search engine.
Cons: The quality of the picture sets is wildly uneven.

In today's (Sept. 29, '08) update, for instance, one set is way too dark, one has a bluish tinge throughout, and the one containing one of my favorites is way too saturated with color to be pleasing to the ordinary eye.

I find, in general, that lately the photographers don't show too much imagination and that many of their sets could be clones of one another. I've even seen the same set of underwear on three different models.

There is still no way to download a whole set of pictures with one zip file.

Videos are still ill-lit, lacking color and definition, of early 2000s quality and not up to 2008 standards and generally not worth downloading. A few of the more tolerable ones have a video-grapher who never shuts up, forcing one to watch them with the sound turned off.
Bottom Line: I'm currently on my second subscription (this time a 3 month one) to this site because first time around I was so delighted to find a "natural" (read hairy) site that it blinded me a bit to its shortcomings.

The models are beautiful, but they (the site) desperately need new photographers and new models, a few more mature ones wouldn't hurt and also find a way to treat the picture sets with Photoshop or similar program so the pics will look more natural before they present them to their subscribers.

I really find it appalling that nothing has been done to improve the quality of the videos since I subscribed the first time. I realize that this is primarily a soft core picture site but with the sets getting boring, proof: lower and lower marks by the viewers on many of the sets, it would have been nioe to have decent videos as alternatives.

This is another site that had great success initially and is now resting on its laurels by stubbornly sticking to an outdated formula.

I would still recommend it to hair lovers because sites like this are hard to find these days. I can't even recommend an alternative since the one site that could compete with ATK Natural And Hairy has material of even lesser quality.

Bottom line: ATK's Natural And Hairy leaves me more and more bored in connection with picture sets and videos that never seem to change.

09-29-08  11:42am

Replies (7)
Review
25
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(3)

89.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Large selection of attractive, hirsute models.
Large selection of high-quality picture sets. Updated faithfully. Easy to navigate.
Cons: Many of the videos are of inferior quality. Some of the video graphers conduct awkward, painful to listen to, conversations with the models, in order to put them at ease, I suppose? In any case, they achieve the opposite effect in viewer and in model alike. There is also one photographer (SeanR) who uses a bit too much make-up on the various models, making them look like painted dolls rather than the attractive women they could be.
Bottom Line: A great site for hair lovers. Highly recommended even though my cons took up a lot of space.

Follow-Up:
The sets by SeanR have become far better with less make-up and better flesh tones.

11-16-07  02:22pm

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-25 of 89 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.13 seconds.