Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : messmer (137)  

Feedback:   All (2160)  |   Reviews (75)  |   Comments (238)  |   Replies (1847)

Other:   Replies Received (1284)  |   Trust Ratings (77)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 89 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
26
Visit Lady Suspender

Lady Suspender
(0)

85.0
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: + Mostly Mature Amateur Models. I did recognize some models from Pro sites but they are few and far between.

+ Exclusive contents.

+ Sticks faithfully to its niche of catering to girdle and old-fashioned lingerie fetishists.

+ No Download Restrictions.

+ Pictures can be downloaded zipped.
Cons: Picture sets are relatively small and are basically just repeating what you can see on the video clips.

Torturous search to find all the parts of a video since they come in small chunks over a period of time.

Very confusing and old-fashioned interface.

If I remember right video was at 640x480, 1000 bitrate, a bit underpowered for 2009 but not bad.
Might have improved in the meantime. I will let you know in a comment when I re-subscribe to this site.
Bottom Line: I felt the need to make this quick new review because I was not entirely fair to this site in my previous one.

Because, at the time, I was only a member for one month I assumed that full DVDs could only be obtained by ordering them at outrageous prices (by North American standards) from this site.

I have discovered in the meantime that, with enough patience, all the parts of the DVD can be obtained with the membership .. so I retract my remarks re. "shilling" and will up the score at the same time.

Not only that, but I find that I retained quite a few clips from this site because they have kept their appeal to me over the past year, something I can't say for every site I have subscribed to.

I would recommend this site to lovers of mature amateur women and especially of mature apparel like girdles, slips, nylons, full nylon panties, garter belts etc.

Don't expect hardcore. This is a very soft core site, catering primarily to the fetish mentioned above. It contains some mild lesbian and spanking scenes and a lot of intimate fitting of various foundational garments that allow the (female) fitter to do a bit of lusty groping. There is nudity but it is of the discrete kind, no "gapes" to be found here.

02-04-10  07:38pm

Replies (0)
Review
27
Visit Porn.com

Porn.com
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Large selection of DVDs. Over 5328 listed as of todate, broken down into 27700 videos (scenes).

+ Streaming is of excellent quality at 640x480. Compared to VideoBox it streamed very smoothly even with seven simultaneous downloads going on.

+ Downloads are available in three different formats. Small mp4s for handheld devices, medium 480x320 for wmv and H264 format (mp4) at 640x480.*

*Recent addition of wmv files at 720x480 at 2628kbps.

+ Huge Pictures Archive (over 2 Million listed)

+ Clean design of Home Page with exclusive scenes listed on top, a featured star in the middle and the latest additons to the DVD selection on the bottom. Updates to 55 special sites are featured on the right.

+ Search is quite easy. It allows you to look for models, latest videos, scenes, categories, Dvd series through a drop down menu which often offers extra search options. HOWEVER: search is often inaccurate and gives results that don't fit what you were looking for.
Cons: - Forget about the pictures. If you look at them and download them individually in "large" mode they are 768x1024 px, however if you should choose to download them zipped they are in a very antiquated 600x800 px format. Download of a complete set, for testing purposes, was done with the latest set offered (Sept.11).

- I listed the ability to download in three different formats as a plus but as you can see, quality could be better.*

*see above for additional choice

- Of the fifty-five bonus sites listed many have not updated since 2006-2007. The ones that are still being updated are often updated once a month only. It would be better to look at them as an extra bunch of scenes you can view (today's figure 1933 scenes).

- Download speed still a tad low for a broadband user (250 - 350 KB/s average, sometimes even a bit less) but by downloading seven scenes simultaneously as a trial (average file size 300 - 600 MB) I still managed to download all in an hour. So, all in all, not bad.
Bottom Line: Despite all the cons I still think that Porn.com is an excellent value for those who love DVDs. No doubt you will have seen many of them before, seeing that most are non-exclusive, but there are quite a few that were new to me and therefore would make a subscription at $ 10.00 US very worthwhile.

And it is a site that makes browsing fun because their streaming is so good (for me.) It allows me to watch a whole scene or look around, while tons of stuff is downloading in the background.

Now comes my biggest problem with not only Porn.com but with its sister site Download Pass, while they have the contents I like and while I like the sites themselves and their lay-out just fine I do not like the way they conduct business.

I cancelled (to see how cancellation worked now that they have made some adjustments) and while the process went flawlessly when I used the url given in the original receipt of my subscription I noticed two very unlikeable things: one, there was a pre-checked offer of a free trial to another site that would renew at its usual ridiculous price (39? 49? Dollars) so if you should forget to un-check the offer ... well you know the rest. A user in a hurry might not notice, so Porn.com please get rid of anything pre-checked, and two, I was promised an acknowledgment of my cancellation by email and once again, just as with Download Pass, it never arrived. No, it's not in my Spam folder!

They never re-billed me last time, so I'm a bit more relaxed about it this time around but this should not happen with a reputable Billing company and tends to make the user nervous.

I sure wish, not only for my sake but for theirs as well that they picked a billing company like CCBill or Epoch to put people more at ease about subscribing.

Summing up: If you are willing to put up with a bit of nail-biting re. billing and are careful with pre-checked offers upon leaving I do recommend the site to DVD lovers for its large and varied contents. I like the site very much and once I find that I won't be rebilled after my cancellation I might just return to it. The price is certainly right.

October 4, 2009

Another few short remarks before leaving: I got amazing results re. speed when using DownThemAll through Firefox. The only way to go!

Their security measures are still overdone and annoying: On top of a username and password you also have to provide a personal identification number and type in a CAPCHA (security code).

Hidden among all the stuff you have seen before there are quite a few German videos that you haven't. A knowledge of German would help but they are still quite interesting even if the sound is turned off. Be prepared for a long leading up to the main action, though, it's the European way. Just type in "German" under search and you will be led there.

It's been a positive experience for me, now we'll see in two days how the cancellation goes because I never did get that promised email acknowledgment.

09-12-09  11:20am

Replies (4)
Review
28
Visit White Ghetto

White Ghetto
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 254 DVDs listed.

Daily updates, ranging from 5 to 8 scenes

Video quality is good at High Quality wmv files at 2000 kbps. There is a lower quality option.

Wide variety of niches covered in main site and in
17 bonus sites.

Speed is excellent for me.
Cons: DVDs are not necessarily complete because scenes are being added on a daily basis to various Videos listed.

Some of the same videos listed in White Ghetto are also found on Bonus sites.

Updates are for the whole network, so five to eight a day, each consisting of a scene seems a bit meager.
Bottom Line: I like this site and its bonus sites because they DO present something different. Some have called some of the videos bizarre and they are, certainly many of the models would not be to everyone's liking, but because this site offers, in a multitude of niches, what cannot normally be found (at least not in large quantities) in the more polished and glamorous sites I give it a happy thumbs up.

The great divide again: if you like beauty and glamor stay away, if you like rude and raw and not always pretty then I recommend this site to you.

05-09-09  01:23pm

Replies (0)
Review
29
Visit Anilos

Anilos
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Mostly very good looking mature women.

+Video quality is excellent.

+Picture quality is excellent. Most sets can be downloaded in normal and large. All are zipped.

+Navigation is excellent.

+Download speed has been consistent around 1.7 MB/s.

+Regular updates.
Cons: Not enough of a choice of models just yet. A new site can not be faulted for that so this did not affect the score.

Most of the models are between thirty and forty, a few more over forty would lend a welcome "balance" to the site, that, plus the fact that they allowed women with fake breasts with visible scars to sneak into another wise great line-up of models, kept my score in the mid eighties.

Not enough pubic hair (my personal preference, again not counted against the site as most Porn Users prefer the shaved look).
Bottom Line: I believe this will be a great site once it expands a bit more.

I downloaded all the great ones (according to my taste) like Berkley, Dee Dee, Fallon and Calliste yesterday and was so pleased with the videos and picture sets that I feel I already got full value for my money and the rest will be gravy, especially if there should be (hopefully) an update for one or all of the above mentioned models during the remaining period of my subscription.

My suggestion would be, if you're not greedy but go for the best in a site: take the tour, see if you can find at least three, four models that appeal to you. If you can, subscribe, download them and consider it good value for your money.

That's how good the quality of Anilos' material is!

After my subscription is up I'll certainly make it a point to make regular visits to the site to see how it is coming along.

03-18-09  09:56am

Replies (8)
Review
30
Visit All Over 30

All Over 30
(1)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Mostly very good looking models from thirty to fifty years of age.

Very well organized site with a good search engine.

Various niches to please most tastes.

Six weekly updates containing picture sets and videos.

Pictures are of very good quality, especially at
1536X1024 resolution. And they are in zip format for an easy download.

Speed has been excellent for me at approx. 1.1 MB/s.
Cons: Videos are inexcusably bad for 2008.

Some of the photographers should be given the pink slip because their sets are either lacking lighting or are not sharp enough, or in the case of one photographer always seem to have a pinkish tinge rather than the natural skin tones one expects.

I also find that way too many sets contain toys (a plus for others) while there are too few sets with truly mature women over fifty which limits my choice of downloads considerably.

I rejoice over some of the truly excellent sets of pictures I have found on this site but am already at a point where I only look in to see if the daily update contains anything that might interest me. Most days it doesn't. Reading some of the other reviews my "cons" might very well be someone else's pros, that's why, in order to be fair, I gave the site a "Very Good."

My rating would shoot up dramatically if the site contained less "toys" and more "lacy" sets, as well as a huge improvement when it comes to videos.
Bottom Line: AllOver30 is a quality site that I would recommend to all those who are tired of the cuteness and sameness of teenies.

I would join just as a thank you to those who feel that anyone over twenty is still worthwhile looking at, but at the same time I bemoan the fact that they don't cater more, through a set or two a week, to those of us who think a woman over fifty can still be exciting and beautiful.

I think that is a category that is being sadly neglected in most sites, it would certainly fit perfectly in a site like AO30.

10-07-08  02:27pm

Replies (2)
Review
31
Visit ATK Exotics

ATK Exotics
(0)

82.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A large selection of attractive, exotic models.

Nice and crisp photography.

Fair to good HD videos (depending on photographer).

Huge daily updates (5 picture sets Monday-Friday, 1 retro picture set on Saturday, 10 movies on Sundays)

Excellent download speeds for me.

Very attractive home page.
Cons: Be warned, I decided to be very subjective, most ATK Exotics subscribers may vehemently disagree:

There is a deadly sameness to most picture sets even though the skin color varies. See bottom line.

I would prefer to have video updates on a daily basis rather than having to wait one week for the next update. I think a change there would be very important to those of us whose taste changed from collecting pictures to videos.

Saturday's update is dedicated to picture sets from their archives. Last week they were all dated 2005. This might be a plus for some and would be for me if they were in today's high resolution.

I still don't understand this “volume” business after many subscriptions to ATK's sites.

An email sent to support over five days ago never brought an acknowledgment.
Bottom Line: I really thought I was done with mixed picture/video sites, especially those whose emphasis is heavily on pictures, but a very attractive email offer showed up and I couldn't resist, figuring that a site with such a vast amount of material would have some sets that would re-ignite my interest in pictures.

In vain!

There are some sets where the model wears a pretty nightie or other lingerie (mostly cotton panties) but those sets are exceedingly rare and when you do run across them chances are the model divests herself of same nightie or lingerie within the first ten pictures.

What this site amounts to is a heap of nice, fresh, good looking young ladies of all ethnic stripes wearing similar three items consisting of an abbreviated top, bottom (jeans or cut-offs) and panties or bras alternating, seldom does one see both together on one model.

Okay, you can add a pair of shoes or sneakers and make it four. Five with sox! But it all comes off on page one, page two at the latest!

There is no teasing, there is not enough clothing to make the set a good strip sequence, it is mostly simply a casual taking off of the few aforementioned items, and then on to a drawn out series of pictures showing the nude model from all angles. One could remove two thirds of these pictures and still have a complete set.

There is also a great misunderstanding on ATK's part of what “upskirt” really means, as only one example of inaccurate tagging. To most of us it has always meant a shot taken from floor level of the pantied (or naked) crotch above, but here it means everyone who spreads their legs with panties on. They might even start out in Jeans, but the tag says “upskirt.”

In ATK's defense, it is not because of any of their sites (and I've subscribed to most) that I quit collecting pictures, nor do I mean to imply that they are worse than most, since other picture sites are using identical dress and identical ways of shooting a model.

Not a single one of them seems to think that lingerie might be important to anyone nowadays and they might very well be right judging by all the sets designated “hot,” but this review is written for those like me who like “erotic” sets and might be disappointed because they don't find them.

To those who do like young and pretty models who can't be bothered with the inconvenience of putting on more than the bare essentials, this site is recommended!

It is also recommended for the technical quality of its pictures and videos alike, as well as for their generous daily updates.

It is a good site but not for anyone over thirty who likes a bit of spice (meaning erotic lingerie) along with their pretty women.

I left out the technical details because they are mentioned in other reviews and also because, for once, I wanted to drop objectivity in order to voice a purely personal, subjective beef when it comes to picture sites and the current state of erotic photography.

I did keep the score itself high because if would be unfair to make the site suffer because of my personal prejudices.

06-17-12  12:54pm

Replies (2)
Review
32
Visit Suburban Amateurs

Suburban Amateurs
(0)

82.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Beautiful British Girls who like to address you personally in dirty language .. a nice, naughty touch.

Many of the sets and videos contain models in erotic lingerie, very much a plus for me.

Softcore only with the occasional Lesbian scene mixed in.

Pictures and Videos are available for download. Picture sets are available zipped.

Regular updates, with the photo sets having the advantage.
Cons: This site has not kept up with the times. The very latest picture sets are quite nice at 2000x3000px, but the best videos are still regrettably at 720x540 wmv with a total bitrate anywhere between 1700 and 3000, and one does not have to go back very far to run into picture sets that display at only 2000px or even 1024px.

In 2007 I praised this site for the latter, now it's hopelessly outdated.

Search engine that is praiseworthy for giving one so many choices in one's search is actually quite inaccurate. Just one example, I searched for one of my niches "hairy" and got mostly "shaved" models as a result.

Normal downloads through the browser are extremely slow for me. However I got respectable speeds when downloading videos through DTA.

Cluttered home page.
Bottom Line: You have no idea how much I want to like this site. After all, who could resist British models talking dirty while getting rid of their clothes, or a set of pictures that really takes its time when it comes to stripping down to the bare essentials (well, not always bare), but two things aggravate me, a) that they have not kept up with the times when it comes to videos and b) their horribly outdated 5 bonus sites.

What makes things worse is that only one bonus site "Suburban Sluts" allows downloads while all the others contain either streaming only videos, or they are picture sites without the zip option forcing one to download each picture laboriously one by one. But even the "Suburban Sluts" videos and pictures are so outdated that no one would want to download them anyway. Their last update must have been years ago. So, forget it when it comes to bonus sites.*

*Just noticed that the two picture bonus sites update to this day. However, no zip, so useless to most unless they have the proper "tools!"

Same as last time I won`t judge this site for its bonus content but am disappointed that they have not discovered HD yet.

I will nevertheless recommend it because there are enough videos and photo sets of erotic value to be enjoyed, even though the clarity in full picture, on my monitor, is not exactly mind blowing.

And I do like girls talking dirty, especially when they wear nice lingerie! I`ll just have to get used to watch them in a smaller window where the picture is quite crisp.

Since the updates are so slow in coming I would recommend a one month subscription only.

05-24-11  02:47pm

Replies (8)
Review
33
Visit Vintage Flash

Vintage Flash
(0)

82.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 12-06-10  09:43am  (Update History)
Reason: Score adjusted upward because complaint about slow speeds appears to have been an abberation rather than the rule.
Pros: Great looking British models.

Sexy vintage lingerie. Latest videos and picture sets are of good quality. Videos at present come in at 1280 x 720 px at 5000 kbps. Picture sets are of good quality as well and are available in zipped format.

Content not overwhelming but 470 Picture Sets and 244 Videos (many of the older ones are, of course, of lesser quality) isn't too bad either.

Love British accents.

Additional three bonus sites.
Cons: Site does not allow you to stop and then resume a download.

Not download manager friendly. My trusty DownThemAll gave me the same speed as the regular browser downloader.

Awful, inadequate search engine. I saw one picture on the tour and it was this picture that enticed me to subscribe. Do you think I can find that set? Rhetorical question! I suppose I will before the month is up.

Only one update every five days.

The three bonus sites do not offer a great deal of content.

Access to bonus sites requires a separate sign-in.
Bottom Line: Despite some of the negatives a nice site.

The few videos I downloaded yesterday were great. Lovely vintage lingerie (full size panties, nylons and garter belts, girdles, bras etc.) I am looking forward to downloading quite a bit more of their great videos (at least the newer ones) because just about every one of them looks tempting. The "dirty" talk by the models doesn't hurt either!

The three bonus sites "Pantyhosed4U" (305 photo sets, 138 videos), "VFAcademy" (69 photo sets, 70 videos), and "VintageFlash.Archives" (236 photo sets, 1 video!) are nice to have but aren't big enough, or update often enough, to make subscription to this site worthwhile for more than one month.

I like the mother site (reviewed), it does have its flaws but at least, for once, I don't have to condemn a site out of hand which is refreshing.

Recommended to fans of vintage lingerie and British models.

12-05-10  01:40pm

Replies (14)
Review
34
Visit Old Young Lesbian Love

Old Young Lesbian Love
(0)

82.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: True to its Lesbian Theme.

Original contents with mostly attractive elderly and young ladies.

Updates regularly.

Excellent quality in newer videos, going as high as 1920 x 1080p in wmv and h264 format, with a total bitrate of over 8000 kbps.

Excellent picture quality, now in High Resolution
4288 x 2848px. The sets usually follow the action of the video but are NOT vidcaps. There are also many solo shots of the individual models included.

Excellent download speed for me at 3.5 MB/s.

Part of a large network (21Sextury).
Cons: At present only 55 scenes are listed. The site was established in May 2010 and while updates are regular they come only once a week.

Only 62 models, young and old.

Some of the older scenes listed in this site were originally published in "Lusty Grandmas."
Bottom Line: Quite frankly I am enjoying sites like these with its mature ladies who would not win a beauty contest but give me the feeling instead that they could be my elderly neighbor next door. Anyone who likes glamor and glitz would not enjoy this site. Anyone for whom forty years old is ancient, might as well stay away but I enjoy the company of my peers!

In the past I had taken 21Sextury to task for being so neglectful when it came to their sites that featured very mature women, because most hadn't been updated in years, which left me with only "Lusty Grandmas."

But now I am willing to give this site a score over 80, not only for its quality material, but also as a thank you to 21Sextury for adding it to my line up of sites.

The "Lusty Grandmas" are glad to finally have company.

11-01-10  03:26pm

Replies (3)
Rating
35
Visit Orgy Max

Orgy Max
(0)

82.0
No Review.
04-26-10  01:09pm

Review
36
Visit Aunt Judy's

Aunt Judy's
(1)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 11-06-12  12:14pm  (Update History)
Reason: Streaming and DL Managers now possible.
Pros: Vast amount of old Aunt Judys/Older women material stored in the archives.

Very much improved members' page under the new management of ATK.

Much improved quality in Hi-Res picture sets and an even more startling improvement in videos over those offered by “Older Women” in the past. Most updates (except remastered ones) are now in true HD.

Same excellent search engine as in the other ATK sites.

Access to ATK Lounge.

No download restrictions.

Fast download speeds ... however, read below.
Cons: Streaming a video is discouraged, so that more bandwidth is available for downloads. Despite my fast download speeds (max of my modem) navigation within the site was sluggish.***

Download managers are not allowed. I wasn't sure if Firefox' DTA, when downloading one video at a time, was considered to be a true manager and used it consistently without being stopped. If I crossed the line, my apologies to the new managers of the site. ***

*** This was only recommended during the first few days. Streaming and Download Managers are now allowed. Score upgraded by 5.

Updates are a mixture of Aunt Judy and “bonus” picture sets and videos imported from ATK Natural and Hairy (Mature Hairy). This has caused complaints from those who are subscribing to both sites at the same time. I was surprised myself when I downloaded some picture sets and found that I had them already from a previous membership to ATK N&H.
Bottom Line: I must confess that it was a disappointing month for me. I had received an email by the old "Aunt Judys/Older Women” site offering me a membership for $ 9.95 a month (recurring), with the notification that the site was now under new management. I had not liked AJ/OW for a long time because the “tease and erotic factor” had declined dramatically over the past few years, but could not resist .. just to see how ATK would do with one of my formerly favorite sites.

My first impression was and still is: not ready for prime time. Without the imports from “Mature Hairy” their updates would be very skimpy but what saddens me more is that ATK's new content is every bit as bland as that of the former site in its dying years. And no I am not calling for hardcore material, just for more excitement in the solos.

This might appear to be a very unfair assessment when viewed from the “web owner's“ side but I have to repeat once again that any review, especially that of a layman, has to be subjective so take my score with a grain of salt. Not everyone feels the way I do. And I still believe that the new management will eventually create a very attractive site. If it will be for me remains to be seen.

Old AJ (pre 2007 or so): lots and lots of enticing lingerie, or a prolonged strip, on attractive “housewifey” models.

New AJ/OW (until take-over by ATK): most models came with three very basic items of clothing that they would take off within the first few pictures of a set, or within a couple of minutes if it was a video.

New ATK AJ: same thing, which can make a set very boring unless one absolutely loves a model and collects her, no matter how utilitarian and sparse her attire may be.

My old complaint, as in so many other sites, is that the tease factor has disappeared and, without that, so has my libido when it comes to most sets or videos. There are only so many positions you can place a naked body in so, why give them so little to wear and why undress them so quickly. At least if you dressed the women in more than the “bare” essentials there would be a difference from set to set.

I let the subscription lapse (yesterday was my last day) despite the low price because I could not find any picture sets during the past month that truly excited me. I gave some of them high marks because of the model herself, or because of factors like quality and lighting and crispness of picture etc. Or because of the way the photographer posed his models but it was done half-heartedly.

I sincerely hope that the pendulum will eventually swing back to the way things were and that at least one set from a shoot will contain a nice strip or lingerie.

09-23-12  12:10pm

Replies (4)
Rating
37
Visit ATK Galleria

ATK Galleria
(0)

80.0
No Review.
07-16-12  06:51pm

Rating
38
Visit Young Legal Porn

Young Legal Porn
(3)

80.0
No Review.
06-12-12  10:50am

Rating
39
Visit Zero Tolerance On Demand

Zero Tolerance On Demand
(2)

80.0
No Review.
02-27-12  12:58pm

Rating
40
Visit Third Movies

Third Movies
(0)

80.0
No Review.
02-27-12  12:55pm

Review
41
Visit Art-Lingerie

Art-Lingerie
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 05-17-11  11:07am  (Update History)
Reason: Since this is primarily a picture site the consistent blurriness (softness) of the HR pictures forces me to downgrade my original score.
Pros: Beautiful models. Some of them very well known and sought after.

Good selection of picture sets and videos.

Pictures come in three different sizes with the biggest ones weighing in at 3000x2000. Typical set is rather small though.

Videos come in two sizes: a smaller one at 640x360p, but very crisp, and an HD one at 1280x720p.

Both sizes are very nice when it comes to clarity of the picture. Videos vary in length. Some can be as short as 3-5 minutes or as long as 11 minutes. There might be longer ones but I haven't come across them. On the other hand, if you have a solo model slowly divesting herself of her lingerie you don't really need a 30 minute video.

Pictures and Videos are downloadable with no restrictions!

Daily Updates alternating between picture and video.
Cons: The naming is horrible. A combination of numbers and letters plus the size you downloaded, that's about it. (eg. 2180-zzD-Ultra.zip) It forces you to stop and rename each and every file when it has finished downloading so that you will remember the name of the model inside the zip.

I am a picture person at heart but was disappointed with the quality of the High Resolution pictures at 3000x2000. They almost reminded me of Twisty's or Only Tease. Too much body make-up, too much air brushing, too much photo shop? Picture became way too soft because of the way it was treated.

It's presented in a size where one should be able to count every pore and hair and fold of garment on a model but in my sample sets I couldn't.

Focus was in the wrong place at times as well. But I guess that's where the "art" comes in.

I had very slow speeds when using DTA and was surprised to find that I was doing better with my ordinary Firefox downloader .. but even then I barely managed more than 500-600KB/s
Bottom Line: A very nice, user friendly site for lovers of erotic lingerie. It has the same basic lay-out as Only Tease and if you've ever been a member of that site you will know that it has to be excellent.

I liked the idea that in some sets and videos the model started out with more than just bra, panties, garter belt and stockings (sadly many of them ARE like that) but would have liked them to finish fully nude.

They don't hide anything, as opposed to OT, but be warned the site is very softcore! Don't expect spreading or masturbation or insertions, you won't find it here.

The models are very appealing to me despite their youth. I guess that touch of fine lingerie helps. Too bad about the pictures, though. I will restrict myself to downloading videos until someone decides to do away with all that powder and sharpens the pictures a bit.

It is my opinion that they built themselves a very nice site here with lots of content considering they are only a couple of years old and I would recommend it to lingerie lovers, if for nothing else than the HD videos that can be found right from their beginning in 2009. I would even recommend it to picture lovers if they don't mind that soft look!

If they renamed their zip files to something more practical like "Eufrat01HR.zip" for instance I would happily give them a higher rating because the models and lingerie are truly stunning, but the present way of naming files is annoying me no end.

04-25-11  04:05pm

Replies (2)
Review
42
Visit Daily Sex Dose

Daily Sex Dose
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Daily updates as name implies.

Beautiful models, Eve Angel and Sophie Moone among them.

Quality pictures available in 853x1280 as well as in large at 2246x3370px. Picture sets can be quite large. Sample set contained 188 photos.

Videos available in various formats. I especially like to have the choice of HD videos. They are available at 1280x720px 4596 kbps wmv format as well as in 1920x1080px in wmv and mp4.

Downloads were extremely fast for me at 3.5 MB/s when using DTA (Firefox).

Part of the 21Sextury Network.
Cons: Mostly solo sets, something that appeals to me but others might like something a bit harder.

There are only 4 GG and 2 BG among 53 scenes.

My usual complaint (but not reflected in the score) the girls get nude and down to business too quickly. Again others might enjoy exactly that but I find I get bored very easily if masturbation or any sort of sexual activity goes on too long. I would prefer a slower lead-in to the action and a bit more lingerie on the ladies.
Bottom Line: Another quality site by 21Sextury.

At the moment they only have 53 scenes and matching photo sets, but with their daily updates they should grow rapidly.

However it is my feeling that they should vary the solos a bit more because one's boredom threshold could be reached very quickly.

Photography and videography are outstanding as usual, but you will pay for the quality with having to download extremely large files.

If you like a more softcore site among the many offered by 21Sextury this might be the one for you.

In any case membership does include quite a few bonus sites ( I got 47 for a one year subscription) but there's a respectable number of them even for the short term subscriber.

Another bonus is that the price will reduce from month to month so you can't really go wrong on this one. Recommended.

02-21-11  06:57pm

Replies (2)
Review
43
Visit Karup's Older Women

Karup's Older Women
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 01-28-11  11:08am  (Update History)
Reason: Original score restored. See remarks below and also under comments.
Pros: A huge archive of mature, attractive models.

Picture sets: Older sets display at 1024x680 px, not bad if they are all like the sample set, dated 2005, that I test-downloaded. Newer sets are at 1500x1001px.

Latest videos are in HD at 1280x720, total bitrate close to 4000 kbps. Nice! I could not quite determine when either pictures or videos changed to a higher resolution but it cannot have been too long ago because even early 2010 videos are in 640x480 at 2000 kbps. However it must be stressed that they, as well, are of good quality and quite crisp if one does not insist on watching them full screen.

Excellent search engine.

Excellent basic home page lay out, even though it looks a bit dated, but it makes it very easy to find one's way around.
Cons: Bonus pictures and feeds: Bonus picture sets are from AllOver30 and Anilos. It would be nice if they could be downloaded zipped and in their best resolution. Many of us simply don't feel like downloading a set, one picture at a time.

The bonus "feeds" are even more disappointing because they consist of 1 minute clips of various DVDs only, and are further ruined by a logo running across the picture. Karups would do better not to offer bonuses that aren't really bonuses.

However, in all fairness, one of the bonuses, KarupsPC Content, is a nice little gift because the picture sets are zipped and the quality itself is fine even though they date back to 2005.

Search engine, as much as I like it, should have the additional function of filtering HD content and High Res Picture sets. Many users are no longer content with less than HD quality and don't like to sift through all the updates and models to find what they want.

Too many enhanced breasts.

Cons continued below:
Bottom Line: The term older does not really fit because most models would be called MILFS or Cougars or Mature in other places. There is only a handful of models over 50 and only one over 60.


Bottom Line:

A nice, solid, quality site for lovers of mature women. So far it does not live up to my personal expectations because my preferred niche is erotic lingerie, while most models that are found under "Lingerie" or "Panties" in their advanced search appear to wear daily ho-hum "underwear" that is practical rather than arousing.

Experience has taught me that my taste is not necessarily the generally accepted one so I won't hold this against the site.

I have also found a few videos and picture sets that do come a bit closer to what I want in the short time I have been with this site, so who knows, maybe between the updates and the site's vast store of material I'll be able to dig out a few more erotic nuggets during my month of membership.

Edited Jan. 28, 2011

I received a notice yesterday informing me that my subscription had expired despite the fact that I have still three weeks to go. Access was cut off immediately and two emails to support to correct the situation brought no response. It is impossible to get in touch with their Billing Company because the only link provided is that of KarupsOW support. Because support, when needed, plays such an important part I have downgraded my review by five points.

Edit: Score restored to its original because I got a response to my 3rd email informing me of a glitch in their system and their efforts to correct it. Additional days have been promised for every day lost now.

01-20-11  01:19pm

Replies (6)
Rating
44
Visit Silverstone DVD

Silverstone DVD
(0)

80.0
No Review.
12-03-09  03:23pm

Review
45
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)

80.0
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Large archive of beautiful "next door" kind of models.

Picture sets are technically excellent and come in zipped format. Videos have improved quite a bit from the last time I wrote a review, and they were good even then, but still fall short of those of the new, more up-to-date HD format carrying sites.

True to its niche.

Excellent download speed.
Cons: The biggest con is that this site was split up into three different ones. I got a special returning members rate for all three but, to me, it is still unfathomable why they would do that.

For instance, there will never be any long term subscribers to their g/g site because updates are so slow in coming, so this move does not seem very wise.

As others have pointed out, both photo sets and videos have become boring because the "tease factor" (according to the webmaster) is being stretched out too much. Maybe they really toned things down in anticipation of the coming raid?

When it comes to the photo sets, I hate those shots of one breast, or part of a hip etc. I don't see the reason for them. Show the whole model in landscape now and then and give us some pink!

My personal beef (not influencing the score) is that when it comes to underwear, cotton and wool appear to triumph. It would be so nice to see something glistening and silky under those jeans and sweaters once in a while.
Bottom Line: For those who yearn for technical details, my apologies, two months plus after having been a returning member I cannot remember them (except that they had switched to a crisper mp4 format for their latest videos) and I have nothing on my hard drive to go by because, of all the downloads from all three sites, nothing was kept. Regrettable for an ex-favorite.

Which will definitely explain why I lowered the score from my original review (90) to a more realistic (for these times) 80.

My favorite site of natural girls being slightly naughty has become a ho-hum triple site of natural girls being coy.

The technical quality is still there, the large archive is still there, the girls are still pretty so, for those who like their porn very soft, it would still be a pretty fair site .. if only they hadn't split it up. I really couldn't recommend a single site of theirs for the price they ask for.

P.S. Two months or so later: For honesty's sake, I did come across some g/g and IM video clips I had kept recently so I take back what I said above about having deleted everything. But sadly what I had kept was still slim pickings from a triple site and does not affect the score.

07-22-09  01:15pm

Replies (2)
Review
46
Visit Naughty America

Naughty America
(8)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Twenty-three different niches to pick from.

You have the ability to build scenes based on your personal preferences, a novel and exciting choice. For instance, if you want a scene involving a hairy MILF who is your friend's Mom, having sex in the living room it's only a couple of clicks away.

If you want a scene involving your sister's friend, shaved, in the bedroom it's there as well. All you have to do is tick the boxes that would contribute most to your personal dream scene. Neat!

A refreshing difference when it comes to porn videos, there's actually a short story leading up to every "main event!"

A wide variety of scenes available, filmed in good quality. I download primarily high quality wmv files and the bit rate is 2000, not HD but good enough.

Zipped picture sets are offered to accompany a scene with a choice of high or low resolution.

Some older scenes are being remastered and look very nice and crisp.

Download speed has been excellent for me.
Cons: Picture sets are only helpful if you want a quick look at where a scene will take you because the individual pictures are tiny (less than 600x800) by today's standards.

The quality of the videos is good, to have a story line requiring a bit of acting, even though short, is refreshing, yet there is a strange lack of eroticism when it comes to most scenes. It is, in my eyes, once again porn made according to a certain formula.

I found myself very quickly bored because of this and don't think I will visit too often once I've downloaded my favorite MILFs.
Bottom Line: When I referred to a lack of eroticism and the videos being formulaic one thing came to mind: there may be a short introduction to the scene but it seems that every model goes from fully clothed to naked in a split second. A gradual, teasing undressing would be so nice and so appropriate. It would also be so helpful if at the end of a scene a bit of tenderness were shown. This site is not like other sites, in that models are treated with respect and the scenes are filmed in beautiful surroundings. A bit of a tease at the beginning, a fitting ending is all it would take to make this a very desirable site.

I would still recommend it for its quality but would not put it on top of my list because of the too quick transition from a couple of minutes of small talk to completely nude and ready to go. Just doesn't ring an erotic bell with me.

05-08-09  01:03pm

Replies (0)
Review
47
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(4)

80.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: +Large selection of attractive models.
+Large selection of videos and picture sets.
+Extremely fast download speed.
+Excellent search engine.
+True to its niche as glamor site.
Cons: The pictures, the pictures, the pictures. They all remind me of the false glamor of Playboy and Penthouse .. limbs that seem to be powdered with orange make up, faces and bodies without blemish or pore, colors way too warm. Only a few sets show true more "coolish" body color. My personal peeve, as commented on in another spot: too few landscape type pics. The sets are numbing in their sameness: model standing up in dress, model standing up without dress, model standing up nude, a couple of isolated body parts (vagina, breasts, buttocks) added in "landscape" format, that's it. This reduced my score by at least 8 points.
Bottom Line: Sorry, but I had to get the cons off my chest. The site is excellent for the young (I only found one model over forty!!) and for those who like Playboy type glamor (and silicone breasts) when it comes to their models.

04-14-08  12:35pm

Replies (6)
Review
48
Visit Lusty Grandmas

Lusty Grandmas
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 09-26-08  10:31am  (Update History)
Reason: Eight of the bonus sites no longer update. Main reason for downgrading: I am being flooded with Spam since I subscribed to this site.
Pros: Site sticks strictly to its niche. Plenty of real grandmas who look the part, each having at least one high quality picture set (1280x857) zipped and one very high quality video just short of HD.
Recent videos are primarily in wmv format and can be downloaded in whole in a zip file or in segments.

No DRM protection.

Download speed is fast at 1.2 MB/s.

Lusty Grandmas is part of a network. With the first month's subscription 34 other sites are now included catering to every taste. The number of bonus sites will be increased by two every additional month one subscribes while the price drops from $ 29,95 to $ 24.95 after the first month. Both are offered as a loyalty bonus. In addition two HD sites are promised down the road if one stays with Lusty Grandmas.

Amazingly enough in the light of past, bad experiences, the 34 bonus sites one receives seem to be of high quality (no time to test all) with lots of good material and not just low grade fillers to make the network look good.
Cons: The picture sets basically repeat what's on the video. They are of excellent quality but it would still be nice to have a picture set that is different from the video.

Updates come daily but I have problems with them coming in segments over a period of time. It amounts more to one update a week than a daily one, but with so many sites to pick from one never gets bored waiting for the next segment so that's a smallish "con."

Video scenarios are a bit repetitive and hard to understand at times because many of the models are Eastern Europeans whose English is not very good. Some videos even use interpreters.

That dratted security sign-in! Yep, the one that's so hard to make out in most places.

Epoch handles the subscription, which is good, but beware of a pre-checked free trial offer to another site when you sign up. You may not want it!
Bottom Line: In my efforts to get away from the perfect, powdered or oiled, fake breasted Barbies I strayed into new and unfamiliar territory but I must say that I like it because it is so dramatically different.

The models of Lusty Grandmas are not glamorous, they are not MILFs but rather the mothers of MILFs, most could not be called beautiful by any stretch of the imagination, but I like them .. a lot .. and for those of you who like glamor and glitz and nubile, you can always ignore this site and enjoy the other thirty_four.

There is a wealth of good material in them with at least a couple of sites to suit your taste.

This "mother" or should I say "grandmother" site makes it easy to sample some of the material. Go, have a look at the quality of the videos and pictures for yourself as you take their tour.

What you see is pretty well what you'll get in all (most? because I haven't looked at them all) of the sites when it comes to quality.

Another big plus I couldn't fit in above is the fact that no other sign-in but the first is required to cruise this net of sites.

03-28-08  11:49am

Replies (11)
Review
49
Visit Lacy Nylons

Lacy Nylons
(0)

79.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Models on the average are easy on the eye. Not porn star quality but not ugly either.

Site updates videos once every eight days. Not great but mentioned under the pros because other Ferro Sites are so much worse when it comes to updating.

Picture sets appear to update every two days.

Videos since 2009 (I counted 114) have been shot in HD at 1280x720p in wmv at a total bitrate of 3320kbps. Videos before that are at 640x480p.

Picture sets can be downloaded zipped, with the individual picture weighing in around 1000x1500px.
Cons: Separate sign-ins required for pictures and videos, because the username and password are generated by Ferro and therefore very convoluted, it is an impossibly aggravating extra task to have to sign in twice to every site you receive as a bonus that also contains pictures.

The huge watermarks in the bottom right hand corner as well as in the left top corner I've remarked upon in previous previews of other Ferro sites, are present here, too, and manage greatly to add to the aggravation factor. I almost didn't bother adding this site because while the technical quality of the videos isn't too bad, they are not worth looking at with that intrusive logo staring you in the face all through the video.

Picture sets are small and not very erotic.

Download and streaming are highly erratic. My downloads started at around 1MB/s, gradually reduced to 200K/s, and then see-sawed back and forth between those two values.

No proper search engine, no model directory or bio.
Bottom Line: This is a site I was prepared to love. After all, who, over fifty, does not like to see models dressed in nylons and garter belt?

And you get plenty of that in this site. For once pantyhose was not substituted in someone's mind for stockings and they stick to the old definition when it comes to nylons.

One idiosyncrasy of this site, or maybe two:

Most models start out naked and then get slowly dressed, rather than the other way around, also very few of them wear panties but walk around commando style under their lovely dresses instead.

This anachronism is jarring to an old-timer because nylons and garter belts belong to an era where no woman would have thought to get dressed without panties and slip.

Both picture sets and videos lack imagination, with the models looking stiff and uninvolved. Of course, it doesn't help that the videos are in a foreign language (Russian? Hungarian? Czech?) so you miss out on the context of the video as well.

Let me sum things up in a highly subjective way (in other words don't take every negative thing I have to say as the Gospel truth):

A. I wouldn't bother with the pictures. The quality is too uneven and the sets are too small. Plus the logo, even if it has been reduced to one only, is still too intrusive.

B. I wouldn't bother with the videos because they lack erotic heat as well as the tease factor, and on top of that they are being ruined by watermarks that are meant to protect their copyright but manage instead to aggravate purists like me who like to look at a clean picture with no, or at most, with a discrete logo.

The separate sign-in for the various sites is just plain dumb. Especially if a distinction is being made between pictures and videos requiring authorization by both.

If I judged this site, or any other Ferro site I got during this past month, for myself I wouldn't give any of them more than a 69 because I look and then throw away ... see humongous watermarks.

However because of their relatively good rate of update, plus the basically decent TECHNICAL quality of the videos, plus the fact that one monthly subscription will give you four sites eventually, I will give it a 79. Of the four Ferro sites I reviewed during the past month this site, despite its flaws, is the best.

BTW, the site is softcore with some toy play thrown in. A plus for me (the softcore part), might be a minus for others.

02-05-12  08:05pm

Replies (4)
Review
50
Visit Ladies Kiss Ladies

Ladies Kiss Ladies
(0)

79.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Some beautiful Russian Models.

+ Excellent video quality (1280 x 720, 3000 kbps, wmv) in the most recent (approx 40) updates. Very good quality in earlier clips (640 x 480) in avi. format.

+ Good picture quality at 1500 x 1000 px in latest sets.

+ Exclusive material.

+ Steady but not frequent updates.

+ Excellent download speed if downloading one file at a time.

+ Loyalty bonuses: This site is part of a network of fifty sites and one extra site can be added as a bonus every week one remains a member. The network itself is mostly about lesbianism, gay, transsexual and transvestite life styles ... even about sissies, but does contain a few straight sites. Nice sites also for lovers of pantyhose or stockings.
Cons: - All the scenes are in Russian and because much of the clips consist of lengthy conversations watching can become frustrating.
- Some scenes are passionate but many lack life.
- Cameramen should imitate North Americans when it comes to picking the right angles. Quite frequently the action is being veiled by one of the models' hair and you seldom get a clear view of what exactly she is doing.
- Picture sets can be quite meager (35 pix).
- Being asked for my password and user name too frequently when attempting to download picture sets.
- Allowed only one download at a time when using DownThemAll. Speed however reached over 3MB/s for me, so this was only a minor irritant.
- Large watermark taking up most of bottom right.
- No search tools.
Bottom Line: I am impressed with the technical quality of the latest videos and have found a few already that are keepers but there are also quite a few I deleted after only watching a few minutes because the models acted too detached and lacked true passion or the video looked like a lecture on how to use Lesbian sex toys rather than two women who were truly involved with one another.

I picked up my first bonus site when first signing on, it is called "Girls For Matures" (you can pick any of 49) but I have a hard time figuring out which one of the two is the mature one and which one is the girl! If that's any indication of what's to come then I am not exactly holding my breath for that next bonus.**

Most aggravating is that I have to give a password and user name created by them (which means it is so convoluted that it can't be remembered) every time I want to download a picture set. Things are fine for the rest of the session once I do that but next time I visit it will ask me again even though I am inside the site already.

Bottom line: There are some good clips and picture sets to be had but many are just so-so and repetitive and in a foreign language to boot.

If you don't mind the $ 30.00 price tag a one month subscription might be worth your while. The kissing can be quite passionate and arousing to male and female subscriber alike.

**Next bonus arrived. I picked "Boys Love Matures" and am forced to repeat what I wrote above. The boys are frequently men in their thirties with the mature women barely a couple of years older, so beware if you go for old-young themes. Most clips are in avi format even in the latest updates. If the bonus sites I've received so far are any indication of what the rest of the Ferro network is like then I would really advise against a subscription.

07-04-10  11:33am

Replies (2)

Shown : 26-50 of 89 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.13 seconds.