Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : messmer (137)  

Feedback:   All (2160)  |   Reviews (75)  |   Comments (238)  |   Replies (1847)

Other:   Replies Received (1284)  |   Trust Ratings (74)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 89 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
26
Visit Pornstar Network

Pornstar Network
(1)

92.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 06-29-11  04:18pm  (Update History)
Reason: Speed is generally much better than first experienced. And the longer I am with this site the more I discover its depth and how much I like it!
Pros: + 7250 DVDs, 62000 Videos (Scenes).

+ 1080p HD Videos (251 at present).

+ 59 Extra Sites.

+ Good Navigation.

+ Speed is good for me most of the time but tends to fluctuate.

+ Zipped Picture sets.
Cons: - Very unfriendly when it comes to my Firefox DTA, speed tends to be blazing at around 4MB/s but will shut down every 20 seconds or so and report a server error until I click on resume.

This forces me to stay with the download all the way. Downloads are fine with the ordinary Browser Downloader. At first I experienced much slower speeds but this must have been a fluke because now they do approach my maximum speed.

- Many videos are only available in avi, or mpg format but wmv is also available, except for the HD content which is in mp4.

- Talking about HD, I think most people would not even be aware that there is such a thing. I stumbled across them by hitting the "advanced search" link and seeing 1080p HD listed right beside the small window listing "videos" on the new page.

- Had to sign back into the site twice in the space of an hour.
Bottom Line: I like this site. It has plenty of good stuff, some of it previously unseen by me and that's unusual for what is primarily a DVD (Video) site. Especially a site so closely related to Videosz.

HD videos are of nice quality!

Their ordinary videos are not bad but could stand an upgrade. By comparison to other DVD sites and this, strangely enough, includes Videosz, they don't appear to be quite as sharp and clear.

But I am only a couple of days into my subscription so maybe I have just looked at the wrong videos so far.

It requires a bit of time to get used to the basic lay-out of the site but what's wrong with clicking a few buttons to see what's behind them.

Picture sets are generally small and taken from the beginning of a video shoot. They are, however downloadable in High Resolution at 1600x1200p size. In other words better than the general vidcaps.

All in all a good subscription at a fair price through TBP. Recommended.

06-08-11  03:04pm

Replies (8)
Review
27
Visit English MILF

English MILF
(0)

72.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 06-09-11  08:06pm  (Update History)
Reason: The longer I am in this site the more I notice its flaws. See update below:
Pros: Surprising amount of pictures and videos for a Solo Model Site

I counted approx. 150 picture sets (1024 px), 110+ movies (720x576), anywhere between 20 and forty minutes long judging by the samples I downloaded. There are over 100 shorter clips for download as well.

Vidcaps

Short sex stories containing pictures of model.

Model is a happy amateur exhibitionist (the site is run by her and her husband) and it shows.

Mostly softcore. Hardcore content is mainly role playing between husband and wife.

2 Bonus sites: Daniella Lycra Ass and Daniella in Pantyhose, great for lovers of either or both.
Cons: No streaming, but because the videos are also offered in very short 1 minute clips with pictures for those with slower speed one can get a good idea what the video contains. Still I miss being able to preview a video.

Large and very obvious watermarks.

Pictures are not offered in zipped form.

No search engine.
Bottom Line: The site is run by a Lady called Daniella English and her husband and it should be everything I hate: no zips for the pictures, large water marks, no streaming, no HD videos.

If I saw this mentioned in anyone else's review I would say, no thanks, yet there is something very appealing to this site and I confess that, despite the above mentioned shortcomings, I like it. Probably because it is not run by professionals which is a welcome switch.

Daniella has an incredible posterior - and be warned that in most videos and picture sets the emphasis is on showing off this large booty. She also has lovely big natural breasts and nipples and you truly get the feeling that she really enjoys showing off both. Those who expect a glamor model will not like this site but those who enjoy an ordinary housewife doing "rude" things for our sexual gratification will be glad they joined.

Because of the above mentioned cons I could not in clear conscience give the site a higher score but I like it nevertheless.

Update 09/06/2011: I was willing to overlook quite a few of the flaws of this site because I was so thrilled to run into a real amateur for a change but the longer I am with it the more I discover its flaws.

Many videos are too formulaic concentrating mostly on the butt of the model while there are very few prolonged frontal shots, or even shots of the English Milf's face.

Updates may be regular but are turning out to be too infrequent for my taste. Some updates (today's) could hardly be called an update at all because it consists of a very inferior series of small vidcaps.

And so, regrettably there's less to this site than I first hoped for and I am reducing my original score accordingly.

05-24-11  07:25pm

Replies (0)
Review
28
Visit Suburban Amateurs

Suburban Amateurs
(0)

82.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Beautiful British Girls who like to address you personally in dirty language .. a nice, naughty touch.

Many of the sets and videos contain models in erotic lingerie, very much a plus for me.

Softcore only with the occasional Lesbian scene mixed in.

Pictures and Videos are available for download. Picture sets are available zipped.

Regular updates, with the photo sets having the advantage.
Cons: This site has not kept up with the times. The very latest picture sets are quite nice at 2000x3000px, but the best videos are still regrettably at 720x540 wmv with a total bitrate anywhere between 1700 and 3000, and one does not have to go back very far to run into picture sets that display at only 2000px or even 1024px.

In 2007 I praised this site for the latter, now it's hopelessly outdated.

Search engine that is praiseworthy for giving one so many choices in one's search is actually quite inaccurate. Just one example, I searched for one of my niches "hairy" and got mostly "shaved" models as a result.

Normal downloads through the browser are extremely slow for me. However I got respectable speeds when downloading videos through DTA.

Cluttered home page.
Bottom Line: You have no idea how much I want to like this site. After all, who could resist British models talking dirty while getting rid of their clothes, or a set of pictures that really takes its time when it comes to stripping down to the bare essentials (well, not always bare), but two things aggravate me, a) that they have not kept up with the times when it comes to videos and b) their horribly outdated 5 bonus sites.

What makes things worse is that only one bonus site "Suburban Sluts" allows downloads while all the others contain either streaming only videos, or they are picture sites without the zip option forcing one to download each picture laboriously one by one. But even the "Suburban Sluts" videos and pictures are so outdated that no one would want to download them anyway. Their last update must have been years ago. So, forget it when it comes to bonus sites.*

*Just noticed that the two picture bonus sites update to this day. However, no zip, so useless to most unless they have the proper "tools!"

Same as last time I won`t judge this site for its bonus content but am disappointed that they have not discovered HD yet.

I will nevertheless recommend it because there are enough videos and photo sets of erotic value to be enjoyed, even though the clarity in full picture, on my monitor, is not exactly mind blowing.

And I do like girls talking dirty, especially when they wear nice lingerie! I`ll just have to get used to watch them in a smaller window where the picture is quite crisp.

Since the updates are so slow in coming I would recommend a one month subscription only.

05-24-11  02:47pm

Replies (8)
Review
29
Visit Art-Lingerie

Art-Lingerie
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 05-17-11  11:07am  (Update History)
Reason: Since this is primarily a picture site the consistent blurriness (softness) of the HR pictures forces me to downgrade my original score.
Pros: Beautiful models. Some of them very well known and sought after.

Good selection of picture sets and videos.

Pictures come in three different sizes with the biggest ones weighing in at 3000x2000. Typical set is rather small though.

Videos come in two sizes: a smaller one at 640x360p, but very crisp, and an HD one at 1280x720p.

Both sizes are very nice when it comes to clarity of the picture. Videos vary in length. Some can be as short as 3-5 minutes or as long as 11 minutes. There might be longer ones but I haven't come across them. On the other hand, if you have a solo model slowly divesting herself of her lingerie you don't really need a 30 minute video.

Pictures and Videos are downloadable with no restrictions!

Daily Updates alternating between picture and video.
Cons: The naming is horrible. A combination of numbers and letters plus the size you downloaded, that's about it. (eg. 2180-zzD-Ultra.zip) It forces you to stop and rename each and every file when it has finished downloading so that you will remember the name of the model inside the zip.

I am a picture person at heart but was disappointed with the quality of the High Resolution pictures at 3000x2000. They almost reminded me of Twisty's or Only Tease. Too much body make-up, too much air brushing, too much photo shop? Picture became way too soft because of the way it was treated.

It's presented in a size where one should be able to count every pore and hair and fold of garment on a model but in my sample sets I couldn't.

Focus was in the wrong place at times as well. But I guess that's where the "art" comes in.

I had very slow speeds when using DTA and was surprised to find that I was doing better with my ordinary Firefox downloader .. but even then I barely managed more than 500-600KB/s
Bottom Line: A very nice, user friendly site for lovers of erotic lingerie. It has the same basic lay-out as Only Tease and if you've ever been a member of that site you will know that it has to be excellent.

I liked the idea that in some sets and videos the model started out with more than just bra, panties, garter belt and stockings (sadly many of them ARE like that) but would have liked them to finish fully nude.

They don't hide anything, as opposed to OT, but be warned the site is very softcore! Don't expect spreading or masturbation or insertions, you won't find it here.

The models are very appealing to me despite their youth. I guess that touch of fine lingerie helps. Too bad about the pictures, though. I will restrict myself to downloading videos until someone decides to do away with all that powder and sharpens the pictures a bit.

It is my opinion that they built themselves a very nice site here with lots of content considering they are only a couple of years old and I would recommend it to lingerie lovers, if for nothing else than the HD videos that can be found right from their beginning in 2009. I would even recommend it to picture lovers if they don't mind that soft look!

If they renamed their zip files to something more practical like "Eufrat01HR.zip" for instance I would happily give them a higher rating because the models and lingerie are truly stunning, but the present way of naming files is annoying me no end.

04-25-11  04:05pm

Replies (2)
Review
30
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan
(1)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 04-28-11  03:10pm  (Update History)
Reason: The longer I am a member of this site the more I appreciate its qualities. Raising score by Two (2).
Pros: A large selection of very beautiful models from Europe and North America.

Impressive photography, mostly solo or g/g. Available in approx. 930x1400 px, Normal Resolution and 2200x3500 px High Resolution, zipped. Slight changes in resolution from picture to picture. Enormously large sets giving you the choice of keeping only the very best.

Most recent videos are in HD format in 720p dvx and mp4 format, as well as the extra large videos at 1080p wmv. All are downloadable!

Streaming is also available for previews or watching the whole video on-line if you so desire. Streaming picture is HD and very clear as well. I experienced no buffering problems.

Speed of download was also very good for me at 3.5 MB/s. This was for a single file through Firefox's DTA. Normal downloads through the browser downloader were much slower but still around 600 KB/s but as a plus this way of doing things seemed to allow multiple downloads.

Nice bonus material (auditions, blogs, bts etc.)
Cons: Huge picture sets will require a large amount of time to prune. I never thought I would consider a set containing approx. 300 pictures a con. Well, it isn't really - see above under pros, but some of you might be a bit more impatient when it comes to downloading or editing a 500 MB picture set so be warned.

I desperately want a search engine for this site. You practically have to go from update (arranged in chronological order) to update to find something that fits your taste.

Model directory is in alphabetical order but it would be nice if the pictures of the models contained the dates when her sets and videos were published. This would prevent the frustration of finding a beautiful model and then realize that her pictures are not High Resolution and her videos are split up into various parts .. something most of us aren't interested in nowadays unless we collect the complete works of a model.

Continued below:
Bottom Line: It would be nice to be able to go to a point where publishing HD videos and HR pictures first started and work one's way up to the present from there.

Close attention is required when looking at the updates themselves, some are an invitation to rate sets, some are bonus material from other sites, some are masturbation videos or g/g videos, some are picture sets, but there are also videos of photoshoots .. something I dislike heartily, but others might enjoy.

Because I didn't pay attention originally I downloaded a hefty HD file (g/g content) expecting hot action and found myself listening to the distracting remarks of the director as he gave his instructions for the shoot. I don't like to have my illusions destroyed. But, as I said, some might like that sort of thing.

BOTTOM LINE:

This is a well-respected, well run site that offers top quality material. I did not see one single unattractive model, I'd even take the ones they had to reject during their auditions. Most would be between 18-25 in age.

The material is shot indoors, as well as in more exotic locations. Lovers of glamorous videos and picture sets will be well pleased.

There is also the added eroticism of a bit of kink. Fisting, insertion of large objects (mostly dildos), peeing, some public exposure scenes. Good stuff for most.

I also loved the fact that I did not come across one single pair of enhanced breasts. They MIGHT be there but I didn't come across them. This is so refreshing when compared to most sites!

I am adding my usual plaint, and yes, all of you who know me knew it would come:

I wish they featured some mature women, and I wish that their models would wear more than the bare necessities. Sometimes the girls don't even wear those, because I very seldom came across a bra or even a pair of panties during many of my spot checks of the picture sets and videos, but then I shouldn't go to a site like this one and expect it to be something it wasn't meant to be.

You can't expect to find cougars in a cubs' playpen.

After all this site is not meant for lovers of a leisurely strip by mature women but for those who revel in beautiful young, glistening bodies, and for them ALS SCAN does its job very well.

04-24-11  09:55am

Replies (26)
Review
31
Visit Daily Sex Dose

Daily Sex Dose
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Daily updates as name implies.

Beautiful models, Eve Angel and Sophie Moone among them.

Quality pictures available in 853x1280 as well as in large at 2246x3370px. Picture sets can be quite large. Sample set contained 188 photos.

Videos available in various formats. I especially like to have the choice of HD videos. They are available at 1280x720px 4596 kbps wmv format as well as in 1920x1080px in wmv and mp4.

Downloads were extremely fast for me at 3.5 MB/s when using DTA (Firefox).

Part of the 21Sextury Network.
Cons: Mostly solo sets, something that appeals to me but others might like something a bit harder.

There are only 4 GG and 2 BG among 53 scenes.

My usual complaint (but not reflected in the score) the girls get nude and down to business too quickly. Again others might enjoy exactly that but I find I get bored very easily if masturbation or any sort of sexual activity goes on too long. I would prefer a slower lead-in to the action and a bit more lingerie on the ladies.
Bottom Line: Another quality site by 21Sextury.

At the moment they only have 53 scenes and matching photo sets, but with their daily updates they should grow rapidly.

However it is my feeling that they should vary the solos a bit more because one's boredom threshold could be reached very quickly.

Photography and videography are outstanding as usual, but you will pay for the quality with having to download extremely large files.

If you like a more softcore site among the many offered by 21Sextury this might be the one for you.

In any case membership does include quite a few bonus sites ( I got 47 for a one year subscription) but there's a respectable number of them even for the short term subscriber.

Another bonus is that the price will reduce from month to month so you can't really go wrong on this one. Recommended.

02-21-11  06:57pm

Replies (2)
Review
32
Visit Petites Parisiennes

Petites Parisiennes
(1)

78.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 05-09-11  03:23pm  (Update History)
Reason: Upped to original score because refund was promptly issued after a Billing France mistake.
Pros: 59 models by my count, (I might be off by a couple) who are generally quite appealing. Most have at least seven picture sets and 6 - 8 videos.

HD videos being offered at 720p and 1080p.

Picture sets being offered zipped at 1000, 2000 and 4000px.

Multiple downloads possible.

Detailed search, once you have figured it out, allowing you to search by every possible criterion, from body shape to setting of shoot and everything in between.

Original concepts in some shoots.

Regular daily updates alternating between picture sets and videos.
Cons: I hate to say it but I found most of the sets very bland, and even those containing lingerie were far from what I expected from the camera of a lingerie fetishist.

Many of the shoots are ill-lit, greyish in tone or too soft. (See Anais update, January 11, this one was definitely not ready for prime time unless the photographer was being artistic.) The wrong color is often used in the studio shoots. One model who was shot in front of a blue background looks ghastly, like a drowning victim.

The same question might be asked when it comes to focus. Is the photographer doing it for artistic effect or is it a mistake that the head of the model is blurred while the genitals are in sharp focus, and vice versa. One sample set even contained a foot in focus while everything around it was blurred. Affectation or artistry?

Many of the 4000px photo shoots I downloaded lacked detail and looked more like enlargements than Ultra High Resolution.

Videos are only between 2 and five minutes long.
Bottom Line: Okay, I could have kept on going about many of the videos being nothing but an actual photo shoot being filmed, or that most picture sets look more like screen caps when it comes to composition and positioning of the models, or that the navigation is highly confusing to the newbie, or that the file naming could be improved, but I think you get the point by now that I liked very little about this site.

I also believe it is in search of an identity:

There is artistic nude modeling, there are outdoors, exhibitionist shoots, there is lingerie etc.

I would say there are eight different categories in all, because most models have that many sets, all with a different motif from the others.

This would make it awfully hard for anyone, no matter what their taste, to like this site for very long because with only 50+ models one can download one's personal niche in a day or two.

Of course if you are less discriminating than I and like every setting, or if you tend to download models rather than themes, then you would be fine for the month.

I did like a lingerie set or two (talking about my own niche) but even there I was greatly disappointed. A flimsy wrap or nylons and garter belt in a handful of pictures does not an erotic set make.

Especially if so many pictures of the short sets (60 - 90 pics approx.) are out of focus in important places.

I did like the originality of having some models start out nude and then get dressed in their finery, rather than the other way around.

I also enjoyed the way their short interviews were conducted (4 - 5 minutes) by giving the model a handful of cards with questions on them and they could reply, or not, if they felt like it. No pressure put on, no offensive questions by the interviewer .. a nice change.

A change of a different kind: one model even confessed that she wasn't all that keen on sex. Her honesty is to be admired but doesn't exactly get the juices flowing.

Bottom Line:

I would say this is a softcore site for the artistically inclined, because all of that "softness" and out of focus material MUST have been shot that way intentionally (see the site's Forum for the exquisite equipment used by the photographer) and would appeal to a special, more refined taste than mine.

I really hate to say this (thinking of my good friend's review below) but I got more good material out of the sites I like to complain about than out of this one, and wish once again that I could give away a membership that others who like experimental photography might enjoy more than I do.

Added on the second last day of my subscription to this site (Feb. 20):

If you like crisp, clear, well-lit pictures with natural flesh colors do not waste your money on this site because you won't find them here.

The models are pretty but could look a lot prettier in someone else's hands. Subjective, I know, that's why I am really looking forward to some future review(s) to see how far off I was in my assessment.

01-24-11  10:48am

Replies (10)
Review
33
Visit Karup's Older Women

Karup's Older Women
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 01-28-11  11:08am  (Update History)
Reason: Original score restored. See remarks below and also under comments.
Pros: A huge archive of mature, attractive models.

Picture sets: Older sets display at 1024x680 px, not bad if they are all like the sample set, dated 2005, that I test-downloaded. Newer sets are at 1500x1001px.

Latest videos are in HD at 1280x720, total bitrate close to 4000 kbps. Nice! I could not quite determine when either pictures or videos changed to a higher resolution but it cannot have been too long ago because even early 2010 videos are in 640x480 at 2000 kbps. However it must be stressed that they, as well, are of good quality and quite crisp if one does not insist on watching them full screen.

Excellent search engine.

Excellent basic home page lay out, even though it looks a bit dated, but it makes it very easy to find one's way around.
Cons: Bonus pictures and feeds: Bonus picture sets are from AllOver30 and Anilos. It would be nice if they could be downloaded zipped and in their best resolution. Many of us simply don't feel like downloading a set, one picture at a time.

The bonus "feeds" are even more disappointing because they consist of 1 minute clips of various DVDs only, and are further ruined by a logo running across the picture. Karups would do better not to offer bonuses that aren't really bonuses.

However, in all fairness, one of the bonuses, KarupsPC Content, is a nice little gift because the picture sets are zipped and the quality itself is fine even though they date back to 2005.

Search engine, as much as I like it, should have the additional function of filtering HD content and High Res Picture sets. Many users are no longer content with less than HD quality and don't like to sift through all the updates and models to find what they want.

Too many enhanced breasts.

Cons continued below:
Bottom Line: The term older does not really fit because most models would be called MILFS or Cougars or Mature in other places. There is only a handful of models over 50 and only one over 60.


Bottom Line:

A nice, solid, quality site for lovers of mature women. So far it does not live up to my personal expectations because my preferred niche is erotic lingerie, while most models that are found under "Lingerie" or "Panties" in their advanced search appear to wear daily ho-hum "underwear" that is practical rather than arousing.

Experience has taught me that my taste is not necessarily the generally accepted one so I won't hold this against the site.

I have also found a few videos and picture sets that do come a bit closer to what I want in the short time I have been with this site, so who knows, maybe between the updates and the site's vast store of material I'll be able to dig out a few more erotic nuggets during my month of membership.

Edited Jan. 28, 2011

I received a notice yesterday informing me that my subscription had expired despite the fact that I have still three weeks to go. Access was cut off immediately and two emails to support to correct the situation brought no response. It is impossible to get in touch with their Billing Company because the only link provided is that of KarupsOW support. Because support, when needed, plays such an important part I have downgraded my review by five points.

Edit: Score restored to its original because I got a response to my 3rd email informing me of a glitch in their system and their efforts to correct it. Additional days have been promised for every day lost now.

01-20-11  01:19pm

Replies (6)
Review
34
Visit We Are Hairy

We Are Hairy
(1)

99.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +Friendly, involved and supportive Webmaster.
+Amazing models, amazing quality.
+Excellent growth since my last review. I counted 134 models today who, on the average, posed for seven to eight sets and videos. Not shabby for a site a year old. Growth has accelerated even more since Nov. 11, 2010, when the site decided on three updates a day, seven days a week.
+Now includes downloads for portables.
+All videos, except for a very few are of HD quality at 1280x720 at 5000 kbps. Videos are available in various formats, HD MP4, HD WMV, DVD MP4, DVD WMV plus iPOD/iPHONE MP4.
+Picture sets are available zipped in Standard Resolution (1024), High Resolution (1600) and Super High Resolution (3000+). Custom zip available.
+Excellent HD streaming of videos.
+Excellent search. Search by category or hone in on something that meets your taste exactly, it's all there.
+Allows you to filter out themes you don't care for, has a voting system, allows for comments good and bad, has a forum. Continued:
Cons: Super High Speed for me (anywhere from 2.5 MB/s to 3 MB/s.

*********************************************

Can't find one darn thing wrong with the site, except that | would like to see every model come wrapped in erotic lingerie but seeing that someone else expressed their distaste of all those lingerie sets in a comment .. we must give Kudos to the Webmaster for looking after his strange taste as well! :-) Just kidding, friend!
Bottom Line: I love this site. So far as I am concerned they started with the intention of making theirs the best hairy site possible and have added enough bells and whistles in the year they have been in existence that they achieved top dog position in this short time.

I would have given a hundred but I'm still smarting from that one non-confidence vote I got last time I gushed over a site. :-)

Highly recommended to all hairy fans. You are getting the best in the niche.

12-05-10  04:11pm

Replies (8)
Review
35
Visit Vintage Flash

Vintage Flash
(0)

82.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 12-06-10  09:43am  (Update History)
Reason: Score adjusted upward because complaint about slow speeds appears to have been an abberation rather than the rule.
Pros: Great looking British models.

Sexy vintage lingerie. Latest videos and picture sets are of good quality. Videos at present come in at 1280 x 720 px at 5000 kbps. Picture sets are of good quality as well and are available in zipped format.

Content not overwhelming but 470 Picture Sets and 244 Videos (many of the older ones are, of course, of lesser quality) isn't too bad either.

Love British accents.

Additional three bonus sites.
Cons: Site does not allow you to stop and then resume a download.

Not download manager friendly. My trusty DownThemAll gave me the same speed as the regular browser downloader.

Awful, inadequate search engine. I saw one picture on the tour and it was this picture that enticed me to subscribe. Do you think I can find that set? Rhetorical question! I suppose I will before the month is up.

Only one update every five days.

The three bonus sites do not offer a great deal of content.

Access to bonus sites requires a separate sign-in.
Bottom Line: Despite some of the negatives a nice site.

The few videos I downloaded yesterday were great. Lovely vintage lingerie (full size panties, nylons and garter belts, girdles, bras etc.) I am looking forward to downloading quite a bit more of their great videos (at least the newer ones) because just about every one of them looks tempting. The "dirty" talk by the models doesn't hurt either!

The three bonus sites "Pantyhosed4U" (305 photo sets, 138 videos), "VFAcademy" (69 photo sets, 70 videos), and "VintageFlash.Archives" (236 photo sets, 1 video!) are nice to have but aren't big enough, or update often enough, to make subscription to this site worthwhile for more than one month.

I like the mother site (reviewed), it does have its flaws but at least, for once, I don't have to condemn a site out of hand which is refreshing.

Recommended to fans of vintage lingerie and British models.

12-05-10  01:40pm

Replies (14)
Review
36
Visit Amazing Grannies

Amazing Grannies
(0)

50.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of pictures

Allows search by ethnic groups, sexual activities (Hardcore, Lesbians, Solo), amateur etc.
Cons: I won't dignify this site with a long review because I took two looks, downloaded some samples from each site on the "network" and decided never to go back.

Amazing Grannies offered some potentially nice pictures but they cannot be zipped. None of the models featured on their tour could be found. Most are much younger than "Grannies."

Videos were so so in quality. The bonus sites "Hairy Pussy Cuties,"Vintage Cuties," "Home Made Junk" were horribly outdated. In Hairy Pussy Cuties, as one example, there is also the effort to deceive the customer: five updates are listed as having been added on November 29, 2010 but those updates all consist of pictures with dimensions 800x600 and lead me to assume that the sets are old and have just been given a new date to make it look as if the site is still active. The site news had its last entry in 2006!! Vintage Cuties is of horrendous quality. I realize these sets are old but there is always Photoshop to bring the best out of vintage pictures.
Bottom Line: All four are utter garbage sites. Amazing Grannies as a stand alone site might get a sixty from me if the picture sets could be zipped but I am not in the mood to download pictures one by one even if the set only contains about 30 pictures. Email to support re. zips only brought deafening silence.

Oh, yeah, almost forgot to mention, communication between the various sites is slower than cold molasses. Downloads from every site but Amazing Grannies was around 70 KB/s.

Avoid like the plague. This is another case where I wish I could give my subscription away to someone else because, after only two days, I ain't goin' back!

Minor addition:

One other thing I forgot to mention, they gave me a choice of billers. Both CCBill and Epoch are listed as alternates but no longer do business with this site because I was kicked over to Segpay when I tried to pay through either! That tells the whole story right there!

12-03-10  10:43am

Replies (4)
Review
37
Visit Skin Video

Skin Video
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Tons of clips and videos.

Good search with great choices to narrow the field to what you are looking for.

Good Price.
Cons: Clips in HD (1280 x 720 3100 kbps) and in lesser resolution (720 x 480 2100 kbps) are not up to net standards even though the technical details say they should be.

I found it quite easy to do a side by side comparison of the HD material because it was sitting on my hard drive already, downloaded from another site. I did not expect exclusive material but HD clips from one extraneous site only, and that for a premium price?

Despite the fact that there is a large amount of material subscribers should be aware that clips can range anywhere from 3 minutes to 30+ minutes.

Updates may come with regularity but consist of clips rather than DVDs. You always take a gamble with the updates themselves because the streaming is of terrible quality. I have yet to watch a streaming clip (HD excepted) where the picture isn't blurry and one has to wait until one has finished downloading a clip to see what the quality is really like. Cont'd below:
Bottom Line: There is no consistency when it comes to the date the latest clip was produced either. One would expect that a brand new update means a fairly recent production date but that is seldom the case.

Download speed varies wildly. I got only one fifth of my normal speed with this site and on the "old" site the speed was ridiculous at something like 64 KB/s.

The layout of the home page looks cluttered and confusing.

Clips are not exclusive. This is something to be expected, so I won't count this when it comes to the score.

Bottom line: Not one of the better Video sites in my estimation. If one counted all the clips added to the site during the average day it would amount to no more than a full DVD, or DVD and-a-half!

I did find some niche content I hadn't seen before but there's not too much of it in any of the niches that lie outside the mainstream.

This site made me regret the join from the moment I first logged in. Not only is the quality not very good but there is something outdated and "off" about it. Other video/DVD sites have advanced way past what this site has to offer.

Not a pleasant experience and I am really sorry I took the three months offer because of the HD content. I swore in the past I would never do that again but the price sounded so right! Sigh, not recommended.

11-30-10  03:29pm

Replies (2)
Review
38
Visit 40 Something Mag

40 Something Mag
(0)

62.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Large and exclusive amount of content.

Mostly attractive models.

Good picture quality ... however ...
Cons: ... let me start with the biggest con. Pictures should be their strength. That's what the magazine is all about however they manage to ruin every single set (latest ones zipped and around 1600px) with an oversized, intrusive, aggravating watermark that's been placed in the wrong spot. So for many collectors pictures are out.

As to the videos, they are woeful, with the newest ones in 640x360 wmv format with a total bitrate between 1500 and 2500. Older ones are even tinier in 320x240 mpg format. I had to get my info re. the latter by taking a peak at TBPs review because, as the previous reviewer stated, my browser crashed every time I attempted to download an older video.

Homepage is hopelessly cluttered with sales offers and other extraneous material. Preview pictures of recent updates are ridiculously tiny.

Way too much hardcore material. This might be a plus for some but with the material coming from a magazine this disappointed me, personally.
Bottom Line: I didn't check my personal statistics but this must be the lowest rating I've ever given anyone.

I see no redeeming value in this site because between picture sets that are being ruined by the watermark, and videos that are only available in yesterday's outdated quality, plus the browser crashes, as well as the crass and obvious attempts to make some extra sales to their members there's absolutely nothing for me here.

I had always had my quarrels with these folks about the watermarks (see my previous comments) but was tempted to subscribe because sister sites 50plus MILF and 60plus MILF finally gave me some lingerie I liked and I was hoping for the same here, at least in the videos.

A bitter disappointment and waste of my money.

11-06-10  10:33am

Replies (6)
Review
39
Visit Old Young Lesbian Love

Old Young Lesbian Love
(0)

82.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: True to its Lesbian Theme.

Original contents with mostly attractive elderly and young ladies.

Updates regularly.

Excellent quality in newer videos, going as high as 1920 x 1080p in wmv and h264 format, with a total bitrate of over 8000 kbps.

Excellent picture quality, now in High Resolution
4288 x 2848px. The sets usually follow the action of the video but are NOT vidcaps. There are also many solo shots of the individual models included.

Excellent download speed for me at 3.5 MB/s.

Part of a large network (21Sextury).
Cons: At present only 55 scenes are listed. The site was established in May 2010 and while updates are regular they come only once a week.

Only 62 models, young and old.

Some of the older scenes listed in this site were originally published in "Lusty Grandmas."
Bottom Line: Quite frankly I am enjoying sites like these with its mature ladies who would not win a beauty contest but give me the feeling instead that they could be my elderly neighbor next door. Anyone who likes glamor and glitz would not enjoy this site. Anyone for whom forty years old is ancient, might as well stay away but I enjoy the company of my peers!

In the past I had taken 21Sextury to task for being so neglectful when it came to their sites that featured very mature women, because most hadn't been updated in years, which left me with only "Lusty Grandmas."

But now I am willing to give this site a score over 80, not only for its quality material, but also as a thank you to 21Sextury for adding it to my line up of sites.

The "Lusty Grandmas" are glad to finally have company.

11-01-10  03:26pm

Replies (3)
Review
40
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(10)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Updated: 01-02-11  11:33am  (Update History)
Reason: Too many errors that take too long to be corrected in updates. Tech support too hard to reach!
Pros: 45 Sites, many catering to lovers of glamorous Eastern European models. Available right away to long term subscribers.

Excellent quality in pictures and videos. HD in different formats available for download.

No DRM

No Download limit.

Excellent download speed for me (3.5 MB/s) when downloading single files. Good download speed when downloading more than one.

Good search engine.

Good price, reducing as you go along. I subscribed long term and got a really good deal.
Cons: New updates are often buggy.

Many dead or dormant sites. I counted about 17 if my memory serves me right.

Sites with more extreme content have been tamed down.
Bottom Line: I tell you, this is the most objective score I have ever given because the vast majority of the content does not appeal to me because my niches are the unusual, the more extreme, ladies at an age that would be considered by most "over the hill," anything that is as far removed from glamor as one can get, yet most sites of this network cater exactly to the glamor part while many of my sites have been allowed to bite the dust.

Usually one's personal prejudices will creep in, knowingly or not, but this time I am attempting to speak for the vast majority (putting myself in their shoes for once) when I say that this site deserves a 90, up from the 80 I gave it previously, since they finally gave their long term subscribers five of their new sites.

A 90 is also well-deserved because most models and scenes and sites that still update regularly will be a delight to connoisseurs of feminine beauty and the excellent quality is certainly there .. so, while I keep looking for my unusual and most likely unappealing sites to most, I will highly recommend this one to the large majority of porn lovers who have better taste than mine and who will happily find a home here.

10-29-10  11:28am

Replies (4)
Review
41
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(2)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 10-28-10  07:49pm  (Update History)
Reason: Nope, just couldn't leave the score at 80. I tried to be objective but over 10 days with 8 picture updates a day I have downloaded ONE picture set!
Pros: Huge number of models and pictures.

Picture (around 1600x1065px) files can now be downloaded in one zip file.

Large daily updates.

Fast downloads for me.

Good search engine that really allows you to narrow down your choices.
Cons: I complained about this in my last review: Too little imagination shown by many photographers.

One of them uses the same dress and underwear on too many models. One striped dress in particular should be retired for good because I've seen it on at least four different models over the years.

Greater attention should be shown to the temperature of a picture set. Some are way too warm (too much color, too much of a yellowish, orange tinge).

Quality of models seems to be deteriorating with too many heavily tattooed and pierced ladies on the pay roll. Introduction of hardcore material has not done the site any good either. This was not taken into consideration when scoring because many like hardcore and consider this a plus.

I still don't like the present set-up when it comes to up-dates. To a newcomer it must be very confusing to see previous updates in numbered "volumes."

Videos have improved SOME (854x480px, 2149 TB) but still fall short in days where HD has become standard
Bottom Line: I adjusted my score upward from the 75 I gave this site in my last review because I have already found some quite well done sets of beautiful hairy ladies in my first few days back with this site and with the large daily updates I expect to see enough worthwhile material to make my month's subscription a good deal.

Nov. 13, 2010:

However, now I am forced to downgrade even more because the quality of the updates is truly appalling. The models are lacking, with too many sporting tattoos, piercings, scars etc., the photography, as mentioned above, is consistently dull.

My take is that ATK Natural and Hairy is on its way out and is making a last ditch effort to keep or build its subscriber base by throwing 8 picture updates plus two videos a day at the consumer. This will be fine, of course, by those who like to rip a site but to the discriminating collector the present ATK is a disaster.

Just to show I am not being too subjective: I just counted the past thirteen updates containing 104 picture sets and only five of them were voted as "hot" by the subscribers!

Folks are fed up and it's obvious by the score they give the sets.

10-18-10  07:25pm

Replies (10)
Review
42
Visit Only Tease

Only Tease
(0)

72.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 10-19-10  10:50am  (Update History)
Reason: This site is starting to seriously annoy me. Today's video update was at an unacceptable 640x480px at 1469 total bitrate. Lousy picture!
Pros: At present 657 models, 913.663 images and 1854 videos according to their tour .. that's a lot.

Mostly beautiful girls. Sexy lingerie and hosiery.

Frequent updates.

Excellent picture quality offered in three different resolutions (largest 2000x3000px).

Zipped downloads.

Easy navigation and elaborate search engine.

Most recent videos are in 720p HD with a bitrate over 10000.
Cons: The most disappointing con: I found a real sexy model with tons of picture sets and videos and her most recent video, published as recently as August 2010, is in 640x480 AVI format (approx 50MB) and of horrible quality.

In general the older videos, and you don't have to go back far, are just terrible. I have watched plenty of videos with the same technical specifications on other sites that were much better in clarity and quality.

Catering to a younger crowd only. There are tons of picture sets featuring thongs and stay ups but very few featuring full back panties or camisoles etc. There is not one mature face in the crowd.

Picture sets in general spend too much time on the fully clothed.
Bottom Line: Quite frankly the eighty I gave this site is for the technical quality of its picture sets and for its elaborate search features.

The high resolution picture sets are great even though most did not appeal to me because they are too "young" for my taste when it comes to lingerie. See above.

I am managing to get my money's worth from the recent HD movies because, even though they might not exactly feature the lingerie I was craving to see, I love the girls and their British accents!

A good tease only site for softcore lovers, especially younger ones who grew up with thongs and stay-ups and pantyhose. For me it is a disappointment. Too bad I really had high hopes!

10-18-10  01:39pm

Replies (6)
Review
43
Visit Old Pussy Exam

Old Pussy Exam
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: True to niche (Gynecological Exams of older women).

Exclusive contents.

All videos in HD at 720p.

Large picture sets (over 300 not unusual) usually around 2000 px with zip download available.

Super fast download speed for me through Firefox when downloading videos one at a time. (3.5MB/s)
Cons: Not download manager friendly.

Daily download limit of 20 GB.

Contents still small with 29 models and 58 videos as well as 58 picture sets.

Updates only weekly, usually alternating between video and picture set.

Quality of HD movies and pictures could stand a bit of a boost in my opinion. The movies all seem a bit too bright (details in whites, like coats or panties, hard to make out because of this) and not quite as crisp as one would expect from 720p.

Pictures as well are not quite as sharp as one would expect with 2000px. Rather than true high resolution pictures they look more like enlargements. However I have been spoiled by sites where one could make out every pore on a models skin so it could be that I am a bit too demanding when it comes to the video and picture quality of this site. Compare TBPs review to mine and maybe the truth lies somewhere in-between.

Some of the models could still fall under the MILF category (a plus for many, I'm sure).
Bottom Line: Just to give you a bit more of a feel for the site. All models have two videos and two picture sets. One video and picture set is called "Naughty Nurse" (Solo) and another video and picture set is of the "examination" itself.

Nurses' uniforms tend to be be either tacky or inadequate (a simple hospital shirt). Because I'm not interested in uniforms this leaves half of the contents of little interest to me. You might like it.

There are further problems for me. I love older women and I get them on this site but the whole thing gets stale in an awful hurry, with the same "office," the same "doctor" and elderly, mostly BBW (and I like chubby) women who wear bikini or thongs style panties that would look good on younger women but get too often hidden by drooping bellies (again nothing wrong with that in my eyes), not only that but the models tend to get undressed in an awful hurry as well.

The procedure after that is strictly Gynecology 101 with probably some actions on the part of the doctor (recommendation of a dildo for therapy, as one example) that would be frowned upon by the College of Physicians and Surgeons, I am sure.

There is no hard core action unless extreme vaginal gaping or use of a dildo is considered hard core.

This is not a minus for me, but the sameness of each video and picture set will leave you bored after a very short time.

I am two days into this site and after having looked at five different videos (approx. length 20 minutes) the joy of discovering something new and different is already starting to evaporate.

Mildly recommended to lovers of gynecological prolonged close ups and nurses' uniforms, but that's about it.

10-17-10  11:12am

Replies (2)
Review
44
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(3)

88.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Big network with sites that cater to most main stream niches.

Daily updates to varying sites. Update calendar is provided.

Excellent video quality even in the lower resolutions. Introduction of 1080p HD downloadable videos a week ago.

Excellent download speed. A huge plus with the new large HD files.

Videos with a lead-in rather than just action from the very beginning.

The price is right.
Cons: Files could be smaller? An average 1080p video can be 2-4 GB.

No "official" provision for downloading 1024 x 576px, 3036 total bitrate material offered in streaming as HD. The choice is between the smaller non-HD file and the really big (1080p) one.

Intolerance of criticism. One of the recent updates had been offered before under the same name, same model .. same everything and two comments critical of this practice were removed by RK moderators twice.
Bottom Line: There have been many excellent reviews going into the technical details of this site so I thought I'd offer my personal experiences with this site rather than all the details. For details re. picture quality and resolution, for instance, please consult reviews below.

I find this network rather refreshing and on top of my list because the video quality is excellent. A small tip (and I think it must be okay with the site or they wouldn't allow it): if you really wish to download the streaming intermediary, 1024 x 576, 3036 total bitrate size (marked HD) files this can be done through an add on to Firefox called "Flash and Video Download" or possibly through your RealPlayer movies downloader.

I just wish they would make it easier on us by adding it to the downloadable material listed to the right of the videos. I also find the smaller mpeg (mp4) files generally crisper than wmv. So if you have a slow download speed you will nevertheless find the smallest sized video quite acceptable if you pick mp4. Quality is certainly better than that found on most DVD sites.

I also like the fact that natural breasts beat enhanceds hands down. Exotics4me lists them as 85% natural and 15% enhanced. So far I have found nothing to contradict his estimate.

I love the fact that every video starts with a lead-in, sometimes it's the "hunt" for a model, sometimes there's a bit of a story but it is a refreshing change from Gonzo.

All in all an excellent site that would have rated 90+ with me if it hadn't been for the fact that the site moderator twice removed my comment referring to the fact that one of the updates was a "re-run!"

10-10-10  11:07am

Replies (8)
Review
45
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Over 8750 titles available as of today.

Five daily updates.

Excellent streaming.

Excellent download speed.

Reasonable price.
Cons: Search is horrible, eg. search under "old" or "grannies" and you will get listings featuring teens etc.

Most videos are grade B or worse.

Not enough variety from one update to the other, it is mostly Gonzo style Porn that starts with the action rather than with a lead-in. Checking any given daily update shows a monotonous sameness among the five DVDs.

Much Niche content is under-represented .. see monotonous sameness!

Deception in many DVDs. Sometimes compilations are offered that only have one or two scenes that actually represent the action promised by the title. This goes for other DVD sites as well.

Talking about titles and deception, frequently teens aren't teens and MILFs aren't MILFs. This would be the producers' fault rather than that of Videobox but they could be more discriminating when it comes to choosing the titles they will purchase, so they must bear part of the blame.

Too many videos are blurred (soft rather than crisp) .. see Grade B videos.
Bottom Line: Just like others I have to stress that this is not the first time I subscribe to this site and the obvious conclusion is that there must be something that keeps bringing me back. Sometimes I do wonder why, but still and all I would encourage anyone who is new to porn to subscribe.
They will find a wealth of scenes they will like.

For a newcomer there is even some nice niche material (hair, pregnant, mature, peeing, BDSM, transsexuals) they can download if they are interested in the off-beat.

However, for anyone who has been a member on and off over the years the neglect of niches when it comes to the daily updates is regrettable and has to reduce the ratings given by them. That's why a newbie might give a 99 while I'm giving a 75. In my mind no higher score is justified at the moment.

Together, newbies and veterans might give this site an average score that better represents its value than the 95 given by TBP.

And, yes, down the road I'll probably subscribe again!

10-09-10  10:23am

Replies (3)
Review
46
Visit 50Plus MILFs

50Plus MILFs
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: True to the niche. All models are over fifty and most are quite attractive to those of us who like mature women. Models seem to be genuinely enjoying themselves.

Videos available for streaming and download at HD quality at both 720p and 1280p

Excellent streaming at 720p.

Downloads were generally quick for me.

Photo sets come in medium and large sizes, zipped. Large is usually around 1500 px but fluctuates, even within the sets.
Cons: Picture sets are relatively small, 35 - 50 pictures per set in the ones I tested. As in its sister site 40somethingmagazine the watermarks are too garish and huge and tend to spoil the picture.

Watermarks are also quite prominent in the videos but because they take up less of the screen they are easier on the eye.

Download speed was erratic. Some videos downloaded at 1.8 MB/s (single download through DTA) while others barely reached 600 KB/s.

Only one download at a time when using DTA through Firefox. Much slower speed when using regular Browser downloader.

Still a relatively small site with 49 models.

Videos and Picture sets only update once a week, which might not be a bad thing since attractive 50+ models are few and far between and the chance is always there that the quality gets watered down.

Navigation is simple but nevertheless takes a bit of getting used to.
Bottom Line: I love this site and it would have rated well in the nineties if it hadn't been for those accursed big watermarks and the fact that it is still a relatively small site.

The quality of the videos and pictures is excellent. The ladies are confident and at ease with their bodies and sexuality and appear to be having fun at the shoots. I especially enjoy the interviews because it makes the scenes the models appear in later on more "intimate" for some reason.

I would highly recommend this site, for a month, to lovers of truly older women.

07-06-10  11:38am

Replies (12)
Review
47
Visit Ladies Kiss Ladies

Ladies Kiss Ladies
(0)

79.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Some beautiful Russian Models.

+ Excellent video quality (1280 x 720, 3000 kbps, wmv) in the most recent (approx 40) updates. Very good quality in earlier clips (640 x 480) in avi. format.

+ Good picture quality at 1500 x 1000 px in latest sets.

+ Exclusive material.

+ Steady but not frequent updates.

+ Excellent download speed if downloading one file at a time.

+ Loyalty bonuses: This site is part of a network of fifty sites and one extra site can be added as a bonus every week one remains a member. The network itself is mostly about lesbianism, gay, transsexual and transvestite life styles ... even about sissies, but does contain a few straight sites. Nice sites also for lovers of pantyhose or stockings.
Cons: - All the scenes are in Russian and because much of the clips consist of lengthy conversations watching can become frustrating.
- Some scenes are passionate but many lack life.
- Cameramen should imitate North Americans when it comes to picking the right angles. Quite frequently the action is being veiled by one of the models' hair and you seldom get a clear view of what exactly she is doing.
- Picture sets can be quite meager (35 pix).
- Being asked for my password and user name too frequently when attempting to download picture sets.
- Allowed only one download at a time when using DownThemAll. Speed however reached over 3MB/s for me, so this was only a minor irritant.
- Large watermark taking up most of bottom right.
- No search tools.
Bottom Line: I am impressed with the technical quality of the latest videos and have found a few already that are keepers but there are also quite a few I deleted after only watching a few minutes because the models acted too detached and lacked true passion or the video looked like a lecture on how to use Lesbian sex toys rather than two women who were truly involved with one another.

I picked up my first bonus site when first signing on, it is called "Girls For Matures" (you can pick any of 49) but I have a hard time figuring out which one of the two is the mature one and which one is the girl! If that's any indication of what's to come then I am not exactly holding my breath for that next bonus.**

Most aggravating is that I have to give a password and user name created by them (which means it is so convoluted that it can't be remembered) every time I want to download a picture set. Things are fine for the rest of the session once I do that but next time I visit it will ask me again even though I am inside the site already.

Bottom line: There are some good clips and picture sets to be had but many are just so-so and repetitive and in a foreign language to boot.

If you don't mind the $ 30.00 price tag a one month subscription might be worth your while. The kissing can be quite passionate and arousing to male and female subscriber alike.

**Next bonus arrived. I picked "Boys Love Matures" and am forced to repeat what I wrote above. The boys are frequently men in their thirties with the mature women barely a couple of years older, so beware if you go for old-young themes. Most clips are in avi format even in the latest updates. If the bonus sites I've received so far are any indication of what the rest of the Ferro network is like then I would really advise against a subscription.

07-04-10  11:33am

Replies (2)
Rating
48
Visit In The Crack

In The Crack
(1)

88.0
No Review.
06-14-10  10:13am

Review
49
Visit Aunt Judy's

Aunt Judy's
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A plentiful amount of models or varying ages and looks now that AJ and Older Women have been combined.

Picture sets are HR, 2000 pixels on the long side, zipped.

A movies only section is also part of the deal.

Updates appear to be regular.

Speed was fairly good for me. All you need for, what is basically, a photo site.
Cons: Very awkward way of naming their sets.

No true Hi-Res pictures.

Movies are a disgrace.

Site navigation and viewing are unnecessarily complicated.

Navigation is sticky.

Most photo sets are uninspired.
Bottom Line: Well, they did it to me again. I got a special Memorial Day offer that took ten dollars off their regular price for one month and, as a lover of mature women, how could I resist, despite previous vows never to subscribe again. What can I say? Hope does spring eternal in the human breast! Maybe they improved in the meantime?

This site is still basically second rate when compared to other mature sites. The 2000 pixels long side sets lack the crispness and the ability to count every pore, every hair on a model that is found on just about every other picture site these days. Here, the pictures seem basically enlargements, and that's it.

The naming of the picture sets itself is very awkward and it is incomprehensible to me why they would do things this way.

Let's say you find a favorite model and want to download all of her sets. Well, they are all named Eve.zip (example only).

Your computer will most likely make sure that they are re-named Eve (1).zip, Eve (2). zip etc. however every picture within every set is named exactly the same. Why would they do that? This requires a lot of renaming, and if you ever make the mistake of unzipping all of them at the same time you will find yourself with an unholy mess.

The whole set-up is awkward and hard to navigate. Seeing that Aunt Judys, Older Women and Older Women movies are now one "super site" why not have everything in one spot and just keep listing the various niches.

Want to look at the high res version of a picture in a set? First click on thumbnail of model, then click on thumbnail of the picture you want to look at, within the set. This gives you the small version of the picture you want to study in detail. Now click on that and a new window opens with another small picture you have to click on in order to finally get your so-called HI-RES 2000 pixels long version. So many unnecessary steps.

But I would forgive them for every one of their attempts to make it harder for me to navigate and view, if only their picture sets were not so incredibly stiff, lifeless, unimaginative, dull, inept.

As usual, there are exceptions to the rule, but generally speaking their stable of photographers should be fired wholesale.

The movies are a farce. I cannot find a bit of difference between their DVD quality movies and their so-called HD quality wmv files. I found, to my great disappointment that their "HD" videos were without exception 640x480 px with a total bitrate of approx. 3300.

Now other sites manage to give you a decent picture even with those specifications but trust me, the quality here is really bad. I cannot bear to watch anything I have downloaded so far, especially in full screen.

Low recommendation. They are not ripping you off, but they don't give you top quality either and if you subscribed at their regular price you would pay too much.

05-29-10  09:14am

Replies (4)
Rating
50
Visit Public Disgrace

Public Disgrace
(0)

90.0
No Review.
04-26-10  02:45pm


Shown : 26-50 of 89 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1 seconds.