Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : HeatherMcXxx (10)  

Feedback:   All (98)  |   Reviews (9)  |   Comments (2)  |   Replies (87)

Other:   Replies Received (63)  |   Trust Ratings (39)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-10 of 10  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit Amateur Allure

Amateur Allure
(2)

76.0
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: The strength of this site is the attractiveness of the models, though in the two years since I last subscribed the quality has fallen somewhat. Thomas recruits some impressive girl-next-door types -- fully clothed at the start -- to stop by and visit. While the site is obviously dedicated to oral, many models engage in intercourse, and these tend to be the most erotic scenes, with camera angles that include a close-up of the model's face. The site is easy to navigate, and if a particular model interests you, you can link to her other performances from the current scene.
Cons: Thomas seems like a fairly likable guy, but as he becomes aroused, he can get rather annoying, constantly referring to the models with terms like "silly girl." (Ay caramba!) Also, the plot of these scenes rarely changes, which is disappointing because the model typically doesn't reveal her nude body -- of interest to me -- until after the first Thomas climax. Also, as with similar sites, there's that insistence that the girl "show us" what she's about to swallow (sigh), and there are few facials. Finally, the girl-next-door trope is often an illusion, since so many of the models are porn starlets pretending to be unknowns.
Bottom Line: Look, if oral is your thing, you won't be disappointed with a one-month subscription to this site. But you'll probably find no reason to stick around longer than that, because you'll have seen what the site has to offer, and that can be stimulating only for so long. (I'm surprised this site keeps going, frankly.)

In that month, you'll enjoy lots of attractive girls on their knees, beginning fully clothed (which I'm a fan of), then gradually disrobing throughout the scene. (That's not as erotic as it sounds, although it could be if more care were taken with this element of the performances.) You'll get lots of awkward smiles from the models as they respond to Thomas' dumb and obvious queries. (Thomas: "What are you going to do now?" Model on her knees: "Suck your cock?")

Thomas occasionally mixes it up with straight sex scenes (always erotic, especially given the focus on the model's face and body), but it almost always ends with the patented deposit in the mouth, which, I assume, is why most subscribers pay the monthly fee.

The music fascinates me, because while the models are recruited (clearly) for their innocent looks and youthful personalities -- in truth, some seem not to be into the sex, though they can be a pleasure to look at -- the music has this dark, seamy quality about it, which casts an aura over the scene that, for me, creates a delightfully sinful mood.

05-18-11  09:56am

Replies (7)
Review
2
Visit Amateur Allure

Amateur Allure
(2)

80.0
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: The strength of this site is the attractiveness of the models. Thomas recruits some quality girl-next-door types -- fully clothed at the start -- to stop by and visit. While the site is obviously dedicated to oral, some models engage in intercourse, and these tend to be the most erotic scenes, with camera angles that include a close-up of the model's face. The site is easy to navigate, and if a particular model interests you, you can link to her other performances from the current scene.
Cons: Thomas seems like an amiable guy, but as he becomes aroused, he can become rather annoying, constantly referring to the models with terms like "silly girl." (Ay carumba!) Also, the plot of these scenes rarely changes, which is disappointing because the model doesn't reveal her nude body -- of interest to me -- until after the first Thomas climax. Also, as with similar sites, there's that insistence that the girl "show us" what she's about to swallow (sigh), and there are few facials.
Bottom Line: If oral is your thing, you won't be disappointed with a one-month subscription to this site. But you'll probably find no reason to stick around longer than that, because you'll have seen what the site has to offer, and that can be stimulating only for so long.

In that month, though, you'll enjoy lots of gorgeous girls on their knees, beginning fully clothed (which I'm a fan of), then gradually disrobing throughout the scene. (That's not as erotic as it sounds, though it could be if more care were taken with this element of the performances.) Thomas occasionally mixes it up with straight sex scenes (always erotic, especially given the focus on the model's face and body), but it almost always ends with the patented deposit in the mouth, which, I assume, is why most subscribers pay the monthly fee.

The music is fascinating to me, because while the models are recruited (clearly) for their innocent looks and charming personalities -- in truth, some seem not to be into the sex, though they're a pleasure to look at -- the music has this dark, seamy quality about it, which casts an aura over the scene that, for me, creates a delightfully sinful mood.

09-13-07  05:11pm

Replies (4)
Review
3
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls
(5)

86.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The women are beautiful, and the site does a decent job giving us a glimpse of their personalities, even if the scenes are, at times, contrived. I like that some of the scenes include the model clothed -- I enjoy seeing how the models look dressed up ... what they choose to wear, etc.
Cons: I use a Mac, and I can't view the movies until I download them fully, then play. I'd much rather view them without downloading, but I haven't been able to figure out how to do that. Downloads aren't terribly speedy either.
Bottom Line: Very well done. Erotic. One of the best sites I've seen for this type of content. I'm not into extreme insertions, so I like that I can pick and choose the videos I wish to view. I've only been a member a few days, but I've watched several scenes with several models, and I've yet to be disappointed.

Follow-Up:
After a three weeks on this site, I became rather fatigued with it. The updates weren't frequent enough, and the girls not captivating enough. I canceled my account and joined Nubiles, which, at least for the time being, is a better site with more options (and some of the same girls).

Most of what I said in my original review still stands, but the site had, at least for me, a short shelf life.

07-30-07  09:40am

Replies (0)
Review
4
Visit I DeepThroat

I DeepThroat
(0)

76.0
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: Let's hear it a for thoroughly charming and beautiful girl -- with a gift that any man would cherish. She's real, she's fun, and she's always energetic ... the girl next door offering a peek through her shades into her naughty world. Heather has been at it for several years now, offering the same gimmick with the same guy (occasionally they invite another girl into the picture), and doing so with gusto and an ever-present smile that's irresistible. This site doesn't pretend to be anything else.
Cons: Do you like deep throat? How about more deep throat? And more? Even the most dedicated deep-throat aficionado would tire of this site ultimately; I suspect some keep their memberships just so they don't disappoint Heather (such is the connection they have with her). Alas, as the site has aged, Heather has made unfortunate adjustments, first having her breasts done (they were wonderfully natural ... now almost grotesque), then going blonde (sigh). As such, the best videos are still the earliest.
Bottom Line: I love Heather ... I love her attitude, the joy she obviously gets out of performing, and the fact that she's crazy about her man (and monogamous!). There was a time when the competition wasn't so great and her site was fairly popular. But times have changed, and while you have to applaud her for not making any major adjustments to content, the site seems dated now, and there are only so many scenes you can cook up to feature deep-throating. That said, she's always worth a look ... she has a great body (so the straight sex scenes are enjoyable), she's genuine in her performances, and it must be a turn-on for guys to see her gorgeous face and smile and imagine themselves on the other end of her talents. She's a delight, but the site lacks vitality now.

09-10-07  09:52am

Replies (2)
Review
5
Visit I Feel Myself

I Feel Myself
(0)

82.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This is a hard site not to like. It features natural women exploring their bodies in erotic settings, and the orgasms -- thank goodness -- are real and powerful. Categories include "Solo," "Friends" (where the actress is joined by others), "Lubrications" (interviews) and "Homemade." The full collection of each model's videos on the site are listed when you're watching one of her scenes (in the event you wish to sample another ... and another). This site can be VERY erotic.
Cons: The content is so consistent, it can be, at times, too predictable and not as arousing. Some will find too many of the women unappealing to their tastes (these are not glamour models), and the scenes may not be exciting enough for some (there are a couple of camera angles for each shoot, and that's it).
Bottom Line: For a limited amount of time, this site can be a welcome respite from other porn sites, given that its sole reason for existence is the celebration of women masturbating. It is well worth a month's subscription fee to experience its unique qualities.

08-20-07  04:31pm

Replies (2)
Review
6
Visit Live Jasmin

Live Jasmin
(0)

60.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: At any given time, you can find plenty of models in a variety of categories. The site does a good job providing an abundance of categories so you can focus in on your particular desire (assuming you have one). Non-members can also sample a model chat room anonymously and contribute to the conversation. (This is a double-edged sword, however, since some of the guests dominate the chat with rude comments, silly talk, etc.)
Cons: Many negatives: (1) the site doesn't allow negative reviews or comments, so it's difficult to know how good a performer is; (2) members can't communicate with each other directly -- only through a forum that's heavily edited so no negative comments about the site are ever posted; (3) you need to purchase a membership on top of the live chat fees if you wish to communicate with a model via a private message, save lots of favorites, etc.; (4) many models either don't speak English well or can't type, so they pretend to type during a private session while someone else in the room (off-camera) does the actual typing; (5) model profiles usually aren't written by the models themselves (the site uses cut-and-paste to fill in profile answers) and are rarely accurate; (6) the site has HORRIBLE customer service when a private session is poor. Even the best members have to haggle to get even a partial refund from a botched session (i.e., when the performer didn't realize you were in the room).
Bottom Line: The site isn't worth the cost. While a few models are available for 0.98 per minute, quality models are at least $1.99/minute and higher. (The best amateur models can be as high as $3.99/minute; porn stars can be $5.99/minute.) In short, a 10-minute session is usually a minimum of $20, and the models are trained effectively to try and engage in small talk in the private sessions to stall for time and run up the bill. This can get VERY expensive if you wish to relax and have fun with a model.

While the site frequently tries to improve (by adding superficial features), the fundamental flaws noted above are never addressed. And given the sizable investment necessary to take advantage of the site, users should be allowed access to better information (i.e., honest reviews shouldn't be edited or deleted) about performers, and they should be able to communicate with each other (member to member) to discuss the site and share info.

Instead, Live Jasmin is intent on squelching any honest communication on the site that isn't positive. And for all its censorship, some performers still admit in private that they're not treated well, though that probably comes with the territory and isn't necessarily systemic.

All in all, I'd avoid this place unless you have a ton of cash to dispose of. Of course, you can't really avoid this place because it makes so much money that it advertises EVERYWHERE. But it's no more than a mediocre business that, at least in some respects, is very poorly run.

08-04-10  06:06pm

Replies (10)
Review
7
Visit Meat Members

Meat Members
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: You get access to multiple sites covering a variety of categories, and each day you're provided with two or three scene updates, which seems reasonable. If you like hardcore action that's not always respectful of women, this would seem to be a logical choice for you. Each site in the package has an archive that often allows you to choose from among several past scenes. It offers "extreme" content, such as Midnight Prowl, where women have sex with strangers in porn shops.
Cons: Several sites in this package no longer update, and even those considered "active" haven't updated in months, so users are provided current scenes from only a limited number of truly active sites. This is rude and crude stuff mostly ... reality video with a jiggling camera and inane interviews. Also, the package allows for no crossover search in the event you wish to know if a model has done scenes for other sites in the package. (Many models overlap.)
Bottom Line: Guys into hardcore likely find this package worth the money simply because of the number of sites (and the number of archived scenes). It is what it is; it doesn't pretend to be anything else. It's a caveman's delight.

08-20-07  04:19pm

Replies (0)
Review
8
Visit Nubiles.net

Nubiles.net
(2)

92.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: I tried Nubiles after a test drive of FTV -- in fact, I linked to Nubiles from FTV -- and I find Nubiles better in almost every respect. There are plenty of models to choose from, and accessing their pictures and videos couldn't be easier. Moreover, I can watch a stream without downloading, something I wasn't able to do on FTV. Lastly, the interviews and photos suggest an authenticity; the girls aren't pressured to pretend they're sex-crazed bunnies. They look comfortable and sincere.
Cons: As with any site of its kind, there are plenty of models who won't appeal to you. Also, there's a disappointing repetition with some of the models' shoots (i.e. here's Jane exposing herself in a pink bikini; here's Jane exposing herself in a black dress; etc.). Finally, this site can be too much of a good thing: the main page has so many options that it can be overwhelming, and the model pages are equally as loaded with choices. But that's a minor gripe that may be a big plus for some users.
Bottom Line: My time spent on this site is, admittedly, limited, but I've yet to be disappointed when I've visited. I can always find a cute model, and there are always plenty of pictures (typically beginning with the model fully clothed ... which I prefer) and some videos. (Some models perform hardcore scenes, by the way.) In the end, this seems worth the money. Perhaps in a month I'll feel differently -- that was my experience with FTV (I grew tired of it). But for now I can say without hesitation that it's one of the best sites I've test-driven. =)

09-10-07  08:37am

Replies (0)
Review
9
Visit Suicide Girls

Suicide Girls
(0)

65.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -- Lots of picture sets
-- An engaged community of models and members who participate in an abundance of groups both sexual and non-sexual
-- A well-organized home page allowing for easy navigation
-- Models representing lots of shapes and sizes, all of whom reflect different notions of beauty
Cons: -- Quality of pic sets varies markedly
-- Some models won't be to your liking, more so than on other sites where you find a more consistent level of beauty
-- Videos are brief and eclectic, not typically erotic (and, usually, superfluous)
-- Pic sets can't be downloaded
Bottom Line: Welcome to the post-Rigel era at Suicide Girls. Rigel was a popular model (and administrator) on the site until 2010, when conflicts at the company -- as well as a desire to return to school -- hastened her departure. She represented the ideal SG: gorgeous, shapely, inventive, and, of course, irresistible thanks to her stunning tattoos. A new Rigel set was an event -- you knew you'd get high-quality, erotic photos shaped around a creative concept. She was the best.

Her exit came after the site began expanding its model roster, and, given the influx of new talent, the quality of the photo sets diminished, and the models themselves became less compelling. Fewer and fewer captivate me now, and it's difficult to keep up with the ever-changing and expanding roster. (Only a handful of true stars, like Annalee, remain.) Many of the sets will leave you flat; others will have you scratching your head. Occasionally, you'll find a model and set that capture you. Quality control seems lacking, though part of the aim of the site, no doubt, is to be more democratic in who they feature. It is what is -- no more.

One of the advantages of SG is the active (and large) community, comprised of both models and members, who post to the site's board and who participate in an abundance of groups that cover sexuality, religion, philosophy, the arts, and pop culture. Many of the groups have active discussions. I suspect some members, like me, continue to buy a subscription merely to keep abreast of group goings-on.

On the topic of subscription rate, it's not expensive. You pay $49/year, and if you let your membership lapse, eventually you'll get an offer to renew at $29/year. So it's not a prohibitive investment, and, frankly, it's not worth any more than that, unless your fetish happens to involve tattooed and pierced women.

I've become bored with the photo sets -- they rarely have the charm that Rigel's sets (and those of other classic models) exhibited. But once in a while you're treated to a gem, and the community is always there to engage with. In addition to the pics and videos, you'll find blogs (by both models and members), interviews with well-known figures in the arts community, and a chat feature.

07-15-12  06:45pm

Replies (8)
Review
10
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(6)

84.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: The site offers a large volume of selections, and it updates several times a day. Subscribers can choose to watch an entire scene or just part of a scene by working with the user-friendly interface. The site also allows for quick searches of actors or videos, and it has an easy-to-use menu of categories to choose from. Finally, the site allows members to comment on individual scenes, which can be both entertaining and, at times, irritating -- but mostly entertaining.
Cons: While this site is universally applauded for its volume, the quality of the selections the past few months has been disappointing. The site seems to gravitate to a specific series and present multiple videos in that series over the course of a few days. Too many of these series are dull and poorly exectued. Also, the site has a difficult time dividing "classic" videos into scenes, so trying to enjoy such a video is nearly impossible.
Bottom Line: You can't beat the volume and the frequent updates, but I've been a member before, and the site pales in comparison to what it once was.

08-20-07  04:09pm

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-10 of 10  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.64 seconds.