Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : rearadmiral (384)  

Feedback:   All (1968)  |   Reviews (160)  |   Comments (126)  |   Replies (1682)

Other:   Replies Received (1074)  |   Trust Ratings (73)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 195 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit Pegas Productions

Pegas Productions
(1)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Stunning Quebec models
- A true network with niche sites
- Large site
- Excellent outdoor nudity/sex site
- Supports download managers
- Updates regularly
Cons: - Outdated scene bitrates
- Some of the updates are streaming only
- Server constantly stopped responding and required logging in again
- Dialogue is in French only (but that really doesnít detract from the scenes)
Bottom Line: Iím aware that Quebec has a homegrown porn industry but Iíve never really gone looking for any Quebec porn until I saw this site listed on TBP.

The site is what I would consider to be a true network in that there are 13 sites serving some distinct niches. I contrast this with other sites that sell themselves as a network but have Ďsitesí that are all basically the same. The sites (with current number of videos) are:

ē 3Way Porn: 43
ē Blow me POV: 17
ē Cutie Pussies: 29 (solo)
ē Fresh and Innocent: 39
ē Fun Size Teen: 14
ē Just Eden: 37 (billed as an X-Art style site)
ē Let's Fuck Outside: 37
ē Lezzie BFF: 46
ē Nasty Rookies: 27 (auditions)
ē Samantha Ardente: 11
ē Shake the Snake: 66 (no specific niche)
ē Spice My Sex Life: 14 (mild kink)
ē Straight in the Ass: 15

The number of videos Iíve listed is less than what the TBP page lists because many of the videos are listed on an Ďupdatesí page that has some unreleased stuff and some bloopers mixed in. I have no idea why the site doesnít add the unreleased scenes to an existing site and create a separate bloopers page. I did find a lot of scenes on the update page that were streaming only.

Depending on the age of the scene the file resolution can be fairly low. Iíve seen as low as 640x480. The newer stuff is available for mobile devices and in 1280x720. The real flaw is that the bitrates are quite low. The newest scenes are 2500kb/s which is far less than what other sites are using and it shows. There are scenes with bitrates as low as 1400. Itís possible that all of the material is quite old and theyíre just slowly releasing it on the internet. There are some indications that this could be exactly whatís going on.

The site adds a new scene every two days. While that sounds great, consider that the August 30 update is a three-minute, streaming-only video. To make matters worse, the thumbnail shows it as a public nudity scene but none of that footage is in the upload.

The site allows download managers. Download speeds are quite fast.

I want to single out one site for specific mention. Iím a big fan of outdoor scenes and a big fan of public nudity so I was happy to see a site that catered to this. What I wasnít expecting was how over-the-top some of the scenes are. Many of the scenes are far in excess of American public nudity sites and even surpass many European sites. One scene is shot in a busy commercial area in Quebec City on a stairwell with full nudity. The scene is shot at dusk but this is a well-known and heavily travelled tourist area so this was pretty risky. Another, perhaps even more risky scene, is shot on the boardwalk at the Quebec City harbour next door to the iconic Frontenac hotel. Full nudity happens here too. And these arenít short scenes either. Still another is recorded with a couple in the back of a horse-drawn carriage through old Quebec City on a busy day. This isnít as risky because there are lots of people around but there is some oral sex, nudity and fingering. All three of these scenes are with the Quebec model named Candy Kiss who is young and beautiful. She has many scenes on this specific site. The other models who do risky outdoor public scenes are hot too. If you share my love of these kinds of scenes you really should consider a membership here regardless of some of the flaws. The only stuff Iíve seen that comes close are the European scenes at Public Disgrace. The scenes here at Pegas arenít BDSM though; theyíre a lot more playful than the PD scenes.

The site appears to have an annoying technical flaw. Every time (and I mean EVERY TIME) I downloaded a few videos the server would stop responding and Iíd have to leave the site, go back to it and log in again. I tried different browsers and the problem was the same. I donít know if the site times out or if itís just a flaw, but if you join I hope you donít have the same issue.

Many of the models here are really beautiful, though that shouldnít be a surprise since Quebec women are known for this trait. Some of these models could have easily been A-list models in the U.S.

In a vast majority of the scenes the interaction between the models is in French. For those with no exposure to the language you may not like this. Some newer scenes have a download option with subtitles.

So do I recommend this network? I do, but I also have some reservations in that while a lot of the porn is really hot and features some stunning models, the site itself leaves a lot to be desired. Iím often left wondering why studios put so much effort into making great porn and then sell it to customers in resolutions that are far out of date. If, however, youíre a fan of risky outdoor sex in public places then my recommendation goes way up. Let's Fuck Outside offers some amazing stuff in this rare niche. And at $25 itís a good value and worth having a look at.

08-31-15  04:51pm

Replies (2)
Review
2
Visit Desperate Pleasures

Desperate Pleasures
(1)

87.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Unique site
- Large site (600+ videos)
- Broad range of fetishes
- Good mix of model types
- Supports download managers
- Bills through CC Bill
- Some A-list models
- Good mix of body types and ages, amateur and pro
Cons: - Outdated website
- No download options
Bottom Line: I wasnít aware that this site and studio existed and only discovered it when looking for some older man / younger girl porn. This site offers a lot of that but since it was marketed as a fetish site it also offers a lot of other stuff too.

The site claims that its origins come out of the 2008 recession when the site owner turned to porn to make a living. The interesting part of that decision is that if the owner is the guy who is in most of the videos, heís the last person youíd expect to be in porn videos. Heís a typical middle-aged guy with a bit of a belly and an average dick. And he might be the luckiest man alive.

For a fetish site it has a broad range of niches that it caters to. In the early days (around 2012) the scenes were frequently bondage with tickling. This isn't a hardcore BDSM site as with Kink or sites like that; itís much tamer and more playful. As the site progressed there are videos uploaded with footjobs. There are a few biting videos and a few balloon videos (I didnít know those were porn things). The more recent scenes seem to have more young girl / old guy (with the guy being the site owner, presumably). Many of these push the limits by having an incest theme but unlike the major studios that do these scenes with a stepfather/step-daughter, this site goes right for the daddy/daughter thing. To make this even creepier, many of these scenes are what Iíd guess youíd call the impregnation niche. Throughout the site youíll also find regular updates with MILFs and lesbians. Sex with pregnant models is also fairly common.

The site has a good mix of known pornstars and lesser knowns (to me, at least). Some of the models may be fetish models and some of them may be genuine amateurs. With a broad range of models you also have a broad range of looks and body types so there is likely something here for everyone.

Both the scenes and the site have a very amateur feel to them. The site is about as simple as youíd expect from a Ďstudioí that appears to be run by a couple of people who run the whole operation. Remember what sites looked like in the 1990s? Thatís what this site looks like. Navigation is simple as it is all laid out on 28 pages of videos. Each scene has a medium-sized thumbnail which plays a gif so you can get a sense of what the scene offers. There is a search function but I didnít find it to be accurate.

The camerawork and editing aren't up to major studio standards, but that really isn't a pro or a con, it just is. I like the amateur feel that the camerawork brings to the scenes and it isn't bad enough that it detracts from the scene or distracts the viewer unless youíre really fussy.

The site doesnít offer any download options. You get what they offer. All of the videos are in WMV format and all of them are in 1280x720 resolution. The big variable is that the older scenes have bitrates of 1500kb/s while the newer scenes have bitrates of up to 6000kb/s. They all have a framerate of 29fps. Obviously the newer scenes look better.

The site has approximately 600+ videos. It does update but the updates aren't dated (the older ones are) so I canít really say for sure what the update schedule is. The most recent update saw six new videos added at once and it looks like they do a bulk upload approximately once a week.

The site does offer photos but only as a standalone set. The video shoots usually donít have a photo option and the photo sets donít usually offer video. The site is much more heavily skewed to video so if youíre a photo collector you may want to think carefully before joining. The photos are 1200x800 so certainly not high resolution.

The bottom line? Thatís sort of hard to say. Arguing against a recommendation is the fact that the site is pretty amateurish and the video quality isn't up to standard. On the pro side, however, this is some good porn in some unusual niches. I joined to get access to the older guy/younger girl scenes and these are really well done. Iím not into tickling so I canít really comment on those but I have no reason to think that a person with a tickling fetish wouldnít like the site as much as I do. So with the caveat that you need to know what youíre getting Iíd say this is a definite recommendation if any of the fetishes are to your liking. If youíre into couples oriented artcore then you likely wonít be happy here. But if you like your dirty movies with an extra dose of dirty, you should check this site out. This site is definitely on my list to rejoin regularly.

08-29-15  04:42am

Replies (6)
Review
3
Visit Drone Hunter

Drone Hunter
(1)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of the Mofos network
- Innovative and unique concept
- Most scenes have an outdoor theme
- TBP discount
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Small site
- Hasnít updated in four months
- Typical Mofos / Brazzers model look
- Site will log you off after an hour
Bottom Line: I suppose that with the popularity of drones it was only a matter of time before someone started using them in porn. The concept is unique and it does add to the scenes but for whatever reason the concept seems to have died since the site hasnít added a new scene since April 2015.

In all of the scenes the drone footage is just edited into footage shot by a regular camera. The one possible exception to that is the one lesbian scene which may be all drone footage. In all of the scenes the drone is played up as being surreptitious video that the female model doesnít know of.

The most common scene setup is where the male talent is bringing a girl back to his place and he contacts the Ďdrone hunterí to shoot some secret video of them having sex. There is usually some fake communication between the male talent and the drone operator. A few of the scenes use the scenario where neither the male or female talent know theyíre being viewed by the drone.

The site is quite small with only nine videos uploaded and it looks like it will stay small because it hasnít updated in months. Given that each scene has to be set up to allow access for the drone there is an outdoor or voyeur element to each scene. Perhaps that part of it caused some problems in filming. It seems reasonable to think that a drone hovering over a rooftop patio or looking in a hotel window might attract some unwanted attention. On the other hand, if you like outdoor or public scenes this site certainly has that.

The biggest advantage to the site is the fact that itís part of the Mofos network so youíll have access to a lot of other sites. Also, because Mofos is one of the leading porn sites you can expect their level of quality in the site. There are tags on the scenes but with only nine scenes that really doesnít add anything.

The downside to this being part of the Mofos network is that many of the scenes feature models with the signature Mofos/Brazzers look: big breasts (often fake) and other body mods. One of the models had enough collagen injected into her lips that she looked pretty silly, and to my eyes anyway, not very sexy.

The scenes can be streamed and downloaded. The streaming is available in three resolutions (up to 1080p) and there are six options for downloads: 272p, 368p, 480p, 720p and 1080p in MP4 format and a 480p in WMV. I downloaded the 720p and those come in at 1280x720 at 8000kb/s and 29fps. With those specs youíd expect them to look good and they do, on both a 24Ē monitor and a 50Ē TV.

I used Internet Download Manager and didnít have any issues with the links timing out. If they do time-out that happens after a reasonable delay. One annoyance is that the site itself will kick you out approximately once per hour and require that you sign in again.

I canít say that Iíd recommend this site unless you really have a thing for drones because itís just too small and looks to have gone dormant already. But if youíre interested in the site and you join the network to get it then the real value is in the network itself which has over 2000 videos available. When you consider that you get 2000 scenes for the low TBP discount price of $15USD it really is a good deal.

08-10-15  11:10am

Replies (0)
Review
4
Visit Girls Do Porn

Girls Do Porn
(1)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - True amateurs
- Many stunning young models
- Nearly 300 scenes
- Multiple viewing options
- Fast downloads
- Bill through reputable billers
Cons: - Terrible site design
- Expensive if you want HD
- No model names or info
- No unique identifiers for scenes
- Site defaults back to page one
- Better porn options are available
Bottom Line: GDP is a site that reviewers either love or hate. Itís a site that has squandered its potential. The problem with the site is that it has some beautiful amateurs in some pretty good porn let down by one of the worst site layouts on the internet. If anyone can learn anything from this site itís how not to design a webpage.

The real value of the site is in the models themselves: they are true amateurs and most of them are really quite beautiful. That depends on a bit of a subjective assessment of course since most of the models are Caucasian, young (18-22) and fairly petite. The porn itself is very good, if somewhat formulaic. Most of the scenes follow the same formula of interview, blowjob with the model clothed, some sex in specific positions, more oral, usually more sex and finally finishing with the guy jerking off on the modelís face as she kneels in front of him.

There are currently close to 300 scenes available and the site does update. I canít be specific about the update schedule because the scenes aren't dated but it appears that at least one new scene is added per week.

The scenes are available in streaming at resolutions called high, medium, low and mobile. The downloads are available in 720x405, 1280x720 and mobile. Paying for a premium membership adds downloads in 1920x1280 and 4K on the newer scenes. I downloaded the 1280x720 versions and they come in at 6000 kb/s and 29fps. They look good on a 24Ē monitor and 50Ē TV.

Where things start to fall apart for the site is the site design itself. Describing the issues that the site has seems a bit overwhelming because there are just so many but Iíll hit the highlights:
ē The models aren't named and there is no biography given
ē The scenes have no unique identifier at all. Iíve read on other forums where members will refer to a scene by a shoot number but Iíve never seen any unique information for a scene.
ē Scenes canít be opened in a new tab so you have to open them in your main browser window, but when you click to go back you get taken to the first page again and have to re-select the page you were on. To make matters worse, when you do finally get back to the page you just left the eight thumbnails are all in different order. I ended up downloading several scenes more than once.
ē Only eight anal scenes.

The membership options aren't simple either. In the past you were required to stay for a second month to download HD files but now you can just pay to get the additional access immediately. I opted for the base membership because Iím happy with the 1280x720 files but to access the behind-the-scenes and Ďdeletedí scenes you need pay the additional amount. I figured it would be worth it but there are only 38 BTS scenes and five deleted scenes.

The site bills through Epoch or CC Bill so you can join with confidence that your information will be secure and you can cancel easily.

The site had some of the fastest download speeds that Iíve seen from porn sites. It was rare for me to see less that 20MB/s and most times I was seeing 25MB/s. I downloaded a lot in my first few days and if there is a download limit (which I donít think there is) itís high enough that only a serious porn glutton would hit it.

So is it worth joining or not? The site itself is deeply flawed and could be easily improved; the improvements would be like picking low-hanging fruit so that leads me to the conclusion that the site owners aren't really interested in improving things. To be fair to the site owners though, they might be putting their efforts into recruiting the models. The models are really the true value of this site: most of them are true amateurs and are really good looking. They appear to be having fun too. So when I balance the good and the bad I have to give this site a cautious recommendation: the porn is very good but the site is very bad. But, if you go into the deal with your eyes open armed with knowledge of the flaws youíll be okay. Unless you absolutely must have HD or 4K or have a big thing for BTS or deleted scenes you can save yourself some money and take only the basic membership. So the recommendation is a definite maybe. I likely wonít rejoin and hereís something Iíve never done in a review before; Iíll suggest a better alternative: you can get very similar porn on a much better site at Exploited College Girls.

08-03-15  06:00am

Replies (2)
Review
5
Visit Brand New Amateurs

Brand New Amateurs
(1)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - True amateur site
- Inexpensive full trial
- Fast downloads
- Many different ages and body types
- Broad range of scene types
- Simple layout
- Extensive use of niche tags
- No download limits
- Reputable biller
Cons: - Many different ages and body types
- No known update schedule
Bottom Line: Iíve had mixed experiences with amateur sites. This may sound hypocritical but my favorite amateur sites are often those that use models who are in some form of the adult business Ė like cam shows Ė and are getting into videos. These sites (like Exploited College Girls) tend to be less amateurish. Brand New Amateurs falls into the class of being more of a true amateur site. Iím still browsing through the scenes and the only recognizable model Iíve seen is Halle Von.

This can be a pro or a con depending on your personal tastes, but sites that fall closer to the true amateur site tend to have a broad range of model ages and body types. This is great if you have interests that run the range from petite models in their late teens though BBW models to MILFs. This isnít so great if youíre like me and have a narrow range of likes. But since the site many scenes there should be something for everyone.

I canít give a definitive answer on the update schedule as the scenes arenít dated but judging by the dates on the scene comments by members it looks like there is at least one new scene per week.

The site also offers a broad range of scene types which I think is a pro no matter how you slice it. There are solo scenes, some with toys, there are girl/girl scenes, there are boy/girl oral scenes, b/g/g scenes, some rimming scenes and even some anal scenes. And there are several scenes in the rare niche of white male/black female scenes too. Again, something for everyone.

The site has a very simple layout in that there is only one long page with a large thumbnail for each scene. Clicking on the thumbnail opens a new page where you can download the scene or get photos. The site has a limited search function but this is offset by being able to sort by model and the extensive use of niche tags.

Video downloads are only available as MP4s and only in one resolution per scene, but that resolution is high. Most of the scenes are 1920x1280 at around 6,000kb/s and 29fps. There are some lower at 1280x720 with bitrates ranging from 1,500-2,500kb/s and 29fps. The downside to having only one file size is that people with slower internet connections may wish for a smaller file size. The scenes look good with no pixilation but the downside is that since these are shot in someoneís home the production values are what youíd see in a more professional site. Lighting, for example, is sometimes a bit too dark. But it can also be argued that these Ďflawsí add to the amateur appeal.

The site supports download managers but I canít really say if there is a problem with links timing out. I use Internet Download Manager and have a relatively fast connection but the download speeds I saw here were probably the best Iíve ever seen. Iíd see a sustained 25MB/sec download most of the time. Iíve seen other sites only allow 20% of that speed.

One advantage to this site is that they offer a full trial. My worry was that Iíd trigger a download limit but I didnít find one. In one afternoon I downloaded all the scenes I wanted and never saw a limit or had my download speeds throttled. I downloaded 50GB of data in less than three hours so if there is a limit it is very generous.

The bottom line is that this is a good site in the true amateur niche. When you factor in the availability of a full trial at a low cost there is almost no risk to someone joining the site. Given that the site bills through CC Bill the only risk is the membership fee itself, and Iím confident that most new members could easily find lots of porn to make at least the trial membership a good value.

07-08-15  05:32pm

Replies (0)
Review
6
Visit Tushy.com

Tushy.com
(1)

87.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Rare plot-based, softer-edged anal site
- Excellent quality scenes
- Updates weekly
- A-list porn models
- Several scenes listed as first anals
- Multiple download options
- Supports download managers
- Photos as singles or zips
Cons: - New and still small
- Expensive for the current size of the site
- Some issues with download managers
- Site wonít remember username / password
Bottom Line: Tushy.com is a rare site that features anal sex in plot-based scenes that border on having couples appeal. The site is clearly aiming for a different market from many other anal sex sites where the goal there is more to turn the event into an endurance test for the model. Here there is a short scene set-up followed by some sex where there is some chemistry between the models that just happens to have some anal sex thrown in for good measure.

As another PU member has pointed out, this site looks a lot like another site in quality and feel. Tushy.com is run by Greg Lansky who is also behind Blacked. For those who donít know Blacked, it is a site that offers high quality, plot-based interracial porn. The fact that Lansky is behind this new site gives me a lot of hope that it will be as good as Blacked. (The only worry that I have is that has Lansky stretched himself too far in opening another site? Will Blacked be lower quality and will Tushy not hit the lofty mark set by its sister site? I hope that both remain excellent quality.)

Because the site is new it is still quite small with only 12 scenes uploaded. The site does update with the addition of a new scene each week. The site still charges the full rate even though theyíre new and small. (I prefer the model used by Swallow Salon where the price is lower presumably in part to reflect the small size. I also understand that the porn that Tushy.com produces Ė anal and expensive production costs Ė is far higher than oral scenes on one set.)

As with all good porn sites, this one offers some choice in how members can access the scenes. Scenes are only available in MP4 format and in various resolutions: 1080p, 720p, 480p, 480p mobile, 360p mobile and 270p mobile. Streaming is also available in RESOLUTION. I downloaded the 720p scenes as they were the best compromise between size and quality and those come in at a high bitrate of over 8,000kb/s and a framerate of 29fps. Subjectively they look great and Iíd recommend testing a few of the 1280p scenes before you immediately go for a higher resolution.

Streaming is also available but I canít tell the resolution. It looks to be HD though. Trailers are available for each scene too.

Photos are available too. They look more like stand-alone photos rather than screencaps, which is what Iíd expect of a site that pushes quality. The photos are available as singles and zips and the zipped photos come in at 3000x2000.

The site supports download managers but I did encounter a problem initially. When you click to download a scene a pop-up with the download options comes up. Selecting the resolution started the download outside my manager. I wasnít a big deal to get it to download with the DM and then cancel the other download. This only happened on the first day I was a member and that issue hasnít recurred since.

Several of the scenes are listed as being first anals. As a collector of that specific niche itís great that this site may be offering more of that.

While all the scenes look like theyíre exclusive to this site I canít say for sure. The two most recent updates have the word ĎExclusiveí splashed across the thumbnail leaving me to think that the others may not be exclusive. I buy a lot of porn, and specifically a lot of anal porn and Iíve never seen these scenes before.

I mentioned that most of the scenes have a softer feel to them than in a lot of other anal sites. The exception to this is the one scene I joined to get access to, and thatís a very rare anal scene from Kacey Jordan. Iím only aware of one other anal scene sheís done (for Dirt Pipe Divas) so no one is going to call her an anal queen. Maybe sheís playing this as part of the role in the scene, but she doesnít look too comfortable throughout the lengthy anal sex part of the scene. But most, if not all of the other scenes are like this.

The bottom line is that with the current size of the site itís hard to argue that it offers good value for the monthly fee of $30 but the value equation has to take into consideration the quality of whatís offered here too, and itís fair to say that this is excellent quality porn. Itís also worth noting that the site continues to grow. I know that not everyone will agree with me, but I think value is more about quality than quantity. If you like softer anal scenes you really should check out this site.

07-06-15  05:12pm

Replies (4)
Review
7
Visit Swallow Salon

Swallow Salon
(1)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Affiliated with Amateur Allure
- Inexpensive
- Beautiful models giving incredible blowjobs
- Updates with one scene per week
Cons: - Very small site
- Not enough female nudity
- Only one video choice
Bottom Line: I know Amateur Allure has attracted some very different reviews. I fall solidly in the fan group as AA is likely my favorite adult site on the internet. So when AA posted an update on that site that had a slightly different look and had a watermark for Swallow Salon I immediately headed over there and joined too. I canít say for certain, but it looks like Swallow Salon is affiliated with Amateur Allure and done by the same guys.

Like AA, SS is formula-driven. Some people really dislike this but I think that if you have a good formula why mess with it? The premise is that the male talent is visiting a salon where beautiful women give amazing blowjobs and swallow cum. Also like AA, SS uses just one set Ė in this case itís an enclosed small space with thin opaque coverings and there are multi-colored lights outside to create an interesting effect. The male talent is usually seated for most of the BJ with the model kneeling in front of him. They usually swap to him standing at some point before the cumshot. Like AA, SS features some of the most beautiful models in porn (who are usually just beginning their careers so theyíre still fresh) giving some amazing blowjobs. Most of these blowjobs transcend the ordinary and are closer to cock worship with lots of licking and good use of the tongue. There is lots of eye contact too. Every blowjob ends with a cumshot in the mouth and the model playing with it for a few seconds before swallowing it.

The biggest negative for the site now is its small size. There are only nine scenes available now. The site is growing slowly with a new scene being added every week. To be fair to the site, they do compensate for the small size by offering a low membership fee of $16 USD. I like the site enough that Iíll just keep a recurring membership at that price.

Two subjective complaints I have about the scenes are that the models wear a short and sexy white smock that you might see in a place that gives blowjobs, but in most scenes we never really get to see the model without it. Yes, they will hike the short smock when on their knees, but with the stunning looks of the models here they really need to have the remove the smock for the latter part of the scene. The second subjective complaint is that unlike AA where the blowjob transitions to sex before going back to the blowjob for the finish, SS only has sex in one scene. That isn't too bad given the quality of the blowjobs, but personally Iíd like to see some sex too. With the model naked.

There is only one option for downloading each scene. The scenes are all MP4s with most of them at a relatively low resolution of 960x540. The bitrate is fairly high (pushing 7,000kb/s) though and the framerate is 29fps so those scenes still look very good. The most recent update was in 1920x1080 with the same bitrate and framerate so maybe all future scenes will be at that higher resolution.

I know many readers might question my score, but given the high quality of the scene offered here I think itís justified. The low price offsets the small size and I hope the site continues to grow. Iím usually willing to put my money where my mouth is and say that if I like a site Iíll add it to my list of sites I rejoin regularly, but Iíll go one step further here: I like this site (and the low fee) enough that Iíll just stay a member. If you like sensual blowjob sites with beautiful women this is definitely worth subscribing to.

07-05-15  07:27am

Replies (4)
Review
8
Visit Driver XXX

Driver XXX
(1)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Part of the Nubiles.net group
- A-list models
- Many download options
- Supports download managers
- Rare niche
Cons: - Small site
- Updates irregularly
Bottom Line: Iím a big fan of car-themed porn so when I saw this site listed at TBP I signed up. I didnít realize that it was bundled with Nubiles.net at the time I subscribed but that worked out well because this site is quite small so having access to Nubiles made the membership worth it.

The main theme of the site turned out to be a little different than I had expected. I like watching road-head scenes and I expected that here but didnít get that. While most of the scenes take place in cars they mostly occur in the back seat when the car is parked. Some of the scenes have the model outside leaning up against the car.

The site is quite small and wouldnít be a good value if it wasnít bundled with a bigger site. There are currently only 11 videos available. To make things worse, the last update was three weeks ago. It appears that it is in an update cycle that feeds into Nubiles-Porn, the Nubiles site where they separate out all of their hardcore scenes for those of us who prefer those.

While the site is currently quite small it is fair to say that the porn on offer is very high quality. The models are the biggest A-list girls working Ė but itís important to note that since this site is affiliated with Nubiles that you can only expect models who fit into that category. The models are all young (18-20) and petite.

As with other Nubiles sites, there are many download options. There are five MP4 choices (1920x1080, 1280x720, 960x540, 640x360, 480x270) and a lone WMV offering at 1280x720. I downloaded the 1280x720 MP4s and they look great. If you normally download the highest resolution available you may want to check the 1280x720 first because they look really good.

Pictures are also available and aren't just an afterthought. The photos can be downloaded as singles or as zips. There are three resolutions available for the zips: 5600x3700, 2000x1333 and 1200x800

Apart from the small size and irregular updates there aren't any serious problems with the site. One minor quibble I have with a couple of the scenes is that they end to reveal that the girl has been tricked and used for sex. I find that adds nothing to the scene. It reminds me of early Captain Stabbin videos where the scene closed with the girl going for a swim, being tossed a life ring and then the boat sailing away. Only two of the scenes here use that closing and I hope that future scenes avoid it.

Iíd recommend the site but suggest that if youíre interested in a membership you consider that what youíre buying is access to the Nubiles.net network and youíll also happen to get access to this site with a fairly rare niche.

06-08-15  01:59pm

Replies (0)
Review
9
Visit Petite HD Porn

Petite HD Porn
(1)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A great site in an under-served niche
- A-list models
- Part of the Nubiles.net network
- 85 exclusive scenes
- Streaming and downloads
- Lots of download options
- Photos available in multiple resolutions
Cons: - Nothing without sounding petty
Bottom Line: Iím not sure how I missed this being listed as a new site at TBP back 18 months ago as this is something I should have noticed. The Ďpetiteí niche a favorite of mine and since this is part of the Nubiles.net family I had a lot of confidence in joining knowing that Nubiles makes some great porn and of the many times Iíve joined there Iíve always been a satisfied customer.

Given the name of the site it isn't hard to figure out that they feature some of the more petite models in the industry. When the site first launched in late 2013 they featured mostly European and Russian models but fairly quickly moved to featuring more American models. Iím not biased against European and Russian models but porn is a lot about Ďcollectingí for me and since so many European and Russian models seem to work under multiple stage names itís harder to collect scenes from my favorites.

The site is a whoís who of petite models. Dakota (or Kota) Skye, Emily Grey, Halle Von, Mary Jane Johnson, Riley Reid and Sarah Luvv all have scenes here. (And if youíll allow a moment of obvious subjectivity, thereís a Dakota Skye scene that will likely make it to my all-time favorite scenes list.)

Apart from using petite models there is no common theme in the scenes. Most of the scene set-ups are fairly standard.

The site currently has 85 exclusive scenes uploaded. The site doesnít update on a regular schedule, but it definitely is updating. Some weeks there can be two or three updates and then the site goes two weeks without one.

The site offers streaming but I donít use that so I really canít comment.

Downloads are available in five MP4 resolutions (1920x1080, 1280x720, 960x540, 640x360, 480x270) and in WMV format at 1280x720. I downloaded the 1280x720 MP4s and those have a bitrate of 4500kb/s and a framerate of 59fps. Those are better specs than I see at many similar sites but Iíve learned to expect Nubiles to be better than most sites. Subjectively the scenes look great and I recommend that if you normally download only the highest resolution try the 1280x720 because you may be happy and save some disk space.

As with other Nubiles sites photos aren't just an afterthought. Photos are available as singles or in a zip. There are three zipped options: 5600x3700, 2000x1333 and 1200x800.

The site supports download managers. I had no issue with the links timing out but part of that could be attributed to the download speeds being very fast.

There really aren't any serious negatives to mention here. The only one that I can think of is that when I selected for anal scenes using the anal tag, some of the scenes had no anal sex in them. Thatís hardly a deal-breaker. (For the record, there are about eight anal scenes here, one being the above-mentioned scene with Dakota Skye.)

I definitely recommend this site for anyone who likes petite models. Youíll get access to the A-list of petite models in some well-shot and edited scenes. Youíll have lots of options to download the scenes too. If this were a stand-alone site I might think that it is a good, but not great, value, but since itís part of the Nubiles.net family it is definitely a great value even at full price.

05-25-15  03:22pm

Replies (0)
Review
10
Visit Perv City

Perv City
(1)

89.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 300 scenes
- 30+ are exclusive to this site
- Supports download managers (but links time out in 10-15 minutes)
- High production values
- Top models in the business
- Not misogynistic, the models are obviously having fun
- Tons of ass play and anal sex
Cons: - Very large file sizes
- Some may see his work as repetitive, formulaic
- 90% of the scenes here aren't exclusive
- Scene links time out (10-15 minutes)
Bottom Line: Most readers here will know Mike Adrianoís work and those who do will either have a solidly pro or con opinion of it. Heís not polarizing because his work is like Max Hardcore, because it certainly isnít, but his work isn't for everyone.

For those who donít know Adrianoís work, itís fair to say that he has a signature look and feel to his scenes. Most of his scenes are shot in a combination of an outdoor setup and an indoor room. He only shoots the biggest stars in the business, and his scenes all have a definite ass theme to them. Even those rare Adriano scenes that donít feature anal sex are still ass-focused. Other things youíll see a lot of are sloppy blowjobs, lots of drool, ball-licking, male-on-female rimming, many scenes have female-on-male rimming and tons of anal sex. Itís important to note that while some sites could treat these sex acts in a way that was degrading to the female models that doesnít happen here. There is no hint of D/s or misogyny here; the models really look to be having fun and Mike Adriano is truly an ass worshipper. Some may find fault that most of his scenes follow a formula but my thought is that since he found a formula that works thereís nothing wrong with sticking to it.

The site is broken down into five Ďsitesí Ė Anal Overdose, Chocolate BJs, Oral Overdose, Banging Beauties, Up Her Asshole Ė but the main site has all the scenes. The sub-sites are great as filters but donít go into this thinking youíre getting access to several distinct sites.

There are currently about 300 scenes available but a prospective member needs to know that only about 30 of these are exclusive. Adriano is a prolific director and performer and is one of the leading directors at Evil Angel. He also shoots for Bang Bros. A member here will find a lot of the same EA scenes on this site too. The good news is that this lack of exclusivity is factored into the price. In my opinion the price of the membership is fair even if all you want are the exclusive scenes.

Each scene opens into a separate page with only one option to stream and three download options, all of which are MP4: 1920x1080, 1280x720 and 704x480. Iím not sure how theyíre encoded but the file sizes are a lot larger than Iím used to seeing for similar specs. The 720p files are all around 3GB each and the 1080p files can top out at more than 5GB. The file sizes may be an issue for some users but given the quality of the porn I didnít find it an issue. The file sizes may also be a reflection of the fact that most of the scenes are near an hour long and many are over an hour long.

The site supports download managers but the links do time out after 10 or 15 minutes. The download speeds varied from okay to great, but given the size of many of the files it wasnít possible to queue up more than two or three 720p scenes at a time.

The site updates with a new scene being added approximately every three days. An important point, however, is that only one exclusive scene is added per month.

I didnít look all that hard, but if there are photos on the site they aren't obvious. Itís fair to say that Adrianoís work is geared to video collectors anyway.

The bottom line is that this is an excellent site that is definitely worth joining. If you like high-quality videos of the top names in the business doing some nasty things and enjoying it, then this site is for you. If youíre already a Mike Adriano fan you just need to be aware that 90% of the scenes here are available elsewhere, mostly on Evil Angel. But if you are truly a Mike Adriano fan the membership fee is still worth it for the exclusive scenes.

05-23-15  09:32am

Replies (4)
Review
11
Visit Premium Pass

Premium Pass
(1)

63.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Tens of thousands of videos
- Some of videos appear to be exclusive
- Some videos have decent resolutions
Cons: - Few and irregular updates
- Most sites not updating
- A lot of overlap between sites
- The one main site uses low-quality updates
- Almost a clone of Pornstar Network
Bottom Line: This review may be a lot more ambiguous than what I normally write but I seem to have more questions than answers about this site (these sites?).

The network is made up of 25 pornstar sites, a mega-site, a Ďmeduim-sizedí site and four niche sites. I canít even give an educated guess as to how many DVDs or scenes are available here because there is a lot of overlap between the Ďsites,í but it would be safe to say that there are tens of thousands of videos here. Sounds enticing, doesnít it?

Of the 25 pornstar sites only four are updating and the update schedules of those can be generously described as sporadic. There can be two updates in a week and then eight months until the next one. The niche sites no longer update. The medium-sized site, called Premium Pass also doesnít update. The mega-site, Premium Vids, updates with a new DVD being added almost daily. That sounds okay doesnít it?

But maybe not. I havenít been a member at Pornstar Network in a while, but having had a membership at PSN a couple of years ago I was immediately struck that Premium Vids is exactly the same as PSN. Comparing the PSN tour pages to PV shows that PSN says they have a lot more videos though, but that may be a result of PSN requiring an upgrade to access all their videos. This is just speculation, but maybe PSN minus the upgrade-required vids equals Premium Vids.

If that isn't a big enough issue, the mega-site relies heavily, and perhaps exclusively, on lower-tier studios with unknown models. Many of these are also very old so the video quality is pretty bad too.

I did check the video quality on some of the later updates on the pornstar sites and those are not bad at 1280x720. I suspect the proportion of videos with that resolution is quite low.

I canít say for certain, but a lot of the videos on the pornstar sites seem to be exclusive (with the possible exception of Pornstar Network).

Perhaps the strangest thing I experienced with this site is that as an avid porn collector I downloaded exactly zero videos from this site (other than a couple of samples to check resolutions Ė which were then deleted). This occurs so rarely that Iím not even sure if it has happened to me.

So would I recommend this site? Only to a narrow group of collectors who find that a favorite model has some scenes here and he just has to get them. Other than that Iíd stay away from this site. Itís mostly a collection of older videos, many of them from low-grade studios with unknown models. If you have $20 to spend on a porn membership you can do a lot better than this.

I think high praise of a site is to tell readers that I liked it so much thatís Iíll definitely be rejoining it again. In this case, itís fair to say that Iíll never join Premium Pass again.

(Luckily, cancelling my membership was easy.)

05-20-15  05:30pm

Replies (0)
Review
12
Visit Kink University

Kink University
(1)

88.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Interesting and rare niche
- Part of the well-known Kink family of sites
- Good looking models
- Great production values
- 51 scenes
- Updates weekly
- Supports download managers
- Low price for admission to the Kink world
Cons: - Likely too narrow a niche to attract many viewers
- New site design is less user-friendly
- Download speeds can be slower than average
- Wide gap in file sizes between highest and next-highest resolutions
Bottom Line: BDSM and D/s is a porn niche that I enjoy. Iíve always found that Kink.com offers some of the best BDSM and D/s videos available anywhere. One of my wishes was they would show more behind-the-scenes or Ďhow toí videos since in most of their videos the model is shown already tied up, suspended or whatever without ever showing how she got there. Then thereís just the basic stuff of a BDSM or D/s relationship dynamic that seems fascinating. Members to any of Kinkís sites didnít usually get to peek behind the curtains. And then along comes Kink University and that niche is filled.

Itís important to note that Kink isn't a traditional hardcore sex site, though there is sex here. It isn't a typical BDSM, D/s site either. All of the videos have an instructional element to them regarding the BDSM and D/s activities seen throughout Kink sites. Youíll find videos on rope tying for beginners and for more advanced couples, videos on how to safely use some toys, how to build a home dungeon and how to have anal sex. There are also videos on how to get into the lifestyle, how to use positions and protocols. In short, if you can see it on a Kink site there is probably a video at KU giving you advice on how to bring that home.

If youíre a Kink regular the models here are those youíll be familiar with. Kink seems to have a group of semi-mainstream-porn models who do a lot of fetish work and those models appear here too.

Production values like lighting, sound and editing are all typical of Kink sites, which is to say that they are among the best in the industry. Kink obviously cares about putting out good videos.

The site is currently fairly small but given the uniqueness of the niche I canít fault it for that. There are currently 51 videos available and a new one is added each week.

Clicking on a thumbnail for a scene opens another page where you have the option to stream or download it. I didnít see any resolution options for streaming. Downloads are mostly offered in MP4 version with four resolutions being offered, those being listed as hi, med, low and Ďfullí which is HD. Because of the nature of the videos I opted for the Ďhií files since they were the best compromise between file size and resolution. Those come in at a fairly low (by todayís standards) resolution of 960x540 and 1300kb/s. They donít look bad on a 24Ē monitor or a 32Ē TV. I avoided the full HD downloads because they tended to be up to three times the size of the next lower file. I did download one HD file to be able to compare the specs and it came in at 1280x720 and 5000kb/s. Those specs aren't bad but Iíd expect better in a 50 minute video that is close to 2GB in size. I wish the gap between the files wasnít so big.

The site allows download managers and I had no trouble with the links timing out too quickly. I havenít had any Kink memberships in a while but I donít recall download speeds being this slow in the past. In the past I donít recall download speeds being remarkable for being slow or fast, but my experience with this site is that they are far slower than Iím used to seeing elsewhere. But maybe Iím just hitting the site at the wrong times.

Other Kink sites Iíve been a member at have offered photos but I donít see any photos here. Maybe Iím missing them.

I know some of my comments here have seemed a bit inconclusive and thereís a reason for that: it appears that starting a few days ago Kink has started to roll out a new look for all of their sites. I found their old look to be simple, effective and easy to use. Maybe itís just that the look is new and will take some getting used to. Right now though, the site redesign looks like it was done just to give it a fresh look. For all I know maybe members were complaining that the site looked stale, but Iíll always be opposed to change for the sake of change.

One spin-off advantage to having a membership here is that it is among the lowest priced Kink sites. Thatís important since once you are a member to one site you get a discounted price to all their other sites. I usually join through the cheapest site Iím interested in and then over a period of a few months rejoin other Kink sites that I like at a discount. I can save a lot of money this way.

Like so many other sites any recommendation has to be objective. This site offers 51 scenes (and growing) in a niche that isn't found anywhere else (that Iím aware of), the models are good looking and the production values are high. Objectively I can definitely recommend this site. Subjectively, well thatís your call obviously. BDSM and D/s videos are still considered outside the mainstream for porn so the market isn't huge, and the market for this site is further reduced because not everyone into BDSM and D/s would be into these Ďinstructionalí videos. But if you do have even a passing interest in this kind of video I recommend giving it a try.

05-13-15  04:19pm

Replies (0)
Review
13
Visit My Very First Time

My Very First Time
(1)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Some fresh models early in their careers
- Lots of download and streaming options
- Good production values
- TBP Discount
Cons: - Small site
- Updates are very slow to arrive
- Site will remain small unless the update schedule is increased
- Download speeds varied
- Would be better off as part of a network
Bottom Line: When I saw this site listed as a new site on TBP I signed up. Iím a big fan of collecting Ďfirsts,í and especially collecting first anals. I knew this would be a small site since it was just starting out but I had high hopes that it would develop into a great site for this rare niche. And the fact that the site is affiliated with Porn Pros gave me some comfort too. I went into the membership with my eyes open and the scenes are good but unless one fatal flaw is fixed this site isn't worth the membership right now.

There are currently only nine scenes uploaded. For a new site in a narrow niche thatís to be expected though. The problem specific to this site is that it appears that they only add one new scene per month. When the site started they added one new scene every three days and then they went a month before a new scene was added. Unless they pick up the pace this site will be a low value for a while.

The scenes themselves are well done. All of the models are typical porn cupcakes in that they are young (18-20), petite and natural. Several of the models will be added to my list of favorites and I hope to see a lot more of them in the future.

Of the nine scenes one is billed as the modelís first scene ever, one is the modelís first interracial scene, two are each modelís first (vaginal only) gang bang and five are the modelís first anal scenes.

The videos are available in streaming or as a download. Streaming is available in two resolutions. Downloads are available as MP4s in 1080p, 720p and 480p, as a 480p MPG1 and as a 720p WMV. I downloaded the 720p MP4s and those come in at 1280x720 and 2,600 kb/s. While the bitrate is low there is no pixilation at all and the video looks sharp.

Photos are available too Ė as singles or as a zip. The zipped photos are 1500x1000.

The site allows download managers and I didnít have any issue using one. Download speeds varied from average to poor Ė I often saw download speeds drop below 1MB/s. (The site seems to be affiliated with Porn Pros and I have that same issue there too.)

So would I recommend the site? Probably not, unless you really need to have one or more of the scenes. Even with the TBP discount this site isn't a good value and unless they start updating more often itíll be a long time before it is a good value. This is an under-served niche and the site could be a great stand-alone site if it was updating more frequently. As it is now, however, the site would be far a better option as part of a larger network.

05-10-15  11:56am

Replies (1)
Review
14
Visit Finishes The Job

Finishes The Job
(1)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 1400+ scenes in an under-served niche
- Updates daily
- Lots of A-list models
- Good ability to sort scenes
- Downloads and streaming available
- Photos are available
Cons: - Download speeds range from average to abysmal but tend to be lower than average
- Download managers are a little problematic
- Scene resolution is lower than average
Bottom Line: I suspect that most porn buyers are like me and wish that this niche didnít need to exist. But in a world where so many porn money shots are the guy jerking off on the girl this site is needed. The whole premise of the site is that the girls finish the guys off in every scene. (Thatís the premise, but there are scenes where the usual happens.)

Iíll start with what this site does well Ė its good porn. The scenes feature top porn models and the scenes are all fairly hot and fun to watch. And there aren't many jerk-off sessions either Ė most of these girls do finish the job.

This site is really made up of three distinct sub-sites: Mano Job, which features handjobs, The Dick Suckers, which features blowjobs, and Mr. POV which features hardcore b/g sex. Itís a great idea to break the scenes down into those sub-genres because many people may prefer one niche over the others. I find handjobs boring to watch, for example, so I could filter those out if I wanted to.

The site currently has 1400+ scenes available with a new one added every day, making it a good value. In case anyone is interested, Mano Job has 850+ scenes, The Dick Sucker has 300+ scenes and Mr. POV has 280+ scenes.)

The volume of great porn is enough for me to recommend the site, but to allow prospective members to make an informed decision you should know that the site has some flaws. These are, in no particular order:
ē The download speeds vary wildly. I could download a scene and see 15MB/s and then download immediately after and see less than 1MB/s. I could understand if I was downloading at peak times and consistently got slow speeds but that wasnít the case. I tried different times and would get different speeds regularly. Most downloads came in at the slower end of things at about 2MB/s. In my opinion, the download speeds are the greatest flaw here. While I could hit average speeds, in most cases the downloads were well below average speeds expected in 2015.
ē Scene quality varied. The scenes had multiple download options but most offered 1080p. The 1080p quality wasnít consistent: on some scenes it was true 1080 and on others it was lower.
ē Video quality isn't the best. Iím not a tech guy but most of the scenes were a little fuzzy with some pixilation Ė and this is with downloading the best resolution available. I also found that there was a narrow band at the bottom of many of the scenes that was badly pixilated.
ē Download managers are supported but may cause issues. Iíd normally queue up scenes but since the site doesnít allow downloads to be stopped and resume I played it safe and downloaded individually.

Scene resolution varies too, but some of that is to be expected since the site has been around for 10 years. Most of the newer scenes are good with 1920x1080 at 6200kb/s and 1280x720 at 2800kb/s being common. Some scenes are lower at 1024x768 at 2500kb/s. There are even some really low resolution scene tossed into the mix but thankfully these seem rare. These are 320x240. Some older scenes are remastered and uploaded as a new scene. While I donít have a problem with that, these remastered scenes are often fuzzy and pixilated. A problem that the site seems to have is the bitrate they use which is only half of that used by many other sites. I suspect the low bitrate is the culprit for the reduced quality. The file types aren't listed but I always chose one of the two best resolutions depending on file size and those were all in MP4 format.

Streaming is also available in multiple resolutions.

The site also offers some interesting options: apart from the full scene you could stream or download just the money shot (sometimes also offered in slow-motion) and an interview with the model.

The site has a list of tags for all the common niches so itís easy to sort for anything youíre looking for. You can also sort by models.

Photos are also available, as singles or as a zip. The photos are 1500x1000 which wonít impress any serious collector, but it is fair to say that this is more of a video site than a photo site.

The TBP review says the Terms of Reference mentions a download limit but doesnít put a number on it. I canít confirm this, but if there is a limit it has to be fairly high. I downloaded close to 50GB in one day trying to find the limit but was never locked out or prevented from downloading.

Overall I still recommend the site because the good outweighs the bad. This is an under-served niche (which only shows how crappy a lot of porn is these days) and has more than 1400 scenes available on a well-organized site. The download speeds are well below average and the resolution quality could be better, but the site is worth checking out if you can put up with those flaws. I canít however, give it my highest rating which is to say that this is a site Iíll rejoin. I donít regret joining once, but the speeds and video quality issues are enough to make it unlikely that Iíll rejoin.

04-12-15  07:07am

Replies (4)
Review
15
Visit POV Wars

POV Wars
(1)

83.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Very rare niche (Iíve never seen another site that specializes in it)
- Lots of videos
- Amateur models
- Bundled with another good site (Glory Hole Secrets)
- Options for streaming and downloading
- Photos available
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Some of the models aren't typical porn models (which some may consider a good thing)
Bottom Line: I wouldnít normally write a full review for a site that is bundled with another site, but POV Wars merits an exception. For one, many may see this as the primary site and Glory Hole Secrets as the add-on. For another, itís in an unusual niche that people may have an interest in but not be aware that there is a site that caters to it.

So what is this unusual niche? Itís a bit hard to describe but may be best described as one girl and five guys. But it isn't a gangbang site; the guys have sex with the girl one after the other and each session forms a different scene. Each modelís Ďsessioní starts with her sitting on a couch and being interviewed. Then the first guy comes in and from then on most of the scene is shot POV style, with some shots from a camerman. The guy and girl chat a bit, she undresses, goes down on him, they have sex and he finishes, usually with an oral with swallow. Then the next guy comes in and the process starts over again. If this happens to be important to anyone, the girl is dressed at the beginning each segment. So the best way to describe the niche is that itís Ďgirls pulling a trainí if such a niche exists.

Itís difficult to say precisely how many scenes are here because, for one thing, the set-up lends itself to at least two interpretations of what a scene is. Is a scene all five sessions with one model or is a scene one session and each model then has five scenes? The definition is further blurred because most of the Ďscenesí are broken down into five Ďsessionsí each downloaded or streamed separately while some scenes are downloaded or streamed as the full scene with all five Ďsessionsí in the same download. Confused? Hereís what I can say for sure: there are currently 167 videos available to upload featuring 42 models. Some of those are full-length scenes but most are broken down into separate sessions with each guy. It does appear that since the beginning of 2015 all of the new scenes added are full-length with all five Ďsessionsí in the download.

One new scene per week is uploaded.

The same models here are those found on the sister site, Glory Hole Secrets. Thatís good and bad because if you like true amateurs youíll like this site but many of the women donít fit the typical porn ideal. Thatís not good or bad, itís just a fact. There are different ages and body types represented.

Streaming is available in two different resolutions, one which is labelled as HD. I donít use streaming so I canít give an opinion on that. Downloads (all MP4) are available in 1920x1080 at 6000kb/s, 1280x720 at 3500kb/s, 960x540 and an unspecified resolution for phones and devices. While the bitrates are lower than Iíd expect for the screen resolutions they still look good.

I donít think anyone would consider this a photo site but they do offer photos for those who are interested. Currently there are 21 photo sets available (these appear to be of the full scene with all five guys). Photos sets had been uploaded weekly but stopped in December 2014 so if you join for photos there may not be any updates coming. Photos are available as singles or zips in either 1920x1080 or 1280x720.

The site uses a simple layout which is all that it needs. You can sort by scene, by model or by tag. With a niche this narrow you really donít need a lot more.

This site has a lot going for it: it has enough available to make it a decent value on a site that is simple to use with good download speeds and it supports download managers. It also comes bundled with Glory Hole Secrets which is a good glory hole site. But what makes the site stand out is the niche it offers. Iím not aware of any other site that focuses solely on this kind of scene and for that reason alone many people may consider joining. For all of these reasons Iíd recommend checking the site out.

04-09-15  04:28pm

Replies (0)
Review
16
Visit Gloryhole Secrets

Gloryhole Secrets
(1)

87.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 192 videos
- 3 new scenes added per week
- Allows download managers
- Many scenes have two videos Ė one standard and one POV
- Mostly amateurs but a few known faces
Cons: - Some of the amateur models aren't up to usual porn expectations (though some may consider that a good thing)
Bottom Line: Glory Hole Secrets looks a lot like the other dedicated glory hole site, Glory Hole Swallow. Where Swallow goes into actual adult theatres Secrets appears to have a purpose-built room for taping. I prefer the added raunchiness of the actual theatre but this site is hot too.

Being a glory hole site means the scenes are all predictable: the model answers a few questions and then gets to work on the dicks that come through holes in the wall on either side of her. Most of the models get naked or nearly naked and in a few scenes the model bends over and gets fucked too. Most of the cumshots are oral and most of the models swallow. There is a Ďcumshot counterí that pops up briefly with every pop shot so you can keep track if youíre so inclined. (I like this, but GH Swallow does it better by leaving the counter up all the time from the first pop shot to the end of the scene. GH Secrets only leaves it up for a few seconds while the guy is coming.)

The site is fairly large with 192 scenes available and three new scenes being added each week. That update schedule is ambitious and will cause the site to grow fairly quickly and if you have an interest in this niche it might be worth a recurring membership.

The site relies mostly on unknown amateurs and that can be good or bad. Many of the models aren't A-list hot but if you like your porn with more natural women getting nasty then youíll like this. The looks, body types and ages of the models vary here so there is likely something for most tastes.

There are options for how you view a scene. There is HD and SD streaming and downloads are available in 1920x1080 (6000kb/s), 1280x720 (3500kb/s) 960x540 and an unspecified resolution for phones. All the downloads are in MP4 format. For having relatively low bitrates both the 1080p and 720p files look good.

I had no problem using a download manager.

One feature of the site that I quite like is the option to download more than one version of the same scene. This isn't an option with all scenes, it would be the minority that offer this, but you can get the standard view with the cameraman standing near the model and recording and you can get a POV view with a camera located about eye level above the glory hole.

The site layout is simple and effective and gives the option to sort the scenes in several ways. You can also sort by model too. No matter how you sort the scenes there is only one thumbnail on which to make a decision to check it out or not. With amateur models thatís important to me because the thumbnail may not be the best representation. The thumbnail may be a pretty face but she has triple-D breasts which Iím not interested in. This can be solved by clicking on the photo link for each scene to get a better look at the model. Iíd prefer to see a better thumbnail of the models though.

As I noted above, photos are available. I wouldnít call this a photo site but they do offer high quality photos for those who are interested. You can download a zip of photos in 1920x1080 resolution or view them as singles in either 1920x1080 or 1280x720.

Membership gives access to two sites, this and POV Wars (that site is unique and deserves its own review).

Iíd definitely recommend this site for fans of the niche. The site is well laid out, there is plenty of material here to make it a good value and the scenes look good and have some heat to them. Itís a decent value and if you like this kind of porn you should really check it out.

04-05-15  05:03pm

Replies (6)
Review
17
Visit Punish Teens

Punish Teens
(1)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Excellent quality scenes
- Appears to be all exclusive
- Download options
- Supports download managers
- Updates weekly
- TBP discount
Cons: - Very small site
- Relatively tame for this niche
- Grossly misleading tour page
- Big gap between HD and hi res
Bottom Line: I know not everyone will agree with me on this, but I think that small porn sites can still offer good value. I regularly join mega sites and like those, but I also like joining new niche sites to see what they have and support the site owners who have taken a risk and opened a new site. This is a niche I like so it seemed like a good fit and the TBP discount coupled with a reputable biller took a lot of the risk out of the equation.

Iíll address the gorilla in the room that often occurs with new sites: this one is still very small with just seven scenes currently available. A new scene is added once a week so it will be a long time growing too. I realize that for many people having a site this small would be an instant deal breaker and Iíd agree with that if the site aimed at the middle of the porn market. But itís different, or at least should be, with niche sites. Unfortunately the site missed the target on the niche and created their Achilles heel.

The problem with the scenes is that they fall on the tame side for this niche. The reason I think that is a problem is that with a name like Punish Teens they are not likely to get artcore buyers interested and for fans of this niche these are about the most tame Iíve seen. This isn't Kink or Society SM (and I realize that this site doesnít market itself as a BDSM site) but it is likely that a prospective member would expect more than the light bondage and D/s play found here. These teens aren't really being punished as much as theyíre being mildly reprimanded.

The scenes themselves have high production values and appear to be exclusive. Six of the scenes have American models while one appears to be Russian or eastern European. The lighting and editing are top level.

The site itself is simple and effective, but with seven scenes why would be it be anything else? The main page has a large photo taken from the scenes and the options for streaming or downloading are all right there. There are several download options: MP4s are available in 1920x1080 at 10,000kb/s, 960x540 at 2500kb/s and 640x360 at 700kb/s. One WMV is available at 960x540 at 2500kb/s. This may be a bit nit-picky, but there is too big a gap between the highest resolution and the next highest. Iím not normally one to criticize having options, but it seems to me that they would do well to offer a 1280x720 option to bridge that wide gap.

Photos are also available (photos and screencaps) as singles or zips. The photos are 1350x900 and they look okay but photo collectors aren't likely to be overly impressed by those specs.

One thing that does deserve a comment is that the tour page is grossly misleading. A prospective member sees 42 thumbnails on the main page which would seem to indicate that there are 42 or more scenes inside. I read the TBP page so I was aware that this was misleading and didnít have a nasty surprise when I joined. Further, the site uses the annoying tactic of sending you to the join page wherever you click. There is no tour that might better reflect the true size of the site.

I used a download manager and had no problems with it. I didnít encounter any download limits but that isn't a conclusive answer since I downloaded all seven scenes in HD and that was only 15GB of data.

This is purely subjective and I wonít factor it into the score, but there is only one anal scene here. Anal sex is common in this niche (apparently itís an effective way to punish a teenÖ) but not here. This should be another indicator that this site leans to the softer side of this niche.

The biggest dilemma for me is whether or not Iíd recommend this site. On one hand I like to support new sites and they do have some high quality porn here. But on the other hand the site is still very small. Size alone wouldnít be an impediment to my recommending the site since it is a niche site, but the real deal-breaker is that the scenes miss their target. I think theyíre too hard to attract the artcore, couples-oriented buyer but they aren't hard enough to keep members like me coming back. As much as Iíd like to recommend the site I canít because they missed the target by a wide margin.

03-29-15  10:55am

Replies (2)
Review
18
Visit Third Movies

Third Movies
(1)

88.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Some big improvements since I last was a member
- Large selection of great porn
- Close to 2000 DVDs available (in total)
- One new scene uploaded per day
- Lots of options to stream or download the scenes
- Supports download managers
- TBP/PU discount
Cons: - Not a true network
- Lists a lesbian site with the included sites but I canít access it
- Download speeds can vary but usually slower than average
Bottom Line: If I could give an award for biggest improvement in a site this site would win. The last time I reviewed it I found that while the porn was great the site needed some serious work. I was pleased to see that the site has received a lot of work and is substantially improved from when I last reviewed it in 2011. They kept what I viewed as positive and either threw out or fixed the things I saw as negative.

There is a note on the main page dated from December 30, 2014 that says the Ďnewí site is undergoing beta testing. While itís now almost three months later and most of the site seems to work fine there are still some issues that occur sporadically that indicate that it is still being tweaked. When I first joined there were huge numbers of dead links (that was temporary) and today a lot of the DVD box covers are missing. I donít think these temporary quirks are enough to justify skipping the site if you like the porn they offer.

The two main studio Ďsitesí here are 3rd Degree (Third Movies) and Zero Tolerance (ZTOD). Both of these are mainstream hardcore porn studios that are known for featuring top A-list models and great production values. The porn aims for the middle of the market being harder than Elegant Angel but softer than Evil Angel.

The site bills itself as providing access to four separate sites but thatís a bit misleading. As with many studio sites there is a division into different Ďsitesí but the same material is shared across two of them. The one site where there are separate titles is Black Ice where there are 242 DVDs uploaded. Black Ice is an all-black site as opposed to an interracial site which is great since black/black porn is relatively rare. The bad news about Black Ice is that the site hasnít added a new scene since 2011.

The fourth site that is listed as included when you join is a lesbian site called ďHow to Kiss a Girl.Ē I tried repeatedly to enter the site with the login information that worked on the other sites and had no success. (This may be a sporadic issue related to the site redesign.)

Because there are so many DVDs shared between the two main sites it is hard to say how many are available here, but it is in excess of 1500 DVDs, not including whatís on Black Ice.

As this is primarily a video site there are lots of options available to view the videos. The newer videos have four streaming and five download options. Streaming is 1080p, 720p, 360p and ďiPod.Ē Downloads are 1080p, 720p, 360p, iPod and WMV. The 1080p are 1920x1080, 10000+kb/s, the 720p are 1280x720, 4800kb/s and the 360p are 640x360 at 1300kb/s. I canít give specs on the WMV files because they were much larger than the MP4 files, with some coming in at more than 4GB compared to 2GB for the MP4s.

Obviously older DVDs have fewer options and the best isn't great by todayís standards. Since the available DVDs go back more than a decade I wonít complain about that though.

This isn't really a photo site but screencaps are available.

The last time I was a member I had a lot of complaints about the site that could be summarized as a too-basic site design and a lot of broken links. Iím pleased to report that both of those problems seem to be solved now. The site redesign looks good and is effectively laid out. The search functions now work, there are tags and niches and you can sort the scenes in any of several ways. There are still a few broken links but nothing like the amount there used to be.

The site updates with a new scene per day. To pad their numbers a bit they use a different thumbnail and description when they upload it to each of the main sites. Black Ice doesnít update and since I canít access the lesbian site I canít comment on that.

Download managers are permitted and I had no issue with links timing out. While download speeds started off faster than average they quickly trailed off to lower than average speeds.

I recommended the site the last time I reviewed it because the great porn outweighed the siteís flaws. This review doesnít need to rely on any such compromises. The porn is still great and now the site design supports the porn rather than lets it down. At full price it would be a decent value but with the TBP discount itís a great value. I recommend joining even more than last time.

03-25-15  03:56pm

Replies (0)
Review
19
Visit Twistys

Twistys
(4)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Huge site (7000+ videos)
- Photos and videos
- Several resolutions offered
- Updates daily
- Good navigation and search functions
- Allows download managers
- TBP/PU discount
Cons: - Wide gap in file sizes between medium and high resolution
- Download speeds vary but are mostly slower than average
- Primarily a solo girl site
Bottom Line: Iíve been an active internet porn buyer for more than 15 years and I had to ask myself why Iíd never joined Twistyís since it seems to be one of the larger and more popular sites around. So I joined. I realize that a lot of any reaction to a site is subjective and my subjective response to the site is that it lacks any real heat. In is recent review of the site, Graymane hit the nail on the head when he noted that the site seems to be lacking heat. For me, I think a lot of that lack of heat comes from the fact that this isn't the kind of site Iíd usually join. Objectively itís a great site, but subjectively it isn't for me.

The site uses a Ďtrickí commonly used by many sites in that it sells itself as a network when it really isn't. Thatís not necessarily a bad thing, but there is a main site where everything in available and then the Ďsitesí allow you to filter the scenes and photos further. For example, all the hardcore scenes can be filtered by selecting the Ďsiteí called ďTwistyís Hard.Ē

The site is huge with more close to 7700 videos uploaded. 385 of those feature b/g hardcore sex. 186 are lesbian and the remainder are solo girl. The site caters to photo collectors too, with equal emphasis on photos. (Iíd prefer to tell you exactly how many photo sets are available but I ran out of patience. The site only allows the user to advance two pages at a time and after advancing through almost 400 pages of videos two pages at a time I just couldnít bring myself to do that again. This is a minor flaw that should be fixed.)

I collect videos so this review will be on that part of the site.

The videos are mostly offered in three resolutions, 240, 480 and 720. Ordinarily Iíd opt for the 720 for quality but I always look for a balance of resolution and file size. A problem with the site is that there is a vast chasm between the file sizes for the 480 and the 720 resolutions. It wasnít unusual to have a scene where the 480 resolution was 500MB and the 720 was more than 2GB. Because of that difference I opted to go with the 480 and those are 1024x576 and 3000kb/s. There are some scenes that offer a fourth resolution of 1080 and with those there tends to be less of a gap between the 480 and 720 files. I canít say how many scenes offer the 1080 resolution because they aren't marked and it isn't an option on even most of the newest updates.

Speaking of updates, the site doesnít disappoint in that there is one new video and one photo set added per day.

The site allows download managers and I had no problem using one. I had no issues with links timing out but most of my links were never more than a half hour old anyway. I didnít encounter any download limits. One problem I did encounter was a wide variation in download speeds. There were times when I saw downloads as fast as 15MB/s but there were a lot more times when the speeds were lower than 3MB/s.

My three biggest complaints about the site are purely subjective and I havenít factored them into the score. Depending on your tastes these may be seen as positives for you. The site is primarily a solo girl site and that isn't something that I collect. I find solo scenes boring because they lack any interaction with another person. I find that interaction, when done right, creates a sexual tension and for me thatís where the heat comes from. Second, the site seems to favor models with large breasts, whether theyíre real or fake. This is especially true of the older videos as the newer ones do seem to have a bit better balance between smaller-breasted models and ginormous-breasted models. The final complaint is that there aren't a lot of anal scenes and those that are offered are mostly older and with European models. (As an aside, searching for anal scenes will bring up hundreds, but they include solo scenes in that count too. To be fair, once you get the search results for anal you can then further sort by site and selecting ďTwistyís HardĒ will give you all the hardcore scenes. If youíre interested in this niche, there are only 23.)

Overall the site is well laid out and it is relatively easy to find what youíre looking for. You can sort by model, there is an effective search function and they use tags effectively. Navigating is easy here.

The bottom line is that this is a great site as long as you know in advance what youíre getting: the site is primarily a solo girl site that offers both videos and photo sets and they add in some hardcore b/g and lesbian to keep things interesting and to offer something for everyone. The site has some flaws but overall they do more right than they do wrong. I wonít be back (for the subjective reasons Iíve noted) but I would recommend the site to someone who likes solo girl stuff with a sprinkling of relatively tame hardcore. The site certainly delivers on that.

03-15-15  08:43am

Replies (2)
Review
20
Visit Digital Playground

Digital Playground
(2)

82.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large studio
- Big-budget, plot-based DVDs
- 500+ DVDs
- DVDs appear to be complete
- A whoís who of A-list models
- A lot of scenes with normal clothes and makeup
- DVDs ranging from 2005 to 2014
- Updates regularly
- 50% TBP/PU discount
Cons: - Streaming only
- Emphasis on models with large breasts (real and fake) Ė this wonít be a negative for everyone
- Older videos stream in lower resolution
- Older videos download the whole movie to your cache, which could be an issue for those with caps
- Tags donít appear to be effective in finding scenes
Bottom Line: There are two things any prospective member should know before considering a membership here. The first is that the site offers streaming only (though a recent comment stated that with the right software the HTTP stream can be captured). The second is that this studio specializes in plot-based porn, some of it with a big budget and location shoots. If you prefer gonzo this might seem a bit tame for you. (One advantage to plot-based porn is that when the plot involves normal life Ė as opposed to pirates, for example Ė the modelís clothes and makeup are more natural. This is big plus for me. Iíd rather see a model in jeans and light makeup than wearing PVC clothes and garish makeup.)

The site is fairly standard for a studio site and it has many of the same flaws that other studio sites have. While the porn itself is quite good, the site lets it down. Digital Playground is a lot better than some other studio sites, but not as good as many exclusive sites.

The site currently has just over 500 DVDs available. It certainly looks like all the scenes in each DVD are available. There is also the ability to sort by scene and while most of those scenes can be associated with a DVD it does appear that some of the scenes are (for now, at least) not part of a DVD. It may be that the scenes get assembled into the DVD once theyíre all uploaded. It looks like there is one scene uploaded each day although there does appear to be the occasional gap.

As can be expected with any website that has material ranging from 2005 to 2014 the quality of the older stuff is less than the newer stuff. Most of the older DVDs are available in four resolutions: 720, 576, 480 and 320. New DVDs are available in 1080, 720, 480 and 320. Approximately 25% of the videos offered (and all of the new uploads) have the 1080p option.

I donít normally join streaming sites, but one thing I noticed with the older movies could be an issue for some members. Even though you could select a specific scene from a movie, clicking on that scene started streaming the entire movie from the beginning. While itís inconvenient to have to scrub ahead when youíve already selected the scene you want, for those with a download cap this means youíre using unnecessary bandwidth to see a scene. This problem doesnít seem to occur on any movie where the 1080p stream is offered. On those the specific scene you want is queued up.

Another quibble is that the tags donít work well. There is an extensive list of possible tags so I selected Ďanalí to get a sense of how many anal DVDs there were. The result was six DVDs. That was disappointing, but not entirely unexpected as Digital Playground does seem relatively more couple-friendly than other studios. But it turns out there is a lot more anal here than the tags revealed. The tags donít appear to be an effective way to sort scenes.

A definite advantage to the site is that since this is one of the major studios and itís been around a long time, their cast lists are usually a whoís who of A-list models. They also have a few exclusive models.

Speaking of models, this is a subjective complaint, but the studio tends to shoot larger-breasted women than I prefer. Many of them are natural, but a lot are enhanced. (Teagan Presley, a favorite of mine, has a lot of scenes here but they are almost all post-surgery.) If you like A-list models with bigger breasts though, this site should be considered.

The site isn't perfect but it does have more hits than misses. The streaming-only is likely a deal-breaker for many, but that may be offset by the 50% discount offered through TBP/PU. A membership gives you access to some big-budget porn with some of the biggest names in the business. This is a definite Ďmaybeí for a rejoin but as long as youíre okay with streaming Iíd recommend checking it out.

01-27-15  03:49pm

Replies (2)
Review
21
Visit Broke Model

Broke Model
(1)

68.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Good mix of models
- Appears to update regularly
- Videos and photos available
- Streaming and downloads
- Options available for streaming and downloads
- A few pregnant models (if youíre into that)
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Model treatment leans to Misogynist side of scale
- Six-hour download limit (but reasonable)
- Some recent uploads are full scenes of older segments
- Some models have only photos
Bottom Line: This site follows the same formula used by several other sites where it appears to be a small operation. The scenes are shot by a mix of POV and tripod mounted cameras and the models are relative unknowns or are at least in the beginning of their career. This style is used successfully by sites like Exploited College Girls and Amateur Allure and with less success by sites like Broke Amateurs. Unfortunately I have to add Broke Models to the lower end of the scale for the same reason that Broke Models is there: while the porn itself is decent the site is flawed. As an armchair critic Iíll never understand why site owners make some of the choices that they do.

First the good news: the site does offer some good porn if you like this niche. I like that the models are relative unknowns and range from nervous to confident. Their looks and body types exist on a range but all are relatively petite. If you like some color in your models you wonít find it here as they are almost all Caucasian with a few Latina women thrown in. For those of you who like pregnant models youíll find a couple here. (Dani Jensen and Jodi Taylor seem to be this only A-list models here.)

The scenes are structured in the same way used by many of these sites (and I should add that the maleís voice is familiar so he may be behind other sites too). The scene usually starts with the model fully dressed on a bed while she is interviewed. Eventually her clothes come off and the fun begins. The camera work isn't bad, but POV and tripods have limitations so donít expect award-winning camera work here.

A trait I donít like in my porn is common here, namely rude treatment of the models. This could be staged though. I contrast the written scene descriptions at Amateur Allure, which may say something like ďHere today is a stunningly beautiful model from FloridaÖĒ to the written descriptions here which tend to be more like ďTodayís skanky whore is from FloridaÖĒ The same goes for their on-screen treatment. Admittedly, AA and BM aren't really competitors but I used this for a comparison. I also have to admit that for comparison choosing AA may be unfair as they do use some stunningly beautiful models whereas sites like this seem to recruit from a lower strata in the model hierarchy.

Another trait I donít like (mostly because it adds nothing to the scene for me) is the use of the Ďsurpriseí creampie. This is used a lot at Back Room Casting Couch too. These may be staged, but the premise is that the models aren't expecting to have the guy come in them and some of them aren't happy about it. I think the intended effect is further debasing the models and that isn't something Iím into (unless itís part of a BDSM scene where it fits into the context).

I canít say for sure how many actual scenes are available on the site through its safe to say there are about 65 scenes. The reason I canít say for sure is because of a bit of a fast one the site pulls. With older uploads (and theyíre not dated so it isn't easy to give specific details) the scenes were broken into segments. But in some cases the more recent uploads are simply those segments joined together as the complete scene. Apart from passing off an older scene as a new one, I downloaded duplicates without realizing it. Several times I was pleased to see more by a model I liked only to be disappointed that it wasnít different. The other problem with this practice is that the site has a download cap of approximately 15GB per six hour period. Iím no fan of download limits but I can live with reasonable ones like this. But when there are duplicate scenes that aren't labelled as such that eats into your allotment.

Another problem with the download limit is that while it is supposed to reset automatically after six hours on one occasion it didnít. Given that there is a message telling the user how to contact support for this very problem I assume it occurs fairly frequently.

I canít give an exact update schedule but it looks like a new scene is added weekly. The most recent update is a new scene and not one stitched together from older segments.

There are three listed download resolutions though for some reason two of them are the same. I downloaded the highest available (WMV) which came in at 1280x720 and 5000kb/s. They look good on a 24Ē monitor.

The site offers photos too, and while Iíd normally consider that a good thing in this case I was disappointed to see that many of the models only have photos and no videos. The photos are 1800x1200 and are available in zips.

I had no trouble using a download manager.

The bottom line is that this is some good (but not great) porn thatís let down by the site. If you like scenes like this with relatively unknown models in well-shot amateur scenes then this may be worth a look. The price makes it a fair value but I suspect that this will be a one-time-only membership for me.

01-02-15  12:36pm

Replies (0)
Review
22
Visit Legal Porno

Legal Porno
(1)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 01-03-15  01:36pm  (Update History)
Reason: One paragraph in the original was incorrect based on comments from other PU members. The paragraph provides accurate information now.
Pros: - 1500+ Ďfreeí scenes
- Some unique porn Ė if what they shoot is what youíre interested in
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Unique business model that wonít attract any fans
- Can get VERY expensive
- Website is poorly organized
- Many scenes donít have female talent listed
- Search function isn't effective
Bottom Line: Let me get one thing out of the way first: my opinion on this site is vastly different from pat362ís and I want to explain why. Patís comments are true, accurate and valid and if he hadnít posted those I would have not known that this site was VERY different from everything else Iíve ever joined. If I hadnít had the information that pat posted I would have written the same thing as he did. BUTÖ having been forewarned by pat that this site uses a completely different business model I was prepared for that and willing to join anyway. Iím grateful for patís comment since I went in with the full knowledge of what I was getting.

Further to the above, I think it is more accurate to think of this site as a store rather than a normal porn site. You pay your membership fee and that gets you access to 1500+ free scenes but if you want the newest stuff (less than a year old) you have to pay an additional amount. The flaw is that this can be an expensive way to get porn. But if this is the kind of porn you like then youíll like it a lot.

One aspect that pat commented on was the Ďattestationí requirement. After you buy a membership you have to prove that you own the credit card you used. The process is simple: the site deducts a small amount from your card. You log on to your bank, confirm the amount and report that back to the LP site. The amount is refunded. The process took me less than five minutes. The process is an attempt to limit piracy.

The second thing I should mention before I get into details is that this isn't mainstream porn that will interest everyone. Most of the scenes here push the limits of hardcore. Most of the scenes are at least threeways and scenes that donít feature anal sex are rare. Youíll also find milk and cream enema and pee play. The scenes are definitely NOT artcore.

You can choose different levels of membership with the difference being how many premium tickets you want to buy upfront. Once youíre a member there are three different Ďclassesí of videos Ė the premium ones that you buy with the tickets you get with a membership, the ex-premium ones that you buy with free tickets (you get one free ticket per day when youíre a member) and the free videos you have access to through your membership that you need no tickets for. It appears that videos that require paid tickets move to requiring free tickets after a year. It doesnít appear that the premium videos ever become completely free with a membership.

The site itself is a giant clusterfuck that needs to made more intuitive. I got used to it but it can be improved. Scene a model naming are a constant problem with generic meaningless names being given to scenes. Since Russian and Eastern European models change their names more than their socks I canít entirely blame the site for that, but itís still annoying.

Newer videos are available in two resolutions Ė 640x480 and 1280x720. Both are MP4. Older videos are only available in the lower resolution. I downloaded the higher resolution and those have a bitrate of 4500/kb/s so they look decent. The older scenes have a 2500 bitrate and they look okay too. Trailers are available, as are photos.

Many of the older Ďfreeí scenes are available elsewhere (like Videobox) but the resolutions here are usually higher than at other sites.

I used a download manager and had no issues with it. Download speeds varied and there were some times when the speeds were slow but most of the time they were okay. Sometimes they were fast.

You can buy scenes individually without a membership. One piece of advice is that if you do want to buy a few scenes work out the cost and compare it to a membership. Buying scenes individually is VERY expensive with that cost being about 3 times the cost of the tickets for the same scenes.

I found scoring the site to be difficult and I finally settled on a fairly low score mostly for objective reasons. The biggest of those is that the site isn't easy to use: it could use a major overhaul. If I factored in my subjective opinion on the quality of the porn the score would have been higher. If you like your porn with a harder edge youíll love the porn even if you donít like the process to get it. I know the biggest criticism of the site will be having to pay for newer scenes, but think of the membership fee as giving access to 1500+ scenes and you can buy the newest scenes.

Iíd recommend the site with four caveats: go in knowing that the porn is a lot harder than whatís available at most other sites, that the site itself is illogical, that unless youíre willing to spend a lot of money youíll be leaving the newest scenes behind and finally that business model is unlike any other porn site. If you do decide to join go in with your eyes open. Iím glad I joined and Iíll probably rejoin again.

12-27-14  09:03am

Replies (26)
Review
23
Visit Massive Access

Massive Access
(1)

69.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large catalogue of DVDs and scenes
- Rarely served niches available here
- Huge range of tags for sorting scenes
- Access to many older titles
- TBP/PU discount
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Very little HD material offered
- Most scenes are low resolution
- Over-reliance on compilations
- Scenes aren't linked with the DVD where they appear
Bottom Line: The last time I reviewed this site I scored it fairly high and I saw it as more of a network with a collection of sites. Now, three years later, Iím rethinking both of those positions. Iíve scored it lower because it now does more wrong than right, and when a Ďnetworkí also offers one main site where all their material is available I now view those niche Ďsitesí as being more like tags for sorting.

I really donít recall what the site looked like or how it was laid out three years ago when I was last a member but it now comes across as wanting to be a competitor to Videobox. If thatís true it misses the mark by a wide margin. MA has many of the weaknesses of VB without having any of its strengths.

The site currently has 7,475 DVDs uploaded. They also show 39,745 scenes as being available. For a DVD-based site they have a serious flaw in that if you open a scene it isnít linked in any way to the DVD where itís from and there is no information the DVD either. It appears that all the scenes are on DVDs but I canít say that for certain. I wouldnít join on the expectation that youíll get access to the DVDs AND get access to a lot of scenes too. I donít think the site works that way though it isn't obvious. (I also have to admit that while it appears that all the scenes offered in the niche sites are taken from DVDs on the main site I canít be certain that they all are. The way all the sites are structured makes that determination impossible. The effect may be that the site looks much larger than it really is.)

While the numbers of DVDs (and/or scenes) is impressive they only have 140 DVDs in HD. Where no HD is offered there are four resolutions of MPEG4 files available and listed as bitrates: 2000, 750, 500 and Ďportable.í For the few HD scenes here those are offered as 1080 and 720 (1920x1080 6000kb/s and 1080x720 4000kb/s, respectively). The highest bitrate scenes in SD come in at 640x480 and 2000kb/s. To be fair MA has access to a lot of older porn from the 1990s and 2000s (which I see as a great asset for the site) so I canít expect a lot better, but when VB uploads two HD DVDs per day MA looks to be lacking. Donít join here expecting a lot of quality because you wonít find it. (Of the scenes 39,745 only 2020 are in HD.)

Updates are another area where MA is lacking. But with the way the site doesnít link scene selections with the DVDs theyíre from it can be a little hard to tell. If sorting by DVD it appears that a DVD hasnít been added in almost three months but when sorting by scene the update schedule is better. There doesnít appear to be a regular update schedule but it appears that at least one scene is added per week and in some cases two scenes may be added per week. When you contrast that with VBís upload of five DVDs per day MA comes up short.

One weakness that this site and VB share is an over-reliance on compilations. Itís less acute here at MA but it is still obvious.

MA has a broad tag system for selecting scenes with approximately 115 niches tagged.

The site supports download managers and I had no problem with links timing out, though with the file sizes being so small that shouldnít be an issue anyway. I also found no download limits were imposed.

One advantage that MA has over its competition is that they offer porn in a lot of niches that aren't widely available on other similar sites. For example, they offer a lot of black-themed titles. Not interracial, but actually black-themed. Also, there is what I would call Ďsenior porn.í Not old men fucking young women or vice versa, but actually titles where all the talent is older. Finally, the site offers some gay material too, which seems odd on a straight-oriented site.

The bottom line is that Iíd only recommend this site to get access to some specific titles or studios that aren't offered elsewhere. Other than that this site comes up short in more ways than it succeeds. While it offers a low price through TBP/PU that low price isn't enough to offset the low resolutions for most of the videos. If youíre looking for an all-you-can-eat-buffet approach to porn youíre better off joining Videobox. VB is a much better value for your porn dollars.

12-13-14  01:20pm

Replies (0)
Review
24
Visit Melissa Pass

Melissa Pass
(1)

60.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Five sites of four good-looking amateurs
- Supports download managers
- Bills through CC Bill
Cons: - Site is dated
- Videos low resolution
- Most videos are broken into parts even though theyíre very small
- Photos not available in zips
- Undated uploads but doesnít appear to be updating
Bottom Line: I joined this small network based on the tour pages and the sample videos that I was able to download and watch. The problem with this approach is that I figured that the size and resolution of the videos were low and small precisely because they were previews. After joining the site I learned that the quality in the memberís pages was no better.

I joined primarily because the sites in the network seemed to have a public nudity theme and thatís a niche Iím interested in. For fans of that genre there is a fair bit here but the networkís shortcomings likely outweigh any advantages. To be fair, this is some decent public nudity. Where it loses marks in my measure is that they trade off brazenness for heat. Val, for example, makes a lot out of her arrest and 30 days in jail for public nudity and then flaunts that by wearing pasties and panties that match her skin tone to attract more police attention. There isn't a lot of sexual heat in those shoots.

There is some girl/girl and very little boy/girl (oral only) so donít join expecting to see these models in hardcore action.

The network has five sites but one of them is a cam site and I didnít check it out. Iím not really into those and I donít want to risk additional charges for something I donít want. So this review is of the four solo girl sites on the network. The four models are all young, petite and attractive. They all have a wholesome look popular in many amateur models. The girls and their sites are:

ē Val Midwest Ė 45 videos and photo sets
ē Melissa Midwest Ė 40 videos and 96 photo sets
ē Foxy Jacky Ė 20 videos and 76 photo sets
ē Sweet Adri Ė 12 videos and 79 photo sets

The site has some fairly serious flaws for both video and photo collectors. For video collectors the biggest drawbacks will be the low resolutions used and the fact that even short videos tend to be broken into parts. The highest resolutions I saw were 720x480 which are marginal at best. But when you consider that some of these videos have bitrates below 1000kb/s those are well below current standards. The best of the videos arenít that good and the worst are badly pixilated. Some of the videos are 640x480.

I canít give you photo guys much information here. I donít normally collect photos but I certainly donít if I have to download them one at a time. Yes, this site doesnít offer zipped photosets.

You may be thinking that the reason for these problems is that these videos and pictures were made many years ago. Thatís a fair question but since one model has videos and photos of her 2013 appearance in Hustler magazine it seems that the site does have newer content. Much of the material here could be older though based on a comment that exotics4me made in 2013 about having been a member there Ďyears ago.í

I canít provide any clear answer on whether any of the sites updates or not as they donít date any of the uploads. Iíve been a member less than a week and my plan is to cancel my membership today and not bother going back. Even if there were new uploads the resolutions are so low as to not have me too interested in getting them. The good news about cancelling is that the site bills through CC Bill so that wonít be a problem. My educated guess, however, is that none of the sites are updating on any regular schedule.

The site supports download managers but the file sizes are so small that they arenít really needed.

I canít say if this will be an issue with other users and Iíll be cancelling my membership and have no reason to go back, but while it is true that you get access to 5 sites with your network membership you must sign in through the site you joined through. Once in that site you have access to all the sites. What I donít know is if the content on the additional sites is limited in any way. I have no way to check that.

If you do choose to join youíll note that they offer a three-month membership. My advice is to avoid that. I downloaded 90% of the videos from the four girlís sites in less than an hour.

The bottom line is that unless you must have photos and videos from these specific models youíre best to spend your porn dollars elsewhere. The monthly fee is $30 and thatís very high for what you get. The models are hot, and there is definitely some interesting stuff for fans of public nudity, but the videos are too low resolution to have any real collectable value. And if you need the photos be prepared for a lot of clicking on your mouse. My advice is that if youíre interested you should consider this carefully: itís a lot of money for some not-very-good porn.

12-08-14  03:38pm

Replies (0)
Review
25
Visit Happy Naked Teen Girls

Happy Naked Teen Girls
(1)

83.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Beautiful models
- Solo, lesbian
- Great site for people both video and photo collectors
- Photos are zipped
- Videos and photos are excellent quality
- Options for videos and photos
- Supports download managers
Cons: - Not sure if the site is updating
- Some photo sets are zipped into multiple files
- Often a wide size difference between HD and mid-level videos
- Music can be obtrusive in videos
Bottom Line: I donít normally subscribe to soft sites like this but with a chance to expand my collection of Maryjane Johnson and Claire material I couldnít pass up the opportunity. It should be obvious with the word ĎTeení in the title that the site features beautiful and youthful models. Most of them are quite petite and there arenít many tattoos and there are no fake breasts. If you like petite and natural teen models you should consider taking a look at this site.

The site is quite soft with the scenes being solo and girl/girl. There is some toy play and some scenes are shot outdoors. I donít normally collect a lot of solo and girl/girl stuff and I found that a lot of the girl/girl stuff was even softer than Iím used to. It seems that a lot of these models might be just Ďgay for payí as there wasnít a lot of interaction. I have to confess that this increased the heat for me though.

One advantage this site has is that it really offers good value for both video and photo collectors. The site doesnít trade off one for the other as is usually the case for sites. Iím not normally a photo collector but with the beautiful models and the high quality photos I downloaded a lot.

There are currently 121 videos ranging from 5 to 40 minutes long. Videos are offered in 3 choices Ė HD, mid-range and Ďportable device.í Iíd normally download the HD but there was often a wide chasm in size between HD and medium. There are some HD files here that top out at over 10GB. Thatís too much hard drive space for something that is only a peripheral interest so in some cases I opted for the mid-range.

The HD files are 1920x1080 with bitrates from 8,000 to 25,000. They look great Ė crisp and sharp. The mid-range files are 1228x690 3000kb/s. They look good too so theyíre worth the reduced file size.

One (possibly subjective) flaw in the videos is that the music dubbed in can be loud enough to be obtrusive. Especially with a g/g scene the sounds the models make are often drowned out by the music.

There are 210 photo sets available with 70 to 400+ pics per set. The sets are zipped, though in some cases there are multiple zips. In one case there were 9 zipped files that had to be downloaded to get the full set. The photos are 5616x3744 and look good. There is a lower resolution available though I didnít download those. This may be nitpicking, but in sets requiring multiple downloads I encountered a few cases where the same file name was used twice. This is definitely nitpicking, but I found some sets to be out of sequence. A model may be reclining on a bed with panties on, followed by several with the panties off, followed by the panties on, followed by the panties being removed. Yes, Iím a bit anal that wayÖ

Thereís one important question that I canít answer: since the updates arenít dated I canít say if the site is updating or not. If I figure that out Iíll update that information.

There is no search function but one really isn't needed. There are tabs for sorting between videos and photos and there is a tab to sort by model.

The site supports download managers and I had no issues in queuing up downloads.

This was probably a one-time membership for me. I joined specifically to get video and photos for two models and one of those has left the industry so there is no hope of getting more of her. The site is quite good and the videos and photos they have are very high quality. If you like this type of model in solo and soft lesbian scenes then itís certainly worth looking at this site as a possible membership. I wouldnít hesitate to recommend it but I likely wonít be back.

11-30-14  07:34am

Replies (4)

Shown : 1-25 of 195 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.38 seconds.