Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : nickisthename (3)  

Feedback:   All (3)  |   Reviews (2)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (1)

Other:   Replies Received (1)  |   Trust Ratings (4)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-2 of 2  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit VideoBox

VideoBox
(7)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: A massive amount of hardcore scenes featuring actresses (and directors/studios) from the well known to the unknown. As of this writing there are almost 70,000 scenes available for download. New videos are added regularly.

Downloading is very easy, and you can select different file sizes/types for your convenience.

The videos are almost always of a higher quality than those found at the various tube sites.

Finding videos of a certain niche (amateur, anal, etc) is fairly easy.

The staff tends to listen to customer feedback about the website, although change can be slow.

Very low cost considering the large amount of usually high quality content.
Cons: The content is non-exclusive.

The porn itself is of varying quality. Some is quite good, some isn't. Most of it is pretty typical porn style production (lovers of more artistic porn should probably look elsewhere).
Bottom Line: Although the content isn't exclusive, I've not seen it in a single place at such a high quality for such a low price. Videobox.com is overall an excellent website for someone who wants access to high quality, professionally produced adult video downloads at a relatively low price.

02-10-12  02:40am

Replies (2)
Review
2
Visit The GF Network

The GF Network
(0)

59.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Has a gigantic selection of videos and photos featuring ostensibly amateur participants. Most of the women appear to be college aged "girl next door" types, but there are a few older women and a fair number of women with less typical styles/body types.

The GF Network also includes access to a guys only site, if that's your thing.
Cons: Much of this amateur content appears to have been grabbed from other sources, slapped with a watermark, and uploaded onto the GF Network's servers.

The quality of the photos vastly outweighs the quality of the videos. If you're looking for video quality above that found at the average tube site, look elsewhere.

The search feature doesn't allow the user to define length of video, which means manually wading through tons of videos shorter (often much shorter) than 5 minutes to find a longer one.
Bottom Line: Considering the low quality of the videos, and the non-exclusivity of the content overall, the product doesn't justify the cost of admission. I don't recommend this website.

02-10-12  01:55am

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-2 of 2  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.86 seconds.