Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : xexbot (36)  

Feedback:   All (80)  |   Reviews (27)  |   Comments (4)  |   Replies (49)

Other:   Replies Received (61)  |   Trust Ratings (24)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 27 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit The Classic Porn

The Classic Porn
(2)

70.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Very cheap monthly fees.
- Tons of classic porn.
- Well known movies, they are generally films with big name stars.
- Have some films grouped by company or regions (French porn form the 1970s for example)
- Can search catalog by year.
- Fairly well managed database of stars, directors, year the film was made, and company that made them. It could be a little better, but this is probably the one thing they do right at this site.
- You also get access to a lot of Gay movies, all classics. Some really great porn mustaches.
Cons: - One of the worst site designs. Very clunky.
- They decided to put their Facebook and Google+ links right above the download links, so you are constantly have to close popups because they are activate by "mouse overs" whenever you try to click on the download links. This is probably the most annoying thing at their site.
- Half their movies are clipped into smaller files, the other half are just whole downloads. There is no consistency to this either, well except that if they clipped it everything just gets named ipod3g_##, so you constantly have to rename every clip you download (or end up with ipod3g_01 through ipod3g_100).
- They advertise films that are supposedly going to be offered soon, but often they never do (they get skipped over, can't be offered after all; I really don't know why).
- Quality is really hit or miss here. The year of the film doesn't really seem to affect this. Old and newer films are often very poor quality.
- No choice of downloads.
Bottom Line: This is a great site if you are looking for a cheap alternative to buying classic porn DVDs or more likely VHS in a lot of these cases. They have a ton of films here, but you may not always find the biggest ones here (or anywhere else for that matter). For example, they have a ton of Christy Canyon's movies, but only one Traci Lords. However, the quality of many of these movies is sub-par just from their origins in time, but at the same time the operators of this website really need to establish some degree of consistency. Occasionally they will post a movie that is almost unwatchable. One of the most annoying things, aside from their poor placement of Facebook links, are how badly they can mess a movie up clipping it. Having to rename half your downloads from this site is something I haven't had to deal with since the 1990s. They took the time to clip it, you are paying them to do so whether you wanted them to or not, the least they could do is title their videos properly. This little faux pas just makes them look as amateurish as their 1960s movies (of which there are only a handful). It is clear that they are just uploading films with no regard towards their customer's satisfaction.

My problem with this site is that after some time (1-2 months)you have probably downloaded everything you want to keep. So, you are enticed into staying because they have a movie you have been searching for "coming soon." Hopefully they actually offer it, but oftentimes the film just disappears out of the "coming soon" list. Then you add to it all the little annoyances like having to close the popups when you accidentally mouse over them, renaming your downloads, and all of this so that maybe you can get a movie or two that you actually want per week. After a few months I found myself going for days and days without downloading from this site. It really ticks you off when the download links don't work for the first few days they offer the movie too, which has happened about every third movie they upload it seems.

The bottom line is that if you are looking for a site with a ton of classic porn, then this is probably the only one worth trying. I recommend it as a one time, one month membership. Get in there and get what you want and get out. They don't seem to care about the problems with their site (post suggestions all you want via their "suggestion box," I am pretty sure nobody reads them). The quality is hit or miss, and you won't really know until you download it. And like many sites these days, if you are using a Download manager you will have about thirty minutes before you will have to refresh the links. Fortunately their largest file sizes are still less than 500mb, so this is only a problem if you are trying to download half a decade worth of movies at a time. They are a good source for classic porn, but until they start addressing some of these issues I wouldn't recommend any long term memberships with them. The only reason they score a 70 is because they do have an impressive catalog, but that is about all they have going for them. What is sad is that their most impressive aspect has nothing to do with the site itself, just the access it provides to all those movies. There biggest problems are horrible mistakes made by web designers and management. As soon as any other company comes along offering this niche, this site will get trounced into oblivion. I have personally emailed Videobox requesting that they at least create an additional, retro site. I would rather pay Videobox and extra $15/mo than to keep paying these guys.

11-12-12  09:36am

Replies (11)
Review
2
Visit Rodney Moore

Rodney Moore
(1)

82.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Hairy Hippie Girls are kind of the selling point here. Lots of natural, often unshaven, women with long hair, tie-dyed dresses.

There is a certain campy, B-movie quality to everything they do. In a away this separates them from mainstream porn, and I found that appealing.

Some incredible amateur models from the Northwest US region. If you are really into the Seattle/Portland scenes, this is probably one of the best samplings of the region. Something about this type of porn just screams "indie-alt-porn."

Major focus on the women. Most of the time this is a result of the POV style of most of Rodney's work.

You'll be surprised how many famous names show up in his videos.

The lesbian videos here, which comprise maybe 20-35% of the stock, are some of the most realistic you will ever see and on par with what you find at sites like We Are Hairy and Abby Winters, not necessarily softcore, but definitely devoid of any testosteronal influences(just one dildo instead of a whole toolbox).
Cons: Since they don't always wear bras, gravity is a lot harsher on some of the models than others. It can be a little disconcerting seeing the boobs of a fifty year old woman on a twenty year old.

A lot of the models are real hippie chicks with the hygiene and grooming practices that are stereotypical of hippies. With all that hair, sometimes you can actually smell the girls through your computer monitor. Seems like maybe 1 out of every 6 or 7 is just a little too "hippie" for my tastes.

The B-movie quality I mentioned is great sometimes, but other times it is that quality because Rodney Moore doesn't know the first thing about lighting a scene. About half of all the videos will either be too dark and grainy, or so brightly lit it starts to wash out all the details, bushes get all pixelated, etc. So expect about 50% of the movies to be low-quality.

POV style only works if a) you can hold the camera steady and b) you have the light to do so. Rodney often only has one of these.
Bottom Line: Yes, the video quality sucks, and there is no consistency in terms of the the formats or camerawork. Rodney Moore has ruined many shoots with what was an otherwise super hot chick that just couldn't be seen because he likes to shoot in rooms with natural light. This means every time he shoots something on one side of the room that is brightly lit, the other half of the room looks like it is shrouded in shadow. This throws off his white balance and causes a lot of wash. The reason I keep mentioning this is because on an old CRT monitor this wasn't that noticeable. On a nice new HD LED monitor, this can look like shit. Yeah, I said it.

So why even consider it? Well, probably for the same reason you still like to look up the girls from the 1970s on the PLAYBOY site. It's partly nostalgic for some of us who chased those hairy hippie girls all through college. And some of us get tired of seeing the ultra-professional, ultra-glammed-up porn. And maybe, as a US citizen, I would like to know that we have our own Abby Winters-esque models here in the states. Then there is just the overall feel of this site. Much like Suicide Girls, this site just screams "Pacific Northwest." For those of you who don't know, this area of the US is sort of a Mecca for the indie/alt music scene (the locals get a little miffed about this, but they are always associated with "grunge").

Yes, there are probably more cons than pros with this site. But the pros make up for it, I think. The fact of the matter is that if you are into chicks like these, vid quality is not going to be as big an issue to you. Some of these videos are probably over ten years old at this point and this borders on a retro site. As such it is a lot like getting a membership to a classic porn site. You can't fault the standards of the time for the current video quality, you just have to accept it.

Who should join this site? If you are into hairy, hirsute women, then you want to check this out for at least a month. If you are into amateurs, and particularly younger girls in their early twenties, then you want to check this out. If you like POV, and all of the above, then you want to check this out. And, if you like the smell of patchouli mixed with the aromatic flavors of a wet bush, then you will want to check this site out (you won't really smell it, but you will think you do, so what's the diff).

Will you stay member here indefinitely? probably not. A month or two will suffice for most. The updates aren't necessarily updates, just re-posting of older stuff most of the time. I don't think there is any actual new content coming from him, but I may be wrong. This is more or less an archive site. What's really scary is just how many videos there are in this archive, and how many Rodney himself was in. The guy has got to be rivaling the likes of Ron Jeremy, and he did it in about a third of the time.

08-08-12  11:27am

Replies (2)
Review
3
Visit 21 Sextreme

21 Sextreme
(1)

89.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Same people as 21 Sextury.com, so you can expect the same level or quality of porn as you would from them (see my other 21 Sextury review for more details about vid quality, etc.)

Very nice navigation. You can look at the front pages of the individual sites, then search within them, or you can just go look up a master list of "categories" and it will pull vids from all the sites. Lot's of tags you can search by as well. For those of you with VideoBox memberships, 21 Sextury/Sextreme's tagging system blows theirs away.

Vids come in several mp4 and wmv formats ranging in quality. Warning, all high quality and better vids are usually over 1gb here.

Streaming is good quality and pretty reliable. No chop, no stuttering, buffering, etc.

Very fast download speeds. I clocked about 2.25 mb/s on average. I use a DLM so this may affect that to some extent. They are DLM friendly, though, like most sites now only if you get the vids within an hour or so.
Cons: The name 21 Sextreme is misleading. Yes, it is supposed to be the more extreme, fetish niche stuff, but it's not really that extreme or edgy. For me, old people having sex with young people is not that extreme. Just because it is a fetish doesn't mean it's an extreme fetish.

14 Sextreme sites vs. 20 Sextury for the same price?

Some of the Sextreme sites subjects get covered by Sextury sites already (fisting and lesbian stuff in particular.)
Bottom Line: They offer a package deal to get both 21 Sextury and Sextreme together for like $45. But you can join each site individually from here for like $20 each, so do it that way if you think you want both.

I like Sextreme for Dominated Girls, Home Porn Reality (one of the better sites imo), Mighty Mistresses, and yes, even Tight Gay Holes. I'm one of those bi-curious guys who could become a raging queen for some of the guys on that site. Zoliboy, for those of you who don't know, is a little like MILF Hunter or Bang Bus with a lot of pissing. There are also three decent tranny sites if you're into that.

I don't know if I mentioned this in the previous review of 21 Sextury, but he bonus sites are basically just that, Bonus. You'll get a smattering of decent vids from these, but they are not full blown or necessarily extensive websites. It tends to be a lot of the stuff you get from either of the main sites, just geared towards a specific race or body type. Intermixed Sluts is a pretty cool site, so as an added bonus that's pretty cool.

The big question is do you join this as well, or just 21 Sextury by itself? Honestly, I think this is a good site, but I think I would feel it lacking if I didn't also have the membership to 21 Sextury. IMO, this is soemthing you would want in addition to 21 Sextury, not in place of it. There are far better "extreme" sites out there if that is solely what you are looking for.

I scored this an 89 because I do believe that overall the site is that good. Just because it didn't fully satisfy my tastes doesn't mean it won't fully satisfy yours. One plus is that this does give you a well rounded selection of fetishes, in particular gay material. Most sites separate the gay male vids into a whole other site you have to pay for. So if you like a little variety in regards to that, there's another selling point.

07-30-12  12:20pm

Replies (0)
Review
4
Visit Indie Porn Revolution

Indie Porn Revolution
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Used to be NoFauxxx.com, so you can expect to find "No Fake" porn here, and it's true. These are real, ordinary, and often very average (in terms of appearance) people. So, for a semi-amateur site you can count on this to be truly amateur type vids and pics. It's no the mail-in-your-ex-girlfriend-video type of stuff so that's why I say semi-am.

Expect production values that are decent, but not high quality. This adds to the authenticity of the am quality.

The real selling point, imo, is that these are real people, real lesbians in particular with all their butchness or femininity. To be honest, it is really hard to tell the boys from the girls until they start going down on each other here. There are both female and male transsexuals (people who have been surgically altered). This is a rare opportunity to see a transsexual male (female to male) in porn. James Darling is every bit male until you see him getting fisted in his vagina.

Most of them seem to have a wicked sense of humor
Cons: It's semi-am, so it's semi-am quality most of the time. In well lit rooms everything is fine. But they also feature some videos of some sort of live show they do, and though they appear okay, it is a single camera trying to cover a live stage show.

This may not necessarily be a con, but the BBWs tend to pop up in a lot of the videos. If you have an aversion to fat rolls, you may not like all of the vids here.

Navigation is abysmal. Very few ways to navigate. Basically just pages with all their clips. Fortunately you can look at the models or "Foxes" and see what they have available that way.

Can't download pics in zips.

To download the videos, as far as I can see, you have to go into a member's viewing page, and there is still no download link. My DLM picks up on the link and lets me download, but I don't know about other DLMs or right-click options.

Very finite number of videos and photo sets.
Bottom Line: Apparently they are in the process of transitioning from NoFauxx to Indie Porn Rev. So, as more professional reviewers have pointed out, some of the cons may be as a result of this.

What really sold me on this site was first, the new name. How can you not want to be part of a porn revolution. Their mission statement (yes, they actually post their mission statement, how awesome is that) says they are a "queer" site that includes everything, including straight sex. You will even get a brief lesson on how to address trans and queer-gendered (sir, ma'am, etc.) They have clearly tried to carve out a small area for people who do not fit the typical cookie-cutter molds for porn stars, as well as for people who do not fit easily into gender and sex categories. So, for that alone it's worth looking into.

The problem lies in their lack of material. I hate to say this about a site I have so much respect for, but it's probably better just to do the 5 day membership, because I am not sure they have enough material to keep you busy beyond a few days. I certainly cannot imagine remaining a member of this site for more than 1 month.

All in all I love the idea of this site, I think maybe more than I actually love the site itself. You will get some really good, true-life sex, but most of you will see the entire site within a few days I would suspect. Real lesbian porn is a growing niche and soemthing I particularly like to see, so I hope this site continues to grow over time.

07-30-12  11:50am

Replies (0)
Review
5
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(10)

92.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: One thing 21 Sextury has become known for is high quality models. The skankiest girl on their sites will still be ten times hotter than the best looking girls on other sites. They also seem to attract a variety of body styles and types. They even have a tag for "super tiny tits" and "jumbo tits" so you can see a wide variety of boobs, butts and bent-over babes.

The navigation is actually one of the best I have seen. This has got to be one of the better cross-listed sites. You get exactly what you expect, and a lil more. Pull up a model and you can see all her scenes (though you will only have access to whatever you have paid for, ie 21 Sextury vs. 21 Sextreme). They use really good profile photos of the models. I know that sounds weird to mention, but you can tell from the profile pic is she is the body type you are looking for, not just the face.

The porn covers a variety of niches, though more mainstream stuff does seem to be their overall focus. Lots of DP and anal.
Cons: The girls can be a little glammed up for my tastes. This is higher quality, mainstream stuff, so I can expect this.

Models tend to only work for one or two sites within the network, so occasionally you will find a model you really like, but may be disappointed by the fact that she only appears on a solo site, etc.

Not sure if this was a pro or con, but many of the models, despite their hotness, are relatively unknown, at least to me. You're not going to find a lot of Sasha Grays or Bobbi Starrs here.

The page that opens whenever you click on the scene you want takes you to a second navigation page that has five or six tabs. It would have been nice if they took you straight to the download page first.

Files size of their vids are huge. A medium quality vid at their site come sin at around 600mbs.
Bottom Line: Overall I would have to say if you are looking for a good, well rounded site to join, 21 Sextury is something you should look at. Realistically you should consider joining both 21 Sextury and 21 Sextreme together to get the full benefits (it was cheaper for me to take advantage of 2 reduced priced memberships from here than one package membership from them).

Download speeds are some of the fastest I have found. I max out at around 3.2mb/s and most the time I am downloading from them at about 2.8mb/s. It allows for multiple downloads, but DLMs will experience the usual timeout if it doesn't grab them within an hour or so.

My only issue with this site is their video quality, which is actually so good it is becoming an issue in terms of how much space the vids take up now. On average their HD vids (wmv and mp4) are over 1gb. While streaming these makes for some really high quality, it may also cause problems for slower bandwidths. I personally download more than I stream, so this has been somewhat of an issue for me. However, I would also point out that 21 Sextury is ahead of the curve, and most HD vids are going to start getting up around these sizes everywhere. Still, it would be nice to see if they couldn't come up with a compressed version for download. That being said, I have to commend them for their clipping ability. They usually try to provide the vids in about eight to ten clips, with the option to download the whole video. So, you don't necessarily have to go after the whole thing, as some of these are over forty five min scenes.

For the twenty bucks it will cost you for linking from here, 21 Sextury offers a wide variety of very high quality porn for a reasonable price. It may not become your favorite, but I guarantee you will find at least one or two sites within their network that will give you twenty bucks worth of fun.

07-29-12  10:32am

Replies (5)
Review
6
Visit Divine Bitches

Divine Bitches
(2)

94.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This is part of the Kink.com network of sites, so you can generally expect pretty high quality from them. Their videos range (depending on ho wold they are) in size and quality, but most are HD videos, or near that quality for some of the oldest stuff. Most everything I downloaded was around 300mb or higher mark, 640x360 mp4s. You have a choice between low, med, and high quality video downloads. Streaming is pretty solid here as well. Even when I have several video pages opening up the streams all come in pretty quick (faster than videobox).

Probably the biggest selling point is the star power. People like Bobbi and Aiden Starr are the standard at Kink.com. I am always amazed at the range of talent these women have. Very talented, very attractive stars in all their videos. There really isn't such a thing as a "bad" video at their site.

When I joined they were offering two for one specials and I also got a membership at meninpain.com.
Cons: The search within the Divine Bitches website works fine, but if you click on a star's name to see everything he/she has done it takes you to a listing of all of their kink.com work. If you click on a video from this page even for something they shot for Divine Bitches, it takes you a pay-per-view page rather than the actual Divine Bitches site. So that's a little annoying. You can still type Aiden Starr into the search in Divine Bitches and pull up her DB videos only and download them.

Kink.com likes to link to their other sites a lot. There no real chance of actually ordering something by accident in the pay-per-view, but they really do like to hype their other sites. It was a little alarming to me the first time I joined a kink.com site and it made me a little paranoid that I might accidentally join another site. This is not the case, I assure you.

They throw a lot at you on the start page. It can be a little overwhelming at times.
Bottom Line: Kink.com is a group you can usually trust, and also a group that seems to be setting the standards for fetish videos such as these (BDSM, femdom, latex, etc.). I scored Divine Bitches a 94 because a) there is always room for improvement and b) they could do soemthing to make navigation a little easier, mainly indexing the videos by star within the individual site, rather than all of kink.com. If they did that I could easily see myself giving this site a 98 (I can't ever see a site going much higher than that).

As far as recommendation goes, I have been a member in other kink.com sites and I can say they all seem to be pretty good. This site was one I hadn't really looked at before, and frankly I think it is one of their better sites. You get a nice range of femdom BDSM here that covers a variety of subjects (cuckolding, BDSM,ball torture, teasing, masturbation instruction, so on and so forth), whereas some of their other sites are more specific or focused in terms of the niche. I think if you are interested in any of the kink.com sites and don't know which one to try, this might be the safest bet.

06-25-12  11:08am

Replies (2)
Review
7
Visit Cuckold Me Now

Cuckold Me Now
(0)

50.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: I rarely can't find anything positive to say about a site, but this site was really so bad it doesn't have any pros
Cons: Video quality is not quality at all. The average wmv file size at this site is around 20mb or less with many falling around 6mb. Even a large file I downloaded (83mb) was still in a 720x480 frame, was not HD, and it still looked like the picture was getting stretched when you maximized the video window. The smaller files are clearly designed for an old school site and to be played in a very small window (320x240).

The design of the site really looks outdated. I have talked in the past about sites that hearken back to the nineties. In this case, if I didn't know better, I would say the site was designed somewhere around 1979. It actually reminds me of an old Adam and Eve catalog from the 1970s. Basically a page which a bunch of thumbnails, no titles or descriptions for videos, and you don't even get any clue as to the size and quality until you open the page that has the video on it.

Absolutely no search capability or indexing whatsoever.

I have run out of room to keep complaining
Bottom Line: This site is probably the biggest ripoff I have ever personally encountered. I went for it basically because they also included a membership to Romanvideoarchives.com. That turned out be an even worse selling point.

Basically I think a lot of these videos actually do date back to the late seventies or eighties. At least they look like they do. The quality is sub-par, even by 1970s standards. There are times when you can tell they just put the camera there, hit record, and that's the only shot your going to see the whole time, even when the actors move out of frame. It really is pretty bad quality just at the most basic, point-and-shoot level.

This site doesn't seem to be updating, though they claim they are. If they are they are only updating with old videos from the archive, because I have yet to see anything that looks like it was even shot within the last five years. Even webcams have better video quality now than what they were using.

The bottom line here is that if you waste a single cent on this site you're getting burned. I am trying to post this ASAP in the hopes I can prevent some of you from making the same mistake I did. If you are looking for cuckold videos there are far better sites like Cuckoldcream that will cost you about the same amount. They have clearly designed this site for low bandwith users, and file size (and quality) designed for streaming or downloading through a 56k modem (remember those days). I guess if you're feeling nostalgic for a five or ten min video that has been broken down into 2min videos meant to be played in about a four inch window, then this is the site for you. Otherwise, I would avoid this site like the plague.

P.S. Don't let the "tour" or "start page" windows fool you. The page shown above (or for this site here) is not the actual "members" page. Once you click "members" it takes you to the page from the 1970s.

06-25-12  10:33am

Replies (4)
Review
8
Visit Ryanne Redd

Ryanne Redd
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Let me preface this all by saying I am an absolute fan of RyAnne Redd. Arguably, why else would you join her site. So, let me give you the break down.

RyAnne is a super-hot redhead with a full bush of red pubes. She really is very unique in terms of her appearance and her particular niche. For those of you unfamiliar with her, she is a popular, and somewhat of a rare commodity, in the "hairy/hirsute" niche. She also has about the most perfect pair of breasts I have ever seen. So much so I called them "Breasts" and not "titties" or "ta-tas" like I normally would.

She is trying to fill a variety of fetishes. She does some jerkoff instruction, some cuckolding, and various other stuff. In a way it is similar to what some women like Mistress T are doing.

Video wuality is pretty good. You get a choice between HD flv, mp4, and "Ipod."
Cons: Strictly solo material so far. I have seen her in at least one POV blowjob video in the past, but there is nothing but solo material on the site and it would be nice to see her actually fuck someone else or whatever. She's hot, but there are only so many solo videos you can get away with before it starts to just me "lingerie of the week."

Low amount of video content. I'm not going to give you an actual count because this is a new site and it's not fair to her to condemn the site for not having a ton of material yet. That being said, though, it is a shame she couldn't at least get some of her previous videos on her new site.
Bottom Line: At the moment I have to say the jury is still out on this one. I gave the score of 85 simply because there are thing that make me think this site may be a lot bigger soon. They have links/buttons already in place to scroll through pages of videos and seem to be designing the site basically as you would expect any other soloists site to be. Can it be improved, sure. Better search capability, greater diversity in material, etc. The usual stuff.

The selling point here is that it is RyAnne Redd, and if you are a fan, you are probably an obsessed fan. It's worth a month's subscription just to snag those few extra videos of her.

I have an issue in that I am a huge fan, so I want to just shower her with accolades, but I also think that as a customer other people might want to know what they are paying for. If people don't subscribe, then the site will most likely fail. But telling people to subscribe to a site that has very little to offer right out of the gate isn't really fair to them. If you're a fan, a month's membership is a good way to show your appreciation and encourage her to do more, and I'll leave it at that.

06-21-12  11:11am

Replies (5)
Review
9
Visit Fetish Network

Fetish Network
(0)

79.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: It's hard to come up with pros for this site. Is it a "pro" if they are simply performing the most basic duties of a website?

The site is stable. I have never had much trouble logging in or connecting to pages.

I have never found a dead link.

I find their font sizes to be legible without my glasses.

The appearance and layout is functional.

Yes, this is sarcasm, but I am really having a hard time finding a lot to put in this category for them. Here's some stuff about their videos.

You get a choice between "High" and "Low" quality mp4s, or you can stream. The high res stuff isn't bad. Some of it is even HD, but not much.

They do have a pretty impressive selection of categories: BDSM, spanking, femdom, smothering, fisting, smoking, nylon/lingerie, jerkoff instruction, lesbian, and mixed kink (see cons about this).
Cons: The one thing that annoys me the most is that there is no cross-listing or networking taking place here, and it is literally called the "Fetish Network." You have no real search capability, and if you do happen to find someone you think was really hot in something, there is no way to either find out who they are, or to easily find other videos with them on the site. In fact, the entire interface is definitely a 1990s design. Basically each "Site" under their network opens into a index of thumbnails for videos. The titles are fairly descriptive, but there is no way of knowing what will actually take place in the video. Arguably, this can make the videos more fun or exciting, but in dealing with subject matters such as this (BDSM generally) you kind of want to know what you're in for.

Aside from that, there is a distinct lack of variety. For as many videos as they have, they all just seem to be the same dozen or so, fat, middle-aged men, or whoever, doing the same stuff to girls.
Bottom Line: This is a site that could be awesome for you if you are really into seeing all sorts of women get spanked, caned, whipped, or titty twisted. That seems to be about 75% of the material. The models are a mixed bag of nuts, some are pretty and young, others are amateurish and/or fugly. The girls doing the jerkoff instruction are all pretty hot, and jerkoff instruction isn't exactly a really prevalent niche, so I thought it was going to be awesome having so many of these videos. Instead, they are all pretty lame, a few of the girls actually know who to do it, but most just kind of model their pantyhose and don't talk that much. So, you can see where something like this may be very tricky. Looking at clips or a thumbnail of videos like these make it seem like they are a lot higher quality than what you get with the entire product. It's kind of like getting duped into paying $15.00 to see Prometheus.

This site doesn't offer much to anyone who isn't really, really, really into spanking, caning and whipping. Beyond that subject matter, it is very shallow. There is a lot of bondage, but you don't get to see a lot of the actual binding. The girl or guy just appears bound. The machine sex is pretty cheap stuff, and they are still really into putting dildos on the end of pool cues. Even when there are hot models involved, the production values are still very low rent.

Not all of the material is original, and stuff like the Rick Savage videos may have been around for awhile already. It is possible you have seen some of this stuff elsewhere. It is also possible that it is just so plain and generic that you think you've seen it elsewhere. They also tend to include duplicates of videos in the various sites.

I don't think a site should get any accolades for basically doing the bare minimum. Clearly someone updates the site, but no one seems to even try get organized. The videos are not enough to carry this site alone. They aren't horrible, but they aren't great either. Some customer consideration could go a long way into at least making the customer not feel as if they have just been scammed. But, unfortunately, once you shell out the money, you are immediately introduced to a site layout that screams "We got your money, what do we care?"

06-21-12  10:45am

Replies (2)
Review
10
Visit Chaturbate

Chaturbate
(1)

80.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A few months since the last review and I would say there are actually a surprising number of models/shows here.

Some of the girls are actually extremely hot. Much more so than you expect for webcam stuff like this anyway.

You can actually see quite a bit without having to private. Basically stripping is free, anything beyond that is going to cost you.

The tipping/credits are noway near as expensive as other places.

You can broadcast yourself, private chat, etc. I could see where this might potentially grow as a sort of naked social network.
Cons: I have seen at least one person on there you will never convince me was over the age of fifteen. I'm not saying this so all you kiddie porn pervs can check it out. I'm saying this because this is one of those questionable elements on the internet where there may be too many people to ever police or monitor. I don't blame Chaturbate either, somebody gets an account and then someone else is doing the shows, it can be a little tricky to catch on. At any rate, just be warned that from time to time you may see someone on there who doesn't look legal. Some of these people are in foreign countries with different laws. Either way, I find many of the people on here to be of questionable standing. I personally would hate to think I am contributing to some sort of unregulated or illegal sex trade.
Bottom Line: I think this site has a lot of potential, but it's sort of the old Spiderman cliche about responsibility. Personally, I would like to see them make a greater effort to assure me, as someone who might actually spend money, that I am not contributing to something most of us would probably find immoral.

At the same time, you should all be adults and you should be able to navigate through the various shows available to see what you think is best. I certainly don't want to dissuade anyone from visiting or participating.

06-10-12  02:36am

Replies (3)
Review
11
Visit Wank Pass

Wank Pass
(1)

65.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Fairly diverse collection of sites (see cons about this) with a few niches you don't usually get on other mass sites such as Bisex, Gay, various fetishes.
Cons: No search capability.

Video quality sucks. Hardly any HD material.

Each site in their collection is small, and even the few that have more than four pages of material are recycling some pretty common stuff.

Downloading is a pain because some of the sites are so old they still have their videos divided up into as many as twenty two 2-5mb files.

Download managers will work, but as soon as you start downloading files you can no longer continue browsing.

The interface is the worst part. You're basically looking at 1990s internet at this site. Some random screen caps and a very rough description is all you get for each file. When I say rough descriptions I'm talking about a screen cap of what might be an ass and something like "Two girls fuck a guy." No names, sometimes even no titles of the videos that I know came from specific movies. It's pretty awful.
Bottom Line: There is little good to say about this site, and frankly there's no improving it. The content may be original in some cases, but it's all pretty dated. This is basically a bargain basement porn site that should have died out with Y2K.

06-10-12  02:07am

Replies (0)
Review
12
Visit Next Door Nikki

Next Door Nikki
(0)

85.0
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: It's NDN, and at one point she was, and I would argue still is, one of the hottest women on the internet.

Tons of access to Nikki's life. Yes, I know it sounds cheesy, but just wait till you get to jack off to somebody whose blogs you have been reading for over a month.

Occasionally Nikki will go further than her usual softcore stff. It won't be triple "X" (XXX), but it does get into the single "X" region.

It's NDN. Have I mentioned this before?

Limited nudity. I personally find it incredibly sexy when I'm dying to see more.... and I don't.She's the kind of girl that makes you want to go and just pound one out fully clothed, let alone after she starts teasing.

Probably one of the most perfect bodies in creation.

You get to see some of her friends too, and they get a little more risque than Nikki. So you will get some full on masturbation, fully nude stripping on the site.

Live shows are great, and this is often where you get to see the most of Nikki. Lotsa nipple slips!
Cons: Very little beyond R-rated softcore stuff. If you want more than stripping, and never seeing her nipples, then move on.

A lot of the same stuff, just different costumes.

Her friends stuff is basically trying to get you to join their sites.

Very expensive.

Limited video qualities.

Some videos are just flat out pointless.

Download limits. They don't have enough videos to let people download them more than 5gb a day, and they're pretty big videos.
Bottom Line: It's Next Door Nikki for crying out loud. Either you have obsessed and poured over the internet looking for that one video where she actually fucks someone ore gets totally naked, or you could care less and have no idea who I am talking about.

NDN is an internet sensation primarily because she has never gone fully porn with her career. She is basically a stripper, and one who works in an area where pasties are required. Or, maybe she just likes keeping every guy hoping and dreaming. Either way, I find it very erotic and very exciting. She always brings you right to the edge of being pornographic, but then cuts you off. It can be kind of torturous, very teasing, but for some of us, that is often more stimulating than, as someone else put it here, the "gynecological closeups" of full frontals.

The problems with the site will be overlooked by most fans, because most people joining are niche fans of a specific star who is, in this case, known for being a bit of a cock-tease.

The main drawback is the price versus the amount of content. This is primarily the Phil-Flash materials, and not the entire cadre of NDN's work (there was an old site that is no longer in operation). With the download limit in place, you can still manage to download most of this site in a month.

Why an 85? Because it's NDN. She's will always be above an 80 in my book. She could get into the 90 region if she would figure out a way to feature more people who are willing to go at least XX, and at some point she is either going to have to fuck somebody on screen, or risk losing her career to age.

05-20-12  01:57pm

Replies (1)
Review
13
Visit Devils Film

Devils Film
(1)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Tons of movies, with a wide range of content. The quality of the films is better than what you will find at some sites. This is due to the fact that this is an actual porn company, not just a website. As a result you get to draw upon there entire range of films.

Subject or niche-wise, you get a little bit of everything from straight sex to some femdom. They have a lot of bisexual material, some femdom, but their overall focus seems to be fairly traditional stuff like teens, gangbangs, etc.

They allow you a choice of video quality selections. Newer stuff is HD, while older stuff isn't likely to be, or likely to be as high quality as the newer 1080p stuff. Everything is in mp4 format.

Slick website design and a fairly easy to navigate interface. Also a fairly reasonable price.
Cons: Very little search capabilities. They tag so many things, but you can't really search very effectively on this site.

It hates my download manager. They use some sort of rotating links or something, so my dlm can handle it fine for about thirty minutes or so, then I have to refresh all the links. This may not be the case for all dlms.

Download speeds vary with them. At times I have seen them slow way down to less than 500k/sec. This is only at certain times, and I suspect they are updating the site.
Bottom Line: The lack of effective search capabilities, the slowdowns, and the inconveniences with dlms make this a less than 90 site in my opinion. Which is a shame, because otherwise it is a good site. I would argue that most sites like this are primarily competing with Videobox and a few others. Devils Film has enough uniqueness to allow them to compete with Videobox, but some poor choices in website design, and relatively the same material everyone else has to offer, I think will ultimately make them a second or third choice in comparison to other similar sites like Video Box or Red light.

05-05-12  03:11pm

Replies (0)
Review
14
Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West
(1)

65.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Decent amount of content, there's plenty here to keep you busy for a long time.

Clearly amateur-ish. "Amateur" is such a subjective term, but the girls and guys here are clearly not professionals, thought hey are certainly not virgins to porn after their first shoot.

More natural women, less make-up and porn-like qualities.
Cons: Video quality is relative to whatever they shot it with. I'm not sure they aren't using Super * in some cases, the quality is that bad.

Amateur porn, you get what you expect, amateur quality.

Selection of content is all pretty much the same. Apparently Aussies aren't into exciting or passionate sex. The lesbian sex here is really just masturbation with a little kissing. Tame by reality standards.
Bottom Line: This site wants to e Abby Winters so badly they think they can just coast off that business model. Unfortunately they fail in this regard, and realistically, if their is any real talent they tend to wind up at Abby Winters anyway. Not that these are the only two Aussie sites, but they do seem to be closely linked in terms of style, content, and even models.

You're better off spending the extra money at Abby Winters. You will get about the same amount in terms of diversity, maybe a little less m/f than GOW, but the quality of GOW m/f hardcore, if you can call it that, was so lame you're better off without it.

04-20-12  05:14pm

Replies (2)
Review
15
Visit Tainster

Tainster
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Fairly massive content. There really is more here than you can download in a few months, so that is always a big plus.

The sites are all pretty self explanatory. What you get with these is about 3 different party/orgy/swinging sites, and 1 that is softcore. It's about the same for pissing and WAM. A couple of fetish sites geared towards satin and hose, and 1 really good bdsm/femdom site.

The quality of all the videos content-wise is top notch. It's mostly Russian/Ukraine, and the models are absolutely fabulous.

The video quality itself is what you expect; older videos are not going to be as good as newer. They usually give you at least three options, with some of the newer videos being 720/1080 HD, and over 1gb in size.

The free live webcam performances are pretty good too. You also get access to the photos, which are usually screen caps of the videos, but there is also a pic post section.

Download speeds are well within reason. Can pretty much max out 2.5/sec dl speed.
Cons: There is a pop-up box when you click to download a video which is always set on the lowest format, has to be changed, then has to be right-clicked to get it to save to my download manager.

There updates often consist of about 75% party videos from a different camera. They usually release them in blocks of 2-5, for three different cameras.
Bottom Line: Tainster has really made a name for themselves and I was certainly pleased when I became a member. There is way more to see here than you will ever have time for. Granted, some of it is just different camera angles of the same event, but HOLY COW those events. They deserve to get covered by three or more cameras. I like to play a fun little game called "Track the Girl" and see if you can spot the same girl in all the different cameras/angles.

For those of you looking for a well rounded fetish site go elsewhere. These sites will get you plenty of pissing,WAM, satin/secretary, some lesbo, some MF hardcore, some BDSM and femdom, but this from their one site Tyrannized (what a great name). Tyrannized does have some forced bi, cuckolding, strapon femdom, etc. And it is a damn good site.

The bottom line here is that you can join a network that is always adding content, and seldom fails to deliver good quality videos and photos.

04-19-12  11:18pm

Replies (1)
Review
16
Visit MistressT.net

MistressT.net
(0)

95.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Let's face it, Mistress T's just looks classy. Everything about her and her sight is just top notch. The site layout has an almost Victorian look to it, but Mistress T herself is a very contemporary, modern woman.

The video quality is just okay. It is clear that she is doing a homemade production here, but this in no way detracts from the quality of the content. The real selling point here are these videos. She is very good at providing accurate descriptions with tags such as forced blowjob, forced bi, cuckolding, etc. It's not too hard to navigate through these and there are search capabilities.

The videos themselves vary, which is also a major selling point. Mistress T likes to roleplay, so you get a lot of solo videos of her playing various roles, such as your step-mom or sister, telling you what to do and how to do it. Other videos include subs and cucks, and she proceeds to put them through their paces.

On top of everything else, Mistress T is pretty damn hot!
Cons: Slooooow downloads. Less than 1mb/sec, usually 800k/sec for me. You're probably going to want to use a download manager, which I have had no problems with on her sight.

You have to pay extra for unlimited downloads, otherwise you are limited. Though I don't necessarily agree with these practices, I also understand it may be an issue of limiting the load their server has to deal with. Just be aware of this when you sign up.

Could use more guest appearances. It is primarily Mistress T you are coming to see, sure, but occasionally she does pull in a transsexual or a second or third male. It would be nice to see her bring in some more women from time to time, or even dominate some women.
Bottom Line: As far as fetish cites go Mistress T is certainly raising the bar not only for solo artists like herself, but for larger production companies like Kink.com too.

There is a much more personal connection with the performers in sites like this. Within a few days you get to know MT very well, and every time she tells you to eat your own cum, you get a little closer to doing it.

Whether you are just looking for some really good kink, or perhaps you need a pseudo-dom in your life, then Mistress T's site is definitely something you want to check out. Aside from the slow download speeds, there really isn't much to complain about here.

04-18-12  11:52am

Replies (5)
Review
17
Visit Femdom Worship

Femdom Worship
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Great videos. I know that seems really subjective to say, but their videos are really top notch for the sort of low-rent production value you usually see in these types of fetish videos. Beautiful girls and the men are usually varied enough that you can find someone who suits your tastes. The action is not so all over the place like a lot of femdom videos. I like this because if I want just a strapon scene, "bam" there it is! No ff-ing through a twenty minute video to find what your looking for. Categories they focus on are: Foot Fetish, Domination, Cock Control, Facesitting and Strapon. The videos in each category are varied, some are extreme domination, some of them are girls just basically making the guys hard before they screw the hell out of them. This site is all about the quality of content rather than quantity.

This is their only real "pro," but I want to make it clear this a big pro.
Cons: Interface and site layout hearkens back to the 1990s. Not the biggest issue to me, I don't really care how the site looks. The navigation could use a major upgrade though and include some currently non-existent search capabilities.

Non-English. They do provide subtitles, but usually when you see Russian sites like this they keep the dialogue to a minimum for whatever reasons. Don't expect a lot of domination dialogue.

Video format is basic. You don't get a lot of choice in formats here. The real annoying thing is that you can download clips, but if you try to download the whole, joined file it is called "fulllength" every time. So you have to either rename the file or you end up fulllength_01 through 50.

Limited amount of videos. Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of videos here, but if you are a major pornophile who downloads a lot (3-5 movies per site per day), like me, then you may find the well running dry after a month.
Bottom Line: It's ugly, clunky, and outdated website would initially make most people run these days. Frankly, I look at this as a sort of "underground" scene in the porn community, and so appearances may not always be the most important aspect. When you are talking about fetish sites catering to specific niches, then your content must be good. You cannot take the scatter shot approach that more diverse sites can where they can just throw a ton of different content at you and hope there's something in there for everyone. Femdom Worship is about femdom material, which limits the scope and their ability to make diverse videos.

That being said, Femdom Worship has managed to bring some really impressive content to the internet. The specificity of their categories really adds to this I think. Facesitting may or may not end up in screwing too, but you know you are going to see facesitting stuff through 75% of the video.

This is nice because frankly I get tired of downloading 1gb videos just to see two minutes of facesitting or strapon sex. The videos here are good enough quality (NOT HD) and small enough in clips size, or really even the full length ones too, that you can download them fast and they don't take up a lot of room on your hdd.

Rant: Porn sites have gotten too complicated in some ways, and it's nice to see ole school sites like this still managing to prove what we all really know deep down inside; quality over quantity. Yeah, you may pretty much see everything they have to offer within a few months, less probably, but at least what you are seeing is worth paying for. Basically for the price of a few porn DVDs or Blu Rays you're going to end up with a lot more video that is all good. You could actually think of this as buying a 10-20 hour DVD set of niche material that will cost you more anyway for being "fetish."

Yes, they could improve their search capabilities, but then again, I think searching is getting too overrated in some cases. You know what niches exist at sites like this, take a little time to stop and smell the roses. Browsing is fun!

The real bottom line is that for a month or two this site will deliver. It's not the greatest femdom site, but the content is pretty top notch. Having seen the content, I would buy these clips or videos individually, so paying for a site membership for a few months is certainly a reasonable bargain. I should also add that they are updating fairly often, so in another year this may actually be a fairly huge site if they keep up their pace (no less than 2-3 times a week). If this happens, and they at least created a model index, I would certainly consider raising their score up into the 90s.

03-30-12  10:30am

Replies (0)
Review
18
Visit Public Disgrace

Public Disgrace
(2)

93.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Content is top notch, especially given the fact that a lot of these are shot outdoors with a camcorder. Video quality is all pretty high, though you are only given three choices: high, med. and low. High ends up being a mix of different ratios, but most of the newer stuff is pretty large and HD. Expect files sizes nearing 1gb at this level.

Extreme hardcore. This really is a no holds barred cage match. The name says it all.

Good production values and overall quality. This isn't just some shop or home operation. They actually do get out into the streets, though usually in a foreign country, or go to sites (in the US)for a themed shoot. The latter is what I prefer as they are the ones most likely to star a well known porn star.

You never know what will happen. That's awesome. Sometimes people just join in and suddenly there's more than one action to watch. And some of the locations also feed into the fantasy, such as comic book shops, porn theaters, bars, etc.
Cons: Search is fairly limited. In all fairness these scenes would be hard to tag because they tend to range and include so many things. Basic search options are things like small or large tits, race, age. You cannot search for any type of action or location. Location is something I would like to see included.

You have a finite amount of time that a download manager will work before they shift the pages around on you. Admittedly, this is not a big problem here as this isn't really the type of place you will be downloading mass quantities due to the size of their files and the length of the videos.

It's pretty obvious where the line between reality and fantasy is, especially in their outdoor shoots. It's always the same couple of "strangers" that show up and screw the girl. Other strangers are allowed to interact to some degree. However, and rightly so, they are obviously having to screen potential players in advance.
Bottom Line: This is a really good site if you are into the more extreme BDSM and public sex. I knocked some points off for their limited search capability and overall site layout, which probably would have earned them a score of 95-98.

Content-wise they are hard to compare since there are very few sites like this one. I personally would like to see some male subs from time to time, but that apparently is reserved for other kink.com sites. You can see some big names here like Bobby Starr and Lily LaBeau.

I think ultimately this will be one of those sites you join for a month or so and then move on, perhaps to the other kink.com sites. It would be nice if they would start cutting people deals or allowing them to switch sites within their network from month to month. Personally, I left after a month, but this was due only to my own personal interests in this subject matter. Others may find it more to their liking and stick around longer.

So why did I rank it so high if I was leaving after only one month? All in all the site really is well done and deserves the score it got, despite my own tastes or preferences. I also ranked it so high because it is a kink.com site, and they are all top notch sites. Even if this particular site does not appeal to you I would still recommend checking out their other fetish sites.

03-27-12  11:56am

Replies (2)
Review
19
Visit Subby Hubby

Subby Hubby
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Nice selection of content. Most of the videos seem to be in the form of stories or very thematic sequences of events. They are episodic in nature, which leads me to believe this will be the most common form of updates. Most series seem to be about three to five episodes, and you can download them in their entirety (once they are complete I assume)or as individual clips. They have a selection of download options, including an HD wmv (the rest are SD wmv, mp4, and mobile. They use a flash streamer. Pic quality is good and you can download in a full hi-res zip.

As to content, this is one of the best features. This is cuckolding, bdsm, and general femdom activities. One nice feature is that they actually tag the scenes (a rarity for niche sites)so you can tell which ones have strapon or bi-sex blowjob content, for example. It pretty much ranges the full gambit of femdom. The models are not skanks.They are mixed and you will probably find an attraction to over half of them, if not most.
Cons: Download options could be better. If you don't like .wmv then this might be a deal breaker for you.

Their pic selection is more limited than there videos, which is odd (it's usually the other way around). Some of this stuff doesn't translate as well to photo, so it wasn't an issue to me. But, if you are a pic junkie then don't count on huge photo content here.

This is one of those sites that messes with download managers. If you are downloading something it pretty much locks the site for you till it's done. It's the usual workaround, just load up all the vids you want to your download manager first and then start downloading.
Bottom Line: Since this is a brand new site I couldn't rate it any higher than 90. Part of that final number will be dependent on their ability to update and provide fresh new content. It may be a year before we can really gauge that.

That being said, I was really amazed at the amount of content right out of the gate. A lot of good submissive husband videos. The cons were all negligible to me, but I can see where some people may take issue with the cons I mentioned and I am afraid their site will lose potential subscriptions if they don't address these issues.

Niche sites like this are hard to come by. This really is a quality that is beyond what most fetish sites will provide. There use of tags and description make selections easy. The episodic nature of the videos makes them interesting to watch, as well as masturbate to. I'm not saying it's story over form, but since femdom relies so heavily on dialogue and non-sexual actions, as well as the hardcore porn elements, it is an extremely welcome bonus to actually see videos like these.

If you are really into femdom/cuckold niche then this site is a must try. Those of you who are just curious about it would be better off with sites that offer a wider variety of fetishes. As far as a specific, niche, fetish site goes, this is hands down one of the better ones I have seen. If they last I would expect to see them in the ranks of Cuckold Cream and the likes, or even kink.com material.

03-26-12  03:58pm

Replies (2)
Review
20
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
(2)

95.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Wide selection of models, videos, and pics due to a long standing in the community. They are one of the oldest working porn sites in general, but especially for niche porn. This is hirsute, hairy girls, and you can search for various factors, very general ones like "armpits" or "action." What's best is there is a little bit of everything "hairy" here. If you like solo girls, there's plenty of content. But if you like some action there is plenty of m/f and f/f content ranging from full frontal soft-core to full blown hardcore. What's more, most of the models that appear at We Are Hairy also appear here, such as Ryanne and Fawna. Video and pic quality is pretty good for the newer stuff, and you usually have a selection of about four or five video qualities (new ones often have HD options also). Pics are downloadable in a single zip file. Lately they have also been ramping up a lot more free cam shows with some pretty big ATK names, so that's been a real plus and I hope they keep that up.
Cons: Search engine is a little dated and clunky. It gets the job done, but the way it displays results could definitely use an update. It accepts download managers usually, but only for a limited time. I find that if I wait more than a few hours it often shifts the page on me.
Bottom Line: For niche porn this site has become one of the biggest and most well known. I have argued that it's a better deal than We Are Hairy simply because they both have many of the same models, but ATK seems to have a. a lot more content, and b. a much greater variety in that content, such as softcore vs. hardcore, solo vs. couple, etc. It's also a site that you will never fully rip, and well worth investing, and saving money in the long run, in the multiple month subscriptions. I would recommend three months easily if you are a hirsute enthusiast.

03-25-12  10:43pm

Replies (0)
Review
21
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)

97.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: It's hard to discuss Abby Winters in terms of porn sites because this is simply not the usual porn site. There is a reason it has remained one of the top rated sites of all time for the last decade. It ranges from the dainty petting softcore stuff you expect from a couple of bi-curious girls to penetration bordering on XXX. You are never going to see anything too hard or edgy here, and that's what most people like about this site. It is a sort of sweet, touching, beautiful, natural type of porn that's hard to even want to call it "porn."

The video quality here is good and as you get into the more recent stuff a lot of it is HD. I like their system for selection video quality. You just click one of four boxes next to a video, and the next time that's where it will default to, or the closest lower setting in the case of older videos. They tend to clip them, but there are usually no more than three. Navigation is also very well cross listed with keywords, so searching is a breeze.
Cons: So, here's the only downside to Abby Winters, and it is a personal issue that you may not be as bothered by, but the whole premise of the natural girl having real, natural sex is great, and it is beautiful and tender. But, it also leaves no room for originality or individuality. Simply put, it all kind of starts to look the same after awhile. You'll find your favs, like Chloe B, and you will download everything she has and love it, and you'll do the same for the next ten girls. But after a few months I found myself just checking in occasionally, and when I did I downloaded one or two things here and there and before long I was maybe getting a couple of videos a week from them. Couldn't really justify the price. It's hard to stay a member at sites like this for long.
Bottom Line: Look, if you have never had a membership to Abby Winters it is certainly worth a month. They offer a pretty good deal for three months, and I think it's worth a few months of being able to download stuff from them. If you're like me you will probably tire of them, or you will basically have gotten all you really need from their site to keep you happy in the future. Either way, this site deserves support. They are a unique and enlightened businesswomen, and they are offering a quality product. It's just they are dedicated to pretty much one or two things, lesbian sex and masturbation, so it's hard for them to really offer a wide range of porn. This is true of many sites. One speaks volumes is the fact that Abby Winters has been around for so long and has been recognized by so many as one of the industry's best. In many ways they have sort of become the PLAYBOY of the internet.

02-12-12  12:01pm

Replies (1)
Review
22
Visit Ferro Network

Ferro Network
(0)

94.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: So many videos, so many sites. Yes some of them get cross listed, but for the most part they are providing a lot of specific niche material. I actually think they have a pretty smart business model, charge big up front, because lets face it people are going to rip the sites in a month or so, then lessen the fees as time goes by. It's a pretty smart thing to do. Anyone balking at the price might consider this.

Basically you get a shit ton of nylon sites, which are actually really good sites even if you aren't into the fetish. They have a lot of femdom strapon stuff, some mature stuff, bisexual, and more. The newer vids are pretty good in terms of quality. There's still very little HD at this site because they just started adding some HD stuff. I know that is a peeve for some people. However, the fetish stuff their offering is pretty unique, and sometimes it has to be more about the content than the quality. Most of the models are pretty hot too.
Cons: There is no BDSM or Cuckold stuff here for some reason. The BDSM I get, but seems like cuckold sites would be right up their alley, or his....;)

Older vids are pretty damn old. Low quality for the low bandwidth days. They get progressively better though.

Very little search and navigation capability.

Like the others have said, you have to manually log in to each site. The problem is you have to do it with a very cryptic username and password they assign to you. That's why everyone is complaining. They're too hard to remember. Type it into a doc and just cut and paste with your browser set to remember the passwords.
Bottom Line: Yes, it's expensive. Yes, it's worth it. Let's be clear. This is a softer domination site, so if you're looking for extreme hardcore BDSM and femdom, not a good choice for you. If you are looking for nylon fetish, feminization, humiliation, men getting ass fucked by men and women, women getting as fucked by men and women,tranny sex, mature sex, masturbation, gay and bisexual sex, then this is a damn good choice.

02-09-12  08:19pm

Replies (3)
Review
23
Visit Cuckold Cream

Cuckold Cream
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The video's and pics are quality cuckold, though it will be the standard "I need a black dick" scenario every time. The production value is there, the girls are hot, but the action is a little, well, pedantic.

You also get access to their other sites, which are exclusive, but also pretty run of the mill. In terms of niche there might be a few that will interest you, but I found them all pretty boring.
Cons: Video is in one format only (wmv) but they do give you a choice of different qualities and sizes. Still, the content is just uninspired, and it looks like pretty much the same cuck videos we've seen a hundred times before. Admittedly, the white chick needing a black dick and making her husband watch scenario may work for you, I still don't think they offer enough here to really impress you beyond what you have seen before.

I list this under cons just because I'm sure there are a few of you out there who will want to know, but there is no bi-sexual, forced bisexuality, or anything more extreme than a girl fucking another guy in front of her significant other.

As of Feb. 2012, canceling with their online system does not work! I had to send two emails to get them to cancel before my trial ran out. Be careful of this.
Bottom Line: It might be worth taking the trial run at them just to see if there is anything beyond this site, such as their tranny site or their teen site, that might interest you. However, with the cancellation issues I had, I wouldn't risk it.

02-08-12  10:12pm

Replies (1)
Review
24
Visit Kneel Beg Crawl

Kneel Beg Crawl
(0)

50.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: There may be a few videos here you will like, for the most part though it's pretty much homemade crap. Bad quality, low-rent, and obviously being shot in the same handful of apartments every time. The chicks are pretty hot. This looks like a half ass attempt by a few working or up and coming stars to start their own site. Unfortunately they fail miserably.
Cons: There's no index or navigation worth a flip on this site. Basically you get to choose between a few links that take you to pages that look like something right out of 1998. A bunch of pictures just haphazardly splashed across the page under pics, some really badly typed descriptions of videos, and all sorts of broken links and missing image files. Low rent doesn't even begin to describe this site. The video quality is average on their movies, but the content is pretty questionable in terms of value. The pics are not professional looking. Basically they are counting on the fact that the girls are hot to carry everything. But there are just as good looking women working on a lot better quality sites than this one, so it begs the question as to whether this is really worth your money.
Bottom Line: Basically you are looking at a very small amount of videos for what they charge, and you will have seen them all within a day. Even if you like them, you'll end up with maybe ten that are worth keeping. For the price they are charging it is really not a good value when you could join any other site and will immediately be stepping up from this very archaic looking site.

02-08-12  09:48pm

Replies (0)
Review
25
Visit Strapon Dreamer

Strapon Dreamer
(0)

95.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The level of porn here is clearly in the upper echelons compared to most sites. Simply put, this place is really top notch. The girls are all pretty gorgeous, and the production value is good quality. They are catering to a few kinks here as well as the strapon femdom. There are occasionally cuckold fantasies, lesbian bondage, and generally something that will cater to your edgier whims. This is not a full blown BDSM site, though there's plenty of it, but it focuses more on the domination angle and ass fucking men with strapons than the whips and chains (though a few are about 50/50).

They actually have a unique feature that seems to be very popular in that that let you write your own fantasies on a message board and if they pick it they will model their shoot after it. They also have some social networking dedicated to these types of interests. So, all in all it has actually turned out to be one of those sites I spend quite a bit of time at. Plenty to do.
Cons: Unfortunately they are a niche site with a very specific niche, so the amount of videos to date is limited. The selection of formats is limited, but that isn't a real huge issue. It's still quality video, most of it being HV or HD. Where they lack in volume they more than make up for in content and quality.
Bottom Line: Yes, it's a little more expensive, but it is a niche site. I thought I would pay my dues and leave in a month, but I'm still there. Will I keep it for a full year, probably not. Will I give it at least a three or four months, definitely.

02-06-12  08:48pm

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-25 of 27 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.1 seconds.