Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Jaimes (3)  

Feedback:   All (14)  |   Reviews (3)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (11)

Other:   Replies Received (5)  |   Trust Ratings (12)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-3 of 3  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit Student Sex Parties

Student Sex Parties
(0)

60.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Cute girls.
Girls (for the most part) don't look like porn stars.
Exclusive content.
Bonus sites with WTF pass.
Cons: Unbelievably bad camera work on the majority of videos.
Photo albums are often incomplete AND redundant.
Often videos contain girls that don't get naked or only topless.
Distracting and annoying subtitles and MOVING watermarks.
Other peoples niche chocolate in my porn peanut butter.
Bottom Line: STUDENT SEX PARTIES has every single problem that modern porn is guilty of:a propensity to try to satisfy too many niches that should NOT be part of porn sought by the demographic that seeks orgies: I would say MOST of this demographic do not want to see CFNM,(clothed females naked males)urination or worse.(seriously, what kind of a twisted twist wants to see girls getting "sick" in porn) We want to see naked girls! Often girls don't even get naked, or the camera is at an angle so we only see men's butts. Not a pretty sight.Also,girl's stripping (one of the most erotic ingredients to good porn) is often either completely missing, avoided or badly botched in extreme close-ups. Speaking of camera work. Hire a professional please! None of their "frat boys" seem to know a thing about head space or framing and the constant attention-span whiplashes often made me sea sick. In some videos it was so bad, it ruined the video and I deleted it. The ONLY time the camera seemed to stop for any period and hold still, was for the many, many, many blow jobs. Then there is the distracting subtitles (who cares what inane things they say! And trust me, they say quite a plethora of inanities)and ESPECIALLY the site's little MOVING postmark that mar EVERY single video. The downloads were incredibly slow.(one site took me 2 months to get through-often wasting hours only to find that that video could not download and I had to try a different download option) As to the rest of the "bonus" sites. Only ONE reason I even bothered to look at any of them: to find girls that didn't get naked in Student Sex Parties for "completion." Sometimes I did. Many times I was frustrated. Oh,one more thing:WTF stop insisting these parties are real and not staged with porn actors. Stop insulting our intelligence so you can get away with all of the stupidity above! Overall, a few decent picture sets and video, but A LOT of garbage to wade through. If you are OCD like me and a completest, you will have many hours editing the videos to subtract the redundant, gross and annoying watermarks.Not worth more than a month of your time.

11-10-13  01:48pm

Replies (2)
Review
2
Visit Haze Her

Haze Her
(1)

60.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Cute girls.
SOME photo sets are clear and high quality.
Good basic concept.
Cons: Only 4-6 girls on average get totally naked.
Don't be fooled NOT REAL!!!
Some photo sets are not so clear.
Photo sets seem to promise on average 500-1000 photos. BUT most sets have nearly the exact set of photos in triplicate. Expect redundancy.
Some photo sets don't ZIP.
Some Screen Caps (happened three times)don't ZIP.
The concept of lots of naked girls in a sorority is fine. It doesn't need the callous and disgusting "humiliation" trend.
No bonus sites. Pricey for 15 sets.
don't exist and you are treated to 642 shots of a title page.
Bottom Line: If it was anything else NO ONE would excuse
this site's callousness, sloppiness and constant technical obstacles.

What a bloody disappointment this site has been.

Hey look, I know The Bang Brothers are secret homosexuals who just care about, apparently, seeing a man's dick every thirty seconds but for us STRAIGHT guys when you put 15 cute girls in a room but only 4-6 ,on average, get naked it's NOT COOL.

Whoever thought that this is even remotely acceptable is a bloody twit.

In addition, should a zip drive take HOURS to load. I don't think so. Don't have that problem with other sites...

The Bang Brothers are consummate con artists. The only reason they claim their websites are real is because they are greedy and lazy. By using the "reality" cover they can pay porn stars more cheaply to be extras.

The reality cover also, apparently, supplies them a reason to hire ADD afflicted cameramen who have NO idea on how to frame a shot. (for ten years I worked making movies-so I DO know)

This laziness extends to the pic sections. Instead of editing for only the best they throw batches of redundancy at us and we need to do the extra work to weed them out. Often the screen caps are too blurry to be of any use.

They could just forgo the screen caps IF the pictures showed ALL the action, but of course that would mean more thought and care into the process and they must insist (no matter if it's so ridiculous a notion as to be ludicrous) that the sites are "reality" based.

(don't fool yourselves:they are NOT real. Several websites have done the research for me. I have a list started and one by one I am filling in the porn stars for each set...)

Here is the thing. I DON'T CARE if it's real. I don't really want it to be. It's all about fantasy.

And most porn companies RUIN that fantasy over and over again by mucking it up with awful camera work that inspire you to reach for the Dramamine, (not your dick) CFNM and CFNF, callousness (this whole humiliating trend has to go) and just plain grossness.

The bottom line. CUTE GIRLS SHOULD NEVER BE EXTRAS IN PORN. You bring out a gun in act one. It should be used in act two.

I hope to the superior being of your choice that SOMEONE finally wises up and actually creates a website for straight guys that want to see multiple girls get totally naked at parties without the stupidity of CFNM or CFNF which leads one to do extra work cutting everything out so that just the girls that get naked remain.

07-30-12  03:02pm

Replies (2)
Review
3
Visit Tainster

Tainster
(1)

60.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This is a mega site that includes the two powerhouse flagships Drunk Sex Orgy and Party Hardcore. Beautiful women. Good cinematography. Quality video downloads. For those into C.F.N.M, extreme bondage, and other like minded trends, there is plenty to admire.
Cons: Tainster, to begin with, is an awful name and it is an omen to what tastes the creator has decided to focus on. This sight has been built from the superior bones of Orgy Maxx. Eromaxx has always been a very bizarre frustration for me. Drunk Sex Orgy, one of the most brilliant ideas in the porn universe: huge orgies shot with quality equipment in sophisticated nightclubs, has been rendered nearly impotent by it's constant fantasy betrayals, like using the same exact cast while 75% of the rest of the girls remain fully clothed. Frustrating and ridiculous. Another great idea: the shower hose on stage, is usually rendered a prop for more frustration. Very rarely do pretty girls get naked under it. They just tease us in between the "set" cast pieces. Party Hardcore is even more frustrating. I don't care if it's real or not. Seeing 6-7 girls get naked out of 75-100 is, again, frustrating. Those are the two big flagship sites. Rest, in my opinion, should NOT even be bundled with orgy sites.
Bottom Line: I was disappointed years ago, but it still had enough promise that I went back hoping to find the old Orgy Max stuff in better quality (I only have lousy MPEG versions of the old stuff)as the founder promised back in 2010.

To my shock, Tainster had pretty much taken them all out! Drunk Sex Orgy only has the events from 2007 on, while Wam Sex is completely gone, replaced by soft core All Wam.(where in many of the events no one even gets naked!)

Instead Tainster offers up useless cam shows (in an upgraded package) and sites that feature Bukkake, C.F.N.M, or worse. (not my cup of java) And then there is the silliness of Party Softcore. Um,... note to the special kind of idiots: TOPLESSNESS IS NOT PORN!!!

There is SOME good stuff. Enough for say, a months perusing. There is a fair amount of pictures and videos. Even entire DVDs.(but if you are like me and hate to watch anything over 5 minutes on your computer, it means probably transferring the MP4 format to a DVD player format with a significant loss of quality)

However, the death of the old Orgy Max material is the major tragedy, as there is NO place to buy this material. (I should note, I have purchased every one of the D.S.O. and Party Hardcore DVDS, except six, to date. I plan on editing them into much more fantasy enabling, but with better music, masterpieces some day)

As to the actual Tainster site itself, it is not as user friendly as it could be, with very noisy menus and clunky features.

The price has been lowered a little since the Orgy Maxx days but it still is nearly $40.00. (depending on the dollar fluctuation of the Euro) A bit steep for those interested in only the straight orgy sites.

But if you like C.F.N.M, Bondage,Bukkake and the like, you will find much more to enjoy here.

Me? I am going to start wearing black all the time. Grieving for the loss of Orgy Maxx and the incremental decline of non frustrating porn in general...

07-29-11  01:17pm

Replies (6)

Shown : 1-3 of 3  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.9 seconds.