Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : RustyJ (145)  

Feedback:   All (1098)  |   Reviews (71)  |   Comments (136)  |   Replies (891)

Other:   Replies Received (503)  |   Trust Ratings (51)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 76 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit The Training Of O

The Training Of O
(1)

93.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Almost 350 scenes to date. The site has been running since 2007
-Very high quality company in general, they seem to be the good guys in porn if you can look past that one non voluntary bruising of a model case that was reported a while back
-Armory in San Francisco proveides for a great site to shoot this kind of material
-Very high production and innovative bdsm ideas
-Great selection and variety of models
-Good amount of hardcore sex included
-Makes a creative mix of the different niches on various Kink sites
Cons: -Scenes are sort of splitted into "days". That means you get usually 3-4 updates from the same model in similar settings. However the are full length each so this might turn out to be pro when you particularly like the model in question
-Humiliating, slave training, doing chores and so on might not be to everyones tastes even if they are generally into bdsm niche. Often a bit too non sexual in my opinion
-Always the same with Kink: No kind of network subscription or ability to mix between sites available
-Dedicated photo sessions would be nice touch but obviously they'd require lot of extra effort
-On the pricier side when it comes to cost per update
Bottom Line: The Training of O is a themed site on Kink.com network that focuses on slave training. The material is divided into "training days" of each individual slave trainee where they are tested for different skills like pain tolerance, anal
sex, cleaning the toilet and what not. Usually there is up to four days of each slave's training. Occassionally they throw in an auditioning scene where they are selecting candidates fo their training that are made to look like slave market of some sort. In the end of the training they might be presented to the master of the Armory in their "Upper Floor" setting.

There is lot of role playing and acting involved. Scenes or days may start with the slave waking up with some kind of diary writing, instruction or grade giving and such activity that is nice touch for those who really can get into make believe. Personally I'm more int the actual sex in this scenes so there is quite much overhead in these videos.

When you look past the make believe, you'll find that this site is quite nice mix of much of the non gay niches found on this network in general. There are scenes that look like Hogtied or Device Bondage with some Sex And Submission thrown in. The only difference is that especially lately the penetrating male performer tends to be a gimp kind of guy, usually in bondage himself too and wearing some full body latex suit. Lots of whipping, caning, forced bj's too. Fetishwear, stocks, wooden boxes over the girls's heads, you name it, they probably got it.

The site and it's functionality really doesn't need another round of praise from me. It all works flawlessly and smoothly with download speeds exceeding what most can get through their broadbands. DL managers work fine. Photos are zipped but as with other sites here, the photos are more like a side product taken during shooting video. The sites are not really cheap if you consider the once a week update rate but you can always sign in and wait for a 19,99$ rebate. Higly recommendable site, especially for the variety.

05-09-13  03:00am

Replies (5)
Review
2
Visit Butt Plays

Butt Plays
(1)

80.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Weekly update when updating
-Very hardcore material. Not quite as hard as Gapeland used to be in the beginning but that was almost over the top
-In the 24 scenes they have so far, there is not one with a mediocre looking girl.
-Fresh models that I haven't seen elsewhere before. Many are hot enough so that you later see them in films by likes of Rocco Siffredi
-All the 21Sextury pros (and cons) apply on this site too. Technical side is near perfect, site is clear in design and works flawlessly. Servers are fast.
Cons: -Updates have been a little erratic
-Almost like Gapeland, cannot tell which scene is from which
-Rather new, only updating since August 2012 so they have only 24 scenes so far and few of those are actually halves of a split scene
-Again, only one girl per scene
Bottom Line: ButtPlays is the lates addition to the anally themed sites on 21Sextury network. Why this was actually started up is not all clear to me. The scenes are very similar to ones released on their site Gapeland these days. They actually even feature same actresses around the same time. When you take in consideration that both sites fail to update from time to time, I cannot see the point in two separate ones. It has been a flaw of the whole network to release new sites and then terminate them within a year or so.

I remember Gapeland when it started, the stuff seemed almost a bit too extreme but it has tamed considerably since then in my opinion. Being very similar, this site features nothing shocking, just anal scenes, often without any vaginal or more standard action. So far every scene is one on one.

Female talent is very good on this site too. It seems that the dip has only happened on the cuties site that used to feature really hot Russians. The names here are not the most well known but some of them are sure to make appearance with other European studios too and some actually already have. While the action is not too extreme, some of the guys are bit on the brutal side like that Rocco's sidekick Omar Galanti who I'm not very fond of.

The style of these sites is a bit more gonzo than on the more produced AssholeFever and DPFanatics. While the quality is good, there is none of the glamour like feeling that you have on those two sites. It's all sharp and crisp but not really artistic or anything like that. Good for friends of photography and videos equally.

With Gapeland going already at 111 scenes, this one is little more but more of the same. While it's great that they release more of this kind of videos, this is not really a needed addition. As I mentioned, the girls on these two sites have been the same ones lately. Then again, I guess the number of offered sites is a marketing tool so the bigger numbers are good for them.

If this site was larger and if it featured more unique content in this network, the score would be considerably higher. If this and Gapeland was one part of this network, I'd rate them 90 together.

02-01-13  02:34am

Replies (4)
Review
3
Visit DP Fanatics

DP Fanatics
(1)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -368 scenes, more than half on them in HD, mostly 1080p
-Superb photography from the very beginning, large photosets included and also available zipped. These days the high res photo size is more than enough
-Gorgeous models all over from the earlier time greats like Simony Diamond and Alexa May to the fresher names like Doris Ivy and Ashley. Nothing to complain as long as you are in to European looks
-As is the case with AssholeFever, same can be said here: Always gives what you expect, which is a DP
-The whole 21Sextury works flawlessly in my opinon these days. Fast, good looking, easy to navigate
-If the theme is what you like, this network has a few others updating regularly with anal stuff. Gapeland, ButtPlays and AssholeFever are more or less active and very focused
Cons: -Only updates every second week these days
-Even here they could have multiple girls in a scene even though the numbers are more understandable for an apparent reason
-You could say that as whole the 21Sextury is not going through it's best days. Many sites were split over to 21Sextreme and especially the sites like AnalTeenAngels, CutiesGalore and LezCuties are not doing so strong
Bottom Line: Another one of the two top sites that are in my opinion holding the whole 21Sextury together with their regular update schedules and consistent quality. I thought this one also deserved a heads up and while I adjusted score on AssholeFever up, this one I think I had given a bit too high score and am now dropping it to more reasonable number.

This site used to be a weekly updating with rather guaranteed update until some time in 2012 when it changed to one update every two weeks. Like AssholeFever, this site has been going on for a long time and is probably produced together with it. I would guess that they shoot anal and dp content without really making a difference between and only then release them according to the content on either of these two sites.

One of the best things about DPFanatics is the very high quality of almost every aspect. There is no compromising with the models, they are almost 100% hot (guys are the same few for those who care). Same can be said of production values and the quality of video and photography. Lighting is very professional, image is always crisp and still they can manage to keep the file sizes in reasonable limits. I cannot find anything to complain about with the mp4 H.264 files in 1080p. Old scenes are great too even if the quality of the video is not the best. The photos however are.

While there is really no story to the scenes, they are not straight forward gonzo action either. Settings are varied, scenes are often shot outdoors as well as in various interiors. They have some themed scenes as well with hospitals, nurse costumes, unavoidable holiday themes, jails and such. Nothing too fetishy. However it seems that the current director is not a big fan of outdoors as there has been very little of that lately.

This was one of the sites that originally drew me to the 21Sextury and it is still one of the few I really like. Many of the absolute best scenes in the networks are released here.

01-31-13  06:04am

Replies (0)
Review
4
Visit Asshole Fever

Asshole Fever
(1)

93.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -One of the 21Sextury sites that seemingly never fails to update. And I go knock on the wood
-Has kept the high quality and production values over the years
-Consistently hot models, no dips like on their cutie themed sites. They seem to bring all the hot newcomers to this site quite soon
-100% anal scenes. It never hurts to know what to expect
-Photography is top quality even on the older scenes that may not be viewable on video anymore because of the low resolution
-458 scenes, more than half of them are HD, mostly 1080p with a short transition period of 720p scenes
-Cheap total cost, high download speeds (over 10 megabytes per second) with dl manager, very reasonable file sizes, zipped images in two different sizes. Everything is technically ok
Cons: -Too strictly sticking to the subsites, it appears that 21Sextury does not want to give DP on any other sites but DPFanatics so that's a rare sight here too. No matter how many guys in the scene
-Threesomes and bigger groups almost always have only one girl and many guys. Possibly the biggest content problem in entire 21Sextury
Bottom Line: I cannot remember why I gave this particular site a lowish score of 85 years back. Maybe I was still adjusting my scoring range or something. However as I was going through the different sites of 21Sextury, wondering at the loss of quality in my eyes, I soon noticed that there was two sites where the quality is still as good as always, this one and DPFanatics.

With almost every other site on this network going through worse times quality wise every now and then or having gaps in update schedule, I would almost say that this one is a major site holding the whole thing thogether. The girls are almost always of the absolute top class, the action is invariably hard and the updates come regularly. Production values are good with very high quality photography and sharp video at up to 1080p in H-264 mp4.

More than half of the over 450 videos are in HD, 720p or 1080p with a majority in 1080p. 720p seemed to be only a transition phase for the whole 21Sextury before FullHD releases started. The older stuff is not really bad but often sub DVD quality that doesn't really shine today. The good thing is that the photos are excellent from the first scene. At some point they also strated includeing higres photosets with images that are large enough for even the biggest displays in the market.

I have really no big gripes with this one. They really seem to avoid DP's on purpose, maybe simply releasing those scenes on DPFanatics. Sadly that site has been reduced to updating only every other week. Also the same old thing that I've mentioned with every review of sites in this network is the fact that guys almost always outnumber girls. After a few weeks membership you probably already know all those guys by their names.

This particular subsite would be a close to 100 point site with some minor adjustments. Bring in more girls being the number one. Probably one of maybe two or three sites that keeps me subscribing to the whole network at the moment.

01-27-13  06:25am

Replies (3)
Review
5
Visit Seymore Butts

Seymore Butts
(2)

88.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Cheap. 9.95$ a month is a bargain. One pint less a month and you've saved the cost of this site. No regional pricing nonsense either.
-Exclusive Seymore Butts content. I really do like his stuff and the man himself is ok too which is important since directors appearing in their own stuff are usually douche bags
-Superb female models that rarely appear in anybody elses videos. Alisha Klass, Mari Possa and McKayla Matthews in particular
-Streaming video quality is good and they work fast
-Decent download speeds over 6 megabytes per second. DL managers work, no download limitations
-Strong ass focus (both female and male) not seen on many sites. This might also be a con for some
-Fun, relaxed approach and atmosphere in scenes
-More girls than guys in nearly every scene. I wish other sites also understood how important this is. I'm talking especially about you 21Sextury
Cons: -Video comment sections are spammed full of nonsense links and nobody seems to care
-Some few downloadable wmv videos are badly encoded and horribly pixelated like watching lego porn. This problem looks exactly like "HD" videos on Hustler site. The streaming versions are ok. These are the clips which don't say they are taken from a certain DVD title
-Unreasonably large files. 40 minutes of upscaled wmv can take two and half gigabytes
-Many "HD" files are upscaled normal definition material which is pretty obvious when you consider that models like Alisha Klass quit before HD was invented. TBP should notice things like this in professional reviews. Not sure if there's a single scene shot in HD
-No photos
-No onsite option to cancel your subscription. Luckily the biller is SegPay and it is very easy to do on their site
-Bad preview as mentioned in the discussion on the comments section. You must take the plunge to see if they have the titles you do not have yet
Bottom Line: I took the chance to subscribe a non VOD Seymore Butts site the moment I noticed one was available. I'm generally strongly oppsed to any porn with the director having a strong role in with few exceptions and those include Seymore Butts (well, if you can get by his hairdo) and Rocco Siffredi. These are examples of guys who don't appear total douche when chatting with models or participating themself. I guess everyone knows at least the name Seymore Butts, with all the reality show and stuff he's maybe one of the most recognized names in the industry.

Over the years it seemed that very little changed in Seymore's style. His titles were very similar in general theme with all being kind of home made gonzo porn. Even his studio name reflected this. A typical scene starts with Seymore entering his house or swimming pool area while shooting freehand only to eventually find some people having sex in his house after placing his groceries in the fridge, feeding the dog or doing other similar activity. Sometimes he's himself in the action, usually with the camera seemingly on a tripod or shooting handheld in POV style. The production values are low but the action is fun and genuine feeling with good enough quality.

Seymore has strong focus on anal sex and girls so all is good there. You can expect to see more females than males on these scenes but be warned: You'll also see lots of male ass as that is one niche he seems to be fond of. Nothing as heavy as strapon action though but lots of licking, fingering and some toys. In the end it's the females who get the harder treatment. Every scene is hardcore, no posing or soft stuff. Some girl/girl scenes but even they usually have guys entering sooner or later.

Models are very high quality, the most famous ones being those who Seymore used to date (or possibly be married with) at the times, Alisha Klass, Mari Possa, Taylor Hayes and Shane. There are few others too who used to work with him a lot, McKayla Matthews being the personal favorite of mine.

Most of the material comes from Seymore's DVD releases and are labeled accordingly to which one they are taken from. The scenes are long and they seem to be upscaled quite nicely. There are also some shorter ones with very nasty pixelation that requires media player post processing to be viewable. Those pixelated scenes are quite easy to tell apart by significantly smaller file size and not being from any named DVD title. Strangely they look very good streaming. The DVD titles scenes are upscaled to 720p, a practice which I'm not entirely in favor of as it ends up wasting space without bringing in more information. The quality is as good as it gets with the originals though so I'm not complaining.

To date this site has some 150+ scenes and updates roughly once a week. As you can also read from the discussion under comments section, Symore Butts is probably very much not active director so I don't think it's realistic to expect anything new here. Also worth noticing is that this site doesn't have nearly all his videos (at least not yet) and the previews aren't very helpful so if you are a fan of his with a collection downloaded from elsewhere (this is not exclusive stuff by any means) or even bought on DVD's, you are going to find lots of stuff you already have. Then again, less than 10$ isn't going to make too big gap in your budget compared to the cost of some more popular sites here.

Slight nitpickings would include automatic streaming video start upon loading a scene page and the totally nonsense file names. For the sake of knowing what you have, I'd like all sites to follow some logic in their file naming if they don't want to put the actual name of the scene in it. Personally I could easily rate this site as high as 90 or more as my past with Seymore is more like good memories than a large collection. I would also factor the price in. It's not often that you find something this cheap and with a known biller to give more security. My high'ish rating reflects what they give me at this low price and leaves out the fact that they could give me even more.

01-21-13  06:50am

Replies (0)
Review
6
Visit VideosZ

VideosZ
(4)

92.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Ridiculous amounts of content. Well over 12000 films totaling over 70000 scenes
-They have brought in good number of 720p HD films. They have close to 700 HD films at the moment
-Very good update rate, lately 5 films per day with one HD release
-Many great studios featured, some like Harmony Films look like they might have actually more material here than on the official sites
-Very good TPB price with no regional billing and using reputable cc billers
-Fast download with DL manager up to over 12MB/s but usually somewhere little below 10. Sometimes the files can get stuck on slower speed
-Very nice site design. Modern and clean looking and has configureable options to fit your personal tastes
Cons: -The scene preview is actually better when you are not logged in. Multiple screenies tell a lot more than the frozen viewer image. You can see more when previewing the whole title. At least it doesn't autoplay the scene (there's an option for that too)
-In site ads
-Some of the older films on the site are not up to DVD quality
-Some suspiciously old films released as "HD" updates caught my eye in previews. Well, they are upscaled and end up just taking more space on your hard drive. Luckily there are not many
-Compilation releases have same scenes as some films released before as original titles
-Could use maybe even more search tags with the huge amount of scenes
-Some releases are quite B-class
-Pre checked cross sale on the cc billers web page
Bottom Line: VideosZ is a very typical site in the genre that is often called DVD site. While the world today has little to do with DVD's, the basic meaning is that you are offered a huge selection of complete film title releases from various studios on one site. Frankly I'm not wholly sure if all of this new stuff even gets a proper DVD or Bluray release on physical media these days but the new content is only a part of the whole deal as these sites feature large archives of older and even vintage releases.

While there's over 200 studios on this site with releases, not all of them have much content or are very high quality. The top ones in the sheer numbers of material are Legend, Red Light District and Platinum X Pictures. Other famous ones or the ones I personally like include Elegant Angel, Private, Harmony Films and Evil Playgrounds. When you go to the actual websites of some of these studios that offer memberships, you might actually notice that on this site you get more material from them for a better price and in better quality. Plus everything else of course. The shortage of material certainly isn't going to be your issue with this site with over 12000 film titles. The shortage of storage space and download bandwidth on the other hand could be ;)

The site updates frequently and here it means "a lot". On average you get five updates per day, one of which is HD release in 720p. The higher resolutions are available in mp4 and there are also smaller avi-files. It's a bit hard to tell if some material available in HD gets released in DVD resolution but one thing is clear: At times they seem to have run out of HD release and fake one. It was indeed suspicious noticing "Zazel: The Scent of Love" as a 720p HD release when I remember this film from when was young (it was shot in 1995 according to Wikipedia and apparently also released as remastered Bluray HD release but apparently the version available on this site is not the true HD one). The quality of the releases is varying without doubt, some are top class and in HD while others are quite mediocre fillers. The quality of more recent releases is good in HD and DVD quality in non HD films. The old stuff doesn't always come close to DVD quality and theses sites aren't too keen remastering old stuff apparently. Obviously it does little to attract new subscribers compared to adding new material.

Of the studios avaiable here, I'm particularly happy with many HD (38 out of 114) and DVD releases from Harmony Films. Very high quality fetishy European stuff from great directors like Tanya Hyde, Strangelove and Gazzman. This site is probably better source of their films than their own site and certainly cheaper! I'm also happy to see a very comprehensive selection of Private DVD's with almost 300 titles on this site. Sadly they are among the older stuff so the quality is not the best around. Paradise Film is another one worth mentioning, not only for good things. A large number of HD releases are from this company that is unknown to me but strangely the scenes are all not. I'm sure I've seen a number of them on sites like DDF and 21Sextury. They also seem like "direct to digital distribution" releases with many same scenes across different titles resultin in lots of duplicates. Their quality is top however.

The site itself is good looking with clean design that works well. Search function works ok and it completes the name of actress or film so it's easier to find what you are looking for. There are also many categories for easier browsing although sometimes you wish for even more as some like "fetish" are quite generic. Downloads are fast, I could manage up to 12MB/s using download manager.

One of the sites to stay on, not just subscribe for a month or two. Again for the cons I had to think quite hard and when I look at what I came up, I feel I'm complaining about nothing really. Remember to buy an extra hard drive first and maybe upgrade your broadband!

01-15-13  06:30am

Replies (4)
Review
7
Visit Explicite Art

Explicite Art
(2)

90.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Some old John B Root films are also available on the site. French Beauty and some others are really top class
-French models you cannot find elsewhere. Also many videos and photosets from the big names from France in their early days
-Mostly exclusive content. Some released as DVD's. They claim to have 750 original videos but quickly looking I'd say there's well over 1000 videos although the early ones are almost unviewable by today's standards
-Newer videos are very good looking 720p (.mov) available in multiple formats in lower res too
-Photos in up to 3000x2000 resolution with kind of amateurish and artful feel. Available as zip archives (the actual files are sometimes 9 folder levels deep inside the zip!)
-Good variation between soft and hard content. From solo posing to anal fisting, dap and such
-Compilation videos are good idea. They are like film releases made from scenes of a same theme. Easier downloading
-Reliable billers and no regional pricing
Cons: -Videos and photosets are separately listed. You have to do some searching to find the matching one if there is such
-Streaming player isn't very good. I couldn't skip forward to parts not yet loaded
-Somewhat mediocre download speeds at little over 3MB/s, sometimes lower, still tolerable. I had some larger 3-5GB compilation type best of files grind to halt or timeouting requiring restart as the downloads are apparently not pauseable
-Site navigation can be a bit clumsy at times, returning blank pages, requesting resending data when navigating with back/forward after filtering and sorting scenes and so on
-Videos can be quite short and skip right into action. Some might consider it a pro
-Condoms. I understand the need but would rather have my porn without
-Compilations feature duplicate content between each other and single scenes (obvious)
-Photos are probably taken during video shoots as they look like they could use more flash light
Bottom Line: John B Root is a French pornographer of some fame and prestige, or so I think. This site is dedicated to his productions with various models and genres. The sortiment is really wide indeed as the site ranges from soft glamour and casting photoshoots to the most hardcore sex imagineable (DP, double anal, fisting all imaginable orifices), often with the very same girls at some later time. The whole site manages to capture sort of classy feeling that has both glam appeal but also sort of amateurish feeling you get with less used models who seem more confortable and often also seen having honest good time with each other. Mostly it's songle shoots but also complete John B Root films are avialable for download. The single scenes are often released at different times as photosets and videos while the full films come with very large attached photosets and usually a making of kind of film as long as the title itself and photosets from that too. The makin of pieces are necessarily not that sexual in content themselves but interesting watch nonetheless when you can see a small team of mostly actors and actresses travel to an exotic spot and shoot a movie filming each other and working as lighting assistant and such in each others scenes.

Photography is obviously in equal role on this site with videos. The photos are large and quite sharp with kind of amateurish but artsy feel to them. Pictures in zips lack on processing and they could be brighter to begin with. Also the are bit lowish on saturation when compared with leading photo sites and the likes of 21Sextury.com and DDFProd. That's partly post processing issue but the photoshoots could be bit better lit. No such issues with videos, they are bright and crisp. Only complaint is that they are bit on the shorter side and you can often see one cameraman in the picture of another camera. Photos are available as zips but even that could have been executed somewhat better. Some zips have 9 levels of loders before you reach the files while others have the file names start with "\" character making them invisible in Windows until extracted with some app like WinRAR.

Video offerings are top class in quality and 720p .mov has reasonable file sizes although it'd be nice to have 720p also in some streamable format. Besides normal single scene or half a scene videos, they also offer compilations that are videos put together from a number of scenes with similar content or same actress. The idea is good since these are easier to download than individual scenes although it's often hard to preview what you'll get. They obviously have duplicate content with the single scenes but sadly also with other compilations so you end up wasting some hd space. The bigger scenes also seem more likely to timeout while downloading. Some feature films are also available for download, and of course few dozen old John B Root classics directed for Marc Dorcel and others.

You can find many models on this site not really found elsewhere. They also have many bigger names that either started here or did scenes with John B Root at some point of their careers. Famous names include Angell Summers, Liza Del Sierra and some really early scenes by Melissa Lauren. Then there's many hot French actresses who probably never made it ouside France or had longer lasting careers in adult entertainment, personally I recognized Mathilda and Ally but if you've seen early 2000's Marc Dorcel DVD's, you'll likely find other familiar faces too.

Technical side is bit shaky here. The download speeds can vary a lot. I never got anything higher than 3,5MB/s when downloading a single file with DL manager but especially with the bigger files the rate may vary a lot, even stopping at timeswith restart needed so prepare with some time before starting download them. The site design is good looking if not so functional, it might be bit hard finding what you are looking for. The embedded streaming viewer is not that good for previewing, especially the big files as you can not skip forward to what has not yet been loaded. When you sort videos or photosets and try to browse back and forth between them, you often get blank (expired) pages sent to you with need to resend data or have your sorting preference disappear. Using right click and open in new tab helps a lot like it did with 21Sextury when they had similar issues.

All in all it's a bit hard to give rating for this site. Content is great in my opinion but the technical side could use some work, especially the slight download issues. Technically I would have rated this site 80 tops but the content is just great and unique and overweights the issues. Most of my cons are just minor nitpicking after all. French porn is sadly quite limited these days and this site is probably the strongest contender at the moment. Personally I wish Marc Dorcel launched a site in English that qualified for TPB.

01-08-13  08:02am

Replies (3)
Review
8
Visit Bound Gangbangs

Bound Gangbangs
(1)

88.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Kink style, Kink quality. This cannot be emphasized too much as the network is clearly the most dedicated player in BDSM fetish scene
-Regular and reliable as all the Kink sites. It supposedly updates once a week and apparently never fails to do so (until now, see the last part of my comments section)
-Wide selection of models ranging from Americans to Europeans. Personal favorites include Angell Summers, Krissy Lynn, Kristina Rose, Charlotte Vale among others
-All scenes are very hard, sometimes too hard with anal and dp almost always included
-You get the new site HardcoreGangbang with the same subscription
Cons: -Bound and Gangbang do not mix well. The latter is hard here while the former is soft and often nonexistent towards the end of the scene
-Roughly 70 scenes is not that much and during a month of subscription you only get four more
-The rumour that you can see in the comments section of this site here on PU might be true and this site ends up softening even more when it comes to bondage reducing it to quite generic one
-Often a bit too messy. The girls should look good, not smear faced even if fits the scirpt of the scenes. Luckily this site has no messing with food like PublicDisgrace does
-Probably not updating anymore now that they launched HardcoreGangbang as combined subscription. Or "re launched" this site as the blog explains. Anyway, even less bondage in sight as Princess Donna wants the site to focus on "bound by hands of men" stuff
-Pricey and also one of the Kink sites with not that much scenes. Wait for a discount as always
Bottom Line: I think this one's my last Kink.com site review for a while as I don't see myself subscribing to others anytime soon and I feel like something else next. This is a site that features, exactly as the name suggests, scenes with many men and fewer girls, usually one, having sex with some bondage tossed in. Generally the action is sexually very hard with anal and dp in nearly every scene while the bondage part is not in the lead role. Often the bondage is completely forgotten at some point of the scene and I can see how it might get in the way of all the ganging and banging.

As usual the models are interviewed both before and after the scene. I guess this was originally intended to clearly indicate that all the action was voluntary but now it seems more like a feature. Anyway, it's often nice to hear the comments on your favorite scenes. The models are well chosen ones with many big names, both Americans and Europeans. The later scenes also feature quite many younger East European and Russian models often seen on European sites like 21Sextury and DDF.

So far (and now it's final) there's only roughly 70 scenes but they are long and as varied as you can get with this theme with positively high number of models so the boredom doesn't settle in too soon. As with all sites at Kink, this site also has scenes called "features" which on other sites are usually more scripted in some fantasy setting but as all scenes here seem to have some setting (prison, locker room etc.), I'm not quite sure how they differ from regular updates. Sometimes the acting is little too much as I'm not really into fake rape stuff with faked looks of suffering on faces.

All general Kink-site comments from my other reviews apply here too. The sites are basically identical, share a very active forum community and work well unless you want a colorfull and flashy esperience. Download speeds are high enough to max out a 100M connection so no complaints there either. Generally the whole Kink.com seems to me the most respectful adult entertainment company that others should look at as an example.

Note: At the time I was writing this but before I finished my review, this site was sort of discountinued or relaunched as HardcoreGangbang with same kind of content with less bondage.

12-22-12  04:59am

Replies (0)
Review
9
Visit Men In Pain

Men In Pain
(1)

82.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -It's a freebie you get when subscribing to DivineBitches. Or vice versa. If you can think anything really is free...
-A good 400 scenes or so is quite impressive backlog on this network
-Most scenes available in very nice 720p mp4
-Quite wide variety of talent, both female and male. Some big star female actresses while the guys are mostly ordinary looking men, not the stereotypes you see too often on femdom sites
-As the name says, stuff here looks often quite painful. If that works for you, then you'll be happy. Personally it's a bit of a con for me
Cons: -Not updating anymore. They hace removed release dates from the old scenes but you can see from the comments when they were originally relesed. The old scenes are then recycled to the top.
-The excessive pegging is present here too
-Sometimes these scenes get maybe too intense to some tastes. Personally all the bloody marks, cock torture and stomping makes me feel little sick
-Even less real male to female sex than on DivineBitches
Bottom Line: I'm not 100% sure how it was when DivineBitches started and MenInPain stopped updating but I'd guess the former simply took the place of the latter with MiP added as a bonus to the DB subscribers. The reason for this is beyond me as the sites share quite a lot even if the genral feeling of DB now is a bit different from MiP then. My rough feeling would be that this site had more pain and torture and way less fucking (I mean man fucking woman here) going on.

Personally I find the material here a bit too much for my likings as it's even further away from my elusive femdom ideal of men being bound and "forced" to have sex with dominating ladies with maybe some SM on the side. There is too much strapon but that was maybe one of the selling points of the site. Also I must skip videos when there's too many and too tight ropes bound to some poor fellows cock with a bucket load of weights and stuff hanging from it. Ouch. What I cannot find here (and think it's good) is the forced feminization, cuckold and forced gay stuff. Besides that, bondage, whipping, face sitting, some fetish wear and such are the things to expect.

I guess the women are mostly American models with some of the same names as you can find on other Kink.com sites. Aiden Starr, Maitresse Madeleine, Sandra Romain and few other dominating porn stars appear a lot with a wide selection of others, some well known. The guys are bit more average and with more variaition than on DivineBitches but some stereotypical "twinks" appear every now and then. It never gets too acted looking so the feeling and the credibility is there. I guess production and enthusiasm is the Kink.com's strong side, some of the stuff here would be hard to act if the models weren't really into it.

I've commented on Kink.com's technical side many times and the sites are identical in that sense so there is not much new to tell. It's fast, it's clean, no dirty tricks like pre checked sales or regional pricing. The prices might feel high but the reductions come often if you just hang on their mailing list. Videos are very nice but not FullHD, the photography is in side role. The preview mode on the whole network is very comprehensive and gives you very good idea what to expect when subscribing to each site so I recommend one takes his time to get to know the sites.

All in all it's another mixed bag. While on some scenes I hardly find anything watchable, the best of them are seriously hot. Maybe it helps that I'm not easily offended by the stuff that doesn't turn me on. If one is strongly turned off by anything male ass, then they should definitely avoid this site. Far from ideal site for me but it's all executed so well that little issues can be forgotten.

12-07-12  04:54am

Replies (1)
Review
10
Visit Public Disgrace

Public Disgrace
(2)

93.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -High Kink.com production values and dedication
-Well over 200 scenes to date with weekly update
-A wide selection of female talent, likely partly due to split production between San Francisco and Eastern Europe
-Hardcore enough. Bondage does not always come with sex, here it does
-Creative scenes and setups. Various kinds of bondage, abuse etc.
-Technically well working site with high server speeds
-Easy to manage your subscriptions and hassle free cancels
Cons: -No 1080p here either. Or high quality photography
-Relatively pricey, it's just one site for the price of many a network. Wait for a discount
-Outdoors scenes are not credible really (how could they be?) which might distract you
-Disgracing stuff itself might do nothing for many. It's not sex nor you getting disgraced so you have to get your kicks from somebody else being disgraced, often not too credibly
-Might be too much for some. There are "failed" scenes where the lady could not do it to the end
Bottom Line: Certainly one of the best sites offered by Kink.com and that's saying a lot. The site has been going from mid 2008 without interruptions and updates weekly with content that is a mix of BDSM and public sex. While it all seems to have started as outdoors sex in different East European cities, eventually they also started adding less public US indoors scenes, often shot in their San Francisco Armory building to what I'm made to believe is an audience of the subscribers. Well, that would at least explain some of the rather high prices of these sites, subsidizing some SM parties half the world away ;)

Outdoors scenes include a lot of walking around in public in light bondage, random sexual acts in semi hidden spots and eventually more sex in better hidden place, a bar or a supposedly public bus or something like that. Reactions of public vary from quite credible staring and laughing to actually participating which is a bit too much to swallow. Also no accidental under age people, police or such are ever spotted in these scenes leading me to believe in carefully planned routes and audiences. The US scenes are more hardcore in nature with heavier bondage, SM and group of people humiliating, whipping etc. the female talent. Many of those scenes are made to look like parties for the members but some are shot in pubs, sex shops and other closed off locations.

Great thing about this site is that they do not really over use same models all the time. There is lots of variation and the models also come quite equally from Europe and US and not only split between the scene types. European girls have also been featured in US shoots.

If you can live with all the make believe and do not easily feel awkward when the girls are made to walk around naked in public, this is really great site to join at least once. The price of nearly 30$ without discount can be a bit too steep with only one weekly update to join more frequently but at the moment there is enough backlog to make most feel happy. Technical side works exactly like on other Kink.com sites, no real issues there unless you want your sites looking flashy.

12-04-12  04:07am

Replies (1)
Review
11
Visit Divine Bitches

Divine Bitches
(2)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Quite unique content from a rare niche
-Access to MenInPain site for same price. Though it's no longer updating, there's a lot of stuff for new members
-Almost 200 scenes with a weekly update
-Very high production values. If you know Kink.com, you know what to expect
-Nice setups, fetish clothing, props and all the dungeon equipment
-Maitresse Madeleine (too bad she never goes into actual sex), Lorelei Lee and Aiden Starr are all great and often featured!
-HD video at 720p from the very beginning wmv or mp4
Cons: -Comparatively pricey. Other networks give yo ua newtwork membership with a dozen weekly updates for one you get here. Production values on Kink are top notch however
-Way too much strapon for my tastes
-Male models are obviously of the anything goes kind. Wimpy or bald hairy type
-I know it's not the main focus of this site but I really would like to see actual sex in every scene. Denial or teasing is just frustrating and I'm not sure if it's supposed to frustrate viewers too
-Still no 1080p and the photography is not that great. It's clearly a video site however so I can live with that
-Forced gay and cuckold stuff might be a serious turn off for some. Me, I just don't really care either way and skip that
Bottom Line: I don't really get this whole femdom thing. What I'd like to see would be stuff like SexAndSubmission or BoundGangbangs with female side as the dominating one. I guess little SM stuff always goes with porn like this but the idea would be that there is actual sex involved too. It seems that most sites however seem to focus on sissy men (or the hairy bear types) fucked with strapons, dressed as little girls or forced to suck each other, and all to often not getting to any real f/m sex at all. This site is a borderline case with little of the good and some of the bad.

Generally these scenes feature any number of men and women with men humiliated in different ways, some SM themes ranging from mild to quite painfull looking ones, strap on sex and either tease/denial or the ladies actually having sex with their often bound partners. Sometimes there's also forced gay content but not that often. The female talent is very high class, this site features some of my favorites I mentioned above regularly even if some of them seem to not actually ever have sex with males. The guys on the other hand are not your regular studs you see in more generic stuff but seem to often be either stereoptypical wimps or the hairy types. I guess there isn't too much talent willing to do these scenes so they get reused a lot and you see same guys in many scenes.

The setups are great with lots of effort put into the gear and clothing like Kink.com always seems to do. Nothing half assed here in terms of sticking to the niche either, it is quite credible. Scenes are long with kind of split into multiple different parts.

Technically everything still works great. The site is a bit plaing but everything functions and the servers are very fast. 11-12 megabytes per second is where my connection maxed out on this site. If you are really a photography freak, this site isn't necessarily for you. The photos are there but they are nothing special in terms of quality.

Like all the sites at Kink.com, this one too must be individually subscribed to with the exception that MenInPain is included. It's got quite similar themed content but is no longer updating. Like with other sites, you can stay as a Kink member and just wait for a good price offer, they come regularly.

I recommend this site with some reservations. There's a lot of stuff that is certain to put many potential viewers off and for example, strapon stuff is basically in every scene. However, I cannot think of any site that is closer to what I'm looking for. It seems that femdom just doesn't come in vanilla, so to say. There's always certain things included.

12-03-12  04:52am

Replies (3)
Review
12
Visit Everything Butt

Everything Butt
(1)

94.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Close to 200 scenes with weekly updates
-Very good 720p in mp4. Also available in smaller and more pakced formats. I only wish they had 1080p
-For a kink.com site this one has quite high production standards when it comes to make up and clothing on ladies. No morning faces for the sake of plotline, latex and other fetish wear is also regularly used
-Scenes are almost like two in one. First girl on girl anal play in fetish wear and then a guy on girl/girls hardcore sex
-Wide selection of shooting locations inside their Armory, toys, tools etc. These guys have the hardware it takes to run a site like this
-Techically works well, very good download speeds, fair and honest business without the dirty tricks you get used to with this industry. Good forums with active community
-More girls than guys in non lesbian scenes too
Cons: -Rather pricey like the Kink sites tend to be unless you wait for a special offer on their email list or get one from some other site
-When the guys enter, the scenes tend to lose the fetish focus and it all too often becomes "just another anal site" which is exactly what they claim not to be
-There is a stark change in the type of material they publish in early 2010 which is roughly halfway through the scenes so far so one may like some of their stuff while get nothing from the other half
-The site is quite bland with no good search available
-Photos are quite mediocre
Bottom Line: Everything Butt is a site which as it's name suggests, focuses on butts or more accurately buttholes. Well, even more accurately, stuffing things in them. The site features currently roughly 200 scenes which are mostly long and multi parted so the amount of content is not a prolem.

A typical scene lately starts with a short interview and then the action begins as girl/girl anal play, usually featuring latex or other fetish wear or some fantasy role play setting. This is all done well although the extremity of some scenes might not be for everyone. After the girl/girl action the scene usually cuts to where a guy enters and sadly all the fetish wear has usually somehow disappeared. The rest is more or less regular extreme anal sex, not too much different from what sites like Evil Angel offer. The good thing about regular content is that the scenes are kind of like two in one and there is almost always more girls in action than guys.

If you go back around halfway through the production, different kind of scenes start appearing however. There is more shorter scenes with only some solo insertion or bound enema play or scenes with only girl on girl action. It appears that the butt fetish focus was at some point switched to more generic anal sex focus. All the scenes on this site are available in 720p so the oldest ones are equal in quality to the newer ones.

The girls are mostly big names here, ones who are well known in American industry and also some East Europeans. Bobbi Starr, Amber Rayne, Krissy Lynn and such are regularly featured here, probably because everyone cannot handle what they do on this site. I like the fact that they are almost always wear proper make up here unlike on SexAndSubmission for example. As I metioned earlier, the latex is also a nice thing but sadly usually disappears when the guy enters.

The site as all kink.com sites can be considered somewhat pricey unless one finds a special offer on the kink.com itself or somewhere else. There is no network membership and buying single scenes with their on site currency is ridiculously expensive. The site works well enough even if it is quite simple and without very good search functions. Download speeds are great and if you forget about photos, the quality of content is too.

Despite the small issues, this site goes with my highest recommendations if the content suits your tastes.

07-12-12  12:36am

Replies (2)
Review
13
Visit Sex And Submission

Sex And Submission
(1)

92.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Close to 400 scenes with video and photoset all the way from 2005 to this day
-Weekly update with a long scene
-720p HD from 2006 already. Most of the scenes are 720p
-These guys are the pioneers of sex in bondage kind of material. There is lots of variation and little bit for everyone as long as you like the subject
-Active community on site with forums and commenting
-Well known models as well as total amateurs
-Good download speeds, works well with DL manager, no timeout on login that I've noticed. Technical side works
-Kink.com membership is not tied to any subscription. You can stay and subscribe what and when you feel like it waiting for possible special price offers
Cons: -Site could use some work. No relevant search or any kind of tagging to find scenes, instead of preview page you are thrown into streaming video when you click on a scene etc.
-Strongly subjective but I prefer European models which this site doesn't feature that often. I'd also prefer even more hardware and less ropes
-Acting too much (I guess it is acting). Screaming, shouting, stupid dirty talk about masters, asking for permission to cum, rolling eyes and making faces etc.
-Relatively pricey unless you wait for a discount either on Kink.com or on some other site
-Not really for photography freaks. Pictures look like non flash pics taken during action or even screenshots
-No 1080p although 720p in mp4 is very good
Bottom Line: Without any doubt, this is the most significant sex in bondage site around with strong take on topic and no filler scenes in between. You can see the whole history of them tiptoeing around US legislation in 2005 and quite quickly starting to produce full action in bondage instead of the "catch and release" stuff they were probably forced to do for first few dozen scenes. There is probably no need telling that the site is part of the Kink.com which offers various sites in different fetish themes. However all sites must be individual subscribed to and there is no kind of network pass, only other option being buying overpriced on site currency one can use to unlock scenes.

The content of this site is simply put sex in bondage with various forms of light to semi hard SM with whips, electric prods and such, acting and role play included. There is always at least some kind of master/slave set up in place but occassionally the plots are more elaborate with scifi, medical or some other acting with props and all. The acting is the general porn quality and luckily the focus is still on the action. Sometimes I wish there was a little less of the "Yes master!" shouting as I find it awkward. These people have probably the best shooting locations and hardware for this kind of stuff available in their San Francisco Armory. Personally I think it's still a bit too rope heavy but of course they have a separate site for even more hardware bondage.

Models are the quality factor that varies a lot on this site and it too is of course all subjective. Many of them are American or big name international stars. The most glaring lack is my favorite group, East Europeans. The models aren't all that young or fit and some of them are total amateurs too which is actually cool. The strong American presence leads to lots of awkward dirty talking, shouting and screaming which I personally find a bit too much. There is one particularly frightening case called Chloe Camilla. She looks cute in photos and before the action starts but then it turns into one huge epileptic fit where she makes scary noises and rolls her eyes. Impossible to look for prolonged times.

Video quality is very good, especially if one is willing to download 720p mp4 which can end up in huge files way over three gigabytes. 1080p is a glaring omission by todays standards but I'm not sure if there'd be much to gain with it compared to already very good 720p. The only complaint is that most of the scenes are shot in quite dark conditions although lighting is good. Photo sets are available for every scene but they aren't anywhere near the offerings of sites with more focus on photography and appear to be non flash snapshots taken while filming the scene.

Technically the site itself leaves me little cold. Searching is not happening, there are no tagging on the scenes and the overall appearance is (probably intentionally) dark and minimalistic. The scene links lead directly to streaming scene so be aware of your speaker level. Personally I think they should change it to take user to the site preview.

This site is quite slow updater by today's standards. One scene per week is all you get so prolonged membership might end up not being the most attractive choice. However almost 400 past scenes is certainly a lot and probably takes up to one terabyte of HD space if downloaded at the best 720p mp4 quality so there is a lot for your money. Also once you have made a Kink.com account, you can watch for special offers to join varying sites while leaving others behind. Still I wish they had some system in place where you'd gain credits while subscribing to any of theire sites that you'd be able to buy occassional scene from another one.

05-14-12  02:54am

Replies (0)
Review
14
Visit Massage Creep

Massage Creep
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Updating more or less regularly like all the main attractions at Porn Pros Network with 96 current scenes
-Scenes and girls are both really hot in very erotic but still hardcore way, especially the new Passion HD style ones
-Unique topic like most sites here have although I've noticed that there are others in massage niche too
-Relatively good quality of video. The oldest scenes are from late 2009 and already 720p
-Oil in many scenes. The only thing that really makes massage genre in my opinion
-Working POV content
-As spouse/girlfriend friendly as it gets. Although she might end up wanting a massage instead of what you were suggesting ;)
Cons: -In some scenes warmup/massage might take a bit too long for ones tastes. There are however other sites on this network for more immediate action
-General Porn Pros cons apply here too. No really relevant search engine, browsing is the way to find scenes. No indication of video resolution next to download buttons. 1080p missing. Mediocre photography. No big deals though
-If you were looking for anal, this is about last site to find it on this network. I've spotted one scene which is a very hot one with Anissa Kate, by the way
-Some unneeded editing in newer scenes where clothes or towels just "disappear"
Bottom Line: This site like most of the others on Porn Pros Network falls into a very specific niche which here is massage. Specifically guys massaging girls with oil in situations that start out usually as rather innocent (if naked) massage with the guys hands slowly creeping (I guess hence the name) into more and more private parts and eventual sex. Sometimes the massage takes longer, sometimes the girls is supposedly so horny that the sex starts quite soon and sometimes there's even kissing/fondling before the massage part. There's also the odd scene with the male actor receiving the massage.

They've got a very nice selection of models on these 96 scenes with little or no repetition so every scene offers something fresh (if not in theme). Models are young and hot and while this site has no teen theme, there are no wannabe MILF's here eihter.

I cannot really comment well on the credibility of the scenes on this site if someone is particularly into the supposed reality aspect of what's going on. Being no real fan of body massage, I have no idea if the guys are doing the real thing. However it looks hot, there is lots of oil involved and that's all I need to enjoy from this site.

As I've mentioned on my reviews of Porn Pros Network and Disgraced18, the whole network is now updating with scenes from their site that one has to subsribe to separately, Passion HD, and this is where those scenes really shine. On many sites they have a feeling of being bit out of place since the action is nowhere near as goofy or strange as one might be used to on those sites. Here however they are the best of the whole bunch. Better lit, girls looking better, every bit of action is very faithful to the site's niche with added touch of class. There's roughly 10 of those newer scenes at the moment but I certainly hope to see more.

Technically there's not much to be said that I already didn't give overview when reviewing Porn Pros Network. All works acceptably even if the site design and search function could use little work.

I can imagine this is one of the main reasons to join this network for those who are not into the trademark stuff of colorful bondage and joke sites. Luckily this one seems to get even better. Normally I'm into bit rougher stuff but this is so well excecuted that I cannot help returning to these scenes.

04-13-12  06:30am

Replies (2)
Review
15
Visit Disgraced 18

Disgraced 18
(0)

88.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -120 scenes with more or less frequent updates every week or every two weeks
-New updates include very classy stuff from the Passion HD style of production. Nice ladies in white bright light and clothes
-Really unique stuff. Wacky bondage with bright colored tape, ropes, ball gags, toys and other stuff. Luckily they haven't decided to use too much childish props either. Creative use of all kinds of stuff in bondage from shopping carts to garden chairs
-A good selection of hot young models without using the same ones over and over. International big names but also ones I've never heard of
-Almost all the videos are in quite nice quality, close to 720p in MPG format
-Good download speeds, fast working web site
Cons: -New updates include very classy stuff from the Passion HD style of production. If you were a fan of their former very unique content, this material in shades of white with bondage limited to handcuffs may not really be what you wanted
-Only a scene or two with anal action
-Occassionally the goofiness just goes a little too far. A girl with a bunch of sausages taped into her mouth? A girl covered with spray serpentine?
-Bondage is sometimes really half assed with the girl almost holding up the stuff that is supposedly holding her
-Video quality can get pixelated at times even in a clip that looks good most of the time
Bottom Line: One of the more active sites on Porn Pros Network and for me one of their main attractions. Yet another part of the network that probably divides opinions strongly so all the ratings are quite subjective I guess.

The topic is sex in bondage with teen niche added on top of it and the whole thing is given a strange twist that results in quite wacky brightly colored combination of (probably) unintended humor and hot sex. Basic recipe is a girl getting interviewed and then bound with ropes, bars, gags, colorful ropes, tape and so on and had sex with. Often there is additional colorful stuff mixed in like spray serpentine, laundry pins etc. for often quite messy results. Lot of action with toys also, ranging from dildoes to nipple clamps and different kinds of pumps.

With only a handful of exceptions, the scenes are one on one and the sex the regular vaginal variant. Irritatingly there are also some helping hands (not to mention the camera mans hands on the girl) visible on the background at the times with little or no editing done to remove those. The bondage is quite light in contrast to sites like ones offered by Kink.com and often it actually appears that the girls are struggling to support the stuff they are bound to. Personally I like it the other way but it's excuseable on the site that isn't apparently taking itself too seriously.

Technical side of the things is exactly like on any other site on Porn Pros Network. Like on many networks these days, the sites are just another category filter inside a unified website. Searching and filtering content inside this site alone makes not much sense since browsing through 120 scenes is quite quickly done so the search functions do not really matter within a sub site. Video is available mostly in HD that is close to or exactly 720p. 1080p advertised on the site header is apparently somewhere else and not here. The formats are offered without info about quality so it's a bit of a hit or miss until you find out what you like. For me it's MPG but some say WMV is less pixelated. Photos aren't really a focus of this site and I quickly forgot about them.

The network also offers two other quite similar sites which I don't really see point in giving a separate reviews. Squirt Disgrace could be probably combined with this site without too many noticing, having only 15 scenes and last updating 2009. The content is basically the same kind with the difference that the girls squirt during the scenes. MILF Humiliation has 42 scenes of similar action with slightly older ladies and hasn't seen new additions since 2010. The scenes are somewhat harder with anal sex included every now and then and not quite that much bright colors but the general messing around with household items and gardening tools is there. All fun sites if you can enjoy this kind of stuff.

Bondage with sex isn't still very well presented in pay site scene and I don't really know why. Many old big names are still pushing material for DVD releases and I wonder if they really can sell them. These sites offer a one take on the topic and while it's probably nothing for real hard core enthuaiasts, I say they certainly help fill the gap and I'm happy that they are putting out their own unique take on this niche.

Your mileage may vary, as they say. If the subject does not interest you and the wackiness puts you off, this site may totally suck in your opinion. If you are not that serious about little messing around and find bondage and models hot, it's a rare gem.

04-09-12  07:33am

Replies (0)
Review
16
Visit Porn Pros Network

Porn Pros Network
(0)

91.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Large number of subsites with various niches and themes that are hard to find elsewhere
-These guys understand that most of the guys want to see more girls than other guys. The scenes are often packed with both genders but usually there seems to be more girls around
-Quite nice image quality in most of the videos. Especially the new Passion HD content is very nice. Up to roughly 720p in MPEG and WMV
-Large archive of scenes for quite decent price
-Models are almost always really hot on their major sites
-MassageCreep, Disgraced18, MilfHumiliation, TeenBFF, CrueltyParty and even CumshotSurprise and CumDisgrace are innovative and cool sites with uique content. Sometimes too unique ;)
-Technically works well, good download speeds with DL manager running up to four simultaneous downloads at 10+ megabytes per second
Cons: -Site navigation is quite awkward. Search doesn't really help and tag words are way too common and often mistaken. What good is tag "Ass" that 99% of scenes have?
-Not much for fans of photography. What they call high quality image sets are to me like low res screen caps
-Video options are unclear. You can usually choose MPEG, MP4 or WMV but there is no indication what resolution they are. Generally it appears that MP4 is the smallest one in image size and MPEG and WMV are the same while 1080p promised on the site is missing altogether
-Some kind of regional pricing. You get the actual price when you are to give the cc info, until that you are shown the USD price that is lower. I made a mental note to always check these things to the very end with a fake email address
-Some joke sites with plastic fake cocks and bucket loads of fake cum are quite ridiculous
-Scenes could use better preview images
-Relatively few anal scenes
Bottom Line: Well, this one is a mixed bag for sure. It has everything from boyfriend/girlfriend like gentle scenes to not-quite-milfs being bound to household appliances with colorful paper serpentine to ridiculously huge plastic dongs spraying fake cum all over groups of oiled ladies. Something for everyone I'd say as long as you are not looking for strictly girl/girl scenes or solo content. The production varies from overly goofy and ridiculous to the very smooth low sunlight lit scenes in different shades of white clothing and props.

Examples of the goofy side are Disgraced18 which stages younger ladies in scenes where they are loosely bound in ropes and cuffs in all the shades of rainbow and had sex with. MilfHumiliation which is almost like the aforementioned but the ladies vary from what I guess are teen mothers to older cougars. CockCompetition is a kind of a wheel of fortune game show where a guy with diamond studded teeth fucks competitors with half a meter long plastic dong. CumDisgrace is bondage gang banging with fake cum and a strange looking muscular guy wanking off on the background. CumshotSurprise is quite regular group sex with fake cumshots in the beginning and end.

On the classier side they have sites like MassageCreep which features massage scenes turned eventually into sex. TeenBFF has scenes which start out as lesbian action with a "boyfriend" joining in later. CrueltyParty is supposedly group of firls dominating one guy, a male stripper or whatever but with the exception of first few scenes is quite tame. 18YearsOld is quite regular one on one action.

In addition to the regular content of their sites, they have also added scenes from site Passion HD. Those are more X-Art kind of scenes with soft focus, low light, white clothes and slightly dreamy overall feeling. These scenes are very high quality in my opinion, feature hot ladies and are a nice distraction from general content on the site. The only problem is that they do not always quite match the theme of the sub site where they are placed. For example they don't have much disgracing when placed on Disgraced18 and on the CrueltyParty they lack the femdom theme.

Everyone doesn't necessarily agree with me but I could use more anal action on this whole network. There are many models on these scenes who are almost known for their performance on that aspect so let's have it all! Other minor nitpickings include photographers and other crew seen in background and corners of picture on sites like CrueltyParty etc. Nothing too bad production wise as long as one likes the theme of the content.

Technical side is a bit mixed case as well. Video is quite good when it is good but older scenes and indoor ones can be quite grainy and pixelated. Photo sets are just a side thought in my opinion, this is clearly a video site. Downloads work fast and videos are easy to dl once you figure out which version you want and find the scenes you like. The only effective way I found is to manually browse the site based on subsites and video download options have no indication of resolution. The 1080p promised on the header of the site seems to be missing.

The site updates roughly once a day with new material or remastered old scenes. While this is slightly slower than some of the most active sites, the rate is still perfectly acceptable.

As a bottom line, this site is certainly worth a subscription every now and then, especialy now that the new Passion HD content is being added. Backlog is decent, not huge like on some sites so it may not entertain for prolonged periods but is certainly worth going through. Somewhat clearer site design with better search and tagging might help as well as the advertised 1080p although the resolution itself doesn't always add to anything but file size.

04-06-12  03:50am

Replies (6)
Review
17
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
(6)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Super high quality photography. Probably the best I've seen on network level, only beaten by some artsy sites that offer much less otherwise
-1080p H.264 video is flawless if slightly too large in file size
-Very good looking models with some that you don't find so often on other major Euro sites
-Backlog of nearly 10000 scenes
-Sites are very true to their niche. Nothing feels watered down, girls on DDFBusty are busty, HotLegsAndFeet has strong leg/feet focus, HouseOfTaboo is always kinky etc.
-Technical side is good. Quite fast downloads (7 megs per second on dl manager), multiple options for viewing photos, zipped photosets and so on
Cons: -Recycling. By far my biggest gripe on this site. Basically there is nothing wrong in giving old great scenes a spotlight but the way it's done is outright cheap. The old scenes are sneakily removed, then re-relased some time later as part of the advertised update schedule. Sometimes the preview images even get a 1080p stamp no matter what the truth is
-Slightly slowish rate of truely new scenes, especially those with hardcore content
-Split releases of new scenes in some cases, HouseOfTaboo especially
-Regional pricing. It's not a straight euro/dollar sign change but not fully equal one either
-Quite expensive compared to main competition with pricing and update structure that does not encourage prolonged membership
Bottom Line: DDFNetwork is probably quite well known to many being one of the largest and longest running Euro sites with a reputation of high quality and beautiful models. Today the network consists of 13 separate sites, some of which are more active, some just archives of old scenes. The sites are:

1ByDay: The largest site where the network apparently originated. Over 4000 scenes focusing on solo and nude scenes. Older ones have hardcore too
HotLegsAndFeet: Over 2000 scenes of foot and leg fetish
SandysFantasies: An archive of old scenes of Sandy and others
OnlyBlowJob: Focuses on oral sex, both ways. Older scenes are often clipped from full scenes but new ones seems made for the purpose
HandsOnHardcore: Male/female hardcore in varying numbers of participants. Updates little too slowly and with many recycled scenes
DDFBusty: Big tits in solo and hardcore action. Pleasantly serious about the size of them tits
HouseOfTaboo: Personal favorite. Creative and inspired selection of various fetishes. Top quality but some niches may leave you cold
CherryJul: Selection of old Cherry Jul scenes. Solo, lesbian and male/female. Very nice but obviously older content
EuroGirlsOnGirls: Lesbian site leaning towards the teeny category
EuroTeenErotica: Younger ladies in solo, lesbian and male/female scenes. Sometimes with awkward props and clothing
EveAngelOfficial: Eve Angel in various setups. Alone and with other girls
SexVideoCasting: Casting type action, solo and male/female. I think the low quality is part of the genre
HairyTwatter: Hairier side of the entertainment. Nothing ridiculous but still not my kind of porn

All these sites are very high in quality of photography with the exception of the casting site. Videos look very good in high definition 720p and 1080p when available while the older content obviously looks slightly aged. This network has always had the top selection of models available and production and photography/video shooting is very professional. Personally I'm more into photos and these guys arguably have the best photography of all the big sites. While the image size has not changed over the last years and some sites have overtaken in this matter, the 2000pix wide is still more than most can see on their screens.

The backlog is huge with nearly 10000 separate scenes. The numbers are however a bit misleading as in the past when the sites were separate the scenes used to be released on all individual sites if the content matched their niche. One can easily notice this by making a category search that returns same scene multiple times in a row.

Where this network does not always shine is the number of all new updates. Especially if one is into hardcore, he might really spend weeks waiting for anything suiting his fancy. The only site updating with guaranteed hardcore scenes is HandsOnHardcore and unfortunately they have one of the least frequent update schedules with old recycled scenes often re-released.

I give the score of 90 as an average of what it would be to different kinds of users. If you are new to this site, I'd call this very highly recommendable up to score of 95. There is so much to view and download in the archive of this network that one month probably is not long enough membership for one to lose taste even with heavy use and wide bandwidth. For prolonged memberships however it is not my choice of site. Surely I join again and again but sometimes whole weeks may go by without nothing really cathing your attention and you feel like you are wasting quite expensive membership. One of the best sites at what it does, I only wish it did more of it.

02-05-12  05:31am

Replies (1)
Review
18
Visit House Of Taboo

House Of Taboo
(1)

95.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Exceptionally high quality of production
-These guys have lots of ideas, good selection of props and shooting locations and apparently a large wardrobe
-Unlike most sites on DDF Network, this one is still updating almost entirely with all new, non recycled content
-Hot European models with good variety
-Frequent updates, many times a week
-Close to 650 existing scenes at the moment
-Wide variety of fetishes without too much softcore
Cons: -Complete scenes are divided into up to four separate updates, some of which may contain some part totally uninteresting to one. For example pt1. spanking, pt2. toys, pt3. sex.
-Wide variety of fetishes unfortunately means you usually are not into some of them resulting in wasted updates
-The same few aging guys that apparently are 95% of euro porn male work force
-1080p in mp4 would be nice although wmv is good
-Image size starts feeling bit outdated at 2000 pixel wide
-Not the fastest downloads around, 5-7 megs a second is not bad though. Site can be a bit sluggish too at times
-Occassionally excessive file size. Almost one gigabyte per 10 minutes is too much. I've seen sharper reuslts with half the ratio using H.264
Bottom Line: DDF Network currently has 13 different sub sites, each updating with different frequency and more or less new material. In my opinion House of Taboo is clearly the best site in the network when it comes to the quality, the originality and the freshness of material. House of Taboo features a variety of fetishes from spanking to pissing to bondage, latex and medical play. The best thing is that the site is quite hardcore too which cannot be taken for granted as sadly fetish often means softcore in the world of adult sites.

The counter side to the variety is of course the negative point that you only get so much of stuff that does anything to you if you are only into say spanking. Even though the site updates thrice a week, the number is in truth quite inflated since a single scene can be split into spanking section, toys section, sex section and pissing section, each posted separately. I for example only care about the middle two so half of one scenes updates can go by me. It's good to notice that the scenes on this site are almost entirely fresh ones and not recycled old ones.

The quality is great in terms of production, technical details, inspiration and models. Photography is the best I've seen although they could add higher resolution sets since many already own monitors with higher resoltion than their max 2000 pixel wide images. Videos are right on the top although there is a minor nitpick too: They are quite huge in file size. If you ask me, 21Sextury has slight edge in crisp image and colors but their H.264 files are significantly smaller. House of Taboo has a nice variety of (female) models with different style and looks with handfull I've not seen before in other networks (Linet, Tigerr Benson for example). Scenes have great variety and the same props are not over used. The settings differ between differnt houses, outdoors and so on, not too many shady basements unlike on many other bondage sites.

For me this is a site that nearly alone justifies the subscription to DDF Network. Only thing I could wish for was more updates, especially of bondage sex variety but that's always the case with me I guess. My cons are mostly minor nitpickings, I consider this site one of the best ones I've seen so far. I need to rise my old score few points as the quality has gotten better in these one and half years and the site still delivers.

01-02-12  10:09am

Replies (2)
Review
19
Visit 21Sextury.com

21Sextury.com
(9)

95.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -HUGE archive of old content. Over 12000 scenes and rising. A good deal of those are in 1080p or 720p HD resolution.
-In the Sextury/Sextreme split this site arguably got a way better selection of sites
-Confusing membership system with loyalty bonus sites is gone
-Dirt cheap after few months membership without regional billing nonsense
-The best looking female models I could find anywhere. Every major Euro star seems to be featured
-Great attitude towards loyal members
-Excellent quality of production all over. Photosets with large or huge photos (up to 21MP), 1080p video with reasonable file size
-Good looking, clean site with only some ads disturbing me
-Webmaster participates on PU
-No dirty tricks that you see elsewhere. No pre checked sales tricks, no DRM, no witholding downloads until a certain date, no limits and DL managers work perfectly
Cons: -DominatedGirls was removed from the package and generally you get less premium sites than before
-Scenes with multiple girls with men are relatively scarce
-New sites come and go inflating the numbers of what you are promised
-Same few guys in most scenes. Remember, not only men view these!
-Some sites dedicated to old models that upgrade frequently with inferior content
-In site ads on the members section
-The nagging feeling that the scenes used to be better in terms of ideas and general feel in the time when the production quality wasn't that high. I cannot quite put my finger on it but when viewing scenes from 2007 or so I cannot help wishing THOSE were in HD
Bottom Line: A re-review of my favorite site so far. Quite a lot has changed since I first joined but generally the direction has been right. The site looks all different, has been split, new sites have come and gone and so on. However for an old subscriber it's all been for good since they admirably honored us and instead of having to choose a half site, we got the whole thing with the same price. Of course the new memberships would give access to the bonus site package which isn't a big deal to me. The split itself was a bit strange deal as I got the feeling that Sextury side got all the best sites while Sextreme got a mixed bag of fetishy sites with no common theme. For me the choice of these two new networks would be easily Sextury but I'd be missing DominatedGirls and to the lesser amount TeachMeFisting and Zoliboy.

The strong sites that I consider main parts of this network are ClubSandy, PixAndVideo, AssholeFever, DPFanatics and AnalTeenAngels. All five are going strongly with new scenes released at least weekly with some of them getting more. The quality is high and production wise has only gotten better. Some lack of inspiration is clear at the times but this is generally quite mainstream site. ClubSandy and PixAndVideo suffer somewhat from excessive solo, girls only stuff and the quite average scenes of the old stars who used to do much more than they do these days. Some ladies should get a mainstream job if they don't want to do porn anymore. Bonus sites are a large deal of the sites but their quality is uneven and varies. Basically you get outsourced scenes with a bit different regional emphasis at DVD quality as the best choice.

Technically the site works flawlessly. I find searching very easy with the extensive category filters, model listings and the subsite structure. I haven't experienced any technical issues of past with the files corrupting or such. Download speeds are great with at least 12MB/s with DL manager. There is a large selection of video sizes, clips and few formats on top of that (wmv and H.264). Photos are as large as I've seen on any site and over. They are available in zips with two different image sizes to choose from. Usually there is more than enough of photos of each scene starting from slightly below hundred and up to two hundred or more on premium sites.

I cannot 100% verify this but I've understood that the old confusing membership loyalty system where some sites can be accessed only after a month or two of membership is gone. Now you should get what you sign for instantly. The pricing structure is attractive eventually reducing to 9.95$ a month that is hard to break away from knowing you have to pay higher price for many months if you decide to join again. In my opinion this is a win-win situation.

Being my favorite site and still giving it a high 95 rating I think I should focus on what would it take to bring the rating even higher. In my opinion there are two big issues in content that generally bug me. One is the strong focus on scenes where there are at least as many men in scenes as women. They should really look at sites like EvilAngel who seem to have grasped the fact that usually men want to see women more than men. When 21Sextury puts many women in a scene, they often leave men out. Another thing that I've noticed is that they use a handful of guys on their scenes. Not only men are seeing these scenes and it's actually quite boring to see the same aging men there every time when you are not into grandpas fuck teens fetish. The Russian focused sites have younger men in senes but the same faces everytime problem is even worse there.

Near perfect site anyway as despite the minor nitpickings the huge amount of content keeps the boredom away! A site that everone should at least check out if European mainstream is the genre you are into. Now even more so as the fetishy themes got shifted to the 21Sextreme.

11-03-11  05:30am

Replies (5)
Review
20
Visit Evil Angel

Evil Angel
(4)

92.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Large selection of the hardest mainstream hardcore DVD's there is from a good variety of some of the best known directors in the business
-HD updates now also available for download, on some scenes it's only 540p "Web HD" though
-Fast downloads with no limits. Works well with dl managers too up to four transfers at time
-Very reasonable price
-5397 scenes at the moment with multiple updates on weekdays
Cons: -Searching this site is difficult
-New HD releases come in limited numbers, most of them are standard resolution
-Slow releases of complete films. Now that you see the scene release schedule for a title, it may stretch months into the future
-Some HD releases are held for weeks before being released for downloading. If you are worried about pirates, don't punish the paying customers!
-File size for HD scenes can be huge (fix was promised), over five gigabytes
-Regional pricing. No matter what they tell, all the sites could fix this if they wanted to
-This is THE Evil Angel site and yet only a part of releases seem to end up here
Bottom Line: It's subjective of course but I think Evil Angel is one of the greatest (if not the) studios in gonzo hardcore genre at the moment releasing DVD's. This site delivers a large amount of their releases categorized by directors which there are many and they are big names too. Rocco Siffredi, John Stagliano, Cristoph Clark just to name few. The content varies quite a lot based on the director but I dare say there is something for most of tastes with the backlog of over 5000 scenes. Evil Angel doesn't appear to really be a BluRay studio with only seven titles available at their online shop but the website has started with HD content already with some 720p and 1080p clips available and also 540p versions of some of their past DVD releases.

The site itself leaves room for improvement. While you can get the basic browsing and downloading done reasonably well, the search functionality just doesn't deliver. The tagging is incomplete with scenes missing many tags and actress names (actually they often tag male actors better) and many standard tags also missing. For example fetish side isn't really tagged too well with "fetish" tag returning few hundred mixed results, "leather" returning everything from PVC to leather to latex, no tag for BDSM which there is quite a lot of and so on. For me by far the most useful tag is "HD Movies" and rest of the searching I just do by browsing the DVD covers. Zipped scene sets would have also been a nice addition since every download link for a scene is behind another page and there might be 15-20 scenes to a film. They also have photos, not very good and not zipped but as this is a DVD site, I don't consider that an issue.

The release policy appears to be roughly two HD scenes per working day plus a number of non HD or backstage scenes on top of that. Sometimes they might add even few dozen scenes but those are shortish standard resolution ones. At least at the moment there is also some download delay thing going on where the new films downloads are witheld for a time, probably due to the fears of piracy but I think they are punishing the wrong guy there. Sometimes a whole film gets pushed out reasonably quickly but for some to be fully released you have to wait months. Also it's good to note that this site doesn't release nearly everything Evil Angel releases. If it's not here, I don't know where to look for it unless you want to buy DVD's which I doubt.

The films are all hardcore so if you after that, every update counts. Some girls only films and film series are also featured but they are far from soft. Personally I like especially the European videos on this site. If they push up their release rate of HD scenes from directors like Rocco Siffredi and Cristoph Clark, then the sites like DDF Prod and 21Sextury.com have a serious competitor here and also from other DVD sites from FameDollars.

The price is very good although Europeans end up paying extra for no good reason. The cons list is longer than the pros here but the cons are mostly minor nitpickings while the pros are very solid ones. This site could easily be a 95 point one for me if they focused on the new releases in HD quality. That'd make this one a top site with ones like 21Sextury in my books. Of course it's hard to compete against big networks with a large number of subsites giving a sort of guaranteed mix of updates every week when you are releasing complete films. Here you can have a really good week when they release something you really like or few weeks of that director you really hate.

08-18-11  12:03am

Replies (2)
Review
21
Visit Tranny Smuts

Tranny Smuts
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Video up to 1080p H.264. That's the best anyone's offering at the moment
-Fast streaming with scenes split in easy to navigate pieces
-Large zipped photosets with fine pictures in sizes over 12 megapixels. Also smaller size available.
-Very good overall functionality with the whole network's integrated tag searching, excellent download speeds (I've been able to verify up to 12 megabytes per second with dl managers), no limits, DRM or anything like that
-Weekly updates with 28 scenes so far, at least four weeks ahead scheduled
-Action is mostly every possible ways and features all (three) genders
Cons: -The "ladies" often look like guys with some makeup and bad boob jobs
-The chances are that this one's another of those sites that don't make it into 100's in total number of scenes but that remains to be seen
-Condoms. Don't like them in porn, aren't the actors checked anyway?
Bottom Line: I rarely review sites with niche that I personally am not really into but since no one has written about this one yet, I might just take an as objective as possible approach and lay down the facts with few opinions.

This is one of the latest premium site addition to 21Sextreme network, premium meaning HD content and I suppose exclusivity. While they have been adding sites lately little needlessly with similar content as the existing ones and having them die a little too fast, this one arguably couldn't have been combined with anything there already was. What little they had in TS genre was bonus sites with outsourced and non exclusive material. When it comes to outsourcing, I'm guessing this site is also bought material since it's apparently not European, I'm guessing Brazil from their looks, sounds and speech. It's also somewhat out of sync with the latest scene having a christmas theme and such. That might also mean that when the current material runs out, so does this site but that's just me speculating.

This isn't really a special niche site within it's own genre but more like one where all the possible combinations are avialable. Scenes have men, women (some with strapons) and TS in different combinations and while in my personal opinion it's all too often a man in the receiving end, all the other variations are there too maybe with the exception of TS on TS. I guess one of the main points is that the "ladies" should look like girls and this is sadly where this site doesn't really deliver. It's like a twisted version of the Aerosmith song where the dude looks like lady but sadly only on some good pictures. When you browse more of them or view the video, the truth is all too clear just by looking at their faces ;)

Few points reduced for short history and if it keps up, it's worth more. Plus few points for really being a unique site within the whole network and not another site with familiar content. Also reduced some for the looks of the models. If you are into all around hardcore TS action and masculine looking models aren't an issue, you might find this worth much more than I.

08-14-11  03:04am

Replies (0)
Review
22
Visit Anal Queen Alysa

Anal Queen Alysa
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Very good quality 12 megapixel image photosets available in zips
-Video up to 1080p in multiple formats. 1080p in H.264 and wmv
-Good looking young mainly Russian models that are featured on other 21Sextury.com sites as well
-Excellent download speeds with dl managers, well working indexed search, fast site, no DRM or any such nonsense, good customer support at least via Porn Users
Cons: -New site with only little over dozen scenes available at the moment. Only 10 scenes are new material and the rest are older 21Sextury.com scenes associated with Alyssa Gap. There's five or so announced future updates listed
-Repetitive scenes. Same kind of action with the same toys, partially same girls and with the same kind of general feel
-Mostly girls on girls. There is quite much of that already in this network. The need is really for scenes with multiple girls with guys
-No real need for a new site with this kind of content. Alyssa Gap isn't exactly one of the biggest European stars and the content is quite similar to Let'sPlayLez (that has been quiet for a month) and Gapeland
Bottom Line: Yet another new site on 21Sextury.com network. For the old time subscribers with the old access covering both 21Sextury and 21Sextreme this brings the total sites number up to 50. This is one of the handful of actress specific sites but one not strictly limited to scenes featuring her. The name is Alysa Gap, I've never heard of her before but when I noticed she goes by the name Gapolexa in the very same network that is featuring her site, it rang some bells.

The action is 95% all girl sex with strapons, dildos and plugs. Also some strange fetishes like pushing balls out of ones ass (is this supposed to be simulated crapping?) are included which may or may not be good news to viewers. Scenes are shot in bedroom or living room so it's bed or sofa action with not much variation so far. Also the props used vary only little from scene to scene. After viewing the scenes available at the moment, you alredy know that red strapon quite well. Clothing varies somewhat but there is no common theme here like there is on Let'sPlayLez (stockings). Some stockings, sometimes only socks and so on.

Content reminds one strongly of another relatively new but at the moment non updating site Let'sPlayLez with the biggest difference being that this site is not strictly speaking a lesbian site but features also some men. However of the ten new scenes and the five upcoming ones, there is only one with any real intercourse. Some older scenes from other 21Sextury.com sites like AssholeFever and DPFanatics featuring Alysa are also included. When there already was The aforementioned Let'sPlayLez and Gapeland that is kind of like a site that it is a lesbian version of, one cannot help wondering little, why the new site again, especially since the main person here isn't probably one of the hottest names of the moment.

I hope we see this site living longer than some of the new sites they've added lately although it's too early to say if they have permantently stopped. Let'sPlayLez and DailySexDose have been quiet lately with no updates scheduled, Gapeland luckily started again with a very nice scene after a while of no updates. Otherwise things look quite good with the whole network. Price is still unbeatable, technical side functions well and updates are regular and numerous. Lately my biggest issue has by far been their lack of scenes with multiple women with one man but I guess that's just their style. No serious slipping to the softcore or girls on girls side like on some other networks. Ten (plus five upcoming) scenes isn't much but it's hopefully only a start and anyway a part of already huge collection.

The score reflects the quality of the current material and reasonable expectations of the future. If it keeps up with regular updates, it'll be worth more and I'll be happy to adjust the score.

07-14-11  01:55pm

Replies (0)
Review
23
Visit Hot Legs and Feet

Hot Legs and Feet
(0)

89.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -One of the longest going sites in the DDF Prod network if not the longest one. The earliest scenes are dated January 2001 which is quite historic when it comes to internet porn
-Number of scenes going at nearly 2000 with your standard DDF Prod caveats of possible cross site content. However this site with it's clear niche is less likely to have content shared between sites and one can almost guarantee any footjob scenes are site exclusive
-Very strong approach on the subject again. Scenes may be solo, lesbian or hardcore but legs and feet are always in the focus of the action
-DDF understands that there should be multiple women in the same scene with a man. This is what 21Sextury.com could learn from
-Everything related to production and technical side is fine. Quality of photos, videos and sets in general is very high. Site works well with multiple download options, tagged searching is great too. Downloads are generally very fast and I repeatedly max out my bandwidth
Cons: -Recycling. With this network it's hard to tell if material is new or old as scenes of all ages are added regularly and it's not uncommon to see a previously removed scene added again
-This is subjective but personally I'm not that much into feet and when it comes to legs, it's good enough that they look good. This site has many scenes where the only female part getting much action are the feet and they are nothing for me. However fans of the niche will 100% disagree
-Casting scenes that are of lower quality and not very interesting
Bottom Line: Feet, legs, socks, pantyhose, stockings and some shoes and boots are the focus here. The rest varies as much as on all the DDF sites from solo girls to group hardcore action. This site has been going for a very long time and if the oldest scenes all the way from the early 2001 aren't worth much in their 320x240 video format, at least they have decent photosets with many legendary stars. Actually the very oldest ones have only photosets with the video starting few months later.

Even if one is not into the feet and legs in particular, this site offers lots of videos with enough normal sex to entertain non niche people. Due to the specific foot focus in those scenes too, they are more often site exclusive too and not found on other DDF Prod sites as often as ones on some other sites. DDF also does one thing right if one compares with the "main competitor" 21sextury.com, there are usually more women than men in the hardcore scenes. Of course there's lots of solo scenes too and many that feature maybe only short blowjob in addition to footjob so if those are your thing, you might like this site even more while for me they are just filler.

Quality of photography and video in newer scenes shines here too. The ones available in 1080p are generally very good but as they are updating also with older (sometimes recycled) material, you will see 720p too which is perhaps a bit smudgier than the new content but still nice. Photos are the subjective best in the business and available in three sizes in zips although I cannot see anyone really downloading anything but large size ones these days. The large photosets in zips are usually from few dozen to maybe fifty megabytes so no 600Mb monster zips here.

The talent is nothing new to the ones familiar with DDF and the other European sites. The names may vary from site to site but the girls are the same big Euro names of today and past years with some Americans thrown in between. In case anyone is interested, yes the guys are the same handful you have learned to tolerate on every site and film over past few decades ;)

Technical side is in good order and exactly the same as on the other network sites. After they did away with the individual site designs and interfaces, everything has been clearer and very easy to search. It's also easier to check if the content is duplicate or a re-edit of some other scene from another site. Downloads speeds are not maybe the most consistent I've experienced but generally fast enough to max out the fastest connections with a DL manager.

This site is another cornerstone of the DDF Prod network. Despite the topic, it has much to offer to users more interested in just plain action but also many 100% topic focused scenes.

07-07-11  12:21am

Replies (0)
Review
24
Visit DDF Busty

DDF Busty
(0)

93.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Huge backlog of scenes. Based on the currently available scenes the site was started in 2005 and there are close to 700 scenes available
-Most of the material appears to be exclusive to this site also in addition to being network exclusive
-Good take on the title subject. Busty here means busty with all those letters from multiple D's and up. I hate half-assed attempts at things and this one is... well, full-titted ;)
-I guess most users reading my reviews already know that I'm a huge fan of photography and this site holds the same high standards as the rest of the DDF Prod network. I haven't come across better photography in hardcore. There are some potential candidates I have not checked yet but they are quite small while this site has also numbers
-High quality video up to 1080p on the new scenes. As not all updates are new material, there are lower quality updates too but 720p has been the minimum lately
-Excellent download speeds up to 12 megabytes per second at good times
Cons: -Recycling. Old scenes are getting removed and added again as new updates. Saw a scene there, browsed some photos and went looking for it later, didn't find it anymore but to my surprise it was uploaded again few days later
-Quite heavy focus on solo scenes and girls only action. This is a strong trend with the whole network with the only all hardcore site (HandsOnHardcore) updating only bi-monthly
-Some odd amateur/casting kind of scenes with very modest quality
-1080p only as wmv
Bottom Line: A big tits site on the DDF Prod network that contains everything related to the theme from solo to girl/girl and hardcore action. They are serious about the busty thing here too so most of the ladies are really busty and none of them look out of the place on this site. The focus is on the softcore side as is the way with the whole network these days. The new updates are in very good looking 1080p video which is available unfortunately only in wmv. Other formats and streaming are available in lower resolutions. Some updates are old scenes that are removed and added again which is not a good idea. In addition to being cheap it really can confuse the long time members and those with repeated subscriptions.

This site keeps up the very high quality production with carefull makeups and attention on lighting and photography. Photos aren't the largest ones on the market anymore with those 21MP pics from 21Sextury but in my opinion they are still the most professional looking ones avaialble in these numbers.

Technical side of things is fine as can be. Downloads work well and are fast, tags used to search through the material are numerous and they return relevant results.

The models on this site are often unknown to me but among the almost 700 scenes on the sites there are many featuring the better known European busty models like Jasmine Black, Jessica Moore and Dominno. Mostly they are very good looking but of course the requirement of huge boobs means they cannot be as picky as on the other sites.

To sum it up, this is a very good, if not one of the best, part of a network that everyone interested in high production hardcore should join at least once. I'm afraid DDF is going through some hard times but that doesn't reduce the value of what they do, just the amount of it. The network all in all is a great one but I'm afraid that the main competition (21Sextury.com) is leaving them behind while the others are catching up with many formerly DVD sites (EvilAngel, RoccoSiffredi, DevilsFilm etc.) starting to offer HD quality European (also US) material at very low monthly costs.

07-01-11  09:20am

Replies (4)
Review
25
Visit Only Blowjob

Only Blowjob
(0)

87.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Huge archive of well over 1000 scenes all the way from 2002
-Beautiful models, great production values and excellent photography
-New updates are partly very good quality 1080p FullHD although the highest resolution is available ony as wmv. I'd rather take mp4
-The earlier scenes don't always keep to the theme and include other sex too. Wonder if this site used to have a different name then? This might of course be a con to someone who wants only what the title says
-Early hardcore scenes with Sophie Moone!
-The newer scenes appear as if they have been shot and staged for this site specially and exclusive. Some older ones make you wonder if the action has just been clipped short for use on multiple sites in the network
-POV updates rlately (every 3rd to 5th). About the only genre where I find them working. They are not FullHD though
-Updates every few days
Cons: -The early scenes are understandably of not so high definition even if the quality of the production was high also back then. 320x240 video doesn't cut it anymore and photos are quite small
-Some shared content across the other sites in DDF Prod network
-The only blowjob theme can get a bit boring when you easily expect and have seen more from the same models
Bottom Line: This one's another site within the DDF Prod network that could be a network of it's own. There's a huge archive of material from the days when the network packages weren't the norm so the content is also a bit mixed in the early years and sticks more closely to the title in the latter ones.

The site is one of the more regular updaters on the network with new scene every 2-3 days. The updates are a mixed bag of new 1080p material, slightly older (I guess) 720p videos and probably older and hopefully unreleased scenes in 720x404 resolution. There are also regular POV updates coming these days. All the scenes except the POV ones come with a very nice set of high quality photographs available in thre sizes and also zipped.

The site works technically very well. The scene searching and broswing work very well with tags and site categories so it's easy to find what one is lookign for amongst all these scenes.

The theme is blowjob only and the most scenes lately stick to it. Some feature oral sex both ways and sometimes they are more like standard sex scenes. The newer scenes look like they are exclusive not only to the network but to the site as well. In the older ones you can find also those that are clearly shot and edited in the same staging and props only to be uploaded on many sub sites.

There are many good oldies to be found here with European girls of the early 2000's (Sophie Moone on her hardcore days just to name an example). The video quality of these may not be that great but even the lower resolution photos on DDF sites are fine. It's funny noticing that no matter how nostalgic feeling those girls from ten years back rise in you, the male performers are the same guys, looking the same as they do today.

A very nice site all in all. Just makes me ask one question: Is the only blowjob niche (with no other special fetishes like fully clothed or such) so popular that it's a good idea to build a huge site around it?

06-22-11  01:16am

Replies (2)

Shown : 1-25 of 76 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.11 seconds.