Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Darrow (8)  

Feedback:   All (20)  |   Reviews (9)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (11)

Other:   Replies Received (13)  |   Trust Ratings (16)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-9 of 9  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit Tainster


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 10-08-10  04:21am  (Update History)
Reason: My prior review focussed mostly on billing issues (and their badness). They have radically improved their billing and this is no longer a concern.
Pros: This is the site formerly known as Eromaxx. The content is similar to the former Eromaxx site; they have all of the recent stuff (going back to 2007).

The current quality of the Videos are quite good; the highest quality video is a 1080p which is quite sharp on my Mac. It is also an MP4 which is easily usable on my Mac.

For my money the best site is "party hardcore". This may have been the first devoted to watching girls in a bar having sex with strippers; it is still the best of them.

The question that you always ask for these sites is "is it real". While I believe that for each of the parties there are one or two pro's, most of the women giving blowjobs and fucking are real. There are just too many "plain jane's" and downright ugly women having sex for them to be all pro's. This element of reality makes for a really, really compelling watch.

Drunk Sex Orgy is similar, only with pro's. There are also two really good watersports sites, if you are into that.
Cons: You can download the DVD's, but they are relatively poor quality downloads.

They also appear to have stopped uploading the higher quality back catalogue. They only appear to have gone back as far as 2007 with the high quality stuff. They have the older stuff, just not high quality older stuff.

The updating appears to have slowed down as well. It used to be that "party hardcore" religiously updated every Monday and each party had four parts. Now they are less regular with the updates and the parties are in five parts; this means that even with the religious updating the actual amount of parties you get are 20% less.

"Party Softcore": wtf?

They also have things from studio's other than "Eromaxx"; however to watch or download cost extra.

Many of these cons are just niggling things, but improvement would bring a higher rating.
Bottom Line: Excellent site. What they do, they do really well.

If you like watching orgies at a strip club, this is the site for you. You get two great sites, along with two really good Watersports sites.

07-13-10  04:26am

Replies (11)
Visit Party Hardcore

Party Hardcore

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: 1) This is a rarely explored niche; mostly amateur women having sex with strippers in front of (lots) of other women.

2) Can download the entire collection (and I have)

3) There is always lots of women giving blowjobs, and a number fucking the stippers; occasionally there is even anal. This is a lot further than you typically get with the few "girls at a party" site.

4) Not all of women are amateurs. There are some professionals; occasionally you will see one on one of the sister sites. Most are amateurs, however.

5)The women are on average pretty in a "girl next door" manner, but there is a variety. Some women are smoking hot, and some are truly ugly; I like this as the occasional ugly girl having sex tends to confirm that these are amateurs.

6) Both the video quality and the content has improved in the last two years.

7) access to Orgymaxx's straight sites; good selection of sites in somewhat unusual niches.

8) Recent price reduction was nice.
Cons: 1) The video quality could be better.

2) The direction and camerawork is sometimes odd. The camera (and film) has cut away from two people fucking and/or sucking in order to focus on clothed women dancing; sometimes it is done for coverage, but often it just looks like they want to show us clothed women in a porno site.
Bottom Line: Overall an excellent site that has become my favorite. I don't stay a member, but I rejoin every four to six months.

The orgymaxx membership is a bonus (it would be perfect if they had an anal/dp focussed site; but that is just me.)

05-03-10  05:13am

Replies (2)
Visit XL Girls

XL Girls

Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: 1) This site features all natural, large breasted, really heavy women. There are no skinny women here, but I like women with curves and there are lots of curves here. Most, if not all of these overweight woman are very beautiful.

2)It has a really large selection of photos. There are around 1500 sets; each of them are zipped for easy downloading and there is a good mix of hardcore and softcore material.

3) The video streams since about November 2009 have been decent quality: 480p and 720p.
Cons: 1) The streaming video content since November 2009 is not uniformly high quality. About 6 or 7 are lower quality streams (including two in June 2010).

2) The quality of downloadable videos is quite bad. They are 640 x 360 for both WMV and MP4 files that are somewhat grainy. Not a bother for me as I like streaming, but this would be an issue for others.

3)The older videos are utterly crappy in terms of quality and there has been no move to replace them.

4) The price: TBP lists the price as 39.99 per month recurring and it may be 29.99. This is fairly high for what this site offers. This is a bonus site when you are a member of scoreland for more than one (or maybe two) months. I find scoreland to be worthwhile to keep as a site for extended periods of time, so I get XL girls for free.

5) Updates are a bit slow. You get two or three a week.
Bottom Line: Really good site if you like your women heavy. This is an excellent photosite for looking at pictures and downloading them. In the last year, the site has become excellent for streaming video, but it is still mediocre for donwloadable videos.

Not worth the price as a stand-alone site, however as part of the Scoreland loyalty package it is excellent.

06-10-10  04:49am

Replies (0)
Visit 50Plus MILFs

50Plus MILFs

Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: I really like Milf sites. However when I go to Milf sites, I see a lot of women who are clearly in their late 20's and early 30's and I really hate that because they are not really Milfs.

You don't have the issue with 50+ Milfs. They are all 50+ and most of them are quite attractive 50+ milfs. All of them are doing hardcore and many of them do anal.

The updates are weekly; the site has a good number of videos.

Some of the models are exclusive to the score group.
Cons: Being a Mac user I prefer MP4's and MOV files. They have them, but they are the inferior quality files.

The navigation could be a little better, but it is O.K. for now.
Bottom Line: Possibly the best hardcore milf site out there. Well worth the purchase price and worth staying for awhile.

03-11-10  06:34am

Replies (0)
Visit Older Women

Older Women

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 1) I love older women; always have. I hate websites that try to cater to this love with women who are not actually old (I am looking at you Milfhunter). Women in their late 20's are not Milfs, Cougars nor older women. The women at Aunt Judy's are older women. The majority of their models are over 40 and almost all of them are really attractive older women. This is what I like to see in my older women websites.

2) Still one of the best picture sites with older women. The entire sets are zipped for easy downloading and easy viewing.

3) The new format is nice; you have access to both Aunt Judy's and Older Women and the complete archives; this effectively halves the price of membership.
Cons: 1) They still are really bad with videos. You have only been able to download or stream full videos for less than a year.

2) The video quality is still not very good. 1000 kb videos that are not very big are classified as "DVD quality"; no they are small and fairly grainy for the top quality video in 2010.

3) The video shoots themselves are not very good. Bad sound, and bad lighting abound. The bad sound is O.K. (I don't really watch porn for the sound) but the bad lighting interferes with watching the film.

4) The frequency of hardcore shoots appears to have gone down. With Older women it used to be a friday ritual to look at and download the hardcore photoshoots. The month that I join, they have precisely 2 hardcore photoshoots. I hope that this is not a trend.
Bottom Line: Still one of the best older women photo sites. If you are newbie you can get loads and loads of photos of really hot older women, including loads and loads of hardcore.

Go elsewhere for video however.

06-02-10  03:56am

Replies (2)
Visit Lover Boys USA

Lover Boys USA

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The site is ordinary women having fun (i.e. sucking and or fucking) with male strippers. There are not many (and in my view not enough) sites within this particular niche
Cons: 1) No downloads
2) Very poor quality streaming.
3) Many of the videos involve no sex. Essentially we are watching women watching male strippers. I did not pay to see women watch male strippers. What I paid to see was women watching male strippers, giving the hand jobs, blow jobs and fucking them.
Bottom Line: Really not worth the price. For roughly the same price there are better sites that offer the same niche.

Until there is significant improvement, I would stay away.

01-05-11  04:31pm

Replies (0)
Visit Mom GFs

Mom GFs

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This is an amateur site. It is organized as part of a network that focuses on particular kinds of amateurs (Milfs, blondes, legal teens etc). Each photoset is zipped and focusses on one women in various stages of undress and action. The photosets are of various quality. There is video, but it is poor quality (and I don't know whether it is downloadable.)

Lots of sets

The $1.00 trial is a full trial.
Cons: 1) Very poor quality video; not sure whether it is downloadable, and given the quality not sure why you would want to download it.

2) There is some repetition of picture sets amongst the various site.

Bottom Line: Overall if my billing issues can be dealt with without costing me money, then you can look at this as a decent picture site that looks at the amateur niche in a somewhat organized manner.

BEWARE THE BILLING ISSUES; THEY MIGHT BE TRYING TO RIP YOU OFF. I will reply to this review to update on my billing issues.

05-22-10  04:50am

Replies (2)
Visit Boozed Women

Boozed Women

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: The site appears to have legitimate amateur women at strip clubs. The sex (if any) is confined to oral.

There is access to a network; there is some stuff there that is worth watching.

Can download the clips.
Cons: Really poor video quality. Some of the stuff looks like it is taken from a phone.

Not all of the scenes have sex; some are just women watching male strippers.

The scenes are quite small and the surfing is quite bad. You can't tell, from the thumbnail what the scene is about and whether sex is involved.

For a chunk of the videos, you get repeats of scenes from another one of their sites.
Bottom Line: Not worth the price. If you are into this kind of stuff (amateur women having sex with strippers), there are alot better sites with alot better video.

05-03-10  04:32am

Replies (0)
Visit Anabolic.com


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: They have videos and they can be streamed and/or downloaded.
Cons: Lots of them.

1) Poor quality videos (I ended up not saving any)
2) Poor quality streaming.
3) Deceptively small site; the ads make it look like it has a lot of anabolic vids. Instead it doesn't.
4) Really bad navigation. Since the site was so small, it wasn't a real pain.
Bottom Line: Don't go for the monthly. If at all, stick with the 5.99 trial and then cancel.

03-11-10  06:24am

Replies (1)

Shown : 1-9 of 9  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.39 seconds.