Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : troglodite (69)  

Feedback:   All (103)  |   Reviews (38)  |   Comments (11)  |   Replies (54)

Other:   Replies Received (53)  |   Trust Ratings (34)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 26-38 of 38 Page :    < Previous Page

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit Playful Alice

Playful Alice

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: * Alice is very cute, and flexible! Her personality does get a chance to show in her vids too.

* Vids and pictures look pretty decent at 640x480 and 1200k.

* Site is easy to navigate

* She does have a webcam, though I didn't manage to make any shows during my membership (and they weren't as often as advertised).
Cons: * Video updates were few and far between - I think there were 2 during my month of membership

* Action is very tame and some vids are virtually non-nude, despite even though the tour says "Inside my members section I get really naughty and fully naked!!" She does - but don't expect it a lot. She likes to cover up the good bits a lot.

* Content is still sparse - only 9 vids so far. I don't recall the count of picsets unfortunately.
Bottom Line: After joining sites for several years now, I've joined a lot of the ones that have been around a while, so I sometimes jump a bit soon at new sites, and this was the case here. It's a very recently-launched site, and as such it just doesn't have the content to support the price tag just yet, and I was left wondering - is it my fault for joining too early, or should they have had more content available before launching?

After one evening, I felt I had seen all the site had to offer currently, and was left to count on site updates, which didn't really occur too awful regularly. Having also joined two of this company's other sites in the past (Wild Eva and Hardcore Mandy), I wasn't sure whether to expect a site with mostly tease content (like Wild Eva) or more explicit stuff which I tend to like better (like HC Mandy). Unfortunately, it was very similar to Wild Eva, but with less daring content, and much less of it.

On the bright side, I like Alice's look much better than either of the two aforementioned girls, and in time, this site can certainly grow to match their quality. Right now, however, I can only really recommend it to people who really find Alice to be super-hot. And even then, you should beware that this is mostly softcore-tease content. Don't expect to see her o-face or even more than a few coochie shots and you may end up completely satisfied.

06-30-07  11:59am

Replies (0)
Visit 123 Lacey Pink

123 Lacey Pink

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Well uh obviously....the price! Any site that charges less than 2 bucks for a month-long membership and actually has content is a big bonus!

* Videos look pretty good at 1500k and 640x480

* Lacey is a "girl-next-door" style model which will undoubtedly be a plus for a lot of people

* You also get bonus access to a bunch of other sites, including some content from bangbros and the like (though I didn't check to see how complete the scenes may be).
Cons: I feel kinda bad nitpicking a sub-$2 site, but...

* Vids don't download though they do go to your internet cache and can be copied from there to your collection

* Some questionable upsells (will touch on those in a separate "warning" comment)

* Lots of the vids are behind-the-scenes of photoshoots

* Almost all links broken in the BTS section

* Music plays during all the vids - I was disappointed that I didn't get the chance to hear the interaction between her and her cameraman.
Bottom Line: Bottom line, there are a lot of negatives here, but still - it's a $2 site and if you like Lacey's look, you'll get your moneys worth despite some minor annoyances.

There are some upsells to be aware of, namely a box that must be unchecked at initial signup and then a $0 trial that can be backed out of if done carefully (see additional comment for more info). Like I mentioned - it's hard to nitpick a site that's under $2, but upsells with no real opt-out options can end up with 2 results: 1) The member always feels like they have to watch where they click or 2) The member accidentally gets hit with a charge they didn't expect and blames the site for doing something shady. I'll put it this way - I doubt any surfers really see these upsells as exciting opportunities for more free porn.

My biggest other gripe would be the broken links and the music. BTS scenes don't really feel "behind the scenes" when there's cheesy music playing over the entire clip.

Lacey is a cutie however, and if you're at all interested in seeing her enjoying some of her favorite toys, I'd give this one at least a look. I'd score it a lot lower if I paid for a standard membership, but for $2, the site at least *met* most of my expectations. I love the concept they're going for with the low-cost sites!

06-25-07  06:02pm

Replies (1)
Visit Craving Carmen

Craving Carmen

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: * Video Quality - Things look really nice here if you go with the highest resolution vids.

* Vids are offered in multiple bitrates so you can download a lower bitrate version if you have a slow connection or don't care for the highest resolution.

* Carmen - She's definitely a hottie, and you get to get to see all of her. There are a couple of amateur-looking BJ vids on the site, but most of the fare here is solo or girl-girl.

* Camshows - Several archived solo shows to d/l
Cons: * A couple of the vids are split into episodes, which (gasp!) are split among 2 sites. One girl-girl scene is actually split into I think 7 parts, with 4 on Carmen's site, and the rest on Barbie's. I hate upsells.

* Non-nude vids - There are 64 vids here, but several of them are multi-part, and her older stuff is non-nude (about half).

* Picsets are not easy to navigate and as usual, no zipset options. I didn't bother due to inconvenience.

* No vid updates in a long time.
Bottom Line: It's hard to give this site too high of a rating. nabbed a membership way back when the site first started over a year ago and saw enough promise that it made me want to come back again. Unfortunately, she was on episode 62 when my membership ended the first time and is on episode 64 now. The number of camshows hasn't grown significantly either, and she really touts her camshows as a big reason to join her site on the tour.

I know a lot of people prefer picsets too, and hers will prove frustrating with no good download options. The thumbnails span multiple pages (sometimes 10-15) and each one must be nabbed individually.

All that said, despite the site's shortcomings, Carmen is still super hot, and a lot of her personality does show in her videos and archived camshows. She seems to have a lot of fun in her shoots, and that's refreshing when you compare her to some models who seem disinterested or bored. Her girl-girl scenes with Barbie are extremely hot, and it's a shame you'd have to purchase a membership to Barbie's site in order to see the whole things - I'm sure some people will, but Barbie's look just doesn't do it for me...sorry :(

With the lack of updates, I'm gonna have to suggest that this is a one-time one-month membership at best. As it stands, there's not much reason to join again.

05-26-07  02:37pm

Replies (2)
Visit Nikki Kane

Nikki Kane

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Action in the videos is pretty good - though you shouldn't expect much personality
- *appears* to have a weekly camshow on the camz network.
- Writes fairly frequently in a "diary", though it's only a few lines at a time.
Cons: - Content count is low - only 15 sets of pics and 15 vids.
- Did not once update through my entire month of membership. 15 sets will not sustain this site for long.
- Site is fairly basic in that it provides a minimal amount of content at very average quality levels (800kb encoding on videos, 1000x700 pics on average)
- Can't download pics as a zip or even using any kind of grabber since each one is on its own page.
Bottom Line: I got access to this site by virtue of a membership to kristinawood.com, and the same stuff I said about that site pretty much applies to this one. The 2 sites are virtually carbon copies of each other (as is the case with most multi-site memberships) and share the same downfalls in that there is an erratic update schedule, the content quality is average, and the action is fairly routine. I doubt the stars of either site really participate much beyond shooting their sets.

Another pet peeve of mine counts here too - no zipsets or direct links to the images in the picsets. You must visit each pic and right click and "save as" to keep the image. I wish more site admins would take note - It won't make me stay a member longer if you make it hard to collect the image sets. I'm a packrat, and if I know that it's going to be a pain in the neck to save the content I want, it will make me that much less likely to make a return visit.

Anyways - back to Nikki - I can't really give this site a real high recommendation, as it's very routine and just altogether average. Show some personality in the videos and make it at least look like you're not going through the motions and it will be a lot more interesting site. Some girls really make sure that you're getting to know them when you join up - you won't get that here, but at least you can leave with some pics and vids of another hottie pleasing herself for the camera. Worth a join only if you've gotta see more nikki - pass otherwise.

05-06-07  08:31pm

Replies (0)
Visit Kristina Wood

Kristina Wood

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Updates do happen, though irregularly and un-dated
- Videos look pretty good despite sub-1000k encoding.
- Kristina is a real hottie
- You get access to 2 other solo girl sites
Cons: - Only 36 sets, both of pics and videos
- Site is fairly devoid of personality.
- Camshows are done through Camz - this might not bother some people, but it usually ensures that chats will have > 100 people in them, most of who have no idea who the performer is. I'm sure it works well for the host, but definitely not a very "personal" feel. I don't even bother with cam shows through camz
- Several un-untilized portions of the site (auction, largely unused forum, small "candid shots" section)
Bottom Line: It's hard to choose what makes one site much better than another sometimes. There has to be something that makes the site unique or interesting, and this site just didn't do so for me. It wasn't that it didn't deliver what it promised, and it wasn't that Kristina wasn't a hottie (she is!) or did too much teasing and not enough getting down to business. I just haven't found myself navigating to the folder where I keep her vids on my hard drive. The quality doesn't match the best sites, there isn't much in the way of personality showing through - it's just another pretty girl getting naked and playing for the camera. As with most solo girl sites, it will likely appeal to you if you're into her, and it won't if you're not.

As for the action - there's not a lot of teasing. There is a good bit of playing. She has a few vids with a girlfriend of hers, but things don't get too hot and heavy - some assisted playing around, but never any hot girl-girl sexytime. Oh well!

Bottom line - worth a join if you're in need of a site to join and are really into Kristina. If I were deciding between a few sites though, I'd probably give the others a good hard look before subscribing here.

Tip - Kristina has a hardcore b/g scene at velvetectasy.com - of course nothing like that on her own site.

05-06-07  07:30pm

Replies (0)
Visit Melissa Midwest

Melissa Midwest

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Decent amount of content (150 video clips, 130+ picture sets)
- Good quality videos
- Regular webcam shows
- Interesting look into the life of a unique (and extremely hot) adult entertainer
Cons: - Must pay for membership to an additional site to watch archived cam footage
- No zipfile options for picture sets
- Some of the videos are released in parts, meaning an update might be just one part of a 6-part video
Bottom Line: Something about this site just made me feel like I wasn't quite getting what I paid for when I signed up, and a lot of it has to do with her *other* site, which I'll mention later and review seperately. A membership to melissamidwest.com gets you access to her wealth of videos and picturesets, which are pretty nice, but they do leave you wanting more. A lot of the vids tend to be kind of short, and some of the older stuff seems to be a bit softer than her most current sets, although you do see some interesting updates.

Melissa is not only a web model, but also a great promoter of her site. She has videos of her doing feature shows at adult clubs and also things like various radio shows. These kinds of "candid" shots at her life as an adult entertainer do tend to make her site stand out as a "different" kind of solo site.

Like I mentioned the biggest gripe is that you must purchase a membership to melissacamvideos to view her webcam archive. Most solo model sites include these with their regular site membership, but not Melissa. If you're like me, this will have you grumbling and feeling like you're not quite getting what you paid for. Put it all in one site, and I would bet that many people would even be willing to pay a little more than the $24.95 price, considering the amount of content that would be included, but as it is, the combined price of paying for 2 sites feels like a bit much.

It looks like melissamidwest now gives access to melissacamvids, which was my biggest gripe before. I am not going to join up to verify since it's mentioned in her tour, but I'll adjust the score. +10 points for including all the content her site *should* have included from the start! Now it's a deal not to be missed!

04-22-07  06:52pm

Replies (0)
Visit Brooke Skye

Brooke Skye

Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: 1) Quantity - Right now up to episode 192, plus a few bonus un-numbered "thank you" and "member request" videos.

2) Quality - Videos are mostly of the highest quality at 1280x720. 5 different bandwidth options if you're not as big a stickler for clarity. Even the 3rd
"high" option looks good at 640x480.

3) Brooke - Completely and utterly amazing looking girl. Even better is that this is not what I would consider a "tease" site. Brooke puts those fingers to good use in over half the vids.
Cons: Hmm...hard to find a problem with this site. There are some ads on the front page and after you log in. You don't get to choose your own username/password. Picture and Video episodes are not separated. Some vids (maybe 1/4 of them - and some of those are self-made vids by brooke with a decent webcam) don't have the HD option.
Bottom Line: This is nearly what I'd consider the perfect solo girl site...

Hot girl? Check!
Some steamy girl-girl action? Check!
A little hardcore mixed in? No...damn!
Lots of vids? Check!
HD quality? Check!
Consistently Updating? Check!
Multi-site access to other solo girl sites? Check!
Discounted price? Check!

I know Brooke has done hardcore before. It doesn't really fit the theme of her site, but if she managed to toss a couple of scenes in there, I'd consider this the perfect site.

04-20-07  02:07pm

Replies (1)
Visit All Sites Access

All Sites Access

Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: There's a sheer mass of content among this network of sites. If you are a fan of a girl who's been a hardcore adult performer over the last 5 (?) years, you're likely to find her again here. The quality of content has grown with technology, and today each video clocks in at over 1600kbps and 720x480 resolution. The network spans so many genres that it would be hard to find a *normal* type of porn that is not featured here.
Cons: Things get maddeningly routine throughout most of the sites. Scenes are differentiated almost exclusively by the performer, and not the scenario or the action. Even down to the positions used, there's usually a strict pattern. Things aren't as clearly labeled as I would like. We all know it's not really "real", so make it easier for us to find our favorite stars. Some sites, like In the VIP, will feature 3-4 female performers, but they identify the scene by just one performer's name.
Bottom Line: I sounded awful harsh in the "cons" section to give this site a 94 really, but even with those faults, it's still what I consider to be the top network out there. I've kept a membership for probably 2 years running thanks to a hefty discount they offered upon cancellation that I decided was too good to pass up (though I hear that option is no longer available so don't be surprised if you don't get a similar offer).

Bottom line - if you don't care about variety in style or extremely well-acted "reality" scenarios, you'll be hooked on this network like I have been. If you're a collector of your favorite performer's scenes, you're likely to find one somewhere in this network, and quite possibly more than one place. There's so much here that it will literally take you months to download everything you want - and as someone else already mentioned, they do have measures in place to make sure of that (a download limit). However, I think the limit is flexible. I haven't hit it in a long time, and I know that for sure I have gone well over 1Gb downloading in one session without incident. Your mileage may vary, but I can't imagine anyone having too many gripes about dropping the cash for a one month membership to this network. I consider it a "must join".

04-11-07  06:55pm

Replies (0)
Visit Jenny Heart

Jenny Heart

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Jenny would be about the only pro here. The site is designed fairly well too for browsing. There are plenty of photosets and videos of Jenny doing everything from friendly interviews to bouncing on some pole. Cameraman/woman does a good job at getting some unique views of the "situations" to keep the videos interesting.
Cons: Video quality is horrendous - just about the worst I've seen from any sites lately. They are 320x240, but other sites handle even that low resolution better than this network does. It's a shame because the content of the videos looks like it would be great. The pics look much nicer, and the action is hot, but there's no way to download them beyond clicking on each one. I can't imagine many people will take the time to save each one individually to make a set. Convenience is key!
Bottom Line: I can't really recommend this unless someone is just dying to see Jenny's content. She really is a great looking girl, and her sex scenes are in some ways better than many others I've seen come out of the major porn studios - I'm not a big fan of the "let's spend 90% of the move in 20x zoom mode" porn that's out there, and thankfully this site doesn't try to do that. Although there's a good number of pics and videos here, I think the site as a whole is missing a lot of small convenience and quality things that will translate into a frustrating experience for the user. It's unfortunate, because Jenny is worthy of much better than what the site currently has to offer.

04-09-07  09:28pm

Replies (0)
Visit Kitty Karsen

Kitty Karsen

Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Kitty is pretty, and she's got a decent amount of content up right now. She's very young looking, and does a decent amount of talking to the camera before getting down to more naughty business. Archived webcam chats are a nice bonus. She had about 20 hour-long shows up when I last visited. You also get access to other sites in her network, which are similar.
Cons: Can be a little overacted at times (let's be honest - how many of us really want to see her play marbles or roll around on a giant ball?), but then again I'm sure the goal is to provide variety among the different scenes instead of doing the normal strip - play with self - smile and wave goodbye. Video quality could be better in this day and age. I'd resub fairly quickly if she adopted a hi-res format. My bonus site access went away halfway through my month of membership. Not sure why.
Bottom Line: Kitty Karsen is a pretty good site. You won't see a lot of her own influence on the site outside of the webchats (hosted through the Camz network), but some people like myself don't really need that. There is a good amount of content to occupy your time with, although none of it is very high-resolution. If you're looking for HD-hotties, look elsewhere, but if you're looking for a young looking teen acting out some fun scenarios, Kitty's site should provide you with a good month of membership, and maybe more.

04-09-07  09:04pm

Replies (1)
Visit Karen Dreams

Karen Dreams

Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: Site has lots of content. It has been running for 2-3 years now, and has steadily added material. It started as a strictly non-nude site but she's gotten more daring since and now gets nude, though you rarely get a peek at "the goods". Her content has evolved with technology, and the newest pics and videos are being released in high res formats. Large archive of cam vids is a bonus too, as is one ticket to spend on her more risque zipsets.
Cons: Nothing really bad here. If you don't like Karen, you obviously won't join the site. She did get breast implants a year or so ago, and I know that can affect people's opinions sometimes. Some might like to know that the pics tend to be a little less risque than the videos. It is mostly a softcore site, so don't expect to log in and find out what new toys Karen has been sitting on lately.
Bottom Line: While some sites claim to give you a glimpse into the life of their performers, it's rare that one actually accomplishes that like KarenDreams. She has loads of content, and it varies from week to week. A lot of sites fall into the "watch as I discover 95 ways to masturbate" niche, and while those can of course be great and interesting sites, it's refreshing to see one that sticks to its guns and really does allow the performer's personality to show through. The site will be a little tame for some, but that's ok. For those who don't need things to be too hardcore, I'm sure they'll find Karen's site to be entertaining.

04-09-07  08:49pm

Replies (0)
Visit Jodi Bean

Jodi Bean

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Jodi is pretty hot. The videos are clear. Pictures are decent at 800x600ish quality. The site has a very FTV look to it, which I know a lot of people are familiar with. Navigation is easy.
Cons: The site claims to be "rich in member interaction", but there is none. Jodi has a blog with the last post being 1/3/07 (which from I think is about when the site was launched). The message board says "coming soon". And a pet peeve of mine, the videos start out with her already nude doin' her thing. Personally, I like a little tease before revealing all the goods, but that's just personal preference. One vid I downloaded was broken. There have been no updates since I joined (roughly 25 days ago)
Bottom Line: Check out the tour - if you like what you see there, that's what you're going to get inside. Don't expect a tease or a lot of buildup. Don't expect exceptional picture or video quality. Don't expect a frequent update schedule (at least not yet). But you can expect exactly what you see in the tour, just in much larger doses. My recommendation - unless you're really into Jodi, give this site a while to grow into itself.

04-09-07  08:17pm

Replies (0)
Visit Dream Kelly

Dream Kelly

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Kelly herself would be the biggest "pro" this site has. Of course it's opinion, but she's one of the best looking porn girls out there, and she doesn't disappoint with extra shyness. The second best thing would be the newest videos. She just recently started adding some hi-res videos that look head and shoulders better than her old ones (mentioned in "cons" below). Pictures are solid, but they're not usually what draws me to a site so I won't comment too strongly either way.
Cons: The older videos are horrible quality. 296kb encoded wmvs do not look good on today's larger monitors. I had been a member once before, but decided there was no way I'd join again unless the video quality got much better. Thankfully it did, but the majority of the content is not up to today's standards. The site also seems to die on me sometimes for about 5 minutes (flood protection? I'm not downloading THAT fast lol!)
Bottom Line: If you're not concerned about getting an overwhelming amount of high-quality video content and you think Kelly is a hottie, you should enjoy her site. It's very corporate, with zero interaction from Kelly herself, but some of that can be excused due to the content, which is undergoing a marked improvement. I wouldn't necessarily say join today (only 4 HQ videos up so far), but I'd keep an eye on the site and plan on a visit in a few months once they've had time to fill out the poor content with more modern multimedia. Score of 79 puts it right on the verge of "recommended".

04-09-07  03:10pm

Replies (3)

Shown : 26-38 of 38 Page :    < Previous Page

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.44 seconds.