| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Strapon Lesbians
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from King:
(DpornGuy's Reply)
OK. I get it! This site will be on my wish list. Thanks again.
|
05-16-07 07:11am
|
Reply
52
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Khan:
(DpornGuy's Reply)
One thing you might consider is to add a few comments to your user profile. There you can give an overview of what you tend to look for and why you may judge harsher than some. It's possible that with that additional context, others will understand your reviews better.
Just a thought.
|
05-16-07 06:52am
|
Reply
53
|
Strapon Lesbians
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from King:
(DpornGuy's Reply)
Thanks, free samples are not looking good. And since I am seeking mostly for HQ vids I am dissapointed when site offers vids smaller than 100MB (it is obvious that no quality fits inside). I say dissapointed becuase the content seems attractive :)
|
05-15-07 03:54pm
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Khan:
(DpornGuy's Reply)
As only one person has left a comment(on your acct), I'm guessing you're assuming the reason for the rest of the no votes.
Remember, basically the Trust rating is a statement of how accurate a reviewer will be to what the reader will see if they visit the site. Despite some users wanting to read it as such, it isn't a comment on anyone's personal trustworthiness.
So, if you tend to rate sites low, then yes, it *could* translate into meaning your reviews will not reflect what other users would rate the site. But, if you're happy with your higher standards, there's certainly no reason why you should modify your scoring.
Oh, and I'm not sure where the competition is. As each user is entitled to post their own opinions, I can see no real motivation to "discredit" other users. Perhaps you can speak more to your comment on this part?
|
05-15-07 03:35pm
|
Reply
55
|
Strapon Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Review
from King:
Hey, What is exact vid quality for new vids and how many of them, I mean resolution and bitrate
|
05-15-07 03:31pm
|
Reply
56
|
Velvet Ecstasy
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Review
from Victor:
It actually updates twice a week with exclusive hardcore videos, twice a week with exclusive nude photos and five times a week with bonus content.
|
05-13-07 10:50pm
|
Reply
57
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Comment
from Khan:
DpornGuy asked, "...but it's a softcore site most ly right?"
If you look at the replies to the comment by user "exemplar67" (just below your comment) you'll see that the webmaster of the site answered the question about the site being softcore.
In her words, "...there is no hardcore sex content on godsgirls. it is a softcore erotica community."
Hope that helps.
|
02-12-07 08:55pm
|
Reply
58
|
Gods Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Comment
from SnowDude:
I have been criticial of this too and I'm not sure what the admins can do about it. If the person really loves the site and can't think of any way it could improve I suppose we have to accept that as an honest opinion. I would argue that it hurts the site more than it helps because people won't take a review of 100 seriously. Perhaps I can join the site at some point to offer my fair evaluation and I encourage others to do so as the average of scores will eventually even things out. Hopefully after more reviews are done the average will balance everyone's views of the site, but for now I guess we'll have to accept that members who really like the site will use their platform here to express that opinion...that is the American way. :)
|
02-12-07 08:30pm
|
Reply
59
|
Torbe Network
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Review
from King:
Been there a while ago. Everything looked promising so it is a dissapointment.
|
02-12-07 05:05pm
|
Reply
60
|
Mommy 4 Sex
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from roseman:
(DpornGuy's Reply)
lol, indeed.
|
01-28-07 11:54am
|
Reply
61
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Review
from weezerboy:
An excellent review and I have one question if you don't mind answering.
According to TBP there are over 420 videos but how many of them are actually man-woman fucking? Because I believe a lot of the videos are just blowjobs which I am not interested in. I am only interested in actual fucking videos.
Would appreciate your answer - thanks.
|
01-24-07 01:35am
|
Reply
62
|
Christine Young
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Review
from Brainpat:
I understand and respect your opinion even if I don't necessarily agree with it.
The site is still updated but just not as often. It does offer tons of scenes and picture sets already. Also, like you said, you get complete access to over 45 other great sites covering all tastes and fetishes.
I'd like to close by saying I understand Christine Young's fans ( and there's tons of them ) will never have enough of their favorite solo girl site, but since we do care about the fans, we will update the site once a week for the next couple of months.
I hope this sounds like a fair deal.
|
01-10-07 12:44pm
|
Reply
63
|
Liz Vicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from King:
(DpornGuy's Reply)
See my reviews, you'll know my type :)
|
01-10-07 10:18am
|
Reply
64
|
Liz Vicious
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Review
from King:
Not my type of a girl. I would never sign up for it, but...you must be in love dude ;p
|
01-09-07 03:54pm
|
Reply
65
|
Velvet Ecstasy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from BostonPJR:
(DpornGuy's Reply)
Appreciate the feedback just the same. And is it me or do we probably subscribe to way too much porn?
|
01-09-07 10:46am
|
Reply
66
|
Melissa Ashley
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Review from DpornGuy:
well i gave it a 30 because as a porn site it's very lame. BUT, if you're looking to get to know her and be involed like a fan, it's a fair site...
it boils down to reasons. if people want to get to know her, then this is the site for them. but if they just want her porn or whatnot, there are better options.
|
01-09-07 10:29am
|
Reply
67
|
Christine Young
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Review
from BostonPJR:
I agree. So much potential. What could have been ...
|
01-09-07 10:10am
|
Reply
68
|
Melissa Ashley
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Review
from BostonPJR:
I can tell you weren't impresed with the site, neither was I. Moostly dissapointed. But a 30? If I gave a site a 30, I'd probably have nothing in the pro section at all. Or my bottom line would be "If you like flat chested teen sites ... still don't join!"
|
01-09-07 10:04am
|
Reply
69
|
Velvet Ecstasy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BostonPJR:
(DpornGuy's Reply)
Decent point there, I was unimpressed with the content a few months ago, but 106 sets is quite a bit. It's still getting no score of 90 from me. Not with 1998-quality video. But I'll update my review.
|
01-09-07 09:59am
|
Reply
70
|
Liz Vicious
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Review
from blackmanwhat:
Be careful with this type of site and especially this type of review. The model is attractive but no other offical review was made so I need second opinion of real truth. Being too bias and too one sided is bad. Sorry dude it this review is too good to be true. (or if any). PEACE.
|
01-08-07 10:53pm
|
