| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
High Def Teen Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from alexmedia:
That's true. TBP and PU should check their information.
|
01-10-10 05:09pm
|
Reply
2
|
XL Girls
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from messmer:
(pornpundit's Reply)
Nothing wrong with logos if they are discretely tucked away near the bottom and away from the model's face and other interesting features!
All I can add to your remarks is: to each his own. To me large logos are a mutilation of a picture or video and I'm always ready to voice my opinion on that because I really believe a site, by reducing super large logos could increase its business.
To you they're helpful in sorting! Why a big watermark/logo should be important when it comes to that I'll never understand. Wouldn't a smaller one identify who produced the set/video just as well or is it a case of impaired vision? But here we go again: Not everyone's taste and methods of collecting are the same.
Thankfully there are enough sites of all kinds to keep both of us happy. As they say in Germany: "One man's owl is another man's nightingale!"
|
07-15-08 10:24am
|
Reply
3
|
XL Girls
(2)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from Khan:
We've looked at this several times now and don't see a problem. Each time we check, when we enter the id/pw/email and click the "join by credit card" link, it brings up the page where we'd enter CC info.
We can only suggest that you contact the site directly.
Sorry we can't be of more help but again, the site seems to be working fine for us.
|
07-15-08 08:58am
|
Reply
4
|
XL Girls
(2)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from mr smut:
I would have been able to enter my credit card details ... strange isn't it? Have you tried to contact them via mail?
Cheers,
Smut
|
06-22-08 02:39pm
|
Reply
5
|
Dirty Director
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from HeatherMcXxx:
(pornpundit's Reply)
Hi pornpundit - I'm not sure what e-mail you're referring to. Sorry.
|
09-16-07 04:50am
|
Reply
6
|
Dirty Director
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from HeatherMcXxx:
Pornpundit, why not write an official review of the site? Or have you opted not to become a member based on your criticisms above?
|
09-15-07 08:49am
|
Reply
7
|
9Buck Fat Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from Pelcito:
This site has been corrected and now you can download all content without any restrinction for a simple $9 monthly membership. There´re no limits of any kind nor any kind of extra charges.
For a $9 membership you can download all content in DVD Quality and have access to all bonus sites aswell. This includes access to watch and download over 5,000 movies in MPEG format at 640x480 (closest to DVD Quality), iPod format, WMV formats as well without any limits.
Thanks and hope you can still consider this site, as we understand is one of the best valuable offer over the net.
|
09-05-07 04:57am
|
Reply
8
|
Score Videos
(1)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from Boobs4ever:
is the streaming quality better then download file resolution? Ive noticed some sites some comment about sites having that way and I really feel tricked when it is that way!!
|
08-29-07 06:25am
|
Reply
9
|
Score Videos
(1)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from Boobs4ever:
lol funny but I dont see how when you got turtle dial (slow internet connection you mean right?) would stream isnt that even more ennoyin when the video buffs a freeze all the as it does when the temporary file does on stream am I rong? I may think In rong direction...
But anyways I just have to download a prewiev of video from here and see how it looks to watch porn from a frosted shower door sounds like fun experienced that I wouldnt pay for tho lol the other comments are fun aswell but that one takes the prize Nice comment Dude
|
08-29-07 06:16am
|
Reply
10
|
Score Videos
(1)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Comment
from Drooler:
Hey I love these comments! "Like watching TV (bad resolution already if it's standard) through a frosted shower door" was especially good, but not the only one!
|
08-28-07 12:10pm
|
Reply
11
|
BBW Tales
(0)
|
Reply of
pornpundit's Review
from Khan:
Admin Note:
I've edited the above review to remove the numbering of pros and cons.
i.e.
"Pro #1 Sentance"
The numbering of pro and cons was just offered as an example in our FAQ.
All other comments were unedited.
|
03-10-07 08:37am
|
