Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Dillon (0)  

Feedback:   All (7)  |   Reviews (1)  |   Comments (1)  |   Replies (5)

Other:   Replies Received (12)  |   Trust Ratings (9)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-12 of 12  

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Kim's Anal Heaven

Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
Reply of Dillon's Review from hogosos:

I have to tell ya that I have seen many T-Girls over the past few years, but the legs and cock on this girl is to die for. I had a fuckin instant hard-on when I saw Kim. As a few of you have stated, you gotta like it to love it, well I love Kim.
She even personally e-mailed me a couple of times thanking me for my subscription. She has many members to her site, but her fine looks coupled with her personal touch is second to none!
There is not a part of her body, that I wouldn' gladly put my tongue!
I fuckin worship her, man!


03-12-09  07:51am

Reply
2
Visit Kim's Anal Heaven

Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from badandy400: (Dillon's Reply)

There really is no need to insult users here. Insults tend to be a signal of impending defeat in discussion forums, as I am sure any of our several psychiatrists would concur. We try very hard to keep a decent, educated site. While I do not exactly like JoeMushashi's reply, you were definitely on the offensive with your first statement to him.

Yes "Kims Anal Heaven" does leave ample room for interpretation. Yes anyone could have deduced that the site would be about anal toying and such. But I also would believe there would be more than just large didlos. I would expect to see hardcore and likely a good number of cum shots. JoeMushashi's point was that he was disappointed with the site's content. He stated what he expected the site to be and why he expected that based on the trailer video.

What sets JoeMushashi apart from the many shill users that have come about due to this site is that he gave us his reason and his explanation for his reason. That is what we ask for, good or bad. He felt the trailer video was misleading and he warned fellow PUs about it.

So I would like to ask, are you affiliated with this site in some way, or are you just head over heels for it?


03-10-09  07:41pm

Reply
3
Visit Kim's Anal Heaven

Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
Reply of Dillon's Review from Jeffrey99:

My problem isn't with the fact that he gave the site a 100, if you think it's that good so be it, however you went into no techincal detail on anything. For example, what size are those so called "Hi Res Photos"? What size are the videos? How often is it updated? What makes this site any different from the million other sites out there? You mentioned none of that in the review. Hell, even your cons are useless.

Maybe your a spammer, I don't know. But if you really wanna post reviews your have to get more in depth then that. That looks more like a forum post selling a site, then a review.


03-10-09  10:38am

Reply
4
Visit Kim's Anal Heaven

Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
Reply of Dillon's Comment from badandy400:

That is not true either. We tend to ignore or question the extreme low scoring reviews when reasoning is not given in reasonable amounts. No site is perfect and no two people are the same, so of course there will be differences. However, most of us can agree on roughly how good a site is. If I give a site an 85, there is likely going to be someone else who gives it an 83 or 87 based on something they liked or disliked that I am impartial to. We usually stay in the same area though, and everyone who is trusted gives valid reasons and explains why those reasons are important to them.

I checked out the link you provided. Image this, a T-girl getting nice compliments from other T-girls and T-girl wannabes. That is about as useful as asking a chain smoker what they feel about raising the taxes on cigarettes. Of course the opinions will be biased! I believe you will have come up with a better argument than that.

I enjoy many sites, but do not give them 100's and at times not even in the 90's. This may be because they are lacking elsewhere. It looks as if the site we are discussing updates only weekly. The site I gave a 100 to updates five times per day! Perfection does not keep us waiting.

Had you come on here and given 85-90, I do not think anyone would have thought much of it. But 100's right out of signing up just do not float well. Particularly when Khan has already told us that there have been issues with people creating multiple accounts to artificially boost the site.


03-10-09  09:12am

Reply
5
Visit Kim's Anal Heaven

Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from JoeMushashi: (Dillon's Reply)

I can read, jerk-off. The name "Anal Heaven" can mean very broad things, moron, so good luck finding your brain. Her galleries and vids I saw were misleading, as noted by my review. Little content, slow updates, etc. Look at the membership of sites like Shemale Yum and Shemale Strokers, look at the quality of content, and go from there. Anyway, you sound like a complete jerk-off so enough of you.

03-10-09  08:55am

Reply
6
Visit Kim's Anal Heaven

Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
Reply of Dillon's Comment from TheSquirrel:

It's about time all these were removed IMO. If anyone wants to subscribe to this oragnisation after all this, you deserve all that you get, which judging by the one reliable review about this site, isn't a lot.

03-10-09  07:26am

Reply
7
Visit Kim's Anal Heaven

Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
REPLY TO #5 from Khan: (Dillon's Reply)

The reason I asked is because we've seen a rash of reviews submitted in the last few days all raving about the same site. At least two of those reviews were removed when we discovered the person submitting them created several accounts just to rave about the site. A site that previously had only one (not so flattering) review.

As you're discovering, our regular users tend to distrust new users who create an account just to give a particular site a high score. You'll have to understand that they've seen this type of behavior many times in the past from sites hoping to boost their popularity.

As a rule, our users are suspicious of anyone who gives a 100 (signifying a perfect site that has no room for improvement) especially when that review is from a brand new user. Those types of reviews tend to read more like promotions than unbiased reviews. Often those types of reviews are from "shills" or else extremely loyal fans.

Of course, you are entitled to your opinion. But perhaps this will help you better understand the reaction you're seeing from our regular users.


03-10-09  06:45am

Reply
8
Visit Kim's Anal Heaven

Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
REPLY TO #3 from TheSquirrel: (Dillon's Reply)

As Andy has said, most of the members here can spot a fake. It can either be someone affiliated to the site or someone who just registers to go over the top in praise about one particular site. Neither of these reviewer types are particular trustworthy IMO. The signs are all there - a quick review, a first review from a new member, no objectivity, no negatives, full of "what else can I say a brilliant site" type comments, a ridiculusly high mark, and no, or little, tech specifications, then they disappear without any further reviews. Allied to that, you have a number of these reviews all in quick succession. Maybe it's the site itself that deserves a "no" trust. I would strongly suggest the members here take a note of the other sites under the same ownership and treat them with high suspicion. I would also suggest to these new members to hand around and put in some reviews. Then maybe people will treat them seriously and not be so suspicious.

03-10-09  06:18am

Reply
9
Visit Kim's Anal Heaven

Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
REPLY TO #1 from badandy400: (Dillon's Reply)

Where are these comments you say you posted, or are you talking about this reply? Just want to be sure because there are no other comments for this site posted.

There is obviously a real person behind the posts, but I do not believe that person has the general users best interests in mind. After all, all the recent reviews for this site have read just about the same. The seem as if they were written by the same person.


03-10-09  06:12am

Reply
10
Visit Kim's Anal Heaven

Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
Reply of Dillon's Review from TheSquirrel:

This is bullshit. I have awarded my first 2 negative votes to the two members who gave this site 100. A well deserving negative in my opinion. As you can see I did not do it anonymously.

03-10-09  05:48am

Reply
11
Visit Kim's Anal Heaven

Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Khan: (Dillon's Reply)

Dillon, may I ask how you heard about our site and what prompted you to come praise Kim's Anal Heaven at this particular time?

03-10-09  05:20am

Reply
12
Visit Kim's Anal Heaven

Kim's Anal Heaven
(0)
Reply of Dillon's Review from badandy400:

Looks like we have another spoof here. This site is quickly hitting my Shit List! Something tells me that thee will be a few more before this all plays out.

03-10-09  12:54am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-12 of 12  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.3 seconds.