| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Erotic Beauty
(2)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
from Drooler:
I've noticed those inconsistencies, too, in the database and just generally in the naming of the models. Whenever I see someone first on MetArt or on MetModels and then she shows up on the other site, I always look for the name in my own "database" file system. Sometimes it's easy, and sometimes it's a pain if I'm sure I've gotten pics of the model before but not with the name shown at the time.
The editing mistakes might be due to using pages and code from one set to another, where they don't double check everything that needs to be changed before they post a new set. I've seen worse, but it's still a problem, of course.
|
06-06-09 02:06pm
|
Reply
2
|
Erotic Beauty
(2)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
from lk2fireone:
Review has lots of nice details. If money is no object, then belonging to both met-art and metmodels would be nice. Because then you would get to see all the sets at both sites. But since money is limited for most of us, met-art is the better value. The quality and style (teen glamour) of both sites is basically the same. The main difference is that met-art has a huge amount of content compared to metmodels.
|
06-06-09 11:44am
|
Reply
3
|
Erotic Beauty
(2)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
from zzzins:
Nicely informative. I'm a big fan of Met-Art and always wondered what extra Met Models had to offer.
|
06-06-09 10:46am
|
Reply
4
|
Hegre Art
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(nutcrackr's Reply)
I've been passing up on several of the more recent sets. Take the Suzie Carina "Pink" set today. Pretty ordinary, as you say, and I've got a huge stock of this girl already with some really nice sets.
The site's a real mixed bag of sometimes hot, too often not. Lately, more not than hot.
|
09-04-09 03:38am
|
Reply
5
|
Hegre Art
(2)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
from jd1961:
Hegre is a poor man's Galitsin!
|
06-07-09 11:22pm
|
Reply
6
|
Hegre Art
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(nutcrackr's Reply)
I agree it has gotten boring. Not always, but too often. I was on a year's subscription, which ended, but I'm biding time before I go back. It's a shame, because the site has so many pluses, but it doesn't matter if the content isn't interesting enough.
The boredom factor is one reason why I wonder how much longer the site will go on.
As for their forums, they should either deal with it (listen, respond, take action) or not have forums.
|
04-16-09 02:29am
|
Reply
7
|
Hegre Art
(2)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
from Drooler:
I think you sum up well what has been going wrong with the site, particularly what you say in the final paragraph of the bottom line.
That fetish stuff has got to go for sure. Back in the days when they had regular sets of Marketa Belonoha, Sophie Paris, Divinity Raye (but different name at Hegre), and Katie (from Brazil), they were certainly better.
But even the stuff they do of Anna S and Orsi doesn't show enough sensuality, IMHO.
|
02-14-09 12:04pm
|
Reply
8
|
Met Art
(8)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(nutcrackr's Reply)
It's why I call Majoly "The Master Shellacker." Same everything but done by Tim Fox would have been a lot nicer.
|
10-02-09 01:37am
|
Reply
9
|
Met Art
(8)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
from Drooler:
I'd taken to calling Majoly the "Master Shellacker" for what are obvious reasons. But actually, the most-most recent stuff is looking more natural/less 'shopped. Maybe we're being listened to. And maybe it's not just us.
There was a photographer who was even WORSE -- Magoo! Haven't seen that name for a while at MetArt. Fortunately.
|
04-05-09 01:35pm
|
Reply
10
|
Met Art
(8)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Review
from Wittyguy:
Good review (here and on Hegre Art too). My only advice is that if you start reviewing sites that don't have as many reviews as these is to give a few more site statistics (pic and video sizes, zips, etc.). Otherwise things look pretty sweet.
|
03-27-09 03:00pm
|
Reply
11
|
MPL Studios
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(nutcrackr's Reply)
They're strict about download managers. Here's an excerpt from the current terms of use:
"Site owner reserves the right to limit the amount of materials viewed or downloaded on this site. Multi threaded downloading programs, site ripping software, and spidering bots are not supported on this site.
Enjoy MPL Studios' web site, but please adhere to the downloading guidlines when using it. Fraud and Filesharing have made this level of site security necessary. There are three downloading violations that will block your account or have it closed for Terms of Use violations:
1) Repeatedly attempting to download more than 2 zips at the same time
2) Multi threading downloads (making multiple requests for the same file)
3) Using a bot to spider or scrape the site."
I am a current member. I like the site, though it doesn't do it for me each and every day. But photo quality is usually really good, and they're very selective about the babes there. Anya and Alisa are among the top favorites.
Sometimes the galleries are "postcards" or BTS stuff, without nudity. I generally consider those to be compliments to the fully nude stuff, which sometimes has no stripping.
|
08-08-09 10:43am
|
Reply
12
|
MPL Studios
(2)
|
Reply of
nutcrackr's Comment
from Drooler:
I've noticed. It's a positive change. Navigation problems (that I'd complained about in my review) seem to have been resolved. The setup is now more like FemJoy. It's easier now to access zip files.
It's nice when a site makes internal improvements but keeps its front door the same. Usually, it's the other way around.
The only thing I don't like is the black background color. Makes it look as if you're at at different site all of sudden. But I can live with it.
|
08-08-09 02:09am
|
Reply
13
|
Rigin Studio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(nutcrackr's Reply)
True, it doesn't necessarily stop piracy; it just makes harder, for everyone. And I've tried downloadthem all with Firefox on this site, but it didn't work.
|
05-31-09 04:49am
|
