Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Anth (4)  

Feedback:   All (10)  |   Reviews (2)  |   Comments (2)  |   Replies (6)

Other:   Replies Received (11)  |   Trust Ratings (10)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-11 of 11  

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit WD Girls

WD Girls
(0)
Reply of Anth's Review from rearadmiral:

Interesting review of a unique site. Never in a million years would I have guessed that this would be a porn niche.

10-21-13  02:37pm

Reply
2
Visit WD Girls

WD Girls
(0)
Reply of Anth's Review from WDGirls:

Dear Anth, thank you for your review and let me just reply to some of your points:

- the PIN code is just ONE, it does not need to be emailed every day, it's unique for each customer and does not change during his membership period. Also in 99% cases it's sufficient to type it only ONCE during the first download (the exceptions are people with variable IP addresses).

- the girls aren't Russian, they are Czech and we translate all the bits that are worth it. We don't translate worthless chat ("oh I bought a new T-shirt yesterday" or lines that are repeated five times in a minute - mostly shouts of sighs) because if we had to translate every single line, we probably wouldn't be doing anything else, it's really time-consuming and we prefer to focus on searching for new girls or trying to improve the security of our site because our videos are very popular on file-sharing servers. Some of the girls are also not that smart and translating what they say is really not worth hearing :-)

- naked girls - some girls insist they don't want to get naked in front of the camera (it's in the agreement with them) and we have to respect that but that's a minority, probably only one in fifteen or so. Besides that, CCBill is for some reason very restrictive about the combination of naked girls and alcohol.

- pee scenes - a lot of customers ask us for close-ups of the pussies, now you say it's far too close... well, you can see it's not easy to please everybody :-) If the decision was only up to us, we would be filming from far because then the girls would be happy that their intimate parts are not all over the internet.

- the safety of the girls is our #1 priority. We all know that any case of alcohol poisoning (even with a happy ending) could mean the end of the site so we're careful. Some of the girls get totally wasted but we do check them in regular intervals when they pass out and they're safe (although the whole apartment is a mess sometimes :-) Also soft drinks are often consumed during breaks to lower the blood alcohol content.

Anyway, we're glad you enjoyed our site and we hope you stay our customer for a long time :-)


10-21-13  07:59am

Reply
3
Visit WD Girls

WD Girls
(0)
Reply of Anth's Review from Marcus:

Thanks for the review.

The anti-hacking solution of emailing a code every day piqued my interest - most solutions are normally grossly unfair to members (ie, no zips, unable to download videos etc), but although a lot of hassle, at least it seems to be fair.

I'm not really a fan of restrictions, but that probably sounds like one of the better solutions if they really do need to do something.


10-20-13  10:52pm

Reply
4
Visit Let's Try Anal

Let's Try Anal
(1)
Reply of Anth's Comment from pat362:

I don't know if the error messages you got were a glitch or they were trying to trick you but I tend to lean toward a glitch since you were offered a one month membership at a reduced cost when you could have cancelled the trial. The sad part for you is that if you had simply used the TBP/PU link then you would have gotten a 1 month membership for 20$ instead of 25$ or in your case 26$ since you paid a 1$ for the trial as well.

P.S: I don't know if you read any of the reviews prior to trying the site but if you didn't then let me give you a small piece of advice. Please do so in the futur because you will save yourself some money and a lot of headache. If you hade checked TBP's review of the site then you would have seen that the trial is very limited and it tells you what you get with the trial membership.


03-17-13  09:45am

Reply
5
Visit Facial Abuse

Facial Abuse
(1)
Reply of Anth's Review from pat362:

I respect anyone's choice when it comes to the type of porn they like to watch as long as the women appearing on the site are aware of what will happen to them and there is no BS. I tried FA twice and it's no secret that second one was a huge mistake for me. Their brand of porn is in my opinion not remotely funny nor is it in any way kind toward the female that foolishly decide to appear on the site. The best word to describe their brand of porn is cruelty.

I read accounts from two different porn performers on the treatment they were subjected to on their FA shoot. I even saw the pictures of one of the girls who stopped the shoot and pretty much told the guys to F..k off. The girl in question was quite comfortable with BSDM so it's not like she was a vanilla type performer but the kind of abuse she recived from the people associated with that site was something she had never experienced before. I'm not judging you on your choice of porn but knowing that the girls appearing in the videos are in real pain and distress makes me too uncomfortable with the sites associated with these guys.

I think the two main reasons why the updates are getting rare is that agents avoid sending their performers to these guys because the girls tend to quit doing porn after appearing on their sites and I think the guys are located on the East Coast the talent pool is a lot smaller here than on the West Coast.


10-07-12  07:50am

Reply
6
Visit Scoreland

Scoreland
(0)
Reply of Anth's Comment from TheSquirrel:

I think the main reason for PU existing, is to make money by helping genuine porn sites to make money. It mutually benefits both sides. At the same time they give the little guy a chance and a voice in the same way a lot of those TV shows, who challenge crooked organisations or companies, do.

I am really pleased to hear you got a result out of this. Sometimes sites make money out of very strange, incompetent, or dodgy behaviour, and the customer just lets it go, which encourages them, and means they are unlikely to change their ways. This is bad for the customer in the long run, but sometimes the customer bites back. Don't let them get away with it. By challenging them it benefits all of us.

Lets hope this is a lesson for all sites who try this sort of thing. None of us who have followed this are ever going to subscribe to this organisation now, and rightly so.


02-13-09  07:04pm

Reply
7
Visit Scoreland

Scoreland
(0)
Reply of Anth's Comment from Khan:

Admin Note:

The first six replies here were actually made to a Review by this same User. The Review was declined as not meeting the minimum standards for a REVIEW. We moved the replies to show we are not attempting to curtail the discussion.


02-12-09  09:23am

Reply
8
Visit Scoreland

Scoreland
(0)
Reply of Anth's Comment from badandy400:

That is terrible. And to think that I almost took them up on a similar Christmas offer.

As for chargebacks, I would not worry too much about it. It is a scare tactic to keep you from doing something that THEY are affraid of. Credit card companies keep an eye on how many charge backs a company receives over specific amount of time. At a point they will charge for them because the credit card has to deal with them. This is a way to encourage mechants to resolve issues on their own, which is usually better for everyone. When a company exceeds certain amounts of chargebacks they actually lose their ability to use that type of credit card. So doing a charge back is also a way of letting the large credit card companies know the mechant they are processing for it doing something wrong. And if chargebacks start coming from a handful of people the credit card companies do start looking into things.

So, by all means, do what you have to do. Hopefully at some point site owners will be fearful of getting a bad reputation on user review sites such as this one and become conserned with keep members happy and honorring deals offered.

Welcome to PU and we hope to see more from you, and hopefully it will be tales of good fortunes insted of bad.


02-12-09  08:57am

Reply
9
Visit Scoreland

Scoreland
(0)
Reply of Anth's Comment from TheSquirrel:

I agree with Anth on this. It doesn't matter how good the content is. If a site acts in a fraudulant, dishonest, or incompetetnt way, you would never join the site no matter how good the content is. I understand how pissed off customers are when this sort of thing happens. So shout as loud as you like as far as I'm concerned. I want to hear. You also get the warm feeling that by warning others you are diverting money away from rip off artists to genuine good quality sites.

02-12-09  06:27am

Reply
10
Visit Scoreland

Scoreland
(0)
Reply of Anth's Comment from ramscrota:

WOW! Sounds like you had a heap of problems with this lot! Good that you submitted detailed descriptions of what happened, as well as the text of their email.

I had problems with another bunch of shonks - Naked Novices (See my comments in forum & my review of the site)

We can only hope that by naming these fuckers they'll either change their evil ways or go out of business.


02-12-09  04:59am

Reply
11
Visit Scoreland

Scoreland
(0)
Reply of Anth's Comment from Colm4:

I can understand you are pissed (I would be too), but making a review AND a user comment with the same information is a bit too much. I believe the review section is here to write about the site contents.
Giving a 50 score (lowest possible) does imho not do justice to the site especially since you write that the content is good.


02-12-09  04:43am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-11 of 11  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.66 seconds.