Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : DickH (1)  

Feedback:   All (4)  |   Reviews (1)  |   Comments (2)  |   Replies (1)

Other:   Replies Received (5)  |   Trust Ratings (4)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-5 of 5  

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
Reply of DickH's Comment from Ray O:

I agree that some models are way "over-exposed".

Here is my two cents on the real problem:

I don't believe the argument that there is a difficulty getting amateur models - in fact it is now easier than ever to put out ads and get real girl next door gals to pose. I think the ATK site used to solicit material from a wide variety of sources - many amateurs (both models and photographers). They have moved to using a much smaller stable of pro-photographers and these guys in turn are getting references from model ad agencies - aka the Pro/Am pron scene. There is much less girl-next-door and much more wanna-be porn stars. This is fed, in part, by the need to have the models do boy-girl (and girl-girl) sex scenes than frankly many amateur models don't want to do. The fact that they are flying models like Sativa overseas to work with Sean S. and back to the US to work with a number of US-based studios supports the conclusion that they would rather rehash their contract models than find new talent (for which they might only for 10 sets of material).

The site is moving away from its roots of natural, hairy beauties and becoming much more of a routine porn site. That is one reason I do not care for the boy/girl sex shoot. It is virtually all staged stuff with fake semen (aka Ivory liquid soap).

They are also coming back to the same models over and over again so they can say they have many frequent updates. What they don't understand is that more of the same does not equal more of diversity - which is what most of us want.

02-13-10  08:11am

Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
Reply of DickH's Comment from Advent:

There are lots of competing interests in the member base and certainly each is entitled to their own opinion. When we added bg to the Hairy site we had to shorten the update cycle because if we posted a set of a model every 10 days and then got to the video it could take 9 months to work through a model's content if we have 20 sets solo plus bg to post as well as video. Now we run a faster cycle which allows us to get to the hardcore sets and video quicker. This cycle also allows us to post new models sooner and with more flexibility. The viewer gets the same number of updates each day and there is no Hairy site that even comes close to giving a viewer new 10 still sets or video clips every single day, 7 days a week.

Yes, Aria is a well-known model but how many sites have Hairy sets of her? Overall her model rating is pretty good so many viewers must have responded favorably to her sets. We have also had positive feedback from some viewers about the porn star video (eg Nicole Ray when she grew out for Hairy) giving a better performance in the sex scenes. Obviously the porn stars are on average going to deliver a better performance than first timers. Some want the very amateur stuff and others yet prefer the pro-am material. We include enough variety of material in our updates for Hairy to please most people.

Overall, Hairy content is not the easiest to obtain and we do the very best job we can. It means providing some models with repeat work (eg Joe and Yanna) because they refer other models to us. BMB is leaving today to shoot 5 new hairy models referred by prior models he has shot. We like to maintain these connections because it allows us to get a steady supply of first time hairy models who have never posed for adult before. And it is not like these models are not getting good ratings. BMB has probably surpassed Sean R as our top producer by doing this.

02-04-10  10:26am

Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
Reply of DickH's Comment from anyonebutme:

I think it's that the way things are going, more and more girls go with the shaved look - I bet it's getting continuously harder to find the numbers of unshaven girls to shoot.

I don't know, I think ATK still does a good job, considering the times we are in. 'Course it's all subjective.

02-03-10  05:11pm

Visit ATK Natural & Hairy

ATK Natural & Hairy
Reply of DickH's Review from dobbie:

I must agree with everything you have listed, and like you have been a member of this site for as long as i can remmember, and the bottom line is, if you like hairy pussy you cant go wrong here... i think it would be nice though if you could get access to other ATK sites if you are a member of one.. i joined ATK gallerys for a while but it did not have the desired effect that the hairy site has.

02-14-09  08:43am

Visit DDF Busty

DDF Busty
Reply of DickH's Comment from TrashMan:


I always remembered it focusing on the busty, hot, well-figured girls from 1by-day. I can't think of them off the top of my head, but they are there.

Sucks to know that they are venturing into the realm of non-natural big tits (in the sense that they are fat-loaded, not so much natural from the excessive growth of natural tissue as with Gianna Michaels).

02-04-09  05:30pm

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-5 of 5  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 1.95 seconds.